The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1473 Cortez Avenue - Staff ReportItem # vv Consent Calendar if J P� � � ' � Yi } � � � �'� ,�,_ �,. _ �_ �.-. ; ,'' ,�, � �� ' � � �� . , ' �� '�Y4 4 '�� S�� + � f � �� ' � � ..e: �r� ^�-� a c� a , �� ' ;` « � ��%�: �.w«: �. , .: , . t � �.. � �x a a sr�' a 4 ,,.,�",# ,. � ��'- " ��"�, � � � � s� § t o-�'�. �° < �' � f'�a �'^" 3. } 3 Ki . , '� � " ? � �7 ;��b I �� 9 '� . ., „a °,u �-� r . .�, a:.. ,e s. , �a . � -�� . .: . . e �. wt I 1�.. ;. � . , .�� tI.E . . . �.> .,� _ PROJECT LOCATION 1473 Cortez Avenue � ,. , � � ...... . . . , .. .. . . , . . _ � � _ . zi .. , .. . , . . , e.. . . = Item # o Consent Calendar City of Burlingame Design Review Address: 1473 Cortez Avenue Meeting Date: 4/9/07 Request: Design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant and Property Owner: Jason and Denise Payne APN: 026-041-020 Architect: James Chu Lot Area: 6,000 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303, Class 3—(a) construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. History: This proj ect was reviewed by the Planning Commission as a Design Review Study item on January 22, 2007 and as an action item on March 26, 2007. At their March 26, 2007 review the Commission continued the item to the consent calendar after the applicant had addressed several items. Current Project (based on plans date stamped January 12, 2007 and March 28, 2007): The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing two-story house with attached garage to build a new two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,416 SF (0.57 FAR) where 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed floor area is 4 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The applicant applied for a permit to remove an oak tree in the center of the backyard. The tree removal application was denied by the City Arborist on November 17, 2006. The applicant has noted, and the landscape plan indicates that the tree will remain after construction and will be properly protected during construction (see condition number 16). The proj ect includes a detached garage (427 SF, 20'-8" x 20'-8") which provides the required one covered parking space for the proposed four-bedroom house. One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following: • Design review for a new two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage (CS 25.57.010). This space intentionally left blank Design Review Table 1 —1473 Cortez Avenue Lot A 1473 Cortez Avenue .rea: 6,000 SF Plans dated Janua 12, 2007 and March 28 PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front (Istflr): 20�-�� 17'-11" (block average) (2nd flr): 26'-0" 20'-0" _..... . .. ... Side (left): 10'-0" 4'-0" (right): 4�-�� 4�_�� : . ........ ....................................................... .. .. .. . . . ... ....... .............................. Rear (lst flr): 36'-0" 15'-0" (2�zd flr): 36'-0" 20'-0�� , ..... Lot Coverage: 2,235 SF 2,400 SF 37% 40% FAR: 3,416 SF 3,420 SF 0.57 FAR 0.57 FAR' __. # of bedrooms: 4 --- � ............................................ .... .. .............. ................................................................. Parking: 2 covered 1 covered (20' x 20') (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 9 � � � � x 20 9 x 20 _� _ _� ...................................... : �......... .. _�........................................... Hei ht: 29'-8" ; 30 -0 � �� _. DHEnvelo e: com lies CS 25.28.075 '(0.32 x 6,000 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 3,420 SF (0.57 FAR) ,2007 Staff Comments: See attached. Please note that over the past year, the property owners have applied for two tree removal permits on the property. The first one was approved on August 16, 2006, for an oak tree on the left side of the rear yard and it has been removed. The Parks Department has granted an extension to August 16, 2007 for the required replacement tree. The second tree removal permit for an oak tree was denied on November 17, 2006. The applicants noted at the January 22°d Planning Commission meeting that they are planning to keep that tree, which is located in the middle of the backyard, and have noted so on the proposed landscape plan. January 22, 2007 Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review studymeeting on January 22, 2007, the Commission had comments regarding the removal of one oak tree in the backyard, roof shingles, landscaping, and suggested adding design elements such as a front porch, french doors at the rear, and an attic vent. The Commission moved to place the item on the consent calendar at a time when the applicant had addressed the Commission's comments and there is space on the agenda. The applicant submitted a response letter to the Planning Commission on March 6, 2007 and there were no changes made to the plans. March 26, 2007 Action Meeting: At the Planning Commission action hearing on March 26, 2007, the Commission had comments regarding the rafters, fireplace, jasmine, curved windows, and the protected oak in the rear yard. The Commission moved to place the item on the consent calendar at a time when the applicant has � Design Review 1473 Cortez Avenue addressed the Commission's comments and there is space on the agenda. The applicant submitted two response letters to the Planning Commission on March 28, 2007. One addressed the comments made by the Planning Commission at their January 22, 2007 meeting and the other addressed comments made at their March 26, 2007 action hearing. The applicant also submitted a revised front elevation, right elevation, and landscape plan (sheets A.4 and L1.0 date-stamped March 28, 2007). The following is a list of comments made by the Commission at the March 26, 2007, meeting and responses by the applicant: Consider extending the rafters up on the roof at a pitch in order to avoid flat areas, particulaYly on the smallest flat area; taY and gravel is a lot of work and water can pond. The architect noted that the shingle roofing will wrap around the ridge at the flat roof area, as the Planning Commission previously suggested, and that the flat roof is commonly used to allow more articulation to minimize mass and bulk (response letters from architect dated March 28, 2007). (Staff notes the rafters were not extended to form a pitched roof over the flat roof areas.) 2. The proposed chimney along the right side elevation has an insufficient setback to the property line and needs to move at least 6" towards the house. The architect noted, per Burlingame Municipal Code Section 25.28.073, 3b(2), that "a new chimney shall be set back a minimum of two feet from the property line" (response letter from architect dated March 28, 2007). Planning staff confirmed that in the past the zoning code has been interpreted to mean a new chimney just two feet from a side property line is permitted. 3. The jasmine vines along the left sideproperty line need to beplanted closer together and there should be more of them in order to create a landscape barrier between the two properties. The architect noted that the landscape plan has been shared with the neighbor to the left and they are satisfied with the current spacing of jasmine vines as shown, no changes were made to the spacing between plants (response letter from architect dated March 28, 2007). 4. The curved windows proposed on the house shall be retained during constYuction and shall not be replaced with rectangular windows. As originally proposed, curved windows are shown on the front and right elevations (front and right elevations date-stamped March 28, 2007). S. During construction, the applicant should coordinate with the next door neighbor to share a debris box, oY at least avoid having two debris boxes on the street. • No response in writing from architect. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on Apri120, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; Design Review Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 1473 Cortez Avenue Findings: Based on the findings stated in the attached minutes of the Planning Commission's January 22, 2007 design review study meeting, that the applicant has done a nice job with the design, and that it is consistent with the mass and bulk in the neighborhood, and that some of the proposed revisions noted by the Planning Commission on January 22, 2007 and March 26, 2007 have been incorporated, including wrapping the shingle roofing, adding an attic vent, and switching the location of the bay laurel with the strawberry trees, the proj ect is found to be compatible with the requirements of the City's five residential design review guidelines. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings made for design review. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped January 12, 2007, sheets A.1 through A.3, A.S, A.6 and L1.0, and March 28, 2007, sheets A.4 and L1.0, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's November 27, 2006 memo and January 3, 2007 memo, the City Engineer's November 29, 2006 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 28, 2006 memo, the City Arborist's November 30, 2006 memo, the Recycling Specialist's November 26, 2006 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's November 27, 2006 memo shall be met; that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 5. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 6. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 7. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled. C! Design Review 1473 Cortez Avenue that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the proj ect has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 15. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application. 16. that a certified arborist's report showing how the oak tree in the back yard will be protected during construction, to be approved by the Parks Department, shall be prepared and implemented; 17. that the tree protection measures detailed in the certified arborist's report will be installed before a building permit is issued; 18. that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; and 19. that the 24" box size replacement tree required as part of the tree removal permit issued on August 16, 2006 must be planted before final inspection. Lisa Whitman Zoning Technician c. James Chu, Architect City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Prinvose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org a� CI7Y p A � BURLINGAME APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION °p� � o0 Type of application: Design Review ✓ Conditional Use Permit Variance Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Project address: I I � APPLI Name: Address ��.- /a�"� �"�.'Ts�%� i ' �� ARCHITECTJDESI N City/State Phone (w �� Please indicate with an asterisk * e contact person for this project. (h): � � . �� AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the inforn�ation given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature• Date:l I �� I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the "' ' " ' ' Property owner's OWNER � � , �ii'1��/ , �� . : ��i � �.- (h): ��._ � 1� I I � CIN OF BURLiNGI�,A�PP.FRM PLANNING DEPT. Date submitted: NOV 2.0 2006 � l � l�. �h, `�/ � S i �1 �� c� nw�J Z-� �J S� cti.c 1 t� eP �' � �� 3 �,� � �;��..-� �- �- z � . ��` CHU DESIGN & ENGINEERING, INC. 55 West 43r`� Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403 Tel: (650) 345-9286 X104; Fax (650) 345-9287 Email: James@chudesign.com March 28, 2007 Planning Commissioners City of Burlingame 5p1 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA )4010 Rc: FYI of 1473 Cortez Avc. Dear Planning Commissioners: In addition to our previous letle�r, we would like to respond to additional comment raised as follow: 1. As previc�usly s[ated, the shinble roofing will wrap around the ridge at [he flat roof area. "I'herefore, we would like to retain the desiml as submitted. 'I'he flat roof is very commonly used to allow mo�re arl�iculalion to minimize bofh mass/bulk. 2. The fireplace along the right side were design per c�de 25.28.073-3(b).2 (A uew chimney shall be set back a minimum of Cwo (2) feet Prom the properry line. 3. We have shown Clle landscape plan to our neigl�bor (to the lei't), they are sarisfied witll current spacing of Jasmine vines as shown wid�out further changes. Sincerzly, James Chu James Cllu Project Designer RECEIVED MAR 2 g 2007 CITY OF BURLINGAME PIANNING DEPT. CHU DESIGN & ENGINEERING, INC. 55 West 43rd Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403 Tel: (650) 345-9286 X104; Fax (650) 345-9287 Email: James@chudesign.com March 28, 2007 Planning Commissioners City of Burlingame 501 Priinrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: FYI of 1473 Cortez Ave. Dear Planning Commissioners: FYI item: 1. Attic vent added on front elevation 2. Composition shingle wrapping over ridge (flat roof area) called out on front elevation 3. Swapping Bay Laurel tree with Strawberry tree at front yard, shown on landscape plan. Sincerely, ames Chu roject Designer �EUISED �ECEIVED �aR � 8 2007 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unczpproved Minutes March 26, 2007 On one sheet of the plans note all the existing trees, unprotected size as well as protected ong all e property lines; • Fo er mature height consider Bradford Pear and Grecian Laurel i ar; Chair Brownrigg noted tha use is completed, think cha were improvements, the removal of the basement was the applicant's c oved to b' e item back on the consent calendar when the landscape plan and driveway have been a recommended. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg ca a voice vote on the motion to continue this item consent calendar after the landscape an ' plans have been amended based on the direction given and re by Planning staff. The passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers Cauchi, Osterling absent). Staff noted that they wou 'ce this item it was placed on the agenda again. This item concluded at 8:52 p.m. 2. 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JASON AND DENISE PAYNE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER) (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN Reference staff report March 26, 2007, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eighteen (18) conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if any revised plans were submitted, staff responded no. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. James Chu, 55 W. 43rd Ave San Mateo, architect; Jason and Denise Payne, property owners; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Ave, spoke. Issues noted: front porch area; flat areas on roof; fireplace insufficient setback; Jasmine on landscape plan; curved windows; one car garage required; tree protection; and construction site maintenance requirements. The applicant submitted proposed revisions to the Commission. The public hearing was closed. Commissioners had the following comments regarding the project: ■ May want to extend the rafters up on the roof at a pitch in order to avoid flat areas, particularly on the smallest flat area; tar and gravel is a lot of work and water can pond; ■ The proposed fireplace along the right side elevation has an insufficient setback to the property line, it needs to move at least 6" in towards the house; ■ The Jasmine vines along the left side property line need to be planted closer together and there should be more of them, in order to create a landscape barrier between the two properties; ■ The curved windows proposed on the house shall be retained during construction and shall not be replaced with rectangular windows; ■ An arborist report, prepared by a licensed arborist, shall be submitted with tree protection measures for the protected Oak tree in the rear yard, and the City Arborist shall review and approve the arborist report; the protection measures should be installed before a building permit is issued; ■ During construction, the applicant should coordinate, if possible, with the next door neighbor to share a debris box or at least avoid having two debris boxes on the street at the same time; the applicant shall abide by the new construction site maintenance requirements. C. Auran moved to approve the original plans and application, by resolution, with all conditions. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 26, 2007 CA Anderson encouraged the Commission to not approve the proj ect with the plans submitted at the meeting because they have not yet been reviewed by staff and their content is not reflected in the staff report or record. He stated that the Commission could place the item on the consent calendar when all changes had been made to the plans, reviewed by staff and there is room on the agenda. C. Auran amended his motion and moved to place the item on the consent calendar when all changes noted by the Commission had been made to the plans and reviewed by staff and when there was room on the agenda. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to place the item on the consent calendar when all changes had been made to the plans and reviewed by staff and when there was room on the agenda. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi and Osterling absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:10 p.m. CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FIRST AND SECOND STORY AD ION (SARAH & JAM1N CHEYETTE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; HALEY, TSH INTE TIONAL ARCHITECT 59 NOTICED PROJECT PLANNER: E STROHMEIER Reference sta ort March 26, 2007, with attachments. ZT Strohmeier ented the report, reviewed criteria and staff c ents. Twelve (12) conditions were suggested for sideration. Chair Brownrigg opened ublic hearing. Sarah Cheyette, prope owner, spoke. Issues noted: size and material of vents at front ele ion; only Scheme A will work i is circumstance; with Scheme A front fascia should be extended slight nd to the eave as well; he r boards; placement and size of bathroom widow; can window be lowered a fe 'nches; window box terial; and cast stone material under windows. The public hearing was closed. C. Vistica moved to approve the application, r stamped March 13, 2007, be approved for the fro elf extended proportionally to the wall to retain th am window at the front should be lowered as ch as n� ution, with added conditions that Scheme A, date ation; that the eave over the bathroom at the front is �ve projection as approved originally; the bathroom �ble and that the vents, as reflected in Scheme A, shall be made of wood and with the cond„illons in the (1) that the project shall be built as wn on the plans submitte the Planning Department date stamped March 13, 2007, Scheme A front vation, date stamped January 2 007, left side elevation, date stamped January 11, 2006, sheets A0.1 o A3.03 (excluding the proposed fro sheet A3.01, and left side, sheet A3.03, elevations), and to graphic survey sheet 1, with simulated t divided light windows and traditional wood stucco d throughout, and with the relocation of the stai etween the garage and the house into the house a out of the required parking area; that any changes to b' ding materials, exterior finishes, footprint or oor area of the building shall require an amendment to this p it; (2) that the eave over the bathroo nd front door be extended proportionally to the extension of the 11 so that the eave proj ection rem ' s the same as originally approved; that if possible, the bathroom windo t the front when relocated in new wall, shall be lowered as much as possible; the two vents, as shown in eme A, shall be made ood; (3) that the variance for parking space width shall only apply to this reside ' 1 building and shall become void if the building is ever expanded, demolished or destroyed by catastrophe r natural disaster or for replacement; (4) that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's November 18, 2005 � CHU DESIGN & ENGINEERING, INC. 55 West 43`d Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403 Tel: (650) 345-9286 X104; Fax (650) 345-9287 Email: James@chudesign.com March 6, 2007 Planning Commissioners of City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re:1473 Cortez Ave. Dear Planning Commissioner: RECEIVED MAR - 6 2007 CITY OF BURLINGAME pIANNING DEPT. We have reviewed your comments (Jan. 22, 2007 minutesj for the above reference project address and provide the following response: Comments/Response: 1. Flat spots on the top of the roof: We will make sure the shingles are wrap to the ridge. 2. @ Rear elevation, French doors instead of window: The property owner would like retain the window as is. 3. Replace strawberry tree with larger scale tree (Bay laurel): We wish this could be part of conditions of approval, and we'll revise landscape plan prior to building permit submittal. If you have any question, we will be available to answer at the meeting. Sincerely, James Chu Jarries Chu Chu Design R�CEIVED FEB 2 0 2007 CITY OF BURLINGAME PIANNING DEPT. Dear Planning Commissioners: Feb. 16, 2007 After much discussion on whether to add a porch to our design we have decided against it. We really like the look of our home with out the porch. We also have two young boys a��d the porch railing is just one more thing for them to climb on and jump off. We plan on spending a lot of time in our backyard with our family and friends. We feel the porch gives the house a closed in feeling and we like a more open design. Thank you Jason & Denise Payne 1473 Cortez. Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes C. Au�c installed and motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when checked. This motion was surveyor and a full landscape �.('`Osterling. � January 22, 2007 been submitted and plan Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on t o place t i n the consent calendar when the story poles have been installed a e by a licensed surveyor and a fu a e plan has been submitted and plan checke otion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commi ' action is advisory and n��AC�ble. This item 7. 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1— APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JASON AND DENISE PAYNE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER) (63 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commission commented: there was an application to remove one oak tree that was denied, but another tree was removed from the rear yard; was a permit issued for that removal? Talked to owner to gain access to the rear yard and saw the location of the removed tree and the remaining oak. There were no further questions from the Commission. Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. James Chu, 55 W. 43�a Avenue, San Mateo, and Jason and Denise Payne, property owners, stated: decided to keep the oak tree which was denied a removal permit on the property; agree with staff to hire a licensed arborist for a tree protection plan; obtained a tree removal permit to remove the oak in order to accommodate the construction of the detached garage. Commission commented: ■ Did a great job on the design; the right elevation looks nicer when the second floor plate comes down; the design is handsome; ■ There are a couple of flat spots on the top of the roof; should not use curb in these areas; wrap shingles to the ridge to trick the eye; ■ House has the potential to add a front porch; could extend roof element off to one side; front porch is important to extend the house to the neighborhood; ■ At the rear elevation, any thought to French doors instead of the window on the first floor? ■ Compliment profile of corbels on plans; could include an attic vent on the elevation; ■ Clarify the permits issued for the tree removal and for the tree to be retained; and ■ In front driveway side, strawberry tree should be replaced with a larger scale tree like a Bay laurel to help screen the house, and the Bay laurel shown on the plans at the front could be swapped with the strawberry tree shown. The applicant responded: French doors were not added in location of window on first floor so that there would be more useable living space inside the house in that location; and the tree in the back was approved for a iree removal permit by Steve Porter because it was a shallow based oak. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Cauchi made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the requested revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Comment on motion: in favor of porch on this project, would like to see it a little larger; prepared to approve motion with understanding that porch element be added to plans; porch needs to be brought forward 13 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes January 22, 2007 slightly; with respect to the porch, if the front patio area gets used at all, you do not want to create a porch with a railing, generally make an entry porch to bring house forward towards the street; here want to create a patio sitting area that augments the living room; accept design as is because of the patio off of the living room at the front of the house; and the architect can take the suggestions regarding the porch under advisement. Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:30 p.m. . MMISSIONER'S REPORTS _ were no Commissioner's Reports for review. XI. REPORTS - Review of C Council regular meeting of January 16, 2006. CP Monroe revie the actions of the Council meeting of January 1 006. Noting that the City Council upheld the Planning ission's action on 1557 Drake Aven nd introduced the amendment to the zoning map for the EC istrict. Council also held a public aring on the tree removal at the Easton Branch Library. C. Osterli noted that when they placed e new utility lines in the middle of Easton Drive, it was notable that none o he major tree roots fro her side of the street extended fully across the street. He expressed concern abo he support of the sting trees based on this root growth pattern. - FYI: 127 Loma Vista Drive: Revie reque d revision to landscape plan. Commission acknowledged this change. - FYI: Peninsula Hospital Project Com int L Commission acknowledged receipt of s informati - FYI: Proposed Opening of Pa ng Garage for Peninst Commission acknowledged this ' formation. Commission construction manager could p ide the Commission with a their timing anticipated for ext year or so. - FYI: Peninsula Commission ackno XI. ADJ Hospital jsted that it would be helpful if the Hospital m escribing the construction acrivities and Replacement Project — Location of this information. Chair Brov�rigg adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m. submitted, David Cauchi, Secretary 14 Project Comments Date: To: From: November 27, 2006 [� City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for application for design review for a new two-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-020 Staff Review: November 27, 2006 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 3. Sheet A.2 of plans show warp section of driveway to extend over property line projection which is not consistent with the note adjacent to the proposed driveway. Revise drawing accordingly. Reviewed by: V V Date: 11/29/2006 � ;' "� ; �I.IC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS i�t�l��} -� .= yrd��` t-�ru5� Project Name: � w�l�d- ��u.t�o �� Project Address:�3 i�i1�(�-� � �� .} �e�wing requirements apply to the project _,,.� A properly boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) ��'�� .,-'Y�' ��v pr� ��a3ro � �,�" �ti��p � �� __ i� The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. 'i The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's flood zone requirements. S � A sanitary sewer lateral �t is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. .) � The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. � Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. __ Submit tr�c trip generation analysis for the project. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The tr�c study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. __ The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 �� ,�.�velopment�PLANNING REVIEW COMIvIENTS.doc �� C:)�I�IC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION ,__, A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map for reviews. Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. �� The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. �,� The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. � The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles, trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan. � t� By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. '�' The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. *' z..� Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers Pernuts. � No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. �^ .�� The project shall comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. _ The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 . ,� +aevelopment�PLANNING REVIEW CO1�IIv1ENTS.doc � �:�' �.�I�LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. _. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 � +�.�- ��evelopment�PLANNING REVIEW COD�IIvIENTS.doc �.,..,�..�r!:� � .:. �_ _ . �+� ��-`;; �"�'�7-�'. _+'r�rt�:..,.,s5N14 � . -- _ - _ -_ _ �,,,.,,^�� t:��`p� — - �l-��P� c�� - Pt�.uNE- ;y , �,y' + 'q' "�• � �. {,��"t' �-+. , k � r y ' 4 y d� ; �~ � .: . r_ _ _ �E� �R�z - � �`�j _ �, 4 r � f: �t . �i... .: � . c�:2�� ;n . E �; - ,J:� n1� � �P,�� . pf��"' '::� J v,�+S; .`�•��'`. vr �"RkYG � ��:� ;� . �r �� , r_ �_. ` Y,4� ._''..�� -- � �. . ,: �i�: a`�'`d' I •',?�i., ,.. �" .; . � y ��', � �� R� v �l ��y.. « ;�;::_i �� •. �AIA - �� r�'��Z ��.� � IF�E�T� eu�o!I a��7�� ' ! �' � � oc>�r� — � �� t: w �r �Slr�. r �:, i��'� � �A�'� , r �'a r ,d(�.�� ..� w 4 � +' �_,. -��. ^a, ,Z, {''�•��'�.. � .; i�'At1 �'�..'..��.�-..��.'"'�j� - °: r---* �" .q. � . �, vM ' ;+ac�.��a�:•.,+: F""'1�fP1All�� .. � �w,i�4'�a_.�� - �a c'�i�Z ��, x e. : Y..��! [��t tr , •.� .� l i' q �__ .. . ' ^F:',i ,1 � e _ �i -- �'r• � RECEIVED NO V 2 0 2006 C�TY OF BURLING/UI�E PLANNING DEPT. . . � �. -- � _� 14�`� ��`�z;- -� �� U �� - � 1i.�L �,.; ,l � � � 'a" � . � ,,.� � � b. `• • � - fi -, _ 1��3 G�T-�z �� I��.I�F-�T- sl�u Project Comments Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: November 27, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for application for design review for a new two-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-020 November 27, 2006 1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. 2) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 3) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 4) Comply with the new, 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential buildings. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.gov/title24 for publications and details. 5) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. 6) Roof eaves must not project within two feet of the property line. 7) Exterior bearing walls less than three feet from the property line must be constructed of one- hour fire-rated construction and no openings are allowed. �'8) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Note: The "Den" must comply with this requirement. 9) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 10) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 11) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 12) The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet above any roof surface within ten feet. 13) NOTE: Plans that specifically address item 8 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. _ _. __. Review�---__ �__ �;/ -� i / �/ Date: �l /Z �� Project Comments Date: To: December 28, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for application for design review for a new finro-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-020 Staff Review: January 2, 2007 No further comments. Comments 1 through 12 dated 11/27/06 apply. i �/�- � Date: � Project Comments November 27, 2006 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Subject Staff Review: ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Planning Staff Request for application for design review for a new two-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-020 November 27, 2006 _ ��k' � �-SV-_- - �o-�--�� —��ws �a � mG _ �kE._ mak__ ��' �Gho-rE �v� __i�! Tj'Rckyr�tio t�A�S_._.6��6.v__ �F.,�c��T�__.. �5�� E'•�c��o-s�'�_ . _ _ __ --� --.�!�_..__•A'2iso,2c�'�___!L�(/__�_ __Fe/�.___�E___G?Q—�v��'oy► __a:�___n'?!�- -- �� ak __..rn�__ _��.__�� . �E�� .__ _ _ �. _ _� -. _ __ _. _ _ .__._. ___.._ _._. . _ _ _.__ . _--- ___� --/____ Reviewed by: r� Date: �� 3 a � C � c�ry o �1Lg Il 0.9� �tIJAS.A��l`y�� 0', Y�"��A �� A�� C�A��l'� DEPA��'I�1[LI�Z' _ � BURLINGAME �7_ � L��`�' � 850 Burlingame Avenue, Surlingame, California 940] 0-2899 �� '� ��`?:� og Telephone (650) 558-7300 � Parlcs / Trees (650) 558-7330 � c . 9 ,��. • , �.; �RpORl1TEC � �� • � F�:� (o��j oyo-i2i6 � E-i1]aii: reci'eaiioi►�'u�u'iiltg��t�le.uC� - - - November 17, 2006 Denise Payne 1473 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 RE: 1ZEQUEST F�R 1ZEM0�IAL OF OAK TREE @ 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE - BURLINGAME I reviewed your request for the removal of one Oak tree in the back yard of the property at the above address, and have made the following determination: 1) The criteria for removal has not been met. 2) Routine tree maintenance will mitigate applicant's reason for requesting removal of the Oak tree. 3) Therefore, the application has been denied. If you wish to appeal this decision you may: 1) Submit an independent Arborist Report supporting justifiable criteria for removal of these trees and/or any other supporting documentation you may have supporting your request for removal and, 2) Appeal this decision in writing to the Burlingame Beautification Commission, 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame. Any documentation must be received at our office by November 29 2006 if you wish your appeal to be placed on the �eautification Commission's I)ecember 7�' agenda. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me af (650) 558-7330. Sincerely, �� t � 3�>-��.-�,� , Steven Porter "� City Arborist - (ISA #�NC-3073) SP/gb r^: �ean ��rika �'afferke,r Rodney � J.�. Larratt T�� 1477 Cortez Avenue 1469 Cortez Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 Project Comments Date: To: From: November 27, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff X Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for application for design review for a new two-story house with detached garage at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 026-041-020 Staff Review: November 27, 2006 Applicant shall submit a Recycling and Waste Reduction Plan for approval, and pay a recycling deposit for this and all covered projects prior to construction or permitting. Reviewed by: Date: // / � � �d � Project Comments Date: To: From: November 27, 2006 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff Subject: Request for application with detached garage 026-041-020 Staff Review: November 27, 2006 ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 d Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney for design review for a new two-story house �t 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. Reviewed by: ��..`� CJ Date: z� %'�r-d� Project Comments Date: To: From November 27, 2006 � City Engineer (650) 558-7230 � Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff Subject: Request for application with detached garage 026-041-020 Staff Review: November 27, 2006 � Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney for design review for a new two-story house at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, APN: 1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution including but not limited to ensuring that all contractors implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) and erosion and sediment control measures during ALL phases of the construction project (including demolition). Include appropriate stormwater BMPs as Project Notes. These BMPs include but are not limited to the following: • Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials and wastes properly to prevent contact and contamination of stormwater; • Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, wash water or sediments, and non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses; • Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering site and obtain all necessary permits; • Avoid cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on-site except in a designated area where wash water is contained and treated; • Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes, mulching, or other measures as appropriate; • Perform clearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather; • Limit and time application of pesticides and fertilizers to prevent polluted runoff; • Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points; • Avoid tracking dirt or other materials off-site; clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping method; • The Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees and subcontractors regarding the construction BMPs. 1 of 2 Project Comments Con't —1473 Cortez Ave.— New, 2-story house with detached garage. 2) The public right of way/easement shall not be used as a construction staging and/or storage area and shall be free of construction debris at all times. The easement shall be protected from any site runoff. 3) Implement Erosion and Sedimentation Controls (if necessary): a. Install and maintain all temporary erosion and sediment controls continuously until permanent erosion control have been established; b. Address method(s) for diverting on-site runoff around exposed areas and diverting off-site runoff around the site; c. Address methods for preventing erosion and trapping sediment on-site. 4) Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following: a. Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures, including inspection frequency; b. Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of excavated or cleared material. Brochures and literatures on stormwater pollution prevention and BMPs are available for your review at the Planning and Building departments. Distribute to all project proponents. For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727. Reviewed by: �� Date: 11/27/06 2of2 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for design review for a new two-stor�gle familv dwelling at 1473 Cortez Avenue, zoned R-1, Jason and Denise Payne, property owner, APN: 026-041-020; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on April 9, 2007, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written mate�ials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19 per Section: 15303, Class 3(a) — one single-family residence in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption. 2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of Apri1�2007 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for design review. 1473 Cortez Avenue Effective Apri119, 2007 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped January 12, 2007, sheets A.1 through A.3, A.S, A.6 and L1.0, and March 28, 2007, sheets A.4 and L1.0, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's November 27, 2006 memo and January 3, 2007 memo, the City Engineer's November 29, 2006 memo, the Fire Marshal's November 28, 2006 memo, the City Arborist's November 30, 2006 memo, the Recycling Specialist's November 26, 2006 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's November 27, 2006 memo shall be met; 3. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 5. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 6. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 7. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled. 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; -2- EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for design review. 1473 Cortez Avenue Effective April 19, 2007 10. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 12. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 13. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 14. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 15. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application. 16. that a certified arborist's report showing how the oak tree in the back yard will be protected during construction, to be approved by the Parks Department, shall be prepared and implemented; 17. that the tree protection measures detailed in the certified arborist's report will be installed before a building permit is issued; 18. that for purposes of these conditions a certified arborist means a person certified by the International Society of Arboriculture as an arborist; and 19. that the 24" box size replacement tree required as part of the tree removal permit issued on August 16, 2006 must be planted before final inspection. -3- �CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �-�BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � TEL: (650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE • ;��' •�'. ; �• �r �. .� ��.� a y� � '�� ',' •' ° " � _ � i� � � ��_,- �-, � .� , a� a ` '�''r�"= r ��'s�-�� .��`•� � The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, April 9, - 2007 at 7:00 P,IN. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 1473 CORTEZ AVENUE zoned R-le (APN 026-041-020) Mailed: March 30, Z007 (Please refer to other side) 016hi16504325 �-�'- _�_! Mai�ed Frcm � ^��1� �3� F��Q,Cs� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE � s CITY OF BURLINGAME A copy of the application and plans for this, project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. ' Margaret Monroe , , ;3 . City Planner PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side)