HomeMy WebLinkAbout858 Burlway Road - Noticing1 ' �
^ A TexC Consisting of:
The CITY OF BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL announces the following public
hearing on
Monday, the 18th day of March 1996, at 7:30 pem.
in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame,
California. A copy of the application and plans may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame,
California.
860 BURLWAY ROAD APN: 026-111-010
AN APPEAL OF CITY PLANNER'S DETERMINATION AND NOTICE TO
REMOVE AN ILLEGAL ROOF SIGN AT 860 6URLWAY ROAD, ZONED 0-M
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or
prior to, the public hearing.
The property owner who receives this notice is responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice. Please post this notice in a public place on your
property. Thank You
JUDITH A. MALFATTI
CITY CLERK
FrSday, March 8, 1996
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
(415) 696-7250
NOTICE OF HEARING
was mailed to the following property owners:
CORTESE PAUL J TR
NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYSTEM INC
CRISAFI NICHOLAS & STELLA TRS
CRISAFI NICHOLAS & STELLA TRS
JAMALS ENTERPRISES INC
JAMALS ENTERPRISES INC
WESTATES VENTURE INC
HTKG DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES
LAVENSTEIN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
HARVARD INVESTMENT COMPANY INC
JONES JAMES H& PEGGY BORT
C/0 CORTESE INVESTMENT CO
C/0 HYATT CORP
1900 OLYMPIC BLVD
7700 FRANCE AVE S
1241 WHITETHORN WAY
1241 WHITETHORN WAY
865 BURLWAY RD
865 BURLWAY RD
P 0 BOX 41
1333 BAYSHORE HWY
1499 OLD BAYSHORE HWY RM 137
805 VETERANS BLVD #200
862 CHILTERN RD
WALNUT CREEK,
MINNEAPOLIS,
BURLINGAME,
BURLINGAME,
BURLINGAME,
BURLINGAME,
MILLBRAE
BURLYNGAME,
BURLYNGAME,
REDWOOD CZTY
HILLSBOROUGH,
CA 94596
MN 55435
CA 94010
CA 94010
CA 94010
CA 94010
CA 94030
CA 94010
CA 94010
CA 94063
CA 94010
�� �
9 � �-
�� ���r�
Mq � ���
c,Ty o R 11 1996
�l'��/I;� �R�i/ '.,�
�Fp�_ ��
A,P.N.
A.P,N.
A.P,N.
A.P,Ne
A.P,N.
A.P.N.
A.P.N.
AeP.N.
A,P.N.
A.PoN.
A.P.N.
; 025-273-060
e 026-102-070
: 026-111-010
: 026-111-130
: 026-112�010
: 026-112-020
0 026-112-130
: 026-112�140
: 026��322-160
: 026-322-180
: 026-322-190
TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNERS NOT?CED: 11
BILLING FOR THIS MAILING: $48.37
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA )
/% �• GV� o(�if , being duly sworn, deposes and says:
that he/she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the
City of Burlingame on the �1 �c day of ��c. �� , 199�, he/she deposited
in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached
hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses
shown, to-wit:
(see list attached hereto and made part hereo�
that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to Notice of Hearing
pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular
communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above.
,
� ��G
�"`;,,,
,
.-,:`.
�s� �q� _;,, � '`.,:
�. ...� �
s- �"
�r�, �, ,l� ' ,��
.�� � � �,
; 9 �
:.w^ �, �
`�- %� , 6�
%. <:y
: ,�� ��
STAFF REPORT
i��4��
TO:
FROM:
MARCH 18, 1996
CITY COUNCIL
CITY PLANNER
� •g _ zcF'
��
��
��
�
���
�� J' ►11� � `��
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO �n
UPHOLD THE CITY PLANNER'S DIRECTION TO REMOVE A I�I�-
NON-CONFORMING ROOF SIGN AT 858-868 BURLWAY ROAD, �
ZONED O-M.
RE�OMMENDATIdN:
The City Council should hold a public hearing and take
action. This request is for a determination that a non-
conforming roof sign facing the freeway be allowed to
remain in place. Two sets of conditions were proposed for
consideration depending upon the selected action.
Affirmative action should be taken by resolution so that
it can be recorded with the property.
Conditions
If it is determined that the sign should be removed then:
1. That the roof sign should be removed within ten
(10} working days;
2. that an inspection for any required repairs to
the parapet or roof shall be called for as soon as the
sign is removed;
�>�� ,� -�t -n
i
�:�c �
�j
�
3. that no occupancy of the building shall be allowed
until the removal, necessary repairs and inspection
certifying acceptable correction are completed.
If it is determined that the sign should be allowed to
remain then:
1. that the property owner shall submit wind load and
structural engineering calculations for the roof and
parapet for plan check to the Building Department
within ten (10) working days;
2. that the property owner shall obtain a
retroactive building permit and undertake any
corrective work and have it inspected by the city
within thirty (30) days of submitting an application
for a building permit;
3. that the sign shall be one sided, painted o
plywood inserted into a metal frame, with an 8'
exterior dimension, located on the rear parapet
(facing Highway 101) of the structure, and shall
be illuminated in any way;
/✓Ln�--> �/-c'
n �� ��. .�
x 20' ���
not
4. that there shall be no occupancy of the building
until conditions one and two have been completed to
the satisfaction of the Chief Building Inspector; and
5. that the City Council's action shall be taken by
resolution so that the entitlement to the roof sign is
recorded with the property for future owners.
Planning Commission Action
At their meeting on February 26, 1996, the Planning
Commission held a public hearing and voted 7-0 to deny the
applicants request to retain the non-conforming roof sign
because it would be a grant of special privilege not
allowed by the code. The commission included the
conditions suggested by staff if the action was to deny.
In their discussion the commissioners noted the roof sign
may have been installed 40 years ago but it is prohibited
now, the building was destroyed and the new building
should comply with all code requirements; in light of
these facts how can it not be a grant of special
privilege; the issue is the demolition of the building not
the amortization of the sign; the potential tenant who
wants the sign, It's It, already has a large sign visible
from the freeway nearby. In support commissioners noted
that the property owner has suffered a lot of financial
loss, the sign has been there a long time, and the sign is
not lit.
BACK�R6UND:
Nicholas Crisafi is requesting, under the appeal
provisions of the abandoned, obsolete, unsafe or illegal
sign section of the sign code, to keep a roof sign which
faces the freeway on his property at 858-868 Burlway Road,
zoned O-M. Several months ago this warehouse/office C�(,t,�..
structure was severely damaged �y firee The inside was ��
gutted and the roof destroyed. The sign survived the fire �� �.
although the steel support members attached to the roof
were affected. (The sign sits on the parapet and is ��-
�
partially anchored into it.) The sign is an 8' x 20' (160 ��-
SF) single face, piece of painted plywood set in a metal 5���
frame. Originally the sign appears to have been the "can"
type interiorly lit with plexiglass faces. The plexiglass
has been removed and replaced with painted plywood. There
is no lighting at this time. There are no permits on file
for the original installation of the sign. The applicant
indicates that he believes the sign was installed when the
building was built in 1954, before he bought the property.
� ,�
The shell of the building is presently under L
reconstruction. The sign and its support replacements did
not appear on the plans submitted and subsequently
approved for a building permit to reconstruct the walls
and roof. Planning staff noted in their plan check
(November 17, 1995) that the roof billboard sign would
need to be removed. Since the plans approved showed no
supports for the sign or method of installation (wind
loading, structural calculations, etc.), construction on
the site was red tag when the inspector saw supports for
the sign were being attached to the repaired roof. In
addition, no welding inspection had been preformed. The
work on the roof,including the sign's support attachments,
was completed after the stop order.
Should the roof sign be allowed to remain, the applicant
would have to submit construction drawings and wind load
and structural engineering calculations for the parapet
and roof, documenting that the design and installation is
s
safe. In addition, some existing construction on the
parapet and roof may have to be rove for inspection to
insure that the construction inside and welding conforms
to the plans retroactively submitted and approved. The
inspector notes that construction in place which does not
conform will have to be exposed and repaired.
ATTACHMENTS:
N.A. Crisafi letter February 27, 1996, to City Clerk
requesting appeal
Monroe letter March 5, 1996, to Nicholas Crisafi setting
appeal
Planning Commission Minutes, February 26, 1996
Planning Commission Staff Report, February 2b, 1996, with
attachments
Notice of Appeal Hearing, March 8, 1996
�
t A Texc Consisting of:
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
(415) 696-7250
NOTICE OF HEARING
The CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following public
hearing on
Monday, the 26th day of February 1996, at 7:30 p.m.
in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame,
California. A copy of the application and plans may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Planning Division at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame,
California.
860 BURLWAY ROAD
: •R�,��r�a�r�r�a�yc��
AN APPEAL OF CITY PLANNER'S NOTICE TO REMOVE AN ILLEGAL ROOF
SIGN AT 860 BURLWAY ROAD, ZONED 0-M.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,
or prior to, the public hearing.
The property owner who receives this notice is responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice. Please post this notice in a public place on your
property. Thank You
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLANNER
Friday, February 16, 1996
was mailed to the following property owners:
CORTESE PAUL J TR
NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYSTEM INC
CRISAFI NICHOLAS & STELLA TRS
CRISAFI NICHOLAS & STELLA TRS
JAMALS ENTERPRISES INC
JAMALS ENTERPRISES INC
WESTATES VENTURE INC
HTKG DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES
LAVENSTEIN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
HARVARD INVESTMENT COMPANY INC
JONES JAMES H& PEGGY BORT
C/0 CORTESE INVESTMENT CO
C/0 HYATT CORP
1900 OLYMPIC BLVD
7700 FRANCE AVE S
1241 WHITETHORN WAY
1241 WHITETHORN WAY
865 BURLWAY RD
865 BURLWAY RD
P 0 BOX 41
1333 BAYSHORE HWY
1499 OLD BAYSHORE HWY RM 137
805 VETERANS BLVD #200
862 CHILTERN RD
WALNUT CREEK,
MINNEAPOLIS,
BURLINGAME,
BURLINGAME,
BURLINGAME,
BURLINGAME,
MILLBRAE
BURLINGAME,
BURLINGAME,
REDWOOD CYTY
HILLSBOROUGH,
CA 94596
MN 55435
CA 94010
CA 94010
CA 94010
CA 94010
CA 94030
CA 94010
CA 94010
CA 94063
CA 94010
A.P,N, : 025-273-060
A,P.N, : 026-102-070
A.P.N, : 026-111-010
A.P.No : 026-111-130
A.P.N. : 026-112-010
A.P.Ne : 026-112�020
A.P.N. : 026-112-130
A.P.N. e 026�112-140
AoP.N. 0 026�322-160
AoP.Ne : 026-322-180
A.P.Ne : 026-322-190
TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICED: 11
BILLING FOR THIS MAILING: $48.37
�
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COLTNTY OF SANTA CLARA )
�`!/• �UG�t , being duly sworn, deposes and says:
that he/she is a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the
City of Burlingame on the � day of �� �ca � 199 �o he/she deposited
in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached
hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses
shown, to-wit:
(see list attached hereto and made part hereo�
that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to Notice of Hearing
pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Burlingame that on said day there was regular
communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above.
� �v. �v�-
.���
��� �� �
:_ �- ��
FF� ����
c,�.Y �2 � �9
`��'��,�;��. 96
�� � �����
r