HomeMy WebLinkAbout2202 Summit Drive 2 of 3 - Staff Report (2)Item No. 3
Action Item
PROJECT LOCATION
2202 Summit Drive
City of Burlingame Item No. 3
Action Item
Design Review, Variance and Hillside Area Construction Permit
Address: 2202 Summit Drive Meeting Date: September 9, 2013
Request: Application for Design Review, Variance for building height and HillsideArea Construction Permitfor
a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling.
Applicant and Designer: Jack Chu, Chu Design Associates Inc.
Property Owners: Amy Gillis and Craig Fanning
General Pian: Low Density Residential
APN: 027-271-340
Lot Area: 116,218 SF (2.67 acres)
Zoning: R-1
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(2), which states that additions to existing structures
are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000
SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not
environmentally sensitive.
History: On May 23, 2005, the Planning Commission approved an application for Design Review, Variance for
building height and Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition to an existing single
family dwelling at 2202 Summit Drive (see attached May 23, 2005 Planning Commission Minutes). A building
permit was issued for the project, however the project was never built (only a portion of the foundation for the
addition was installed) and the planning entitlements have since expired. During this time, modifications to the
interior and exterior of the house were completed with permits; these modifications were not subject to design
review.
The current property owners recently purchased the property and would like to now build the previously
approved projectwith some modifications (see attached letterfrom Amy Gillis and Craig Fanning, dated June4,
2013). Because the project was not built and it has been 8 years since the project was originally approved, the
application is being processed as a new design review project ratherthan an amendment. A reduced copy of
the originally approved floor plans and building elevations are attached to the staff report for reference.
Site Description: The entrance to the 2.67 acre site is located at the intersection of Summit, Canyon and
Easton Drives (see attached aerial and parcel map). The main portion of the site is located approximately 600
feet from the entrance on Summit Drive and is accessible through a private driveway. The site slopes upward
approximately 84 feet from Summit Drive to the upper portion of the site where the house is located. The
existing house is not visible from Summit Drive. Easton Creek, a creek which drains the surrounding hillside
area to San Francisco Bay, traverses along the western half of the property to an existing 160-foot long, 30-inch
culvert. The culvert extends approximately 50 feet into an adjacent parcel and then becomes an open creek for
approximately 250 feet, and then flows to an existing 24-inch culvert which runs under Canyon Road. An
existing 6-inch sanitary sewer line is located parallel to the existing house and runs under the existing driveway
to Summit Drive.
Project Description: The existing two-story house with a detached two-car carport contains 2,832 SF (0.02
FAR) of floor area and has four bedrooms (existing family room qualifies as a bedroom). The applicant is
proposing to add 725 SF on the first floor and 1,115 SF on the second floor. With the proposed project, there
will be an increase in the floor area to 4,672 SF (0.04 FAR) where 8,000 SF (0.07 FAR) is the maximum allowed.
Planning staff would note that based on the lot size and FAR formula [(0.32 x lot area) + 1100 SF], the maximum
allowed floor area would be 38,290 SF. However, the maximum floor area allowed under any circumstance is
8,000 SF (Burlingame Municipal Code Section 25.26.070, (e)). The proposed project is 3,328 SF below the
maximum allowed floor area.
Design Review, Variance and Hillside Area Construction Permit 2202 Summit Drive
Due to the significant upward slope from Summit Drive (approximately 84' from Summit Drive), the overall
building height was measured from the top of a surveyed manhole cover (elevation 233.72') at the upper portion
of the site where the house is located. It should also be noted that because of the cross slope on the lot, the
existing first floor finished floor (elevation 244.91') is 11'-2" above this surveyed point. A Variance for building
height is required for the proposed addition (38'-4" proposed where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed). Planning
staff would note that the existing house is nonconforming in overall building height at (32'-7").
With this project, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from four (4) to five (5) (proposed den/office
qualifies as a bedroom; the existing family room, which qualifies as a bedroom, will be modified to be open into
the kitchen). Three parking spaces, two ofwhich must be covered, are required on site. The existing detached,
two-car carport (18'-4" wide x 18'-10" deep clear interior dimensions provided where 18'-0" x 18'-0" clear interior
dimensions is the minimum required for an existing two-car carport) provides two covered parking spaces. One
uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. The applicant is requesting the following
applications:
• Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010, a, 5);
• Variance for building height (38'-4" proposed where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed) (C.S. 25.26.060 (a)
(2); and
• Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling (C.S.
25.61.020).
2202 Summit Drive
Lot Size: 116,218 SF 2.67 acres Plans date stam ed: Au ust 20 and Au ust 30, 2013
EXISTING � PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D
SETBACKS ;
Front (1st flr): ; approx. 600' from street no change 15'-0" or block average
(2nd flr): ; approx. 600' from street no change 20'-0"
Side (leff): : 68'-0" 60'-0" 7'-0"
(right): i 60'-0" � 68'-0" 7'-0"
Rear (1st flr): ! 280'-0" � 252'-8" 15'-0"
(2nd fIr): � 298'-3" I 253'-8" 20'-0"
Lot Coverage: j 2215 SF 2440 SF 8000 SF'
� 1.9% 2%
FAR: i 2832 SF i 4672 SF 8000 SF'
0.02 FAR 0.04 FAR
# of bedrooms: � 4 � 5 --
Off-Street Parking: ; 2 covered � 2 covered
i (18'-4" x 18'-10") � (18' x 18' for existing)
1 uncovered no change 1 uncovered
(9' x 20') � (9' x 20')
Building Heighf: ; 32'-7° 2 38'-4°' 30'-0"
DH Envelope: � complies complies CS 25.26.075
' 8,000 SF inaximum allowed by Code Section 25.26.070 (e).
Z Existing nonconforming building height (32'-7" existing where 30'-0" is the maximum allowed).
3 Variance for building height (38'-4" proposed where 30'-0° is the maximum allowed.
�esign Review, Variance and Hillside Area Construction Permit 2202 Summit Drive
Staff Comments: See attached memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire
Marshal and Stormwater Coordinator. Since there is no construction proposed below the top of bank, a
Streambed Alteration Permit is not required from the California Department of Fish and Game nor is a U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers review required. The proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental review
under CEQA.
August 26, 2013 Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study Meeting
on August 26, 2013, the Commission noted that it would be helpful to know what the height of the proposed
building is above grade and asked that dimensions from grade be added on the building elevations. The
Commission voted to place the item on the Action Calendar when the plans have been revised as directed
(August 26, 2013, Planning Commission Minutes).
The applicant submitted revised plans (sheets A.6 and A.7), date stamped August 30, 2013, to address the
Planning Commission's request. Due to the cross slope on the lot, the proposed building height varies 18'-8" to
33'-11" above adjacent grade.
Staff reviewed the "Approved" and "As-BuilY' figures provided by the designer under Project Date on sheetA.O.
The "Approved" figure represents the footprint, or lot coverage, for the previous project approved in May, 2005.
The "As-BuilY' figure represents the footprint, or lot coverage, for the currently proposed project. Planning staff
completes their own lot coverage and floor area calculations and do not rely on the applicants calculations.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the
Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Required Findings for Variance: In orderto grant a Variance for building height the Planning Commission must
find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d):
(a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
that do not apply generally to property in the same district;
(b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship;
(c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and
(d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing
an potential uses of properties in the general vicinity.
Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a Hillside Area Construction Permit by
the Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction ofthe existing distantviews of nearby
properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling
unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060).
3
Design Review, Variance and Hillside Area Construction Permit
2202 Summit Drive
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application,
and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific
findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning
Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the
following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
August 20, 2013, sheets A.0 through A.5 and date stamped August 30, 2013, sheets A.6 and A.7; and
that all new windows shall be vinyl clad or aluminum clad wood windows;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or
pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning
Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 31 and June 11, 2013 memos, the City Engineer's
June 25, 2013 memo, the Fire Marshal's June 10, 2013 memo, the City ArborisYs August 2 and June 14,
2013 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's August 1 and June 13, 2013 memo shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed
upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not
occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans
shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans
throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the
conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination
and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan
and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall
require a demolition permit;
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010
Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR
TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
0
s
o;oyd �euay
E 60Z '0£ 3sn6ny pa�ieW — 6uueaH oi�qnd;o a�i;oN
(pasodad) uoi;n�osaa uoissiwwo� 6wuueld
s;uauawo� }�e;g
SOOZ ' l 4��W padwe;s a;ep 'suoi;ena13 6wp�ing pue sue�d �oo�� panaddy R�snoina�d
uoi�eoi�ddy aoueuen
E lOZ 'ti aun� pa�ep `�aunno �adad wa; �aua� uoi}eue�dx3
uoissiwwo� 6uiuue�d ay; o; uoi�e�i�ddy
sa}nuiW uoissiwwo� 6uiuueld 900Z �£Z �eW
sa�nuiW uoissivawo� 6wuueld £40Z �9Z �sn6ny
:s;uawy�e�y
�aunno �adad 'si��i� �(wy
�au6isap pue;ueoi�dde '�ou� sa;ei�ossy u6isaa ny� 'ny� ��e� 'o
�auue�d �oivag
uunH uaqn�{
�sue�d 6wp�in8 pue 6uiuue�d panadde
ay; o; 6wp�000e ;�mq uaaq sey }oafad ay; ;ey; �uan o� (•a�a 'ad�!} nnopwnn 's�eua;ew wu;) s�ie;ap
�e�n;oa;iy��e ay;�o aauei�dwoo a;ou pue;oadsw pinn�e;s uoisinip 6uiuue�d 'uoi;oadsw �eu� o; �oud;ey; �g �
pue :uoisinid 6uip�mg ay; o; }y6iay;ey};o uogeo�i}�ao apinad pue a6pu
;oa ay;;o �y6iay ay;;ooys ��eys aoRan�ns pasuaop e`uoi}oadsw �oap }oa ay; 6upnpayos o� �oud �ey; •Z �
:pa�npayos aq II�Us uoi}�adsui 6wwe�;
�eu� ay; a�o�aq uoisinid 6uip�in8 ay; o; pauiwqns aq ��eys u6isap panadde y}iM aouei�dwo� 6uiwe�}
6w}uawn�op uoi;eo�i}�a� �e�n;�a}iyae :sue�d panadde ay; uo unnoys se;�mq a�e 's�(eq pue suoi;eao�
nnopuinn se yons `6uiwe�;;e;uapina aq p�noys yaiynn u6isap panadde ay; ui unnoys s�ie�ap �em;oa;iyae
ay; }ey� uoi;eogi}�ao �e�n}oa}iyae ue apinad ��eys '�euoissa;ad u6isap �ei;uapisa� �o ;oa;iyae
�ay�oue �o `�au6isap �eguapisa� �o �a;iyo�e ;oafad ay} uoi�oadsui 6wwe�; ay; 6ui�npayos o; �oud • � �
anup a�wwnS ZOZZ aiw�ad uoporu;suo� ea�y apis�pH pue aoue��e� Ma�naa uBisap
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SS/ON — Unapproved Minutes August 26, 2013
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
7
Chair Sargent recused himself as he owns property within 500 feet of the subject property.
Commissioner Terrones recused himself based on a business relationship with the school districtthat owns
the adjacent property at Hoover School, and working through the school districtwith the prior property owner
of the subject property.
Chair Sargent and CommissionerTerrones left the chambers. Vice-ChairDavis assumed position of Chair.
Commissioner DeMartini met with the husband of applicant. He had asked if the applicant had metwith the
neighbors located uphill from the property. No other Commissioners reported ex parte communications, and
all Commissioners had visited the project site. Reference staff report dated August 26, 2013, with
attachments. Planner Hurin briefly presented the project description.
Questions of staff:
• To clarify, the project approved previously had a 9'-1" plate height on the second floor? (Hurin: Yes.)
Vice-Chair Davis opened the public comment period.
Jack Chu represented the applicant, and Amy Gillis was present as the property owner.
Commission questions/comments:
• The house has a stately look to it. The present house looks a bit dwarfed, so making it this big will
look a lot better.
• Vinyl windows are being kept, and it shows the stucco around the windows on the second floor of
the existing house will be taken out and new trim added to match to the new windows. If went a bit
further and replaced those windows with the same style being used on the rest of the house the
design would have more cohesion. It is up to the applicant whether they would want to do this,
however — nobody else can see it from the street.
• Design is very well done.
• Would be helpful to know what the height above grade is. Add dimensions to exterior dimensions,
Sheet A.5. (Hurin: Height from top of manhole cover is 38'-4", close to front corner. This would be
pretty accurate from adjacent grade. Also the lot has a cross slope, so this is from the lowest point.
If a measurement were taken from the upper end of the lot it might be less than 30 feet. There has
been a survey, so could check and see what other points near the house have been measured for
reference.) (Gillis: Because the house sits down and in, it is difficult to see any neighbors when
standing at the house.)
Public comments:
Paul Lynch, 2845 Canyon Road, spoke on this item:
• Probably the closest house to the subject property. Cannot see the house from his property.
11
C/TY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SS/ON — Unapproved Minutes August 26, 2013
• When the project was first proposed he was in support, and he continues to be in support.
■ It is very tasteful and has not changed much from the original project.
• Given the size of the property, there needs to be a stately house.
• Has concerns with potential subdivision of the lot. It is an issue with him and with the neighbors.
Would like subdivision to be discussed with how it relates to the new addition, since it would make
the lot smaller. (Kane: Under environmental review if something is considered one project it cannot
be divided up or piecemealed where one portion is reviewed but notthe others. Understanding from
staff is that is not the case here, where a particular approval would be linked to a potential lot line
adjustment such that they need to be considered together as one project.)
• On plans confusion with approved existing new footprint and an as-built existing footprint. Did not
understand the approved and as-built conditions were for the new footprint. (Hurin: Will take a look
at those numbers. As-built typically refers to existing. There have been some modifications done to
the house with permits that did not require a public hearing or design review.)
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Comments:
• Likes the design but concern with the increased height. A number of the homes on Kenmar can be
seen from the house. Nervous that if an additional six feet is added on top, the views from Kenmar
will not be what they are today.
• Not sure if this is a story poles are warranted or not, but thinks it might be. Wants neighbors to know
what an additional six feet would look like and make sure they are comfortable with it.
• Would be more comfortable requesting story poles if there was someone at the meeting expressing
concern or had received letters. Assuming all the neighbors in the area have been noticed and a
sign has been placed in front of the property, would be reluctant to require story poles but would
support the application being on the Regular Action Calendar rather than Consent.
• Concern with relying completely on noticing — don't know if neighbors are not home or on vacation,
but assuming if they are not at the meeting they do not have an issue with it.
• If it is brought back on Regular Action there will be two notices and two public hearings.
Commissioner Gaul made a motion to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when complete.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Bandrapalli.
Discussion of motion:
None.
Vice-Chair Davis called for a vote on the motion to p/ace this item on the Regular Action Calendar. The
motion passed on a voice vote 40-2-1(Commissioner Yie absent, Commissioners Sargent and Terrones
recused). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appea/ab/e. This item concluded at 8:17
p.m.
Chair Sargent and Commissioner Terrones retumed io the chambers.
12
Ciry of Burlingame Planning Commrssion Minutes
May 23, 2005
5. 2202 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, VARIANCE FOR
HEIGHT AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY
ADDITION (WARREN DONALD, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JACK CHU, CHU
DESIGN & ENGR.. INC., DESIGNER) (40 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report May 23, 2005, with attachxnents. Plr Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and
staff comments. Eleven conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Warren Donald, properiy owner, was available to answer questions.
Commission noted that the plans have been unproved since the last time it was reviewed, at the study
meeting asked that the plate height on the second floor be reduced from 9 to 8 feet, think plate height should
be consistent with other projects, this is a tall building, can't see the house because of its location and dense
vegetation, but do not want to make the decision based on that, not concemed with the plate height as
proposed, it is appropriate with the design. Applicant noted that the existing first floor plate height is tall,
feel that the proposed second floor plate height is in keeping with the house. Commission asked if the
proposed stairway is in an easement, please clazify. Applicant clarified that the stairway would not be
located in the easement. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling complimented the applicant for addressing all of the Commissions' concerns and moved to
approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as
shown on the plans submitted to the Plamiing Department date stamped May 11, 2005, sheets A1 through
A6 and Ll, and date stamped February 11, 2005, Boundary and Partial Topographic Survey, and that any
changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor azea of the building shall require an
amendment to this permit; 2) that all existing trees on site, with the exception of the 10-inch diameter
buckeye to be removed, shall not be removed and the applicant shall have an arborist's report prepazed which
documents how each tree within 30 feet of the proposed addition should be protected during construction;
this report shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist and the property owner shall call for the
Arborist to inspect the protection measures installed before a building permit shall be issued, and that the
property owner shall maintain the trees after construction as directed by the certified azborist's report; 3) that
the applicant shall apply for and receive a tree removal permit to remove the existing 10-inch diameter
buckeye tree, as shown on sheet Ll, date stamped May 11, 2005, from the City Arborist prior to issuance of
a demolition pernut; 4) that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage,
which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and azchitectural
features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 5) that prior
to scheduling the framing inspection, the project azchitect, engineer or other licensed professional shall
provide architectural certification that the azchitectural details such as window locations and bays are built as
shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the proj ect, the properry owner
or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the
Building Department; 6) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note
compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been
built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 7) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues
shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not
visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the conshuction plans
before a Building permit is issued; 8) that the conditions of the City Engineer's Apri16, 2005, and December
29, 2004, memos, the Fire Mazshal's December 21, 2004, memo, the Chief Building Official's December 22,
2004, memo, the Recycling SpecialisYs December 29, 2004, memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's January 3,
2005, memo shall be met; 9) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and
Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 10) that the project shall comply
6
Ciry of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
May 23, 2005
with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new
conshuction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any
partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition pernrit; and 11) that the
applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and
Discharge Control Ordinance. The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers.
Brownrigg and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:50 p.m.
C. Vistica arrived at 8:00 p.m.
�
o ��E
��
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Ty e of application:
� Design Review
❑ Conditional Use Permit
PROJECT ADDRESS:�
❑ Variance
❑ Special Permit
O Please indicate the contact person for Nis project
APPLICANT project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name: ��� �c�
Address: �� ./it �S'T �J7� l\ UE
City/State/zip: � � G �f} ��0 3
Phone:
Fax:
E-mail:
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Pro�ectcontactPerson❑
OK to send electronic copies of docume ts ❑
Name: � JAC.4c (�"�J �1°- (��v .vE'
Address:
City/State/Zip:
❑ Parcel #: 027 _ 2� �_ 340
❑ Other:
PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑
OK to send eleetronic copies of documentsj�
Name: �i�11 lil i�m � I i S
Address 22eJ2 �vvivYw�" �✓ -
City/State2ip: � � ✓� f.lN� . CA
Phone: �-i I S � Z2 g�-� 3
Fax:
E-mail: � S--�'�C a� oa � LN'Y1
//d'I�S
3
•��s�a��:a
s�u��l���
Fax: / Q� - 3�- j 2$`] 1UN - 4 2013
E-mail
* Burlingame Business License
PROJECT DESCRIP'
ex:s-i-ihc s;
F;fS-I- a.-� se� d.- d s4b
w
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify
best of my knowledge and belief. /
qpplicant's signature:_
I am aware of the proposed
Commission.
Property owner's
and hereby
;1TY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNIiJG DIV.
d �d;-��o�
�erjury that the information given herein i true and correct to the
�_ Date: � �
the above applicant to submit this pplic ion to the Planning
� Date: lP S � 3
Date submitted: �P `�' � �
,t Verification that the project architecUdesigner has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project S:�HANDOUTS�GCApplftadon IOOS.handouL00[
�� z m o a n y.
� � � S C � �
o � m � � �
� V
fD
<
�
O
�
cncnzmaoc�
o�' m x m m o
m � �n' m c> >
�,� ?�'� a
s
�� � °
�� �=v
3�� m"�.cm
r: � � � vi -s
� � �
� j (�D
� � �
�
� � 9
� G � �.
� 2 9
� � �
o'
3
�
3
�
�
�"
I2_
�
�
G'
�
d 4
3 �
�
�
�
�
v� �
� �
y �
J/'
^\
IL.!
�
�
7
�
�
�
�
�
2
�
`�—
�c
\
�
O
N
n
�
v
c�
N
C�
'a
0
7
3
N N.
�
��
C�
aN�
��
Oo
� �
`` v
v
To: The City of Burlingame
From: Amy Gillis
Date: June 4, 2013
Re: 2202 Summit Drive Plan Changes
To Whom it May Concern:
l� =��i°�✓��
JUN - 4 20�3
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DIV.
We (Amy Gillis & Craig Fanning) recently purchased a home at the above-mentioned
address. We would like to pursue the previously approve renovation and addition
to the home. This requires some minor changes to the architectural plan, which
have been submitted for your review.
These changes (and rational for the changes) include:
• The kitchen in the addition was moved from the back of the room to the front
This change was made as the foundation wall at the rear of house is already
in place as part of the previously approved plan. However, the prior owner
and contractor made the foundation wall higher in elevation, which
eliminated the site line windows at the rear. Therefore, in order to keep the
windows in the kitchen at eye level, the plan is to move the kitchen to the
front of the front room.
• The bay window at the side of the addition is now eliminated and in its place,
the wall was continued straight at that corner. The bay window was
eliminated due to pre-existing foundation work done by the original owner
and contractor (as part of previously approved plans).
• Small change to the master closet and bathroom to reconfigure both with the
goal of a slightly larger master doset.
These changes are included in the revised architectural plans submitted for
approval. If you need any addi[ional clarification, please don't hesitate to contact us
or Jack Chu (the architect).
We appreciate your consideration and are looking forward to our new Burlingame
home!
Sincerely,
� ,�r /, "�I
Amy Gil v
CITY
'
��• .o.i.r
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROA� • BURLINGAME� CA 9401 O
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARIANCE APPLICATION
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe fhe exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your property which do not apply to ofher properties in this area.
Se�e a-Ei-a.c�z c�.
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment ofa
substantial property right and whaf unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship might result from fhe denial of the application.
c. Explain wi►y the proposed use af the proposed locafion will nof be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in fhe vicinify or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
d.
How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, 6ulk and
characfer of fhe existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity?
Hendoufs\Variance Applicafbn2008
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or condifions applica6le to
your property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
Do any conditions exist on the site which make other alternatives to the variance impracticable or impossible and are
also not common to other properties in the area? For example, is there a creek cutting through the property, an
exceptional tree specimen, steep terrain, odd lot shape or unusual placement of existing structures? How is this
property different from others in the neighborhood?
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment ofa
substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship might result form the denial of fhe application.
Would you be unable to build a project similar to others in the area or neighborhood without the exception? (i.e., having
as much on-site pzrking or bedrooms?) Would you be unable to develop the site for the uses allowed without the
exception? Do the requirements of the law place an unreasonable limitation or hardship on the development of the
property?
c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimenfa! or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighboring properties or structures on those
properties? If neighboring properlies will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting, paving,
landscaping sunlighUshade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance.
Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safery or general welfare?
Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems,
water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks, storage
of chemicals, situations which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases).
Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protection? W ill alarm systems or
sprinklers be installed? Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services (i.e.,
noise, unruly gatherings, loitering, traffic) or fre services (i.e., storage or use of flammable or hazardous materials, or
potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removal).
General we/fare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistenl with the ciys policy and
goals for conservation and development? Is there a social benefit?
Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this
site or adjacent sites)? Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderly or
handicapped?
d. How will the proposed project 6e compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
viciniry.
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood? If it does not affect
aesthetics, state why. If changes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existing
architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? If a use will affect the way a
neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and
explain why it fits.
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to
the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation, etc. with other structures
in the neighborhood or area.
How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the
image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. W ill there be more traffic or
less parking available resulting from this use? If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why.
How will the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the general vicinity? Compare your
project with existing uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state why
your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity.
HandoutsNaAance Applicatlon2008
2202 Summit Drive
Burlingame, California 94010
City of Burlingame Planning Department
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
�'�'•,`;��p�l' `��:,��
�1UG 2 U [f!;;
CI � ! OF BURLIiJC-F,ME
CDD-PIAPINING DIV.
CTTY OF BURLINGAME VARIANCE APPLICATION
RE: 2202 Summit Drive
a Describe the exceptiona[ or eztraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your property, which do not apply to other properties in this area
Answer: A condition exists on this site which makes this property uncommon to
the other properties in the area. The exisHng structure is placed well off of
Summit Drive, not visible from the road or to other neighbors. The existing
structure is placed up on a knoll that is elevated from the driveway. Calculating
the height requirement from Summit creates the exceptional or extraordinary
circumstance regarding this property.
1i. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
oja substantia[ property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship might result from the denial ojlhe app[ication.
Answer: Currently, the existing structure has a flat roof. Part of the addition to
the existing structure includes a new roof that is not flat. The addition, which
also includes bedrooms, will make the esisting structure comparable and similar
with the other homes in the area. Because of the placement of the existing
structure requirements of the law are placing unreasonable limitaHons on this
property.
� Frplain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimenta[ o�
injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity or to the public hea[th,
safery, general welfare or convenience.
Answer. Granting of this requested variance will not adversely affect the PubGc,
as the structure is not visible from Summit Drive or surrounding neighbors.
!.
Granting of this requested variance will not adversely affect the pUblic safety
health in that no underground tanks, storage of chemicals are involved. This
addition will not encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable
disease.
Public safety will be addressed at all times. The addition will be built with the
current safety codes and requirements applicable from the Burlingame Building
Department, Fire department and Police Department.
The addition will be a benefit to the general welfare of the public. The addition
is an improvement to the esisting structure. The completed structure will be
comparable to other homes in the area.
The public will not be inconvenienced by the construction of the addirion. The
property is not visible from Summit Drive and there is ample onsite parking for
construction vehicles.
t�. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the exuting and potential uses on the adjoining propeMies in the
general vicinity7
The proposed addition to the structure will make the structure compatible to the
other structures in the area. Currently the existing structure is approx.1,900
square feet. But more important to note here is that the existing structure is on
an approx. 3 acre site, which is not visible from Summit Drive. Also the
structure is not visible to our knowledge from the surrounding neighbors.
This proposed addition would not adversely affect the character of the
neighborhood because in addition to not being visible it will be compara6le to
other homes in the area.
Because of the size of the site and the scope of the addition we feel that proposed
project is consistent with other homes and uses in the vicinity.
�:
9�.
� fi.
N
(I�. SECQND Fl
� o�s4E:��'
<
q ..
_ �
y
�.
PLAN
� (iVj FII25�i' FI:OO�t �'LAN
x.�e: V�'4�.-a
S
. . .".. . .{ /��
. ._. _. ....�.�.. .
. 6�0, z .____ . . .__._iL3_ .. .,: � '��i_ • 4� _.."ItL _ _.� �i3. 'Y8
uldeSrl !>dzn'° �WN'..r. y � ,....�V ��.�.lti��' i
� : a,
0
� ;.
LEFT SIDE (SOUTH��}'$� ELEVATION
� :fA�E: Fi`�'
� �-_ - i,..� _.:-. . _. ::::.- . _ ..
/—' ,� : � :- '.(M)LT.NT S}7JTHETICSWYEPOMAI'CH W/FXISTFNG—= � ..-- --
.:�... .._ .._ . ."" _ . __
.': _
�y ':� ` �fPnit
... .. . ... _
_': _._ . ". ' ' �
� ._ '.:_ Y_ '� _ - ��_ •<
� I — . . _ �.. . -- - . - '.�� � �
`i� -'.:.QJ1LiWT.SYMI�TICSLATETOMATCH`A/FJOSTiNO {E)iT.pTSYNTH6LIC:SI.ATEROOF���':
- _ _- _ w�a� E� �
: _� —_ -- --- „�._,�
_ _— _ - _' — ��SNCCOPIM$H. __ "—___ —
� I-.�... / _ _"' � , ' .
__—. ._ _�..,.':�i��`....._—.—_..."___�_ —'_ F.,o+�a,an<w�ei'
¢ �....a....+..ny
, ' . � f�STUCCA£rtn9H .
FRONT (60UT$�EA$T)�I.EYATION
:CEIVtl.
4y i 12005
OF BURLINGAME
ANNINQ DEPT.
:cIX+ta f.lmR.LZi�-2
. L� J' i r7 �H:.S m. L�L. _
ILLCwUNq>D r/Ir�oaJ
(TRIW 41J1n)
t u,�. : .� �no,..,�
<,R,,, . ,�:.o.
�
• �cY.ctartxey�' zz�.zi �
z �
S (Y) �\
�tsvr srnraencscarssd�-
W161(ISTMG
_.:"�� �
. �
� � --�
ce�sivccoFmisx'� ���
RIGHT SIDE (NORTH-E�Ta, ELEVATION
_cn.t:Y9'1
`a
d �
i�
o �"�
q
�
�. u q
a d�
�9��
Cy��
���=
3 �
�'�"s_
oa�
�,
, R�AR (NORTH-WES'1) ELEVATION . . _ .. .. ..
:� �.�. �y, r_o
RECEIVED
MAY 1 1 2005
ciry oF euauNc,nnae
PI ANNINfa IIFPT.
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From
July 31, 2013
0 City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
X Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
� City Arborist
(650J 558-7254
� Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
� NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review Amendments for changes to a previously
approved first and second story addition to an existing single family
dwelling at 2202 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-340
Staff Review:
No further comments.
All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 6-11-2013 will apply to this
project.
Reviewed
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
June 6, 2013
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously
approved first and second story addition to an existing single family
dwelling at 2202 Summit Road, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-340
Staff Review: June 10, 2013
� On each page of the plans where the term "As-BuilY' appears replace that term with
"Proposed."
2) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code,
2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code,
2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all
amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission
has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2013 then this project
must comply with the 2013 California Building Codes.
On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full scale.
Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy
E�ciency Standards.
Go to http://www.enerqv.ca.qovltitle24/2008standards/ for publications and details.
5� Place the following information on the first page of the plans:
"Construction Hours"
Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
(See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.)
�n the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require
work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans
may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The
building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for
any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to pertorming the
work.
7) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame
business license.
8) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
9) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the
location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking.
10) Provide existing and proposed elevations.
11) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of
Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-
month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing
building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure
shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or
structures." This building must comply with the 2010 California Building Code for new
structures. BMC 18.07.020
Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to,
and approved by, the Building Division prior fo the implementation of any work not
specifically shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the
field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the
Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for
work that is not shown on the Approved plans.
12) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of
Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of
Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the
building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued.
13) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be
demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is
that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin
(including the removal of a� building components), until a Building Permit has
been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that
no work is authorized or performed.
14) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines
15) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures.
16) Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line
will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table 602)
�ooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door
that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear
opening height and width of all required egress windows on the elevation
drawin s.
dicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the
Department of Public Works.
19) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any
point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning
Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height.
20) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
21) Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address
items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 17, and 18 must b�'Pg-submitted before this project can move
forward for Planning Commission �cti�i.
Reviewed
Project Comments
Date: June 6, 2013
To: X Engineering Division � Fire Division
(650) 558-7230 (650) 55&7600
� Building Division � Stormwater Division
(650) 558-7260 (650) 342-3727
� Parks Division 0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously
approved first and second story addition to an existing single family
dwelling at 2202 Summit Road, zoned R-1, APN: 027-277-340
Staff Review: June 10, 2013
All previous comments still apply.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 6/25/2013
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
June 6, 2013
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously
approved first and second story addition to an existing single family
dwelling at 2202 Summit Road, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-340
Staff Review: June 10, 2013
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly —
Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between domestic and fire protection lines.
3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas.
4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
�d��a�' V ��
,IUN 11 ZQ13
Reviewed by: � /� s%����
/`
� CITY OF BURItt�^�"�E
��� CDD-pLl�NN��4s�N.
i
Date: �p'�..�/ 3
Project Comments �
Date:
To:
From:
July 31, 2013
� City Engineer
(650) 55�7230
0 Chief Building Official
(650) 558=7260
X City Arborist
(sso) 5ssa2sa
� Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
� Fire Marshal
(65C) 558=7600
� NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727 .
0 City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review Amendments for changes to a previously
approved first and second story addition to an existing single family
dwelling at 2202 Summit Drive, aone� �-7, PcpN; 9�7-277-340
Staff Review:
1. No further comment — no trees are proposed for removal.
Reviewed by: B Disco
Date: 8/2/13
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
June 6, 2013
0 Engineering Division
(650) 55�7230
0 Building Division
(650) 55�7260
X Parks Division
(650) 55&7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously
approved first and second story addition to an existing single family
dwelling at 2202 Summit Road, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-340
Staff Review: June 10, 2013
1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of
tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division
(558-7330).
( 2. �ite plan needs to show all major trees and shrubs as per requirements.
��
Reviewed by: B Disco
Date: 6H4/13
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
July 31, 2013
� City Engineer
(650) 558-7230
� Chief Building Official
(650) 558-7260
� City Arborist
(650) 558-7254
0 Recycling Specialist
(650) 558-7271
� Fire Marshal
(650) 558-7600
X NPDES Coordinator
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review Amendments for changes to a previously
approved first and second story addition to an existing single family
dwelling at 2202 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-340
Staff Review:
1) The Checklist submitted had three deficiencies;
• 6.1. was not answered however, upon further review I noted that total addition
was likely to be less than 1,000 sq.ft., I checked the "No" box.
• Box B.2.k. had a check mark. Self-treating areas will not be required for this
project.
• The Box for architectural copper was not marked, however the box on the
right side of the sheet for Plan Sheet # was marked "N/A". Appropriate BMPs
must be utilized if architectural copper is used.
2) All other issues noted in review dated 6/13/13 have been addressed.
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727
Reviewed by: SD S�
Date: 8/1 /13
. � .. , _
.._..;.... ...... ::....:::..,:....::�.��:,. ,. -�- -.:_..�.:.:.�....... ,,:..-.....:.:�,......:::.. ...........,.... .... �--.._........ .. _.. _ :>
:_::, ...ti__.r._.. . ........,:. .. .. .:.,... . ....... . . ...-
. . � I:
SAN MA�EQGOUNTYWIUE ��CEIV�D
WaterPoilution
Pf�^'ttion Program
•� 7, City ot Burlingame - O�ce of �-
5tormwater Checklist for Small Projects Environmental Compliance �UL 3 0 2013 � �
Municipal Regional Stortnwater Permit (MRP) '1103 Alrpo�t Blvd E
OrCer No. RZ-2009-0074 ; Order No. R2-2071-0083 Offlee: 650 342•3727
NPDES No. CAS612008 ( � �
Fax: (650) 342•3712 CITY OF BURLINGAME ,
CDD-PL4NNING DIV.�
Comp/ete this foim lorindividua! sing/e family home projects of any size, other pro/ects that create and/or replacs /ess than 10,000 �
square feef of impervious surface, and projects in the followrng cafegories fhat create and/or replace /ess then 5, 000 squa2 feet of .
impervious surface: restaurants, retaif gaso/ine ouUets, auto service facilitres', and paif6ng lots (stand-e/one or part of ano!her
use).
A. Project Information �% \ ',
A.1 ProjedName: FOrN/V!n[� / (�/(�%/S ��S�L1�i11C�
q2 Pro}ect Address:
q,3 Project APN:
B. Select Appropriate Site Des�gn Measures
. Yes No
0 �
� ❑
1[J. ❑
. � ❑
� ❑
...... .. � .._......_..0__.
� ❑
6.1 Does the project create and/or 2place 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface�? ❑ Yes � No �
D If yes, and the project will receive final discrsUonary appmval on or afterOecember f, 2012, fhe projecl must include one
of Site Design Measures a through f.'• Fact sheets regaiding site design measu2s a through f may be Gownloaded at
hHp./hnvw.fiowstobay.org/bs new development.php#liyers.. _
D!f no, w the praject wiil receive finel discrelionary approval bePore December 1, 2012, fhe project is .encou2ged to
implement s/te deslgn measures , which may 6e requi�ed at municrpality drscretion. Consu/t wrth municrpal staff about
2quiiemenfs for yourproject '
B.2 Is the site design measure included in the proJect plana? .
a. Dlred roof runoff into cistems or rain barrels and use rainwater for Irrlgation or
other non-poteble use. � _ __ __
'b. Direcf roof ninoff onto vegetated areas.
a Dlrecl nrnoff from sidewafks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas.
d. Direci runoff from driveways andlor uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas.
e. Construct sidewalks, waikways, and/or patios wiih permeable surfaces.
-�-- �f:�-Constnictbikelanes�driveways�and/or
' surfaces.
interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical
❑ ❑ I. Self-rete
�. ❑ m. Plant or
i� ■
11 ■
►_ ■
■ :Y
Minimize land disturbance and Impervious surface �
h. M�imize permeability by
i. Use
J. Protect sensitive areas,
changes to the naturel i
and
distributed landscape-based detention.
�b
space.
wetiand end nparian ereas, end minimize
k. Self-treating area (see Section 4.2 of the C.3 Technical
� See Standard Industrisl Classificatlon (SIC) codes hg�g.
Z Complete the C.3/C.6 Development Review Checklist'rf the proJec[ is not an indivitlual single famity home, and it creates and/or replaces
10,000 square feet or more oP impervious sutiace; or if it is a reslaurant, retail gasoline outlet, auto service facility, or parking lot projed that
creetes and/or replaces 5,000 square faet or more of impervious surface.
3 See MRP Provision C.3.1,
� See MRP Provision C.3.s.(.(6). �
1
area (see Section 4.3 ot the C.3 Technical Guidance)
U
4
�.
i-
I
I
�
Approved Decem6er4. 2012
b2T - Z7L 3�--v �
n
�
r:.... .'.......... ..�...:: . i �...-.�:.. .:.:: �:..� .... ........... ......... . . �.........,... .. .-. ......_... ..........-.: ............ , � _.... ... .............-.., _
Sformwate� Checklist for SmaU ProJects
'::a Select approprlate source controls (Encouraged for all projec[s; may be 2qui2d atmunicipa/ discrelion. Consultmunicipa! staff.5)
Are these Feafures that Is source control '
features i� � requfre source I Source control measures measure (ncluded '
control (Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements) i
project7 measures inprojectplans?
Yea No Yes No
J� ❑ Storm Drain � Mark on•site inlets with the words "No Dumping! Flows lo Bay" or equivalent ❑ ❑
❑ Ffoor Drains � Plumb interiorfloor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit]. ❑ ❑
� ❑ Parking garage • Plumb interfor paricing garage floor drains to sanitary sewer.fi ❑ Q
�❑ Landscaping • Retain exlsting vegetation as pradicable. ❑ ❑
• Select tliverse species appropriate to the site, Indude plents (hat are pest-
and/or disease-resistant, drought-lolerant, and/or attract benefidai insects.
• Minimize use of pestiades and quick-release fertilizers.
e I Isa cfFciant Irrinatinn avNem• dectnn tn minimbe nmoH. .
❑ ❑ PoouSpa/Fountain • Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facflitate draining.° _
❑. ❑ Food Service Provide sink or other area for equipment cleaning, which is:
Equipment • Connected io a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge.6 •-
(non- • Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equfpment to be cleaned.
residential) • Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to prevenl stormwater run-on
and run-off, and si ned to re uire e ui ment washin in this area.
❑ � Refuse Areas • Provide e roofed and enclosed area for dumpsfers, recycling containers, etc.,
designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runofi. '
• Cpnned any drains, In or beneafh dumpsters, crompactors�, and tallow bin �.
- � . areas servin food 'service facilities to the sanita sewer.
� ❑ Outdoor Process . perform process activities, either indoors or in roofed outdoor erea, designee
ou�-
■ ■
��
�� ,
no
❑ Outdoor • Cover the area or design to avofd poilutant contact with stormwater runoff. ❑ I ❑
EquipmenH •� Locate area only on paved and contained areas.
Materials • Roof storage areas that will contain n6n-hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary
❑ ❑ Vehide/ • Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stonnwaler run-on and runoff,
Equipmen[ plumb to the sanitary sewe�, and sfgn as a deslgnated wash area.
• C(eanin • Commercial car wash facil(Nes shall dischar e to the sanita sewer.e
❑ ❑ Vehtcle/ . • Designate repair/ma[ntenance area Indoors, or an outdoors area designed to
Equipment prevenf stortnwater runon and runoff and provide secondary containment. Do
Repair and ' noF install drains in the secondary containment areas.
Mafntenance � No floordrains un�ess prefceated prior to discharge fo fhe sanitary sewer. e
• Conned containers or sinks used for paris cleaning to the sanitary sewer. e
Q ❑ Fuai • Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface that Is a) minlmally graded to
Dispensing prevent ponding and b) separated from fhe resf of the site by a g�ade break.
Areas � Cenopy shalf eMend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain
❑ ❑
N
❑. ❑
N/� ... .. ._
❑ ❑
�� i
❑ ❑ Loading Docks • Covar and/or grade to minimize runon to and runoff ftom the loading area. LJ
' • Position downspouts to diract stormwater away from the loading area.
• Drain wafertrom loading dock areas to fhe sanitary sewer s
• Install door skirts between the trailers and tfie buifdin .
❑ ❑ Fire Sprinklers • Design for discharge of fire sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewere ❑
� ❑ Miscellaneous • Drain condensate of air conditlon(ng units to Iandscaping. Large air ❑
Drain or Wash conditioning units may connect lo the sanitary sewer.6
Wafer + Roof draf�s shall drain to unpaved area where practicahle.
+ Drain boile� drain lines, roof top equlpment, ali washwater to sanitary sewere.
❑ ❑ Architecfural • Drain rinse water to Iandscaping, discharge to sanifary sewere, or collect and ❑
Copper dispose properiy offsite. See ilyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper.'
S.See MRP Provlsion C.3.a.i(�.
2
❑ �.
N
;
❑ �.
❑ /
❑ � i
N � '
Approved December 4, 2012
Stormwater Checklist for Smal! Pro�ects I'
f:
°D, Implemertt construction Best Management Practices (6MPs) (Required;orall projecfs.)
D.1 Is the site a'High Priority Site"? (Municipal staff will make this determ(nation; if the answerls yes, Y0S �
the project will be referred to constructlon site inspection sta/f formonfhly stormwaterinspections
dunng the wet season, October 1 through Apri! 30.)
."High Priority Sites" are sites that require a grading petmit, are adjacenE to a creek, or are
othenvise high priority for stormwater protectlon during constructian per MRP Provision C.6.e.ii(2).
�
No,� r
�
D.2 All proJeds require approprfate stormwater BMPs during construcHon, indicate which BMPs are induded in the projed, below.
Ye� No Best Manaqement Practice (BMP}
�❑ Attach the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's consWdion BMP plan sheet to �
proiect plans and revuire contractor to implement the applirable BMPs on the plan sheet `
�❑ Tamporary erosion controls to stabiiize ali denuded areas unHl permanent erosion controls are established.
�❑ Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or crifical areas, buffer zones,
trees and drainaqe courses. i
�, � Provide notes, speciflcaUons, or atfachments describing the following:
• Consfruction, opera6on and maintenance of eroslon and sediment controls, include inspection frequency; I
• Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetafion, and storage and disposal of ':
excavated or cleared material; -
• Spec�ptions for vegeiafive cover & mulch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertilization;
� Provisions�fortemporaryand/orpermanentlrtiqation. � �
�❑ Perform clearing and earth moving adivitles only durinq dry weather.
�❑ Use sediment controls or filtrafion to remove sediment when dewater(ng and obtain all necessary permits. �
�❑ Protect all storm drain inlets in vicinity of site using sedimeni controls such as berms, fiber rolis, or fllters. i.
�� Trap sediment on-site, usi�g BMPs such es sediment basins or traps, earlhen dikes.or berms, silt fences,
check dams soil bfankets or mats covers for soif stock plles etc.
�❑ Divert on-site runoff around exposed areas; diveit off-site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes). �
i:
�❑ Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construCfion impacts using vegetative buffer strips,
sediment barriers or filters dikes mulching or other measures as appropriate.
�❑ Limit construction access routes and s[abilize designated access points.
�, ❑ No cfeantng, fueling, or maintaining vehides on-site, excepf in a designated area where washwafer is ' ,
contained and treated.
�l, ❑ Store handle �and'dispose of construction materials/wastes properly to prevent contad with stormwater.
� � Contractor shalf train and provide instruction to all employeeslsubcontracfors re: conshuction BMPs:
����� �� Control and �prevent the.dissharge of ali pofenQal pollutants, induding pavement cutting wastes,.paints, .
concrete, petroieum products, chemicais, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architectural copper, and i
non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses. ,
Name of applicanl completing the
7
E.
staff use
�
t_ V NS ' 4 ?.O,k � `p ii, I �
,- � e. >k . �
F. ��/x�aR ��G�rTaL-rtc� � co+°%L� �oy' M�Af�K�'0 G�'S oP. �� Inoucn O,U7JJ� �
OTES (for municipai sfaff use only): p�t �+�d �����'�� L r Si �/ LA/J �711�� ��• � 1�����
/� J
Secfion A Notes: n�/ � ,
Section B Notes:
6 My connedion to the senitary sewer system is subject to sanitary d�strict approval.
� Businessesthat may have outdoor process actNllieslequlpment include machine shops, auto repatr, Induslries with pretreafinent fadlities.
3 �
� , ApprovedDecember4,2012 ,
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
June 6, 2013
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
i� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650J 558-7204
, �..
u�.:�
�� M
�yR N
.p�+m �
L�� ~
z
�� �
� �
�-�-.�`,
Planning Staff
Request for Design Review Amendment for changes to a previously
approved first and second story addition to an existing single family
dwelling at 2202 Summit Road, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-340
June 10, 2013
1 Stormwater requirements are required to be implemented at stand-alone single
mily home projects that create and/or replace 2,500 sq.ft. or more of impervious
surface. These requirements are in addition to any City requirements. To determine if
this project is subject to those requirements complete and return the attached
"Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects." For additional information about these
requirements please refer to the attached flyer "New Stormwater Control
Requirements Effective 12/1/12" and by visiting the San Mateo County Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) website at:
http://flowstobay.org/bs_new_development. ph p#flyers
2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's
NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction
activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and
effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When
submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as projec[
notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project
proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this
requirement. Electronic file is available for download at:
http://www.flowstobay. org/d ocu ments/business/construction/Countywide_Prog ram_B
M P_Plan_Sheet_Jun2012.pdf
3) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using
architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer
"Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at:
http:!/www.flowstobay. org/documents/municipalities/nd/Materials/2012%20Materials/
Architectural_copper_BMPs_FI NAL.pdf
w
>
R �
G Ur
-, z
G. Z
�
m
�c
G�
UJ
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727
Reviewed by: SD � Date: 6/13/13
��
��
SAN MATEO COUNTYWIOE
Water Pollution
Prevention Program
Clean Wamc Healthy Cammuni�y.
Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Construcfion projects aze required to implement the stormwater best management pracrices (BMP) on this page,
as they apply to your project, all yeaz ]ong.
Materials & Waste Management
NomHmallom MnerlaU
❑ BCIIIIOMfAvtISIMLpi1[SO�IDIM.dinM011ltt[OnSpYC110�inikNll
miiAmpxwM1cnninisf nuifroixiiwytcm6���iiM1in
iaa.s
� Uw (bm don i ortrvtt) RCWimW naicr fmduu wmrol.
HanrJou�hlekrial�
o �.xiwinma�:m.m,ei,Newnm�.o��s�(skn�.
O���spinu.ihwieitwFeau.f I.ail.utlaniilrtue)in
sccardenaniv4eny.wu�uy,mic W fedaalrcgWmioiu
O Siort FoxvNo�u momneb vntl�wY[s in m¢nigM1monoinvn, s�ort
�eoo�.m ���dan� �o�m,�M��� a�a �o�r.uti�� a uM ��d or
nrn' n'wY dey mdunnp x�si �vmtMoe �rM1m nin is fpecan
0 Fallw� m�nufanum iepplim�iw imuu��bn fm Ime�doi¢
rc.e�emae.�cwi,,,�uvcmeRwn��y. oo„u
apDlv charvmt�aultlaw� rvM1ra �ain u fuaae� H�i�M1in U M1oun.
o•�u raave�w�u� a�ro�� ormi nem�ao,v ��.,:��,.
WantFLvaEmral
o co.R.��i<a��s.i m�mm�rs��2p�,.�m iw:m uKma or
�.m wo�t d.y om e��d�a �.., „�mme.,
O CAeetuaeeEuprolwnmiMesfrtqurn�lylwkaksendiomeke
wrc uKr.R �«o..�u<a. ue,vmr ao�.�, a�vAR.� uK
O Cleen mrtP� P�ae ioil<is.autl uupen Jcm frcquen�ly for
len4 pntl ryills.
❑ Di�posofdl nssies �od Eehns p�opMy. ReyGc marcruh eM
��vw�M1wrvnbem�ckd(sW ssaspMll.wrcm.�c.vpgcy��e6ve
mmern4.•ma dvhv4 nirc.uc.)
O D'upott NliquW midun frvm pvinu. J�innen wl�'mb. eluee. end
tlmNng Mitle m M1emNounradc.
CoMrvc�lon Emrnw �nJ Pcrimaer
O Fnebli�Amp munuu�� eti�e pemm�ereonimb vq smbilix ell
wmwcuon ewem.e. ona eo n m w t6ekn i�v emov� emsan n ne
.�a�u��a�n��wr .�mdwwcu�aoRNm.
a s.�ena.,«w�w,.�nu�u�.Mmeaw�h�ara�e
v4imrnt mvice w pnem fuMauarkin6 NnrrM1oseEm�m m��e
m��wuo�u�g
Equipment Management &
Spill Control
M�tinlrn�va.xdPyWnQ �
❑ Uaiyuiewuu,finetl�vi�heOP�Me¢BMPxfm
rMicl<eM e9uipm<n� pul:ioe dq siwege.
❑ earwmmjmmcaum.�,�.,�,;.nucma.<nK��
uN eqoiPnm� aetltin6 oR�iR
❑ 1lrtfuelinQor�xtickmemwenmmuuhEme
miie, n�oel in e 6enxCvw o��ay fmm zm�m dmin�
entl o�¢reEnO P� bi6 moueh la wllu� puiEs.
Rm�ck a Nsqve ot B uiN u hvnNws nae¢.
o v.a'c�eo.�w�A,�wum�memwn.aovewn�rc.
ciwn xi�h xa¢ro�' in a bem�eda�m tlut..ill ro�
elbn' ri�w wvttr ro �un inw gunen, ao-cns. ��o�m
� aitiv.or:wGamakrs.
0 oomicie�.u;ck«ew�o�N�+m�o¢w,p..
mhm b, degrtueiy ��wn <lemm6 eqivprcet �c.
9
Spill Pm�cmion xM Coniml
❑ I:cePaqlleleanuPmn¢rieh(my,ebso�henu.erc.)
�.tihbk n iM1e mnvnr uen yi¢ ai all iimc�.
a m:a +.<nKwAa<w�w�m�r�w�urr �a
^�irlee6pmmpt4'. UUErippwmwrcAluks
� inrtp��neRmoa.
O Cleonupepil�mkaLsimmWukl�'oMtiapnrteof
naMvmm�t�wor�+�r.
O Nm�IczJr�ns�wmKrtOu'MfN�c�pllk6
um an co-m�n mcmm. Ucwncm �m:,i.. rm
IiIkGeMlpmgiJ.
O SrvrepupspillcddrvmMeriebimmMu¢Iy.Doroi
vy lo �ruM1 �M1em msy vill�walv.>ywy �Aem.
� ClavoOWiWmdina�M�d89�8�Putl
pmperty Obpovw6 ofeomamieauWwLL
O RepoeldgNflrav�sqO�Mmedloieh.Youuertq�weC
by I�x' lo rtponnll ilpiifimnt rtlwv ofAvwtlom
mavia� ialWmBoil. To rtponaipil:l) D'W 911
«YowbW �iove��]'rtNowe�bu.AGlliAe
cmcmm: o�mar�e�ncr se..;� µy,,,;,,g
Cenuv,(91�yB1E�]SSOR��oun).
Storm drain
Earthwork & Paving/Asphalt Work
Contaminated
Soils
� ------:o—___
(,I, :
� � i< G;t
...n.d�°a';Sl. ��_ ,. � - �
?3 - ��..i_... (
EmsionCanlml
❑ SJ¢tlWe p�King voEnu��uon nbh fm
ay.mno-ooy.
O Suhitiss ell ticmdM vs¢s, ivull �od
nmu�� iunronp� wsion m�wi. (vucn
m�im wn W I(vbric o� boahtl fi bm
m mv)unul v<gomrim isam6liaM1e].
O $utl aplem �<gwuovlorco�ion
mnuul oo sbpexarxtertm�umeiioo is
nal immdwelY 0��
smimm� Cammi
O P�dcl�wemLniumku.Bwm.Eivdn.
�e a�.a� �„xi..;m wwowt m
BMP; rutl� u gmro� begi fEer mlls.
xmi:.nc.
O PevuuuEimmtfiommigntioLoPaYe
by innnlliW w! meuvuvioyr.N'ment
womok wch n 6Ec m05 41� fercx m
maimrnitm�w.
❑ r,ao�.m.eim�ao��dm.n.Rn
�vill nq wileu inw iM1e svee�
❑ Trmsfcurankdmuvielsadump
w�ls on ihe n rc. ea in iM1 e me��.
O �PownimlN $oi15
❑ If uy of �M1e folb��ingwMiuw eR
ohu�atl, �a fa womimuon uM
cooGGl Wc Reb�dR4kl Qwlnv
Gnwl &�e�d: �
. unmuel wl comivov. aluotamumi,
arabr.
• AbmidmedvoEeyewd u��.
• nemaorce �¢
• BuiiMb.ne4deb.ix w v�.
❑ A�niGpringonExel woiinginncl
nnJ�u, wnFen nin u fwwn beforc
4ch Fe�smcu xill Fnrc �imc w cwc.
O Covo-ummdreininlcuaMmmM1Wu
when epplYmB �I �mt uck cmi.ztu�
ud.fog�ul.uc.
O Col�m W �ecycleeroPNPo�uIy
tlywc ofrscw ahuirt pv�Lm uM.
Uo NOT mrrq or nvh ii in�o gwien.
O Do����niaionoshtlo��nRcsli
asPlnu conca¢ wvemcn�
S�n�unine&,1�pIWUCm�Me Amimvl
O Con�plemlyenaorbe�rictlenwm
amini�euxArnwrvcnnin& ��N¢r
febnq uuA buin inlp Glvn. or gm�xl
biQtblap 9Nry WI O(IAC Pq0 Enin
ry�we.
❑ Shm<I. abomN. w weuum metim
a,�,y Qe a� ormi .vm �.eo�
u you ert f nishcE in ux lantion ar oi
We W WexLaohdey(whicMeru
moncll.
❑ umNwi u�m�m�. vun m,��. �i�
ilupYllmWiYlel),
be liable for fines of up to $1
Concrete, Grout & Mortar
Applicafion
a so2��.ca,�,�amowomu
m plku utl onT'tmm Enin�yc
acv. Th�a ma¢riah mmi n<mrtmcF e
AWNErJin.
o ww� o�� w�w"e �aw�„�w�a.
oRvrt m w a pnuiwJ erts, m We�e
rodifeFergeimoNeooEeekingmil
oronmmmoumingartaz. Lu mncic¢
naec� ene a�.pow or �s s,.ms�.
❑ CaI4cuM1c o�urA �v wfmm �voJ�ing
uwswete2cu•ru�mama� �<n
r =vemo�me�ewui�Rsm.
Dewatering
f
Y
❑ �rmu.<ir n�n�usc.n m�on an �
rvnoR•.iJ�in Ne si¢. ontl all wmRNei
e�n,.�, rAm n�� �m. o�.m �w�,
nvafmm aR i¢ mry' fmm a116xW�trE
ttmhmi¢w�vewmpliorce.
❑ WM1en Orn'emfin& na�ifY aM oblein
aPpa"s� hm� IM1e IaW mwicipali�.
� divJwginO��'�Iv101srtxiPNltt
«.w,o a�. riv,uo�aa���rs;o„
Wmogha Wtin.laN',yu6menitrap
���„ m my,,;rca.
❑ InarcntYfYnoxnCo��Wnirotien.INing
+: Rw+w v�w �o..,�: o. a�,wm< or
gmimdrvm¢Cauuliwi�hWcE jncsrm
dmm�ine��Iwvluupine�+rtqui�W oM
ea. �o �mm�<i.�.�iu c��.�����ka
yA��m.,in m�,� a u�ua o. x,mm
aP�si�c fw O�M+�al
0.000 ner davl
PainKng & Paint Removal
. , .Ta'. ... , .:4 ^�. :. N'
I ' �. �
.
e�immF �i�nup
❑ N�,Y�neo�e��:n�o�a�uw;�,
wmeinmmausuem guna,xlom�
tl�'Jin ofsu,(�[tu'olcrs
OFa •�imburdpinu. Snilw �bwM1cs
mWcev¢mpassihle.Ri �Iw
wn�um cnerorcc.u� ne.�s s���m
pcnnission fmm uw tachv�i¢neiv
�rcem�en� aulMrip�. Nnvpwrt p.{n�
am� ,m.�
O Fw u1.WUE Winu. pim w� hu�M1cf w
Ne encm possiblcand [I�nn aiW �M1imcr
alvml in o p�op[ttw�uue�. FiIW uW
ue IM1inw� nndmhrnls. Di�pou af
...:evc ud ���eei. manmw�ams u
wamde�s a�ue.
Peinlmnu�al
a cnemirai w�� miw��a reswu� om
�nip� nna emi u� m.n�c pa;nis �,
punuwnuinin8lW diribW��lunmun
bc dispmcE d�s brudom �row.
o va�m mum Me ami r�m �maP.�mam
a��:man��e a�a v�a emnms ��,y e�
r"<D� ��P a m11xuE in plasiic Emp
tloJuuW Eispcui otu wL�.
Landscape Mxterials
� "w
-_ f��?.�
O Caonin qocl:PileE IandsuPiny maerwlx
by siorin8 �K�n uMer b�ry �.M1cn iFcq m
d rc�i.rl}' Eein8uml.
❑ sua wa�m. iNa�.x m=�mm o�
wiin., ewe. n vo2 wc.c mmcm�:
wFm Nw ert na acueele tringuud«
aP0lied
❑ oivnnn��c owr�eo� oru�s sma;m�
bndmw maivi.� xiumi 1 an�� befeR a
roRwi n�� ���i «e�n�s.�v..d�m
�
�aw w�rucauxrrwm�
i�1�2t6f PO��Il210I1
P+'evention Program
Opn W�ur. M�h4y [omrunhg.
Requirements for Architectural Copper
Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing!
Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life
Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes
into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts,
especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination
solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown
typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to
remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants.
Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the
insfallation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper.
Use Best Management Practices (BMPs)
The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be implemented to prevent prohibited
discharges to storm drains.
During lnstallation
• If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory.
• If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs:
o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the
rinse water does not flow to fhe street or storm drain.
Block off storm drain inlet if needed.
o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump fo the sanitary
sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before
discharging to the sanitary sewer.
� Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for
proper disposal.
Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious
coating that prevents further. corrosion and runoff. This wili
also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring
less maintenance.
During Maintenance
Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof,
re-patination or re-application of impervious coating:
• Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains.
• Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local
sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal.
Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself!
If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non-
stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing
copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal
stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine.
Contact Information
The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at
www.flowstobay.orq (click on "Business", then "New DevelopmenY', then "local permitting agency").
FINAL February 29, 2012
gutter and drarnpipe.
prohi6ited discharge. The watermustbe
pumped and disposed of properly.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, VARIANCE AND
HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
September 9, 2013, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other
written materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is
no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on
the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 (e)(2),
which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review,
provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas
where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is
located is not environmentally sensitive, is hereby approved.
2. Said Design, Variance and Hillside Area Construction Permit are approved subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review,
Variance and Hillside Area Construction Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes,
and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9'" dav of Seatember. 2013 by the
following vote:
Secretary
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, Variance and Hillside Area
Construction Permit.
2202 Summit Drive
Effective September 19, 2013
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division
date stamped August 20, 2013, sheets A.0 through A.5 and date stamped August 30,
2013, sheets A.6 and A.7; and that all new windows shall be vinyl clad or aluminum clad
wood windows;
2. that any changes to
roof height or pitch,
Planning Division or
by Planning staf�;
building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features,
and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to
Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or
garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an
amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 31 and June 11, 2013 memos, the
City Engineer's June 25, 2013 memo, the Fire Marshal's June 10, 2013 memo, the City
ArborisYs August 2 and June 14, 2013 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's August
1 and June 13, 2013 memo shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project
shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community
Development Director;
6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall
be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District;
that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project
construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of
approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall
remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process.
Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall
not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City
Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and
that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects
to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, Variance and Hillside Area
Construction Permit.
2202 Summit Drive
Effective September 19, 2013
Page 2
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural
certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be
evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the
approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with
approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing
inspection shall be scheduled;
12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division;
and
13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
�CITY OF BURLINGAME
COMMUNIN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE f20AD
� BURLINGAME, CA 94010 i- , _
+ PH:(650) 558-7250 � FAX:(650) 696 3790
www.budingame.org „'_ -' �'"': '
;r..• �;�,:,.:,�-- _
�' ` f � �: Ey'•;�,�; :_.'. -.
'l ':=
Site: 2202 SUMMIT DRIVE i'` �:� 4-`°�-'��`-
The City of Burlingome Planning Commission announces the
following public hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9,
2013 at 7:00 P.M. in ihe City Hall (ouncil Cham6ers, 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for Design Review, Variance for 6uilding
height ond Hillside Area Consirudion PermiT for o first
and secand story addition ta an existing single family
dwelling at 2202 SUMMIT DRIVE zoned R-l.
APN 021-211-340
Mailed: August 30, 2013
(Please refer fo other side)
... °3il �. :.
' __ F.un�. � .
;; ?Gsi::.:=_
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
City of Burlingame
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, Califomia.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
(Please refer fo other side)
� V
'L/6 70A dYW 730NGH � . , x �n. �" : � �� ys � � � \ �� ^,aQ
°<� �\
97/SS 70i1 dYIY 7d.�UYd � � O �� =d o.. ��y 3r�' �+> � �.n v \`�
� . ,i o .ro�r t n1
' 99/f9 70�1 d NW 73J.YYd � � . " '� � ,�0� r�9" \ c` . �
K S' a "N
Y� z eF /
/ R � . � `�� O �.L2. � £ O ' � .an h� �
W ' < ' � ' - 4,t '� y�, .t
. °�` . Z ' � qg '� y� Ft 11���5 f`F:` Y�! �D'�YS''
' /E "* � � P�i� ' r °, ° \ �� .
>^�M . y^ e �p a O ,� v
�� 3� .st 5.�`° �%M nMi Gc o `
' .�0��.�� .S, % �T Pd .Ke� `� . 'o� � olx�tl ) �� � 9��' � ¢ .
�, . „e : �c � p ., ai . . �, � � 6/ � R .
.ez � r�.% c s ... s ��. �,e� Z
� .f5t . .�k4'lj.^9 aaq�� faia .OF.Ie ftl �GII S} dC
p41 a i �2. .�} ��� m.nn .�s'u : OZ
,y �� ei Q3
. o�a .'[ o y� � 5 0/ O 9[ ~ � l�' - :
��5 . o�.� .�ti Psi`a, �� SC � P f f. Y•/d'NYd 'Nld w t�ffl
ro°;cs�� C S d�� �( " y ,�°�w-zz �ure � , e:w,�b���� a
x �! . - �
. �p � ,"" u �,,r ��qe-zzere ,, y B/ � ..
, ;r � ' �
�' 7 � z� _ .�u .¢o
.iy� �..�' � Z/ m!e p�cai
9 y. ,o,� s X ie
�� . . �,T .o� C �e. o,n
9 v6 4n . . ' If5Z/ .I�SY .09
; A
;� O 4° a ' u� ND Y-C7 ]3JNYd 'F ` WW q
1S/O 700HJS 3WY`JN/7Hn9 .g,,� �°'�q, 9� �� �� -_ .�
. . = Y �o c . ," L/ 0
. . .11'LI3.II.il.6fM'.� ' O w �
� ,Y ILZ Fy ^N
w� h C_ Z �`0 6 .seiai
��. � O `a 4 e-ez �a�a✓d a.oc:o.csn
BZ - �oai�s aanooH ��t. � °� a ,:`y` � � ,
O w �n M
' a p ' /l � `�°
�L �
. .r,r g �ne., a,u� . .
ai . 'Qiri 1MlJ �`1fi1 s' Of
,00/
f/ g �i
� �b �-FZ 73JtlYd
4 . v�
„'� ��0 liwWns ZozZ—� °`fi: +
r
E`L .
' a
"t
O �+^� ' '
"� " a.4( `..
i �
e�ayJa�.�. o .cc'ol a9y��t f/
�7�7 . <� hr� !y� .00-�e
LG—LG r^r, � _ — — —
—N3l1V 300� XNl
I
J, . . � ,��r , i . g :��_ , �_^ .� ` .e'�. , ��... � P'�o ,,"s.
v
,�'� '� � r ' } 1�` �oa.3� �.-'r . . _ ..1 /" I ,; ' F' n'�
i w �, t y. �, .
�- r c a , �a �'" . � za°x ;; � C
ez z� rz,. p '-� i. �
_ .. . .. � n> ii. o�. . �.;2r �. , <: ea, .� ..
,.,, ; , , .,. , � '�u r ra,�, H� '
=� •
4 'F' ' . w�� - . . i � � �`� ~ ,r
w � t a . � ' ,. •�,� . ': ..:1p,5'
' f. �,1 .� �� 4JT7.i1 _ � .�, I . .� '"
"L - . "9 _ i ,. �,,R .� �eia , z�,ii �
I� "^'_.y _. U' y � p� ,r�` ���'�.
n . � . � '. . nyi6e, - � - � .d . � W�g g� , �� t
-,��I '�.
�� � t�u�' u ;� ' . ,9 �`�
�'; ,
. 1 3 � - zo� -- �'1&0 � : ` �:, ' rd'.d �:: ' ` 'o
, . � , ,a�o ��r, � ��x1tii , MIT. ;c@/�.=
� _
; . �.
.
. ;�, � .
_ y.y� � :i�
.. . � r*�J � \ . zea� - � .¢frt� n / :i "yio
_ 1 '' i_r �` Y ( .
I f�
r� - .: , ,.., _k�f�' ,s �- C7�NYON Rt7 �t,,° ae�.� •: ' Y _ ..
� .��- 2Ri5 . '�•. y
1 . . . . - . ' � I .. . 2W I . � '�6j.. .
eo� -i '- . �.�,..
r'��� � �' � � .�{�':..� ! <8����
-G � � 1 illc� -
� � k t �, ' ' � . �,
.r
a�Y� �; �' L. - , . . � M�-(.- RD _ � ;C �\_ `
y 1 \
9 \�yf.„y,�
� O . . � �U n,�,Y � \ �� � /I
•' �� \ �
� \ ""nt.�
o � 4; �
.� . ' .2'a . . 11'e .�.Y � ,� ` I � � rV \t .
5
�3 :'� b'�, t �' � . . .. , j.a:..
�,.,�:.''' , r �� � r',' � �
„� r , � "n . _'; .—,�-�, a � ;; , ..: ��
,
, � �- �'�� . � . � �
1 • �i
- 4�
�0 1 ,� ' ����I ��� Y� „/, bf R \i
.
�1W „/ . , . � ,y� . � � .
t*. ...n� y .
/ �
.�, * 7 \
�' : � :,i;.
1i�+� ��h //..� i.. ' ,
� � � �'V d . .. � . . �..
, ��P�� , \ , ° 1� ` � � � :2 <;'�
0
' `ov _(�Fi cjc4��; ' .:�' . .
i: � \t ii � �. ,'".� � .
� �'�\ V
�.�a � � �; `� ��� ' � �"��' 22.02 � ;� � i�
�� _ � .:„� , �
_ .�,� ,; :.�� , � ',
, �i� t
'� x �.. . _ rri� 1. �ry� ..
o'�� . . ,. . . . �
r9.� . ,; :?� "�,, .
' A , .. �, v l� � �: .
'1 q
''�e „� � ' ��.�. �s`r�r '+ , � `, _ .
t' �� � � � 3Wu, '� .�. �• � � . � ..
i . aol�� y ,� ` h ', ��� .
1 ���:vY 1� . p, .�� `�� �� `2' ..e�A' ' ��� .. . ��
�° �_ 1� � '� ,. .r� _
'�. � �� � �� � � � � � .
r 1 ,� � `.1 � �
i4 ' v <'� ;��F� ' � r �3` � y,
z
� \ � .�, ^
1, o, ' � :��,
�i., a . ..` ��� ..
�' � �P'�� � + /' i:� " ; � F� \�� DR
.. � � '. } l. y _
; � �. � � r
'� k�
, ,
r�:i � p ^ , ,'�'". /> _, c . -^w , ^� �, ` «�,�`!� n . 1 � -
o � \, ._ ��,� ; .. ��. �„� � l4 � c4y'+�, � • �
� � �� . , o� y►� ,
�
�{ j �
` �L.. �� .,�'... .r'} l . i 4 . _.. ... __ ........ _I
�- 1
� � �� r :, � � � -� � �
�`. � . . � �,; � � , y, � �: 1 . . .
_
� � t � ~�, k .. >. .
�1