HomeMy WebLinkAbout2202 Summit Drive 2 of 3 - Approval Letter��; CITY p
A
BURLINCiAME
� � �e
� aus�•
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
The City of Burlingame
, CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997
January 7, 2003
Warren Donald
2202 Summit Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear NIr. Donald,
TEL: (650)558-7250
FAX: (650) 6963790
Since there was no appeal to or suspension by the City Council, the December 9, 2002 Planning Commission
approval of your applicarion for a mitigated negative declazation and creek enclosure pernut became effective
January 6, 2003. This applicarion was to allow for an 82-foot extension of an existing culvert at 2202 Summit
Drive, zoned R-1.
The December 9, 2002 minutes of the Planning Commission state that your application was approved with the
following conditions:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
July 16, 2002, sheets C-1 through C-3, and da2e stamped Mazch 6, 2002, sheet L-1 (Landscape Plan);
2. that the property owner shall keep the portion of the creek located at 2202 Summit Drive cleaz of debris
and shall maintain the 30-inch reinforced concrete pipe and protection structures on the�� ^r.eperty tc insure
free flow of the creek and to min;mize erosion; �
3. that the conditions of the City Engineer's September 20, 2002, August 21, 2002, May 1, 2002, and May 21,
2001 memos, and the City Arborist's August 12, 2002, memo shall be met;
4. that the project shall comply with the Construcrion and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan
and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a shuchue, interior or exterior, shall
require a demolition permit;
5. that the condition of the existing sanitary sewer line should be investigated and repaired as necessary;
6. that work on the existing creek shall be performed only during the "dry" season (May tUrough October) to
reduce the potential for slope failures during the excavation work and the possible need for dewatering (in
addition to the diversion of the creek flow);
January 7, 2003
2202 Sununit Drive
Page 2
7. that a geotechnical engineer should be engaged during the work to observe the excavation cuts and provide
advice on the need for shoring of the existing improvements until all the fill has been placed;
8. that the fill placement and compaction work shall be performed in a"dry" condition;
9. that removal of rocks, boulders, loose and unconfined soil and rock debris, vegetation, organic soils, and
other debris and rubble from the creek bottom and sides shall be reviewed in the field by the project
geotechnical engineer at the time the work is in progress;
10. that portions of the existing rip rap shall be removed where it has been undermined;
11. that ground areas that aze disturbed during the clearing operarion and other void or "hollow" azeas shall be
properly backfilled using the native soil and rock, or approved import soil, by compacting the bacl�ill
material to a Minimum Relative Compaction of not less than 90% of the Maximum Dry Density as
deternuned by ASTM Test Procedure D1557;
12. that native soils and rocks (acceptable for use as fill material) and 'unport fill material should be placed in
layers, no Uricker than 8 inches, moisture-conditioned, and compacted;
13. that prior to use on the site, all import fill material shall be submitted to the geotechnical engineer for
inspection, testing (as necessary), and final approval for use on the site;
14. that the rip rap shall be underlain by a filter fabric to help reduce the potential for future erosion and loss of
the soil under the rip rap caused by water infiltration;
15. that the surface of the new fill section should be provided with a means to minimize erosion of the neaz-
surface soils;
16. that the existing surface drain pipes shall be connected into new collector pipes that are routed to the
upstream, int,,�ke� end�f the culvert or the new downstream surface drain inlet;
17. that the house roof downspouts shall be connected into a closed pipe system that discharges directly in the
new culvert pipe;
18. that the surFace grading of the fill surface shall be constructed so that the ground slopes down to the new
intake structure from the upstream side of the surface "ridge" line, and towazd the new surface drain inlet,
downstream from the "ridge" line. The ground surface shall be sloped at a minimum gradient of 5% away
from the "ridge" line;
19. that all applicable requirements of NPDES for runoff and drainage will be adhered to in the design and
during construction;
20. that the applicant shall submit a grading plan and erosion control plan for review and approval by the City
Engineer;
January 7, 2003
2202 Summit Drive
Page 3
21. that the applicant shail submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing Best Management
Practices (BMP's) to be used to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system; the plan
shall include a site plan showing the properiy lines, existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to
be disturbed, locations of cuUfill and soil storage/disposal azeas; areas with existing vegetatian to be
protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures; watercourse or sensitive areas on-site or
immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout
azeas;
22. that off-site runoff shall be diverted azound the construcrion site and all on-site runoff shall be diverted
azommd exposed construction areas;
23. that methods and procedures such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or berms, silt fences, straw
bale dikes, check dams storm drain inlet protecrion soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to
stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion.controls and sediment control
continuously until permanent erosion controls have been established;
24. that the erosion and sedimentation conirol plans should include notes, specifications, and/or attachments
describing the construcrion operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures, including
inspection frequency; methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling clearing of vegetative cover
and mulch, including methods and schedules for planting and fertilizarion; and provisions for temporary
and permanent irrigation;
25. that no vehicles or equipment shall be cleaned, fueled or maintained on-site, except in designed azeas
where nwoff is contained and treated;
26. that all clearing lnnits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones trees, and drainage
courses aze clearly delineated with field markers or fencing and that adjacent properties and undisturbed
areas are protected &om construction impacts with vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters,
dikes or mulclvng;
� .—�
27. that clearing, earth moving activiries and the application of pesricides and fertilizers shall be performed
only during dry weather (April 15 through October 15);
28. that the site shall be periodically sprayed with water to control dust during grading and conshuction;
29. that conshvcrion equipment emissions shall be in compliance with the standards of the Bay Area Air
Quality Management District;
30. that prior to any work in the creek bed, the applicant shall obtain a Streambed Alterarion Permit from the
State Department of Fish and Game;
31. that prior to any work in the creek bed, the appiicant sha11 obtain a Protected Tree Removal Permit from the
City of Burlingame for any trees 48-inches in circumference or lazger;
32. that prior to any work in the creek bed, the applicant shall apply for and obtain all necessary permits from
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers;
January 7, 2003
2202 Summit Drive
Page 4
33. that unless no construction on days of religious meetings is requested by ihe nearby religious center,
construction hours shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekdays, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Sahudays,
and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays, per the requirements of the City of Burlingame
Municipal Code. If requested conshvction shall not occur during times of scheduled religious meetings;
and
34. that should any cuitural resources be discovered during construction, work shall be halted until they are
fully investigated by a professional accepted as qualified by the City Planner and the recommendations of
the expert have been executed to the satisfaction of the City.
All site improvements and construction work will require separate application to the Building Department. This
approval is valid for one yeaz during wlrich time a building pernut must be issued. One extension of up to one
year may be considered by the Planning Commission if application is made before the end of the first year.
The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6. Ifyou wish to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, you must do so within 90 days
of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law.
Sincerely yours,
��.�1 11�W V�
Mazgazet Monroe
City Planner
z2ozs�.�8
c. Dave Luzuriaga, P.E., LTI Inc., engineer
1840 EI Camino Real
Burlingame, CA 94010
Cluef Building Inspector
Cluef Deputy Valuation, Assessor's Office
(2.622 AC MOL PTN OF PAR 23-C PM VOL 4/7; APN: 027-271-340)
MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
September 20, 2002
To: Pl De nt
From: V to , ngineering Division
Subject: Pl eview for 2202 Summit Drive
We have co eted the review of the resubmittal dated September 1 S, 2002 and the response to
comment #2 is acceptable.
There are no. fiuther comment for this project except that prio
applicaut shall provide the City with compliance documents wi
Game and the Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Boazd
control plan shall also be submitted. And an encroachment
Division is also required.
Cc: Syed Murtuza, City Engineer
Phil Monaghan, Senior Civil Engineer
r to the start of construction,
th the Department of Fish and
. A grading plan and emsion
permit from the Engineering
U:\VICTORIP�ojedslPrivate�2202Summitl.wpd
MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
August 21, 2002
To: Planning Department
Fmm: Victor Voong, Engineering
Subject: Planning Review for 2202 �
We have completed the review of the resubmittal dated July 17, 2002 and the following are
supplemental comments in addition to the previously made comments dated May 1, 2002.
1. The project plans shall include a note that the property owner(s) sball be �sgovsible for the
maintenance of the new storm drain pipe per City comment #1 dated May 21, 2U01.
2. The hydraulic calculations dated May 7, 2001 shall be wet stampeci by a licensed
civil engineer. Although the calculations show that pipe size to be adequate, no
calculations or studies were submitted to identify any adverse impacts of the proposed
creek enclosure to the upstream and downstream of the project site. This information is
required as pazt of the determination whether a creek enclosure pernut can be granted.
3. The applicant shall obtain a pernut from the California Department of Fish and Game per
City comment dated May 21, 2001. A permit from the Army Corp of Engineers is aiso
required.
4. An encroachment permit ftom the Public Works Department-Engineering Division is
required prior to start of construction for work withiu any existing public easements. As a
condition of approval, legal description and �ot plan are required for dedication of the
proposed new 15' wide storm drain easemeu4 as shown on pmject plans. .:..
5. The proposed grading will require a grading permit for which a grading plan shall be_
submitted prior to the issuauce of the Building pernut.
Cc: Syed Murh�a, City Engineer
Phil Monaghaa, Senior Civil Engineer
Fred Cullum, Chief Building Inspector
Tom McGovem, Deputy Building Inspector
u:N�croRwroJedswrivate�2zozsarmnitwpa �
.,. .` . •', L
ROUTING FORM
DATE: April 5, 2002
TO: ✓�t��i���s-' �rev�bo5
_Chief Building Of6cial
Fire Marshal
Recycling Specialist
_City Arborist
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
�ON�men� Q�I..I.�l
SUBJEC'T: Request for negaave declacaaon aiid creek enclosure permit to enclose an e�dsting creek at
2202 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APNc 027-271-340.
STAFF REVIEW: n/a
(���- ��3 aJ s/��l ��� -�M+�(.
� , � _ , • �.
GS : • ,..=. . �r � � � .
i.. - '` �� � � � ,
/�'� � � , ... : � .
�' i : , r' —,%' ' _ ' •
.
i.;a ,� � �� 1'
':� fi tr11�' � ii e i � 'I i,_ . , 1Y .i � - :�� �
1
�.a� ��).
� � u��c- ��.a,� � —� �;� �a��
� � t� w iu.- � �b � � td�ou�-r�
� � ,�us�an �,�'��
Reviewed By: V� V• Date of Comments: '7L" �L�Y
ROUTING FORM
DATE: May 10, 2001
TO: ✓
_Cluef Building Officiat
Fire Marshal
Recycling Specialist
City Atborist
_City Attorney
FROM: . Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for negaave declaration and creek enclosure permit to enclose an eaasting creek
at 2202 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-340.
STAFF REVIEW: Monday, May 14, 2001
� 1 /�Ec, S, fl. � t�L� S�rou<�J �E f'1R�.� �qi,rd4 7jY c c'„=,�
/
27� %�E.✓ L,.rc`. �✓a E� do: ff-AA£y1 To (i� GJ/T�F '
/
!-i( TH.� G�' /0� TJ2Ai•v�16� ErydE� <-✓ i G�//.crl
�v�w..� r T�r�' L��c. OP�/ cN-r-r�t�L .
�), �k�,.
w/c.�
�ou.i� d f 30 YEiit �Go ci IK%f/GN
Dv�2 - To/� %F6�sFlurr�c .
�{ 1 lil�e owrtJ�t sl.�e.l� � scr�t�e1`� � axJ
l
cfa.r�qt tuoo/�i ��oyn �� Cr�.cic c�+.c�
S trw � il�GQ/1'�� d� Q6�fM 'f ��� IGt f
) °7°P m�,� � �
�i7lt �' G-a.,�+e_ . �t� .
Reviewed By: p�s� Date of Comments: r- 2�-0/
ROUTING FORM
DATE: July 17, 2002
TO: _City Engineer
_Cluef Builcling Official
Fire Marshal
Recycling Specialist
�City Arborist
City Attomey
FROM: Planning Staff
n
SUBJECT: Request for creek enclosure pemut to extend an existing culvert at 2202 Summit Drive,
zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-340.
STAFF REVIEW:
,F�,u� ,�zF�s mF r-`'�zeYE.�a�� s,�Z�,CB',.G,.2 m2 �eGL�E�,
SG9�d-68 �0 2 �2�tr-o v/� L � .�[ u S'r 3� BOOc�� � Gor( v+•``f"<(
�4 V��""'� � 7�-E� fL%^� a v/1 �- �pOOu'c9 tz az. .��
IReviewed By: �(�� Date of Comments: �' �a- �