HomeMy WebLinkAbout122 Stanley Road - Staff ReportCITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes November 12, 2013
3. 122 STANLEY ROAD, ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FORA NEW, TWO-STORY
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (DE NGUYEN, THE DESIGN GROUP,
APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; MR. & MRS. COSTAGLIO, PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT:
ERICA STROH R.:.
All Commissioners had wsitedA a propertyx �tiere er no ex -pa communig%6 mmissioner
DeMartini indicated sihathe� 'not in attend'" . e ti I Y! 2' 2013 esign Review eting, but he
had watched the video. R rence staff r ort d ed Nov ber 12, 013, with attachments. Associate
Planner Strohmeier prese ed the report, 'viewed criteria a d staff om 2nts. Fifteen (15) conditions
were suggested for consideration. ??,;
Vice Chair Davis opened the public hearing.
De N u e Jed
s ted the a licanfr
Decido go with a br �l,il houjdo'. Ilew h use is sdua d at the average setbao 20' 8
Was a to enlarge the hou onthe width an reate a fr t por^lat is bigger.Remo the 6 x 6 posts by` ttir6 a single post in the froSimpli the wood trim arou d t .-windows and doors.
■ Removed the deck at the Master Bedroom at the rear to elifv the look of the:vation.
Commission questions/comments: I
• Improvement from before, including the interior layout.
• Is there a reason why the stone veneer is held off the ground? On the columns it does not go down
to the deck level, and on the sides it is a few inches above the grade (Nguyen: It stops at the
foundation.) It would look better if it went all the way down and overlapped. (Nguyen: It is for
waterproofing. Eventually landscaping will cover the gap. The Building Code requires the gap to be
8 inches.) The sill plate needs to be a certain distance up, but not the stone veneer.
• There are ways to detail the stone veneer without having the big gap. With hardscape paving at the
bottom, can reduce the gap to 2 inches, or could take it all the way down and have a gap at a higher
point with weep holes to allow the water to come out from behind the stone. With the gap it makes
the stone look fake — does not look like the foundation of the house.
Happy to see the porch, and likes the changes to the front elevation.
• Doors to the den make it look like another front door. Maybe change it to a window so the front door
will be the prominent entry point. Would then allow there to be furniture on the porch —otherwise the
size of the porch and the door swing would make it hard to have room for a bench. (Nguyen:
Previously the commission has liked the doors to open to the porch. Can change it to the window,
but thinks people will be able figure out which door is the front door. There will be a custom wood
front door that highlights the main entrance, and the pathway leads to the front door. Willing to
change it to windows however.)
The rear elevation looks a bit flat without the balcony. Maybe something to give it a little relief?
Even a trellis over the French doors would help the elevation. (Nguyen: A trellis over the door would
not be practical. Would look good but over time when growing vines, they will drip down over the
doors. Not functional —wants to make sure everything is functional.) Do not have to grow things on
a trellis — sometimes they are just for shade.
• Maybe make a box window if there is enough square footage? (Nguyen: Could put a planter box
under the three windows.)
As shown the rear French doors are exposed to the weather. A trellis or awning would not only help
with the massing, but would help protect the doors.
• In previous meeting asked for clarification on size of brackets. Still looks vague on new plans.
Clarify the construction hours — not an issue starting at 8:00 a.m.? (Nguyen: Not an issue.)
City of Burlingame
Design Review
Address: 122 Stanley Road
Item No. 3
Regular Action
Meeting Date: November 12, 2013
Request: Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage.
Applicant and Designer: De Nguyen, The Design Group
Property Owner: Mr. & Mrs. Costaglio
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN: 029-282-210
Lot Area: 5,750 SF
Zoning: R-1
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 (a), which states that construction of a limited number of
new, small facilities or structures including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential
zone is exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe
constructed or converted under this exemption.
Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing single story house with an attached
garage and to build a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage. The proposed house and
detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,317 SF (0.58 FAR) where 3,340 SF (0.58 FAR) is the maximum
allowed (including covered porch and chimney exemptions). The proposed project is 23 SF below the maximum
allowed FAR and is therefore within 1 % of the maximum allowed FAR.
The project includes a new detached garage (427 SF) which will provide two code -compliant covered parking
spaces for the proposed four -bedroom house. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the
driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following
application:
Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (CS 25.57.010 a, 1).
122 Stanley Road
Lot Area: 5,750 SF
Plans date stamped: November 1. 2013
PROPOSED
ALLOWED/REQUIRED
SETBACKS
Front (1st fir):
20'-10"
20'-10" (block average)
(2nd fir):
27'-4" (to bay)
20'-10" (block average)
Side (left):
10'-0" (to 2nd story bay)
4'-0"
(right):
5'-6"
4'-0"
Rear (1st fir):
34'-7"
15'-0"
(2nd flr):
34'-7"
20'-0"
Lot Coverage:
2,103 SF
2,300 SF
36.6%
40%
FAR:
3,317 SF
3,340 SF'
0.58 FAR
0.58 FAR
# of bedrooms:
4
---
Parking:
2 covered
1 covered
(20' x 20')
(10' x 20')
1 uncovered
1 uncovered
(9' x 20')
(9' x 20')
Height.
25-0"
30'-0"
DH Envelope:
complies
CS 25.26.075
(0.32 x 5,750 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 3,340 SF (0.58 FAR)
Design Review 122 Stanley Road
Staff Comments: See attached memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire
Marshal and Stormwater Coordinator.
Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on July 22, 2013,
the Commission had several questions and comments concerning the retention of the existing front wall, the
detailing provided in the plans, the proposed six by six front porch columns and the inconsistency of the
proportion of the window pattern. It voted to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when the plans have
been revised as directed (July 22, 2013, Planning Commission Minutes).
The applicant submitted revised plans and a response letter on November 1, 2013, to address the Planning
Commission's questions and comments. The revised plans include a complete demolition of the existing single
storydwelling. Please refer to the copy of the July 22, 2013, Planning Commission minutes included in the staff
report for the list of Planning Commission questions and comments.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the
Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application,
and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific
findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning
Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the
following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
November 1, 2013, sheets T1 through GN, Landscape Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Boundary and
Topographic Survey;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or
pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning
Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff);
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the City Engineer's April 26, 2013 memo, the Chief Building Official's June 21, 2013
and April 18, 2013, memos, the Parks Supervisor's June 17, 2013 and April 25, 2013 memos, the Fire
Marshal's April 30, 2013 memo, and the Stormwater Coordinator's June 28, 2013 and April 18, 2013
memos shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed
upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not
occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the
2
Design Review
122 Stanley Road
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans
shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans
throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the
conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination
and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan
and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall
require a demolition permit;
10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence,
the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm
Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm water runoff;
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2010
Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS
PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project
architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that
demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the
architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window
locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting
framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final
framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof
ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural
details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the
approved Planning and Building plans.
Erica Strohmeier
Associate Planner
c. De Nguyen, The Design Group, 205 E. Third Avenue #300, San Mateo, CA 94401, designer.
3
Design Review
122 Stanley Road
Attachments:
Applicant's response to Commission's comments, date stamped November 1, 2013
July 22, 2013 Planning Commission Design Review Study Minutes
Application to the Planning Commission
Letter from neighbors with specific requests, date stamped July 9, 2013
Photographs of streetscape, date stamped April 15, 2013
Staff Comments
Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed)
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed November 1, 2013
Aerial Photo
4
TDG-The Design Group
205 East 3rd Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94401
Tel: (650) 483-9454; Fax (650) 357-6995
October 23, 2013
Re: New Residence @ 122 Stanley Rd.
Dear ADRB members and Planning Staff:
We have made the following revisionsTresponses to items at the meeting for the above
reference project per July 22, 2013.
Architectural:
1. Tear down the existing structural and build the new residence. So all structures to
be new.
2. The new house meet the average Setback at 20'-10"
3. Revised the new roof
4. Revised to simplify the windows trim
5. 6X6 columns are now change to single taped wood columns
6. New layout for upper and lower and no more deck at the master bedroom.
7. All the windows at the house and garage to be wood with aluminum cladding.
8. All direct vent to be vent all the way up.
9. Added floor drain notes at the garage
10. Revised Storm water checklist.
This concludes the response to items mentioned at the preliminary ADRB meeting. We
are happy to answer any final questions or comments in an effort to satisfy the
requirements of your review.
Regards,
VED
De Nguyen
P�ov
Cr7Y OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DPI.
EXCERPT —July 22, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes
122 Stanley Road (Agenda Item 3)
3. 122 STANLEY ROAD, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,
TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (DE NGUYEN, THE
DESIGN GROUP, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; MR. & MRS. COSTAGLIO, PROPERTY
OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER
No ex parte communications were reported and all Commissioners had visited the property.
Reference staff report dated July 22, 2013, with attachments. Community Development Director
Meeker briefly presented the project description.
Questions of staff:
None.
Vice -Chair Davis opened the public comment period.
De Nguyen represented the applicant:
Are attempting to redefine the home as Craftsman -style.
Are keeping the existing one-story wall at the front that is at a substandard setback in
order to provide a greater setback at the rear.
The two story element will be pushed back on the lot to provide less mass on the
structure.
Commission comments:
• Expressed concern regarding the retention of the existing front wall; what will happen if
the wall ends up being removed during construction? (Meeker — noted that if the wall is
removed, then the project must be returned to the Planning Commission for
reconsideration. A notation has been provided on the plans to this effect; a similar
condition would be included in proposed conditions of approval.)
■ Remembers a similar situation elsewhere in the City; should the project have returned to
the Commission? (Meeker — yes, though if staff wasn't made aware of the situation if
could be missed.)
• Doesn't look like the existing wall will last long — he was able to push his pen through the
wall when visiting the site. (Nguyen — will reinforce the existing wall and footings if
needed during the construction so that it can remain as it is.)
• The existing wall will be stripped down to studs during the construction — it could be rotted
and require removal.
Why is the setback being measured to the existing bay window? (Hurin — the setback is
measured to the existing wall that is proposed to remain.)
Why is a two car garage being provided? Seems like it is eating into the yard area.
(Nguyen — client requested it.)
• The applicant needs to understand that there will likely be a condition of approval to
require the project to be revisited if the existing wall is removed. It would likely be easier
to begin with a clean slate. (Meeker — if the wall is removed, then the applicant would
need to request a variance. It is unclear whether or not findings for a variance for a new
wall could be met, so the project may need to be revised to comply with the setback.)
• Asked if a bay window that doesn't extend to the ground would still be counted in the
setback? (Hurin — yes.)
Noted that the roof structure over the bay window is to be revised from a flat roof to a
gabled roof.
EXCERPT —July 22, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes
122 Stanley Road (Agenda Item 3)
Page A.1 — shows hip roof on site plan, but it is a gable on the elevation.
• In general, the massing is being handled well.
■ May wish to spend more time on the detailing, particularly around the windows.
• Feels like there is not a consistent proportion with the window pattern.
Expressed concern regarding the six by six column elements on the front porch — could be
spaced too closely and may be difficult to maintain — a more substantial column may be
better. Look at details that are more typical of the Craftsman style.
• Noted that there are some awkward interior elements — should consult an interior
designer, as there could be some floor plan changes that may change the massing of the
structure.
• Clarify the dimensions of the design elements on the exterior — thickness as well as width.
• Referenced other examples of material massing that could be helpful.
• A.2 — the master bedroom window will look down onto a roof — look at detailing in this
area.
• On page A.5 it appears that the roof adjacent to the balcony on the rear is not
proportioned correctly.
• Window notation — specify that will be wood windows with aluminum cladding will be used
on both the home and garage — be consistent.
• Noted the direct vent fireplace — would like to see the vent for the fireplace run all the way
up rather than out the side of the house.
• Regarding storm water runoff notation — planning to save rainwater? (Nguyen — will
consider.)
• Noted that the floor drains in the garage cannot be drained to the sanitary sewer.
• Noted other possible errors in the storm water checklist.
• Noted concerns expressed by neighbors. (Nguyen — has met with neighbors and they are
ok with plans now.)
Public comments:
Dennis Wong, 121 Channing Road; spoke:
The second floor deck appears to be looking directly into his rear yard — will impact his
privacy.
The plans show the Plum tree being retained — is this correct? (Nguyen — correct. Meeker
— suggested that applicant meet with Wong to address his concerns.)
Additional Commission comments:
Main concern is with front wall.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Gaul made a motion to place the item on the Regular Calendar when complete.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie.
Discussion of motion:
None.
EXCERPT — July 22, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes
122 Stanley Road (Agenda Item 3)
Vice -Chair Davis called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Regular Action Calendar
when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-3-0
(Commissioners DeMartini, Sargent and Terrones absent). The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8.20 p.m.
e
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
10Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: 82 — 210
❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Other:
PROJECT ADDRESS: I Z2 S I PAN j /ZIP
APPLICANT project contact person ❑
Payor of DSR deposit/handling fee ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name: 1 D G— 1 I Dr-SI C--t-J 0 T2LJU1'
Address: 7-all; E . 7 tfi4f) 1AWIF # 300
City/State/Zip: Sol'k j M /t Inc) ; CA v /
Phone: (CS-0
Fax:
PROPERTY OWNER project contact person
Payer of DSR deposit/handling fee ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name: Mt.. s' Mt,,. CAS i ACC L10
Address: z;O l C� F /MF2E/Z Gi
City/State/Zip: HI LC&olZou(4�y , C7}
Phone: 1978
Fax:
E-mail: DE' CO, TO4 A(2� . CoM E-mail:
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact personPl
Payer of DSR deposit/handling fee ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name: T Q 'T H-F -FEi ati G7f2oUF_7V'�
Address:
City/State/Zip: _ '—�= AS. AbOVC
Phone:
Fax:
E-mail:
* Burlingame Business License #: ZP)3 sj 5
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �is4jo2 2�f�tUPtZ 4 �FC�Ni� CTyrzS iii�nl�o/�
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I here y certify under p "of p jury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
Applicant's signature: Date: 4 /j 2' 12D
I am aware of the proposed application and hereby author) bove applicant to submit this application to the Planning
Commission. � 2
Property owner's signature: '`ry`y r ' l d 4;i v Date:_ y
Date submitted: 4' (5' 1
* Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. s:IHANoouTSWCAPP/Icotlon.doc
llwjad leha S
ds
ulllemcj Ilwed al ulS
ads
MON
N
ullslx3
d
Malna�j u lsa4
2JS4
a olanu3;y 10H ululloaa
3Ha
Twiad asfl leuolimuoo
dflo
weal
uoileinajggy
:AoN
ola()j
i7J � y�naJoGS��_`H
�� �aaawwb� 05
:Aq pied
ea; 6uilpuey/4isodep asa
Va
p - V W (�.O; � b/` U �.t .Jl /' t� �, l9 �vl I v�� �I'.1 1 b n n(L�S p .^c» �
1 \ l � ` l 1 1
Ma „vard .,y, �� fa, uoL�V �,�adv
:uoijduosaa }oafoad
.Q
Aiup asn mess
aao jol aaeds siul
June 3, 2013
City of Burlingame
Planning Commission
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: 122 Stanley Road
Dear Planning Commissioners,
.JUL - ? 2013
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DIY.
Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. We recently learned that a new house will be
constructed at 122 Stanley Road. We are pleased with the proposed improvements and
welcome our new neighbors to the block.
We do expect some disruption during construction. However, there are several families with
young children on this block. Therefore, we sincerely request that the contractor implement the
following mitigations during construction and ask that they be included as conditions of approval
for the project:
■ Start construction no earlier than 8 a.m. on weekdays; and
■ Install construction fencing with a screen or fabric along the perimeter of the property to
contain dust and debris and also keep children from entering the construction site.
Below you will find signatures of several neighbors within the vicinity of the proposed project
who request that the above be implemented during construction.
1,5
+}+' ,«-r IAf_ ;p, r ✓R."a�. - 'tea
.✓ .I1 p■]{ I r.-
•
f•1, w • wT— X,
77
I. J.
Date:
To:
From:
Project Comments
April 15, 2013
X Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning Staff
0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition
(major renovation) and new detached garage at 122 Stanley Road,
zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-210
Staff Review: April 22, 2013
1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the
City storm drain system.
2. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway and other necessary
appurtenant work.
3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 4/26/2013
Date
To:
From
Project Comments
Revised Plans Submitted June 17, 2013
0 Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning Staff
0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition
(major renovation) to an existing single family dwelling and a new
detached garage at 122 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-
210
Staff Review: N/A
No further comments.
All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 4-18-2013 will apply to this
project.
Reviewed
Project Comments
Date: April 15, 2013
To: 0 Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
From: Planning Staff
0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition
(major renovation) and new detached garage at 122 Stanley Road,
zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-210
Staff Review: April 22, 2013
1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010
California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California
Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in
Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00
p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the
provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in
Ordinance 1813.
On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full scale.
(�V Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency
Standards.
Go to htto://www.enerov.ca.gov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and details.
4) Place the following information on the first page of the plans:
"Construction Hours"
Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
(See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.)
On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to
be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further
City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project
designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically
illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work.
6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business
license.
7) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all
structures on the property, existing driveways, and on -site parking.
9) Provide existing and proposed elevations.
10) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame
Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed
fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined
by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the
requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2010 California
Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020
Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and
approved by, the Building Division prior to the implementation of any work not specifically shown
on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval,
necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot
be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans.
11) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will
be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued
after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new
Certificate of Occupancy has been issued.
12) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new
walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit
will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of any building
components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner
is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed.
13) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed
Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued
until a Building Permit is issued for the project.
14) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines
15) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures.
16) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. (PW E
tter dated 8-17-88)
ndicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls at the garage that are less than five feet from the
property line will be built of one -hour fire -rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table 602)
Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that
complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the net clear opening height
and width of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings.
J�TQIndicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of
Public Works.
20) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are
considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details
if your project entails landings more than 30" in height.
21) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
22 rovide lighting at all exterior landings.
5,1the fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building
within ten feet. 2010 CBC §2113.9
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 2,
3, 5, 17, 18, 19, and 23 must be re -sub 'tt ed before this project can move forward for Planning
Commission action.
Reviewed by:,
Date:
To:
From:
Project Comments
Revised Plans Submitted June 17, 2013
0 Engineering Division
(650) 5W7230
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning Staff
0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 556-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition
(major renovation) to an existing single family dwelling and a new
detached garage at 122 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-
210
Staff Review: N/A
1. Landscape plan is required to meet'Water Conservation in Landscape
Regulations" (attached). Irrigation Plan required for Building permit. Audit due
for Final.
Project Comments
Date: April 15, 2013
To: 0 Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
From: Planning Staff
0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition
(major renovation) and new detached garage at 122 Stanley Road,
zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-210
Staff Review: April 22, 2013
1. No existing tree over 48 inches in circumference at 54 inches from base of
tree may be removed without a Protected Tree Permit from the Parks Division
(558-7330).
11 2. Three (3) new or existing landscape trees will be required for final. New trees
!� must be 24" box size or larger.
P. Protect City Street Tree during all phases of construction.
Reviewed by: B Disco
Date: 4/25/13
Date:
To:
From:
Project Comments
April 15, 2013
0 Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning Staff
® Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition
(major renovation) and new detached garage at 122 Stanley Road,
zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-210
Staff Review: April 22, 2013
Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence.
1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter.
2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly —
Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building
Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split
between domestic and fire protection lines.
3. All sprinkler drainage shall be placed into landscaping areas.
4. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall
clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings
shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
Reviewed by:�
Date: '�I 6_ f 3
Date:
To:
From
Project Comments
Revised Plans Submitted June 17, 2013
0
Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0
Building Division
(650) 558-7260
0
Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning Staff
0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
X Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition
(major renovation) to an existing single family dwelling and a new
detached garage at 122 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-
210
Staff Review: N/A
1) The Stormwater Requirements Checklist has been filled out and returned. It
indicates that the project does not trigger the new stormwater requirements.
2) Comments included in earlier review should be incorporated during building permit
issuance.
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727
Reviewed by: SD
Date: 6/28/13
Project Comments
Date: April 15, 2013
To: 0
Engineering Division
0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7230
(650) 558-7600
0
Building Division
X Stormwater Division
(650) 558-7260
(650) 342-3727
0
Parks Division
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7334
(650) 558-7204
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review for a first and second story addition
(major renovation) and new detached garage at 122 Stanley Road,
zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-210
Staff Review: April 22, 2013
1 Stormwater requirements are required to be implemented at stand-alone single
amily home projects that create and/or replace 2,500 sq.ft. or more of impervious
surface. These requirements are in addition to any City requirements. To determine if
this project is subject to those requirements complete and return the attached
"Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects." For additional information about these
requirements please refer to the attached flyer "New Stormwater Control
Requirements Effective 12/1112" and by visiting the San Mateo County Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Program (SMCWPPP) website at:
hftp://flowstobay.org/bs_new—development.php#flyers
2) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's
NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction
activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and
effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When
submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project
notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project
proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this
requirement. Electronic file is available for download at:
http://www.flowstobay. org/documents/business/construction/Cou ntywide_Prog ram_B
MP_Plan_Sheet_J un2012.pdf
3) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using
architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer
"Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at:
http://www.flowstobay. org/docu ments/m u n icipalities/nd/Materia Is/2012%20 Materials/
Arch itectural_copper_BMPs_FI NAL. pdf
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727
Reviewed by: SD 5b Date: 4/18/2013
SAN MATEO COUNTYWIDE
`YaterPolltnbn
Prevention Ptogmm
Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects
Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP)
Order No. R2-2009-0074 ; Order No. R2-2011-0083
NPDES No. CAS612008
RECEIVED
City of Burlingame - Office of NOV _ 1 2013
Environmental Compliance
1103 Airport Blvd
CIT`f OF BURLINGAME
Office: (650) 342.3727 COD -PLANNING DIY.
Fax: (650) 342.3712
Complete this Pofm for individual single family home projects of any size, otherprojects that create andror replace less than 10,000
square feet of impervious surface, and projects in the following categories that create and/or replace less than 5,000 square feet of
impervious surface: restaurants, retail gasoline outlets, auto service facilities', and parking lots (stand-alone or part of another
use).
A. Project Information
A.1 Project Name: 111 STANJI`'1 SD
A.2 Project Address:
A.3 Project APN: rs 2 9 - 2 /P� 2 - 9 Cp
B. Select Appropriate Site Design Measures —/
B.1 Does the project create and/or replace 2,500 square feet or more of Impervious surfacez? ❑ Yes t{eT No
D If yes, and the project will receive final discretionary approval on or after December 1, 2012, the project must include one
of Site Design Measures a through f3 Fact sheets regarding site design measures a through f may be downloaded at
httpJ/www.flawstobay.org/bs new developmentphp#ftyers..
D If no, or the project will receive final discretionary approval before December 1, 2012, the project is encouraged to
implement site design measures , which may be required at municipality discretion. Consult with municipal staff about
requirements for yourproject.
B.2 Is the site design measure included in the project plane?
Yes
No
Plan
Sheet No.
❑
a.
Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels and use rainwater for irrigation or
other non -potable use. -
❑
b.
Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas.
[{�
❑
c.
Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas.
❑
d.
Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas.
[J�
❑
e.
Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces.
❑
f.
Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable
surfaces.
a../
LvJ
❑
g.
Minimize land disturbance and impervious surface (especially parking lots).
❑
h.
Maximize permeability by clustering development and preserving open space.
❑
I.
Use micro -detention, including distributed landscape -based detention.
❑
J.
Protect sensitive areas, including wetland and riparian areas, and minimize
changes to the natural topography.
❑
d
k.
Self -treating area (see Section 4.2 of the C.3 Technical Guidance)
❑
00/
I.
Self -retaining area (see Section 4.3 of the C.3 Technical Guidance)
❑
m. Plant or preserve interceptor trees (Section 4.1, C.3 Technical Guidance)
t See Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes here
z Complete the C.3/CS Development Review Checklist if the project is not an Individual single family home, and D creates and/or replaces
10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface; or if R is a restaurant, retail gasoline outlet, auto service facility, or parking lot project that
creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of Impervious surface.
3 See MRP Provision C.3.1.
4 See MRP Provision C.3.a.1.(8).
Approved December4, 2012
Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects
C. Select appropriate source controls (Encouraged for all projects; maybe required at municipal discretion. Consult municipal staff.$)
Are these
features In
Features that
require source
-
Source control measures
Is source control
measure Included
project?
control
(Refer to Local Source Control List for detailed requirements)
in project plans?
measures
Yes No
Plan
Yes No Sheet No.
9
❑
Storm Drain
• Mark on -site inlets with the words "No Dumping! Flows to Bay" or equivalent.
❑
091
❑
Floor Drains
• Plumb interior floor drains to sanitary sewer [or prohibit].
❑
Parking garage
• Plumb interior parking garage floor drains to sanitary sewers
El
El
Landscaping
• Retain existing vegetation as practicable.
❑
• Select diverse species appropriate to the site. Include plants that are pest -
and/or disease -resistant, drought -tolerant, and/or attract beneficial insects.
1P11Equipment
• Minimize use of. pesticides and quick -release fertilizers.
• Use efficient irrigation system; design to minimize runoff.
ooVSpa/Fountain
• Provide connection to the sanitary sewer to facilitate draining s
ElElFood
Service
Provide sink or other area for equipment cleaning, which is:
❑
El
• Connected to a grease interceptor prior to sanitary sewer discharge.
(non-
• Large enough for the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned.
-
residential)
• Indoors or in an outdoor roofed area designed to prevent stormwater run-on
and run-off, and signed to require equipment washing in this area.
❑
Refuse Areas
• Provide a roofed and enclosed area for dumpsters, recycling containers, etc.,
❑
❑
_
designed to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff.
• Connect any drains in or beneath dumpsters, compactors and tallow bin
areas serving food service facilities to the sanitary sewer.
El
Outdoor Process
• Perform process activities either indoors or in roofed outdoor area, designed
❑
❑
Activities 7
to revert stormwater run-on and runoff, and to drain to the sanita sewers
❑
Outdoor
+ Cover the area or design to avoid pollutant contact with stormwater runoff.
❑
❑
Equipment/
Locate area only on paved and contained areas.
Materials
Roof storage areas that will contain non -hazardous liquids, drain to sanitary
will
Storage
sewers and contain b or similar.
❑
Vehicle/
Roofed, pave and berm wash area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff,
❑
❑
Equipment
plumb to the sanitary sewers, and sign as a designated wash area.
Cleaning
Commercial car wash facilities shall discharge to the sanitary sewers
❑
Vehicle/
Designate repair/maintenance area indoors, or an outdoors area designed to
❑
❑
Equipment
prevent stormwater run-on and runoff and provide secondary containment. Do
Repair and
not install drains in the secondary containment areas.
Maintenance
• No floor drains unless pretreated prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. s
• Conned containers or sinks used for parts cleaning to the sanitary sewer. s
❑
Fuel
• Fueling areas shall have impermeable surface that is a) minimally graded to
❑
❑
Dispensing
prevent ponding and b) separated from the rest of the site by a grade break.
Areas
• Canopy shall extend at least 10 ft in each direction from each pump and drain
away from fueling area.
❑
Loading Docks
• Cover and/or grade to minimize run-on to and runoff from the loading area.
❑
❑
• Position downspouts to direct stormwater away from the loading area.
• Drain water from loading dock areas to the sanitary sewers
• Install door skirts between the trailers and the building.
ET
❑
Fire Sprinklers
• Design for discharge of fine —sprinkler test water to landscape or sanitary sewers
❑
Rr
❑
Miscellaneous
• Drain condensate of air conditioning units to landscaping. Large air
❑
❑
Drain or Wash
conditioning units may connect to the sanitary sewers
Water
• Roof drains shall drain to unpaved area where practicable.
• Drain boiler drain lines, roof top equipment, all washwater to sanitary sewers.
-
❑
Architectural
• Drain rinse water to landscaping, discharge to sanitary sewers, or collect and
❑
❑
Copper
. dispose propedy offsite. See flyer "Requirements for Architectural Copper."
5 See MRP Provision C.3.0(7).
2
Approved December4, 2012
Stormwater Checklist for Small Projects
D. Implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Required thrall projects.)
DA Is the site a "High Priority Site"? (Municipal staff will make this determination; if the answer is yes, � Yes ❑ No
the project will be referred to construction site inspection staff for monthly stormwater inspections
during the wet season, October f through April 30.)
• 'High Priority Sites" are sites that require a grading permit, are adjacent to a creek, or are
otherwise high priority for stormwater protection during construction per MRP Provision C.6.e.1(2).
D.2 All projects require appropriate stormwater BMPs during construction, indicate which BMPs are included in the project, below.
Yes No Best Management Practice BMP
❑ Attach the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's construction BMP plan sheet to
project plans and require contractor to implement the applicable BMPs on the plan sheet.
❑ Temporary erosion controls to stabilize all denuded areas unlit permanent erosion controls are established.
[vf ❑ Delineate with field markers clearing limits, easements, setbacks, sensitive or critical areas, buffer zones,
trees and drainage courses.
❑ Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following:
• Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls, include Inspection frequency;
• Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of
excavated or cleared material;
• Specifications for vegetative cover 6 mulch, include methods and schedules for planting and fertilization;
• Provisions for temporary and/or permanent irrigation.
❑ Perform clearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather.
❑ Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewaterinh and obtain all necessary Denita.
ig ❑ Protect all storm drain inlets in vicinity of site using sediment controls such as berms, fiber rolls, or filters.
❑ Trap sediment on -site, using BMPs such as sediment basins or traps, earthen dikes or banns, silt fences,
check dams, soil blankets or mats, covers for soil stock piles, etc. _
Rf ❑ Divert on -site runoff around exposed areas; divert off -site runoff around the site (e.g., swales and dikes).
❑ Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction Impacts using vegetative buffer strips,
❑ No cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on -site, except in a designated area where washwater is
❑ Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials/wastes property to prevent contact with stormwater.
❑ Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees/subcontractors re: construction BMPs.
❑ Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints,
concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, washwater or sediments, rinse water from architectural copper, and
non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses.
Name of applicant completing the
Date: Iy/zs/ 13
E. Comments (for municipal staff use only):
F. NOTES (for municipal staff use only):
Section A Notes:
Section B Notes:
6 Any connection to the sanitary sewer system Is subject to sanitary district approval.
Businesses that may have outdoor process activities/aquipment include machine shops, auto repair, industries with pretreatment facilities.
3
Approved December 4, 2012
SAw-kAT Ea COUNTYWIDE
ion.
7Pr.; f g pram
Clean Water. Ndaahy Community.
T
Construction projects are requiredto i-Wlarctent the stortnw.ater best management practices (BMP) on this page,
as tttey•app}y to youf project;,all yearlong.
Materials & waste Management
Nun-Narmwous blartrina
O BCrmand<o•tralOclprlcs of and tlifl[r UlFtrcM[WClrm rmlcrkl
144krpsnm'Rn min is rnrtcmt Prifnol mlirch bcins mW'xiein
1[Jvyt.
O UU, fbul JoliI mower r Iaimedwmm to, Jon wwvl.
IiavaLlua NoteAmr
-0 Lebel'-14bmWo W amvruls aw hamnlom xaer tsath or
pvikWe:.pmnv, Ihimm�. rah UoW. rrsl. oik and wife-¢l la
veU`U`U pdW'tin'. mrmq'. skk em1 r[J'rel rtjWntms
Q SINeIm!araarpankr "a Bed nylti in yv¢r Ug111 eonNopr[. [brt
IU'dpplppame s-m'amn' eoru inm(nt eW wm> Wem L IM1c-W Of
mGvmmll: dny during Ntl Ne
xlun
NMrwnakn min ri forccmt
"-O FaO" rlrtrvepplkallan Wlrmalbrs forhecWom
. mFk�WR�a b-racf[l ubno umnbr[ Ines a -snap. p-ew
vpph'oaldwrs
....'P rek is fatten xiWin3U Moo,
❑ Armrot apPrUPdm[ tlispaml-fall Munkm matlat.
'Wab Mampemret
O C.rt[nmu du,aUll wnmiw,, _,,h. with outs m the mJ or
- nary xmrt dmew dadngnv nmllrcr
yO Ch' %wo duWml co.winm rUm Umly For o,U on, W mokv
art IhcS dr[ ad[•crf tcd Nctr M1om Jvnn a Jump-W m rFc
cwuuwdw alk.
'!Q Ckm ar mplxt pprmme ledma ena inapell Ihcm frtmrrnth for
kebvd rphh..
. O D'upnc Pfall nvI-wJ Jchrb pmWdm. Rmxk makriplr PW
umoriolc cm bOV b.o laWnm mpke. [on trek. vggrtsak bmc
nrakrk4 xmod 09 bwW. piPc..k.l
v❑ Dixoto orliq.U.dun nom punu. eiamn, aP,m, glm, aw
dmniny WIN v 1—dom xvk
{CumtrunWn lmrnntts nnJ Pcrimcrn
""main Emr::...IRmlr'e.IUdee¢rconWu and smbibtt all
wvwnion ngvent-and trio to auftriwlry mnwl nmioa ono
rnfi. tlimlmne. tbnranae.aw m.d R,U.
Q SwveP m mmuum.ny rlrnl Imetlns immcaiald,.W mare
mtlimtal rUnmePrnenl I'urlFcr ImcAlnp,NanFuu tlwrn nrta
to elan rm Irne41a.
Equipment Management &-
Splll Control
Matto amtood Punkin,
❑ Bo'yose-rmartgfinoa.Nilh epprgPdak BMPLfor
- ahickmdquipmw,Pi i'W'rryh,
❑ P-Rmme jamain. ampakjn U,.UU'lucI,
and [9mpmwtmtynsaRxik.
❑ ar<ruel"u8or .earal neioWmwemmeone
woilL wr4wo Wmw oma w.x�Bom stela tlmiW
uN alp a Aipp+ b --Nah 1. [pibW. o[r dd
Recyck xdupme ra[iasmlmmJPour...
❑ V redieb m rwrpmmnlmaug un ". Uemm
[Ir-vr Rilb'T'Qdy W v1-Wed ale WelmBml
dnUu. r nakrlemPIllb 8rrt-2 rlrtcu, slam
data,-ormrgxenmum
❑ Do ml tled•enmkm ognip. came urWemupL
mimmb &a.. s..:mine WOlpnmoo, .W.
SPRIPlmtmiunand Comml
❑ KmP Sptl tkmPpmmcrfah'(mv A".¢.p.l
.•ubblem WecpmWeumaik m oU unr-
Q'Iaspect;wkW oW.abmw afegvvll)' for w
rcpvv k+ia Pool ux drip parW Uuh U,o
eetirmwk, mcmmk.
O Ck .,Pah.olrmin imnmdolahmddIUP..f
❑ X)U.1 h. doou ourrmo Ua ro Bleb hnc'UJ
Vmdry [kanUP..lbws(abmW-m.a rick.
ulm. onarormaay
O Smup trys WeIeT ouuUieb wmedhkll. no ml
Yf to mmsbth,UmmT.0 x1tt o1 loo, Ihwt
O Ckm vp mllh wtlin env by JiMing op and
P PWdy d'upod, or ... Wmw D.
O lto"I,i"itant epilb immrdinWly. You ar .mquanj
bf W.b rtWneu elg(d8cmf Wkmsu olh®udbm
--Wank uulvltesoii Th mwrtn milE Ilnid911
ur%I=r-r mmagemyltcpomrmumlol, tlnUo to
n.n.,18 1M-Offix PfBm24 cjlqhotr Sen is-WeMnB
Crn¢r, Itlpl NR.]551)133 M1ounl.
Storm drain
Earthwork& Paving/AsphaltWork
Contagiinated
Soils
HmaYe9talml
Q&Uw wmingead.1 letting in ns,
Q seLnauk Smdfve and epamavon xnll fur
colt.. m ubanmk'v lemon WFUU,
dV nwnmaMv. -
free pmemkm, out WU dmg m doe.
Q Slabala all dtrui Aa^_, malallffi
nuaAdkl0pirdrj'evemot
0Covaabrmd-UrWhUandmaMel-
hula noo
Gbv
aiUUUPpfSina PUUw Ll —Ldr,
Bust rti cc
UUK"rb.opo'boiaewboluu
Seoagwlt sneralmgbr onomvd
6 $pWixpleei lcaeudm krerniw
'mowl
ood
O Cvtolawv nuk ornWmprutcb
tlimme Ulem3iabvym lt!md or row,
collnnklknh
Wmrml-dwarpoUneea.
❑DDou
roN...mm<.. meaomn eolm-e.
Sedimml Cunkvl
O PWMrmm.eWv Nktr, smWn.Nv51m
and Qmiengemmi![-Nilb vpPlpplvk
b�ms.rY pynel bass tbu mllL
O Pnmw mdimpnr fmmmialmivgvadk
to Wkllfo,6[vtl mtivhuiyadimenl
[mbuly mth ul Rbn m114 sill lmmL w
meimanlm,�,.
O Kpyncemmr mil Po ale em n'hoo it
wawlwL4m iPW We [veer
❑ MU ce-k mvu a to El.
C.Utu og lhesik, ml in lLe tllxL
❑ ComvmWvd 8o16
Q Ifaiw Ptec fPlWmringwwialmserc
ob0ied lust Wrtov�imdpnevd
welvpt to Reyoml nbur OIm4q.
GNml9mrd:
•Vnlmmlmlltgwhl.ro.Aircolondoe.
orodm.
•AbewPlpd mdmemuvd W &P
• AOoas o ad rots
atBumd bvritly &bm, or 1I .
-pmllwxuawm�mmL
Sawmwn[ & wsp hnbfrooirell Remornl
O Compl-loto nor bnioule alorm
dmih bJctrxffi mwwll¢s. Uq fJkr
fvbriawWh moon ivklnLrmmymtl
bop W lmep xleiry'vurorWe nom drvk
Slm'eT abomh. wmenwu snrcul
amI �W tlbplm ofgll name m moU
arcoochr nPm kwemmm
ae ew ofw8 mm.k dq' (Nakn-n is
movvl).
Q V mpcbl shmT man d mkn busin clan
atop immedu¢h'.
be liable for fines of up to $
Concrete, Grout& Mortar
ma ortpvll[naMsnny from Rita',
m. Them marmn man m•er rurJl o
atom drain.
Well. eLdc.a te11ipmmrplmc$
oRpbo' vmmeiaM arw to tl¢n:
b oo dixIne W o the UaUUrI, ng it
i1a m ono -di., emn. lei mwnlc
maw duNm.,fro. egc.
❑ UIPUUUlhe UwM1 mokr rmm rd'or
lbWSW PrwtU mew rrtle eM tuner- it
r nYVrPptkk uk W ml nrttik.
Dewatering .
r� f
OFn limb lnmem dlivnon all
lmrvnMlun Ih[ w s and dl n ran W I
--`Ur es 1 - silo room
dhse
mkrfrnmemaemhyrmmallwocc. tl
w1as tf ePUmUse-anusani awmc.
Q W bus aewu. �ho mlil W oblvin
pprmhl rmm tie IPa1 mvniciNliry
bok.
Waughdaud6vmryrydi rusWtmorlr mbtlvimcmmCu
p
er
manumduin FIlrtmonordioman
mybmqm
O Warusu Pillow-commimtion,,,"r
b ltqulnd prior totwee or W.
Enui'ca.
tmrru. er, Con lam, WewilUda ro
b.l 0 n xamlkl Ul,. c h ,niuUN mA
now dImerynt ttulb.COnbmllbkd
po llo 61er mlln be,oaIW or Iraukd
onalu kr poper mepmal.
Painting & Paint Removal
ka
y I
Palm ngcl-
O Nmur-Iran blush-.1 nom point
one rl-o mlo -an-n, pa,, mvmr
Jmm.-sun—xvun.
�Ibn..l.rl -d wmis, IUU.m bmsFcs
IO We c[knr ponrbk Rim[ IO We
mule srnn amk Ira. hel.IinW
ym-1.10. GPmW 1.1 wmenokr
---anus mWodp. Non to Nim
❑ For wan. mu rot bm[Mtm
W<-kn1 Ncnbk aw Ilea-nilb N—r
mJ-.l mz e m mrwnWeer Fru,r Una
Wrw m-- M l'—U turn?a
1-0-aM unumble Winnn/mlrmuas
Lumrtnmr.1vlc
Puinl mmvl
O Cam•"cvl peal n61pint, tdu-aod
rArPvmd dun from maim Pemuer
wmuwnm mna lwtl Pr Inbunum on
bt ai-PPsm -r m nmam,n mm,m.
❑ P-im cbiw PM dust from nmlJuzvdmn
dnCtlnPA.9-dswdblUI,o rbe
su Pl Up or mlrttlN io pWlk dmp
.WhsaddaPncd.resami.
Landscape Materials
ON
O CvnuW nocklited boom -pins makrah
bl .bons than -,,, WIP, u'nrn Wry ort
rot-tiloly Win, uUoL
O Slmk npdibk low.,X motor, un
Palkb. C-m rpbm Jam mm-awls
ram Iner not anirtly being I l or
.PpIIW ' me
O DUCOmlmc vpplicnuun or. cmalb e
ImdbPPe malcnnl 1%%in t dust M., n
r 1—min n-nlndurtno..I nwWrr.
SAN HATE I EOOhIMIDE
Water4lution
Prevention Program Requirements for Architectural Copper
Own W.W. Hums C.., hy.
Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing!
Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life
Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes
into contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts,
especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination
solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown
typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to
remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants.
Municipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the
installation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper.
Use Best Management Practices (BMPs)
The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be implemented to prevent prohibited
discharges to storm drains.
gutter and drainpipe.
During Installation
• If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory.
• If patination is done on -site, implement one or more of the following BMPs:
o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the
rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain.
Block off storm drain inlet if needed.
o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary
sewer. Contact your local sanitary sewer agency before
discharging to the sanitary sewer.
o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off -site for
proper disposal.
Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious
coating that prevents further corrosion and runoff. This will
also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring
less maintenance.
prohibited discharge. The water must be
pumped and disposed of properly.
During Maintenance
Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof,
re-patination or re -application of impervious coating:
• Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains.
• Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local
sanitary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off -site for proper disposal.
Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself!
If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non-
stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing
copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal
stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine.
Contact Information
The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at
www.flowstobay.org (click on 'Business", then "New Development', then 'local permitting agency").
FINAL February 29, 2012
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 122 Stanley
Road, zoned R-1, 50 Kammerer Ct, Hillsborough, CA 94010, Property owners, APN: 029-282-
210
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
November 12, 2013, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other
written materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is
no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on
the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, 15303 (a), which
states that construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures
including one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone is
exempt from environmental review. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family
residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption.
2. Said Design Review is approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review are set forth in the staff report,
minutes, and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12'" day of November. 2013 by the
following vote:
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review.
122 Stanley Road
Effective November 22, 2013
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division
date stamped November 1, 2013, sheets T1 through GN, Landscape Site Plan,
Landscape Plan and Boundary and Topographic Survey;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features,
roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to
Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined
by Planning staff);
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this
permit;
4. that the conditions of the City Engineer's April 26, 2013 memo, the Chief Building
Official's June 21, 2013 and April 18, 2013, memos, the Parks Supervisor's June 17,
2013 and April 25, 2013 memos, the Fire Marshal's April 30, 2013 memo, and the
Stormwater Coordinator's June 28, 2013 and April 18, 2013 memos shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project
shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community
Development Director;
6. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall
be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project
construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of
approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall
remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process.
Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall
not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City
Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and
that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects
to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
10. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the
new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as
identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site
sedimentation of storm water runoff;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Design Review.
122 Stanley Road
Effective November 22, 2013
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification
by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design
professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved
floor area ratio for the property;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential
designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an
architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design
which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as
shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing
compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the
final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division;
and
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
a
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA94010
PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790
www.burlingame.org
Site: 122 STANLEY ROAD
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the
following public hearing on WESDAY, NOVEMBER 12,
2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, (A:
Application for Design Review for a new, two-story single
family dwelling and detached garage at 122 STANLEY
ROAD zoned R-l. APN 029-282-210
Mailed: November 1, 2013
(Please refer to other side)
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
City of Burlingame
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
(Please refer to other side)