Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout118 Stanley Road - Staff ReportCITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes October 14, 2008 3. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department August 14, 2008; 4. that the conditions oft' Chief Building Offtal's k t 15, 200 emo, to NPDES Coordinator's August 18, 2008 me and and the Cityy, erugu2, 200memo shall be met; 5. that if theeccessory ucture is demo 'heq#r the envel6pe chan ed at a later date the Conditional Use Permit and Sp cial Permits as ell as any otherxceptior to the code granted here will become void; .fie 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the Iegulati ps of th Bay Area Air Quality Manag ment District; 7. /hat prior t ,issuan of a bwlydIn�enhit for.constr ction of the project, th ' projecCponstru Ion plans shall a mo ied:to include a cover sheet li ng all conditions of , p oval AbOtgd the Planning Co on, � r City Council on appeal; ich shall remain a paa'of all sets of ap ved plans througho a co hstruction process. Com lance with all conditionipf approval is re .aired; the conditions of approval shall not be modifie or charjged without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; s� 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall complywith the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial orfull demolition of a structure, interior orexterior, shall require a demolition permit; and 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by Commissioner A uran. Discussion of motion: None Chair Cauchi called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:27 p.m. Commissioner We noted that she would recuse herself from participating regarding Item 5, she lives within 500-feet of the property. She left the Council Chambers. City of Burlingame Item No. Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits Regular Action Address: 118 Stanley Road Meeting Date: October 14, 2008 Request: Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure that will be erected closer than 4' to any other structure on the same lot and Special Permits for an accessory structure that is greater than 28' in length and that is exempt from setback requirements and is located within the rear 40% of the lot. Applicant and Property Owners: Daniel and Susan Schoenthaler APN: 029-282-200 Designer: JD & Associates Lot Area: 5,750 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines - Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Class 3 (e), Accessory (appurtenant) structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Project Description: The site currently contains a single -story, three -bedroom house and a detached one -car garage. There is no work proposed on the house as part of this project. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing 261 SF detached one -car garage and to build a new382.5 SF detached one -car garage in its place. Because the proposed detached garage is located within the rear 40% of the lot and exempt from setback requirements, and because the proposed garage is greater than twenty-eight (28) feet in length, two Special Permits are required. A Conditional Use Permit is also required because the proposed detached garage will be erected closer than four (4) feet to another structure on the same property. With the removal of the existing detached garage and the addition of the proposed detached garage, the floor area will increase from 1,869 SF (0.33 FAR), to 1,990.5 SF (0.35 FAR), where 3,322.5 SF (0.58 FAR) is the maximum allowed (project is 1,332 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required forthe existing three (3) bedroom house. The existing detached garage will be removed and replaced with a new detached garage (10' x 20', clear interior measurements) which will provide one (1) covered space, and one (1) uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: • Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure that will be erected closer than four (4) feet to any other structure on the same lot (1'-7" proposed, measured eave to eave) (CS 25.60.010 e); • Special Permit for an accessory structure that is in the rear of the lot and that is more than twenty-eight (28) feet in length (CS 25.28.035 e); and • Special Permit for a detached garage exempt from setback restrictions located within the rear forty (40) percent of the lot (CS 25.28.035 d). 118 Stanley Road Lot Area: 5,750 SF Plans date stamped: October 1, 2008 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED Front Setback to Garage: 67'-2" (rear 41.6%) 69'-0" (rear 40%)' Rear 30% Right Setback to Garage: 1'-4" 0'-8" 0'-0" (with survey) Rear Setback to Garage: 23'-8" 12'-0" 0'-0" (with survey) Garage Setback To Other Structures: 2'-0" (to chimney) I 3'-10" (to house) 1'-7" (eave to chimney)2 1'-10" (eave to eave) 4'-0" (measured eave to eave) Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits 118 Stanley Road EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED Lot Coverage: 1,957.1 SF 2,078.5 SF 2,300 SF 34% 36% 40% Floor Area Ratio: 1,869.1 SF 1,990.5 SF 3,322.5 SF 0.33 FAR 0.35 FAR 0.58 FAR # of bedrooms: I 3 no change - Parking: 1 covered 1covered 1 covered (10' x 20') (10' x 20') (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered i 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Garage Height. n/a 15'-0" max. at rear 15'-0" Special Permit fora detached garage exempt from setback restrictions located within the rearforty (40) percent of the lot (CS 25.28.035 d). 2 Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure that will be erected closer than four (4) feet to any other structure on the same lot (1'-7" proposed, measured eave to eave) (CS 25.60.010 e). 3 (0.32 x 5,750 SF) + 1100 SF + 382.5 SF = 3,322.5 SF (0.58 FAR) Staff Comments: Staff would note that conditions of approval #2 and #3 were added at the request of the Planning Commission. See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer and NPDES Coordinator. Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Study Meeting on September 22, 2008, the Commission had several comments and suggestions regarding the proposed accessory structure and voted to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when all information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Division (September 22, 2008 Planning Commission Minutes). On October 1, 2008, the designer submitted revised plans and a response letter to the Planning Division to address the Planning Commission's concerns. The response letter and revised plans show no changes to the proposed garage, but they do provide more information concerning the two doors, the water line to the sink and the proposed fence returns. Please refer to the copy of the September 22, 2008, Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission concerns. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020, a-c): (a) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; (b) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) The planning commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. -2- Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits 118 Stanley Road Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation forthe removal that is proposed is appropriate. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped October 1, 2008, sheets G-1, G-2 and Boundary and Topographic Survey and that any changes to footprint or floor area of the accessory structure shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the waste line to the accessory structure shall be no larger than two inches; 3. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department August 14, 2008; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's August 15, 2008 memo, the NPDES Coordinator's August 18, 2008 memo and the City Engineer's August 22, 2008, memo shall be met; 5. that if the accessory structure is demolished orthe envelope changed at a laterdate the Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading orearth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; -3- Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits 118 Stanley Road 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner C. Daniel Schoenthaler, property owner, 118 Stanley Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 JD and Associates, applicant, 875 Mahler Road Suite 200, Burlingame, CA 94010 Attachments:' Applicant's Response to Commission's comments Minutes from September 22, 2008 Study Meeting Application to the Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit and Special Permit Forms Applicant's Letter of Explanation Arborist Report from Mayne Tree Expert Company, date stamped August 14, 2008 Photographs of existing double-trunked redwood tree in rear yard Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 3, 2008 Aerial Photo -4- Jerry Deal JD & ASSOCIATES Residential Design & Engineering September 30, 2008 City of Burlingame Ms. Erica Stromeier Associate Planner 501 Primrose Rd. Burlingame, CA 94010 118 Stanley Rd. Planning Commission Response • Garage doors swing in due to existing grading and code threshold requirements 7-3/4" maximum stoop, out swing must be 1" max. • Waste line at proposed sink to be 2" max. • Two doors are a request by the owner due to in swing code requirements and tandem parking. • Owner has requested special permit and conditional use permit for a two car garage for specific reasons, to attain more secure off street parking. • The garage corners will have fence returns from neighbor and security. _late RECEIVED G% 1 0 1 Zoos CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. 875 Mahler Rd. Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 tele: 650-697-1370 fax:866-899-7591 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes September 22, 2008 VI. STUDY ITEMS 118 STANLEY ROAD, ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR A NEW DETACHED GARAGE (DANIEL AND SUSAN SCHOENTHALER, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Planning Manager Brooks presented a summary of the staff report, dated September 22, 2008. Commission comments: • Proposed doors should swing out from garage so they don't swing into the parking area. • Add a condition that the Waste line should be no larger than two inches. • Ask the applicant why are two doors are proposed. • Recommend that a condition of approval be added that the recommendations of the arborist's report shall be followed. • Can the special permits and conditional use permits be eliminated if the garage were reduced in length? • It appears that the side of the garage will act as a fence, clarify how the fence along that side will be configured. This item was set for the regularAction Calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:08 p.m. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD •BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: ❑ Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel* ❑ Conditional Use Permit ® Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: // 9 S-+vcc y/ Ro;a � /3✓.zc✓•rg.�Mc Cl gVvlo 0 Please indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person PROPERTY OWNER project contact person OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: Sc/-10 EA/Tl-/A LE7� L7f} /EL�r✓54�/ Name: Yet-toc-,.l n-/A Address: (/� 5'/�1^�cE�/ koA- Address: (/� S��v4 �1 it2oA'71-:) City/State/Zip: GA %rid/�' City/State/Zip: _ 8`' z�i^/9 ^'tt / C4 ei410/0 Phone: 650 -5_'1 - 9S3 Z Fax: 6So Sy 8 - lqq Phone: (L YO Sq 8 - 9 S 3Z Fax: 6 so s' 8 - / / q I E-mail: dk-lSulocs 774a l6_4� &_ �/a;aDo,Cc,tE-mail: 4�A�t15ct1oE.✓n{�c y4H G�'L ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person( OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: AJ , A55o5 Address: 8 vS i»,Ahl<Z Rom �> Ste: rE Zc,o City/State/Zip: cA 2yylZ> Phone: 6 Sp 69 -7- 13 7 RECEIVED Fax: ' 8Cz� - € c-1 - 7S`( AUG 14 2008 E-mail: oFFlc£ CITY Of BURLINGAME * Burlingame Business License #: PLANNING DEPT, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 'TEA2,•j!7 _DoW•J t%�-b 6F12A6E —n4Ar IS P4�1,y9 AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby best of my knowledge and belief Applicant's signature: I am aware of the proposed Commission. Property owner's under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the Date: /'/'i4✓ 9 2/<8 authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Date: /yRu32/<$q Date submitted: * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. S1HandoutslPC Application 2008-B.handout Project Description: ;I Key: This Space for CDD Staff Use Only I C, CC I Ss u " ") &&I - Abbreviation., T erm CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declining Height Envelope DSR Design Review E Existing N New SFD Single Farnily- �ellin SP Special Permit RECEIVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION — CITY OF BURLINGAME AUG 2 9 2008 Schoenthaller residence garage CITY OF BURLINGAMk 118 Stanley Rd PLANNING DEPT. Burlingame, CA 94010 Conditional use permit for distance between dwelling and adjoining accessory structure Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience The new garage is being constructed, with regard to the existing dwelling and Chimney, at the same distance apart. The new garage will be several feet back from the existing and therefore, there is actually a lessening of the area which needs a conditional use permit. 2 How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? The proposed use is a detached garage which serves as an accessory structure to a residence in the R-1 zone. This use is in accordance with the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 3 How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? • The proposed structure matches the character of the dwelling and sits in approximately the same location. The presence of a large double trunk Redwood tree precludes moving the garage back further. • The use (garage in an R-1 zone) is consistent with the neighborhood. Sr-k+c, J t �� ALTLe5 (be-4 Cis (I a 5rA�/fxy tZ AI Tvs2u�/q.Q•uE City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P (650) 558-7250 • F (650) 696-3790 • www.burlinoame.om 1:51-NED BURL,INGAM1IE CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION iE-q [URLINGAME 4 MANNING DEPT. The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Rev. 07.2007 SPECIAL.PERMrr.FRM City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P (650) 556-7250 • F (650) 696-3790 • www.budinoame.om 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. Rev. 072007 SPECLOL.PERMIT.FRM SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION — CITY OF BURLINGAME Schoenthaller Residence 118 Stanley Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Special permit for an accessory structure greater than 28 feet in length. New garage proposal is 34' long. Existing garage is 24' long RECEIVED AUG 1 4 2008 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood The location of the garage is at the end of a long driveway and is the dominant character in the neighborhood. The garage is a tandem/single car width due to the location of the existing dwelling and a large redwood tree. The adjoining neighbor to the south has been advised to all aspects of the new garage and is supportive. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood • The exterior finishes match that of the main dwelling. • The style is consistent with the main dwelling and the eclectic character of the neighborhood. • The roof pitch of the garage is steeper than the main dwelling to allow for attic storage. The dwelling does not have much storage as is typical of many homes in the area. 3 How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? • The design guidelines ask that an addition or accessory structure to an existing residence be true to the architecture of the neighborhood. The garage is compatible with the neighborhood style and will enhance the aesthetics of that neighborhood. 4 Explain how the removal of anv trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed fir the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate N • No trees are to be removed with this accessory structure. A large redwood tree dictates the location of the garage. SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION —CITY OF BURLINGAME RECEIVED Schoenthaller Residence AUG ? A 2008 118 Stanley Road (;ITY OF BURLINGAME Burlingame, CA 94010 MANNING DEPT. Special permit for encroachment of an accessory structure into the rear 40% of the lot. New garage proposal is 34' long. Existing garage is 24' long and currently extends beyond the rear 40% of the lot. A double car garage is not possible due to the location of the dwelling and a large redwood tree Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood The location of the garage is at the end of a long driveway and is the dominant character in the neighborhood. The garage is a tandem/single car width due to the location of the existing dwelling and a large redwood tree. The adjoining neighbor to the south has been advised to all aspects of the new garage and is supportive. 2 Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood • The exterior finishes match that of the main dwelling. • The style is consistent with the main dwelling and the eclectic character of the neighborhood. • The roof pitch of the garage is steeper than the main dwelling to allow for attic storage. The dwelling does not have much storage as is typical of many homes in the area. 3 How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? e. The design guidelines ask that an addition or accessory structure to an existing residence be true to the architecture of the neighborhood. The garage is compatible with the neighborhood style and will enhance the aesthetics of that neighborhood. 4 Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of anv new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the citp's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. N • No trees are to be removed with this accessory structure. A large redwood tree dictates the location of the garage. August 14, 2008 Planning Commission Community Development Department City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94040 RE: Special Permit Request Schoenthaler Residence 118 Stanley Road Burlingame, CA 94010 APN: 029-282-200 Dear Planning Commission RECEIVED AUG 14 2008 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. We are applying for two special permits so we can remove our existing garage (built in 1922) and rebuild a new tandem garage. The two special permits we are applying for are. 1. The proposed new garage will be 34' in length (longer than 28') 2. The proposed new garage location will be in the rear 40% of the lot. One of the major obstacles of the proposed new location of the garage is a beautiful large redwood tree located in the rear of our property. The tree has split into two trunks measuring 32' and 28' in diameter. (Picture attached) We have met with Mr. Steve Porter (City of Burlingame Arborist) who agreed that the tree is healthy and beautiful and for us to build the new garage around it without removing it. We have no desire to remove the tree and will not, it is gorgeous. Mr. Steve Porter has said this is a difficult situation. We need to conform to the required specification of a new garage, but we also need to keep the tree. He has told me that he is available to the Planning Commission to explain the circumstances of why we need to build the proposed garage in the location that Mr. Deal has drawn up. We have also consulted with Mayne Tree Expert Company to give us the best location of the new garage allowing the tree to grow and stay healthy. This area they have proposed will not affect the health of the tree nor the roots. With the tree's location and our large family (tandem garage desired) we are forced to go beyond the 30°/u up to the 40% thus requiring a special permit. The designer of this proposed new garage is Mr. Jerry Deal of JD and Associates, who has met with me several times at the property. Mayne Tree has also been present sharing their expert advice. We hired Kavanagh Engineering to survey the property and the topo is being submitted with our plans. They have been working with Mr. Deal on the proposed plan. Thank you for your consideration with our request for the two special permits. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. 650-548-9532 home Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. ESTABLISHED 1931 STATE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NO. 276793 CERTIFIED FORESTER CERTIFIED ARBORISTS PEST CONTROL ADVISORS AND OPERATORS RICHARD L. HUNTINGTON PRESIDENT 535 BRAGATO ROAD, STE. A SAN CARLOS, CA 94070-6228 IEROMEY INGALLS July 22008 ..` TELEPHONE: (650) 593-44W CONSULTANT/ESTIMATOR R E,v E i V E FACSIMILE: (650) 593-4443 Mr. Dan Schoenthaler EMAIL: info@maynelrcc.com 1433 Bernal Ave. AUG 1 Z��S Burlingame, CA 94010 CITY OF BURLINGAME Dear Mr. Schoenthaler, PLANNING DEPT. RE: 118 STANLEY ROAD, BURLINGAME On June 23, 2008, we met at the above referenced site to discuss potential tree impacts from moving the garage footprint. The eastward move would put the proposed new northeast garage comer at about three feet past the double-trunked redwood, Sequoia sempervirens, and the garage wall being about two feet south. There are visible roots in the nearby lawn, so there is a high probability of surface roots below the existing deck. I recommend hand digging the upper twelve inches for proposed pier -and -grade beam excavations. This will expose roots and the pier holes can be moved to avoid cutting roots over three inches in diameter. If there are a lot of large diameter roots, a slab -on -grade floor may be more root -friendly. The depth of the roots will also help in designing how deep the grade beams can go without causing root impacts. Have hand excavations inspected to determine potential impacts. The inspection can be coordinated with the contractor and the architect. The proposed garage footprint could cover more than forty percent of the root zone. With care, the roots below the proposed garage can remain and minimal impacts would be expected. Some roots can be cut, others may remain and be bridged over or around. Styrofoam® may reduce impacts to retained roots growing below concrete or through it. To protect the trunk and roots outside the garage footprint install fencing around the tree and still allow room, wrap the trunk with wood to protect them from physical impacts. Install these protections prior to any demolition of the existing deck and garage. I think this report is accurate and based on sound arboricuftural principles and practices. Report adjustments may be needed after inspection of the excavations to expose the roots. Sincerely, -:AF/1-4� Richard L. Huntington Certified Arborist WE #0119A Certified Forester #1925 RLH:pmd cc: Jerry Deal i(:-. lMWP--- Alp. P A DECEIVED AUG 14 2008 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. •O� r Vkv l6i � i�j1 0�4 „, Project Comments Date: August 14, 2008 To: d City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure at 118 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-200 Staff Review: August 18, 2008 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 4. Property boundary survey needs signature from licensed land surveyor/ engineer. Reviewed by: V V Date: 8/22/2008 Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: Project Comments August 14, 2008 ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 XChief Building Official (650) 558-7260 Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 Request for Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure at 118 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-200 August 18, 2008 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). 2) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 3) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 4) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 5) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 6) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 7) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 8) Comply with the new, 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential / non-residential buildings. Go to ham://www.energy.ca.gov/title24 for publications and details. 9) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. 10) On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within 1 ft. — 8 in. of the property line. 11) Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one -hour fire -rated construction. (Table 602) 12) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with Table 704.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 13) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 14) NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items must be re -submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed bv: Brooks MacNeil Date: 8/15/08 Project Comments Date: August 14, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure at 118 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-200 Staff Review: August 18, 2008 No further comments Reviewed by: Brooks MacNeil Date: 8115108 Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: Project Comments August14,2008 O City Engineer (650) 558-7230 O Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 O City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff O Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 of Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 t7 NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 O City Attorney Request for Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure at 118 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-200 August 18, 2008 No comment at this time. Reviewed by: ;,/��- Date: / -� V '- . It Date: To: From Subject: Staff Review: Project Comments August 14, 2008 0 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 0 Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 0 City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff 0 Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 0 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ✓ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney Request for Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure at 118 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-200 August 18, 2008 Implement construction best management practices and comply with the local stormwater ordinance. Please use attached brochure as guidance. Reviewed by: � Date: ©0 I w/ vy Remember: The property owner and the contractor share ultimate responsibility for the activities that occur on a construction sitQ. You will be held responsible for any environmental damages and associated clean-up costs. w,Y a%%�� San MmmCPYAIyW Ro.", F' � PAIIMion Plawmbn Pmwm G..R Construction & Site Supervision AY..a, µ.dgMmn. wrmYn Jandah wwvn.n+MdML.emnn h[ art �. a M•a. *. Iw:m ma rumba dm bn,m. � .lib bM[rmummnmherron Jleb W wme wmdam YMmeavda k.vlgbm..Mn/avlvkwvnlvMbh JwYM qe .m..Y Y ne.R wumR r•^. Yn (mM W N o-,XT mwbel rynum Mw w ban mym 1•mmllmlanby abrn mYmnww am .qmJ MYn. Rtivn/bvminnMfNmlYv b/ nnamX.P bmm.1 Pmake...rcb..m.Mn vMgli¢ JTnY rvmanPlv)m na wbn/m/tl/n Mqv rum Mvbm/wltlY nrnrpnMnwrbn W veneunhe [Ae InA.nrvbmvmM Wlnlbnm mmnkrearybvum W WHrgnmNlXY[ GNar•rra[OYgMram JPdNneue u�ltlb nvYYel vm Y[/eM1 pNXha.,dlevrtbakp W rmlb[9.IPam bm..m w/e.ymd.mJmueMwn.mr !rum mwm w nm INn laq YI bm-0 V mu. nry.NgamannrJnmYYu Jw: m�l/w.n lk..n[`w.r �mMrapon.r nLwmmmmnvhhdm N/+v.6nNm Jg�G .n xrnmW .mgm.vW mNm dmyvbpmpebmcntgv[Y n mbhn W Pngmm PNidrynb:AlMlm, Bvlmml, BrivMnt amlinRmm@bu.Aly Cly, f/u Ab AIp PmInC y,HdfMmn&y,HAY04oag1.Mmlu Puk MiMlae,Pndfq PMd/Nllry, RNx WGISSm On:m.W Cub/, Sea M•Im,90u1hSm Fmw6M Wmb ,C my of9m Mvlw Pollution Prevention — It's Part. of the Plan It is your responsibility to do the job right! Runoff from streets and otherpaved areas is a major source of pollutionin local creeks, San Francisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Construction activities can directly affect the health ofow waters unless contractors and crews plan ahead to keep dirt, debris, and other construction waste away from storm drains and creeks. Following these guidelines will ensure your compliance with local stormwater ordinance requirements. Remember, ongoing monitoring and maintenance of installed controls is crucial to proper implementation. Heavy Earth -Moving Roadwork & Paving Fresh Concrete Painting & Application Equipment Operation 0 a, A- L�CnanW W ey uEm11w Nh vAm M+bmhm®' im N/mlq kMmam nua•wmmm<• JMd naulmH.,mymnalmmr•nammnwlm JDaYmm•rulMamalmlvkml/m•r p•mmms- •He/wwmm•vmlinLMhnWIYa111unLL awkLmd•.yrnmvwnwwmawn Wm mmm W.gvjwmMYSIwIW.Wmwn JAvw dwlwd/hymvgmum.Wvw Mtl•W q[hMNYwa enm.vMEq WgNTMda•vl•vn[ktYM1 rva.Mwvmm4JebN0`m. JMq:nM/IIYMkb NAm ry muRrcnllwrmrm gnnlHmrulrm.Ylmb. JuurxsY Wn..ahml•d.mmmrravatlamn Am. Wamedum J Pammryb Wmnv4rnYr}M W Mkk W gb:vm.nNTmxYa J Cpwmvpemd ¢nwtl tllmwp/u.Mulner Plr•Xril:w4 Jlrrn .6Je WlTbmmrYLmalmrwW. Y,.m[ mu.mdnmr� mYmamr vWA.l J�nMN� mW:n.Mmn.n.mmmWueimw MrA d'ry W/all.mu JlTml 11 Wmnin nY ynuvmmhvaua imreYwEmnrcmuW.er tl Wavdm2rahmtlwmm JPgma/rgnn Nhm MnuuW Wkm•mNek nam.mmminmrtl> Jmmwemd,amuawrwan. •wwW/.r ran Jan ; d�IlnhvmlwYvn4eMmwnddw W J Pe,mY®.mW rmv/Yn.mtrmYrrmw. J OctJI WMmlMlrb W mmkbNmmuwY J �mhmmgnmkRW mbrdmob �wunHAvm Avwmmbvtla J tgmlmgJYPa•dkWgllryummJn[eulnmmM dnmdpe./mlm..mgwrm.mled wm/r EvnmMn W nYL J m mwabbl aluxnlm.n[b wbbw• J na`�yd v a} n/mnY. nmw. Y.Im mNLL.m wlvmlwh4 JTubaryegenMmuPO:mtrvlw+gmvuwNm GenW lvhm l'nmla j„y¢.yl:nq}wlJalk/Mm WMws. J Req-JvvW Mk64 vA¢ JSIW,IvbmnlblWmdlTnuY mrayrvnP:v. JCyd6}rAenNw bG6enrrYumdndnl/au Jevbmmp:.m[Nmn:RYnmm>Avn Mld,b (`=ny, Cn)rYmtlepMwdlranMwl.w JWVI`T`eWSHp}..tli`m _ q W[rv..rYvb.a[n ao Lgr•n JNmmAwemn•Ym�P.m[mlwhq wv JMmne.Mavn&lnlMY.quknnammmmwv gym°^mom �W /sln mgm/mmnnan Mn TYbtumgaamY�mm- Mmm.ammM.Rw.mwwrMm++..mr JumW mydmN4 m/IWrYgAm urnw� W(dxwK.lmMJpmIMv,WbrnegMmm, Avmmm�aNm Ynvbymlmutl rwY1a 1lpuMwwuv,w}umuPhmkep JAmy vmaMabtlmkynwrumb rn YY mnM M do bwn JmmwelW ealeYbh[umebu eR.alvennlw J A.mrmrandapwmJ/hvnmmN. Nmrb WmgHaPuar:a•as�+um'v mumv/Pw AWY/r ntla n/..Y J Antlnmhf r�NhkahbtYO/M/Rvnn uk[b'mcngm n/YMdwY[w bryMn IluulMenmu ryubk MmNwnYY. uvlw[J IwuryaYJwmdlbnwahnW w6rmnmmMtlbn :mngeR46nIWmr(j,aiYCm^f And: JA�vYmtbPMVMN.in®.MYmmmww/A Jtlm WMM,vnYnwn tl M 1A61mm Wrm°AY gp/k,W rb/pwm/Y4 Jw1vun6[Fm mrmmdwmlwminm/nwiA abMlmdnmm+rtu wL . umamf mdebgmaml:.,mdn ni411vnM. l4Nn/IetlpanYlhlebygnmknbiE nynm[ • phuMNvaupemi rub ALudWVYY JPIm� � enh lameWe[uwmh6 S.`a /yMa MuaIRJ%Ym/nvgtibyl/nW men •Ranpnrta4eNl.nwR vw YmryfvmhMmnnrmnW v lYenlhu[nbu/nlMmbmwnNkbdWlp JNmIM/nwnvrmmwngl^a'/aaln Wdry vRTvryuneTAL¢YIh RllmivaeLvxb: IIAIY v 11mp+.6W nnPmnnyw:mnvMn xICJI m/p made MGmnv'.OMaPmvpmp5vdm Wurim C.nn,aemxuxnfmMMm} feWRmbm/IMm/ JdgapvrrN W Memk¢W/•h aam a mggyWwwbN6mdwmm.MlYMrmn Nngx W nnM PmanerywmgJ,flamdvR Questions? Call the Office of Environmental Compliance (650)342-3727 of Solvents & Adhesives xmmpr rYY rWm J xw d vwe wm P W.a..a awn n.., rn. pbm.mlmm.ubW eb¢vdamaRAam/^� mmdwwm W w.Mep:wa •ra.Mmdw b mltnbn n[ilAy ravnnpml¢dYmMv Landscaping, Gardening, and Pool Maintenance u uu Jninq[m .a.nmm�`i.ra�I+ni.mmaT. JAnvrndvtlghNFvv5 W nlneMmbl, lnlmnn J savmbydmmwgHwmm:lewvmhT b/dm.rwwmNm vMtlenmmm[pNv[rry rmnpm4mnm auynbpr.WnmK hYMR d[uq JNnw [Yu nmlvrt Xue Nbl ntlJm++hl[[ JAM6.1[ptlhfWvmwi[ryq'sb ry bynnmv. JMgmmnwandmnhbaekP.wmdwlnm mm.v.lm, n.m Ynq n[nem Jd.lmtl[,.ry Mdd.nn Yma.m e;mlrvMr.nry MymlyudnAmMxYYMllpm m mXenN JEvw[IWunLplMpMl mlbNnmmn Nml Ymnumn eiLLa lv6n[ewtlw lnnvnl[pW{LlW tllymm au �xai�¢ehpm[[!m`Yv[t�[[Ihb Nv bY.RAwmWwhrymmnmmmvbw OlM �ryvW JMm bnc[IIM:nm 4i�lmsmhm�v b. ep[d�m[bmNnY[vnM01 �vdClmmwnnaYW W Ymr. u.w e..m. m.v[abhgwYmm JW[e-0ual PblVpYnlm MNmubeaMlmr JPo4n[heb[[eatlkel fnvRminenlM 4r mepf [aLLn /kla[W[MnlmmhvwmMYb[pgarmmYm, u%Ym JMiNiPmm OMmnvnevamvmuW:Mntll flhlWMumlem/mav%mn Chmuvlmemn W:v[Vxeu Wmtlwmme _ u[h[h% W[W JrWIYMW( mbM ekNan RLn run. J Rn [r[tl Vrm/mYl Ybm,mmquerAmTamle hW imaw' Wan. mdm[mummurynlm Alm elAm[ dq [Lyu JL•ml Jb[WeelMmmnYmam, d7'YXpbt mWm[hmevh. J dim bMOWbVgpalMrvrywv,Y4mhmm m me m.e MYnm ngMmmrgnnmm�d YNaee dT[keY medM[LNm wL JOIRavvrmwLMblammpmgm/Ymn �m JCMska Pl[IYdgiymalv[W dWmdgm JmnmllmnmlE•d•eejryJrµrrvnMPwu.WW Ih,u/nvYdmban M1enmXm PYY/mpinM1 m.hhYakJ /rl�met Wmnh0.aPlrevnYp.nImTYM1 Jbenn404.mnagfimeenvix/1•d[maWW LmvlYdTmdwAvLmmmt - Jmml I bmlmmLbrim wnG/rW bbYgnNwgrnpM1 mmhmedn J,MmpryfJlLe[d>•Sy4reYlepenmYnrpNd- mdJevxW riY mxelAp.WntllpY9/•eMnhb MmnnV.nbvknnneMa Mal m[Ivmm[W mna b[Pkb b[MmdE[p x[mvunn d.mu Jflw MYMbvemwmanlemtla�bx.dcrem wmEiyWelY[bLd.eNnk Mm MbW wmnvu u[IWpO Mlmgmu rverum[ M[wmvafnmeT��'^mrv[mwbb M1sda w ) aW �4mmmllWdgmeYWwimY JW vn Ymw mek[naem Nm l![/pvL Maw6w. mac iuMkra(Mr[mem4ngYMmuilM J.YbenNrt PlmlRMmeb M6w[Rq[rtr¢ ram^•WWmmnmOMHY VYALbemb4 _ JNnmeiuM[dbm+4ls[wb[mnm[.me[v W dTaupA•A% R[TxNnr[fJ:ewp(m[mYnewprbM mmtlnY. J p>ph WPv[MWvlhWwmrcw Y[hWIY JLaphmtlhNma(wu[min}vN pwltl[ bssbblmraMwumPm4n Mly.vuq. JWb:n[npbP/Na vy>♦bdbllmalu p'e M[Sm JAgaMdmn+Y.M[m<mtlryamenepN .[YnIMYw Oam[uYH.wlyNiveup ud bnkmlu.Y Mew.ybYTmd.rar 1G[nTmin}kamb/d[Mbpkp[bJHanv[ lnerwe mYrcdw Memnl.angmwm/.um ma m.mYMlnr Lgbe/WarykW6t a.+i. J NnmMnynfdmhmidm•wuwv'aL Jpuu MXmv M4uee P[Inn AITn[nnw'geµ JQbnvwtln[mmyMu6nnuVtlntluwkuy Iwwbe.xePekuwnawlm/b. mm.`+nrba[trmn.up q Imnhf r•M.u.ui'IM J eomLNYgfumm OwNelrtvAMSUMmm lbn da:ryEwbmvlYFWhOi+W nrtpd4¢Yahl Lv[dm. ubbewi. Jw.nw[gpnJ[me nY/[tle¢4eM [lea and Nbm/e,[Qn Jmemrvmaryycdud lmld/rut Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25,000 per day! Jµ b. .rmbl m.yn.dhmMm mdbq. �CTMbn.wm umunkllb.d[mn.IlY b.+' M Iq, wsk eM In wmernY/diy u Ruy. Innr vmnea nr my mnu. In.lm.l rbn I. RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMITS RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits for a new detached garage at 118 Stanley Road. zoned R-1. Daniel and Susan Schoenthaler, property owners. APN: 029-282-200; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 14, 2008, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15303 Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Class 3 (e), Accessory (appurtenant) structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. 2. Said Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A' attached hereto. Findings for such Conditional Use Permit and Special Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14'h day of September, 2008 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption, Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits. 118 Stanley Road Effective October 24, 2008 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped October 1, 2008, sheets G-1, G-2 and Boundary and Topographic Survey and that any changes to footprint or floor area of the accessory structure shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the waste line to the accessory structure shall be no larger than two inches; 3. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection measures as defined in the arborist report by Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. and date stamped by the Planning Department August 14, 2008; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's August 15, 2008 memo, the NPDES Coordinator's August 18, 2008 memo and the City Engineer's August 22, 2008, memo shall be met; 5. that if the accessory structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. CITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX (650) www.burlingame.org Site: 118 STANLEY ROAD The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2008 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits for a new detached garage at 118 STANLEY ROAD zoned R-1. APN 029-282-200 Mailed: October 3, 2008 (Please refer to other side) 016H16504325 $00270 R Z Mailed FMM 94010 us POSTAGE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CitsE of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may. be reviewed prior to the rneeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you .may be limited to r someone else raised at the public hearing, raising only those issues you o desctibed in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenahts about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558 7250.;Thank'you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) City of Burlingame Item No. Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits Study Item Address: 118 Stanley Road Meeting Date: September 22, 2008 Request: Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure that will be erected closer than 4' to any other structure on the same lot and Special Permits for an accessory structure that is greater than 28' in length and that is exempt from setback requirements and is located within the rear 40% of the lot. Applicant and Property Owners: Daniel and Susan Schoenthaler APN: 029-282-200 Designer: JD & Associates Lot Area: 5,750 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Project Description: The site currently contains a single -story, three -bedroom house and a detached one -car garage. There is no work proposed on the house as part of this project. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing 261 SF detached one -car garage and to build a new 382.5 SF detached one -car garage in its place. Because the proposed detached garage is exempt from setback requirements and is located within the rear 40% of the lot and because the proposed garage is greater than twenty-eight (28) feet in length, two Special Permits are required. A Conditional Use Permit is also required as part of the project because the proposed detached garage will be erected closer than four (4) feet to another structure on the same property. With the removal of the existing detached garage and the addition of the proposed detached garage, the floor area will increase from 1,869 SF (0.33 FAR), to 1,990.5 SF (0.35 FAR), where 3,322.5 SF (0.58 FAR) is the maximum allowed (project is 1,332 SF below the maximum allowed FAR). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required forthe existing three (3) bedroom house. The existing detached garage will be removed and replaced with a new detached garage (10' x 20', clear interior measurements) which will provide one (1) covered space, and one (1) uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other zoning code requirements have been met. The applicant is requesting the following applications: Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure that will be erected closer than four (4) feet to any other structure on the same lot (1'-7" proposed, measured eave to eave) (CS 25.60.010 e); • Special Permit for an accessory structure that is in the rear of the lot and that is more than twenty-eight (28) feet in length (CS 25.28.035 e); and • Special Permit for a detached garage exempt from setback restrictions located within the rear forty (40) percent of the lot (CS 25.28.035 d). 118 Stanley Road Lot Area: 5,750 SF Plans date stamped: August 29, 2008 I EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED Front Setback to Garage: 67'-2" (rear 41.6%) 69'-0" (rear 40%d)' Rear 30% Right Setback to Garage: 1'-4" 0'-8" 0'-0" (with survey) Rear Setback to Garage: 23'-8" 12'-0" 0'-0" (with survey) Garage Setback To Other 1 Structures: j 2'-0" (to chimney) 3'-10" (to house) 1 W" (eave to chimney)Z 1'-10" (eave to eave) 4'-0" (measured eave to eave) Lot Coverage: 1,957.1 SF 34% 2,078.5 SF j 36% i 2,300 SF 40% Conditional Use Permit and Special Permits 118 Stanley Road EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED Floor Area Ratio: 1,869.1 SF 1,990.5 SF 3,322.5 SF 0.33 FAR 0.35 FAR 0.58 FAR # of bedrooms: 3 no change --- Parking: 1 covered 1 covered 1 covered (10' x 20') (10' x 20') (10' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') (9' x 20') Garage Height: n/a 15'-0" max. at rear 15'-0" Special Permit for a detached garage exempt from setback restrictions located within the rearforty (40) percent of the lot (CS 25.28.035 d). : Conditional Use Permit for an accessory structure that will be erected closer than four (4) feet to any other structure on the same lot (1'-7" proposed, measured eave to eave) (CS 25.60.010 e). ' (0.32 x 5,750 SF) + 1100 SF + 382.5 SF = 3,322.5 SF (0.58 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer and NPDES Coordinator. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner C. Daniel Schoenthaler, property owner, 118 Stanley Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 JD and Associates, applicant, 875 Mahler Road Suite 200, Burlingame, CA 94010 Attachments:' Application to the Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit and Special Permit Forms Applicant's Letter of Explanation Arborist Report from Mayne Tree Expert Company, date stamped August 14, 2008 Photographs of existing double-trunked redwood tree in rear yard Staff Comments Aerial Photo -2- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010 p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: ❑ Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Parcel #: 02'I - 702- ZDO ❑ Conditional Use Permit ® Special Permit ❑ Other: PROJECT ADDRESS: // $ 57,+V4= y IRC>A�1> CA gV010 (9 Please indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person)( PROPERTY OWNER project contact person OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: 541-10 CN77-/A LE7-, L7fi �iEL�TJS9/✓ Name: SGi�D��l 77 /R I �A.vr�L�SJS�� I Address: // 3 57;�9-✓c.Ey .t,cA1> Address: (l � -f Q'� Y 2c `t om City/State/Zip: 'Jt1.2[.1^/�4^1 4 C4 W016 City/State/Zip: 8✓'��� l'rt / eA 9Yolo Phone: b50 5VY - 953 Z Phone: 6--'O Fax: 6S0 Sy 8 - lqq Fax: & d;0 s4 8 - / Y e/ 1 E-mail: CIAIV 5udoC<J 774A /c7 )la1400, Czo,AE-mail: 44A1J5c- l06W n4g4--f� 9 )14*00 . &-;Q ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person)( OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑ Name: SD A�j7 .455oc,ArEs Address: $rS 7�Ahlc �2 RG4 t� Ste: r� Zov City/State/Zip: ?�y,zL , lgq.vt� Gt1 �4U/a Phone: 44'0 69 -7- 131 c` Fax: 86b' S99 - 7SCt iVED AUG ? 4 2008 E-mail: 0FF/C6 6 ?DF.ELA5se>c, R7'cS. c,L>vl = CITY OF BURLMGAME PLANNING DEPT. * Burlingame Business License #: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TEA,-,.VfJ POLJ.J- 6192a6E -n{/tT IS F,4e 1-415 Dcxel=t?, �`"z3J �. a ,,� cL r4 iv c:,✓ Ta:,t DCm 6,a,z� 3E , AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief Applicant's signature: "- `�� Date:A ✓ q Z!<� I am aware of the proposed applicv djhereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: Date: /y�v3 2lLp'pi Date submitted: gl i �r0o ,t Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. SAHandouts\PC Application 2008-B.handout RECEIVED CONDMONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION — CITY OF BURLINGAME AUG 6 9 2008 Schoenthaller residence garage CITY OF S RLINGAPA 118 Stanley Rd PLANNING DEPI . Burlingame, CA 94010 Conditional use permit for distance between dwelling and adjoining accessory structure Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. The new garage is being constructed, with regard to the existing dwelling and Chimney, at the same distance apart. The new garage will be several feet back from the existing and therefore, there is actually a lessening of the area which needs a conditional use permit. How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? The proposed use is a detached garage which serves as an accessory structure to a residence in the R-1 zone. This use is in accordance with the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 3 How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? • The proposed structure matches the character of the dwelling and sits in approximately the same location. The presence of a large double trunk Redwood tree precludes moving the garage back further. • The use (garage in an R-1 zone) is consistent with the neighborhood. City of Burlingame • Community Development Department • 501 Primrose Road • P (650) 558-7250 • F (650) 696-3790 • w .burlinoame.om 1VE L BURLINGAMH CITY `OF.BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION AUG 14 200i1 uRLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. 3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)? 4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Rev. 07.2007 SPECIAL.PERMIT.FRM SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION — CITY OF BURLINGAME Schoenthaller Residence RECEIVED 118 Stanley Road Burlingame, CA 94010 AUG 1 4 2008 Special permit for an accessory structure greater than 28 feet in length. CITY OF BURLINGAME New garage proposal is 34' long. PLANNING DEPT. Existing garage is 24' long 1 Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood • The location of the garage is at the end of a long driveway and is the dominant character in the neighborhood. • The garage is a tandem/single car width due to the location of the existing dwelling and a large redwood tree. • The adjoining neighbor to the south has been advised to all aspects of the new garage and is supportive. 2 Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood • The exterior finishes match that of the main dwelling. • The style is consistent with the main dwelling and the eclectic character of the neighborhood. • The roof pitch of the garage is steeper than the main dwelling to allow for attic storage. The dwelling does not have much storage as is typical of many homes in the area. 3 How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (C.S 25.57)? • The design guidelines ask that an addition or accessory structure to an existing residence be true to the architecture of the neighborhood. The garage is compatible with the neighborhood style and will enhance the aesthetics of that neighborhood. 4 Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate N • No trees are to be removed with this accessory structure. A large redwood tree dictates the location of the garage. SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION — CITY OF BURLINGAME FR E V E I V E D Schoenthaller Residence AUG 14 Z008 118 Stanley Road CITY OF BURLINGAME Burlingame, CA 94010 °LANNING DEPT, Special permit for encroachment of an accessory structure into the rear 40% of the lot. New garage proposal is 34' long. Existing garage is 24' long and currently extends beyond the rear 40% of the lot. A double car garage is not possible due to the location of the dwelling and a large redwood tree Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood • The location of the garage is at the end of a long driveway and is the dominant character in the neighborhood. • The garage is a tandem/single car width due to the location of the existing dwelling and a large redwood tree. • The adjoining neighbor to the south has been advised to all aspects of the new garage and is supportive. 2 Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood • The exterior finishes match that of the main dwelling. • The style is consistent with the main dwelling and the eclectic character of the neighborhood. • The roof pitch of the garage is steeper than the main dwelling to allow for attic storage. The dwelling does not have much storage as is typical of many homes in the area. 3 How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city (CS. 25.5;9? •. The design guidelines ask that an addition or accessory structure to an existing residence be true to the architecture of the neighborhood. The garage is compatible with the neighborhood style and will enhance the aesthetics of that neighborhood. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is appropriate N • No trees are to be removed with this accessory structure. A large redwood tree dictates the location of the garage. August 14, 2008 Planning Commission Community Development Department City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94040 ry REC✓ VE V RE: Special Permit Request AUG 14 2008 Schoenthaler Residence 118 Stanley Road Burlingame, CA 94010 CITY PLANNING DEPT. APN: 029-282-200 Dear Planning Commission: We are applying for two special permits so we can remove our existing garage (built in 1922) and rebuild a new tandem garage. The two special permits we are applying for are: 1. The proposed new garage will be 34' in length (longer than 28') 2. The proposed new garage location will be in the rear 40% of the lot. One of the major obstacles of the proposed new location of the garage is a beautiful large redwood tree located in the rear of our property. The tree has split into two trunks measuring 32' and 28' in diameter. (Picture attached) We have met with Mr. Steve Porter (City of Burlingame Arborist) who agreed that the tree is healthy and beautiful and for us to build the new garage around it without removing it. We have no desire to remove the tree and will not, it is gorgeous. Mr. Steve Porter has said this is a difficult situation. We need to conform to the required specification of a new garage, but we also need to keep the tree. He has told me that he is available to the Planning Commission to explain the circumstances of why we need to build the proposed garage in the location that Mr. Deal has drawn up. We have also consulted with Mayne Tree Expert Company to give us the best location of the new garage allowing the tree to grow and stay healthy. This area they have proposed will not affect the health of the tree nor the roots. With the tree's location and our large family (tandem garage desired) we are forced to go beyond the 30% up to the 40% thus requiring a special permit. The designer of this proposed new garage is Mr. Jerry Deal of JD and Associates, who has met with me several times at the property. Mayne Tree has also been present sharing their expert advice. We hired Kavanagh Engineering to survey the property and the topo is being submitted with our plans. They have been working with Mr. Deal on the proposed plan. Thank you for your consideration with our request for the two special permits. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. 650-548-9532 home Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. ESTABLISHED 1931 STATE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NO. 276793 CERTIFIED FORESTER CERTIFIED ARBORISTS PEST CONTROL ADVISORS AND OPERATORS RICHARD L. HUNTINGTON 535 BRAGATO ROAD, STE. A PRESIDENT SAN CARLOS, CA 94070-6228 IEROMEY INGALLS July 2, 2008 ��j`p TELEPHONE: (650) 593-4400 CONSULTANT/ESTIMATOR REV'E{\II V ED FACSINCLE: (650)593-4443 Mr. Dan Schoenthaler EMAIL: info@maynen xom 1433 Bernal Ave. AUG 14 2008 Burlingame, CA 94010 CITY OF BURLINGAME Dear Mr. Schoenthaler, PLANNING DEPT. RE: 118 STANLEY ROAD, BURLINGAME On June 23, 2008, we met at the above referenced site to discuss potential tree impacts from moving the garage footprint. The eastward move would put the proposed new northeast garage comer at about.three feet past the double-trunked redwood, Sequoia sempervirens, and the garage wall being about two feet south. There are visible roots in the nearby lawn, so there is a high probability of surface roots below the existing deck. I recommend hand digging the upper twelve inches for proposed pier -and -grade beam excavations. This will expose roots and the pier holes can be moved to avoid cutting roots over three inches in diameter. If there area lot of large diameter roots, a slab -on -grade floor may be more root -friendly. The depth of the roots will also help in designing how deep the grade beams can go without causing root impacts. Have hand excavations inspected to determine potential impacts. The inspection can be coordinated with the contractor and the architect. The proposed garage footprint could cover more than forty percent of the root zone. With care, the roots below the proposed garage can remain and minimal impacts would be expected. Some roots can be cut, others may remain and be bridged over or around. Styrofoam@ may reduce impacts to retained roots growing below concrete or through it. To protect the trunk and roots outside the garage footprint install fencing around the tree and still allow room, wrap the trunk with wood to protect them from physical impacts. Install these protections prior to any demolition of the existing deck and garage. 1 think this report is accurate and based on sound arboriculturel principles and practices. Report adjustments may be needed after inspection of the excavations to expose the roots. Sincerely, Richard L. Huntington �`� t$� L1ly Bo Certified Arborist WE #0119A Certified Forester#1925 _z No.yet, 0f1 RLH:pmd * m cc: Jerry Deal o� _ Ao # IN 156 -0 4p * It. 0 C�• * Jr p "z*•ffi�.®'_-_ `. •11'11 its � b♦ 1 1 d�� l I K fi .. !. ny t•, bpi a aY ,.:' .� �' 5 Yfi y P Rs � .a .• t ._ C -. yr � �} ^ si� My Now A+ry: .y �i i ' t Project Comments Date: August 14, 2008 To: d City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure at 118 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-200 Staff Review: August 18, 2008 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. 4. Property boundary survey needs signature from licensed land surveyor/ engineer. Reviewed by: V V Date: 8/22/2008 Project Comments Date: August 14, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 XChief Building Official (650) 558-7260 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure at 118 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-200 Staff Review: August 18, 2008 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). 2) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 3) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 4) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 5) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 6) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 7) When you submit your plans to the Building Division for plan review provide a completed Supplemental Demolition Permit Application. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 8) Comply with the new, 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential / non-residential buildings. Go to http://www.energv.ca.gov/title24 for publications and details. 9) Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the property line. 10) On the plans specify that the roof eaves will not project within 1 ft. — 8 in. of the property line. 11) Indicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the property line will be built of one -hour fire -rated construction. (Table 602) 12) On the plans show that all openings in exterior walls, both protected and unprotected, will comply with Table 704.8. Provide a table or chart that specifies 1) the openings allowed and; 2) the size and percentage of the openings proposed. 13) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 14) NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items must be re -submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. Reviewed bv: Brooks MacNeil Date: 8/15/08 Project Comments Date: August 14, 2008 To: ❑ City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure at 118 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-200 Staff Review: August 18, 2008 No further comments Reviewed by: Brooks MacNeil Date: 8115108 Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review Project Comments August14,2008 d City Engineer (650) 558-7230 O Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 of Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 O NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 O City Attorney Request for Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure at 118 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-200 August 18, 2008 No comment at this time. Reviewed by: Date: o Date: To: From: Subject: Staff Review: Project Comments August 14, 2008 0 City Engineer (650) 558-7230 0 Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 0 City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff 0 Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7271 0 Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ✓ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney Request for Conditional Use Permits for a new accessory structure at 118 Stanley Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-282-200 August 18, 2008 Implement construction best management practices and comply with the local stormwater ordinance. Please use attached brochure as guidance. Reviewed by: Date: oR WET Remember: The property owner and the contractor share ultimate responsibility for the activities that occur on a construction site. You will be held responsible for any environmental damages and associated clean-up costs. 1 4 \ San Mu NB nionW ,,ormwYer ^s� mYt Pollmion Plenmbn Pwpum G ..m. Construction & Site Supervision . N.n.rypm.nwrnN JXJebb®ntlx °ni RtlYRaYPMn 4r N .nn rN� T. rM.. a n.w rim raw M°9eluly pYo¢Y/oWmmnwhb(w .VW JLr.lr aW P.Yd n..namn Yu.NdNn.re. Jama mmnn rmn.mm[w n.Lmmam Ju¢A ne amm�.rnmrtenmYgnvPNm 1MJrYIM[anrvb.) M11°Jybm ramt•+ rNwmnmr:Y.Yy emYw.Ywm.nnm :aava MJu. RMrmmnm°mnnIYMSIenM yyvmAYn Jinx ),m vyblw.N nnnamtlm M,ka ns , i%1. m.mnwnm�bmrb mmnn4,4vrwrnv4vmbum, WmMnm Prvgmn Ppdicipmm AXNnm 9e1nAl, 116hil BUN ngame,@Ma 9dy City, B,al Polo An, Fwa City, H[Iflown Bry H IYApmugh Menlo Park Mill6ne. Fuifi q PoNli Polley, Rt nvuW Crry, Sm Bn w.Sm Cuba Sen MNm.SYdh San Frum:tco, Wand ide.Counly l'S. Wm. Pollution Prevention — It's Part of the Plan It is your responsibility to do the job right! Runoff from streets and other paved areas is a major source ofpollutionin local creeks, San Francisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Construction activities can directly affect the health of our waters unless contractors and crews plan abead to keep dirt, debris, and other construction waste away from storm drains and creeks. Following these guidelines will ensure your compliance with local stormwater ordinance requirements. Remember, ongoing monitoring and maintenance of installed controls is crucial to proper implementation. Heavy Earth -Moving Roadwork & Paving Fresh Concrete Painting & Application im N.Wm k r.mm/•. noel. rwmnn Jork,u° mMwrm.Me.mnr bmmmm. nm.N.mnmgmnnie„r w,mme,m', In1aR (nu:e W °xNmmphF{,rmW4n0. W mnln MWeW WlpmtlNnmm. JMJmY W M:kb W Asvy W jnmtlmrygm� yunlrYWTYlv4 w.s .em^s anr,: Fn $�nl.'�. /h�,iq:W lYdm_ImY,MtlbermeddAb _.�. /SddoY amAb W pWn^.AevNtiAra na,:l hnrneewr /mttYlyYRwrRrYYaW:pYNrtln9YN^W -.inyn6e bnquhne®- /PnRmnm}emb4m0.npY,.W mmN{JwF' rnY' mtng0.nbeMnabaYn J[W odwrry:nr,7gnulm4wYmmnlm IttYm^mY:[m.ikWA:\w¢aWvmmavLb mvm,bmµp/xmYNMY ^^mbiww) ,ipmwtmmamulmgmrkn•al.hdwi prawn Nn W Ab J F:nuatmmrrMenluRenmq unv.Wama J D+A avagmlalle NYk{Y w.iun°AFmmrN enh, �'ATWq aN,FnerY+nam,NNh NnYn J�N..w JIMrAnmNm.b°tn nW:a4 m. !raw nmmn Pam° Jumehd MmeYAuu Y.mnmvnvW ram JinheryxpaNmlyOeabrommRwbpnenn J MmmPm:nW,MnuRrtpJ.fmnaNvdkY W FmmwNnNlJm. J4mnmepYVWmm+utl,NIN:A„mMlmpw IWmgm:IN Jlrpumi NnWrTWrnemrNl.rMlmm®bt wmhW mJamr birryuwemebxvm J� m.tnWw:W°JImJr W,ib.m epJ PNWyaP.6[vn NlNmrnutlt,nnY k Anma anminanW ,ep.Yn4nrepuWam d1Yax JM1b. uM1mlmr^uw JT,YsMK^n NYuelwMndrJwnm„unY mW4wlnennnwnYwlry. 4 1 1 4 b JII r wrgnxn. Fnm'm J [.Y.nymrM W M.wnm+i. NY J.vn po-. bx N.N wn..YmY w m.w. pummel Nm wuWwacr�wanwm\Y4mNu Questidm? Call the Office of Environmental Compliance (650) 342-3727 of Solvents & Adhesives �1 Ha::my+JN +,NN J Nmp ap pT:ld INn prmuaM1 eN m bin Am My Igadnv,Yr¢4°NYnvemlm Ll,atlmWn nm IMaa Wmm.nMw.{hK W tlmdn XulYue .uNmXYrlm4W lmvvymlmlmee,Ab�nm m[:n•4 Landscaping, Gardening, and Pool Maintenance m nu J eAnmeNlvaNbNrnlAgmmeAJr mmm4q W Nn Ly.mA,a:mn bh rm m navtl dmJe YmM1y J Sm Mretla mNrmY N ala eYn4ah Yawn m J rmmbpn'®Yn JYPn°npn. Bann YtM Y.tlaenM°puNn¢ wMtlemeamNlorHvrmylnn{anq Wm BYKMxO,WrvmR MlNxp elemy JNva den bwtnn dN[p°YemYYenr xr.a ' JXemeulrpMtl[a:Y nmwbanefNrwNvnlM1v. J YAd°arembnr.sm,.yYampumn./,e. .,.r, j°•'nvann.,w m InY, n rnvm Jlbnq:er^)dud mwn4rJam d'nnrvnNYavT YymYYdnM1meMMnvlrnA} m°YmA JfiAii V WJk PYrm YalbbCu¢rmr lmr,bv Lob+ l.vnm MYyW LIywJu ISYNem Lit n RAp.MmwrapmR4 nvnYMUINMFW . m^L PnknnmrmrldmAmMnmR:daOvlp'. JPNmn°nrbYXbW mWM1Ob4t'nglhamm M 4e mhm M1rmpYt+v WPue NanO°or Yn NaxrPnwnLenaMn xeMPFW punlmwwet M yw, ram mdn4 dMnR Yleiq n °Inmt J Fer,Wutl pYl1pM1n mY,NUNbvnYr Nr' JMq,lrmnha:,rarlYer lanJmrY°narr°Ifrt ddR 4vRmm� YLeW<ImmpgW nnMeb rpgmrmeniv, n)YY JBmtrhPnmv NM1mmmevamuNtlmprwY b4Yne(®. w Yrm{ FinWW u mtlmwm `�W �uln MJNwnm W JIM NYtleidw[:mmx JP<rwW Y^YxmJl mkmnnm,nerM1nti plbrle +alnr mn.W J L.mI tlF°Wdarbv°rsJUNwdn r:dPYp Wnanl ni-i. vruPWu:t pITm NA^J n,.4 .1. nnJmn F:bnu6 JYvvmwdodspbMA^Nwvly.epFw^er JC�mm—r,ulClnul�umm4mknw4WMY bv: �. m1 YM eWXq mpNnngvpmd4vd Yrlmm P^¢ dmhrYF pra¢+nrrd WlWpnroxvYfniY JYSmtlYeIgYJIvn:MmyrJmxtrmNmUn. dYebN me JTmrl efbtY Jq:lvY°fvareprkLLauEvmdu.nm JRm,tleoMwkYM1merlm amdenxA lmmW. JXMble®w1a W1^lYl^ot MtryvnP¢ mimmYwYxd^Ik.tnnWbram J(SdbNbnMwMbe:Y.INumrYerhnl Truml mmawwmeM.mamam. Y.eA.mW wln. y„qq mJ¢meNn JrhnNdpYtNdglY rtLmW dNMPK J[bLmlmnW {mmatlFdPPmi•{nub.Nars RWtM4rY)pN^L °vhr VaA4,dq m14sY. (mm nrdmpdob rpJaY naNYYt NM °rhluM IemmhR [IaPifa¢Ymry�Wmryvat Y Wd. N•n•JLmHMen Av nTM^ JraMmmynrpP:mnrtpJnmYnun PeJrorN. JCeafuP,n TYYW 4drutly 4rrnuYpmlMO JxnYnynV.mw:IlmeArtnnlprbemninn. Xv:murYelTmLduM1v.mmrWan JArxpbuYYLnmeln WYet lrrnn:nmFWvlm JHawM1°raemm'tlr:f P.'n:mlwl:rtmm:my< JWhanbFywt,i4 udkWq NmuIWYw¢M inn,,,, tmfiRAwekYWrmmmamml �W nmrmYAyalwm N:aNw YpnY.wmM1mueln my W,lW hm fi:v JMYmuNh{rrbnlyYJYlq WmxnwYNd� mRJmyW nanrn)elip,4wtllgJW vtlpenin ,mnnamwelullmrt NYLlW endnq:mem. Mbnm/Y°mtMWamefiNmyOnnW wiry JUbn WrmpYrrymYNYlgen Nm® Irsun W.Obrk,vn Ln4 M,M1n1¢mm nYv YYe mpNgp gytnmJmprenmb¢hnL M l•PtvlNr^rmIL.AIY^. WW ^pl ^Ymxn numvnm Nm. ymbn^JmaM JflvbYlnW veYvmJmemtldr bnrrmpab ms eTtlrW W.p.eb+knlYMbnlnnkrry YJWIIEpNmgsYyuevAn nmJYa lfYm:mwnm.mMmm{hremT Meba Jenn JBumruxdxrl,IlwgM1:nuxrNnpuilwnl^pnn JA2YwvWa4ntlm YYmueN[l.bmam.ml ytu,xvdYmT14 ^^'mrw[mwbbn4n Ae nll^dnumm�lN>munm{n(mpm woa 1 Y{ nvuemeel:lAalelbw4Y mx myl rlxd Jpn nu boon rYe mvq era hN lm root J �rrm:YMIW N:^md.xMmYYLn NrvnY. WmAPrmpulpuJNprnmo MrW,nm.. vLvnv b.+N 'uNN {.� {WM1•mm�ry JNdemuY LArrhnMrtb b^rnnenF' JtyM1myumin YpeNq.M.uabddupanrinpbn anumm�dlpmnonfMxmrmtl4yJ:Nwudr4 rIYWAT4mJF{beelrb r.Lpu,WNep Mdxrnnn xnbinhYm wY^YL mm,w hryJem UmuYYawm¢pmhY fwewm:u,L. rmryueL Ifgsflbe®atln/u°tlemdW MmnmmYul'm m^� JAneYYh{TetlEnxawatrmeYmsxJ WYT^. Pmryy. RN.xlamerJN'v PdN ••M•es N^dx JNnr4tiv{seAbN^W pinwvnbm.tmn¢ ,m:mM4 J�WnYTY,mYn.enMdjdnTWp^i^AY W vasmOrYnbW WmQmYY�mNd Bn•L: � A:drmdpY®rnm Mrm JWI^u^mber^A®trim XelmrclnmmmnM JP¢pY W{teb::mnrtN.mm�mm�ntmYl[. JMANerelt"mnfwa,NOJW pYAn Iwn4YlnrmhansY mnnkn Mln.nen Y. JWhnnopb{. I,yuM\NdbnwWrynlerlp ebrmin ernundnM.dL { • I1mmY mr mNllbn.Gmdmnnn,nrm^ nbJlerxnlC JYIinn Jbm[mrmmefneeYNmvna rrm, : m0.vviYyay rnpypJneaµaN imn.iBrn AleNvunMNFxp ApM:Jryemee vmn • AGNvneu:ubq:vntl onb Jpmynnr:Y/��ennen\IAAEwIn{YnMIe6Pn•el WmWrbBYlnrE bnlgrrq W6YtluM s^ya elnmre afupn nnn Inlry:elart.^NInMYmkAmYe...... kJ mVmaxmya rtypnv JRepn° GmRWhrn An' r • NWmeNh n Wnerluvb Wrunrrnbmhr NpFvrmXuy\nlXll solo ayeAm YUWIYdy YmxrrpMM1YlAtmm�n .9 J{nY4nnWudMu,bummYk Nt+{q • X°nd YnYNeaN.wmu1 y_ JNrn,Yvmw°YAnnrlm YrvPJeln Wet) JrynnY¢ybMnmeWwAm m:v:E Jbrn Ynna KYUY pJnLByrtYn,m.4.4 JC:bemdwuvmY4YdvdueNm4m:Av/ .RTeynnnamOl mnrYMeMypnYi 1101J bdNk{.N4uutuMnnM ^•^IYJmNIYN.bd,m.[.wWelmnwnYl tY rll..lv.r WI mgmry nTw.mro.511U11 n.T^NWn :mnh{. N•Yw..rnM.t•tnn.vpNNnnmN^.• Anfbrnp/.OhadEnegneYlmin.\VmNn !bran N.NMpmemmdNNvmet MM1P.4nMYm rbn Gu¢(agr)F11.l1eLIMNanI. p,:::IYEmbnnWlNmLrBFiYmnprYYnrMd•F rtuWmrnm Y:PW, Ja..r m..n1•N,.rd,k.Naa WNrkuwlm I Jbmewwb Jun rn¢tyndW lm ram Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $25,000 per day! t � r Op ln nn'• � 4 � � Ce3 •U�A�;i c 7� ,✓ iJ [�s` N Ns IN 41 11, q= � 1 ''lam � � h Fijy� "� �, '.a: rya. `\. � ^ ♦ s i.. �w � ���' ,t *jf "ir � i ' • "ram m..,. �. t*' 17 M 4 14 151, Nr;� • �� j„F �4• Q .I .� ct l \f•Y �,yr^�1,. L !y: \ r..� t fir' S �� (�� �� .: 'p iA I ISy v CU���Vh� �- try �°�d,c .`.�y ti. � ♦ ``^ � .'sue- 1�f��U� x' ♦ IAN F f b * FyT �S EY� i) 4f`' , �,_ � „, /, �' ,t.';: ',� � '�" V,.f L ��. ,�� � re •�' � r �'i, :`"�� P�f;/'-�� ^� 'f •`/ �' .¢: 'e• �J" .✓.tu'e t;' �i.'^ 'a��.,.F.:vii. "�` nk..�.: �.i-'.. Y