The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1301 Skyview Drive - Staff Report��CITY,� City of Burlingame BURLINGAME Planning Department (650) 558-7250 o^ a H�Tm �w¢O. Memorandum To: 1320 Skyview Drive Address File From: Subject: Date: CC: �-� `- '-�� -� a"- ' �. � . � � 5, 2003, t 2003. The for design � Drive. On special iO3. I c d�a�lette�r request a Wong, On Apri122, 2002, the Planning Commission granted a on � eas extension f the design review and special permit applicarion for a first and second story addirion at this sit�e. With a one year extension, a building pemut must be issued prior to June 18, 2003. Therefore, if a building pernvt is not issued by June 18, 2003, the applicant will be required to submit new application forms, fees and plans. The project will be reviewed under current code standazds. on3 extension to-' pl� second story�� at cuss `his 7eq a s Mr. Wong understood that the zoning code only allow one extension of a Planning approval. �-- � _'= .- � - =-w _ ;; - - _ ,,,,, ::� � '`�`�.,.�:, . t; _ � :� �..ri -�a:,. � ��r.' _ �E _ �w"�'' : ��; , "� , . ;; � �. ,, ., � ,� ,� � �� -. . � �-.� ;�� : - - < �"� ` _- , — - -- - - _--�■ -- — — - _ - - r;� � .� � =; City of Burlingame Design Review and Special Permit Address: 1301 Skyview Drive Item No. 8b Regular Action Item Meeting Date: October 26, 2015 Request: Application for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garage for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling and enlarging the existing attached garage. Applicant and Property Owner: Candice Williams Designer: Gregorin Engineering & Design General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 027-201-300 Lot Area: 8,765 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not resuit in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Project Description: The subject property is located in a cul-de-sac at the southern end of Skyview Drive; the adjacent property to the south is in San Mateo County. The existing single-story house with an attached one-car garage contains 2,026 SF of floor area and has three bedrooms. The applicant is proposing a first floor addition along the front, left side and rear of the house, which would increase the total floor area to 3,480 SF (0.40 FAR), where 3,905 SF (0.44 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The project is 425 SF below the maximum allowable floor area. With this application, the number of bedrooms will increase from three to four. Two off-street parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required for this project. Due to the location of the existing water heater, the existing attached garage is considered to be a one-car garage (16' wide x 19'-6" clear interior dimensions) and will be retained. There is one uncovered parking space (9' x 20') provided in the driveway. Therefore, the project complies with off-street parking requirements. The proposed project includes enlarging the existing attached garage to accommodate one additional covered parking space (13' wide x 20'-4" deep clear interior dimensions). The new attached garage will be set back 2'-3" from the existing garage and complies with the required attached garage setback of 25'-0" (30'-4" proposed). Itwill contain a single-wide wood door to match the door on the existing garage. Applications for Design Review and Special Permit are required to enlarge the existing attached garage. The applicant is requesting the following applications: • Design Review and Special Permit to enlarge an existing attached garage (Code Sections 25.57.010 (a) (6) and 25.26.035 (a)). This space intentionally left blank. Design Review and Special Permit 1301 Skyview Drive 1301 Skyview Drive Lot Area: 8,765 SF Plans date stam ed: Se tember 25, 2015 EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front (house): 20'-3" 20'-3" 15'-10" (block average) (a#ached garage): 19'-0" 30'-4" 25'-0" -- --- — ------------ Side (/eft): 24'-0" 7'-4" 7'-0" (right): 3'-9" 7'-1" 7'_0" Rear: 31'-6" 15'-6" 15'-0" Lof Coverage: 2117 SF 3505 SF 3506 SF 24.1 % 39.9% 40% -------------.....---- ............._....------------------------ FAR: 2026 SF 3480 SF 3905 SF' 0.23 FAR 0.40 FAR 0.44 FAR - -- -------------....._..........--........__....._...----......_ .....................__......__...._....................._..----- # of bedrooms: 3 4 --- — ------- ---------------------- Off-Sfreet Parking: 1 covered 2 covered 1 covered (16'-0" x 19'-6" clear) (16'-7" x 19'-6" clear & (9' x 18' for existing) 1 uncovered 13' x 20'-4" clear) 1 uncovered (9' x 20') 1 uncovered (9' x 18' for existing) (9' x 20') Building Heighf: 18'-9" 17'-3" 30'-0" DHEnvelope: complies complies C.S.25.26.075 ' (0.32 x 8765 SF) + 1100 SF = 3905 SF (0.44 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Building, Parks, Engineering, Fire and Stormwater Divisions. Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission design review study meeting on October 13, 2015, the Commission discussed the project and voted to place this item on the regular action calendar, recommending that the applicant consider using aluminum clad wood windows instead of vinyl windows (see attached October 13, 2015, Planning Commission Minutes). In her response letter dated October 20, 2015, the applicant notes that she has chosen to use aluminum clad wood windows and doors for the project as suggested by the Planning Commission. The applicant revised the notes on the previously submitted plans, date stamped September 25, 2015. A condition of approval was added regarding the windows and exterior doors. There are no changes proposed to the window style. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 2 Design Review and Special Permit 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. InterFace of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 1301 Skyview Drive Required Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d): (a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood; (b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood; (c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city; and (d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal that is proposed is appropriate. Suggested Findings for Special Permit (Attached Garage): That the proposed single-car garage addition complies with the off-street parking requirement for the project and will reduce street parking on the cul-de-sac; that the subject property is located at the end of a cul-de-sac and that the attached garage addition is located next to an existing attached garage; that the attached garage addition is located 30'-4" back from the front property line where 25'-0" is the minimum required; that the new attached garage addition will be set back 2'-3" from the existing garage and will contain a single-wide wood door to match the door on the existing garage; thatthe attached garage addition is integrated into the architecture of the house by way of a sloping roof; forthese reasons the project may be found to be compatible with the special permit criteria listed above. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affrmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 25, 2015, sheets A1 through A8; 2. that all newwindows and exterior doors, with the exception of the front entry doorwhich is to be solid wood, shall be wood with aluminum cladding; the new garage door shall be wood and shall match the design of the existing garage door to remain; 3. that any changes to building materials, exteriorfinishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 3 Design Review and Special Permit 1301 Skyview Drive 5. thatthe conditions ofthe Building Division's September25, 2015 and September4, 2015 memos, the Parks Division's September 10, 2015 memo, the Engineering Division's September 28, 2015 and September 2, 2015 memos, the Fire Division's September 10, 2015 memo and the Stormwater Division's September 3, 2015 memo shall be met; 6. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 8. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Ruben Hurin Senior Planner c. Candice Williams, applicant and property owner Gregorin Engineering & Design, project engineer Frank Pecavar, project contractor Design Review and Special Permit Attachments: October 13, 2015 Planning Commission Minutes ApplicanYs Response Letter, dated October 20, 2015 Application to the Planning Commission Special Permit Application Photographs of Neighborhood Staff Comments Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 16, 2015 Aerial Photo 1301 Skyview Drive 5 a�, C I TY 0� "�' : r 1 ,1 �, r i �� City of Burlingame Meeting Minutes Planning Commission BURLINGAME CIN HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 Tuesday, October 13, 2075 7:00 PM Council Chambers c. 1301 Skyview Drive, zoned R-1 - Application for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garage for a frst floor addition to an existing single family dwelling and enlarging the existing attached garage (Candice Williams, applicant and property owner; Gregorin Engineering & Design, designer) (20 noticed) Staff Contact: Ruben Hurin Attachmanb: 1301 Skvview Dr - Staff Report 1301 Skvview Dr -Attachments All Commissioners had visited the property. P/anning Manager Gardiner provided an overview of fhe staff reporf. Ques6ons of sta/f.• > Is the Design Review only for the garage? (Gardiner Design Review applies to construction of a garage attached to a sing/e-family dwelling, as well as an addition having a plate height greate� than nine (9) feet above finished floor.) Chair DeMartini opened Me public hearing. Fiank Pecavar rep�asented the applicant, with pioperly owner Candice �lliams. Commission quesNons/commenfs: > Is the intent to add an additiona/ peiking bay ro park a car, a for storage? (Pecavar: Wents Bre edditional parking space.) > Is infent to park two cars in the garage or three? (Pecavar Three.) > Is there a p/an /or site drainage? There is a retaining wall, and some downspouts noted on the plan. Rainwater will flow fowards the retaining wal/ and might drain fo neighboring property. (Pecavar. Cunently working on the issue. Wall was built in 2002 and drainage was put in that is connected fo the downspouts. Trying to figure out where they are going - seems to be going down towards the wall and out towards the rear of the property.) > Why was the euca/yptus tree cut down? (Pecavar.� Large size, mess, nuisance, dange�.) > Why not match existing windows? (Pecavar.� In scope of addition only one window is remaining. Wants to match rest of neighborhood so it would be inconspicuous. Neighboring houses either have ongina/ aluminum frame windows, or newer white vinyl. Chose Milgard Sty/e Line because it is a bit thinner in the irame than a standard wide-/rame vinyl window. Is still being discussed with owne�.) Surrounding houses may not be best to match to, could instead set a leadinq example. Public comments: None. Chair DeMartini Gosed Me public hearing. City o/ Budingame Page t anneed on �a�asots Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 13, 2015 Commission discussion: > Garage addition looks odd given the unequal size of the garage doors. Looks like two attached garages. Stepping back does not make it look like it fits the building. > Design guidelines seek to minimize impact of attached garages on the street. Usually attached garages are just single-car, but this looks like a three-car garage. There are no three-car garages in the neighborhood. > No neighbor behind, below, or to the /eft so although it does not fit into the neighborhood in terms of scope and scale, it is tucked away at back of cul-de-sac and not seen. Mass and scale blend in with the house. > Can't imagine this would get approved anywhere else, but could be acceptable here. Typically Planning Commission does not encourage attached garages, and particularly three-car garages. > Ditficult to park cars at the end of cul-de-sac. If someone wants to accommodate additional parking and it is not visible it can 6e supported. > This is a neighborhood of houses with attached garages. > Tucked into comer, does not have an impact on fhe neighborhood. > This is a unique situation. !f fhis we2 approved, should not be considered an encouragement for other three-car garages. Commissioner Gum made a mofion, seconded by Commissioner Bandrapalli, to place the item on the Regular Action Ca�endar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5- DeMartini, Gum, Terrones, Gaul, and Bandrapalli Nay: 2- Loftis, and Sargent Clfy of Bullingame Page 2 Printed on 10H4/2015 Candice Williams 1301 Skyview Dr. Burlingame Ca. October,l9 2015 ! � � - r. �' � ,o �„� �. City of Burlingame Planning Commission All Commissioners � ii' I i Q 2015 :!f � Ur isURLINGHPAF ,_.L` PL:A�,INING DI`! COITIITI1SS10R@!S, I at 1301 Skyview Dr. have taken seriously into consideration the Commission's request that the windows on my proposed project be changed from Vinyl windows to another type. I am proposing to change ALL windows to Wood Frame, Aluminum Clad in type. I further hope that this change will meet with the Commission's approval. Thank You, Candice Williams 6V�ME � COMMUNITY DEVEIOPMENT DEPARTMENT • SO1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME� CA 940'IO p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: �Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit �' Special Permit ❑ PROJECT ADDRESS: �� "�� l�l/, '—� APPLICANT 'n/ Name: �.4 N� /G � VV !��/H� �Y7 S Address: � �r ,5,� Jl ///E !�// L72. City/State/Zip: /3 ,e/�.�.c� �E 9yo/� Phone: �/5-60/-/U�f�/ E-mail: �r7l� y�/Z � C o�,f�G'�5T' Parcel #: 027- 201- 3ov Zoning / Other: PROPERTY OWNER Name: CA�v� /c E �/iii /�i�J+i.0 S Address: /3o/S,LJI/�//6/�j �7,Q City/State/Zip: ,(3 �e/%� 9�lD/d Phone: %�S 60� -/OY�! E-mail: ��`/'�/2�Cow�'sJ�/�v� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: �i ,E� Go,e/iv �iv�, -r—,d cS'lGN Address: �y�9 Fo,e-f l�f/oRfy N/a4 �! City/State/Zip: S'stcQ,4i,r�En�f6 C�/ �rS BZ7 Phone: _ 9'/vl - 362 —3z3a � • .- . Burlingame Business License #: � O S/(� �EC�'; . ��:�- SEP - ; 2015 CITY OF BURL,!NGAME CDD-PLANNING DIV. Authorization to Reproduce Proiect Plans: I hereby grent the City of Burlingame the aut or' to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted with this application on the City's website as part Planning approval process and waive any claims against the City arising out of or related to such action. (Initials of ArchitecUDesigner) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �j�'j"$i�+T/oN O� Z/�G�,� lJ�L/�iCR�ruS �-r`/ f�/��/TDiy' ,i� �fils� ' � AFFIDAVITISIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and corcect to the best of my knowledge and belief. . ' ' AppiicanYs signature:�� ,� L�� Q,�,�� Date: `t --I _ � l �� I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Q �� /� Property owner's signature��U W Date• �' �� '� Datesubmitted:_ �I �I !� S: �HANDOUT SI PC Appllcadon.dx This Space for CDD Staff Use Only � Project Description: fippl;�c.-�;a., -�r �cS� ��e� a..d Sp..ec;c+.l a�-�.�►� d i�.,- � -� �.: � l y � 5'I�U t � S �� Lwc�finS _ � � r M �-� r I I L add �'rj��l DSR deposit/handling fee paid by: Ca� J; c� ��k��a�'a _ 1u�U�a�{��S �3v� Sic� v� tw Ar ��rL G�4 �`b�o Abbreviation DHE DSR E N SFD SP Term Conditional Use Permit Declining Height Envel� Desiqn Review New Single Family Dwelli Seecial Permit p Z�-�,o(� 3Dfl Cily of BuAingame • Community Development Departrnent • 501 Primrose Road • P(850) 558-7250 • F(650) 6963780 • www.burlinaame.om T a � �� \� — CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explain why the blend of mass, sca/e and dominantstructural characteristics of the new construction oraddition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. S EE �-�,-� G�� 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood. 3. 4. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopfed by the city (C.S. 25.57)9 Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary and is consisfent with the city's reforestation requirements. What mitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why fhis mitigation is appropriate. Rev. 072008 � See over for explanation of above questions. SPECIAL.PERMIT.APP.FORM City of Budingame • Community Devebpmanl Department • 501 Pdmrose Road • P(650) 55&7250 • F(650) 696-3790 •�ww.budinaame.ora 1. Explain why the blend of mass, sca/e and dominanf structural characteristics of fhe new construction or addition are consistent wifh the existing sfrucfure's design and with the existing street and neighborhood. How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties7 If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighbori�g properties. Think about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlighVshade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include those to the right, left, rear and across the street. How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. 2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and e/evations of the proposed newstructure oraddition are consisfent with the existing sfructure, streef and neighborhood. How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood. How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. If you don't feei the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. 3. How will fhe proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city? Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these guidelines? 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 4. Explain how fhe removal of any frees /ocated within the footprint ofanynew strucfure or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforesfation requirements. What mifigation is proposed for the removal of any frees� Explain why this mitigation is appropriate. Will any trees be removed as a result of this proposai? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If no trees are to be removed, say so. _ GREGOR€N �NGINEEF; NG & DES GN 4 . �.- _. ....> i.� ':Y ... _. . . ��r.r -� 20�� 9469 FORT WORTH WAY SACRAMENTO, CA 95627 �"�'`�� r'�-��n'��'r Date: 09-30-15 Pri•9163623230 e-Mni�areqorinCa)sbcqlobalnet ��r� �\� Job WILL01 CITY OF BURLINGAME SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION Description of Design Aspects of 1301 Skvview Drive Permit # B 15-0143 Prepared for. Candice Williams, Owner Prepared by: Frank L. Gregorin, P.E., Engineer of Record and Designer. 1. How the oroaosed proiect is consistent with the existina street and nei¢hborhood The proposed project is a one-story addition to an existing one-story ranch style house that will not affect neighboring properties or strucmres on those properties. lt will blend in appropriately with the existi��g house and neighborhood. The addition is designed as an extension of the house towazds the end of the cul-de-sac and the rear of the property and does not disrupt the lineaz flow characteristic of the one- story houses on the same side of the sveet. The mass and bulk of the proposed project as viewed from the street is not imposing. It has less visual impact from a mass and bulk aspect than the two-story house across the stree[. No houses exist to the reaz or direcdy to the left of the subject propeRy. To the left in the southwest direction is the end of the cul-de-sac facing the rear of the adjacent property on a different street and approximately 14' lower in elevation. Since the subject property is only one story and mainly faces southwest, the addition would not cast imposing shadows on the adjacent properties. The rear of the subject property and che houses to the right face a protected watershed uea. The view of Ihis feature from these properties will not be affected by the proposed addition. 2. Character of the aroaosed addition The addition was designed to match the existing house and stay true to the materials and the 4:12 sloped gable and hips roofs consistent with the chazacteristics of the houses in the neighborhood. Thus the aesthetics of the addition (roof lines, fa�ade, exterior finish materials and elevations) are consistent with the general ranch style of the existing neighboring houses. No unusual, unique or dominant azchitectural or structural features aze being proposed. lof2 -_- � GREGOReN - �NGINEER NG & DE� GN 9469 FORT WORTH WAY SACRAMENTO, CA 95627 Date: 09-30-15 PH� 916 362 3230 E-MAIL� QfBQOflfl�a SbCdlOb81 f1Bt Job: W ILL01 The chazacter of the neighborhood will not change since this is a simple strait forward one-story addition ro a one-story house at the end of a cul-de-sac. The size of the addition would be compatible with the [wo-story house across the street and would blend in with the mass and bulk characteristic at the end of the street as it already exists. The garage addition was also deliberately set back from the existing gazage front to give the roof some architectural vaziation and to give a sense of being tucked away as to not abrupUy terminate the lineaz character of the houses in the neighborhood. 3. Meetine the desien ¢uidelines adopted bv the Burlineame Citv Council. 1. The project matches the architectural style of the existing house, which is consistent with the existing chazac[er of Ihe neighborhood. 2. The addition of an attached one-car garage would not conflict with the two-garage style of the other houses on the street since itis at the end of the cul-de-sac and does not impose on adjacent properties. The addition of the garage would also essentially provide for additional street pazking availability for the adjacent ueighbors. 3. The architectural style matches the existing ranch style of the existing house and of the houses in the neighborhood. The mass and bulk of the addition does not impose on the neighborhood since only the garage is visible from the street. Being that the property is at the end of a cul-de-sac the proposed extension of the house is a more desirable design solution as compared to a more massive and bulky two- story option, which would have imposed a greater impact on adjacent houses. A greater cost and design effort was performed to accommodate a less imposing one story s[ructure. 4. T6is one story design also provides a better interface with adjacent properties. It is unobtrusive and will continue to blend with the one-story houses along the street to the right of the project. It will also interface with the two-story house across the street in terms of their mass and bulk being more consistent with each other. 5. No changes to the landscaping aze proposed other than the addition of the three trees, which will add to the aesthetics of the streetscape. 4. No trees will be removed as a result of this proposal. 2of2 1319 SKYVIEW DR. ; _:_ _ :i 1301 SKYVIEW DRIVE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA PROJECT LOCATION GREGOR�N NGINEER6NG & DES�GN STRUCTURAL E�GINEERING RESIDENTIAOCOMMERCIAL OfzSIGN 9469 FORT WORYH WAY SACRAMENTO, CA 85827 916.362.3230 916.599.5874 (Cel.) gregori n@sbcgl obal. net Enctineer of Record & Desianer Frank L. Gregorin, P.E. CA License No. C 52315 � ADDITION - _. ' 1301 SKYVIEW DRIVE BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA OWNER: CANDICE WILLIAMS APN 027-201-300 , PERMIT NUMBER: 615-0143 1305 SKYVIEW DRIVE 1309 SKYVIEW DRIVE 1315 SKYVIEW DRIVE �EC�'>.' ;"�� STREETSCAPE SEP -1 ��,� CITY OF BURLI^:GAP:4E CDD-PLANNING DIV, DATE: 08-17-15 Project Comments Date: To: From September 25, 2015 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 0 Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garage for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1301 Skyview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-201-300 Staff Review: No further comments. All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 9-4-2015 will apply to this project. Reviewed Project Comments Date: August 31, 2015 To: 0 Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garage for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1301 Skyview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-201-300 Staff Review: September 7, 2015 �n the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, and 2013 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1889. Note: If the Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2016 then this project must comply with the 2016 California Building Codes. � As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to January 1,1994. Details can be found at htt�//www leginfo ca.gov/ u�b/09-10/bill/sen/sb 0401- 0450/sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered html. Revise the plans to show compliance with this requirement. 3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2013 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24/2013standards/ for publications and details. �411 Provide two completed copies of the attached Mandatory Measures with the �J submittal of your plans for Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans on which each Measure can be found. 5) lace the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) 7) �� Construction hours are limited to work in the public right of way must now be bn the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to perForming the work. Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site � arking. �9) rovide existing and proposed elevations. This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any twelve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This building must comply with the 2013 California Building Code for new structures. BMC 18.07.020 Note: Any revisions to the plans approved by the Building Division must be submitted to, and approved by, the Building Division priorto the implementation of any work not speci�cally shown on the plans. Significant delays can occur if changes made in the field, without City approval, necessitate further review by City departments or the Planning Commission. Inspections cannot be scheduled and will not be performed for work that is not shown on the Approved plans. 11)Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 12)Provide a complete demolition plan that includes a legend and indicates existing walls and features to remain, existing walls and features to be demolished, and new walls and features. NOTE: A condition of this project approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work can begin (including the removal of an building components), until a Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed. 13 how the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed �roperty lines ooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Rooms that could be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. On the elevation drawinas specify the location and the net c/ear opening height and width of all required egress windows. 2013 California Residential Code (CRC) §R310. �Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 16)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 17)Provide § 1009. 18)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 2013 CBC lighting at all exterior landings. NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically address items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 13, 14, and 15 must be re-submitted before this project can move forward for Planning Commission action. The written response must include clear direction reqardinq where the reauested information can be found on the alans. Reviewed Project Comments Date: To: From: August 31, 2015 � Engineering Division (650) 55�7230 � Building Division (sso) ssa-�2so X Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attomey (650J 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garage for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1301 Skyview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-201-300 Staff Review: September 7, 2015 /� 1.) Rehabilitated landscape must comply with the Water Conservation in v Landscape Ordinance (attached) Irrigation plan due for Building Permit. �2. Identify species of the 3 new landscape trees. Reviewed by: BD Date: 9/10H 5 Project Comments Date: September 25, 2015 To: X Engineering Division � Fire Division (650J 558-7230 (650) 558-7600 � Building Division � Stormwater Division (650) 558-7260 (650) 342-3727 � Parks Division � City Attorney (650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204 From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garage for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1301 Skyview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-201-300 Staff Review: 1. Please be aware that no additional storm runoff is allowed from the post construction site. During the building permit stage, a design must be implemented to retain the additional storm runoff on site. Reviewed by: M. Quan Date: 9/28/15 Project Comments Date: August 31, 2015 To: X Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garage for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1301 Skyview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-201-300 Staff Review: September 7, 2015 1. A property boundary survey shall be performed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topogrephical features and utilities. Survey needs to be stamped and signed by a licensed engineer/land surveyor. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) � Please provide a site plan showing the existing hardscape/softscape on the property. 3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 4. Sewer eackwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to the issuance of Building Permit. Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non- City Holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. 5. 6. The sanitary sewer lateral (building sewer) shall be tested per ordinance code chapter 15.12. Testing information is available at the Building department counter. A Sewer Lateral Test encroachment permit is required. Reviewed by: M. Quan Date: 912115 Project Co ts Date: To: From August 31, 2015 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 0 Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 X Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garage for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1301 Skyview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-201-300 Staff Review: September 7, 2015 No comments at this time. Note: Fire sprinkler installation requirements already noted on plan. Reviewed by: Christine Reed ��i�'� Date: 9-10-15 Project Comments Date August 31, 2015 To: � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 � Building Division (650) 558-7260 � Parks Division (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff 0 Fire Division (650) 558-7600 X Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Subject: Request for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garage for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling at 1301 Skyview Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-201-300 Staff Review: September 7, 2015 Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the city's stormwater NPDES permit to prevent construction activity stormwater pollution. Project proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction, including demolition. When submitting plans for a building permit, please include a list of construction BMPs as project notes, preferably, on a separate full size (2'x 3' or larger), plan sheet. A downloadable electronic file is available at: http://www.flowstobay. org/Construction Please contact Kiley Kinnon, NPDES Stormwater Coordinator, for assistance at (650) 342-3727 Reviewed by: KJK Date: 09103115 SAN MATE' o�~,oE Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) Water Poliution Construction projects are required to implement the stormwater best management practices (BMP) on this page, PC@Y@f1t1011 PI'Ogl'dfll as t}tey apply to your project, all year ]ong. Gean Water. HaalNy [omm�niry. Mahrials & R'ash Maoagement \�' ; r r ,; � Y �� , r � rn' �y�,� +� .. ,y''u s 41 � xumee.�mmwm�w ❑ Bam utl mw�we4WW afoN.d'N wqMvonrnn(m�vaaml �aN mp>irnnin h fvicei w Vuo� otlir J. b�iny cvW wiAm 14d�n O Uwlbutlae'ewuuc)rs�inedwacMduu.animl. HM�dov� AlaluhY O I�bd il16mEnu mmie 4 M�dou� muo (mrA n f�ti�.aNem.mlwxfwlo0.mtlm�if lin avNnavYM1tJly.wuvrv,mle W fvluvlrt4��lbo� O$IVv�PYNPum�WNh �od fNLC m w]IC4pli1(Mhi¢n. Me v.wAa�.m,�mm mw�mmc ma ww wau r ue aa or �c...mY m. m u�iee xa.ma�rQ..M� nic u racm � FoYwmuidr.lual�Wwilaa �mrvwidu fvlrm�Wv mmisl�mE 6ewelW W wm mae Juoucetury. Oorot NV� ��^YEm�MenNo ulas�9n�ii15� E9 M1oun. o,�.ma, r«.�..p,;n. me�� or on n.wmm rma wAn.nue.em,m O Cmvwv�SN��mdpm�vameF wi�A �qn4NcraEN �T wmk E9 aetl MVM6 �� rteniti ocu s..me�omi.o,mw.nr�ryraw,�smamm.m meAeyRmOnafl4d NeRboatlmreidwpmqWe wiuvwbn tlx 0 ��Pu�ebkloi4lcaivp�clLLmGeyantll(o- o n� erw �..m.eeaen.wwwy, nrm�.,a�,,,e am mu u� a� �rl�e f� u apuc �wcbw �rcewo � m�m W i rveoC YP bmd. Pk^. w.) 0 Ui�pme M�ipW �aNeeifim pedvR Wimvt fel.m411�aetl clemingOuW uhmNqu�rm�q Cm��(uvhn Hntr�em mtl Pulmtlo- o rmnwn.a�mmwr<u.�w'�+��oi..�auwm�w mmGuubn u� eE Stib P svRiim II� epNpl aptlm OYd ��e� B�ev Om spe mE uo-8ng oRriR ❑ Sx¢Va�MNwm�1Wl�mMiotrll'ud`ecmv adimml wurs m pswa BiMv o-sk IK Nwsr Eaw do�m meev umwov�a�ms Equipment Management & Spill Coutrol Mtlnim.mcmEPVWn6 � a nao�..wcaaev�wmw=n�er.u.,r �eAelv md R�N"� P�Y e! mragn O YafwvmWm�Ielm�ew.�ery4lv�4m0�edFY mEyoqnv�mAivgoP�nc ❑ U�e��eor�e8lckw�wmwemvppedmp ��c..k m. se�a.m ...r r� m�o� a.m, W a�eraAip pe GgwweQh wrollm AoW. Ilmcba6rymoCLuW m hm�dom�rsXe ❑ IF�rBi'k>R^�mltkmw6eopted�eoml�4 ebn x'vhwuera�' G�nLmuW w We1M11 m aDenriort�vYo-romnuble�� 4�bm �m+.o.,mr«�..�. � 0.ml�kmM�kkvqWpma[mdkvvp6 R4 ml�mb. hpma�. Les'Je^om[ %mOmmt qc somr2.�„ac�a � O MaP4��Pme1[AhNP.��e�M1a�+.Ww) nti1LIC tl IbC mupQ'en y'b LL d1 tiou, o tim +.wke.idarvM�=nr qomu�t>w Rw��.v�Wr. u»ennam.mmefim dilrzposwmde a a��wrwaw�w„�ammy.mempewor rim�^Pmwh4qopuh. O WodM1oadmmw� aeEee9WbMeNdled � M' clmeV mtl6od� Gbmhml mie'mY. u iwn.wd/anwl ❑ s�cnun��kamrm.aa.tmm�u�o-h.00ua y m mm mm m*r w1u wm. o Lm� Wu. O am�wro�o-ein.�MWeWnma V��I4q�6aM1�01d10LL � P�a�dpiEm�4vL�boWie JY.Yww�ep'veE b( Yn b rtpa[ tl�ipifimp idymc u(ymdeu n�mi�4icMb�aLlb�eW��M� q DW 911 m m. iw �,��,�,,,,,�eo. n au m. Omeaia100x aCEm mgo�l $y��y µy�ya � �eo� efznm p�e�} StOri71 C�T'2111 Earthxork& Paving/AyphaltWork Contamina[ed sotls - i .._ ' ` ; ,;,! � �.....`.�� ,.i � , -�.] - �:•.1 :: �.a �� a . . � s�onm Caead O 5 Jirddce�W eWw�timnvhlv ��'. � Sub'tim W d'aotledva5 innell �vE m�'mmh�mpwuyavdmwmek( L wmowmdneac«uo�eeev �mu'v) mN yewua u emb�'vld. OSxEo-plm�n�emmlwwdm mmml m sbpu a ntm mvwuelon 6 odMmM6WY W�G SeLnmf Cmhel a qema.mimen:;,ucq�,um�N¢yu, eMNyuGmuwaW nWAWae 9MC�.arLUNK�A0. GbvmW. �aan o vk..m.mmwe�mWwa�e �mwume.ewda.x�..z.� .omm..�e v nurml4 di� �a.v.> Teeuh�. � KxOe.mrtledwilm�Maf¢n#ee(1 nill W aJ4e1 ale demal ❑ T�avfv'mryed mMo�mduep naL an We zllt mt w Ihe mcl. 0 GI�Ie1501b ❑ vmr or�n�r w,�a�an�,.2 =e.n.a.`ar �rimee mou�l � ReV ovN NLb Qufq�' Cmeol eorta: • U�ml pl avodmon�, diuoln�icM1 aNm. • AlsCwtlmJvO `md wtr. � AbuW xdw'YY • BrYdbu�el4J�b4 V uvA O AmWprmgatlmlweNOLID�ve� wuWa,awM1mNo6f be(erc Gv1 p�v�� nll brt i'me ro ae � CmvuwmbW Mlds�vEmuMle •+� av��s.d e� u.x � � awr v+lla�.vla. O Cdlen�nErtry'eleaePpW�W9 ar W^� etcv9 �Mme P��el a m W. Du NQI' axeep w mA i� Inb rynuc O pommnvco-pnvAdoxnlmh �i�aaa.�.w.a�eac 5�^��L 8 AfpM1YUCmnCc Ame�Y ❑ CmV�bbamvarMM.-rletlerm a,�w+.>nm�„m.a �eiu> r.�. wrs e.ie ww rxwv o.m..0 uav m lvv+�r wi wm..wm aan �. a sho,*lemmn.a.�.�:umo,.�..wai dmlmdd%WmohOaalemin arvo x YnWwe fn oc bnibo mx �he mtl MexAnak d�9' (n4kh�v 4 mmW). � I(a�vutlwp� aun � nu66uidckeo il�p'vemMiMcly. be liable for fines of up to $1 Concrcte, Grout & Martar Apptication O AacmoR 6W� stlmaoemda �:m w�..m.� �m a�.�� ,.@�w.��o��. nwminu. O WssbmcmodeWmYne+Wuv�b 06�> I� � vNsaN'am. a Nec Om<ivFn6mmlM1cwEWy�^! � uw�mWiv�uu�letr�t�e uaam.aa�w=*=orss�ro 4CtlhxtlM1e�wAnilo-f rtad�ivg fw uppyM�H��S�� '�e N �enw�< i� M �o�otiuc. Dewahriog t 0 FIIa1F<b' moup JI mm tll Nmawiaame.i�.maw �warmn &cW6n! Nctl4.Di�vl�wm xebf aPdieno�rfim�vllEiumbd amc a aWuxuc rosue amDlieae. o w�x...�a�h.oe � .o�..�r me�,r.immmpeiy. �a��s.,a�=a.emcwa. mmmd6n.fiMRmuti�mun IluooWtEmW wiY.wssNmwtrap tiI�RPLM. O Mu.xa(Lwnn�wum'vutim.wtiu6 4m-0m�md qiarb�eueetdiWypeY �mmErvuv. Gnull.id W e Eepim b an.mma Mienv rcnin e a�ew4.e.m Iwn b Imvpn �wl¢ Cmwn ouul vamdrv•wmmxw�eircnwke oB6¢MWWVLWud Painling & paintRemovel z. � r�i :: Palo�(n«4ano� ' ON��bvhtarivsP+le� huoarvm,µoo-.amm Nun.araM �y�u� O For��M+Aa1Pm4pimaubru�M10 �em«�m��,��em� m�mr cnc aeoe.a u..� w�ea v��onr uuaa�..�v+mu Imcwwt uuUwri�y. Nov ppv ryim EmneN�p, O Fo.wl-wuap.iu+. WN�m�hmM1aw tlmwenl W�ebkuCcloe mW ILi�ar m mhmi b e pepo rnonivn. F�NC yd �m��,aa,a�.�au�or mWue W uim0le N4mvhvl�ery ss bmJoumne. [��ol RIM�y o a��w��.aon��i�a�w ��wveee,nr �au,�so. P�^bmnoip'vi6lmJauibun1tinn�rel b� JI*Vm� ofu Mmtlou x�ne. O P�MI tli�q W Eim f mn.A�u�Ey� M��w�oc.mm�e aeabcma t. �wepl op v wllrctrd in phslk Lmp ..em.maeuo, aor..w.t Landscape Mahrials I*�_ O Cmv6 pWy14d IeE¢�ini A��4 b tlnm{ikni ea4iwW �vM1rn ihmue �M wnmJY trm6 oaE. O Aah ovtlro�ebotloR mwuiY m w�w.. u�o. a. wR me� m.mn.� •1x+1 �]' xnaxti�e{r trm� uuE n �M� � Di�mvtiweyqlimYon ofon> aoNble �M�Yui�lxiJuidy� We�ea faimn nm c�m o- tlwin8 �a weul�r. I � � RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption has been prepared and application has been made for Desiqn Review and Special Permit for attached aaraae for a first floor addition to an existinca sin4le familv dwellina and enlarcaina the existinq attached parape at 1301 Skwiew Drive, Zoned R-1. Candice Williams, propertv owner. APN: 027-201-300; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 26, 2015, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this Commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved. 2. Said Design Review and Special Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review and Special Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th dav of October, 2015, by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit. 7301 Skyview Drive Effective November 5, 2015 Page 1 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped September 25, 2015, sheets A1 through A8; 2. that all new windows and exterior doors, with the exception of the front entry door which is to be solid wood, shall be wood with aluminum cladding; the new garage door shall be wood and shall match the design of the existing garage door to remain; 3. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 5. that the conditions of the Building Division's September 25, 2015 and September 4, 2015 memos, the Parks Division's September 10, 2015 memo, the Engineering Division's September 28, 2015 and September 2, 2015 memos, the Fire Division's September 10, 2015 memo and the Stormwater Division's September 3, 2015 memo shall be met; 6. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 7. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 8. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review and Special Permit. 7301 Skyview Drive Effective November 5, 2015 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �BURLINGAME, CA 94010 °�, PH:(650)558-7250 � FAX:(650)6963790 www.burlingame.org Site: 1301 SKYVIEW DRIVE The City of Burlingame Plonning (ommission announces the following public hearing on MONDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2015 at 7:00 P.M. in ihe (ity Holl Council [hambers, 501 Primrose Rood, Burlingame, CA: ApplicaTion for Design Review and Special Permit for attached garoge for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling and enlorging the existing attached garage at 1301 SKYVIEW DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 021-201-300 Mailed: Octoher 16, 2015 (Please refer to ofher side) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Citv of Burlingame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side) � ,' � - , , � - , .. 1'. �1 n � a s ` ! "`; ! c,t�� . � �C�,a - d� m �� ; �a � ,' � ,. - �e, � _. £ \ J Oa f� . / � �.' byfL �� . J ti � ''\�,�P �. q6rL�- ' . . � ti�� o � y�, (#. . � ,,�\ \ \ .-,. , `� . , � ,-� �5'� � �Y ,. � i � � ��\, . - �� ' y`P�. . . ,� . .'/ . , . ... pO , ' . -/ �, ,d f� . . v ` O i� . . � r� � Oo . � � . ,I.` . . ��4JSi- /� , P . S �'�, ! � ' �. ✓�. , . ,>>` , � �. ��`/ .. o+A � J . ` . � ` '�, �� . [' [ / . SO e . � � d" ' ♦ .,� . �� . ; e` � � � ' . O �O_a \\ � . 8 �` vp. _ s e! � � \ •\., �., g e` �'y`�F�� S �p� / �� . � � " K+ � c,`F' ! i —_ .. . ca [ � f'L ..� � . ' � . 9 �£! . i� -- '-/ P � �SC gb L: 9bL,'/ J � f ' � 1: � �� £ Sar�y £ � . rt , � , .' sG••C�`- � j% / s �J ' / ` / _ ,; `� j ' f- -. _ -., � �z �_.