The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1740 Sequoia Avenue - Staff ReportCITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Unapproved Mlnutes October 14, 2008 VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS 4. 118 STANLEY ROAD, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR A NEW DETACHED GARAGE (DANIEL AND SUSAN SCHOENTHALER, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA Reference s �r�eport Meeker pres 'nted the r consideration. Chair Cauclii opened tJ�'e public ��: �kry,,.., �� i•�` Michael Kaindl, JD & Associates, 875 Mahler Road; Comm�,�i„ty Development Director n.,(10) con`&it�io'G�S,were suggested for �rq, �4 ^' �4� the applicant. • Due to the grading and keeping the garage slab at the level of the driveway, the doors must swing in ��°� unless fur��er grading i required; also owners prefers dor�rs to swing in due to narrow passage betwe,� f�ouse and ga ge. �" , , ,,�; , ,.�•;. �'�;�' • Own@F I�as a valuable �ehicl� that`is a collect�s item; f her prot�tion`'wikhin the�a�ag • Tre,� is protected; not be�n e�noved. �� r. • Pr�fers garage to be two��t�ndem garage. '`�� ;'' ' �i.�.- ,:. �^+ , Commiss�n comments: � �� • Asked if the garage door will hit the vehicle when parked in the garage (Kaindl - is a problem to be monitored by the property owner); questioned whether the structure is really a garage. • Clarified that screened area will be installed past the first car to protect the collector car and keep children from getting to the car. • Discussed grade difference and how it affects the swing of the door (Kaindl - if it were to swing out, would need to build a stoop). Public comments: Tom Bellucci, 114 Stanley Road; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; and Dan Schoenthaler, 1333 Bernal Avenue spoke: there are two trees that are close to his yard in the back-yard; they have grown significantly in the past 30-years and create a lot of damage to his yard. Three large roots enter his yard and are disturbing his fruit trees. Noted that cutting the roots will damage and weaken the tree, discouraged him from doing so; work with neighbor. Indicated that he will be moving back to Stanley property; purpose to store 1932 deuce coupe; is a narrower vehicle than current vehicles. Steve Porter looked at tree with him; is a healthy and beautiful tree; can't move the garage any further back due to tree. W ill work with neighbor on the limbs and roots of the tree. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Vistica moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped October 1, 2008, sheets G-1, G-2 and Boundary and Topographic Survey and that any changes to footprint or floor area of the accessory structure shall require an amendment to this permit; 2. that the waste line to the accessory structure shall be no larger than two inches; !� . • �;. MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNER U�l�o, —a.-•-- P.C. 1/14/91 Item # i SUBJECT: VARIANCE TO LOT COVERAGE FOR A SECOND FLOOR ADDI- TION TO ONE UNIT OF A DUPLEX AT 1740 SEQUOIA AVE., ZONED R-2. Applicant.and property owner, Mr. & Mrs. Sam Dibella, and Giorgio M. Zigliotto, designer are requesting a variance to lot coverage for 44.25� where the maximum allowed is 40� (C.S. 25.66.010) for an existing attached duplex which is building a second story addition to the rear unit, at 1740 Sequoia Ave., zoned R-2. The existing lot coverage is non-conforming, and the addition of a second story is considered an expansion, so a lot coverage variance is required. The existing one story duplex is two attached units with 1504.25 SF in the front rental unit and 1896.75 SF in the rear property owners' unit, for a total of 1460 SF of living area and 462 SF of garage; the new second story addition will add 867 SF of living area for a total of 2789 SF. The remodelled addition on the rear unit will have three bedrooms and three baths plus sewing/TV room. All other zoning codes have been met. Staff Review City staff have reviewed this application and had no further comments. A�nlicant�s Letter The applicant and property owners note in their variance applica- tion and letter of December 4, 1990 that the owners have lived at this property for 32 years, since 1958 when the duplex was constructed. They were never aware at the time that the existing structure exceeded the lot coverage requirements by 4� and feel this technicality threatens the realization of their retirement plans. They note that the new addition does not increase the existing lot coverage because it would sit on top of the first floor's footprint which would not change. The addition will be lower than the maximum height allowed and fits within the declining height envelope. The new addition will match the vernacular of the surrounding two and three story structures in mass, scale, proportion and materials; and will not invade the privacy of the neighbors nor impact their views or solar rights. The addition will be an asset to the neighborhood both in reinforcing the existing character and property values. � Findinas for a Variance In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; (c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; (d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Plannina Commission Action The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should include findings made for the variance requested. Reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submit- ted to the Planning Department and date stamped December 13, 1990; and 2. that the project shall meet all Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements as amended by the City. Jane Gomery Planner cc:Mr. and Mrs. Sam Dibella Giorgio M. Zigliotto STAFF REVIEW OF APPLICATION TO THE PL•a1�iNINC� COMMISSION I. Proiect Address: 1740 Sequoia Ave. II. Proiect Description and Permits Reguested- VARIANCE TO LOT COVERAGE for 44.25� where the maximum allowed is 408 (C.S. 25.66.010) for an existing two unit duplex which is building a second story addition to the rear unit, at 1740 Sequoia Ave., zoned R-2. The existing lot coverage is non-conforming, and the addition of a second story is considered an expansion, so a lot coverage variance is required. The existing one story duplex is two attached units with 1504.25 SF in the front rental unit and 1896.75 SF in the rear property owners' unit, for a total of 1460 SF of living area and 462 SF of qarage; the new second story addition will add 867 SF of living area for a total of 2789 SF. The remodelled addition on the rear unit will have thXee bedrooms and three baths plus sewing/TV room. All other zoning codes have been met. III. Propertv identification: Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 025-142-160 Lot No: 17 Block No: 10 Subdivision: Mills Estate #3 Lot Size: 7,700 SF Zoning: R-2 General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential 9-20 Dwelling Units / Acre iV. Existiaa Site Conditions and Adjaceat Land Uses• Existing single story attached duplex with a three car garage. Adjacent land uses are duplexes, zoned R-2, to the north, south and east along Sequoia Ave. To the west (rear) and farther south along Sequoia are multiple residential units zoned R-3. General Plan Designation for surrounding uses are medium density residential units (9 -20 dwelling units/Acre) along Sequoia Ave, and medium high density residential (21 - 50 dwelling units/Acre) to the rear along Marco Polo Way. V. CEOA Status• Categorically exempt per CEQA Code Sec. 15303 New Construction Class 3 (a)-single family residences. VI. Project Data: Proposed New Construction: second floor bedroom, bath, sewing/TV room and loggia Existing Area: 1922 SF Total: 1504.25 SF and 1896.75 SF in rear attached unit all Proposed Percent Increase in Area: 45$ Front Setback: Side Yard Setback: Rear Yard Setback: Lot Coverage: Building Height: 30' On-Site Parking Spaces: Re uired 15' or Avg. 7'-0" 15'-0" 40$ or 2 1/2 stories 2 1/2 2 1 addition 867 SF for in front rental unit on one floor. / 2789 Total SF Proposed 15'-0" (Existing) 6'-0" (Existing) 15'-0" * 44� 25'-6" covered (Existing) uncovered (Existing) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME CITVHALL-507 PRIMROSEROAD APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION gURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 Type of Application: _Special Permit X Variance � Other Project Address_��Q�O G1�6�l�Dl�c �� 7(J(ZLIF.�—./kt�1fF p,ssessor�s Parcel Number(s) 025 � 142 - ICoO APPLICANT Name : �NL� � OI� i��4Z Address: City/State/Zip Telephone:(Work) (Home) PROPERTY OWNER xame: 1J1��, �t1�S • S�h� DI BELL� Address: � �-L�D �EbZUO ��t �-�- C3ty/State/Zip_ �UiZL�}.1��-t�l,� G�1 �(�-p�('j Telephone (Work)_�"CG� 'GJ 2.�8 ARCHITECT/ SIGNER Name :�� 1 O#2, G�D M. Z 1(� L l D T'-['D Address: d-�� - G��-1- �I��Z SA�r.( M� 1�O , G-A �l �$'f � I Telephone ( daytime.) : � _ �jG�-�j - � �j �J � ( L1 l5� (Home) �G�� — ��J(p Please indicate with an asterisk (*) who is the contact Derson for this proiect. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SMALI. S�1�0�' �dfQ•��S ��GOf�-�D �LG�Z�Af�DITIdN AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: K /� i Applicant's Signature Date Date I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I know about the proposed application, and hereby authorize the above applicant t submit this pplication. � ! �l � ��/�%/D roperty wner�s Signature Date --------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY --------------------- Filed: �? �'�=%L' Fee �(G"`'•/ Z-' Receipt ��(�i¢ S Letter(s) to applicant advising Date application accepted as co P.C. study meeting (date) � P.C. Action � PP2n�•, Appeal to Council7 Yes o Council meeting date application incomplete: '�" plete: �"' ' r" r/ P.C. public hearing (date) ��/� .'� ��r../niTinn/S Council Action aupuncaME ��.._Y.• _ � .,, E 4 N ro a v e s� o Fc -.. +� v u �o a -., s� s� m � a� � � ,� .-� C a� -.i O N x�a v v � u m ,� � m CITY OF BURLINGIIME SUPPLEMENTAL TO APPLICATION TO THE PLl1NNING COMMISSION FOR VARIANCE APPLICATIONS In order to approve an application for a variance, the Planning Commission is required to make findings (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Please answer the following questions as they apply to your property and application request to show how the findings can be made. A letter may also be submitted if you need additional space or if you wish to provide additional information for the Planning Commission to consider in their review of your application. Please write neatly in ink or type. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in the area. The Di Be11a have lived at 1740 Sequoia Ave. since 1958 when the duplex was built. Not until this day they had been a�aare that their existing lot coverage exceeds the maximum allowable by 4%. This small technicality now threatens the realization of rheir retirement nest. For this reason they request a variance be granted. � b. Explain why the application request is necessary for the N preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right c� and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship b might result from the denial of the application. � The Di Bella family has enjoyed their neiyhborhood for 32 years and loves a their neighborhood and area very much. For this reason they are noor planning to build a second story addition of 867 sq. ft.. During the desiJn process it �aas discovered that the present lot coveraye exceeds the ma�cinum allowable. This has been unchanged since the house zaas built in 1958. c. Explain why the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience. The qranting of this application will provi�e and enhance the lives of the owners who have become vernacular to this neighborhood znd caho have grown very attached to their property and which they have kept up impeccably for 32 years. The second floor addition iaill sit over the eacisting footprint of the first floor and therefor� �rill not add nec•r lot coveraqe. The addition will not endanger nor present any hazard to life safety and will blend naturally in the existing 2 and 3 story neighborhood fabric not offenc�ing anyone. d. Discuss how the proposed use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. The new proposed addition; Does not increase the existing lot covrage. It is within the declining height envelope. It's lor�er than its maximum alloiaable height. It fits and enhances the vernacular 2 and 3 story surrounding structures in mass, scale, proportion and materials. It does /3 not invade the privacy, panoramic views end solar rights of the neighbors. P.C. 1-14-91 Item #7 RL��fttr� JaN 11 1991 '° OF BURUNGqA- .�!�Nr. pr,.. 1734 Sequoia Avenue Burlingar,ie, CA 94010 January 9, 1991 Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose noad Burlingame, CA 94010 Sirs: _2^-,: Application A.P.N. 025-142-150 for a lot variance for a second story addition of the duplex at 1740 Sequoia �Avenue. To begin with the �ahole Ulock of 1700 Sequoia ?lvenue was noorly planned. The block should :iave been all duplexes, or all apartments, not both. ?dy duplex at 1734-36 Sequoia Avenue is the only duplex next door to a two story apartment building t!iat is only 6 ft. away fro±a r.�;� property. L•]e proteste3 the building of that apartnent in those days, but the builder won out. Now, to add to the r,iisfortune, 1740 on my other side which also is only 6 ft. away From r.iy property line is also planning to build a two story buildinq. 2 don't think this should be allo:ved. The 1740 duplex is one of the few if any duplexes on the block that re- quested and got the reverse plan, and because of that my property of which was built a year before was closed in by tsvo walls 6 ft. from my property lines rather than having a driveway between the tcoo houses like most all the other duplexes on the bloc:;. The main reason of which :vas obvious �or reversing the plan was to have the freedor.i o� space from tcao drivecvays and not caring about the pro- perty next door being closed in. For this reason, we strongly protest 1740 duplex from getting a variance to build another t,uo story building cvithin 6 or 7�t. of my property. T_ wou13 like to invite the comr.iittee to see for themselves just how close this building would be and what it will do to my property. '�ank ou, �k��%2�� . Arthur C. Polizzi P.C. 1/14/91 Item #7 RECEIVEf� JAN 101991 TY OF BURLINGAM •••nru(; nc� January 8, 1991 Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 ERNEST L. SHAW 152 Bonniebrook Drive Napa, CA 94558 Subject: Per your norice January 4, 1991 Variance - Second Story of Duplex, 1740 Sequoia, Burlingame, CA Dear Board Members: I have been the owner of the two, 6 unit apartments (1726/1730 Sequoia) for 23 years. I have had a great deal of pride and responsibility in keeping the buildings and surrounding areas in first class condition. The original plan of all units on Sequoia Avenue should be maintained, as one exception leads to open furdier variances for other piecemeal options. On this particular request, since the building is the second building north of my apartment, it will partially block the view of the occupants of 1730. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, ��,��<�Gu� Ernest L. Shaw ELS:jls P.G. 1-14-91 Item #7 HARRY AND GAIL COSTA ��46 QUESADA WAY BURLINGAME, CA 94011 �iiEC�IVEI� JAN 11 199} T� OF BURLINGAIr � ^^nn�r, nFr IN REGARDS TO ANY SECOND STORY AD-ONS ON EITHER SIDE OF SEQUOIA AVENUE MY WIFE AND I WOULD OBJECT TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WE BOTH FEEL THAT RESIDENTS OF BURLINGAME PURCHASE THEIR HOMES FOR THE LOCATION, VIEW AND WEATHER AMONG OTHER THINGS. PROPERTY IS EXPENSIVE AND OUR RIGHTS SHOULD BE UP-HELD. THANK YOU iG i��i/r / /�� '/'� ��_ City of Burlingame �� G�� 0�: �� , tyoFe��c�� MERCKS LOUISE MARIE 1742 QUESADA WAY BURLINGAME� CA 94010 P.C. 1-14-91 Item #7 A.P.N.: 025-141-230 NOTICE OF HEARING The CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION announces the� following public hearing on Monday, the 14th day of January 1991, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the application and plans may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Division at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. 1740 SEQUOIA AVENUE - APN: 025-142-160 APPLICATION FOR A LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO ONE UNIT OF A DUPLEX AT 1740 SEQUOIA AVENUE, ZONED R-2. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLANNER January 4, 1991 � � �(_, v "' %'�N'-� "1 w� �i ��- -�- O-�^-Q- U � � � `� �+'�-�. � �-✓"�C�._ , ��v--=-��--- � �"� , q��, '�oj�� `-`- �1 � �n,--o-y--Q-�l /u-� a'�..-�`-'�/ 1.�7�""" ` l ` __� d'v�. �'�"1/V\ e/��%`^' 1 Sry� �C�9 \ �^ , �� 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 (415) 342-8931 1/1�� —_. �. � \ ,�, '� i a J Q H � � � � ' � � 0 .�7\ 3 � �. � , O � 1]- g �sy� � � � � . :� v a � � �y � . ! 3 � `* _. . � , � Z � �. ''a� N. :� Q � � �` � �` � � J � t '� � �. � t � Z i�•_� 'k � � � �� /, "l"� ,>. , ��; � � � 4 �a�4 1�3%� �� x3' ,�s 3 �� O j1ko W , ��y � �� '� � ,��9 . 1�3�' 1��9 �1 kl ��.4'� ,�,,s i �� i ?4 3 0 r C'� i � ,� � J Q � J 0 Z o : J � � K1 MEMORANDUM DATE: �� TO: CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAL PARKS DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/ZONING SUBJECT: �� -� r�i'r v.i jwr v �'V 1 � ✓ �Ti � .ir u�vv �i . � � _.� � �..� ."_ R-� ��C iSTi r�� ,-�- �ov-F�� is ,.1�rJ- �(' 8 4"/, ' T�1 U GN . C�� ► �r�,� � fl iT�b s c s � �� SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: I I�� REVIEW BY STAFF MEETING ON MONDAY, �2 �� Thanks, Jan /Sheri �' v � �� r /� Date of Comments N6 MEMORANDUM DATEt IZ'I��/� TOa CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR — 17 FIRE MARSHAL PARKS DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICI�� LI��_ � 1�01� G��/�P-� SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ��I N �� Q� Rff.U}��,c V 1.11 17 4� S�QVU h��, � ► �XIST�t�1G �-� ro�/��f2P�/�F� �5 �.1/�rJ— �� B 4i, ' �1v G� �� rN6 �r��la . �Tia s c si1� SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGs I I� �� REVIEW BY STAFF MEETING ON MONDAY, 12 �� Thanks, Jan /Sheri _��L/ � J�Date of Comments � . �—(1�,�. '�i,rr . 1nc�,5 % u�r�e,in,�er.�' � %In�i-o � �� ob��'o� �� `c . C� tr� s�ea. i�-( MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: �2'�� CITY ENGINEER � CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE MARSHAI, PARKS DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY CITY PLANNER/ZONING TECHNICIA 1 � ��L�� 0 0 ��iCN� �iTlb� �s coNsli7�� SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: I I�� REVIEW BY STAFF MEETING ON MONDAY, (2 �� Thanks, • Jan /Sheri ?� ' % Date of Comments A f � /� ' �� ;. - • � /V / N6 A Text Correis[ing of: City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 (415) 342-8931 NOTICE OF HEARING s The ClTY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION amouues the followirg public hearing on Morday, the 16th day of Jarwery 1991, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hatt Council Chambers located at 507 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. A copy of the applicetion and plans may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Planning Division at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. 1740 SEOUOIA AVENUE - APN: 025-142-160 APPLICATION FOR A LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO ONE UNIT OF A DUPLEX AT 1740 SEOUOIA AVENUE, ZONED R•2. tf you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you mey be limited to raising only those issues you or saneone else raised at the public hearing described in the notice or in uritten correspondence delivered to the City et or prior to the public hearing. MARGARET MONROE . CITY PLANNER Jenuary 4, 1991 wes meiled to the follouing property owners: AGNONE FRANK J 8 ANTOINETTE TR BRITTON LIILLIAM J& PATRILIA A MORTARA fRED P 8 THERESA A�TRS FELDMAN 9ERNARO S WEDEL LOREN R 8 JOY M NEHRLI JEANNE C TALLERICO LEO TR ET AL MARIANI BRUNO 8 THERESA A GUANG DONG INTERNATIONAL LTD GIBBS VIRGINIA GRADY CREIGHTON 5 8 MARJORIE G DIODATf GIOVACCNINO & ELENA SNYDER BENJAMIN F 8 MARIE H TR BRINKMANN HUBERT C& JULIA A MERCKS LOUISE MARIE WSTA HARRY P JR 8 CARMEIA G LIENGER LEE 8 NADIA TR SANTOS VIRGINIA ALFARO ROBERT $ GERMAINE M SCHLESINGER BROS SCHLESINGER BROS OHLUND ERIL A JR 8 HELENE S HANSTEN MARILYN R TR ALBERA JAMES NICHOLAS TR 7220 ROBLE RD 1811 EL CAMINO REAL 50 SHERW000 CT 7743-1745 SEaU01A AVE 1741 SEDUOIA AVE 7270 MAN2ANITA DR 7733 SEOUOIA RVE 1820 CASTENADA DR 75 HIGNLAND AVE #t 1727 SE�UOIA AVE 1726 OUESADA NAY 1730 OUESADA 41Y 1734 OUESADA 4'AY 1738 OUESADA LIAY 1742 OUESADA IJAY 1746 �UESADA WY 1750 OUESADA NAY 1754 OUESADA NqY P.O. BOX 1413 2535 SUMMIT DR 2535 SUMMIT DR 1236 BELLEVUE #1 2608 HILLSIDE DR 1 FLEUR PL MILLBRAE, BURLINGAME MILLBRAE, BURLINGAME, BURLINGAME, MILLBRAE, BURLINGFME, B�RL[NGAME, BURLINGAME BURLINGAME, BURLINGAME, BURLINGAME, BURIINGAME, BURLINGAME, BURLINGAME, BURLINGAME, 9URLINGAME, BURLINGAME, BURLINGAME HILLSBOROUGH, HILLSBOROUGH, BURLINGqME, BURLfNGNME, ATHERTON CA 94030 CA 94070 CA 94030 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94030 CA 94070 CA 94010 CA 94010 LA 94010 CA 94070 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94010 CA 94027 A.P.N. : 025-141-040 A.P.N. : 025-141-050 A.P.N. : 025-147-060 A.P.N. : 025-141-070 A.P.N. : 025-141-080 A.P.N. : 025-141-090 A.P.N. : 025-141-100 A.P.N. : 025-141-770 A.P.N. : 025-141-120 A.P.N. : 025-141-130 A.P.N. : 025-141-190 A.P.N. : 025-147-200 A.P.N. : 025-141-210 A.P.N. : 025-141-220 A.P.N. : 025-741-230 A.P.N. : 025-141-240 A.P.N. : 025-141-250 A.P.N. : 025-141-260 A.P.N. : 025-141-270 A.P.N. : 025-142-010 A.P.N. : 025-742-020 A.P.N. : 025-742-030 A.P.N. : 025-142-040 A.P.N. : 025-142-050 061-97t-SZO OLl-h7l-SZO 080-7h1-520 OLZ-Z7l-SZO 002-27L-520 066-ZhL-SZO O81-271-SZO OU-ZhI-SZO 09l-Zh1-520 OSl-ZhI-SZO Ohl-ZhI-SZO 0£l-Z7L-520 OZl-ZhI-SZO 011-2h1-520 O10•Zhl•SZO 090-Zht-SZO 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'V 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl 'N'd'tl OLOh6 tlJ O1096 tl� O10h6 tl� O1076 tl� 0�0h6 tl] OL0h6 tl� OLO76 tl� SSZ56 tl� OL076 tl� OL0h6 tl� 85576 tl� 85596 tl] O£0h6 tl� 0£0h6 tl� 0£076 tl� ZOh76 tlJ ' 3WV9N I 1Nf19 '3Wtl9NIlNf18 ' 3Wtl'JN I lN(1H '3Wtf'JNIliIf18 '3Wtl'JNI1809 �3Wtl9NIlNf19 ' 3Wtl`JN I lil(18 '3`JQIN8000R '3Wtl`JNIlaf18 '3Wtl9NIlNf1B 'tldtlN 'tldtlN '3tlN8llIW 3tltlBlllW '3tlL9l�IW '031tlW NVS ltl3N ONIWtlJ l3 £SLl 9# AM OIOd 0�8tlW O7Ll AtlM 0'IOd O�NtlW 99L1 3Atl tlI0f103S 85L1 3AV tlI0f1035 95LL 3�tl lONtl7 91.51 AM 31NtllV�S3 90Lt L99 X09 0 d 3Atl tlI0f103S 09L� 3Atl tlI00D3S h£LL 210 JIOOi183INN08 ZSl NO JIOOH831NN08 ZSl NO NfIdSJINtlI 666 NO N3f1Stll LO£t 2hZ X08 0 d dAlB NO'Jtliltl £OL O7 27'l58 ��NIIItlW SIH1 NOj �NIll18 �037110N SN3NH0 A1N3dONd i0 N3BW�N 1tl101 S371Ai13S NtlWf1N 3AISN3H3NdW0� 0� ANI OIOd O�atlW-Ntl7SI�Ntlai a3lddIN7 70S A1Nf10� 031tlW NtlS Ml d 31117f11 N311S(10� � 0 tlIN3903 NOSN313d N1 3 NtlINtlW AOOON 1 tl03Nj $ W QtltlNO3l N3NNtlN tlS3N3N1 tl1NtlNtll10 tlNf83N $ 3NO1tlAltlS tl1138 IO SN1 d 3NNtl $ 7 Nf1H1Ntl 1Z21�Od SN1 3 IWOtlN 9 l 1S3NN3 MtlHS Stll 3 IWOtlN $ l 1S3NN3 MtlHS l 31tltlW $ WO1 9Ntld Nl N 3'JN03'J SOfi131ii3U d NHOP �Htl Nl W W'8 A SIX3ltl SNI'J'J1H , / � , �� T �� z �v z�m.l� � �r - � �� s ��°- —, -o � s 0 _� . .,�..., ,_ .. _ . �:;� o � i i ,�g s �� U'@1 _� _� •anv vionoas � J � :�� 3,� .ki! . . :.,. �: ... ��-�' . �,? z ¢ J a o u. _ � O _° � � ` w � � �e�- \ 1 \ , � 1 � 1 � \ , � � 1 \ ` \ 1 4 i i , r � �. � .__.. . . F I M+ I � � 1' 1 �I � 0 9•3 10-O±;G•DJj *- �1= :NBIGHHO&. i u PROPOSEDYADbITiON � I 1 ( NEIGHBOR 6•3i� , f ' � � � I I � � ��OUTH r � K . / 1 TH AA ' SI1"E PL.AN.S�CTIONS � � , : i � � 1 r•' ;;�fP'j'Ei.;:,TO��&ESAIN.TH�.PRIyACY.�OF THE � ' .'.NEIGHBORS;' THE ;+- -� DIHENSIpNS HAVE , . � ' � S��Et�[��.VISUALLY�.ESTZHATED.,. :THESE,-�AHE' �d'PPROX�H2,,TIDNSi.- . .. ' �. . .� . . , . � � '• ' g ... _. �. . . . .. .. .. .. ... .. ._.__...... I . �: . -._� ._ _ �. � _ ._........., � � I � ' � � z 'F }