HomeMy WebLinkAbout1801 Adrian Road 2 of 2 - Staff Report (2)City of Burlingame
Planning Division
(650) 558-7250 • (650) 696-3790 (fax)
Plan Review Comments
10. Off-Street Parking (Code Section 25.70.040)
�
� . � '•� . . ; r�lk; , ,� � OWED/
EXISTIN ,,;� ��' POSE UIRED
A'
7811 Adrlan g 181 atl (no hang
lobby/retail 7� lobby/reta�l ��:1
1,655 SF / 1:400 �V = 4.1 1,655 SF /(1:400 F) = 4.1
� )
warehouse/storage warehouse/storage
Uge�: � 29 SF /(1:1,;000 )= 139.3 139,329 F/(1:1,000 SF) = 139.3
!�#:' . ti' S . '
�.
07 Adria `� 01 A tan ��,+ �;
arehouse�g ;r �reh 'se/storage� �� .� ,
�'.�74,626 SF (•1; , = 74.6 146,1 SF (1:1,000 SF) _.: .1
�. ':
Total = 218 spaces _, Total - 289.5 spaces _____
----...........-----......----- -----------....._.....---._ ............._...__. . _.....— -------...
Varia e required for
intens fication of use
Parkin 218 s aces re uired in total 290 s aces re uired in total and not providing
g' p q � � p Q � � required parking on
site (72 parking space
increase)
-------------- — ---....----------- — - --
1811 Adrian = 81 spaces 1811 Adrian = 75 spaces unmet parking:
Total On-Site 1801 Adrian = 86 spaces 1801 Adrian = 30 spaces 185 spaces
Parking: Total = 167 spaces Total = 105 spaces
5% of all spaces shall
Electric 11 spaces 11 spaces be prepared for EV
Vehicle (EV): 6.6% 10.5% charging equipment
(C. S. 25.39.050. F)
— -------- - -------�---------- -
i
24' — 0"
24' — 2'/i' (C.S. 25.70.025
Aisle Widfh: n/a (a)(3) and
25.39.050.C)
18'-0"
Driveway n/a � 20'-0" (C.S.25.70.025
Width: (b)(Z))
• The proposed project requires approval of a Parking Variance; application has been submitted.
Item No.6b
�'il�/ Of BU��IIlg1111@ Environmental Scoping
Environmental Review, Comme�cia/ Design Review, Conditional Use Permits
and Parking Variance
Address: 1801 Adrian Road Meeting Date: September 9, 2019
Request Environmental Scoping, Commercial Design Review, Conditional Use Permits, and Parking Variance
for a two-story addition to an existing one-story commercial building for a personal storage use.
Applicant: Bryan Miranda, Public Storage, Inc. APN: 025-169-050
ArchitectlEngineer: Shab Vakili, KSP Studio Lot Area: 5.82 acres
Properly Owner: Public Storage, Inc.
Zoning: RRMU
General Plan: Live/Work
Environmental Review: Environmental review is required because the proposed project includes adding more
than 10,000 SF to an existing commercial building (85,290 SF addition proposed, mostly within a new second
floor within the existing building), and does not qualify for any exemptions from CEQA (Cal'domia Environmentai
Qualiiy Act). As a part of preparing the Initial Study for the environmental document for this project, staff is
requesting that the Planning Commission comment on any potential environmental effects which should be
investigated. Potential environmental effects identified by staff include on-site parking/circulation and site
access/safeiy issues.
The issues identified by the Commission will be incorporated into the Initial Study for the project. The standard
list of Rems investigated in an Initial Study is attached for reference. At this time, staff notes that k appears that
the type of CEQA document required will be a Mitigated Negative Declaration. However, the type of_CEQA
document will be finalized during the environmental review process. The applicant is requesting the following:
• Conditional Use Permit for a Personal Storage use (Code Section 25.39.020);
• Condftional Use Permit to exceed 1.0 FAR for an industrial use (1.13 FAR proposed where 1.5 FAR is
the maximum allowed) (Code Section 25.39.030 (b)); and
• Parking Variance for number on-site parking spaces (105 on-site parking spaces provided where 290
parking spaces are required for the intensification of use; 185 space deficiency) (Code Sections
25.39.050 and 25.70.040).
Project Description: The project site is comprised of one parcel (253,519 SF) that currently contains two
separate commercial buildings; a iwo-story commercial building (Public Storage) at the front of the lot (1811
Adrian Road) and the subject building at the rear of the lot (1801 Adrian Road). The subject building was
previously occupied by Goodwill. Public Storage is expanding so that theywill occupy and operate their business
in both of the commercial buildings on the lot. There are no changes proposed to the front building.
With this application, the applicant is proposing a two-story addition along the left side of the existing building
totaling 24,444 SF in floor area at 1801 Adrian Road. The proposal also inciudes removal of an existing
meaanine level in order to build a new 60,846 SF second floor within the open space of the existing building for
a total of 85,290 SF in new floor area. A Conditional Use Permit is being requested for the proposed personal
storage use.
The applicant notes that the proposed renovations would accommodate 2,100 storage units with an average
storage unit size of 100 SF. The proposed floor area on the site (including both buildings at 1801 and 1811
Adrian Road) would increase from 0.85 FAR (216,108 SF) to 1.13 FAR (287,618 SF) where 1.5 FAR (360,279
SF) is the maximum allowed. A Conditional Use Permit is being requested because with the proposed project
the FAR on the site will exceed 1.0 FAR.
Environmental Review, Commercial Design Review, Conditional Use Permits 1801 Adrian Road
and Parking Variance
Two new storefront/lobby areas are proposed at the front of the building. These new entries are identified by a
clear anodized aluminum storefront system, clear glazing, and a metal canopy. At the front of each new entry
will be a loading area.
OffStreet Parking: A Parking Variance for a second floor addition within the existing building at 1811 Adrian
Road (front of the lot) was approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, 2015; 167 parking spaces were
proposed where 218 spaces were required (51 spaces not provided). With the proposed additions to 1801
Adrian Road, the proposed parking demand (including both buildings at 1 B01 and 1811 Adrian Road) is 290
parking spaces (increase in 72 spaces required), which inciudes 146,136 SF of personal storage on the first and
second floors (1:1000 SF parking ratio) at 1801 Adrian Road (subject building) plus 139,329 SF of personal
storage and 1,655 SF of lobby/retail space (1:400SF parking ratio) at 1811 Adrian Road. The proposed project
will decrease the number of parking spaces on-site from 167 to 105 spaces where 290 spaces are required.
Therefore, a Parking Variance is being requested for the difference of 185 parking spaces.
Landscaping: When the use in a building is intensified, on-site landscaping must be provided to cuRent code
standards. The RRMU interim zoning district regulations require that a minimum of 15°k ofthe totai area of the
property be landscaped.
The existing Iandscaping (trees, shrubs and tur� will be maintained and provides 10.7% (27,191 Sh� of total on-
site landscaping where 10% (25,352 SF) was the minimum required in the previous zoning for this properly at
the time of the previous Planning Commission approval for the sRe. The applipnt is proposing 10,504 SF of new
plantings and ground coverings plus a 3,095 5F bio-retention basin. With existing and new landscaping, a total
of 16.1 %(40,790 SF� of landscaping is proposed on-site where 15% (38,028 SF) is the minimum required.
1801 Adrian Road
Lot Area: 5.82 acres Plans dats stam ed: Au ust 29, 2019
EXISTING • PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D
warehouse personal storage
(1801 Adrian Road) (1801 Adrian Road) personal storage use
llse: requires a Conditional
retail and personal storage no change Use Permit
(1811 Adrian Road) (1811 Adrian Road)
74,626 SF (1801 Adrian) 146,136 SF (1801 Adrian) �.5 FAR maximum
141,482 SF (1811 Adrian) 141.482 SF (1811 Adrian) allowed with a
F/oorArea Ratio: Z�6,108 SF 287,618 SF Conditional Use Permit
0.85 FAR 1.13 FAR
Lot Coverage: 135,381� SF 147,603 SF 177,463 SF
53.4 /0 58.2 /0 70 /o
Building Neight: 32'-8'/." 32'-8'/.° 50'-0"
Side Sefback (left): 147'-7° 76'-6" 0'-0"
(right): 10'-0" no change 0'-0"
Off-Sbeet Parking: 167 spaces 105 spaces 290 spaces'
Electric Vehicle 11 spaces 11 spaces o 2
(EI� spaces: 6.6% 10.5% 5% of all spaces
2
Environmental Review, Commercial �esign Review, Conditional Use Permits 1801 Adrian Road
and Parkin Variance
EXISTING PROPOSED ( ALLOWED/REQ'D
Alsle �dth: n/a 24'-2'/z 24'-0"
Driveway �dth: n/a 20'-0° 18'-0'
Tota/On-Site 10.7°k 16.1% 15°k
Landscaping: 27,191 SF 40,790 SF 38,028 SF
' Parking Variance requested for number on-site parking spaces (105 on-site parking spaces provided where
290 parking spaces are required for the intensification of use)
z 5% of all spaces shall be prepared for EV charging equipment (C.S. 25.39.050)
Staff Comments: See attached memos from the Building, Engineering, Fire, Parks and Stormwater Divisions.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Commercial Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1652
adopted by the Council on April 16, 2001 are outlined as follows:
'I . Support of the pattem of diverse architectural styles that characterrze the city's commercial areas;
2. Respect and promotion of pedestrian activity by placement of buildings to maximize commercial use of
the street frontage, off-street public spaces, and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street
frontages;
3. On visualiy prominent and gateway sites, whether the design fds the site and is compatible with the
surrounding development;
4. Compatibility of the architecture with the mass, bulk, scale, and existing materials of existing
development and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby;
5. Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among
primary elements of the structure, restores or retains existing or signficant original architectural features,
and is compatible in mass and bulk with other structure in the immediate area; and
6. Provision of sRe features such as fencing, landscaping, and pedestrian circutation that enriches the
existing opportunities of the commercial neighborhood.
Required Findings for a Conditional Use Pertnit: In order to grant a conditional use pertnit for a food
establishment, the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code
Section 25.52.020 a-c):
(a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimentai to the public health, safety, generai welfare, or
convenience;
(b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan
and the purposes of this title;
(c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary
to secure the purposes of this ti�e and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the
aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and poten6al uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity.
3
Environmental Review, Commercial Design Review, Conditional Use Permits 1801 Adrian Road
and Parking Variance
Required Findings for Parking Varlance: In orderto grant a Parking Variance the Planning Commission must
find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d):
(a) there are exceptional or eMraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
that do not apply generally to properiy in the same district;
(b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship;
(c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and
(d) that the use of the property will be compatibie with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing
and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should reviewthe proposed project and the areas of
potential significant environmental effects suggested by staff. The Commission should add any additional effects
of the project that it anticipates might be potentially significant. The areas of investigation for environmental
evalua6on as defined by CEQA are listed on the attached sheet for your reference.
'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi
Associate Planner
c. Bryan Miranda, Public Storage, Inc., applicant
Shab Vakili, KSP Studio, architecUengineer
Attachments:
Environmental Checklist — CEQA Guidelines
Application to the Planning Commission
Conditional Use Permit Application
Variance Application
Parking Study, received August 1, 2019
Environmental Information Fortn
Staff Comments
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed August 30, 2019
Area Map
4
Las9 Than
. Sipnf&an!
Potmlially NfiN LestThan
Sipni&�nt Nitlpatlon SlgniflcaM No
ksua ...Impect Inarporated Ynpxt Impad......
1. AES[HETIC3. E�caept as prori�etl m Pub6c Fieswrrss Code Sectia121099. would tl�e project _.
a) Have a substantial edverse ef(eci on a scenicvisfs7 � � �� �
b) Subsran6alh dama9e scenic resw�ces. indudng, dn not
rmnea ro, u�� rodc autaoppugs. and hisfnric buldngs � � � �
wiMin a slale scenic highwa�?
c) In nonu�ban¢ed areas, subslantialty degrade the rxistirg
visual cheraUUx or qualiry of pudic viexs of the s'de and iLs
surroundngsl(Pubfic views are those that are experienced ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
hom pudidY ��e vantage point). If Me projeG is in an
urbanaed area, wouW the projecl co�lidwith applicade
zoning and other regulatbns goveming scenic qualityl
d) Geale a new sarce of substantial fght ar glare which vauld ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
adversely aftea day a nigMume uiens in the area?
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique FarMand, a Farmland d
Statewide Impatanta (FarM�, a5 shovm an the maps
piepared W rsuaM to Ihe Farmtand Mapping and Mairtomg
Program of �he Cal'rfania Resources Pgency. to non-
2g�W4ur21 usei
b) CanfliG with e�ds6ng xoning for agriculWral use, or a
YYlliamsan Ad ContracC�
c) Conflict wilh ezis6ng zaning fw, or cause rezoning of, forest
land (as defined in Public Resources Cade Section 12220(g)),
timberland (as d�'ined by Pu6Gc Resources Code
Sectian 4526), a timheAand m�ced TiM�erland Pmdution (as
d�'i�d by GovemmeM Cade Section 51704(gp7
� ResuR in the bss of foresl land or conversion of taest land to
nandorestuse?
e) InvdveWl�erchangesinlheeristingenvironmenlwhich.due
ro tl�eir localion or nalure, caW resuR in conversbn oi
Fartnland, to noo-agricuNural use or conversan d faest land
a) ConAidwilh ar obsbuct implert�enlation d ihe appGtable air
quaCtty plan?
b) Resuk in a amulatively cansiduaWe net inaease of any
criteria polufantfa which the project region is nonaMainmenl
under an applicaWe federal or state ambient air quafity
standard?
c) Ezpose sensitive receprors to substantial pollulant
concentrafions?
� Result in other emissiais (such as those leadng to odorsJ
adversdy affecting a substantial number of people7
� � �
� � �
� � �
❑ ❑ ❑
� � �
� �
■ ■
�■
e■
■
■
.
■
�
■
■
�
�
�
■
.
■
Page 4
E �:�tr � ?3�5��� � S m<I � !>. 8 � s ?;��-
�� -• �; `, m m �S �A 1R n
^ .-i � � ,.� � � � 71 ..,� .. �.�� � c a C
C 5[� N 4� �3� p a
� 5 �� oc`gDa` QR Q:�ff $>> <�Si�$m Slm
� � � �' 4.��a�`s��j����RQ, ���:���� �,�T�SI
� y � �. c�i�Q�xq��I.,�Li'�����'�� �@��.
� {� �qy fy
�. m a R$'�ma� aL'ic�, � �Ls�� :�,3 ��`a�
� � � a.m �,A•m $ v,.'�� �; � �+�. `
� "�m'� �f ��� "�msm
� � %', $ � �ry �� � � �ii ��- � � : : �. � � `n' d'
Q. N �.,� 0 O S m � L�. �,� S. ; � �� ��
Ng � ..� y o� $ � � �' ', � �'q � . ra rm 0 m
a p�p a. � � Y .� O _ �G..
� 6 fl. �g O C S� R f� G4l O C� . I !/� � fD V l�
3 �3 m
S' � c J m m �p. � � � 9 � � i � �a. �.
� 4: � d T '_Y, � � � � 3 � � J � �
�s �, &i3d��' = 3s.�� 8. �
� �p 3mQ�'g�� ' �. �� � 8
j N O& � � � , N � O .... . � G. �
� � m
� ... � � ' � � � �
■ ■ . ■ ■
..Y o � g 2'riv o 2 m�_�.'
"y����,��a�`�����m �a��� �Q��m �
� ��Q �� �p���� agyg°' �'.$'3� �8.��°�d g.
C (p C C 6• m G
�s$y89' ���'�yR2��' a�.m�R,�yw$ ��..
9i y `� Q Q� J 4 fl � W m . C y f[. ¢�
� q� gg�i.`� .� n+ tneQ� E�. mt/!
• ��. " � �3'z Y m a' C—o:��' �lyS �^ � O :
a'a!l� 4��p�5'�,�Q��`�€� ���� �R�9�c�i s
W'�A' mN^ ��.vs.�N�'4�dQ��}'�t�ag�vb]Q�•1�t.�.$
H C'yp �S4 �1��� f�l 'J�i ng`G ii ����Y.- ��C
��,5 9� m 3¢� �m � m^�+5$ E
� m.�R � � o _w S �m � S
m �
_ _ �;�.� ��� �a �'�,����.
. � ��� �� 3.�� � ��. g ���' ��� & 4��
�
�v_ �� ��� '��,�'��Q� ��gs
� m S� 4. - 3
R ¢ < gd
� � s . S 3�.R as
. o $ � � g � �T�..�^ W
s
■ ■ ■ ■
❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ '❑ ❑ ; ji❑❑❑
❑❑�❑ ❑ ❑ I ❑ ❑ '❑�❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
�J
�❑
■ ■ ■ ■ ■
m -qsp
�� �
❑ � �s
g = �;
� �� ���
n
�r
��S
�_�
,� ❑❑0❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ �OCI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ ��
�
� _
Bsua
c) Be lopted on a geologic unit or sa1 that is uretable, or N�
woutd became unstade as a resufl oi tMe project, and
potentialty resutt in arF w off-sRe landsfide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, I'puefactiai a cdla�e7
Leas Than
Sipnifinnt
Polentially WXA
Si(plifiCent ►Gdg7dOn
hnpxt Inm'yoraled
uo
� �
Lna Than
SlgnNkant !b
MpaU Impacl
� �
� Be laaled on ecpansive sail, as defined in Tahle 1&1-B d ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
tl�e Unifam BuBdng Code (1994), aeating substan6al dred
a inGrect risks to Iife a propertyt
e) Have soils incapable of adequatety supporting the use oF
where sexcrs are �at ava'lable for tlierdsP� d vraste � � � �
water?
� Diredly a in6rectly destroy a unique palemtalogid resource ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
a sile a unique geologic feaNrel
VIIL GREENHOUSE GAS EINISSIONS. Waild tlie poject -
a) Generate g�eenhouse gas emissiau. eilherduectly a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
indrectly, thal may have a signifipnt impact on the
environmenl?
b) Conflid wAh an aPWicable dan, �oY a regulation aduWed ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
far the purpose of reducing the emissions d greenhouse
gases7
DL HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS YATEtiW.3. Wald ihe project - � —: —
a) CreaOe a signiricant hazard M Gre puWic a tl�e enrironmeM
through the routina trareport, use, w d'aposal of hazardous � � � �
mate�ials7
4) Create a significant hazard to ihe public a tl�e environmenl
thrtxgh reasonably faeseeable upset and acddent tonditions
inuolving Me 21eaze of hazxdous materiak into the
environment?
c) Emit h�ardaus emissians or handle hazardau a acutety
hazaidous mateiials, substances, a x2ste witliin mequarter
mile af an ezis6ng a proposed schod?
dJ Be bc�ed an a sile which is induded on a I'�st of hazardous
malerials sdes comqled pursuant to Goverm�ent Cade
§ 659625 anQ as a rewiC would d create a signifipM hazaN
Do the pubfic a Me environment?
e) For a projecl located witliin an arport land use plan or, where
such a p� has not been adopted, within hw mil� of a public
tirNM or pud'�c use aiipal, would the projed resuft m a safety
hazard a axcessive nase fa people residrig a woridng in tlie
projed area7
0 �� mP��tatian oFa physically irRe�re x�th an adopted
�9�^�Y �P�e P� a er�9encY evxualion pWn?
g) Expose people a strudures, atlier diredly a indirectly, to a
signfipnt risk d bss, injury a death invoNirg wildland fires?
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALIfY. WaAd the project
a) YqlaleanywaterquafityslaMardsarwastedsdwge
requiremenfs or otheiwise subsUntialty degrade suAace w
ground vraler qualil�R
b) Substanfially deaease groundwater supplies w inlerfere
substantially with groundwaler rechxge such that the project
may impede sustaina6le groundwatw managemem ot the
basin?
c) Substantialiy atter ihe exisBng drainage patlem ot ihe sile a
area, indudng through the alterefion of ihe tarse of a stream
or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a
manner which wald:
�
■
■
■
■
❑ ❑ ❑
� � �
� �
� �
� ■
� � ❑
___ _ _ _
❑ ❑ ❑
� � �
� � �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Page 6
btua
i) rasult in a substantial erosbn a siBation ar or d(-sde;
ii) substan6aily inaease the rate or amant of suRace
Nnoft in a manner which would resuR in Aooding on• or
oftsRe;
ii) createorcantributenmoHwalerwhichxouldexceedthe
capaaty M exisfing «planned stamxater drainage
systems ar provide substantial additional sarces of
poluled NnoR; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, 5unami, a seicha zones, risk release of
polutants due lo piojec.l inundation7
� e) ConflidwitliaobsWctimplementatlonofawaterqualiry
tonUd plan a sustanable groundwaler man2gement plan7
XI. IAND USE AND PLANNING. Watl �he projecC
a) Physicaly?videaneshadishedcommuniq/T .
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a oonAid wiUi
any IaiW use d�. P��Y� a regul�on adopted for Ihe
purpose of �rg or midgating an environmental eRect?
m: Mw� t�souRces. wa,a e� �e
a) Result in me bss of availabaity oF a known mineral resource
that would be a value W Ihe region and the residents of ihe
sWte7
b) Result in the bss of availability of a bdly imporlant mineral
reswrce recovery s'rte d�neated an a lacal general plan,
specilk plan or other land use plan?
wn. xas�. wab u,e ao�a resun �:
a) GeneratimofasubsWntialtemporaryorpertnanentinaease
in ambtent noise levels in ihe vkin'dy of the project in ezcess
otstandards astabl'shed in the bcal general plan a naise
ordinance, a applica6le standards of olher agendes7
b) Genera6on of excessive groundbane wbration or
groundhome ndse levels?
c) Fa a pqed localed within ihe vianity oF a private arstrip or
an airpal land use plan a, where such a plan has not been
atbpted, within Nro mles af a pudic airyat a public use
airpoA, would the prajst expose people residng a vrorlcing in
Ihe projed area to rxoessiva ndse kveb7
_ _ _ __ .
JW. POPULATION AND HOUSMfi. Wwld the pnijut
a) Induce substantial unplanned populalion growfh in an area,
eNher diredly (for example, by proposing new hames and
busi�resses) a ind�eGly (for acample, through axtension d
roads or olher iirfrasWcture)7
b) Disqacesubstantialnumbersdezisfingpeopteorhousing,
necessitating the cansWctian of replacement housing
elsewhere?
_ _ _ _ _
XV. WBLIC SERVICES. Wald the paject
a) Result in substandal adverse physical impacts assadated with
Ihe provision of new a physicaity �tered gwemmentai
faalities� need tor nawa Physicalty altered govemmenlal
fxilities. the oonsWction of which toukl cause sign'ficant
environmental impads, in arder to mtinNain acceptable
service rauos, response Omes, w other perfamance
objectives for any d me pubf'�c sernces:
Laa Then
Sipnificanl
Polentlaly WXh L«c ihui
sqnMnnt Mltlgetlon slpniBant No
Impx1 Incorporated Mpxt 6npae!
� � � �
❑ ❑ � �
❑ ❑ ❑ �
■
■
■
h■
I�I
� � �
� � �
� � �
❑ _ ❑ ❑
� � �
_ ____ -
❑ ❑ ❑
� � � �
� �
� �
� �
❑ �
� �
� �
■ ■ ■ .
� � � �
� � � �
Page 7
��❑�0❑� ��. ❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
� ���'�
�����D�O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
��
�����❑�❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ , ' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
��
���o❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
6 N
8 O G
�'. O R S E �',� �� � C
§ � .�,s � ��
a � �"
��� a�� j� _ � ���
g�$�p �.� s � �
�..•a�`-�° �a �di �� � o�s^. �.
U' m � " �
5
��� �� ��� � ��'� �
�
� ��: ��ry��,�� � ���
a'a
�3 �3.$�! s d t���
� �� ��� �'��� '� ��=g�
"' � ,� �,��� ��� �q� �V.�N3.�
� � F �p� �6� ,��,�� �.� �m� 5
�' � � � � ��3�$gF���.� a������g�
���a�;��y ,,,,,�� �h��=�
'SC m � ��� m s ia r'o
,;.
❑ ❑ ❑
„
I,� �''
❑ ❑ ❑
�� ,
,,
❑ ❑ ❑
��, �
❑ ❑ ❑
m � � V �
I'E S E} C �U � O �
� e .Y ,7�' �o � .� � �§ � � m
..����ES "� :@�.� ��m �
� s � �'� s�B ���Z �
�s•-��� ��� �.• ����,�
y:������ �,$'� �a � `a�� i
�U'�H��'�� N K _TB�y+��wm �:��
����8� c�a �N����o �
��°1���� � �� ������� W
�n�j „� o,_:,a :$ �
go.t¢SU S�� € � "��
� �s m �
�Ss���m Q'Xi�o�'r.�d�.�� 8,$.�,
N
w <
�����.�� ����������.��,=d
�����,���J���a��a��`�"� I�
.�:.3-h'a����s� r_ ..
m
�
d
� a
❑
❑
❑
O o �
2 � 8
C � 2 4
� E �
����
� � ��
� � o-
����
d �S�
���.�E
�d���
�s
�� ��
� �#�
�_ = e'$ �
� a .f° .�
'R ^m
Lao Then
SlgnNkant
PountAly WHh La� mm
SlgnNkant IAtlgatlon SlpnHkant No
h�ua Impecl Inwrporaled Impwt Impact
b) Havesuft'icientwatersuppliesavtilaMetoservethapoject ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
and reaaonably foreseeable fuNre development during
namal, dry and multipe dry yeaB7
c) Result in a delertnination by Ure wasle water UealmeM
provider, which serves or may serve the prajecl lhal it has � ❑ ❑ ❑
adequate capadry to serve the prqecfs projeded demand in
addition to Ihe prodders existlng canmimientsT
d) Genarale sdid waste in excess d atate a Iacai s4�ndards, a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
in ezcess of Ihe ppadty o( local inGasWclure, or othe�wise
impair the altainment d sdid wasle reduction goab?
e) Compry with federal, state, and local management and ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
reduc6m statutes ard regulations related to solM waste4
_ __
_ ___ _
_ _ .___
_ __ . ___ _ _.
lOC YYII.DFIRE. H bcded in a near ebN respms�i6ry are� a �aids dass'died m very high fde hazard severity mnes� xwild tlie
Pmlect _ _
a) Substantialiy impair an adopled emergency response pian or ❑ O ❑ ❑
emergency evacualbn plan9
b) Due b sbpe, prevmling winds, and otl�er factors, exacerbale
wildfire risks� and tl�ere�' exP�e P�1� �P�Ls to ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
polutant concentratiore (rom a wildfire a the uncanholled
spread of a wildfire7
c) Require Ihe inshellamon a mantenance of assaiated
infrasWUure (such as roads, tuel breaks, emer9ency waler ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
sarces, pvxer Gnes or dhar u6lities) that may e�cacerbate fire
risk a that may resuR in lemporary or orgoing impacts to ihe
environmenC!
d) ExpasepeaplearsWdurestosignifiwntrisks,inducGng
downsbpe or downstream fiooding or landslides, as a result of � � � �
mnoff, postfira slope instability, a drainage changes?
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SI�NIFICANCE`
_ _
a) Does the projed have Me polen6al ro substantlally degrade.. . .. ....-....
the quaGty of the environmenL substanti�y reduce the habitat
ot a fish awiklfife spedes, ause a fish ax�ldlife populatian
ro drop belowseHsustaining levels, threaten to diminate a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
plant a animal cammunity, substa�ally reduce tl�e number or
reshid the rmge oFa rare a endargwed panl w animal ar
�minateimportaMexamplesdthemejorperiadsof �
CaliFomia h'story or pfehis0oq?
b) Dces the project have impaGs Ihat are individualty limited, bul
wmulatively cansiderable? ('Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental eHecb of a prqect are ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
considerable when viewed in oonnedion with the effecls ot
past prajecCs, ihe eMeds of other arrent projeds, and fhe
effec6 of probable firture projeUs.)
c) �oes the project have environmental ef(eds which will cause ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
substantial adverse effecis on human beings, either direclly «
inaredl�
Page 9
��t�+
COMMUNI7Y DEVELOPNENT DEPARTIAENf • 507 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLJNGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application: q
❑ Design Review 1�1 Variance ❑ Parcei #: O ZS — �(p I— � S a
Q� CondiGonal Use Pertnit ❑ Special Permit ❑ Zoning / Other.
PROJECTADDRESS: IgJD) �driAv, �pn�cJ
APPLICANT
Name: '� (t f,/� w� T'� I R-�' �/ D.k
Address: _ '"1 U ( l � � � I � R � �1U �
C'ity/State2ip: �nl F U� R L l� �(' �
Phone: SS l 8 ���4`t -�( A fSQ
PROPERTY OWNER
Name: (l�1 A.� � ( �R. �rNF� A
Address: �1 (,��_� 1 � �N /�U�.
c�yisr�terc�P: Gl.� Al�� �/�
Phone: $lA' a�IL( ^' 8a�0
E-mail: 1�Y� ( R F�1 D/L � P U Qt-lC.. SfZAn� E-mail:
. L¢ F'l
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
Name: KSP Studio / Shab Vakili
address: Orchard 23 Rd.
Citylstate2ip: Lake ForesU CA/ 92630
Phone: 949-380-3970 xt 342
E-mail: shab@kspstudio.Com
Burlingame Business License #:
��������
r,9Av - 2 2019
CITI' OF 6U�LINGAME
CuD-PLANNING DiV.
Authorbation to Reoroduce Profect Plans:
I hereby grent the City of Burlingame the authority to reproduce upon request and/or post plans submitted wkh this
appiication on the City's webstte as part of the Planning approval process and waive any ctaims against the City
arising out of or related to such action. (Initials of ArchitecUDesigner)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
AFFIDAVR/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury ihat the infortnation given herein is hue and wrted to the
besl of my knowledge and belief.
ApplicanYs signature: � � Date: y ��I 1 ri
I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit fhis application to the Planning
Commission.
Praperty owner's signature: 1 Date: �'�+� I� �( f
Date submitted• 5I2 � � °�
S�HANOOUTS�PCApplkatMn.dot
�-�r.
,i� ` -�:
�..-��- �
�,j�,
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's
Ordinance (Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the
Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your
request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this fortn for assistance with
these questions.
1. Explaln why the proposed use at the proposed location wil! not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general weHare or convenTence.
This project proposes to renovate and expand an existing warehouse building into an auxiliary
facility for the (E)1811 Adrian Rd seif-storage building. The building perimeter and height will
not be altered. The new expansion will match existing building height and fa�ade. The
existing infrastructure will continue to be used to serve the properly, therefore there will be no
impact to public health. The Fire Sprinkler system will be upgraded to meet latest codes and
FD requirements for self-storage. The project will implement necessary improvements to
provide access for persons with disabilities and the elderly, including parking, elevators. We
believe that this project will benefd the public and is consistent with the ciry's goals for
conservation and development.
2 How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the
Burlingame Generel Plan and Zoning Ordinancel
The new zoning is RRMU (Rollins Road Mixed Use) within the Automobile Sales and
Services Overlay district, and lies within the general plan area for Industrial and Office Use.
The adjacent property to the east is an existing Public Storage facilily with the same zoning
and general plan designations we believe that this justifies that a similar facility will meet the
ckies general plan and zoning statutes on a neighboring parcel.
3. How will fhe proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
charecter of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the genera!
vicinityT
The proposed development will maintain the existing aesthetics, mass and bulk of the
current building. This building is set back on the property and acts as the auxiliary
building to the recently redeveloped facility along Adrian Rd.
�='� �: �'� `�: � �1°� �,.,�
...;G - i 2Q1°
.; iY Oi= E3: ��LiNGF�.�1<.�
.. .. � -.. ..li�;:: i„'„
HandautsNariance Application.2008
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME� CA
94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
������5��
r..;G - _ 2�19
G'; Y G�= ?UR�INGAMc
:;i?:�-� '_A^t^JING DI'.�.
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type orwrite neaUy in ink. Refer to the badc of this fortn for assistance with these questions.
a Describe the excep6onal orextraordinarycircumstances orconditions applicable to
your property which do not apply to o�er properties in this area.
The existing building interiors will be renovated with minor improvements to the exterior
facilities. Based on parking study prepared by Lars Andersen & associates dated 8-19-14
for the 1811 Adrian Rd faciliry CUP in 2008. Based on research perfortned on similar
storage facilities the number of visitors is far less than what is required to fill the cityr
parking requirements. We believe that the above stated conditions create a unique
circumstance compared to a warehouse or other types of development in this area.
b. Explalnwhythevarlancerequestisnecessaryforthepreservationandenjoymentofa
substantial property right and what unreasona6le property /oss or unnecessary
hardship might result from the denial of the application.
Based on the City Zoning Code Section 25.70.040 the required parking for a warehouse/
self-storage facility is 1 stall per 1000 sf of warehouse space. The proposed new
development along with the existing storage facility on this property would need 217 stalls
based on this code. Per previously submitted parking study findings it is apparent that the
quantity of stalls required will not be necessary. We believe that the zoning code parking
requirement would over park the site and request this variance.
� Explain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation will not be detrimental or
inju�ous to properly or improvements in the vicinity or to pu6lic health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
The current building is set behind the existing 1811 Adrian rd. facility. The majority of the
building is not visible from Adrian Rd. The building will have interior renovations along
with an expansion that has the same exact appearance. What is being proposed will not
impact public heakh, safety or general weffare of this area.
d How will the proposed project 6e compatible wiffi the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
charecter of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity?
The proposed development is mainly an interior renovation no# impacting the building
aesthetics, mass, bulk or character. The new expansion is an exact height and aesthetics
of the existing building. The existing and new expansion shall be painted to improve
fa�ade and upgrade the whole site
Handouls\Variance ApplicaGon.2008
Parkin� Studv
For
Burlingame, Ca.
Conditional Use Permit
And Parking Variance
Background:
��L� � ��� V
u,�JG -1 �pi9
ciry oF au�uraca���
c��:� ��n!N!r•!r, c�.:
In 2013, Public Storage examined the parking demand at 3 project sites. The objedive of the
study was help Public Storage provide adequate parking spaces for their customers but not over
park the facfliry hence wasting valuable real estate. To accomplish this objective, parking
studies were conducted on similar developments. First, the parking study methodology will be
discussed, and then the results and recommendations.
Methodology:
Public Storage recently studied like properties and observed customer patterns. One summer
month and one winter month were selected and 360 one hour periods were studied on two of
the properties and 450 one hour periods on an additional property, representing each facilit�Js
hours of operatian. Each customer had an individual security code that deactivates the alarm
to their space and is recorded when they entered the facility. The study simply counted the
number of customers entering the facility in each one hour period. The number of units not
building area was used as the denominator because each unR represents a customer. The
results of the studies were as follows:
1801 Adrian Rd
Conclusion:
The average time a customer spent at their storage unit was approximately 15 minutes because
all customers were not there at the same time within each one hour period. So to be
conservative 30 minutes was used for the recommendation. Upon completion of the
expansion, the proposed Storage facility will be composed of approximately 2,100 units
therefore: 2,300' 0.017 • 0.5 =17.8 required parking spaces during peak hours of operation.
Again, Public Storage wants and needs to provide adequate parking to properly service its
customers, and this study demonstrates this. The study also demonstrates that peak hour
traffic is during non-commuting hours.
City of Biulingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlineame.org
cin
�"� ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
���> (to be completed by applicant when Negative Declaration or E���x�n 't:_ i�il� L..►
Report is required)
�uc — ; 2ois
GENERAL INFORMATION CiTY OF gUnL!f,Ga�,��
,-,� ::,� ,,,,.
� .. . , ,..ar.�r� ,.�� cr.
Project Address: 1801 Adrian Rd. Assessor's Pazcel Number: 025-169-050
Applicant Name: Public StgLryan Miranda
Address: 701 Westem Ave.
City/State/Zip: Glendale/CA/91201
Phone: 949-380-3970 xt 324
Properry Owner Name: Public St�/ Bryan Miranda
Address: 701 Westem Ave.
City/State/Zip: Glendale/CA/ 91201
Phone: 818-244-8080
Permit applications required for ttus project (special peraut, vaziance, subdivision map, pazcel map,
condominium pernut, building pemut, etc.): CUP. FAR. pazking variance and Desian Review
Related pecmits, applications and approvals required for this project by City, Regional, State and Federal
Agencies: storm water construction permit — state water boazd
SITE INFORMATION
Site size: 5.82 Acres Acres and 253.519 Square Feet Existing Zoning: RRMU
Existing use(s) of property: IndustriaU Offie
Total Number of Existing Pazking Spaces�: 167 Number of Compact Spaces�:
Number of Existing Structures and Total Square Footage of Each: (21 existine structure. 1811 Adrian =
141 142 sf. 1801 Adrian = 74 626 sf.
Will any s�uctures be demolished forthis project? Yes X No
Size and use of structures to be demolished: N/A
Number and size of existing trees on site2: N/A
Will any of the e�sting tress be removed? Yes X No
If Yes, list number, size and type of trees to be removed:
Are there any nahual or man-made water channels which run through or adjacent to
Yes X No If Yes,
' Ciry of Burlingame tninimum standazd parking space size is 9'x20'. The minimum size for compact parking spaces is S'x17'.
Refer to City of Burlingame Zoning Ordinance C.S. 25J0 for padcing requirements for particular uses.
z Refer to the City of Burlingame's Urban Reforestation and Tme Protection Ordinance (C.S. 11.06) for tree removal pertnit an
ENVREV.FRM
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlineame.ore
Describe in general the existing surrounding land uses to the:
North Industrial
South Industrial
Fast Fwy 101
West Railroad and Indushial
I��i]ZI�� �i7_�;Zi�i��Yl
Project Description: Conversion of an existine one story warehouse into a 2 story storage facilitv with a
New 2 story expansion buildin� on the South side of the building into the nazkin¢ area
Residential Projects:
Number of Dwelling Units: N/A
SizeofUnit(s): N/A
Household size (number of persons per unit) expected: N/A
CommerciaVIndustrial Projects:
Type and square footage of each use: See attached site plan for sc�uare foota�e calculation of storaee use
Estimated number of employees per shift: none- there same number of emplovees existine will remain
Will tlie project involve the use, disposal or emission of potentially ha7ardous materials (including
peh�oleum products)? Yes X No
If Yes, please describe:
Institutional Projects (public facilities, hospitals, schools):
Major funcrion of facility: N/A
Estunated number of employees per shift: N/A
Estimated Occupancy: N/A
For all Projects:
Flood Hazard: Is tlus site within a special flood hazard azea? Yes X No
Land Use: Ifthe project involves a conditional use pemut, variance or rezoning application, please
explain why the applications are required3: CUP is reauired for building FAR. A variance in the nazkina
is require as the city of Burlingame does not have specific stora eg�azking mrio and mini-storase is a very
low traffic eenerator not requiring the same aznount of pazking as wazehouse use. Pazking studv was
submitted for 1811 Adrian CUP process.
; Please fill out and submit the appropriate application focm 9variance special permit, etc.)
ENVREV.FRM
City of Burlingame Planning Departrnent 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.btvlineame.org
Building gross squaze footage: Existing: 74.626 sf. Proposed: 146,136 sf.
Number of floors of construction: Existing: 1 Proposed: 2
Traffic/CirculaHon: Standazd and compact off-street pazking spaces provided:
Existing: Standazd 16
Compact 151
Total 167
Proposed: Standard 105
Compact 0
Total 105
Grading: Amount of dirt/fill material being moved (check one):
X 0-500 cubic yazds 5,000.20,000 cubic yazds
500.5,000 cubic yazds Over 20,000 cubic yazds(indicate amount)
Note: If &11 is being placed over existing bay fill, provide engineering reports which show the effect of
the new fill on the underlying bay mud.
Storm water runoff: Indicate azea of site to be coveted with impervious surfaces (pazking lot paving,
Is the azea with impervious surfaces less than 200 feet away &om a wedand, stream, lagoon or bay?
Yes X No
Noise: Describe noise so�sces and timing of activity generated by your project during construction: _
7am to Spm, noise sources will be bv rio. Construction activiri, site and building.
sources
Vibration: Will the proposal cause vibration ihat may affect adjacent proper[ies? Describe any potential
sources of vibtation: no vibrations aze anticipated
Eaterior Lighting: Please describe any proposed exterior Gghting of the facility4: existing li tinQ to
remain and new liehtin¢ matchine existine shall be urovided at ihe new structure.
Water: Expected amount ofwater usage:
Domesric 250 ¢aUday Peak use 20 eaUmin
Commercial N/A eaUday Peak use N/A ¢aUmin
Expected fire flow demand 2500 eaUmin
As per the C3 regulations set forth by the Califomia Regional Water Quality Conh�ol Boazd, please
respond to the following questions:
l. Would the proposed project result in an increase in pollutant dischazges to receiving waters? No
° Refer to Ciry of Burlingame Exterior Illumination Ordinance (No. I477) regazding requiremenrs which limit exterior
errvrs�v.fxmt
Ciry of Burlingame Plaming Deparmient 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.ore
2. Would the pcoposed project result in significant altention of receiving water quality during or
following wnstruc6on? No
runoff?
Would the proposed project result in increased impervious surfaces and associated increased
4. Would the proposed project create a significant adverse environmental impact to drainage pattems
due to changes in runoff flow rates volumes? NO
5. Would the proposed project result in increased erosion in its watershed? No
6. Is the project tributary to an already impaired water body, as listed on the Clean Water Action
Secrion 303(d) list? If so will it result in an increase in any pollutant for wluch the water body is already
impaired� No
7. Would the proposed project have a potential signiScant environmental impact on surface water
quality, to marine, fresh, or wetland
8. Would the proposed project have a potentially significant adverse icnpact on ground water quality? No
9. Will the proposed project cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable surface or
groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? No
10. Will the project impact aquatic, wedand, or riparian habitat? No
Sewer: Expected daily sewer discharge 150 GPD
Source of wastewater dischazge on site (i.e. restrooms, restaurants, laboratory, material processing, etc.)
ENVREV.FRM
City of Bwlingame Planning Departrnent 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlineame.org
General:
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Provide attaclunent to explain nature of all
items checked `yes'.
Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, or lvlls, or
substantial alteration of ground contours.
Yes No
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands
or roads. X
Change in pattem, scale or chazacter of general azea of project.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
Change in dust, ash, smoke fumes or odors in vicinity.
X
X
X
Change in bay, lagoon, stream, channel or groundwater quality or quantity, or
alteration of existing drainage pattems. X
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity (during X
construction and/or during operation). —
Site on filled land or on slope of 10 % or more.
X
Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, X
flammable materials or explosives. —
Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire water, sewage) X
Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (oil, natural gas, etc.). g
Relationship to a lazger project or series of projects.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements fiunished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this uritial evaluation to the best of
my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented aze true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date 4-30-19 Signature _ /'�"""" _
X
Id.c�i7x�ld7�l
` CITV�O
~� _1
";-- ` �
�� ��
--�;
Project Address:
Project Comments - Planning Applicafion
1801 Adrian Rd, zoned North Rotlins Road Mixed Use District (RRMU), APN:
025-169-050
Description: Request for Environmental Review, Conditionai Use Pertnits for use and floor
area ratio for a remodel and addition to an existing commercial building,
which includes adding a second floor within the existing building.
From: Rick Caro III
Building Division
Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised
plans with your resubmittal:
No comment at this time.
The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as
they will need to be addressed at time of building pertnit subm'rttal.
3) Plans submitted for any commercial project must be designed, wet-stamped, and signed by a
licensed azchitect. 1997 Uniform Administrative Code §302.2 and §302.3.
4) As of January 1, 2014, SB 407 (2009) requires non-compliant plumbing fixtures to be replaced
by water-conserving plumbing fixtures when a property is undergoing alterations or
improvements. This law applies to all residential and commercial property built prior to
January 1,1994. Details can be found at http://www.le 'ne� fo•ca•gov/pub/09-
10/bill/sen/sb 0401-0450/sb 407 bill 20091011 chaptered html. Revise the plans to
show compliance with this requirement
5) Provide two completed copies of ihe Mandatory Measures with the submittal of your plans for
Building Code compliance plan check. In addition, replicate this completed document on the
plans. Note: On the Checklist you must provide a reference that indicates the page of the plans
on wlvch each Measure can be found. BMC 18.30.040, 18.30.045 & 18.30.050.
6) Two sets of structural calculations and two sets of soils report from a geotechnical engineer.
7) Show compliance with all accessibility regulations found in the 2016 CBC for e�cisting buildings
including:
a. Accessible paths oFtravel
b. A level landing must be provided on each side of the door at all required entrances and exiu.
c. Accessible countertops
d. Accessible bativooms
e. Accessible parking
8) Separate toilet facilities are required for each sex, except:
a. Residentialoccupancies
b. Occupancies serving ten or fewer people may have a toilet facility for use by more than one
person at a time, shall be permitted for use by both sexes. 2016 CPC §422.2 #2.
c. Business and Mercantile occupancies with a total occupant load of 50 or less, including
customers and employees, one toilet facility, designed for use by no more than one person at
time, shall be permitted for use by both sexes. 2016 CPC §422.2 #3.
9) Provide details on the plans which show that the entire site complies with all accessibility standards.
NOTE: If full accessible compliance cannot be achieved complete a Reguest for Unreasonab/e Hardship.
10) Specify on the p(ans the location of all required accessible signage. Include references to
sepazate sheeu on the plans which provide details and graphically illustrates the accessible
signage requirements.
I 1) Specify the accessible path of travel from the public right of way, through the main entrance, to the area
of alteration. 2016 CBC § 1009.2 , 11 B-202.4,1 I B-206.21108
12) Specify an accessible path of travel from all required exits to the public right of way.
13) Specify the path of travel from on-site parking, Uvough the main entrance, to the area of alteration
14) Specify a level landing, slope, and cross slope on each side of the door at all required enuances and exits.
2016 CBC § 11 B-302, 11 B-304.2, 11B-305.2
15) Specify accessible countertops where service counters are provided 2016 CBC § l IB-227 & l 1 B-904
16) Provide complete dimensioned details for accessible bathrooms 2016 CBC §11B-213 I 1B-603, 11B-604,
11B-605, 11B-606, 11B-607,11B-608, 11B-609, 11B-610
17) Provide complete, dimensioned details for accessible parking 2016 CBC §t 1 B-208, 11B-502 & 11 B-503
18) Provide details on the pfans which show that the building elevator complies with all accessible standazds.
2016 CBC § 11 B-407.
/9) Please Note: Arc6itects are advised to specify construction dimensions for accessible features that are
below the maximum and above the minimum dimension required as consh�ucrion tolerances generally do
not apply to accessible features. See the California Access Complimrce Marrual — Interpretive Regulation
IIB-8.
20) In the tenant space indicate the location of the "Office" or azea where bookkeeping and financial
reconciliation will take place. If the office is to be located on the mezzanine level then also
indicate an accessible office space on the ground floor. 2016 CBC § 11B-203.9
Reviewed By: Rick Caro III Date: August 2, 2019
650 558-7270
� C�TY �
_. ` �/
�.,�--��
Project Address:
Description:
From:
Project Comments — Planning Applicafion
1801 Adrian Rd, zoned North Rollins Road Mixed Use District (RRMU), APN:
025-169-050
Request for Environmental Review, Conditional Use Pertnits for use and floor
area ra6o for a remodel and addition to an existing commercial building, which
includes adding a second floor within the existing building.
Martin Quan
Public Works Engineering
Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans
with your resubmittal:
al.yinll be con�ingenf:on
4.
'he proposed basin is on top:of the
�. Based on the scope of work, this is a"Type III" project that requires a Stortnwater
Construction Pollution Prevention Permit. This permit is required prior to issuance of a
Building Permit. An initial field inspection is required prior to the start of any construction (on
private property or in the public right-of-way).
2. Any work in the City right-of-way, such as placement of debris bin in street, work in
sidewalk area, public easements, and utility easements, is required to obtain an Encroachment
Permit prior to starting work. Porta potty's are not allowed to be placed in the City right-of-way.
s. Construction hours in the City Public right-of-way are limited to weekdays and non-City
Holidays beiween 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. for all activities (including hauling).
a. Replace damaged and displaced curb, gutter and/or sidewalk fronting site.
s. All water lines connections to city water mains for services or fire line protection are to be
installed per city standard procedures and material specifications. Contact the city Water
department for connection fees. If required, all fire services and services 2" and over will be
installed by builder. All underground fire service connections shall be submitted as separate
Underground Fire Service permit for review and approval.
The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as
they /will need to be addressed at time of building pertnit submittal.
s. Sewer Backwater Protection Certification is required for the installation of any new sewer
fixture per Ordinance No. 1710. The Sewer Backwater Protection Certificate is required prior to
the issuance of Building Pertnit.
�. Insert the 'Best Management Practices', updated June 2014, construction sheet into the
plans set. A copy can be found at
or
a. Please submit an erosion control plan. This plan shall include, but not limited to,
delineation of area of work, show primary and secondary erosion control measures, protection
of creek or storm drain inlets, perimeter controls, protections for construction access points,
and sediment control measures.
s. A survey by a licensed surveyor or engineer is required. The survey shail show how the
property lines were detertnined and that the property comers were set with surveyors license
numbers on durable monuments. This survey shall be attached to the construction plans. All
corners need to be maintained or reinstalled before the building final. All property corners shall
be maintained during construction or reestablished at the end of the project.
Reviewed By: Martin Quan Date: S/29/19
650-55&7245
/;-=�TY.�.
�s �
\\ ` �
'�—: —
Project Address:
Description:
From:
Project Comments — Planning Application
1801 Adrian Rd, zoned North Rollins Road Mixed Use District (RRMU), APN:
025-169-050
Request for Environmental Review, Conditional Use Permits for use and floor
area ratio for a remodel and addit7on to an existing commercial building, which
includes adding a second floor within the existing building.
Christine Reed
with your resubmittal:
Sheet 2:
1.
2.
3.
4.
a wntten response
Provide fire apparatus tum around consistent with §503.2.5, CFC for the end of the east
driveway. While most of the footprint of the building is existing, modification and
consideration is given to this requirement based upon remodel.
Fire lanes and tumarounds shall be identfied with red lane markings stating Fire Lane — No
Parking.
Exterior exit path surfaces to be level all-weather surface and path accommodated with
eMerior lighting.
East side exterior — new loading areas (hatched areas) not allowed to encroach into
pedestrian exit discharge or to block the northeast comer area (same area as tumaround)
so Fire Dept. has access to north side of property.
.i.r....r�- .� mF.�X?MT. ••�V�^/"• cPY.:':1' e •..:...�. •�.ra'4. �:.4`6•M.Nv.x Ra' v9� -� .. �.P�I
8-10-79 �tems�aiJdressed: ,Item �1. AVtemate�Nleans of Protectlon �aoorov :in�iieu, -fi�e'a"cce's""s.
The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as
they will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal.
2.
3.
►.�
Sheet 2:
a. New security gates must have Knox key switch electrically connected to allow for Fire
Dept. emergency access.
b. Building address must be visible at security gate and on building per Burlingame
Municipal Code requirements.
Existing fire sprinkler system must be modified to comply with NFPA 13 for new use. Fire
sprinkler plans shall be submitted under separate permit through the fire department for
approval prior to installation. Sprinkier system flow switch and control valves shall be
supervised electronically and monitored by an approved central receiving station.
The appiicant shall ensure proper drainage in accordance with the City of Burlingame
Engineering Standards is available for the fire sprinkler main drain and inspector test on the
building plumbing drawings.
The existing backflow prevention device/doubie check valve assembly for sprinkler system
may need to be relocated to aboveground 'rf it is not currently located above ground.
Contractor to verify with the Burlingame Water Department 'rf the existing backflow
prevention device for the fire sprinkler system is in compiiance.
Revlewed By: Christine Reed Date: 8-10-19 650-558-7617
r,�% ciTv\°�
4� �
-�- t �
�—=i ":
Project Address:
Description:
From:
Project Comments — Planning Applicafion
1801 Adrian Rd, zoned North Rollins Road Mixed Use District (RRMU), APN:
025-169-050
Request for Environmental Review, Conditional Use Permits for use and floor
area ratio for a remodel and addition to an existing commercial building, which
includes adding a second floor within the existing building.
Bob Disco
Parks Division
Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans
with your resubmittal:
No comments
The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they
will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal.
Reviewed By: BD Date: 5.16.19
650.558.7333
ciTv
~� —� �
� �,
�� _
Project Address:
Project Comments — Planning Application
1801 Adrian Rd, zoned North Rollins Road Mixed Use District (RRMU), APN:
025-169-050
Description: Request for Environmental Review, Conditional Use Pertnifs for use and floor
area retio fora remodel and addition to an existing commercial building, which
includes adding a second floor within the existing building.
From: Jennrfer Lee
Stortnwater
Please address the following comments at this time; provide a written response and revised plans
with your resubmittal:
This project is required to comply with the Provision C.3 and C.6 of the San Francisco Bay Municipal
Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP) since it will create and/or replace 10,000 square feet or more
of impervious surface and will replace 50 percent or more of site impervious surface. Stormwater source
control and treatment requirements shall appiy to the entire project sfte.
Please complete, sign and return the "C.3/C.6 Development Review ChecklisY' and the following
worksheets, which are available at www.burlinname.oralstormwaterdevelopment
a. Worksheet A, C.6 Construction Stortnwater BMPs
b. Worksheet B, C.3 Source Controls
c. Worksheet C, Low Impact Development-5ite Design Measures
d. Worksheet D, C.3 Regulated Project — Stormwater Treatment Measures
e. Worksheet E, Hydromodification Management
f. Worksheet F, Special Projects (if applicable)
g. Worksheet F-2, Special Projects Reporting Form (if applicable)
For additional information, please see the C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance handbook at
www.flowstobay. orq/newdevelo oment
The following comments do not need to be addressed now, but you should be aware of them as they
will need to be addressed at time of building permit submittal.
The building permit appiication plans shall show the marking of the words °No Dumping! Flows
to Ba�J' or equivalent on all stortn drain inlets surrounding and within the projec[ site consistent
with the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program's C.3 Technical Guidance.
Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the c'dy's stormwater
NPDES permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction-related activities. Project
proponents shall ensure that all contractors implement appropriate and effective Best
Management Practices (BMPs) during all phases of construction, including demolition. When
submitting plans for a building pertnit, please include the Construction BMP pian sheet.
An electronic file is available at: www.burlinaame.orq/stormwaterdevelonment.
Required Best Management Practices (BMPs) apply to all construction projects utilizing
architectural copper. Please read the "Requirements for Architectural Copper" fact sheet
available at www.burlinaame.orca/stormwaterdevelopment
Post-construction treatment measures must be designed, installed, and hydraulically-sized to
treat a spec�ed amount of runoff. The project plan submittals shall identify the owner and
maintenance party responsibie for the ongoing inspection and maintenance of the post-
construction stormwater treatment measures in perpetuity. A completed, notarized
Stormwater Treatment Measure Maintenance Agreement must be submitted to the City
prior to the issuance of a final construction inspection.
Reviewed By: Jennifer Lee Date: 5/13/2019
650-558-7381
1801 Adrian Road
300' noticing
APN #: 025.169.050
•do
�
�o
ao
�v'i��ll�, .: /
�')
/,
i �
�p� ,r
4 , �
�
f
. �d'�. � r �� .
�
i
F�
a
�
D�
�