HomeMy WebLinkAbout832 Edgehill Drive - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame
Design Review, Variances and Special Permit
Address: 832 Edgehill Drive
Item No. 3
Action Item
Meeting Date: October 15, 2013
Request: Application for Design Review, Side and Rear Setback Variances and Special Permit for a first
floor addition (considered two-story at the rear of the house) and a new attached garage.
Applicant and Designer: Donald Yu, Yuflux Engineering LLC
Property Owner: Marc Maniscalco
General Plan: Low Density Residential
APN: 029-022-110
Lot Area: 4077 SF
Zoning: C-R
Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that
additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in
an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition.
Summary: The subject property is a through lot with frontages on Edgehill Drive and California Drive. It is
substandard in size (4077 SF existing where 5000 SF is required) and width (45'-0" existing where 50'-0" is
required). Pedestrian and vehicular access is provided only on Edgehill Drive. The subject property is zoned
C-R (Commercial-Residential), which encourages a mixed residential-commercial land use with pedestrian
oriented retail uses compatible with residential uses. However, since the existing and proposed use on the
property is a single family dwelling, the project is subject to the R-1 District development guidelines (Chapter
25.26). For development purposes, the front of the lot is considered to be along Edgehill Drive.
The existing single family dwelling contains 1,450 SF (0.35 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms.
Currently, there is no existing covered parking on the site, only uncovered parking spaces in an existing
driveway. The County Assessor's Appraisal Report indicates that at some point a detached single-car garage
existed at the rear of the site (no date provided on appraisal report). It is not known when the previously
existing detached garage was removed.
The existing house is single story. However, due to the downward slope towards California Drive there is a
large crawl space at the rear of the house. The mass and bulk at the rear of the house is that of a two-story
structure, therefore the proposed addition at the rear is subject to design review and second floor setback
requirements. With this application, the applicant is proposing an 80 SF second floor addition and a new 264
SF attached single-car garage at the rear of the house. With the proposed addition, the floor area will
increase to 1,842 SF (0.45 FAR) where the zoning code allows a maximum of 2,405 SF (0.59 FAR). The
proposed project is 563 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The proposed addition requires several
applications and exceptions to the code which are listed below.
With the addition, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from two to three. Two parking spaces, one
of which must be covered, are required on site. The proposed attached garage (10'-0" x 23'-0" clear interior
dimensions) provides one code-compliant covered parking space for the proposed three-bedroom house.
One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been
met. The applicant is requesting the following applications:
■ Design Review for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling (considered two-story at the
rear of the house) and a new attached garage (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2) and (a) (6));
■ Side Setback Variance for an addition along the left side property line (2'-9" existing and proposed
where 4'-0" is the minimum required) (C.S. 25.26.072 (c) (1));
■ Side Setback Variance for a new attached garage along the right side property line (0'-0" proposed
where 4'-0" is the minimum required) (C.S. 25.26.072 (c) (1));
■ Rear Setback Variance for a proposed stairway and attached garage on the first floor (10'-3" proposed
to the stairway and 13'-7" proposed to the attached garage where 15'-0" is the minimum required)
(C.S. 25.26.072 (d) (1));
Design Review, Variances and Special Permit
832 Edgehill Drive
■ Rear Setback Variance for an addition on the second floor (10'-3" proposed to the landing and 13'-7"
proposed to the house where 20'-0" is the minimum required) (C.S. 25.26.072 (d) (2));
■ Lot Coverage Variance for an addition to an existing single family dwelling and new attached garage
(2013 SF, 49.3% proposed where 1631 SF, 40% is the maximum allowed) (C.S. 25.26.065); and
■ Special Permit for a new attached single-car garage (C.S. 25.26.035 (a)).
832 Edgehill Drive
�ot Area: 4077 SF Plans Date Stam ed: October 2, 2013
EXISTING PREVIOUS CURRENT ALLOWED/REQ'D
(08.30.13 plans) (10.02.13 plans)
SETBACKS :
....... ........................................ .............................................;.. . .
. .
Front (1sf flr): 19'-9" no change no change 15'-0"/block avg
(2nd flr): n/a n/a n/a 20'-0"
:............................................... .. � . .................
Side (left): 2'-9" ' 2'-9" � 2'-9��...Z ................. ...... 4.�._0��...................................
(righf): ; 11'-2" 0'-0" to att. garage 0'-0" to att. garage 3 4'-0"
. ................... _: . ... . .................... ;
,
Rear (1st flr): : 15'-6" 0'-0" to att. garage 10'-3" to stairway/ 15'-0"
13'-7" to att. garage 5
(2nd flr): 15'-6" 4 13'-0" 10'-3" to stairway/ 20'-0"
13'-7" to house 6
......................................................:...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
: ..............................................................................................................
Lot Coverage: ; 1600 SF 1915 SF 2013 SF 1631 SF
39.2% 46.9% 49.3%' 40%
: ................................................... :
: ........................ ,...................................................................... ... .. ...............
FAR: ; 1450 SF 1813 SF 1842 SF 2405 SF 8
0.35 FAR 0.44 FAR 0.45 FAR 0.59 FAR
_ ....................................................................... ............:......................... _ ,
# of bedrooms: 2 3 3 ---
. ............................................................................. . ,.
Off-Street : 0 covered 9 1 covered 1 covered 1 covered
Parkin 10'-0" x 20'-0" 10'-0" x 23'-0" 10'-0" x 20'-0"
9� : i ) ' i ) � )
1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered
(9'-0" x 20'-0") (9'-0" x 20'-0") (9'-0" x 20'-0") (9'-0" x 20'-0")
....................... . : .. .. ... . ........................................ . _ .
; _ .......... ............ ... ...............................................................� ........................................
Height: 15'-5" 15'-5" 15 -5 30 -0
;... . ................................................. .. ........................
DH Envelope: : n/a complies with DHE complies with DHE CS 25.26.075
' Existing nonconforming left side setback (2'-9" existing where 4'-0" is the minimum required).
2 Side Setback Variance required for an addition along the left side property line (2'-9" existing and
proposed where 4'-0" is the minimum required).
3 Side Setback Variance required for a proposed attached garage (0'-0" proposed where 4'-0" is the
minimum required.)
4 Existing nonconforming second floor rear setback (15'-6" existing where 20'-0" is the minimum required).
5 Rear Setback Variance for a proposed stairway and attached garage on the first floor (10'-3" proposed to
the stairway and 13'-7" proposed to the attached garage where 15'-0" is the minimum required)
6 Rear Setback Variance for an addition on the second floor (10'-3" proposed to the landing and 13'-7"
proposed to the house where 20'-0" is the minimum required).
' Lot Coverage Variance for an addition to an existing single family dwelling and new attached garage
(2013 SF, 49.3% proposed where 1631 SF, 40% is the maximum allowed).
8 (0.32 x 4077 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2405 SF (0.59 FAR)
9 Existing nonconforming off-street parking (currently there is no covered parking on site).
�a
Design Review, Variances and Special Permit
832 Edgehill Drive
Staff Comments: See attached comments from the Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, City Engineer,
Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator.
Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on
September 23, 2013, the Commission had several questions and comments regarding this project and
voted to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when the plans have been revised as directed
(September 23, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes). The designer submitted a response letter and
revised plans date stamped October 2, 2013. Listed below are the Commissions' comments and
responses by the applicant. Please also refer to the copy of the September 23, 2013 Planning
Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission questions and
comments.
If the garage were pulled forward, then the potential may exist to place commercial
development on the California Drive frontage. Could move the garage forward to provide yard
space without impacting the window for the bathroom. If the garage is pulled forward,
would eliminate the view from California Drive and provide a useab/e rear-yard.
• The applicant moved the garage forward an additional 13'-7" so that it matches the proposed rear
setback of the house (0'-0" rear setback previously proposed) (see revised plans date stamped
October 2, 2013). Planning staff would note that a Rear Setback Variance is still required for the
attached garage (13'-7" proposed where 15'-0"is the minimum required).
The applicant also increased the size of the garage by 33 SF, from 11' x 21' (231 SF) to 11' x 24'
(264 SF). Planning staff would note that the landing/stairs and enlarged garage increases the lot
coverage to 2,013 SF (49.3%) where 40% is the maximum allowed (Lot Coverage Variance was
requested for the previous proposal).
2. There should a/so be a connection from the interior of the house to the rear yard. Is there a
place to install an interior stair to the rear yard? Could access be through the garage to the
rear yard? Could extend a hallway to the rear yard that would make it more usab/e. Would be a
means of encouraging fhe future use of the area. Would consider an additional variance as it
would provide a means of access to the rear yard and enhancing the livabilify of the property.
The applicant added a landing and stairway at the rear of the house to provide access to the rear
yard (see revised Proposed Ground Floor Plan, sheet A3, date stamped October 2, 2013). The
proposed landing/stairs requires Rear Setback Variances on the first and second floors (10'-3"
proposed where 15'-0"/20'-0" is the minimum required on the first and second floors) (see attached
Variance Application date stamped October 2, 2013). A door was also added at the rear of the
garage to provide access to the rear yard.
Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by
the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows:
Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
�3
Design Review, Variances and Special Permit
832 Edgehill Drive
Required Findings for Variance: In order to grant a Variance the Planning Commission must find that
the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d):
(a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property
involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district;
(b) the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship;
(c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in
the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or
convenience; and
(d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of
existing an potential uses of properties in the general vicinity.
Findings for a Special Permit: In order to grant a Special Permit for an attached garage, the Planning
Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.51.020 a-d):
(a) The blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or
addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the existing street and
neighborhood;
(b) the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of the proposed new
structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street and neighborhood;
(c) the proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the city;
and
(d) removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary
and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements, and the mitigation for the removal
that is proposed is appropriate.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the
application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should
include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution
of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public
hearing the following conditions should be considered:
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date
stamped October 2, 2013, sheets A1 through A6, BMP and GB1;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof
height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division
or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would
include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's August 23 and July 12, 2013 memos, the City
Engineer's August 15, 2013 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 24, 2013 memo, the City Arborist's
September 4, August 26 and July 18, 2013 memos, and the Stormwater Coordinator's July 17,
2013 memo shall be met;
4
Design Review, Variances and Special Permit 832 Edgehill Drive
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be
placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development
Director;
6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the
site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required
to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction
plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the
Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of
approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of
approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the
approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal;
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building
permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance
which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification
that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing,
such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural
certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the
Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; and
12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
Ruben Hurin
Senior Planner
c. Donald Yu, Yuflux Engineering LLC, applicant and designer
5
Design Review, Variances and Special Permit
Attachments:
Applicant's Response to Commission's comments, letter date stamped October 2, 2013
September 23, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes
Application to the Planning Commission
Variance Applications
Special Permit Application
Photographs of Neighborhood
Staff Comments
Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed)
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed October 4, 2013
Aerial Photo
832 Edgehill Drive
C�
� i
YUFLUX
ENGINEERING LLC
54 I BA Geary Blvd
San Fran�is�o, Ca 94 I 2 I
Project Address:
Permit App #
Planning Commission Response
832 Edgehill Dr
San Francisco, Ca
PERMIT NUMBER
� 1' OF BUR�I�lGAME
`? � F!;_nfi,�n;i�,�r. �-��V.
1) Move the proposed �ara�e forward to create more useable backvard space.
a. Garage location has been revised and moved forward to be flush with
rear wall of main structure.
i. See sheets A1, A3, A4, & A5 (Floor Plans & Elevations)
2) Add a landin� and stairwav at the rear of the house to provide access from the
house to the rear yard. If this is proposed, a Rear Setback Variance wil be
required.
a. Rear landing and stairway added to plans. Interior floor plan
reconfigured where required for access to rear stairway.
i. See sheets A1, A3, A4, & A5 (Floor Plans & Elevations)
b. Variance Application
i. See attachment
3) Planning Commission also su��ested addin� a door at the rear of the �ara�e to
provide access to the rear vard.
a. Door from garage door to rear yard added.
i. See sheets A3 & A4
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minutes September 23, 2013
8. 832 EDGEHILL DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SIDE AND REAR
SETBACK VARIANCES AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION (CONSIDERED TWO-
STORY AT THE REAR OF THE HOUSE) AND A NEW ATTACHED GARAGE (DONALD YU, APPLICANT
AND DESIGNER; MARC MANISCALCO, PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN
All Commissioners had visited the property. There were no ex-parte communications. Reference staff
report dated September 23, 2013, with attachments. Senior Planner Hurin briefly presented the project
description.
Questions of Staff:
Would a carport be acceptable? Could it be in the setback? (Hurin — the applicant could build a
carport, but it must have a solid covering. If it is detached, it could be in the rear 30% of the lot
without required setbacks. .However, there is a 4-foot minimum distance requirement from the home
for a detached garage that cannot be met in this instance.)
Chair Sargent opened the public comment period.
Donald Yu and Marc Maniscalco represented the applicant.
Commission comments:
■ Tough lot, there are grounds for the variances.
■ Substandard Lot due to area and width.
■ Adding covered parking where none is available.
■ Simple application.
■ In the future he may wish to consider other options.
■ Why not add more to the garage as a second story. Did the applicant look at adding a second story
at the front of the lot (Edgehill side). (Maniscalco — would add significantly to the cost. Yu — hasn't
been considered.)
■ Why isn't the garage attached to the house? How will the area be maintained? (Maniscalco — there
is a small gap between structures. Yu — the garage will still need to be fire rated.)
■ Has a problem with the view from California Drive. Is there anything that can be done to the
California Drive wall to make it appear better? (Yu — currently no plans to alter this area.
Maniscalco — can continue the stone from the front of the house at this location.)
■ Seems like it would be pretty easy to just ask for a second story rather than ask for so many
variances. (Maniscalco — better for the family to keep everything on one floor. Has an elderly
mother. Wants to minimize the amount of stairs.)
■ If the garage is pulled forward, would eliminate the view from California Drive and provide a useable
rear-yard. How do you get to the rear yard? (Maniscalco — is an alley that provides access to the
rear. The area will be redone as some form of patio, but not that desirable due to the presence of
the railroad and California Drive.)
■ Having a rear yard could provide a place for more greenery to shield the view from California Drive.
■ Doesn't believe the rear yard will be used in this instance.
■ Is there a place to install an interior stair to the rear yard? Could access be through the garage to
the rear yard?
■ Why is there no landscape plan provided with the plans? (Hurin — since there are no changes to be
made to the landscaping, and due to the minor nature of the addition, a landscape plan is not
required.)
■ Is there a hardscape limitation? (Hurin — no.)
■ Does the project meet the minimum requirement for trees? (Hurin — yes.)
21
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Unapproved Minufes Sepfember 23, 2013
■ Could move the garage forward to provide yard space without impacting the window for the
bathroom.
■ Would provide the opportunity to provide a closet and access to the rear yard.
■ Could extend a hallway to the rear yard that would make it more usable. Would be a means of
encouraging the future use of the area. (Yu — would the Commission be willing to accept an
additional variance? Hurin — would be subject to setback requirements if a stairway is above 30-
inches high.)
■ Would consider an additional variance as it would provide a means of access to the rear yard and
enhancing the livability of the property.
■ Why not have the garage share the wall with the house? (Yu — cheaper to build a new wall. Feels it
could be a water issue.)
Public comments:
None.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Additional Commission comments:
■ Accepts the variances necessary for the garage. Sees other options to adding a bedroom to the
house. Likes the idea of providing a path to the rear yard. This is an example of taking the easiest
path for the bedroom addition, but not the best solution for the addition. The justification for the
variances for the addition are not adequately justified.
■ Could be adding a car by adding the bedroom.
■ Is compelled by the argument regarding the CR zoning on the property requiring no rear setback.
This is the sole remaining single-family home in the area and is required to comply with the R-1
setbacks.
■ Noted that the other side of Edgehill includes only single-family residences.
■ The California Drive frontage is purely commercial.
■ If the garage were pulled forward, then the potential may exist to place commercial development on
the California Drive frontage.
■ Noted that the excavation cost would be so expensive that the presence of the garage would not be
a deterrent.
■ Could the lower level have been excavated to allow more space to be built there?
■ Could a garage have been built with frontage on California Drive? (Hurin — Public Works would not
allow a new curb-cut on California Drive.
■ Garage should be pulled forward. There should also be a connection from the interior of the house
to the rear yard.
Commissioner Gaul made a motion to place the item on the RegularAction Calendar when complete.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie.
Discussion of motion:
None.
Chair Sargent called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the RegularAction Calendar when plans
have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vofe 6-1-0-0 (Commissioner Davis
dissenting). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at
9:25 p.m.
22
� CITY
r i d l il�
�,��,�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
Design Review
❑ Conditional Use Permit
Variance ❑ Parcel #: �Z� � d 2 2— 1 � �
Special Permit ❑ Other:
PROJECT ADDRESS: �JZ '� C��I�ILL� IiI�
� Please indicate the contact person for this project
APPLICANT project contact person� PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name: �jT�� �, Name: Q rC I�' �(�Lh lS�'l•t, �(�U
Address: �}��I � ��'�� �-v�
City/State/Zip: �tt1� �-�,C�.�� ���- ��Z`
Phone: �UQ��11—b�U2.
Fax: q1�—°��g�q-6��
E-mail: �y�l �A'i�.VIX. CiW1 _
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER pro�ect contact personi�
OK to send electronic gopies of documents �
Name:
Address: 2 i.� � � S Pi cd r�s � Y _
City/State/Zip: �`^� << ��lah"�- C� 9 y�/n
Phone: l� �% � 20 y �j �S
Fax:
E-mail: �al��• ���iSCA�C.V �DII'�OU �'GOW�
Address: � �Q � �mCy �✓��� _
City/State/Zip: � �2i�C1�0 � '(� �1��
Phone: �-b�j�(� ���Z
Fax: 4�� � ��0�"�i'D�0
E-mail: j���.`� `�U��1/t�.�
* Burlingame Business License #: gg � 3
�.:m ;� � � �
�__ 1 1 2(i �
3IJ;L!�lGA9UIE
, ,. ,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ��CLU� Y�G� A"�C ���� G'N�rt �� i������✓� �RW�
�I��IZa�ITI� ��TI.S���1 �-fi 12k�r1� �p�u� 2��1�`� - ��l,i i�l�lnl ('cV��
�$��I a �flG� RT IQ�ftl�
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I here ertify under enalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
Applicant's signature: Date: �$ 13
I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning
Commission. —
Property owner's signature: /� � Date: �� I I�i0 1?j
Date submitted: 7 ��I1-3
�r Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s:�HaN�ouTs�PcaPplicotion 2oos.hondout.doc
This Space for CDD
Staff Use Only
�
Project Description:
�i; r..���-�� �'�� 5, \�t,�tt�,J S x.e�l ,�- �,� �,� �,� c
,
�i! �/1 {G�/�1��-- V G'V�✓i �G-C' A oI,, [v�I G�IL �J LN\� VC 't� l_ ,�\ �' l
� � C �EI i�- � ��- � � �" �C- C c��
�y}z�.�v1 �.Plc�< �-t L✓� ut vl� U�-E;liv �%t:i'�-�to� Gt.��� � ��, v� �;'��?� �
lJ p�
c - t/Vt � (� l�-�� ( � ✓� l:� t�
Key :
Abbreviation Term
CUP Conditional Use Permit
DHE Declining Height Envelope
DSR Design Review
E Existin
N New
SFD Single Family Dwelling
SP Special Permit
�r� c11�
:'�.'�►' .�
1�,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
Rear Set back due to Rear Stairway <20'-0"
_ ,.��_ ,._ �
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
Subject property is in zoning district C-R. All other lots are either fully covered to the
property line or does not meet the minimum 20 feet rear setback requirement on
California Dr. Subject property is the only property on the block which is either not fully
covered to the property line or meets the 20 feet rear setback requirement.
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property /oss or unnecessary
hardship might result from the denial of the application.
Subject property has an extraordinarily low lot coverage compared to its' neighbors and
has a comparably smaller lot area of 4140 sqft when compared to the other lots on the block.
If denied, the subject property poses to lose a substantial gain of one covered parking space,
an increase of habitable living space, and rear yard access.
c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
The proposed project is to be used as a single family residential property. The subject
property will not be detrimental to property in the vicinity to public health, safety, general
welfare, or convenience. The proposed use of the property will remain the same.
d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity?
The proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk, and character of
the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties. The proposed project will retain the
existing structures architectural features and shall not disturb California Drive's current mixed
use commercial massing, bulk, and character.
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Handouts\Variance Application.2008
Variance Appi cation for OFT setback for covered parking.
A. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicabJe to your
property which do not apply to other propertres in this area.
All homes in Qurlingame are required to have covered parking. There used to be a single car
garage at 832 edgehill v�,�hen onf� looks at 2010 google maps. It was an older structure that was
reinovec: by the bank before selling the properiy in 2012. It was removed by the bank to make
tV�e property look more appealing. The old garage was right on the property line just like the
proposed garage. The subject property has an unusually small lot and there is no other pface to
put a covered parking garage. A detached garage is olc �vith the owner but it is just not possible
with the abnormGlly small lot tc be considered detached by the City of Burlingame code. The
mfnirnurn requirements for the garage are 20ft x lOft. Even if a 20x10 garage was placed at the
rc�a� E�ro:�erty line with a OF� se-bacl< it wouid not be far enough away from the house to be
considered a detached garage. P{ease nate that the proposed garage will not be attached to the
horr�e it will just be very close. There will be no entry to the garage from the house.
E3. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property righi and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship
miyht resu(t from the denial vf the application
Subject property has an extraordinarily low lot coverage compared to its neighbors and has
a comparably smaller lot area of 4140 sq ft when compared ta the other lots on the block. It
is a requirement to have enclosed parl<ing and right now the home is not complying with
this Burlinaame Code. I wish to have � parl<ing garage so my mother can park her car in a
safe place. Thcrc� are many apar,ment complexes on Edgehill road and it can sometimes be
difflcult to park on the street. Also I plan on purchasing my mother a Nissan Leaf, 100%
electric car, and it would neec. to be parked inside so we can charge it for her every night.
C. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious
to property or irnprovements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or
convenrence.
1 he proposed project �vill not cause any detrimental or injurious factors to public health,
safety, general v✓elfare or convenience. The proposed project simply adds tovered parking
bacl< to the home. This will improve the neighborhood because it will open up more parking
to :he rest of the community. The housE� �viil also be in compliance and match the other
homes �n the area. The proposed �arage �vill be a simple 20FT X lOFT garage suitable for 1
car.
..���� 'i� ��
JUi_. 12 20i3
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DIV.
��
BLfRLINGAME
�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARIANCE APPUCATION
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe fhe exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
Subject property has an existing side setback of 1'-8" at the rear. Adjacent neighbors on the block
are all built out to 0'-0" side setbacks, or have projections from the main structure out to the
property line.
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship might result from the denial of the application.
Subject property's floor area is low compared with it's neighbors on the block. Having the 1'-8"
setback at the left side property line would help better utilize the property into a more usable
habitable space.
c.
Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
Subject property is only a residential property and shall not effect the commercial nature
of California Dr.
d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity?
The proposed project will match existing aesthetics and shall not disturb California Dr's
current commercial massing, bulk, and character.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • SO1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
Left Side Property Line Setback < 4'-0"
Handouts\Variance Application.2008
Variance Application for less than 20FT rear setback.
A. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your
property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
The subject property is in zoning district C-R. All other lots are either fully covered to the
property line or does not meet the minirr�um 20ft rear setback requirement on California drive.
Neighboring properties are either massive apartment buildings with 4+ units or Duplex's with
connectir�g commercial properties on California drive. 840 edgehill has 5 bedrooms and S
bathrooms with a hair salon. 828 Edgehill is an apartment complex with S units with 9
bedrooms. These addresses are to the right and left of the subject property, 832 edgehill. There
are 0 FT setbacks on most of these properties with mixed usage. The subject property neighbors
a hair salor� ar�d personal training studio on the California drive side. The subject property is only
1 story, however due to the unusual slope this addition is considered a second story. It is only
7FT underneath this addition which the allowable for a single story is 6FT. The entire house is 1
level and wiil be extended out as if it was 1 story. There will be no bottom floor or livable area
below this new addition. If it was considered a single story addition it would meet the rear set
back variance of 15FT. The proposed project shows a 15.6FT seiback if approved.
E3. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservatian and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship
mrghi resulc from the denial of the application
Subject property has an extraordinarily low lot coverage compared to its neighbors and has
a comparably smaller �ot area of 4140 sq ft when compared to the other lots on the block. If
denied, the subject property poses to lose a substantial gain of one covered parking space
and bedroom. I have a family of 4 and it would be very difficult to live in a 2 bedroom home
with no garage. I love f3urlingame and would love to live here and enlarge my existing home
rather than searching for another one. If approved there will still be a setback of 15.6Ft
which meets the setback requirement for a 1 single story home. This 15ft is 15ft more than
most my towering neighbors with mixed use structures. My elderly mother currently lives in
Mills Estates in Qurlingame and the hills are too difficult for her to walk up and down. If
approved my mother plans to live in this home, in the new addition bedroom, so she can
walk to Burlingame Ave and handte her day to day activities without the use of a taxi. She is
a 36 year resident of Burlingame. Homes are becoming more and more expensive and
getting 3 bedrooms out of this home would really help me financially and keep me in
Qurlingame for the rest of my life.
�"� �.. �' �. i �� 9� 0_.!
JU(_ 12 20i3
C�Tr oF BUR�_�ivG,4ME
CDQ-PLANNING DIV
Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in [he vicinity or to public health, safety, genera/ welfare or
con ven►ence.
The proposed project is to be used as a single family residential property. The subject
property will not be detrimental to the property in the vicinity to public health, safety,
general welfare, or convenience. If approved the home will still be 1/3 of the size of all of
the surrounding neighbors. This RC-zoned property will be just residential and will not
impact any neighboring businesses or homes. The proposed structure will improve visuals
from the California drive side because an old douglas fur deck and 100 year old fence
currently show on the California drive side of this home. If approved it the new bedroom
wili have modern siding, windows, and increase the cosmetic appeal of California drive. The
addition will simply replace the existing deck so no bigger footprints will exist. The home is
only one story so there will be no view impacts or eye soars.
D. How wi/l fhe proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k
and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in fhe
general vicinity?
The pr�posed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk, and character of
the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties. The proposed project will retain the
existing structures architectural features and shall not disturb California drives current
mixed use commercial massing, bulk, and character. Currently there is a deck where the
new bedroom wouid go. The roof line will simply be extending and the deck enclosed. The
same materials and siding will be used on the proposed addition and will match the rest of
the existing structure. The character of the neighborhood would not change because I
would only be adding another bedroom. The apartment complex need door (828 edgehill)
has over 9 bedrooms and the mixed use home other side (840 edgehill) has 5 bedrooms and
a hair salon. The aesthetics will improve because it does look odd now with such a small
home surrounded by so many large structures. The home was built in 1918 and I look
forward to replacing the rotted out deck, fences, an restoring its beauty.
t Ji �IDC w+ 3� �.tiu�ne 4 u"r 31.� fYa9
JUL 12 ZOf3
crrr o� Bur��wc�,ME
CDD-PLANNfNG DIV.
� T
�cr ��'
�,�1�.. �.
� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
� p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARIANCE APPLICATION
L 1 1 `r. .. � ;
�.,.R�
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
Subject property is in zoning district C-R. All other lots are either fully covered to the
property line or does not meet the minimum 20 feet rear setback requirement on
California Dr. Subject property is the only property on the block which is either not fully
covered to the property line and meets the 20 feet rear setback requirement.
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship mighf result from the denial of the application.
Subject property has an extraordinarily low lot coverage compared to its' neighbors and
has a comparably smaller lot area of 4140 sqft when compared to the other lots on the block.
If denied, the subject property poses to lose a substantial gain of one covered parking space
and increase habitable living space.
c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
The proposed project is to be used as a single family residential property. The subject
property will not be detrimental to property in the vicinity to public health, safety, general
welfare, or convenience.
d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity?
The proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk, and character of
the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties. The proposed project will retain the
existing structures architectural features and shall not disturb California Drive's current mixed
use commercial massing, bulk, and character.
Handouts\Variance Application.2008
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
Do any conditions exist on the site which make other alternatives to the variance impracticable or impossible and are
also not common to other properties in the area? For example, is there a creek cutting through the property, an
exceptional tree specimen, steep terrain, odd lot shape or unusual placement of existing structures? How is this
property different from others in the neighborhood?
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship might result form the denial of the application.
Would you be unable to build a project similar to others in the area or neighborhood without the exception? (i.e., having
as much on-site parking or bedrooms?) Would you be unable to develop the site for the uses allowed without the
exception? Do the requirements of the law place an unreasonable limitation or hardship on the development of the
property?
c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighboring properties or structures on those
properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting, paving,
landscaping sunlighUshade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance.
Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the public's health, safety or general welfare?
Pub/ic health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems,
water supply safety, and things which have the potential to affect public health (i.e., underground storage tanks, storage
of chemicals, situations which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseases).
Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protection? Will alarm systems or
sprinklers be installed? Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services (i.e.,
noise, unruly gatherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use of flammable or hazardous materials, or
potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removal).
General welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and
goals for conservation and development? Is there a social benefit?
Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this
site or adjacent sites)? Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderly or
handicapped?
d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinify.
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood? If it does not affect
aesthetics, state why. If changes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existing
architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the neighborhood? If a use will affect the way a
neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and
explain why it fits.
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to
the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation, etc. with other structures
in the neighborhood or area.
How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the
image or tone established by size, density of development and general pattern of land use. Will there be more traffic or
less parking available resulting from this use? If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why.
How will the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the general vicinity? Compare your
project with existing uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state why
your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity.
Handouts\Variance Application.2008
j�'il
�'s.`,1
,'�..
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
Lot Coverage >40%
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARIANCE APPLICATION
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
Subject property has an existing lot coverage of 39.2% without the mandatory covered parking
space. All other adjacent neighbors on the block are at a greater lot coverage of the 40%
allowed and have multiple covered parking spaces.
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary
hardship might result from the denial of the application.
Subject property is the only property on the block which does not have a covered parking space
and increased lot coverage. Without the variance, the property owner will not be able to fully
enjoy their property as their neighbors would.
c.
Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinify or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
Subject property is only a residential property and shall not effect the commercial nature
of California Dr.
d. How will the proposed project be compatible wifh the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity?
The proposed project will match existing aesthetics and shall not disrurb California Dr's current
commercial massing, bulk, and character.
Handouts\Variance Application.2008
D. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k
and character of the existing and potentiaJ uses on adjoining properties in the
general vicinity?
The proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk, and character of
the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties. The garage will be in the back of the
property and will be a moderr� structure. Looking at most of the homes on Edgehilf Rd, the
majorit�i of the garage� are detached garages in the Same rear area of the lot that I am
proposing. The garage will have the look and aapearance of a detached garage, it will just be
very close to the rear of the huuse due to the abnormaliy small lot and slope. If approved,
having this garage will match the character of the rest of the neighborhood and the City of
E3urlingame because it will ha��e a covered parking spot just like everyone else. Every house
on Ed�ehill Rd. has either an attached or detached garage and if approved it will match all
other similar homes
� � �.. '"r� � ,, � ,. � i�t
�u� 12 zo�3
CIT( OF BURLWGAME
CQD-PLANNING DfV.
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.or�
�� CITY p
� �
BURLINGAME
�
�;..
CITY nF BURLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
%����
11 � ;. ,
� �� „�
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code
Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making
the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink.
Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new
construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the
existing street and neighborhood.
The proposed project will not affect the neighborhood properties at California Dr.
The neighborhood does not have any cohesive defining properties that may
be affected by the proposed project.
2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of
the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existirtg structure, street
and neighborhood.
The proposed project will maintain the neighborhood character as the existing
structures architectural features are to remain and be extended to the new structure.
Roof lines, facades, and exterior finishes shall be matched with existing features and
materials.
3. How will the proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines
adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)?
The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines as it
provides 1 minimally required covered parking space, in which the property is
currently deficient.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or
addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements. What
�nitigation is proposed for the removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is
appropriate.
The proposed project will not be removing any trees located with the new footprint
of the new structure. sPECPERM.FRM
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790
www.burlin ag me.org
1. Explain why the blend of mass, scale and dominant structural characteristics of the new
construction or addition are consistent with the existing structure's design and with the
existing street and neighborhood.
How will the proposed structure or addition affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties
will not be affected, state why. Compare the proposed addition to the mass, scale and characteristics of neighboring properties. Think
about mass and bulk, landscaping, sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties. Neighboring properties and structures include
those to the right, left, rear and across the street.
How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk? If there is no change to the structure, say
so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area.
2. Explain how the variety of roof line, facade, exterior finish materials and elevations of
the proposed new structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street
and neighborhood.
How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with structures or uses in the existing neighborhood? If it does not affect
aesthetics, state why. Was the addition designed to match existing architecture and/or pattern ofdevelopment on adjacent properties in
the neighborhood? Explain why your proposal fits in the neighborhood.
How will the structure or addition change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by
size, density of devefopment and general pattern of land use. [fyou don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why.
3. How will t/ze proposed project be consistent with the residential design guidelines
adopted by tlze city?
Following are the design criteria adopted by the City Council for residential design review. How does your project meet these
guidelines?
1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood;
2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure;
4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and
5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components.
4. Explain how the remova! of any trees located within tl:e footprint of any new structure
or addition is necessary and is consistent with the city's reforestation requirements.
What mitigation is proposed for t/ie removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation
is appropriate.
Will any trees be removed as a result ofthis proposal? If so, explain what type of trees will be removed and if any are protected under
city ordinance (C.S. 11.06), why it is necessary to remove the trees, and what is being proposed to replace any trees being removed. If
no trees are to be removed, say so.
SPECPERM.FRM
���
x,
� :�.
�
r ������ � ��
�u� 11 �� ;
REAR ELEVATION VIEW AT CALIFORNIA DR
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNING DN.
0
- - - --- -- -
824 EDGEHILL DR 828 EDGEHILL DR 832 EDGEHILL DR 840 EDGEHILL DR 844 EDGEHILL DR
FRONT ELEVATION VIEW AT EDGEHILL DR
� �,�_::
,;�
� >
� .�
r_ �' "��,.
. r � ,�s... � r � .
' � �'a� .a��ral�Ktini# a�i?-.. �f`.:{ 7 ,....
8%
S '
h ;
. I�.�� ���� 4y4 . �:��`- i � �4
. �,� ' i� �
� ��..� .��� ,.��: ��
� �
��u � .
844 EDGEHILL DR
840 EDGEHILL DR
832 EDGEHILL DR
828 EDGEHILL DR
�� '� -
��
s.� � --
824 EDGEHILL DR
� 9���� �r �.�'
JUL 11 �u.;
CITY OF BURLINGAME
CDD-PLANNit�'G DIV.
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
August 22, 2013
0 Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
and Rear Setback Variances for a second story addition to an
existing single family dwelling and new detached garage at 832
Edgehill Drive, zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
No further comments.
All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 7-12-2013 will apply to this
project.
Reviewed
: 8-23-2013
Date:
To:
From:
Project Comments
� Engineering Division � Fire Division
(650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
Setback Variance for a second story addition and new attached
garage to an existing single-family dwelling at 832 Edgehill Drive,
zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building
Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California
Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing
Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the
Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on
December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California
Building Codes.
2) On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full
scale.
3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy
Efficiency Standards.
Go to http://www.enerqv.ca.qov/title24/2008standards/ for publications and
details.
,���Place the following information on the first page of the plans:
"Construction Hours"
Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
(See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.)
��On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that
require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for
these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning
Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must
submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job
Copy of the plans prior to performing the work.
6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame
business license.
7) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries,
the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site
parking.
9) Provide existing and proposed elevations.
10)Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be
demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project
approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work
can begin (including the removal of � building components), until a
Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is
responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed.
11)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed
property lines
12)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures.
13)Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the
�roperty line. (PWE letter dated 8-17-88)
4 dicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the
property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table
602)
,i15 Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or
door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the
net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the
elevation drawin s.
16 dicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the
Department of Public Works.
17)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at
any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the
Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in
height.
18)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
19)Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically
address items 4, 5, 14, 15, and 16 must be re-submitted before this project can
move forward for Planning om ission action.
!.,_.._._. _�__=__.
___,._.._
Reviewech�bq-.�`"' ,----
7-12-2013
; CBO
{-7270
\ , .. ..: . .a.
:
Date:
To:
X Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
From:
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
Setback Variance for a second story addition and new attached
garage to an existing single-family dwelling at 832 Edgehill Drive,
zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
1. The proposed garage appears to be constructed within one foot of property
line which requires a property boundary survey by a licensed land
surveyor/engineer.
2. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the
City storm drain system.
3. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter.
4. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 8/15/2013
Project Comments
Date:
To:
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
❑X Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
From:
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
Setback Variance for a second story addition and new attached
garage to an existing single-family dwelling at 832 Edgehill Drive,
zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
No comments at this time.
Reviewed by: ��
Date: ��z'� 113
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
August 30, 2013
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
and Rear Setback Variances for a second story addition to an
existing single family dwelling and new detached garage at 832
Edgehill Drive, zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
1. No further Comments.
Reviewed by: BD
Date: 9/4113
Project Comments
Date:
August 22, 2013
To: � Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
From: Planning Staff
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
aiiu RCi3i �Ciu3�i� �'�iii�i ii,:�� fuP a��i:ui iu �iiii ji �u�iiiui i i�i ai �
existing single family dwelling and new detached garage at 832
Edgehill Drive, zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
' ? � v� �s ��r�
f'
-- ,
i�� G�.ux� �-� --e �i� �dd o S`� �- z
�/
�? Z-���:�-� ��,t.c,s- G�-� �e��`su�' �:'�-�- u. c�# C u� cl s c�
c�j,�� �Q iru�� ll� Co�� � •
������
3• �u � ���'c�.�-- � �� � `�e.� G�'G�'G� ���s��L�.
�'�'�
�2`rf2'�iiict� iiji: ��
QSi�:
S �Z��r3
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(ssa) s5s-72so
X Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning StafF
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
0 City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
Setback Variance for a second story addition and new attached
garage to an existing single-family dwelling at 832 Edgehill Drive,
zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
• 1. If Public Works requires sidewalk replacement, Policy for Expanding Width
of Planter Strip needs to be implemented
f .. -F .
` �2��`s per requirements, landscape plan must include 1 landscape tree (non-fruit
�--'bearing) per 1000 SF of livings space.
Reviewed by: B Disco
Date: 7I18/13
Date:
To:
From:
Project Corr�ments
� Engineering Division 0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
X Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
Setback Variance for a second story addition and new attached
garage to an existing single-family dwelling at 832 Edgehill Drive,
zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's
NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction
activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and
effective BMPs during all phases of construction, including demolition. When
submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project
notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project
proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this
requirement. Electronic file is available for download at:
http://www.flowstobay.org/documents/business/construction/Countywide_Program_B
MP_Plan_Sheet Jun2012.pdf
2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using
architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer
"Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at:
http://www.flowstobay.org/documents/municipalities/nd/Materials/2012%20Materials/
Architectural_copper_BMPs_FINAL.pdf
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727
Reviewed by: SD �% Date: 7/15/13
. 2�'
- . IR�...�
,
�-�
Sk� MATEO COUNTYWIOE
Water Pollution
Prevention Program
Clean Watec Heal:hy Community.
Construction Best Mana ement '
g Pract�ces (BMPs)
Construction projects are required to implement the stormwater best management practices (BMP) on this page,
as they apply to your project, a11 year ]ong,
Materials & VVaste i�Ianagement
Nao-Razallous MatcrL�1�
�&�m and co�rr slockpiles of sand, dirt or othcr construcuon mamrinl
"'ith re�Ps when .ain is forecasi or ifnoi xtively being used �vithin
14 d:ns.
❑ Ux (but don't ovenac) reclaimcd n•atcr for dus� conlrol.
aaaMous Msterials
� Lalkl all M1.�`dous matcrials nnd Im>ardous �vasics (s�ch ac
pesucides, paints, �inners. solvenes, fueL oil, nnd antifrcezc) in
e�coNanm with cih•. wunry. sra�c and kdaal regulatioi�s.
❑ Store hamrdo��s maleriaLs and �vastes in water ught con�aincrs, swre
� aPpmprialc sccondary conlainmrnt, and covcr Ihem a[ Ihc cnd of
e�•cre a�ork day or during wet weather onnc�n rain is forecost.
❑ Follme man� u�rcr's applicalion iiuwctia�s for h�ardous
��Is and be carcfW mt m uu morc than nzcessarv. po not
apply chemicals ouldoors when rain is forecase wi�hin .'4 hours.
0 Artange for appmpriete disposal ofall hazvdous �vastes.
Waste Managanfnt
O Cmcr w�am> dispow� coalaincro sccurelp .�•ith iefps at Ihc cnd of
everc acorF; doy and during we� wpther.
❑ C6eel u•xsm dispos�l comainers {rzq������. for leal:s and �o maAe
��n' �^a� a�'efilled. Ne�er hox do�rn a dumpner on the
cons¢uuion sire.
❑ Clean or replacc �onable toilcts. aud i��spen tlmm Gcquentlp For
kaks and spiLLs,
❑ Dispose of all wastes mid dcbris pmperk. Ren�cle mamrials a�
N-%s[es tlw� can be ren�cled (sucM1 as azphalt. co�rele. asgrcgaie bau
mnlerials, w•oad gvp boerd. P�Pe, cec.)
❑ Dispose u[�y�id residaa t m pain�s, �inners. solvrn6, glues, and
ckanu'g 9nids as huardous �r:�ste.
Conslcvcpa� Emry�c�, AnJ PerimMv
❑ FslablisM1 and moinmin eFTective perimeler controls aiM srabilirc alt
�°'��tio� uh'unces nnd c.vrs �u yv(5c�cn��y �p�pol emsion and
Rdm�ent diuherga from site and trackins off sire.
❑ S�vecp or a�acuum ar�• shxet uacking immediatch• and mcure
sediment mmce to preven[ further Ir�cking. Ne�er hose donn streets
to <I�nn up trecking.
Equipment Management &
Spill Control
., �
Main[coancc anA puking
❑ Decig�lc an aRa, 5tted �vith appmpriate BMP; for
vehicle and equipment parl,in6 md sto'age.
� Pcrfortn major maintenance, repairjobs, and vehicle
and cquipmen[ w¢shing off site.
❑ 1f refueling or vehicle mainteosnce must be done
onsilc. �vod: in a bcm�ed arp a.var fiom s[o`m d�ains
nnd ovcr n driP pen big rnough lo collcct liuids.
Recycle or dis�os� of 8uids u hazardaus iv;�cte.
❑ IF vehicle or equipmrnt clwning m¢q� y� �� a��R,
clenn xitL.ea�ac onk in a 6enuxd aren thet wi11 not
allo�v rinse water ro nm in(o gurters. streelz sm+m
- dfL015, pf SIQ�LCC u•altt3,
❑ Do ml clean vehidc or eqnipment o�uite asn� sosps,
mh�rnLs. degrenaers. srcam cleannig equipmenl etc.
Spill Pmrnrion anA Contml
� KecP sp7l clwuup materials (rsgs, absorben�v, etc.)
�'ailablc at thc rnnshuction silc a� all timcs.
❑ Inspect.ehiclesandequipmentfrequendyforand
�epair IeoI3 p�omplly. Uu drip pena ro mtch Iml;s
until repnirs are modc.
� Clean up apills or kaks immWi�hW a�d disppx of
clwnup matviaLs ploperlr.
O Da not Irox down surfac s ixhne Buida he�e spilled
[fu dn• eleonup melhods (absor6cnl matedals. wt
littcr, nnd/or ra�cs),
❑ Swcep up spiltcd M� mhlcrials immediatelp. Do no1
m' [o wash them ea�ay wiW water, or bury them.
❑ Clenn up spills m dirt ateas bv digging up nnd
pmperly disposuig of conmminated soJ.
❑ RCPOrt SIe1116CdpI SplUSIIp�ICdjpty�Y. YW M RQ{IRd
m� law lo rtport all si�i6eant �eleasei pf he�rdous
atcriel; including oil. To (cpon e spill: I) Die19l I
or your Iocel emergrnn� �espanse number, n Call tLe
Goiemor's O�ce of Emexgrncp Sen�ias Waming
Crn�er. (8f10) 832-7550 (2� hours).
Storm drain
Earth�vork &
Contaminated
Soils
�����r � � '
� '` � °
� � _7f r F .. '�
6i,,, .. �� = m
Emvon Cootrol
� ���dW� 6+ading and ecca�atim �rort Cor
dq� wealher only.
❑ Smbiliu all dcnuded areas, insrp7l end
mawrnu tempoary eros�un wntrols (such
as ttosion wotrol frbric or bondtd fibtt
m�nir) un01 vegcmrion is esmblished
� SeW or plant rxgerauoa fw emsion
wntrol on slopes or x�heee construcrion is
m[ immediatc�y plenncd
Suliment Cvntrol
❑ Pmtett storm drein inlcts, guUers. ditcltes.
and dlainege rou+xs with appmPriate
BMPs, suc6 az�avd bag, fiber m(Is,
bemu, efC.
❑ Prcvurtsedimcntfrommigratmgoffsitc
by installingaM maintaining sedimrnt -
coutrols. sueh ac fiber folls, silt 4nces. or
scdimrnt basins.
� Kcep c<eavand soil on thc sim w�hcre it
�rill oot colleu imo [he s�e�
❑ Tfaosfer cxcavelcd maocriek [o dump
wcks on tl¢ site, no[ in tl�e shttt.
❑ Conraminntcd Soils
❑ 1tem� of the folloxing condium�s are
obsenad, test far umruninsrion end
coa4ct �he Regionel Watv Qualitv
ConnolBoerd: �
■ Unusml mil ronditioas. discobration,
rn odor.
� Abandoixd imdc�ouni{ �s,
■ Abandoned wells
■ Bwicd bertels. d�6ris. or aash.
PavinglAsphalt Work
❑ 4�oid paving and su�l waring in w�et
mea��er, or x�hen mu� �s finecaci before
�msh pa�xmun �rill ha�•c iimc m cure.
❑ Cocu stomi drain inlets nnd manholes
whcu applying sesl coeL uck eoati slum�
seal, fog sea4 ea.
O Copec[ and recycle or appropriatdp
d�spos ofexcess abrnsi�e gra�el ar sand.
Do NOT sn�eep or wash i1 into gutters.
O Dp not ¢se xate to �cash do��n fresh
asphal[ concrel� pavement
San•cutting & AsphaltlConcrMe Remoral
0 Completely co�v or borsicade smnn
drein iNe[s whrn sa�r euuing. Usc fillcr
fabric, wtch besin inld filters. or gra�•cl
Gags fo Lxcp sl� out of tl�c stom� drain
rymm.
❑ Shovel, abowrb, onvcuwn saw•cuc
slum m�d disposc of all wa+rc as soon
es yoa am finish W in onc localion or e�
the e� oCwch work day (n•hicheca is
soona!).
❑ ff sawrout slurry• enmrs a ratch basi2 clean
it �ry'vnmcdialcl�•.
Concrete, Grout & iVlortar
Application
- ,,.
�� �
❑ Srom concrc�c, gom and monar undcr
w�er. ou pallels and mvay Bom dwinage
arcas. These mareriaLs n�usi never rcach a
slmm dain.
❑ Wesh om ca�e¢ic equipmcavwcls
affsirc or in a contalucd arca, so thuc
is no discharge inro �he undedeing mil
aronwsur�w���ngafcas Lciconc�c
harden and dispose of as garbage.
❑ Collcct ihe ��asl� n�atcr from wasl�ing
e�ppsW aggregme wMrc�c a�d remo��c ii
for app�opriate disposal offsi�e.
Dewatering
.Y�;.., �, f
Y�
L
_ .r � � �\
�.�' }J
.t'� �-C.1
❑ ElTccli�xlr managc all runon all
noRivithin �he si�c. and alI rwiolT�hai
disvhargcs from Wc si�c Di.�cn run.an
o�ntcr from oRsitc au�ac from all dismrbcd
areus or oWen��u enswe compliance.
❑ �4Tcn dc�t�atcnng. noiif � and obiain
appro�al frdn the Iocal mwicipoli��
bcfolc disclurginp n-a�cr io a succi guucr
or s�om� drain. Fil�ation or dii�crsion
th�ougL a 6uin. tanY,. ar sediment o-�p
may be �cqnired.
❑[n areu of kno r conuminatioq tes�ing
is mquircd pdor �o rq�sc or disclurgc of
groundmolcr. Consult wi� Wc Enginccr �o
delelminc whethv testing is ¢pu'ved and
haw �o imcrprei fcsulcs. Coniamimicd
e„�ound�rmcr musi yc pce�d nr hanlyd
o6-siic for proper d'uposnl.
lluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per dav!
Painfing & paint Removai
^= ` .,:•_ �, :;:�:� �
� ,
�
:,..
� -
ti.
`
Painting cleanup
❑ Ne�•cr cican bn�shcs or rinse paini
contomcrs in�o a sucet, gu¢cr, slorm
drain orsudeccwalcrs
❑ For �ra�crkazcd pmnts, painl oui 6mshcs
�o Jic cqrni possiblc. Rinm io �hc
sanitnq• screcr on« vou hnce g,incd
pcnnission from Wc local wastncmv
tream�cm auWariry. Nci�cr pa�r paim
doien o droin.
❑ For oil-bamd paiutc. puim om brushcs io
�hc e>icm possible and eleon w�i�h ihinncr
or sal•�m� in a proper wmainer. Filler w�d
¢e ihi�mcrs and sol.�cn�s. Dizposc af
�esidue and unnsablc �h;nner/sol.xms as
lu �ous �vasic.
Painf rtmural
❑ Chemieal paim svipping residuc and
�ips and dus� Gom ninrinc paints or
painls wnmining Icod or tributrltin musi
bc disposcd ofas ha>ardous wasic.
❑ Poin� cLips and durt ffom non-hamrdous
dn� so-ipping and s nd blaring may y�
swep� up or wllcucd in ptyciic dmp
clod�s nnd dispouA ofas wsh.
Landscape Ntateriats
( �'"
�' -- /r��F�t��
..�::: :�;;;'
❑ Connin stockpiled Iandseaping maicrinls
bc staring J�em undcr �urps a�hen �hn� are
activtl.� bcu�g used.
❑ S�ick crodiblc Iondsupc mmcrial on
palleu. Co�•cr or slorc Ji � malcrials
n�hen Ihcy nrc noi acrivel.• being uscd or
npplicd.
❑ Discontinue appliwtion af�iy �iblc
landscapc mutcrinl �ci��in 2 days Mfore a
fa�c�u� rain crcm or durin6 ��r� ���caJ¢r.
�
SAN MA'� EOC(!lJNTYNIOE
Wate�Po��ution
�rever�t�on Program
[le��wacer- Xi�Khytommunny.
Requirements for Architectural Copper
Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing!
Gopper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life
Copper can harm aquatic life in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes
info contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts,
especially during instaliation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination
solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown
typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to
remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants.
N! unicipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the
in sfaliation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper.
U se Best Management Practices (BMPs)
The following Best Management Practices (BMPs)
discharges to storm drains.
Building with copper
gutter and drainpipe.
must be implemented to prevent prohibited
During Installation
• If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory.
• If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs:
o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the
rinse water does not flow to fhe street or storm drain.
Block off storm drain inlet if needed.
o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump to the sanitary
sewer. Contact your local� sanitary sewer agency before
discharging to the sanitary sewer.
o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for
proper disposaL
• Consider coating the copper materials with an impervious
coating that prevents further. corrosion and runoff. This will
also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring
less maintenance.
During Maintenance
Implement the following BMPs during routine maintenance activities, such as power washing the roof,
re-patination or re-appiication of impervious coating;
• Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains.
• Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local
sanifary sewer agency). If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal,
Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself!
ff you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non-
stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treating or washing
copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal
siormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine.
Contact Information
The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at
www.flowstobay.ora (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency").
F/NAL February 29, 2012
prohibited discharge. The water must be
pumped and disposed of proper/y.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, VARIANCES
AND SPECIAL PERMIT
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for
Design Review, Side and Rear Setback Variances and Special Permit for a first floor addition
(considered two-story at the rear of the house) and a new attached qarage at 832 Edqehill
Drive, zoned C-R, Marc Maniscalco, 2818 Las Piedras Drive, Burlinaame, CA, 94010, property
owner, APN: 029-022-110;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
October 15, 2013, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written
materials and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and
comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is
no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on
the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 (e)(1)
of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt
from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more
than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition, is hereby approved.
2. Said Design Review, Variances and Special Permit are approved subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review,
Variances and Special Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of
said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official
records of the County of San Mateo.
Chairman
I,
Burlingame, do
regular meeting
following vote:
, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a
of the Planning Commission held on the 15th dav of October, 2013 by the
Secretary
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for
Permit.
832 Edgehill Drive
Effective October 25, 2013
Categorical Exemption, Design Review, Variances and Special
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division
date stamped October 2, 2013, sheets A1 through A6, BMP and GB1;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features,
roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to
Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined
by Planning staffl;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this
permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's August 23 and July 12, 2013 memos,
the City Engineer's August 15, 2013 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 24, 2013 memo, the
City Arborist's September 4, August 26 and July 18, 2013 memos, and the Stormwater
Coordinator's July 17, 2013 memo shall be met;
5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project
shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community
Development Director;
6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall
be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District;
7. that prior to issuance of
construction plans shall
approval adopted by the
remain a part of all se
Compliance with all con
not be modified or chan
Council on appeal;
a building permit for construction of the project, the project
be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of
Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall
ts of approved plans throughout the construction process.
ditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall
ged without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City
8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and
that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued;
9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects
to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full
demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform
Fire Codes, 2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for
Permit.
832 Edgehill Drive
Effective October 25, 2013
Page 2
Categorical Exemption, Design Review, Variances and Special
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural
certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be
evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the
approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with
approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing
inspection shall be scheduled; and
12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has
been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
, CITY OF BURLINGAME
, ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BURLlNGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
� ` ` BURLINGAME, CA 94010
' � �; — PH: (650) 558-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790
www.burlingame.org
Site: 832 EDGEHILL DRIVE
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the
following public hearing on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15,
2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the fity Hall Council (hambers, 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, (A:
Application for Design Review, Side and Rear Setback
Voriances and Special Permit far a first floor addition
(considered to be two-story at the rear of the house) and
a new attached garage at 832 EDGEHILL DRIVE zoned
R-l. APN 029-022-110
Mailed: October 4, 2013
(Please refer to other side)
PilBLIC HEARING
NOTICE
Clf�[ Of BUd"lltlq�llle
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to
the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the public hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Development Director
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
(Please refer to ofher side)
Item No. 8
Design Review Study
PROJECT LOCATION
832 Edgehill Drive
1 M '
'� �;^
' '� � �' Item No. 8
�'�` City of Burlingame Design Review Study
Design Review, Variances and Special Permit
Address: 832 Edgehill Drive Meeting Date: September 23, 2013
Request: Application for Design Review, Side and Rear Setback Variances and Special Permit for first floor
addition (considered two-story at the re�r of the house) and a new attached garage.
Applicant and Designer: Donald Yu, Yuflux Engineering LLC
Property Owner: Marc Maniscalco
General Plan: Low Density Residential '
APN: 029-022-110
Lot Area: 4077 SF
Zoning: C-R
Summary: The subject property is a through lot uvith frontages on Edgehill Drive and California Drive. It is
substandard in size (4077 SF existing where 5000 SF is required) and width (45'-0" existing where 50'-0" is
required). Pedestrian and vehicular access is pro�iided only on Edgehill Drive. The subject property is zoned
C-R (Commercial-Residential), which encourages a mixed residential-commercial land use with pedestrian
oriented retail uses compatible with residential us2s. However, since the existing and proposed use on the
property is a single family dwelling, the project is subject to the R-1 District development guidelines (Chapter
25.26). For development purposes, the front of the� lot is considered to be along Edgehill Drive.
The existing single family dwelling contains 1,450 SF (0.35 FAR) of floor area and has two bedrooms.
Currently, there is no existing covered parking on the site, only uncovered parking spaces in an existing
driveway. The County Assessor's Appraisal Report indicates that at some point a detached single-car garage
existed at the rear of the site (no date provided on appraisal report). It is not known when the previously
existing detached garage was removed.
The existing house is single story. However, due to the downward slope towards California Drive there is a
large crawl space at the rear of the house. The mass and bulk at the rear of the house is that of a two-story
structure, therefore the proposed addition at the rear is subject to design review and second floor setback
requirements. With this application, the applicant is proposing an 80 SF second floor addition and a new 235
SF attached single-car garage at the rear of the house. With the proposed addition, the floor area will
increase to 1,813 SF (0.44 FAR) where the zonin� code allows a maxim�m of 2,405 SF (0.59 FAR). The
proposed project is 592 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The proposed addition requires several
applications and exceptions to the code which are listed below.
With the addition, the number of potential bedrooms will increase from two to three. Two parking spaces, one
of which must be covered, are required on site. The proposed attached garage (10'-0" x 20'-0" clear interior
dimensions) provides one code-compliant covere�� parking space for the proposed three-bedroom house.
One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been
met. The applicant is requesting the following applications:
■ Design Review for a first floor addition to an existing single family dwelling (considered two-story at the
rear of the house) and a new attached garage (C.S. 25.57.010 (a) (2) and (a) (6));
■ Side Setback Variance for an addition along the left side property line (2'-9" existing and proposed
where 4'-0" is the minimum required) (C.S. 2.5.26.072 (c) (1));
■ Side and Rear Setback Variances for a pr��posed attached garage (0'-0" proposed where 4'-0" and
15'-0" are required along the right side and rear property lines, respectively) (C.S. 25.26.070 (c) (1)
and (d) (1));
■ Rear Setback Variance for an addition at the rear of the house (13'-0" proposed to the second floor
where 20'-0" is the minimum required to the second floor) (C.S. 25.26.072 (d) (2));
■ Lot Coverage Variance for an addition to an existing single family dwelling and new attached garage
(1915 SF, 46.9% proposed where 1631 SF, 40% is the maximum allowed) (C.S. 25.26.065); and
■ Special Permit for a new attached single-car garage (C.S. 25.26.035 (a)).
Design Review, Variances and Special Permit
832 Edgehill Drive
832 Edgehill Drive
Lot Area: 4077 SF Plans Date Stam ed: Au ust 30, 2013
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQUIRED
SETBACKS '
( ... .._...... �.......,_ ...._._............_........__._.......___.......,._ ............................_....._.................. ........................__.................__......._...........g........................................._..................._..._......_..........................................................._............._......._....._g_........._..
Fronf 1st flr :' 19 -9 no chan e 15'-0" or block avera e
(2nd flr): ; n/a n/a 20'-0"
�
_ ....................................... . ..._............... ................... _. ..............................._....................................._............................................................... ...._... ...................................................................._.........................................................._....
_ ......................_................................................. ............................._......... ....... .._..... ...
Side (left): : 2'-9" ' 2'-9" Z 4'-0"
(right): 11'-2" 0'-0" to attached garage 3 4'-0"
: _
_ ........................................................................_................................................................._.........................................................................................................................................
..................................................................._.................................................................................. ......... .
Rear (1st flr): 15'-6" 0'-0" to attached garage 5 15'-0"
2nd flr 15'-6" 4 13'-0" 6 20'-0"
( )� :
. :
_ ............................................................................. .... .. ......_. _..........................................................................._._.................._...................
. ......... ............................. .... ... .. ..... .. .. ... ... .. .. . ... ..... .
Lot Coverage: ; 1600 SF 1915 SF 1631 SF
39.2% 46.9%' 40%
....................___..... _............. ..................;._....................�............................ ......_......._.................__...........:_ .._---......_.._....___..._.._.._ ............---..._......._....---._................................_:...__..._...._..........._..._.._.__...._.................._..._........---....._..._._._...._.......
FAR: : 1450 SF 1813 SF 2405 SF 8
0.35 FAR 0.44 FAR 0.59 FAR
_ ..............................._..................._.......................................................................,........................................................._........................_..................._..._.................._.._..............------......__..._..._..__............_............._............_.............._..__._........_..............--- --..
# of bedrooms: ; 2 3 ---
_.............._ .................._................................................_............._.........;........._........................_..-------..__................................................................__............................---._....._.....__......----...._.._.._.._......------........_......_........_.:_........_...._....__........_..------ -----......._..._.._._...._..............................
Off-Street Parking: ; 0 covered 9 1 covered 1 covered
�� o�-o°� X 20�-0°°� �� o�-o�° X 20�-0°��
1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered
(9'-0" x 20'-0") (9'-0" x 20'-0") (9'-0" x 20'-0")
---......._... _._.........._......_..--- ...............__._.. ...._........__....._._..... _........_.................._......_. __.._.......__._. _.............._..._.......----........._...__.._....._._..._........_..__............_.._.._................................_........:...__..__............................................................_........_............_.........................................
Height: 15'-5" 15'-5" 30'-0"
__...__._.........._.......__ ............._......__......__.._........---.._.,_........._........_...........- ---.........._......._.....................__..................._._........................................_................._......................_..........._....................................................._................................_......................_...........................__..........................................
DH Envelope: : n/a complies with DHE CS 25.26.075
' Existing nonconforming left side setback (2'-9" existing where 4'-0" is the minimum required).
2 Side Setback Variance required for an addition along the left side property line (2'-9" existing and
proposed where 4'-0" is the minimum required).
3 Side Setback Variance required for a proposed attached garage (0'-0" proposed where 4'-0" is the
minimum required.)
4 Existing nonconforming second floor rear setback (15'-6" existing where 20'-0" is the minimum required).
5 Rear Setback Variance required for a proposed attached garage (0'-0" proposed where 15'-0" is the
minimum required).
6 Rear Setback Variance required for an addition at the rear of the house (13'-0" proposed where 20'-0" is
the minimum required to the second floor).
' Lot Coverage Variance for an addition to an existing single family dwelling and new attached garage
(1915 SF, 46.9% proposed where 1631 SF, 40% is the maximum allowed).
$ (0.32 x 4077 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2405 SF (0.59 FAR)
9 Existing nonconforming off-street parking (currently there is no covered parking on site).
Staff Comments: See attached comments from the Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, City Engineer,
Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator.
Ruben Hurin
Senior Planner
c. Donald Yu, Yuflux Engineering LLC, applicant and designer
2
Design Review, Variances and Special Permit
Attachments:
Application to the Planning Commission
Variance Applications
Special Permit Application
Photographs of Neighborhood
Staff Comments
Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed September 13, 2013
Aerial Photo
832 Edgehill Drive
3
�,��
BURLINGAME
, �"
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Type of application:
Design Review
❑ Conditional Use Permit
�Variance ❑ Parcel #: �Z� � � � � " � � �
Special Permit ❑ Other:
PROJECTADDRESS: �jJ2 �'J��l-ll�l YII�
O Please indicate the contact person for this project
APPLICANT project contact person� PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑
OK to send electronic copies of documents OK to send electronic copies of documents ❑
Name:
�j�� � Name: a rC I�'�.i� lSC'Gtt �iU
Address: ���I � 1���� �v� Address: 2 V�� � S Pi cd r� s� i
City/State/Zip: �t� ��i�,C��� � t��- ��Z� City/State/Zip: �`^� << ��IQh"{- C � q y�o�n,_
Phone: �U��U-�O�UZ
Fax: q�ri �°��g�q-6��
E-mail: �7y�1 °' yuI�LV1X, CiW1 _
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact personk(`
OK to send electronic 5opies of documents I,
Name
Phone: �' V � Z� � �j �S
Fax:
E-mail: �4�I�C- YV1GtV�iSCa�(.l) �Y�0�4 �•GOWj
Address: � �Q � �I��i �✓���
City/State/Zip: � ���,��o � � ��Z�
Phone: �-0�j�(� �� �Z
Fax: 4�� � ��0�-���
E-mail: ]��IN.`�' �i�1�-u���
,k Burlingame Business License #: ��g � 3
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NCLUS� Y�G� �"�C ��12� C`'N�rt �� ���✓���� �R��
�1��12aNTR� ��TI.s��1� �-fi 12�Pr1� PrP�i2u�C 2'�l�`' •��G'► 1�I�ir�1 ('�v��
�$-�K�I � �RG� P�1" I��Y�
AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I here ertify under enalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
Applicant's signature: Date: �� 13
I am aware of the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning
Commission. /� _
Property owner's signature: Date: � �� I���
Date submitted: 7f �� t �-�
* Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the
Finance Department at the time application fees are paid.
❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s:�Halloours�Pcappiicot;on zoos.hondo�r.doc
Variance Appl cation for OFT setback for covered parking.
A. Describe rhe exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your
property which do not apply tu other properties in this area.
All horr�es in Burlingame are required to have covered parking. There used to be a single car
garUge at 832 edgehill when onf� looks at 2010 google maps. It was an older structure that was
rerr�ovec: by the bank before selling the property in 2012. It was removed by the banl< to make
tf�e property look more appealing. The old garage was right on the property line just like the
propose+� garage. The subject property has an unusually small lot and there is no other place to
put a covered parking garage. A detached garage is olc �vith the owner but it is just not possible
with the abnormally small lot tc be considered detached by the City of Burlingame code. The
minirnum requirements for the garage are 20ft x lOft. Even if a 20x10 garage was placed at the
rear E�ro:�erty line with a OFT se-bacl< it would not be far enough away from the house to be
corisidered a detached garage. I�lease note that the proposed garage will not be attached to the
home it will just be very close. l here will be no entry to the garage from the house.
E3. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoymenr of a
substantial property righi anc� what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship
rniyht result frorn the denial of the application
Subject property has an extraordinarily low lot coverage compared to its neighbors and has
a comparably smaller lot area of 4140 sq ft �vhen compared to the other lots on the block. It
is a requirement to have encl��sed parl<ing and right now the home is not complying with
this Burlin�;ame Code. I wish t�� have � parl<ing garage so my mother can park her car in a
s��fe placc�. T�herc� are rnany apartment complexes on Edgehill road and it can sometimes be
difflcult to park on the street. Also I plan on purchasing my mother a Nissan Leaf, 100%
electric c�r, and it would neec to be parked inside so we can charge it for her every night.
C. Explain why the proposed use ar the proposed location wi11 not be detrimental or injurious
to property or irnprovements in rhe vicinity or to public health, safety, generaf welfare or
cor►ven�ence.
The proposed project �vill noi cause any detrimental or injurious factors to public health,
safety, general vrelfare or convenience. The proposed project simply adds covered parking
bacl< to the home. This will irr�prove the neighborhood because it will open up more parking
to :he rest of the community. The house �viil also be in compliance and match the other
homes in the area. The proposed �arage �vill be a simple 20FT X 10FT garage suitable for 1
car.
� �; �
�.� _� .. _ :. � ,�,.x�
,1�1►_ 1 � 20i3
CI [Y OF EURL1f��AME
CDD-PL.F,�INING D1V.
�� ; i l
.�`'��
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARIANCE APPLICATION
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your property which do not apply fo other properties in this area.
Subject property has an existing side setback of 1'-8" at the rear. Adjacent neighbors on the block
are all built out to 0'-0" side setbacks, or have projections from the main structure out to the
property line.
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property /oss or unnecessary
hardship might result from the denial of the application.
Subject property's floor area is low compared with it's neighbors on the block. Having the 1'-8"
setback at the left side property line would help better utilize the property into a more usable
habitable space.
c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
Subject property is only a residential property and shall not effect the commercial nature
of California Dr.
d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthefics, mass, bu/k and
character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity?
The proposed project will match existing aesthetics and shall not disturb California Dr's
current commercial massing, bulk, and character.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O'I PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
Left Side Property Line Setback < 4'-0"
Handouts\Variance Application.2008
Variance Application for less than 20FT rear setback.
A. Destribe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your
property which do not apply to other properties in this area.
The subject property is in zoning district C-R. All other lots are either fully covered to the
property line or does not meet the minimum 20ft rear setback requirement on California drive.
Neighboring properties are either massive apartment buildings with 4+ units or Duplex's with
connecting commercial properties on California drive. 840 edgehill has 5 bedrooms and 5
bathrooms with a hair salon. 828 Edgehill is an apartment complex with 5 units with 9
bedrooms. These addresses are to the right and left of the subject property, 832 edgehill. There
are 0 FT setbacks on most of these properties with mixed usage. The subject property neighbors
a hair salon and personal training studio on the California drive side. The subject property is only
1 story, however due to the unusual slope this addition is considered a second story. It is only
7FT underneath this addition which the ailowable for a single story is 6FT. The entire house is 1
level and will be extended out as if it was 1 story. There will be no bottom floor or livable area
below this new addition. If it was considered a single siory addition it would meet the rear set
back variance of 15FT. The proposed project shows a 15.6FT setback if approved.
E3. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship
migh[ result from the denia! of the application
Subject property has an extraordinarily low lot coverage compared to its neighbors and has
a comparably smalier lot area of 4140 sq ft when compared to the other lots on the block. If
denied, the subject property poses to lose a substantial gain of one covered parking space
and bedroom. i have a family of 4 and it would be very difficult to live in a 2 bedroom home
with no garage. I love Burlingamc and would love to live here and enlarge my existing home
rather than searching for another one. If approved there will still be a setback of 15.6Ft
which meets the setback requirement for a 1 single story home. This 15ft is 15ft more than
most my towering neighbors with mixed use structures. My elderly mother currently lives in
Mills Estates in Qurlingame and the hills are too difficult for her to walk up and down. If
approved my mother plans to live in this home, in the new addition bedroom, so she can
walk to E3urlingame Ave and handle her day to day activities without the use of a taxi. She is
a 36 year resident of Burlingame. Homes are becoming more and more expensive and
getting 3 bedrooms out of this home would reaily help me financially and keep me in
Qurlingarne for the rest of my life.
�-�� �,m `y,....:� Sl..y. 9 �k� i�..� �
ElU! 1 2 ZOi3
cir�r o� su���ticaM�
CQD-PL.ANNING DN
_ �_
C. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location wil� not be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare or
convenience.
The proposed project is to be used as a single family residential property. The subject
property will not be detrimental to the property in the vicinity to public health, safety,
general welfare, or convenience. If approved the home will still be 1/3 of the size of all of
the surrounding neighbors. This RC-zoned property will be just residential and will not
impact any neighboring businesses or homes. The proposed structure will improve visuals
from the California drive side because an old douglas fur deck and 100 year old fence
currently show on the California drive side of this home. If approved it the new bedroom
wil! have modern siding, windows, and increase the cosmetic appeal of California drive. The
addition will simply replace the existing deck so no bigger footprints will exist. The home is
only one story so there will be no view impacts or eye soars.
D. How wili the proposed project be compafible with fhe aesthetics, mass, bu/k
and character of the existing and potentia! uses on adjoining properties in the
general vicinity?
The proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk, and character of
the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties. The proposed project will retain the
existing structures architectural features and shall not disturb California drives current
mixed use commercial massing, bulk, and character. Currently there is a deck where the
new bedroom wouid go. The roof line will simply be extending and the deck enclosed. The
same materials and siding will be used on the proposed addition and wili match the rest of
the existing structure. The character of the neighborhood would not change because I
would only be adding another bedroom. The apartment complex need door (828 edgehill)
has over 9 bedrooms and the mixed use home ather side (840 edgehill) has 5 bedrooms and
a hair salon. The aesthetics will improve because it does look odd now with such a small
home surrounded by so many large structures. The home was built in 1918 and I look
forward to replacing the rotted out deck, fences, an restoring its beauty.
����.�������
,.iUi_. � 2 2!?� Y
�;i-, �r c�; �ur�_o�c,�!�E
C�D-P!_ANNi�iG (�iV.
�' `,"�
BURUNGAME
�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARIANCE APPLICATION
_.�_ . ,. :w.� �
;�1, �
r, _
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your property which do not app/y to other properties in this area.
Subject property is in zoning district C-R. All other lots are either fully covered to the
property line or does not meet the minimum 20 feet rear setback requirement on
California Dr. Subject property is the only property on the block which is either not fully
covered to the property line and meets the 20 feet rear setback requirement.
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right and what unreasonable property /oss or unnecessary
hardship might result from the denial of the application.
Subject property has an extraordinarily low lot coverage compared to its' neighbors and
has a comparably smaller lot area of 4140 sqft when compared to the other lots on the block.
If denied, the subject property poses to lose a substantial gain of one covered parking space
and increase habitable living space.
c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience.
The proposed project is to be used as a single family residential property. The subject
property will not be detrimental to property in the vicinity to public health, safety, general
welfare, or convenience.
d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of fhe existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinify?
The proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk, and character of
the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties. The proposed project will retain the
existing structures architectural features and shall not disturb California Drive's current mixed
use commercial massing, bulk, and character.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • SO1 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
Handouts\Variance Application.2008
�r� ; � 1
;�\a\ ' _
'1C
Lot Coverage >40%
CITY OF BURLINGAME
VARIANCE APPLICATION
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance
(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning
Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request.
Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
your properfy which do nof apply to other properties in this area.
Subject property has an existing lot coverage of 39.2% without the mandatory covered parking
space. All other adjacent neighbors on the block are at a greater lot coverage of the 40%
allowed and have multiple covered parking spaces.
b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substanfial property right and what unreasonab/e property loss or unnecessary
hardship might result from the denial of the application.
Subject property is the only property on the block which does not have a covered parking space
and increased lot coverage. Without the variance, the property owner will not be able to fully
enjoy their property as their neighbors would.
c. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity o
general welfare or convenience.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 5O'I PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 94010
p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org
will not be detrimental or
r to public health, safety,
Subject property is only a residential property and shall not effect the commercial nature
of California Dr.
d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and
character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general
vicinity?
The proposed project will match existing aesthetics and shall not disrurb California Dr's current
commercial massing, bulk, and character.
Handouts\Variance Application.2008
D. How will fhe proposed project be compatible wifh fhe aesthetics, mass, bulk
and character of ihe existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the
general vicinify?
Th� proposed project will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk, and character of
the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties. The garage will be in the back of the
property and will be a moderr� structure. Lookirig at most of the homes on Edgehill Rd, the
majority of the garages are detached garages in the same rear area of the lot that I am
proposing. The garage will ha��e the look and aapearance of a detached garage, it will just be
very close to the rear of the huuse due to the abnormaliy small lot and slope. If approved,
having this gara�e will match i:he character of the rest of the neighborhood and the City of
E3urlingame because it will ha��e a covered parking spot just like everyone else. Every house
on Edgehill Rd. has either an attached or detached garage and if approved it will match ail
other similar homes.
�������f ��
:i�1L 1 2 20�3
co ; �r o� �ur��r�caM�
CL'D-PLANNIfvG DiV.
City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-379Q www.burlingame.org
i�i ��;,-, �
� �� s •..��
C���
����`�'',��`„�'�. �I
�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
SPECIAL PERMIT APPLIGATION
_. . ., ._,. _ . ::�
. ! � C.. ;
�-., � ., .-
The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code
Section 25.50). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making
the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink.
Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions.
1. Explain why tlTe blend of mass, scale and donzinant structural c/zaracteristics ofihe new
construction or addition are consistent witla the existing structure's design and with the
existing street and neighborhood.
The proposed project will not affect the neighborhood properties at California Dr.
The neighborhood does not have any cohesive defining properties that may
be affected by the proposed project.
2. Explain /zow t/ae variety of roof line, facacte, exterior fznis/a �naterials and elevatiores of
the proposed new structure or additio�z are consistent witla t/ae existing structure, street
and neighborliood.
The proposed project will maintain the neighborhood character as the existing
structures architectural features are to remain and be extended to the new structure.
Roof lines, facades, and exterior finishes shall be matched with existing features and
materials.
3. How will t/ze proposed project be consistent wit{z tlze residential design guidelines
adopted by the city (C.S. 25.57)?
The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines as it
provides 1 minimafly required covered parking space, in which the property is
currently deficient.
4. Explain how the removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or
addition is necessary and is consistent witla tlae city's reforestation requirentents. What
rnitigation is proposed for tlze removal of any trees? Explain why this mitigation is
appropriate.
The proposed project will not be removing any trees located with the new footprint
of the new structure. sPECPExM.F�
FRONT ELEVATION VIEW AT EDGEHILL DR
844 EDGEHILL DR
840 EDGEHILL DR
832 EDGEHILL DR
828 EDGEHILL DR
824 EDGEHILL DR
�$
�„ � � ��.,� � � � � 6�
� �.! �. � � �: , �
i.��t�I ii� �it..Ei:2_;i�';�'r':j'ft`�
GG`�`-.'L.'.' , .�. ,.�r:�! :t
824 EDGEHILL DR
828 EDGEHILL DR
832 EDGEHILL DR
840 EDGEHILL DR
844 EDGEHILL DR
'�
-- �
� E �.� v� . ..,. .. � :�� �
JUL1i2::;
REAR ELEVATION VIEW AT CALIFORNIA DR
� �����, •s
1TY C;�- E..:���_:� !G.�'s�„C
C�iJ-h'f,M`„`VS`Jl:�:a t�f`l.
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
August 22, 2013
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
and Rear Setback Variances for a second story addition to an
existing single family dwelling and new detached garage at 832
Edgehill Drive, zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
No further comments.
All conditions of approval as stated in the review dated 7-12-2013 will apply to this
project.
_._..
� ____- ;
Reviewed q�. ��— � i Date: 8-23-2013
�"
Date:
To:
From:
�,,� �.,,.�, � ,,.,w..: �...,,:�, .�,..�,KK .� ,.w .,,�, . �w�.wu.� �. ....:.��LL....�,
Pro�ect Comments
� Engineering Division 0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600
X Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
Setback Variance for a second story addition and new attached
garage to an existing single-family dwelling at 832 Edgehill Drive,
zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building
Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California
Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing
Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the
Planning Commission has not approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on
December 31, 2013 then this project must comply with the 2013 California
Building Codes.
2) On the plans provide a copy of the GreenPoints checklist for this project at full
scale.
3) Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy
Efficiency Standards.
Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24/2Q08standards/ for publications and
details.
��Place the following information on the first page of the plans:
"Construction Hours"
Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m.
Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
(See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.)
�On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that
require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for
these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning
Commission." The building owner, project designer, andlor contractor must
submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job
Copy of the plans prior to performing the work.
6) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame
business license.
7) Provide fully dimensioned plans.
8) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries,
the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site
parking.
9) Provide existing and proposed elevations.
10)Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be
demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: A condition of this project
approval is that the Demolition Permit will not be issued and, and no work
can begin (including the removal of an building components), until a
Building Permit has been issued for the project. The property owner is
responsible for assuring that no work is authorized or performed.
11)Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed
property lines
12)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures.
13)Obtain a survey of the property lines for any structure within one foot of the
�roperty line. (PWE letter dated 8-17-88)
4 dicate on the plans that exterior bearing walls less than five feet from the
property line will be built of one-hour fire-rated construction. (2010 CBC, Table
602)
�Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or
door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the location and the
net clear opening height and width of all required egress windows on the
elevation drawin s.
16 dicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the
Department of Public Works.
17)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at
any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the
Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in
height.
18)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers.
19)Provide lighting at all exterior landings.
NOTE: A written response to the items noted here and plans that specifically
address items 4, 5, 14, 15, and 16 must be re-submitted before this project can
move forward for Planning om ission action.
Reviewe
ate: 7-12-2013
,�`o'e Cy�`! CBO
650-�v8-7270
Project Comments
Date:
To:
X Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
0 Building Division
(650) 558-7260
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
From:
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
Setback Variance for a second story addition and new attached
garage to an existing single-family dwelling at 832 Edgehill Drive,
zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
1. The proposed garage appears to be constructed within one foot of property
line which requires a property boundary survey by a licensed land
surveyor/engineer.
2. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the
City storm drain system.
3. Replace all displaced/damaged sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter.
4. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works —
Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information.
Reviewed by: V V
Date: 8/15/2013
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
August 30, 2013
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
X Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
0 Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(850) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
and Rear Setback Variances for a second story addition to an
existing single family dwelling and new detached garage at 832
Edgehill Drive, zaned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
1. No further Comments.
Reviewed by: BD
Date: 9/4/13
Project Comments
Date:
August 22, 2013
To: 0 Engineering Division
(650) 558 7230
� Building Division
�s5o� 5ss-�2sa
� Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
From: Planning Staff
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
� n�__ E+,...a�..,�i� ��,..�,.....�,.. r,�.. � a ,a�t�a•�... a-
c111U 1'[Cdl JCtUG1l:R VclIIdlll:Cj IUI d jCI:VIIU Jl({71�% CIUUILfU11 l�J citl
existing single family dwelling and new detached garage at 832
Edgehill Drive, zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
���
�. �
.- �
„
.f � t%� �S f �'�2.�' �� �.G�+,.� �9 �-e�t �C �'��¢ %�c��t o �`� i�- �
(/ (�'
� L'�� �7 L�,-(�C,i, G`,Gs�c� ��.5[r'..i.c�. c:`�t.�-- LLci-{ CGtvt�SC'd�
��� l,�l.tk;t� L� � Ldw� �z .� t.� .
� �YG��#
3 � � s�.�.� �`��� ��'��:.-c��� ��rs�'��i�.
� ��u j�� ���� �
n�vicv'r�u uy: ��"
�a�c: � �Z���3
Project Comments
Date:
To:
From:
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
�sso� 5s$-72so
X Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
Planning StafF
� Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
� Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
Setback Variance for a second story addition and new attached
garage to an existing single-family dwelling at 832 Edgehill Drive,
zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110 ,
Staff Review:
�� 1. If Public Works requires sidewalk replacement, Policy for Expanding Width
of Planter Strip needs to be implemented
,-r` �,�`�,,
r,'��' 1As per requirements, landscape plan must include 1 landscape tree (non-fruit
-_ ;, �: �bearing) per 1000 SF of livings space.
Revi�wed by: B Disco
Date: 7/18/13
Project Comments
Date:
To:
� Engineering Division
(650) 558-7230
� Building Division
(650) 558-7260
0 Parks Division
(650) 558-7334
❑x Fire Division
(650) 558-7600
0 Stormwater Division
(650) 342-3727
� City Attorney
(650) 558-7204
From:
Planning Staff
Subject: Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
Setback Variance for a second story addition and new attached
garage to an existing single-family dwelling at 832 Edgehill Drive,
zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
Staff Review:
No comments at this time.
Reviewed by: ��
Date: ��Z � 11.3
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Staff Review:
Project Corr�ments
� Engineering Division � Fire Division
(650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7600
� Building Division X Stormwater Division
(650) 558-7260 (650) 342-3727
� Parks Division � City Attorney
(650) 558-7334 (650) 558-7204
Planning Staff
Request for Design Review, Special Permit for attached garage, Side
Setback Variance for a second story addition and new attached
garage to an existing single-family dwelling at 832 Edgehill Drive,
zoned C-R, APN: 029-022-110
1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the City's
NPDES (stormwater) permit to prevent stormwater pollution from construction
activities. Project proponent shall ensure all contractors implement appropriate and
effective BMPs during all pha�e� of con�truction, including demolition. When
submitting plans for a building permit include a list of construction BMPs as project
notes on a separate full size plan sheet, preferably 2' x 3' or larger. Project
proponent may use the attached Construction BMPs plan sheet to comply with this
requirement. Electronic file is available for download at:
http://www.flowstobay.org/documents/business/construction/Countywide_Program_B
MP_Plan_Sheet Jun2012.pdf
2) Best Management Practices (BMPs) requirements apply on any projects using
architectural copper. To learn what these requirements are, see attached flyer
"Requirements for Architectural Copper." Electronic file is available for download at:
http://www.flowstobay.org/documents/municipalities/nd/Materials/2012%20Materials/
Architectural_copper_BMPs_FI NAL.pdf
For assistance please contact Stephen D. at 650-342-3727
Reviewed by: SD �%� Date: 7/15/13
1 i 2 ��� �
,,�- ;,� ,��_�
_- �..
SAN MkTEO COUNTYWIDE
Water Pollution
Prevention Program
Clean Waiec Heaithy Community.
Construction Best Management Practic
es (BMPs)
Construction projects are required to implement the stormwater best management practices (BMP) on this page,
as they apply to your project, all year ]ong.
Yiaterials & V�'aste bIanagement
Noo-Aazunlous 1letcriniti
❑ Bcm� and caver s�wApiles of sand, dirt or olher consRucfion marerial
u�itl� �s.cLcn tain is forecasi or if noi ac[ivcl.• bcing uwd �.ithin
14 dars.
❑ Usc (but don't oeemse) mcluimed mntcr for du:� conirol.
Har�rdous hla4rials
❑ Leb.-.1 ail h.rardous mat<rinls and immrdous n•nslcs (sich as
puriciJes, paines, Winuers. soieenes, Pocl, oil, nnd �ntifrcczc) in
nccordnnce.vith <iry_ coumy, sm�e and fedual regulations.
❑ Srore haeardoia mutcrials mid was(cs L� watcr Gght containcrs, slorc
in appropriale ucm�dary conlainmenl, and cover diem a[ the end af
c�•crc w�ork day m during n�ct �ee�ther or �rhen min is lurccnst
❑ Foilox� man� clnrer s applicalion inswcGons forhazardous
mav,rials and be enreFW noc �o uu mort than nacessan�_ Do not
app1� chemicals ouldoocx �vLcn rain is fomcasc within 2d hours.
❑ Art- ge for appmpriate disposai ofnll ha�rdous wasles.
Wasic NUnagcmrnt
❑ Carcr ivaztc disposal eoalaincrs sccu`cle wilfi mrys u ihc cnd of
a'crc n�ork dac and during rvci �vcatl�er.
❑ Check was�c disposal containers @equcn�ly Far leal:s and m maAe
sme �hey am not ovefilled. Ne�er hose dmm n dwipsier on Wc
cansvucuan siro.
❑ Clean or replace ponablc ioilcis. and i«spen Oicm Crequcntly for
IcaAs and spills.
❑ Disposc oCall ivnsics and debris O�Im��)•. Ren�cic maeerials and
waslw Ihat wn bc recycicd (such as azphalt. concrelc. a64�6��c basc
mmerinLs. n�ood. gyp bonrd P'P�, c�c.)
❑ Dispose of Iiquid msidaes from puinls, �hinnvs, sob�ents, glues, and
ciraning flnids as Laznrdous ��•uie.
Conscruction Entranc� and Pcrimcicr
O Fslabfish and mnintaui cBw[ivc perimcicrcomrols and stabiliu ali
construcuon entrunces nnd esics m suLLcienth• control emsion and
:ediment diuharges Crom site v�d �cl-ing offsire.
❑ Sweep or racuum any strcel uacking immediately m�d secure
sediment soume [o preven� funlier uacking. Never hose down strcets
�o cicun up vecking.
Eguipment Nlanagement &
Spill Control
�j
�
�
MainicoanccandParkin��� ��
❑ Desigoate an area, fined �vit4 appropriatc BMP; for
velucle und equipment perkuig �d swrage.
� Pcrform major maintenance, repairjobs, and vehicle
and cquipmenl ttnshing otisitc.
❑ If afueling or veltidc mau�re�wnce musc be dm�e
wuilc, p•orY, in a bcmied arn a�vay hom s[orm drains
nnd orer a drip pan hig enough lo wllec[ Ouids.
Recyck or dispose of Buids as harudous ivule.
� ffvehicleorcquipmentclwningmu5t6edoneonsiro,
dean xiUi ma¢r onh in a hcm�td area thai ivill not
nllon� rinse wmcr ro nm jNo guttcrs. sh2ctz stotm
� drains. ors�ufacc n•alcrs.
❑ Do ml clean ��chicic or cqnipmcn[ onsitc using saapg
soh�ents, de@rcascrs. steam cleaning equipmen� etc.
Spili Prcvcntion and Control
❑ Kccp spill cicanup matcrials (regs, absorbcnts, c[c.)
a��ailab(c at ihc rnnsryvction silc at�lf tima.
❑ Inspccl vchicics and cqwpmrnt Gequcudy fur ond
.epair leala p`omptlp. Use drip puns ro entch iwks
w�� repn�rs are modc.
❑ Cleun up spilb ar leela immediatety mid dispose of
cieanup ma�erials pmpedr.
❑ Do not hose do.vn surFaccs n•hefc fiuids ha�e spilled
Uu dn• clrnnup mcJiods (absorbcnt matcrials. wt
liltrs, and/or rags).
❑ S�vccp up spillcd dn� mh(crinls immcdiatclp. Da no1
� lo wosh them eo�uc wi0i wamc or biw them.
� Clean up spills au din veas bp digging up und
p�operlp disposiug of contaminated soil.
❑ Reparlsignifie�antspillsinunWinteir.Youscrequ'ved
b�- In�t lo tepoct all signi5cant mleoses of hnzardoi�s
malcrials, inchiding oii. To rcpart n spill: I) Dia191(
or your lxel emergcncr'esponsc nwuber, 2) Call ��e
Go�emor's OBce of Empgrnc�� $ervices Waming
Ccmea (800) Bi2-75i0 (2d hours).
Earth�vork &
Contaminated
S'OI�S
Paving/Asphalt Work
.`� M' l' _ �_ � ,•�.
.. .�..� : a� �a. :-. `4
� 0
��. ', � ,- ' '
�,!
�'.i. ��-.?��i< � � m
,. ,. : ,��
Erosian Confml
❑ Sch W We grading and �rcaration �rorl: for
dp• wenthrr only,
❑ Smhilize el1 dewded alcns, insl.ill and
nlaiOfe111 hmppiary e[05ion COn6pls (SLch
ns erosion wuhol fa6ric or bonded fiba
mavi�)unril igemrionisesm6lished
❑ Swd or plant wgcraoon for emsion
wntrol on slopcs or ni�c¢ consWcrioa is
notinm�cdiatcly planncd
Sutiment Contml
❑ Pm[ut s�arm drain inlets, BWters, ditc6es,
ond dcaioagc coursce »ilh appmprinte
BA{Ps. sucli as �av¢l bags, fibcr mlLs,
bemu, etc,
❑ Ac"eat uAimcnt hom migralmg o93ite
by inslalling and maimairting sedimen[ �
counoLs, such as 5bcr'p11s, si�t fenccs. or
scdimcn[buzins.
� Kcep c�ca�atcd soil on ihc sim n�hcr ic
�riii noc wllea into Ihe stteeL
❑ Trausfereswvatcd matcrials to dump
trucks on tl�e sitq not in Ilm sheel.
❑ Con�anumtW Soils
❑ Ifaq•af[hcfalloningwndioonsam
obxnxd, tevt for wnraminatiun nnd
wu4ct tF¢ Itegionnl Wurer Qualitp
Conuol Board_ .
■ Unusud soil co�Witions, discoloru0vq
arodor.
■ Abandoncd undcrguund tanks.
lil Abandonod wclls
■ Buricd bnrrels, dcbris, or vaslt
Storm drain polluters
❑ Acoid pm�ing and swl waring in wU
m�xWv, orwhen rain is forecast heFore
fresh parcmuu wiil havc limc to cwc.
❑ Covcr sromi drain Inlcts and maMolcs
wbcu applying s�al coaL faW; coa4 slum�
sW, fog seal, e¢.
O Collectandmyci<orappmprialcle
dispore oCucess abrasive p�a�xl or sand.
Do NOT m•eep or wash it in[o guttcrs.
❑ Do not nse wetc m wash down fresL
asphal[ concrcic paccmenC
Sae•cutting Sc AsphaltlConcrete Rcmo�•ai
❑ Complemlv weu or 6n�ric¢de stonu
drainidccswhensm.�wuing Uscfilicr
fabrie, ptch basin inlet filtcrs. or graecl
b�Bs m l:ecp sliure out af tl�e stom� drain
s�•srun.
❑ Shorel, a6owrb. or vncuwn san�Ku�
slurty �d disposc of all u�asrc az soon
es yau arc finishcd in onc lowtian or ot
fhe end of racL work day (iehichtt�er is
soanal).
� If sa�F�cut slurty enters e calch bui2 clean
it��pimmcdialcly.
Concrete, Grout & il�lortar
Application
❑ Smrc concrctc gout and monar undcr
co¢r, ou pnllets and o�ea�� Cmm dainagc
arC35.'jhese mateti�Lt nlusl ntt'cr rc�Cl� a
slam� dmin.
❑ �Vesh aur concrelc cqwpmcn�'vucls
affsirc or in a conmiucd arcy so Ihcs
is no discharge inw thc undetlrinp soil
or ouco surrounding amas. [,ci concres
herdcn and disposc of as garbagc.
� Colleu�h<�.ashnaccrfmm�easl�iny
esposcd aggrcgam concre�c and remorc i�
for appropriatc disposal ofTsitc.
Dewatering
�4" � F
Y
`:��
--� .:
❑ Ffiec�i��xlc managc all run.oti �II
runoff �vi�hin tlie sitc. and ail nuiolTthut
dimtwrgcs fmm Wc siic. Di��cn rw-ou
�ralcr from oRxiic auay from nll disiurbcd
areas or otLenaise ensure compliance.
❑ KTcn dcwa�cnng votif• and obtain
aPPro�•al @am 1he lowl municipnlin'
fwfocc disUurginp ���a�v �o a stmci guucr
arstocm diain. Fil¢anon or dii�crsion
tluoug6 a basin. tanl:, or szdimeni trap
ma�� be requircd.
� In arcas of Imonn conLun inauon, �ating
is mquirrA pnor Io reusc ordisdu�c of
groundw•nlcc Cansull w�ilh Wc Engincu �o
detem�inc ��•hetlirr testlng is required and
ha�v �o iuicryrei msulu. Coniaminaied
S�wdi��aicr musi bc v�icd or hmdcd
off-sitc forproperdisposnl.
be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per dav!
Painting & paint Removal
x..r. �:� �'� , �
� y;
� t,
� ��
`
rainring dcanup
❑ Ncrcrdcanbmshesorrinsepaint
cantnincrs imo a siccct, guucc siomi
dra�n, orsurfecc ��alcrs
❑ For n�elco-bazcd pnin�s, paml aul bmshcs
lo dic ccicnl possiblc. Rinsc io �hc
sani[nq• u�reronceyou hnce gained
penniuion from Wc lacal wastcn�mv
�rca�nwni aull�ority. Nh�cr pour paim
down a drnin.
❑ Foroil-boscd poin�s, puim ow brushcs �o
the e��cm possiblc and eican �viW Ihinncr
or sol��rni in a pmper conuLicc Filler w�d
r uc ihi�mcrs and soh�en�s. Disposc of
residuc and umisable ihinnerlmlvems as
lu>nrdous wasic.
Painl mmur:J
❑ Chemicul pain� stripping residuc ond
chips and dusi from mnrinc paims or
pain�x wntoining Icod or iri6uh�l�n musi
bc disposcd of as ha>ardaus w�sic.
� Poini cbips and Anst Rom nonJ�arrrdouz
dn� svipP��S �d sand blostins may bc
��•cp� up or collcncd in pfas�ic dmp
clochs nnd disposcd ofns unsh,
Landscape Materials
� .+.. :
- ��p( l
;�'ic�_t�.
.: �W
❑ Cmiain stxkpiled landscaping mmcnols
bc sioring Uinn undcr �urps..i�cn iha. yt
not activcic bcu�g �u<d.
❑ S�ick crodi6lc londscn�c mnlcrini an
palleu. Covcr ar siorc J� sc m�icrials
�ehen iLc�� nrc noi acrird�• bc;ng uscd or
npplicd,
❑ Discontinuc applicnlion af vp' erodiblc
�ands�apc �,a�crio�,,.;W,� 1 d�,.s bc�o2 a
famcnsi roin crcnt or during �vn �.�cndrer.
�
SAH HA1 EOtQIJAtYWIDF
Ware�fPo���rion
�revertt�on Progra m
qe�eWarof• X��Khy Ccmmanny.
Requirements for Architectural Copper
Protect water quality during installation, cleaning, treating, and washing!
Copper from Buildings May Harm Aquatic Life
Copper can harm aquatic (ife in San Francisco Bay. Water that comes
info contact with architectural copper may contribute to impacts,
especially during installation, cleaning, treating, or washing. Patination
solutions that are used to obtain the desired shade of green or brown
typically contain acids. After treatment, when the copper is rinsed to
remove these acids, the rinse water is a source of pollutants.
M unicipalities prohibit discharges to the storm drain of water used in the
in staliation, cleaning, treating and washing of architectural copper,
U se Best Management Practices (BMPs)
The following Best Management Practices (BMPs)
discharges to storm drains.
must be implemented to prevent prohibited
During lnstallation
• If possible, purchase copper materials that have been pre-patinated at the factory.
• If patination is done on-site, implement one or more of the following BMPs:
o Discharge the rinse water to landscaping. Ensure that the
rinse water does not flow to the street or storm drain.
Block off storm drain inlet if needed.
o Collect rinse water in a tank and pump fo the sanitary
sewer. Contact your locaf� sanitary sewer agency before
discharging to the sanitary sewer.
o Collect the rinse water in a tank and haul off-site for
proper disposaL
• Consider coafing the copper materials with an impervious
coating that prevents further. corrosion and runoff. This will
also maintain the desired color for a longer time, requiring
less maintenance.
During Maintenance
Implement the following BMPs during routine mainfenance activities, such as power washing the roof,
re-patination or re-application of impervious coating:
• Block storm drain inlets as needed to prevent runoff from entering storm drains.
• Discharge the wash water to landscaping or to the sanitary sewer (with permission from the local
sanitary sewer agency), If this is not an option, haul the wash water off-site for proper disposal,
Protect the Bay/Ocean and yourself!
If you are responsible for a discharge to the storm drain of non-
stormwater generated by installing, cleaning, treafing or washing
copper architectural features, you are in violation of the municipal
stormwater ordinance and may be subject to a fine.
Contact Information
The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program lists municipal stormwater contacts at
www.flowstobay.orq (click on "Business", then "New Development", then "local permitting agency").
FINAL February 29, 2012
gutter and drainpipe.
prohibited discharge. The water must be
pumped and disposed of p�oper/y.
a CI I Y OF BURLINGAME
, ` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
�URLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
�, ��' � � � BURLINGAME, CA 94010
''�"'�' PH: (650) �58-7250 • FAX: (650) 696-3790
- www.burlingame.org
Site: 832 EDGEHILL DRIVE
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the
following puhlic hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 23,
2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the (ity Hall fountil [hambers, 501
Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA:
Application for Design Review, Side and Rear Sethack
Vnriances and Special Permit for an addition on the main
floar (considered to be two-story at the rear af the house)
and a new attached garage at 832 EDGEHILL DRIVE
zoned R-1. APN 029-022-110
Mailed: September 13, 2013
(Please refer to other side)
PU��IC HEAitINIG
IVO'I�ICE
City of Burlingame
A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior fo
fhe meefiing at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose
Road, Burlingame, California.
If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing,
described in the riotice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or
prior to the publie hearing.
Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their
tenants about this notice.
For additional iniormation, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.
William Meeker
Community Developmeni Director
PllBLIC FIE�►IZING NOTICE
(Please refer fo ofher sideJ
'�" � � �� � Y, � � � 1 +. �'�. �`� '� ;� �� ,�, <
� ':' .�' ' . ( � _ ' �� i � ! � � . � r �� ��:t� I�
! '~, ��" �.,�' I i� '�
CI� • _� ,.
b � �' . �. ��. �, �,
�-���� � �- - � �
��. � ... � y ��� r J�7ru» �,' `?,* #
. ' ,�� ���+«��{f�x`t''y � t � �_.r �.� /��,�,
� i¢ ��
' - '`�..� ,- �i ISFII � I f ,I. ii '� P
� 4�j . . .. y � •
y " ���{ � . �. . r' �;.
r , - . , � 5,��'. � .. .
:
� i .
.�
_ `a� . �.� _ . �, .,� . � .
. . � . e .;r: � . `,
- L ; '} ` • iR` - - � ,
.,
� �:. . . � �
�: ,
,- . � : g, t ��
�•: � ' : . i � 3 ��, .�. � �.��
,z� : � �, a`' s ` � �; ti ,. �
+' " � ti r Nt4 Y ' � `! � � � � � k 1�•� � �v�!�
. i
�4 �.� r' � i� � � i �. � -
� � �'7 . . ._P tit {" s �� ti�. . . �I.>`, y`. - .
4 � �i u.� � '
.'�' � ` ��, ..�,� '� �'
' � #,
�. ���~ ���. � � . � ` � � . ..
�
^�ay'� '++.� �� u ,�, `� � j �i � • � 4 .
�e �Vf ., t�'r P � �,Lt;� . �-a r� »
�' x s7i � t�� 'i 1� +� * �r , � � , .,
7 . h' �
�, �
�'� r �' '� .�� ,�� �"�"�� � ; , ,, . " ,
,
... .,
,} �. < `
�� y a 3 � t � •� ��\ M� � � ."�
%' � e.� �R��, 1 Y°' t t�. � f
•� ' �� � 8 � ��i� r` �� 1 � � � �'[ � i✓� f � .. ' - i
" ` � .,.� _ 1 it� ��%Y�if E p5��.a � � � - �# �,., �
� i . . � � (,� "y� . � '
='l r 8. ._ •:�� ;- k' ` r. � . i .
,
, *1. �'� ' . � � t .X4:'k' i.�' . � L� � ' .' ��,� • �, •
_. x.w}.� .�� � � , Wf'� �' <�. .. . j - . �'�
$ / {� � +. � ; �
O � . •' � i f ' y"L;, � � £ t�,� ., . ' �
��
v - .N e� ,r.. ., µ
�'M►! .�� . c ��.:1 : �, Y' � - � e., *y ��-� , � 2.
� - i4 � � �r =� �r~ _ ' �, �.'q'�.' �.: o, . M .. - . :
. _D ���yq'�'j,�� <, i�� y �'� .yay �. , �� �y�.y
•�✓, ��':' ' ,� `tr, •1C � ' -U�': T<" •, � ' �ik�f (�,�. �' `, � T!� -".Y 1 • 1 _� �' ',. '
� ' ...� h � T.� �� F3 �.a}' . �
,f ro., .' .- � _ �A`0, � _' � � ` � �� -.. . . .� QF�� _." '
<�� �r� � f�'~.�. � i' �� ,��� �` �� '
1 e,� �� . W� ��� p � � . �� ;Y e .-��w ..
y� .. .
fi.
^{ ��'.�t.. 4 � :2 ..,. ` ` � S � . ` ��F� ,� �t�� '� .
��
- �
;�,�: •� a 8
�' i�,L. '� � "" � t �.3 ,';, �'
.�. ; : `
.+' '�� ` r`^� ' -� —
- 'p
� �. } '
� � �.:_� .. . _Y �•
� -,.'...�� d .. ..y � . .... ,� ,. n
� '] � �
. r w � .
rY� �
.���� 6�,.. .'��� . � . .y. `, �
� .a.� . .. _ � � ___
rv� �a
� � 4'�
� � �'� �3 s � `
'� � =`� s � Y `� �:
�q ° a �;� �_ .
- �� .. �i � �D� ' . �� � � -`• `X`P.i 6.. � •>:.
6 w 8 � �.� [/ t�� ��'
...:, : :� .. � .� +i
.
,.. ,. c . ,�-�++ � � �
� � � :�
,
y �., �' �� , : . � �� � • , - W �
� /`. "/ ,� t - y y ;s t
' . �� 'n • . .?± � , �.
�� � � �• t
- . .:���� . t'. - � 'a
� i� i
� i,-a' ` � t
�a;, .: � � ., ,�.� -- . �� ��
. � , � '. F . ��L"i �D •_�'� �. ` � -..
U �
�. `� a'� $ �� _ � • �
S '�';•� � �'r„ �I F
�.�'j• r'�'. �;�, ��e4�+': �� y"q. . �� �4�
yat:�, ,�ti �`�.. n .�,P J � �� n •..���� I� ����� `�
P� -�� ,"d.�� � '�i. F� a,��, �Y -
sY� ' t�
� ,�,. .. , - J��. �'• = �� .
� }i } + �.. �.�� �'� � � C ' Y
��i� •�,'+` ` /� �` \ ��'�:� .Y . � � D �
� � ' ' 1 a��' � ���,
. �'' k,.` ��; '� , � ' ;.... �`.' � �=�. `.
� r ..4 �, � �' i , i
y .. _ � �� a' � '�. Jti'
.., , S �, _ y } y.
� ~{ �r?1Y� �,. jf � ''� y A �� '�
. � � i � �'.� �k _` � �! J� , �j��� - ��Y �
7��i:�'=
- �� � • � � � � � t�' y '�
�� .
6s� "; . i . . �
` �t.,,,v _ . .,,� — yo ,,�+ � � ' � ..
!r� 'E' .+T . , . .y.`...'�c
, 'a3� - - _ i � .ii.� .Y � �� T'. �: �'.,y