The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2627 Easton Drive - Staff ReportCity of Burlingame Design Review Amendment Item # Action Calendar Address: 2627 Easton Drive Meeting Date: 10/09/O1 Request: Design review amendment for a first and second story addition at 2627 Easton Drive, zoned R-1 (C.S. 25.28.040) Property Owner: Tricia Godowski Applicant/Architect: CSS Architecture, Martin Dreiling APN: 027-195-150 Date Submitted: September 10, 2001 Lot Area: 6,749.55 SF General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1-(e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. History: At the March 12, 2001 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission voted 6-0-1(Cmrs. Dreiling abstaining) to approve a design review and side setback variance for a first and second story addition at 2627 Easton Drive. The project is currently under construction. The applicant is requesting a design amendment in order to change windows along the east elevation. During the original review of this project it was noted that there was a 5.15' X 150' piece of land located along the east (left) side of the property that was not a part of the legal lot. The existing east (left) side wall was determined to be non-conforming, coming within 2'-8'�Z" of the east (left) side property line. The original proposal included adding bedrooms on the ground floor and changing out windows in part for design and in part to meet egress requirements for bedrooms. Because of this configuration the Chief Building Official only allowed replacement of existing windows, but prohibited new windows an increase in the area of the existing window opening because the east side wall was less than 3 feet from property line. The applicant recently completed a Quiet Title and gained ownership of a 2'-6" wide by 150' deep portion of the 5' wide piece of land next to this property. This acquisition caused an adjustment to the location of the east side property line and increases the left side setback of the existing structure from 2'-8'�Z" to 5'-3". The need for a side setback variance for the proposed project is now eliminated. The left side wall is now more than 3 feet from the side property line, which will allow an increase in window area along this side property line. The applicant is requesting a design review amendment for the following changes along the left side: Ground Floor - enlargement of (2) 2'-6" X 3' bedroom windows to (2) 2'-11" X 3'-11"; - enlargement of 2'-6" X 3' bedroom window to 2'-11" X 3'-11"; - addition of one 2'-5" X 4'-5" bedroom window below existing bay; Second Floor enlargement of (3) 1'-6" X 2'-6" kitchen windows to (3) 2'-1" X 2'-11" windows with the addition of (3) 2'-1" X 1'-5" transom windows above; and relocation and enlargement of (1) 1'-6" X 2'-6" kitchen nook window to (3) 1'-11" X 3'-5" windows. ' Design Review Amendment Z6Z7 Easton Urive CURRENT PREVIOUSLY EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D PROPOSAL APPROVED (9/10/Ol) PROPOSAL (3/12/O1) SETBACKS Front (15` flr): No change 28'-0" 28'-0" 15' or block average (2"`' flr): No change 28'-0" 28'-0" 20'-0„ Side (left): 5'-3" 2'-0'/z" (in-fill)' *2'-0 %z" 4'-0" Side (right): No change No change *2'-9 3/4" 4'-0" Rear (15` flr): No change 66'-0" 77'-0" 15'-0" (2"`' flr): 66'-0" 65'-4" 20'-0" LOT COVERAGE: 28.6% 30.2% 40% No change (1,935.38 SF) (2,042.25 SF) (2,699.82 SF) FAR: No change 3,226 SF/ *3,397 SF/ 3,260 SF/ 0.48 FAR 0.50 FAR 0.48 FAR PARKING: No change No change Two covered in Two covered in garage garage (14'-6" x 21'-0") (20'-0" x 20'-0") + 1 unc. In + 1 unc. in driveway driveway HEIGHT: No change No change 20'-6" 30' /2 �/z stories Meets See code DH ENVELOPE: No change requirement Requirement ' Vanance granted on March 1"l, "lUUl tor tirst tloor side setbacK (1'-3 %z"" proposeci wriere 4"-U" is requirecl). Side setback variance no longer necessary with acquisition of 2'-6" X 150' parcel of land along east side property line, see attached judgement. Staff Comments: The Department of Public Works is requiring the applicant to provide a survey by a licensed land surveyor, and submit an application for a Lot Line Adjustment. See attached memo dated September 27, 2001. Staff would like to note that because of the nature of this request to amend a project that currently under construction, it is being brought forward directly to the action calendar. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 2 1?esign Review Amendment 2627 Easton Drive 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affumative action should be made by resolution and should include findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Depaxtment date stamped February 14, 2001, Sheets A1.1 through A4.4; except for the revisions documented on the plans date stamped September 10, 2001 reflecting the following changes: addition of bedroom window below existing bay and enlargement of existing bedroom windows on ground floor, enlargement of kitchen windows on second floor and relocation and enlargement of kitchen nook window on second floor; 2. that the conditions of the City Engineer's December 18, 2000, January 11, 2001, February 5, 2001 and September 27, 2001, and the Chief Building Official's February 5, 2001, and September 12, 2001 memos shall be met; 3. that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating window(s), adding a dormer(s), or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 4. that doors shall never be added in the master bedroom on the first floor to form a hall between the master bedroom and the offce and/or door shall never be placed at the entrance to the office area so that two separate bedrooms are created; and that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Catherine Keylon Planner c: CSS Architecture, Martin Dreiling, architect/applicant ROUTING FORM DATE: December 18, 2000 TO: CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for application for design review for a first and second story addition at 2627 Easton Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-195-150. SCHEDULED PLANIVING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, December 18, 2000 THANKS, Catherine/Erika/Maureen/Ruben/Sean 1. �' �o w � va.i t�+9 G. f1 �� : 2, ' `S �i�"`f J � o .y,��erc S . 3. �.c.t.ut�. / "t�►M�l-�/ �'�QJ�.� I�•s.�,! �,�� 0 �t �i / �i7 lo'w • s�`� � r � . � � �t � Date of Comments �✓ r�'n _.._. ,,,-.-..� � �a �� Q � /� �° " tl%� ��ll�-� �� o � ,,,�rve�aQ-e- �-' %��l � s �v� v . �,Qe_a.c.-c� �,,� h,1�dl�v � �`�� .x-'""'-_.. Fc�n.v . s ,�. �cA�i � ��QJ � %yt„� � � � �� r. ,I- �' t �►N � Ci� . �� j%' /� u,.. �.l� a / � � . � �.� ��k � � � �-a- � n �o �� (G� , %� � _ �� c`- � � �� v S� 6� � / �„ � w 0 � �.i �..i ._� ' , .. , ' ' ti . � �, . l , - a!�.. � . '3 1 ' - - . _..... . Y �., ,a.V �e,� . ...i.1:D-. . . • . � � <�'' �y � ° + ��. � , . ' . �,.7... , � � . .. ' ... � .i J� .. J 1� .V`�_ .�l �� ... � 4 ,-•o. . . .. . .i . �i ...`��,i �4 �.d ..,:�'. . . ,� . A., .' " �' $i._" , ,. i . , -t � . �'y� .. ,. rR - l ,�. � " J��,�» .: v:, t:.b�� , � � � '�n� , ...� .., ,.�, ^}, u � ,� ''� "�',. #,,, ...;,; :41 a �1 "'�s . .`�k� , �, , � ' S°S�'`� .,� . s' �g, „ Q :.:,�, ,Y �4 _ , •,t . 3, ., ` a <,s,er ` t a'. e / Z.P/J2,eJ � ��-k w- � ��c -� a � /�o v�'- - � n ro , �� - �� sf''y < � , � � bl 1 ... L t � ` . .� . . ," PF.,.' . .. � j � ` � '- . _.. � ��: .-. . . . , ..r } , .� „ , � r. `. .�.. � , ��+ � ... .. . �y � � . . ... .. :i � � �. ,�. i ,� . `t. ��. ,. � 1! w.. �.� � r . ...� r�� .. . - � + •., . �� .. . 4_ � ..._ . . ';! `. . q �•.,:« :: �:. . :..� .,.' .. �.. .y .y . ,� �, . . 1 • ,. '�, "t .'� . .a ._, � ,�`'- ., r .. � .:t r .. .. , „ „.. c .. ROUTING FORM �• z. DATE: TO: ✓ CITY ENGINEER CHIEF BLTILDING OFFICIAL FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUB.TECT: Request for design review, side setback variance and parking variance for a first and second story addition at 2627 Easton Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-195-150. STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, February 5, 2001 THANKS, Catherine/Erika/Maureen/Ruben/Sean 2 S�� Date of Comments . �� olo�a,� � 1� b o v w.e�«� :�w.e. w �. �'► - 1-� _J_ �.� � � t t�t+N °7�' t �' t�t/mp � w .t � a � �� C�P/ws I � �, � �- I.c�t.t�-.At�.e� ' �. ��-va.� I s f�,�.� � -� '� `� �o� �.� ��,�.�- ��.�- o � . �� s�, y d i v i c i` r�n ►n�tt.� . � �,�..� r.� SV� `..� MEMOR.ANDUM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT September 27, 2001 To: Planning Department � �— From: Engineering Department � Subject: Conditions for 2627 Easto Dri e 1. A property boundary survey shall be performed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. Applicant shall also submit a copy of the latest preliminary title report of the subject property. 2. Applicant shall submit a Lot Line Adjustment with lot closure calculations and a legal description of the proposed sewer easements to the Public Works Department - Engineering Division. Upon approval, applicant shall record the Lot Line Adjustment and the sewer easements in the County Recorder's Office and provide a copy of the same to the City. 3. The proposed sewer easements and the City's existing right-of-way shall be kept clear from any obstruction including fences to provide access for maintenance of City utilities. No permanent structures or fences shall be allowed in these areas. 4. The plans shall show the existing and proposed easements within the subject property. The proposed easements sha11 be labeled on the plan as sewer easements. 5. No trees shall be planted within the sewer easements and the City's right-of-way. Applicant shall obtain approval from the Public Works Department - Engineering Division for any work within these areas. 6. The site and roof drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage. 7. A sanitary sewer lateral test is required for the project in accordance with the City's standards. Cc: Larry Anderson, City Attorney U:�2627Easton.wpd ROUTING FORM DATE: TO: CITY ENGINEER �%CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUBJECT: Request for design review, side setback variance and parking variance for a first and second story addition at 2627 Easton Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-195-150. STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, February 5, 2001 THANKS, Catherine/Erika/Maureen/Ruben/Sean � s o' Date of Comments til �,��w u, ��a c.vs a�' c�cc�- ��t �� w�-e c✓ � �/ � s/P.rs � �r �1✓'oe �e�� u-�, ;�J�v�?�'1�"f� !/yP� l�10� �5 a`rj' ��7G`" 00✓� 17 �^C a l9�-Q S ,�% B�OP�/v� f5 �� E''"�I ��'j1 �'i `�''� �"' �f ! ��I�S � �Nf /'%v�r CO�l1/Erf�OM � �G�''/ `aU`1��''/ /' G6'�5 ��'o '�� oo-W,s �ra o P� ��e o�s�6JP. 6c� 7 n d� � �� ROUTING FORM DATE: September 11, 2001 TO: _Ciry Engineer ✓� Chief Building Official Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for design review amendment for a first and second story addition at 2627 Easton Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-195-150. ROUTING FORM DATE: December 18, 2000 TO: CITY ENGINEER CffiEF BLJILDING OFFICIAL FIRE MARSHAL SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUB.TECT: Request for application for design review for a first and second story _ addition at 2627 Easton Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-195-150. SCHEDULED PLANI�IING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING: STAFF REVIEW BY MEETING ON: Monday, December 18, 2000 THANKS, Catherine/Erika/Maureen/Ruben/Sean �Ib � I"�� j Date of Comments n � � �p"�% � ' `��J��L'"�-.`•Q �' � (�� w . � e V �� rj `i�-L.�� Ls�- L'�'.�l'� �'��-'V'C.,Q��'Yl�-� `�'� J,,.�^„'-,�-�, J � � L � - .� �. '��, .. �� _: �. � . ,s�,�. ,,..� ._ DATE: September 11, 2001 TO: ✓City Engineer ,: _Chief Building Official Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist Sr. Landscape Inspector _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for design review amendment for a first and second story addition at 2627 Easton Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-195-150. City of Burlingame Planriing Commission Minutes March 12, 2001 Chairman Luzuriaga set the public hearing for the March 26, 2001, action calendar. This item concluded at 7:25 p.m. 2. 1447 BURLINGAME AVENUE — ZONED C-1 SUBAREA A— APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR A FULL-SERVICE RESTAURANT (IQBAL SERANG, ARCHITECT; ELIO D. URZO, APPLICANT; BANK OF AMERCIA NT SA ET AL, PROPERTY OWNER) CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: there is some suggestion of signage on the plans, want to make sure applicant is aware of the sign code and that their action does not address signage; application notes that the objective is to provide delivery service for food, could applicant expand on this, are they providing parking for delivery trucks, if so, where; applicant proposes to provide cooking classes in the afternoon, can they do that and if so, how many people will be on site; the area of the restaurant is expanding quite a bit, is the number of employees shown correct; the application states that there will be 75 people on site at any one time, do we have a study on the number of public parking spaces available in that area after 5:00 p.m.; provide information on where all the employees of current business park. There were no further questions and the item was set for action on March 26, 2001 provided all the information can be submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department in time. This item concluded at 7:30 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE. THEYARE ACTED ON SIMULTANEOiISLY UNLESS SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION IS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT, A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC OR A COMMISSIONER PRIOR TO THE TIME THE COMMISSION VOTES ON THE MOTION TO ADOPT. Chairman Luzuriaga asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. Commissioner Dreiling noted that he will abstain from voting on the item at 2627 Easton Drive because he has a business relationship with the applicant. 3A. 2627 EASTON DRIVE - ZONED R 1- APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION (MARTIN DREILING, CSS ARCHITECTURE, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; TRICIA GODOWSKI, PROPERTY OWNERI 3B. 164 PEPPER AVENUE - ZONED R 1- APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION AND A NEW DETACHED GARAGE (RANDY GRANGE, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; GREGG AND KRIS HURLEY, PROPERTY OWNERS) C. Keighran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report, commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Bojues. Chair called for a voice vote on the motion; Item 3a, 2627 Easton Drive passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Dreiling abstaining) and #3b, 164 Pepper Avenue passed 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. � � City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS February 26, 2001 2627 EASTON DRIVE - ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SIDE SETBACK AND PARKING VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION (MARTIN DREILING, CSS ARCHITECTURE, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; TRICIA GODOWSKI, PROPERTY OWNERL(CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 12, 2001 MEETINGI CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. C. Dreiling noted that he would abstain from this item because of a business relationship with the applicant, he stepped down from the dias. Commission asked that the staff report indicates a total of five bedrooms, but only sees four. Staff noted that the proposed office off the master bedroom qualifies as a potential bedroom because of the hallway access. Chairman Luzuriaga opened the public comment. Richard Terrones, CSS Architecture, was present to answer questions, noted delayed action from last meeting to simplify the application, eliminated the problem with the egress windows in the basement level, existing windows can be replaced with egress qualified windows within the same size opening; office is the fi$h bedroom, do not agree with staff determination but will accept and asked for parking variance, will be difficult to use the office as a bedroom and keep the privacy for the master bedroom, would like to provide the office as an auxilary space to the bedroom; side setback variance is to extend an existing nonconforming wall; there is potential mitigation in the future for the side setback, property owner has applied to transfer 5' wide strip of property along left side property line, could take up to one year to complete the transfer, this area houses sewer and water lines but was never deeded to the City. Commission asked the applicant if there is any way to open up the wall in the office by more than 50% so that it does not qualify as a bedroom, suggested switching the location of the office and bathroom; the applicant noted that it was considered but that it would complicate the floor plan, would make the office too open, and the bathroom would have an odd configuration and size. Commissioners noted: the FAR is being decreased with this remodel, there is an inconsistency in the roof and floor plans, roof plan shows a new projecting bay along the left side of the house. Applicant agreed and will revise the roof plan so that it reflects the floor plan. There were no other comments from the floor and Chairman Luzuriaga closed the public hearing. Commission noted that this is an excellent project, the side setback variance is warranted since it is only a 7' extension of an existing wall, there will be no openings in the extension; the parking variance is moot since one has to walk through the master bedroom to get into the office, only see 4 bedrooms, someone could convert this office into a bedroom in the future, but that would be illegal. C. Deal moved to place this item on the consent calendar for the meeting of March 12, 2001. The motion was seconded by C. Bojues. Comment on motion: should add condition that doors shall never be added in the master bedroom to form a hall which would create two separate bedrooms. The maker and second of the motion agreed to the amendment. Chairman Luzuriaga called for a voice vote on the amended motion to place this item on the March 12, 2001, consent calendar with the suggested conditions. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-1-1 (C. Dreiling abstaining and C. Keighran absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:25 p.m. 0 Sent By: CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING; 650 696 3790; Sep-5-01 8:43AM; Page 2/2 CIIY UF tiURLMGAMG PLANNWG DEPAItTMBNT SOi PRIMROSE ROAD P(65Q) 556-715(i F(650} 6%•3790 1 Y e ♦ � APP�rCATYON TQ THE P�,ANN�N�G COMII�IISSION ��w f Ty�e of application: Uesign Review� Couditionai'Use Pernut Variauce Special Perrnit Other Parcel Nurnber: Project�ddress: a�� GtS-i�h �� V� �JV1��1�1allrv�P � �`i'� �� i ' APPLICANT NamC: � S S I'iTG�{ G-�1^e Address• �,�� u �'I'� �l I�iV�. Ciiy/St�ce/7..ip: UY�IVL0.1GiYvsPTC��O Phone (w):��O�SDi i�1�n • l2-Da (h): ��. (�s��}3 - 9�e�s" Al2CHITECT/DESICNER Name: CS� �CC�-+iCC� mdU'��i Vl Address: � 3 � U1�1X`11-� City/statc/zip: ' b� Pl�one (w): � b • • ! �-�S O c��: (fl: (n Sa � 3 • ��" RECEIVED SEP 1 0 2001 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING� DEPT. � 1 know about the proposed applicaliur�aud hereby authorize i�r� abUve applieaut lo submi� thi5 appiicalion to !he Planning Commissi�. � � ��-� ; j � Property owner's signature: � �% % � ; � ; �`��2�te: , ; Date submitted: PIZOPERTY OW1vER Name: " I Y i U�- G o� DvU �/ Address: �-�o� �% �Gt�i'�v1_ � i lr� CitylStnte/Zip: � �� Phone (w): � � " � � � ��; 3� a -� [� S l �: a -n il ce � _ ��Uv �� J Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person far this project. PCAPP.FRM AFFAAAVXxYSXCNATURE: I hereby certify under enalty of perjury that fihe information given herein is true and correct lo ihe best of my kno edgc and belief. Applicanl's signature: !• '�.7ate: � e � September 10, 2001 City Of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010 re: Revised Design Review Application Re: 2627 Eastnn Drive � ARCHITECTU� � f RECEIVED SEP 1 0 2001 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. We are submittfng this application for minor revisions to the east wall of the previously approved residence at 2627 Easton Drive. Please recall that this parcel was originally understood to include a 5' easement at the east property line that generated an adequate setback to allow window modifications at this wall. During the original design review, it was discovered that the easement did not exist and was, in fact, a parcel that had been dedicated for easement but never actually recorded. The parcel was not deeded to 2627 Easton. As a result, our original Design review Application included replacement of these windows, but no change in size or location was allowed. Additionally, the lower bedroom windows were not allowed to be added. The owner of 2627 Easton has recently completed a Quiet Title for the parcel and the court has judged that 2'6" of the parcel is now deeded to 2627 Easton. That judgment is included for reference. - _ This judgment now removes the UBC setback restriction and makes modification of the windows Fossible. We are submitting revised plans showing the windows as originally intended. This revision does not affect Lot Coverage or FAR in any way. ' Revisions include: • Relocation and enlargement of existing alumi�um kitchen window. • Enlargement of kitchen nook window � • Enlargement of lower bedroom windows • Addition of lower bedroom window below existing bay. Sincerely, Martin Dreiling CSS Architecture P Cc: �ricia Godowski C S S A S S O C I A T E S A R C H I T E C T S I 1 0 3 J u a n i t a A v e n u e B u r I i n g a m e. C A 9 4 0 1 0 • 6•50 696 1200 • 343 9685 fax d r e i I i n g @ p o c b e I I. n e f ¢ s .ry: CARR McCLELLAN I 2 3 4 s G ? 8 9 IO 11 I2 13 14 IS I6 17 I8 l9 20 21 22 2� 24 25 �6 �� 28 ;,,., 650 342 7885; 08/14/01�5:13P�;,J� #369;Page 2/3 � Cr W. Gcorge Wailes, Esq. (Bar No. 100435) MicheIle Leu Zaccone, Esq. (Bar No. 188544) Christopher y. Shenfield, Esq. (Bar No. 184274) CARR, McCLELLAN,INGERSOLL, THOMPSpN & T�ORN Professionai Corporation 216 Park Road 1°,0. �ox SI3 Burlin�ame, CaIifornia �4011-0513 Telephone: (650) 342-9600 Facsiinile: (650) 342-7685 Attorneys for Plaint�#�'s Paul ]. Godowski and Pauicia Smith Godowski RE�EIVED SEP 1 0 2001 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. ��dneEc� a,,,,�ED AUG 0 7 Z001 �Clerkof the St��Court oeprmro�c SUPERIOR CQURT OF CA�,IF�RNIA C4UNTY OF SAN MATBO PAUL J. GODOWSKT and PATRICIA SMITH GODOWSKI, Trustees of the Godowski Family Trust, dated July 29, ] 999, Plaintifis, ►��! ANS�L M. EASTON and LOUISE A. EASTON, individuals; CHARLES T. RODOLPH and CARRIE M. RQ�OLPH, individuals; SUZANNE E. BRYAN, an �ndi�vidual; PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a corporation; CITY OF BU'�2LINGAME, a municipal Corporation; and all persons unknown alaiming any legal or equita,ble right, titic, estate, Iien or interest in the property in the complaint adverse to Plaintif�s' title or an� cloud on Plaintiffs' title; and DOES 1 through 30, Defendants. -' i 4�3.00001 U]GLJ b i� I I 0�244. ] No. 416271 Action Fi]ed: March 21, 2001 JU�DGMENT ON DEFAULT BY COURT [Code Civ. Prac. Section S85 (c�] Jud�acnt on Default by Court � .ry: CARR McCLELLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 11 l2 13 14 i l5 16 17 l8 19 20 21 22 23 z4 ZS 26 2'� 28 �.�_ 650 342 7685; OB/14/0�5:13PM;,J�fax #369;Page 3/3 In this action, pefendants Anscl M. F�aston and Louise A. Easton, Charles T. Rodolph and Came M. Rodolph and all persons unkn�wa claiming any legal or cquit�bl¢ right, title, estate, lien or intcrest in the propeny described in ihe complaint adverse to Plsintiffs' title or any cloud an 1'laintiffs' title having bcen served with the summons and complaint by publication, bavir�� failed to appear and answer the complaint within thc time allowed by law, and their default having been duly �ntered, Defendannts Suzanne E, $ryan and City of Burlingame baving becn served and having failed to appear and answer the complaim within the time allowed by� law, and their d�fault havin� been dt,tip ontered, and Defendant Pacific Gas and Blectric Company having beon served and having entered inta a stipulation with the Godowskis for a judgmcnt quieting title in fa�vor of the Godowskis, and Plaintiffs Pau! J. Godowski and Patricia Smith Godo�ski, Trustees of the Gadow�ki Family Trust dated July 29, 1999 ("the Godowskis") having applied to ' the Court for judgment, The Court, pursuant to dectarations preseribed by Code of Civil Procedure section 585(c) on file in this case and considered by the Court, now orders the following judgment: IT IS ORDERED that the Godowskis are thc sole fee awrrers of the southwesterly one- half of an approximataly five�foot strip of !and ("Alleqvvay"), lying ��ithin Z621 Easton brive and 2627 Easton Drive, Burlin�ame, San Mateo County, Califomia described in the complaint and that Defendants have no right, title or interest in the property adverse to the Godowskis, except for the sewer easezn.ents held by the Ciiy of Burlingame and the utility easement held by Pacific Gas and �lectric Company. r?ated: o � � �oN.�ora�w, AUNDE �... .... JUDGE OF THE SUFERIOR COtiJRT .21423.00007 \B[3L181\ l t OV?.�s. i 2 Judgment on 17efault by Coun �� c�ry o� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD I,:, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 o, • _ ,: i TEL: (o5C) 558-7250 2627 EASTON DRIVE Application for design review amendment for an approved first and second story addition pUBLIC HEARING at 2627 Easton Drive, zoned R-1. NOTICE (APN: 027-195-150) The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Tuesdav, October 9, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed September 28, 2001 (Please refer to otl2er side) CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy of the application and plans for this;project may be reviewed prior r_o the meeting at tlze Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in co�irt, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city �� at �r prior t� th� pu�lic heai�ing. �� Property ow�ers who receive this notice are responsible for iti�orming their tenants abo�t this "notice: For additional�� information, ple�se call (650) 558-7250. '�hank you �,�� .. � �� -. - . '. ' m ' ��„ � �� °� �' � �: ' Margaret Mon�o��:� � ��" •' �� %� s t. Ciry Planner �� `� ' � �� PUBLIC� HEARING :NOTICE (Please refer to other side) � RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desi review amendment to change windows along the east side for a first floor and second floor addition at 2627 Easton Drive, zoned R-1, Tricia Godowski, property owners, APN: 027-195-150; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on October 9, 2001, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class 1-(e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the shuctures before the addition, is hereby approved. � 2. Said design review amendment is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review amendment are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Joe Bojues , Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of October , 2001 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and variance. 2627 Easton Drive effective October 15, 2001 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped February 14, 2001, Sheets A1.1 through A4.4; except for the revisions documented on the plans date stamped September 10, 2001 reflecting the following changes: addition of bedroom window below existing bay and enlargement of existing bedroom windows on ground floor, enlargement of kitchen windows on second floor and relocation and enlargement of kitchen nook window on second floor; 2. that the conditions of the City Engineer's December 18, 2000, January 11, 2001, February 5, 2001 and September 27, 2001, and the Chief Building Ofiicial's February 5, 2001, and September 12, 2001 memos shall be met; 3. that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating window(s), adding a dormer(s), or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 4. that doors shall never be added in the master bedroom on the first floor to form a hall between the master bedroom and the of�ce and/or door shall never be placed at the entrance to the office area so that two separate bedrooms are created; and 5. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. , ��A,a .. ,� r v r„� . Y��Z' . � � �sw%X � r.� �'� �� .� '� �..� ��; „tiw. �i* � �� "� _ � � � '�' ,� � „� "�! � � � . - , � �'- � � �1 . . ,� � �,.f r� �F�'"�. � � �i, �.« �� `p � � � 9 � 4; Y3� '� ��F i 9 �; y.�±� #� �rt� x �", ' �. , : � '� '+s ^� ` ,� � � �� . � ' �� .. � � ,,�' "- ` � ` °� � Y 4 / * ` F- � ��a" "'�v � � • s � � � " �£�'„ , z: . - � - ��'.. �Y� s `r' �. : r - 'F�';. ,. i r �,: o.b�� $� �� d�n, � . � ,� �r � � �a- . ,. E _' �'�c. �� , , � i�, �� r{� .. ,� � �, `< �� , 5 � � "`t,4; � �' . . � � + �,Y F > v a � �_�� m � J,- �, 4 ": . ��°� ., . " �.'�% y, � �, � �, �, A' . � ._ .�T� ,�� • y � K � � � ^ � �' "; "` �� t� - � �+, i: � � '� { R ,:� � ,", * �_ �b,� s � . � ��, � e �,k-� ,._ .'� "t' � p - �� a� i n � s ,(� �� s�,9,-'�v � � ��,- � � � x ` 1 . `� . �� f� 4 � �,iy �� " + � 4 io ,p r . � �`.� �� .. �� K w.:➢' � . � +v' ^ �. � ^� . �y rl�� y�r �`m �. # � §`� � °� .� , '�"� e � • ,� * r r . f � n x ,g -�,+ � � �� ; � a �� ,� �, � � ,� .�� - a � �� ;� � � � *� � �� .� - �iy �- �` Tr � �.�';�ry .R :��;� ' /- . k ,.1� � � �K, xF.ea,.. .i�. � _ �i �p � • �S3 n �`&�a �� .f�b ,� �� .�� o� .� � �`�x �� , � � . - � -� y �. .... k . , yy4.�,� � . '�"� .. � � �,,�-4y M n$'$ n . . q, . a ,Q � �' �`�«' s�; � , �", � . g y � �� [ � �' � ,� � �� .. . l' f+ � �'� �'9,�, . � � '��8, � �` •Ra,. .. � � e m ,� '"W y,9� . �� ` � x � ! a'.� .. � � ,pG �''� a� ;, .. � �'•. . , • � ,y y 3 �s � � ' � v,� " �„ /� �+�� J � " , �sa . . & . ,� �p� � ;. '�. '� .� � � 1/1 5 � tw-�� , �� ,� � '� . � �C�c ., K �" a � �` �„ �� f� ��- ? � g � _5 d;� z� ''R �t � a � ^,�qbe�,. � �� `"` � "� � , g � .,�;,, *° " t � .� w � � ��'A� . - - .. � ,%'- � � 'R ,,�«'� ,, ,� � '� �5,� #�� . �,.� M 4 �£ � `�� 3 � � -� � �. ° „ �.:: ' yy��',� � "�� ;� � : -"+�� ` �j '��. �°y, �- ' �'�s.r�� `�`��,, � t �* ��,�' �r ?� , _ � � � _. �5 _f ��,� .,"� �> � a '`s �. a� � �F �� "��'� � �' � �� , �` e,� �+,,, � � � �:�^�., �,t�„ '" � . ,a��* �..�'' 2 . .,, _� '�' � . � ,}r . � , " � < � �� s« � , . ,�' � A F � ` .. y� � `6�� • (/ � d t =* ` ` .• ` a ,�t` �;�� e � �� - k � � � �� o ,� �� :��. �� d t ,� � � �� o �� =+,� � .'� ,� �ry , � ' ��,= � �' . � �� s ' � �+� .Iy� �� y �:a' . � . . . � � � 'S�°' �"° � e',>m ��." " a._,,....... >°' <.,- ��`. .. , . � ` .,._ �.. i,�^a f '1 �fy�X `iw��,W �� . . ' � . a � r v � � � ,�` '� r�� ':� �*r ��,$ ,� ' „� °. �,� `" ,..+ �, w � , �7k �_ ��;�e � �� 3 ,• �I e . y � ,� ` � ...w .A ��:. ��..� .,3 �i ��" , _S �' �� ' . � . � •ybetl � �z� `�� ° A . �.*..D .. , �� r. . � .. sw '1 " �„_ r �� , � �� s� � .. �� _/ , " " * � � �, � . � y_.. �+' ;,� . x� �@.� � �. , . � � _.- '� f � a , u 'd�� F . A � y�,. .., i* �"tifK `^�,',::: .. �� ,',,�' � � �*'�„« ��„ t� F" ,,� �, �� r j��; . � � ` � � � ,%. �s�� ,� � , ,, ,:. nh. - �� :� � ,; � �oa�; �"" '�ts r a ,� �.�,\` � �' - � ,�`s° : �-�' y � � ��,.,.",. _ � ' -�,:. ,� � .�"`,�" ;� � t ° `� �,� ; � �;,��" � �\ � . �✓i.i�` . ; s : � a$. w Ss 'yy�.' � �"gY ��, . ' � . . ,� � .. � , z �'t � , � '�°� ^ , �' � � - � „ - 3� � >� s �.�'-' u��_- ��"� � � � ,,,.�,. '�� ' �� ' ,.. � x � �� ` � �,. , +4� �e � v +� �` � +�` '`�, � � i s �� > : � �- � . �±f �� •`�` � � "� �k =; c >, �b �" s , ,��