HomeMy WebLinkAbout2316 Easton Dr - Staff Report! '4
li i� ? ? •
_��""'^---�..__'
P.C. 7/27/87
Item # 3
MEMO T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: CITY PLANNER
SUBJECT; THREE SPECIAL PERMITS FOR A 441 SF DETACHED GARAGE
AT 2316 EASTON DRIVE, ZONED R-1
Pamela Stearns is requesting three special permits in order to replace
the existing detached garage with a new 21' x 21' detached garage in
the rear 30g of the residential property at 2316 Easton Drive, zoned
R-1. The three special �ermits are ior: (1) storage area whicn exceeds
10� of the gross floor area of the main structure (277 SF requested,
266 SF allowed); (2) windows within 10' of property line (3'-2"
requested, 10' required); and (3) windows over 10' above grade (11'
requested, 10' allowed) (Cocle Sec. 25.60.010 i& 1). The garage is
designed with four dormer windows in the storage area or loft above tne
par}cing. These dormers allow more of the ceiling height of the pitched
roofed garage to be 4' above tne floor. The garage design meets all
other zoning requirements for setbacks, lot coverage and height.
Staff Review
City staff have reviewed the proposed garage. The Chief Building
Inspector (June 29, 1987 memo) and the Fire Marshal (June 29, 1987
memo) had no comment. The City Engineer (June 22, 1987 memo)
identifies that he has no objections because the placemenc of the
garage leaves 15' in the area between the sidewalk and the face of the
garage. In addition an exis'ting side property line fence is set pack
8' to 9' clear af the sidewalk so sight lines from and of backing cars
are not blocked.
Planning staff would note that there is presently a covered patio
attaching the house to the existing garage. The project will include
removal of this patio cover. It will be replaced with a smaller
trellis which will be attached to the hause but not to the garage.
Applicant's Letter
In her letter of June 17, 1987 the applicant states that the reas�n for
adding the dormer windows is to increase the usable storage area in the
loft area of the garage. (Not-e: The interior clear height in the loft
with the dormers is about 4' floor to ceiling ridge poles.) They are
planning a family and storage space inside the house is limited. The
garage loft area will not be used as a living area since the ceiling
height is 4'. The dormer windows on the property line side of the
garage look onto an easement adjacent to their property. (There is a
7' wide easement along the rear property line of this corner lot, see
parcel map.)
�
-2-
Study Questions
The Planning Commission reviewed this item at t:neir szudy meeting on
July 13, 1987 and asked several questions (Planning Commission Minutes,
July 13, 1987). The side setbacl� requirements for this corner lot are
7.5'. In an additional letter (July 15, 1987) the applicant states
that the purpose of the dormer windows is to make the space in the
garage attic more accessible and thereby increase the usable storage
area. She also states that the dormer windows will enhance the
appearance of the garage. The style of the house is �eorgian; there
are no dormers on the house.
Planninq Commission Action
The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative
action should r�e taken by resolution. Tne reasons for any action
should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following
conditions should be considered:
l. that the conditions of the City Engineer's June 22, 1987 memo shall
be met;
2. that as built the new detached garage and addition to the house
shall be consistent with the plans submitted to the Planning
Department and date stamped July 8, 1987; and
3. that no portion of the garage shall ever be used as a dwelling unit
and no utilities except electricity shall be extended to the
garage.
������
A'largare� Monroe
City Planner
MM/s
cc: Pamela Stearns
Jerry Deal, JD & Associates
PROJECT APPLICATION ���°'�` °� 2316 EASTON DRIVE
�r CEQA ASSESSMENT BURLINGAME iPro;e�t address _
� � ��
/ ) b�,ReW �•-° Project name - if any
Application received ( 6/19 87
Staff review/acceptance ( 6/29/$7 )
1. APPLICANT Pamel a Stearns 344-6491
name telephone no.
2316 Easton Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010
applicant s address: street, city, zip code
Same
contact person, if different telephone no.
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION
Specia.l Perr.;it (X ) Variance* O Ccndominium Pernit O Other
*Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Three SPECIAL PERMITS for a detached 441 SF garage which (1) wi11
have 277 SF of storage area where 266 SF (10% of gross floor area
of main dwelling) are allowed; (2) will have windows within 10'
of property lines and (3) will have windows more than 10' above
grade. The project meets all other zoning requirements for
setbacks, lot coveraqe and heipht.
(attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed)
Ref. code section(s): (25..:60.01.0-i ) (25.60.010-1 )
Richard and Pamela Stearns � 2316 Easton Drive
land owner's name addres
Bur�lingame, CA 94010
Renuired Date received city zip code
(3�e� (no) ( - ). Proof of ownershin
(�€�j. (no) ( - �) Owner's consent to a�plication
5. EXISTIPIG SITE CONDITIONS
Old garage (approximately 420 SF) and concrete driveway. _
Existing garage is attac ed to et ouse y a covere
patio.
a. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
( 027-153-180 >( 21 )( 60 >( Easton Add. No. 7 �
APN lot no. block no. subdivision name
('�� R-1 ) ( 6,478 ) ����,
zoning district land area, square feet
Required Date received
(yes) (rrc�) ( 6/19/87)
�Yes) ���) � �� )
iYes) (��) ( " )
(yes) (no) ( )
(other) ( " )
6
*Per Code Sec. 25.66.060
a detached garage in the
rear 30% of a lot may be
built to the rear or side
lot lines.
Site plan shov�ing: property lines; public sidewall;s and
curbs; all structures and improvements;
paved on-site parkino; landscaping.
Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area
by tyoe of us�`on each floor plan.
Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant).
Site cross section(s) (if relevant).
_1etter of exnlanation
*Land use classifications are: residential (show # dwelling units); office use; retail
sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousin9; other (to be described).
PRo�ECT PPOPosA� (GARAGE ADDITI0�1 ONLY)
Proposed censi:ruction, Qelo4r qrade ( - SF) Second floor ( - SF)
gross floor area First floor ( 44 1 SF) Third floor ( - SF)
Project Code Project Code
Pr000sal Requirem�ni. Proposal Requirement
Front setback ]�'± j5 ` 1111 n Lot covera� e 33% 40% max.
Side setback* j]' Q' Ruild�no height ].3' 14' max.
Side yard 11' -6" 7-1/2' P1 ate hei ght 7' -4" 10' max.
P,ear yard * - �' On •;ite nk�.spaces 2 2
6. PROJECT PRDPOSAL (continued) '
full time employees on site
Part time emoloyees on site
Visitors/customers (weekday)
Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.)
Residents on property
Trin ends to/from site*
Peak hour trip ends*
Trucks/service vehicles
EXISTING IP! 2 YEARS IP! 5 YEARS
after � after after
8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM
*Show calculations on reverse side or attach seoarate sheet.
� �
7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES
Residential uses`on. all adjacent �ots.. This.use conform.s
to the General Plan..
Required Date received
(yes) (no) ( ) Location plan of adjacent properties.
(yes) (no) ( ) Other tenants/firms on property:
no. firms ( ) no. employees ( )
floor area occupied ( SF office space)
( SF other)
no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( )
no. comoany vehicles at this location ( )
8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 ( X) Other application type, fee � ()
Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 () Project Assessment $ 25 ()
Variance/other districts $ 75 () Neoative Declaration $ 25 (�)
Condominium Permit $ 50 () EIR/City & consultant fees $ ()
TOTAL FEES $.x5�.�� RECEIPT N0, ]�$$99 Received by �,Kranitskv
I hereby certify�nder penalty of� perjury that the information given herein is
true and correct to the bes �.of nowledge and belief.
� ,� /� h. � � (j' ' d
Signature \���{.�iL �-- 'i�t_ Date��'— /l,jl
' Applicant � � ✓
f
STAFF USE OPlLY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION F;,e "°.
The City of Burlingame by on , 19_
completed a review of the proposed project and determined that:
( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment.
( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Reasons for a Conclusion:
CategoricaTly-exempt - Reference
C:ode Sec. I5301. Existing Facilities
r0 . �dY1GC�.� l; �1U �Q���z..
Sign �ure of Processing Official �Title Da' Signed
Unless oppealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the determination shall be final.
DECLARATION OF POSTING Dace Posted:
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am City Clerk oP the City of Burlingame and that
I oosted a true copy of the above Neoa.ti�re Declaration at the City Hall of said City near
the doors to th� Council Chambers.
Executed at ¢urlingame, California on
Apoealed: ( )Yes ( )P:o
19 .
JUD TH . MALFATTI, CITY CLERK, CITY �!� oURLINGP.h1E
STAFF REVI EW
1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION
Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by:
date circulated renly received
City Engineer ( (�],9�8:] ) (yes) (no)
Building Inspector ( " ) (yes) (no)
Fire Marshal ( " ) (yes) (no)
Park Department ( - ) (yes) (no)
City Attorney ( — ) (yes) (no)
memo attached
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
(yes) (no)
2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASUP.ES
Concerns Mitigation Measures
Do the plans comply with all Request comments from the the
Fire and Building Code Fire Marshal.and Chief Bldg.
requirements? Inspector.
Will the proposal have any Review site; notice neighbors;
negative effects on neighboring review at-public hearing.
properties in terms of invading
privacy or blocking views?
3. CEQA REQUIREMEPlTS
If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project:
i5 the project subject to CEQA review? No - categorically exempt
IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED:
Initial Study comoleted
Decisioti to prepare EIR
Notices of preparation mailed
RFP to consultants
Contract awarded
Admin. draft EIR received
Draft EIR accepted by staff
Circulation to other agencies
Study by P.C.
Review period ends
Public hearing by P.C.
Final EIR received by P.C.
Certification by Council
Decision on project
Notice of Determination
4. APPLICATION STATUS Date first received ( Fzf 19/87 )
Accepted as complete: no( ) letter to applicant advising info. required ( )
Yes( ) date P.C. study ( 7/13/$7 )
Is application ready for a public hearing? �(yes) (no) Recommended date ( j/,j %�,��` ')
Date staff reoort mailed applicant (�7/;� ��?) Date Commission hearing (7/.<'7 �(� )
Application approved ( ) Denied' ( ) Appeal to Council (yes) no
Date Council hearing ( ) Aoolication aporoved ( ) Denied ( )
'1 � �� 8�
signed date
Pamela L. Stearns
2316 EASTON DRtWE • BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
. �_ fi�:�$._ � ! j � / � (
, ,/� � '. �
i�� , ����l���
,
� ��� �, � 1���
/�'�'�`� , Ci �Y O�a�e�,t�L�E�aiME
�
�,,:,�,, �,�,�. �.-- � � ��..�
(��sus v�- �-- I� � �- � ���- �o �
,�,,�:�..c,� �; � l�- �- �-
�-lu,�._ l��-o-� r.�/ �a C�-ac��.
�`n" �. �- ��..��.- �.
�```�" � � �.�.. � .
�'�``� . /`�
�� u �.- � �.
;� ��. � �=c� �z- G r�.�.. c,..�
�,. �w..�,� �. , ��-�- � � ,�.� ��.�:.
� �.u.�- � � �- u.�... .
�
� �� �� �
�,�,�� � � � �
��..� � � � �.. ` �- �
.
� �-�- �� ' .�.. � �
� `
`�`�,
���-
DATE: �U/� i �l', �qd��
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUILDING INSPECI"OR
FIRE MARSH/�L
DIRECTOR OF PARKS
FROM: PLP,NPaING DEPARTMENT
C �
S U B � E C T: � f� -�'`�' `�.f �--t' O�i'i`t7Ur 1'' ;�> �f 'J CC �.tk J�CGC.:�U� , f G�-�'f �r�'.. %�`.� .�"y�
� ,,..,.��
'23/r ��s'��1 �//�c �1 �,����',��� :t/�'o<�.�;:��� ,S7�G.�q� ��^� � �'G'-�..5�
/_///�i)C�Bt.f.�J G//i �i,../ � ✓ �C% '� /" � ,�-�'P C' Ei� "i/ ,/ ' /"'..-� / �
% � ./� : /� ... � �+K.�' �' c�' t-s--, r.�� `i?-t
�i, ��aGvs -'`%� o-z.� �'� c� � ,-�, �` �� .��' c��.� n �/�' �S � c.� _ �..�
An application has been received for the above pro�ect for review by the
Planning Commission. The aoplicatinn will be scheduled for _��'��`_
at their �%� _c� / , f� _ meeti ng. We would appreciate having
--��� �7—
your comments by ;, �L �j /�% `�''",�''
��--�-__-� --{ � �� 9 � �"
Thank you. � � `
/�' � � C�' !� so r n. i
�
� C.� v �%��� �
i��
�'�a,;r��:.,
�
�
,
r
. � `
����
,I
DATE: �U/1Q % �I, /�'/�� —
�—
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUILDING I CTOR
FIRE MARSHAL
DIRECTOR OF PARKS
FROM:' PLP,NNING DEPARTMEN7 �
S U B J E C T: �j�N�( �-t' �i'�/'�i?t.� / S_��✓J G� C.C,t' �� t����/(�/ ' G�i? G�% �� ;� ..
0
.�3/6 ��s�� ��t�� � �C� ���� ��c/ �5f�c��'� �1--� � ��`�' :
,k'C �` C�l/1��.�s,.
Gi�i �a''6'�!/S Gv� '� `� /d � t'? ��' �. � c.',���'/�-�r' ,/ " ,��'" a �_.,�� � �S.S
��i'�lcf'�G�/�' /Z �' � c./ `���
L��� CI dif /�%,� C.i' ��Ciy/,� � �t/%G7 � -( -
An application has been received for the above project for review by the
Planning Commission. �he application will be scheduled for
at their�%�,�/ f ,J�"f��_meeting. We would appreciate having
�-- �
your comments bv_ -• t�`t �j /y��`' "� ,
-----t-----
Tnank you.
►� ot�a�cc�.a�v F�eo�n.. ��P.i. w►�t�L�--
6 -z.�+ '�r 7
3^M
���z��,�..
�
DATE: �(J/l.Q / �I, %�%j'�
.. --
MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER
CHIEF BUILDIPdG INSPECTOP
FIRE hSARSHP,L
DIf2ECTOR OF PARKS
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: (>���`,,/�CX_.� �F'�/Ir�ra1`-..�
Ct G�,,,� f G.C:�L�.: (:f
��''� r�` �G`� ��
���P c-�tSiJ�% �� �% C'��.t��i�E'r:�� �i/fL'J,�,G�`�%�",� .Slv/CG��' r�.%.r
G��:�a'6�r�riS' �vf�Y��� /� f ,'', f' ���"'��.���'���1�-�/= �°.��,..�'" �rd�---��
li'i'��'DGr/_C' �"�6'-T1� %�'a � /!� � C�' �li�r[°7 �-`�r/'%rx. C�_..�� _
An application has been received for the above pro�ect for review by the
� � ���
��' �``S
Planning Commission. The applicat�on will be scheduled for
at their /���/ /,j, /%�rj' meeting. We would appreciate having
.�
your comments by �- ;,i� 6 /%�=�"�
—�'
Thank you.
� , �
/ � i /���.?1>!� /��/�
, %�� � ��� ln��''l�� ��T
� '�' / � �
� ��,av�,;._ .
�� �� ���
�
�
'�Ic� G�� � � � ��r� � . ; = �. � ��./-c� � ,
� ��� ,
��'� . � �%�' �"Le� / ��L% E���-�'� G��
/ ' � � /' �� / '�� . .
� '�'�, �%�� �%"i`"��s2� C.�u�-GLG�- % J��a'--Ei� -��i�t�'�
/�/�� /�
`p � ,� ,, �`�� ''����� . ��� �t�--�1`�
� U�"��� ! "' C� d",�7 � � �C : .
�
' �� ��1�-��� /��,� �� ���f���� �
� � G�� 9
� � � � y ` /�� f;���i�
��t;��� ���/ ���� �j � � G��1 _
<- f E
�°,,�� �� '� � ����a'���
� �� �° /C���' � �'G"°"`"�i�r� �� �ir:'G �'� �' �'�' j
� � �.
� �� ����F��--��'��,,������� `
��
��
�� � >�-��'
�_��1� ,�� S ��� �� � �� �
�
; ._ .__._._t_.r.---- ._.,_.., ._._._�..�..a. �
�_
COVERED PATIO CONNECTING EXISTING GARAGE TO HOUSE
Per phone conversation to project designer, Jerry Deal,
this covered patio will be removed along with the
existing garage, (7/6/87 - Zoning Aide)
0
Page 2
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 1987
C. Leahy found there were special circumstances p2rtaining to this
property in that it is unclassified land; there are no other
unclassified properties in the area so this would not be a grant of
special privilege. He then moved for approval of the sign exception
with the following conditions: (1) that the signs shall be installed as
shown on the plans submitted with the application form date stamped
June 25, 1987; (2) that the applicant shall obtain a building permit
before erecting the signs; and (3) that the signs shall have white
lettering on a Rockwood Red background and be made of wood with no
plastic parts, in order to match the historical style and colors of the
building and to satisfy the State Architect's office.
Second C. Ellis; motion approved on a 4-0-3 roll call vote, Cers Giomi,
H.Graham, S.Graham absent. Appeal procedures were advised.
ITEMS FOR STUDY
5. SPECIAL PERMITS FOR A DETACHED GARAGE - 2316 EASTON DRIVE
Requests: side setback requirements; clarify applicant's statement that
the purpose of the dormer windows is to allow for added storage space;
are dormers being added to tie in architecturally with the house. Item
set for public hearing July 27, 1987.
6. SPECIAL PERMIT - RETRACTABLE ANTENNA SUPPORT 'POWER FOR AMATEUR
RADIO STATION - 733 PLYMOUTH WAY
Requests: code requirements for this type of installation; picture of
tower and antenna after installation at another location; is lightning
protection required; does tower have red light on top; soils report,
will special foundation be required because of the soil; is it
electrically operated; diagram of antenna on top of the tower, diagram
showing placement of guy wires; how much of the time will tower be
raised to its ultimate height of 51'. Item set for public hearing July
27, 1987.
7. SIGN EXCEPTION - 1288 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY
Requests: clarify construction of pole sign, does it touch the roof of
the building; where will wall sign on the ground be put; is readerboard
electric. Item set for �ublic hearing July 27, 1987.
8. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT - SPORTS THERAPY CLINIC - 1545 BAYSHORE
HIGHWAY
Request: clarify requested hours of operation on weekdays. Item set
for public hearing July 27, 1987.
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 13, 1987
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was
called to order by Chairman Jacobs on Monday, July 13, 1987 at
7:34 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Ellis, Garcia, Jacobs, Leahy
Absent: Commissioners Giomi, H. Graham, S. Graham
Staff Present: Margaret Monroe, City Planner; Adriana Garefalos,
Planner; Jerome Coleman, City Attorney; Frank
Erbacher, City Engineer
MINUTES - The minutes of the June 22, 1987 meeting were unanimously
approved.
AGENDA - Order of the agenda approved. CP noted, according to the
rules of procedure of the Commission, a motion must receive
the vote of a majority (four) of the total Commissioners in
order to pass. Applicants have the option to request a
continuance to the meeting of July 27, 1987 since only four
Commission members are pr2sent this evening.
CONSENT ITEM
A. MINOR MODIFICATION TO ALLOW A THREE BEDROOM/TWO BATH SECOND STORY
ADDITION WITHOUT PROVIDING A SECOND CODE STAND�RD PARKING SPACE
ON SITE, PROPERTY AT 2213 DAVIS DRIVE, ZONED R-1
Reference public notice with attachments. Item was not called up for
public hearing by Commission. C. Leahy moved to send this minor
modification on to City Council for review. Second C. Garcia; approved
unanimously on voice vote, Cers Giomi, H.Graham, S.Graham absent.
ITEMS FOR ACTION
1. SIGN EXCEPTION TO ADD SIGNAGE TO THE BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
OFFICES AT 290 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED UNCLASSIFIED
Reference staff report, 7/13/87, with attachments. PLR Garefalos
reviewed details of the request, staff review, Planning staff comment,
applicant's comments, sign code requirements for a sign exception.
Three conditions were suggested for consideration at the public
hearing.
Chm. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Karen Key, Executive Director,
Burlingame Chamber of Commerce, was present. There were no audience
comments and the public hearing was closed.
Parnela L. Stearns
2316 EASTON �P,IVE •�URLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
� i�� /�"� / S �!
� ` � ' ,
� ����
r
, �-
�����Nnana �o �ii�
�U�. �. 519� i
:
����:��.��
0
�,,f r
( /..vs. ��� Y
� � /„7c
G� 1��-- ��� � '
. �
/. �u. G��c��g �u-c-t.� �
� G�� �- �� �
�'� �, � �. �,�.a,�.�.�,
c���
� �`"`.�`�..`„ ,,�.. �" °
� �� �� �� � �
�. �
�,�,,�..� . � '�-�- ��'�"�
� �. -�'�-
�
� �
� �
�
�.�..
. . . ... . ¢2 N 4.� :- �i'+J f �: 'Y�' -+' - �� 4�5 —.,�-- �}'L I � ._. ,_ . . . m { .
:.:;� . �
,�'. : .� ,... ,, _
I � � �\� I
N q/ � � 40 39 38 ` 3� OI �5 46 � I O
� 120' yp• ,. � .. .. � � q .
_ � �0 � 25- 25 � S4�
; �. -
� 55' o
� DE SOTO
�
COLUMBUS
.7
�„ �A
:!r I 36 35- i 34- j 33 ( 32 � �/ - 3p-� 29 -_
I �i� ;
� � -�
33 O 3/ 30 29 Zd 2� I 2b ,� O—
. .. . .. . _� . 3C'�.
.,�.
:96:
.. .
.. .. .. .. Sp - � I 2-SO'
' // /2 /3 /� i '/S i !6 � /7 ^ �
i � ja a isa81
o la o
�—Z�— � 23 �
/5 /6 /7 /B I /9 � 20 I so� �a�e
AVE.
N O 5 �— -- � i i I' _,1. � 9"I.GI3$ E.As,o ,a.
_'" � � 0 � � � 'U ;?;�� ; O' io O i2 /7
- � � I I � i i 'o Q. a o IdS-g
(v � O O O p
I f i-
i- si ¢ — I � i j ' ; l5 �/6A o�g v
6 % 8 I I %� � %� I �2 i �.� � �4 � Su 50' ?5.:6 E A�
w
;' jO 50' 25 25' So � EASE. � � EM "(39
��` � 3 � 153 50 .� - �
Q � So .. _ _ ��. � � P.4RCEL A. QPARCEL /5 � ��' . s�
93� PM.G�39 B 101.'13' hy0
`'' 30 29 28 27 6 �
25 �� ��
;20'�
�
� i1919 ,Z1 �' -
26 z� A?" -
ao.9a
`�
' ' a
_ �O . O
\o�� O .
� O 2 � 2 �J� I 2� i 23 � 22 174.'13 £.A.l �- �.: � 232
� a � � � ZO /7 �� � \ : �,.
� � � �Q ,��`� l6
_ I � ' I - � Sd4.21' � .
��G /� �.
7
� 28 � b 27 26 25 O 23 O 2/ ! 20 /9 '� 2� /B ��°0 )so'
80' �°
IZo' , , 5a .. : _ � ;,
. . . . i�T .. : .. . ^ .:555` 04' F - � . . - . .i0� . l3.G9�. .� � - . � -f -
' _ . • ... ,,, '
�, �- `
,. N CARLOS , AVE. �. . � '`�P tr •,�� O /3 a,.00� �s3ss= -
; Q,. ,
�- .. �. .. . . .. �. _ . �!` . . 18a' __ _ _. __ .. . ,�o� ... 573'3a W . �
;. � �. .. . � . .. . . - VSS�od'W . � ��� _
. � - � �, _ . - � . —
�
_ /9 , -� =
• �- ASSESSORS MAP COUNTY OF: S,�N ` MATEO . CAL/F. -
� �, , ,;p
'�� � f.�" �
. i
, >
v{'
. ` ,i,e' � � f �
y° 6 .
. �� Qs'Y 'q' �' � � . .
� . ^�/ �, � � F �.��. ( �,�� j h� ..
—��f �Y" ~ ��'\ r' i �(1 �' ♦� `�2'f#��
`� �� ' Y
.. 7 :,�, K � j.�'b �_ °�� . � ' .
t ��` � � � ��
Vv� �! K`4�u� 'r r ° ' �-a�f"� �., �„ .
�A� : `� � gr ?:.� •- • . e � � � 'g� ..
f t'
�' . .'� �'`pi , 'i �."v' � � � � ' .F � .5 ' �� .� .
1`�' f 3` k
�.�` � "�„4 = �:- �, �y4' �'�\ F i�,,�,� �'g �
ti d �
�m; � � ` � y ; � � ; .
� ,s� y, � ��:
.., ae \.�,, `: ;.. s�r• ��, . � - '� r' �� �` ,�d \. .i a �� r, :
d �?� . �' � � �r� �" '- �` � ;ts- i � � .
„ �� �€� � � ': � ��� � �,� �, �, �. � e��,� � � a�
�... � .
<� � ;r� ,v� � �` '� ` �� -f'�`,"�' j". i�
` _ x� �, =e �, t � - �'��`
� � .. � ��-y� 'i� �ta .. ��� �` � �- :..r�
u r' �� y ;� � � ` �� ; � � � � J�'�,,. �'� �.'M1 _ � _ - '� `` �„
,>
`�`� iZ i y�B "* � � '� �, E"` � � � �° �
�'�"t �� ,�+�.,s" "ti '� � x„'�� � �, r -
' � � �. �.: 5 � r �� ,T �,�- �g a� _ �'�. � „N r'��. y .' -
:� � � �� r ,� _ �fi ,'t
j �.
�r o `'
r zr . � � ��.., - x ' .,�
��� .,�.,, �2 t � �` , � �f t�� � �+� f { `�'3� . . �n � � >
� � - �'� �
��-�.:�r � � � i � ���` � �e ., �r`�. �� F ,,. f� "`5r �� . �� :� S�:
�i �:a .� „@, . :,�. � l�" M \ `ti '",4, �T�"`� �\ r ri° � r°� - x
^+� . ' � ` u :1-� : �,,,e= ;;
� .... �'�a ��" � ,: ,� �� •� s.� l�,���.. . � �:,. � �� . �Y �� ,
�ti
� �-?+ � � ��,°% s �` � ` � � � �vy� � � ''' ��L,r� �s �
r� v,, �� . ; �
-�, 5 '�a ��,� � � �,
�,
�
, � R� � �s � t :"-, � ,4�� � , {;._ �
�'� � � � a .� a 4Y ��,,: - . :
�. : f ` � � '� i � !{ �'" r ,� � _
. fr �E� �. a r_ s ' ;�� � .r
r � ?�- w,��� . �L :': �' A � r `� ` „a . � t -
x � ;, � � ��°' .�, ti
�, � � � ` ;� � � � � �,� �
� � F �'� r � � '!� f .� �h �, , "-
X � � , � � `Y �; � � .� � . �� � 4 S1�# C� ':� :.�
� . �i!'Y �� �` . 3�" _ � "� � ': 3� f • �.�p � ;
�
�� � � � � �� � fs '' % ,s�/��h � �`� }:; / -
:'� ��.. _'.� _ ��� , ,r -v
F � � � � ,� � � .
f � �'. �� � �� .' �` �
� r'
� ` p � � - �o �,,�f �� �,� � � F �-� f �
x� ��. ) d.. � f . � +1 !° 2 �
w..
>
- s a s. �f�. ,`� _
, �- 4 � �' �r _ � r:
r A7 ''�� : s' � �� � � b.o
�� F� �ti f 8 f�, t,c
�
.
�
L �"� � _� r :., 4s . �`�R °j ��.t, ; � a�
` ` �x ` �J:��,'� � �
�'� �/ `�.< '� � "4 `F � � +' �i" �
� �
� � M� � . , = ' ti ,'r � �' � C 4 � �. '-
��, -�l ; ''' ��✓''� �lC� �v' _� ` �
,� � �`�.,;,. � `�,,w"z'v� :� .r��"� "' � ' �.. � -
_ /�� � w� 5,t ��i' ' ., A �
.�;� �, . "..�- � � . � ;" ' e� �: t y� � ." .�' �r
y, "' t � � -' w�,: .-
�"��`^- ��� � � .'�� :�� �� �� \ �� /�j �r �' � ��� �' _
,f-• �:, � � � � � �' a , 3x� ,� � . +�`�+l'f _ � ,� ,� _
� ���'L � ��� ��,� � � � = € � "�� .�. .
.. P t �� � �` �.
,r`x . ��,�9 � ��� y.'�r � . �;' %�V+� � -
a�. � ti -
� � .w �� '�„ � �� �, -. ti T
.3'�� : .. . ; � s �r .v � � {� � i ,.
,� r .� j ;, {Q . � . . `3 �rf '�` :� R ��� f
�� .. . j � � �:
f %3 ��'^� � Y a � Y
i ,. 1' � . . . � . � �
�'� ' �' 3 ., ��� . . . � . �t
�
.� _ � ! f .. . . . ,�� t_
� �_ ���� � � �o-�..
,�, ��� ��v � z
,� �`,,��" �� `•, z3°
� x v
r � ,+, -- , d _ }- 236fc �� ��� s� ✓��
"'"s��~J a �' �
�'�w.� � , ��"' Se,� 2515 ���
a.,r � r .,. � � � � 2 �
� =�, ,,ti q �;,;�� � � �
s" � b . '
d ��,� ,�a� p� �,. � � , .
� w
� „� �r�� �� „� s
�� ,., �. . � ��� �,�
t� �- � �°,. _° F
� _ � � � ,
��� C�ii� II� ���������
SAN MATEO COUNTY
CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-8931
NOTICE OF HEARING
3 SPECIAL PERMITS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Monday, the Z�th of Julv 1987 , at
the hour of 7:30 P.M., in the City Hall council Chambers , 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame will conduct
a public hearing on the application to construct a detached garage with 1) windows
within 10' of the property line, 2) windows more than 10' above grade, and 3) storage
area in excess of permitted amount at 2316 Easton Drive, zoned R- 1.
At the time of the hearing all persons interested will be heard.
For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department.
MARGARET MONROE
CITY PLANPIER
July 17, 1987
0
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL PERMITS
RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame
that:
WHEREAS, application has been made for a special permit for
a 441 SF detached araqe
at 2316 Easton Dri�ce �APN 027-T53-180 �
and
WHEREAS, this Commission held a public hearing on said
application on �U�.y 27 , 198Z
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this
Planning Commission that said special permit is approved, subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution
be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo.
NANNETTE M. GIOMI
CHAIRMAN
I, HARRY S. GRAHAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission
of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 27tf1 day of �L1� y , 198% , by
the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS
NOES: COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS
HARRY S. GRAHAM
SECRETARY
P.C. 7/27/87
Item #3
R���iV��
�3U� 2 719�� c��r�
v�vrcArro�r ��c�r���a
CITY OF BURLiNGAtAE
FL".vNtNGpEPT. JUlY 27, 1987
AF?ER PREPqRATION
Th� Planning Cornlnission of the City oi Burlingame ��� - QF'���FR�Pp�T
Cit� Hall '
Burlingame, California 9�010
Re: Addition of two-story walk-in bar and bath at 23�6 Easton
Drive - and its negative eifect on a�emi-invalidcd
�.goraphobie resicling at 23iz r'aston Drive.
The �dgar R, Sears family of 2312 Easton Drive, has a special
situations concern regarding the addi-tion of a two-story walk-
in bar and bath at 231.6 Easton Drive. (Shown on blueprint oi con•-
struction of detached �;aragz at same acidress.}
Our complaints are a.s follows: The two�story structure of walk-in
bar and bath will be in very close proximity to our master bedroom.
A study of the blueprints has revealed that this strueture will
project far enough out to block the view from the window of our
master bedroom.
The sole occupant oi the master bedroom, Ruth A. Sears, is a semi-
invalided agoraphobie confined primarily to the master bedroom. The
two-story structure would ruin the aesthetic quality of Mrs. Sears'
room which is erucial to her general feeling of well being. The
obstruction of the present view, against a claustrophic wall oi
gray stucco, would be intolerable.
A side window in a second bedroom would be totall.y blocked by
the two story strueture of walk�in bar and bath. During the past
thirty years, IUIr. Sears, who occupies this room, has witnessed
drunks and t�e�passers from that particular window, informing the
B�zrlingame Police Department of their suspicious aetivities.Block-
ing his window would be detrimental to our Easton Drive Neighborhood
i�atch Program.
We also ieel the two-story structure at z316 Easton drive woulc�
ruin the symmetry oi the entyre block.
For -th.e above r=:asorzs vre propose that th� aadition oi walk-in bar
�,nd bath, wlzich has alreacly been rusY�ed through for approval, b;e
rescin.ded.
ERS:js
Respect�'ul -
� ' �
E. rAi�S, S .
��.c�=+:. � �.��n- -
RUTH R. SEA �
�.,
_ �-NE L . 5�13