HomeMy WebLinkAbout2304 Easton Drive - Staff ReportCtTY
�F ` � 1
'�';'e,
�•
•
-•
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
December 2, 2013
Planning Commission
Ruben Hurin, Senior Planner
Director's Report
Meeting Date: December 9, 2013
SUBJECT: FYI — REVIEW OF CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN
REVIEW PROJECT AT 2315 EASTON DRIVE, ZONED R-1.
Summary: An application for Design Review and Special Permits for an attached garage and
basement for a new, two-story single family dwelling and attached garage at 2315 Easton Drive,
zoned R-1, was approved by the Planning Commission on May 13, 2013 (see attached May 13,
2013 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes). A building permit was issued in October, 2013
and construction is underway.
The applicant is proposing changes to the exterior elements throughout the house. Please refer
to the attached letter, dated December 2, 2013, for an explanation of the proposed changes.
The architect submitted the originally approved and proposed plans, date stamped December 2,
2013, to show the changes to the previously approved design review project (changes are
clouded in red). Other than the changes detailed in the applicanYs letter and revised plans,
there are no other changes proposed to the design of the house.
Planning staff would note that because of the minor revisions to the exterior elements of the
house, it was determined that the project could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item.
If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action
calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant.
Ruben Hurin
Senior Planner
c. Randy Grange, TRG Architects, applicant and architect
ATTACHMENTS:
Explanation letter from applicant, dated December 2, 2013
May 13, 2013 Planning Commission Minutes
Originally approved and proposed plans, date stamped December 2, 2013
' Architects
Decembei 2 , 2013
Planning Commission
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010
� � � � � t. Ev- �_-
:,`'u � �
Re: 2315 Easton Drive
Dear Commissioner,
DEC - � i0i3
ClTY 0� SURLINGF�iv�E
c��-����N�ra� o��✓.
The new home that was approved for 2315 Easton is currently under construction. Upon our
regular meetings with the owner, we have decided to implement a few changes to the exterior of
the house that would require an FYI.
• Replaced the horizontal siding finish at the pediments of both the porch and the master
balcony with stucco and half-timbering.
• Added side trim for all the windows.
• Replaced mullions with leaded glass for the bay window and master bath window.
• Added high awning windows for the kitchen to bring in more natural light.
• Removed arch over front door and added transom window.
• Changed the rear roof porch from a hip to a gable and reconf'igured the shape of the
outdoor chimney. Changing the roof gives the rear patio a nice clean vaulted ceiling.
Overall, we consider these revisions to be an upgrade that contributes to the appearance and
character of the house. We hope you will find these changes acceptable.
Si cerely,
Randy Grange AIA LEED AP
205 Park Road, Suite 203, Burlingame, CA 94010 • vc: 650.579.5762 • fx: 650.579.0115 • admin@trgarch.com
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes May 13, 2013
6. 2315 EASTON DRIVE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMITS
FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE (RANDY GRANGE,
TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; PHILIP KAHN TR AND MARILYN ELPERIN TR,
PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report dated May 13, 2013, with attachments. Planning Manager Gardiner presented the
report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifteen (15) conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chair Sargent opened the public hearing.
Randy Grange represented the applicant.
■ Changed the plans a bit, changed the vent on front and entry porch.
■ Reconfigured chimneys and fireplaces to open up the back area. A big chunk of square footage is
in covered porch area, about 650 square feet.
■ On the landscape plan the replacement tree out front on plan should be a 48" box.
■ Will be submitting an FYI in the future to change the steam shower window in the Master Bathroom.
Commission comments:
■ Is there a fireplace in the Living Room? Where is the chimney? Is it a direct vent? Design calls for
a stone chimney, would be a nice architectural feature. (Grange: A chimney would only show a little
bit, would come through the upstairs bathroom and dormer. Would make sense if the fireplace was
at the side of the house.)
■ Most windows have trim, except on second floor egress window. Could use trim.
Public comments:
■ None
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Davis moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped
May 1, 2013 sheets A0.0 through A3.3, PW.1, L1.0, L1.5, L1.6, L2.0, L2.5 and Topographic Survey
Plan, with the amendment that the replacement tree at the front of the property listed as 36" box
shall be 48" box size.
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height
or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning
Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl;
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit;
4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's March 7 and April 10, 2013 memos, the City
Engineer's April 1, 2013 memo, the Fire Marshal's March 4, 2013 memo, the City Arborist's March
11 and April 12, 2013 memos, and the Stormwater Coordinator's April 18 and March 5, 2013 memos
shall be met;
12
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes May 13, 2013
5. that the property owner shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining all tree protection
measures as defined in the arborist report prepared by Ralph Osterling Consultants, Inc., dated
October 9, 2012;
6. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed
upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director;
7. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site
shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to
comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
8. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction
plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the
Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved
plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approvai is required;
the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning
Commission, or City Council on appeal;
9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting
details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;
10. that the project shall complywith the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which
requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction
plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial orfull demolition of a structure, interiororexterior,
shall require a demolition permit;
11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,
2010 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS
PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
12. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection, a licensed surveyor shall locate the property
corners, set the building footprint and certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) based on
the elevation at the top of the form boards per the approved plans; this survey shall be accepted by
the City Engineer;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the
architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as
window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification
documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division
before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the
roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
13
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes May 13, 2013
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones.
Discussion of motion:
■ Rdd condition that the replacement tree be 48" box instead of 36" as shown on plans.
Chair Sargent called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 7-0-0-0. Appeal
procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:50 p.m.
14