The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About110 Clarendon Road - Staff ReportItem # � Regular Action City of Burlingame Design Review Amendment Address: 110 Clarendon Road Meeting Date: OS/29/07 Request: Amendment to Design Review for as-built changes to previously approved new, two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage. Applicant and Property Owner: Tina Chen APN: 029-274-160 Designer: JD & Associates Lot Area: 7,900 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303, Class 3—(a) construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence ar a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-familyresidences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. History: On June 26, 2006, the Planning Commission approved by regular action an application for Design Review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage at 110 Clarendon Road, zoned R-1 (June 26, 2006, Planning Commission Minutes). On both August 14, 2006, and August 28, 2006, the Planning Commission reviewed a revised landscape plan and new garage door, for the proj ect at 110 Clarendon Road, as an FYI item. On October 23, 2006, the Planning Commission reviewed changes in window sizes and the removal of one window, for the proj ect at 110, Clarendon Road, as an FYI item. The Planning Commission accepted the revised landscape plan, a revised garage plan and all window changes submitted as FYI item for both the August 28, 2006, and October 23, 2006 Planning Commission meetings. A building permit was issued on September 15, 2006, and the project is nearing completion. This proj ect was brought to the Planning Commission on March 26, 2007 as an FYI item for several proposed as- built design detail changes. The Planning Commission noted specific changes that they wanted to discuss and requested that the item be brought back on the Regular Action Calendar at the next Planning Commission meeting where there was space on the agenda. Request: The applicant is now requesting an amendment for as-built design detail changes to the originally approved Design Review proj ect far a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage (CS 25.70.010). Those changes include: Front Elevation • Second floor balcony has a straight top rail (approved with curved rail). � Trim board over second floor double French doars has a slight curve (approved straight board). � Change in balustrade ornamentation at second floor. Rear Elevation � Top railing of second floor balcony changed from curved to flat tile (see rear elevation). • Trim board over a first floor window has a slight curve (approved straight board). • Stucco wall outlining lower level deck was changed to wrought iron. Left Elevation • Top railing of second floor balcony changed from curved to flat tile (see rear elevation). • Circular window with wrought iron detailing was removed. Desig�z Review I10 Clarendoia Roacl Ri�ht Elevation • Stucco wall outlining lower level deck was changed to wrought iron (see rear elevation). Detached Garage • Fenestration on the garage door has changed. • Original double door has been changed to a single wood door. Summary (includes as-built changes, plans date stamped May 17, 2007) : The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing 1,685 SF (.21 FAR) single-story house to build a new two-story single family dwelling and detached two-car garage. The proposed house and detached garage will have a total floor area of 3,838 SF (0.49 FAR) where 4,028 SF (0.51 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed floor area is 190 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. The project includes a new 504 SF detached garage (21'-0° x 24'-0") which will provide two covered parking spaces for the proposed four-bedroom house, where only one covered space is required. One uncovered space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other zoning code requirements have been met. Table 1 —110 Clarendon Road Lot Area: 7,900 SF EXISTING ' APPROVED PROJECT �,LOWED/REQ'D (04/29/06) SETBACKS ; Front (Ist flr): � 15'-0" 21'-4" 21'-4" (block average) (2nd flr): � none 26'-10" ' 21'-4" (block average) Side (left): 3'-8" 4'-2" 4'-0" (riglat): ; 19'-10" 8'-0° (to trellis) 4'-0" Rear (Ist flr): ; 97'-0" (to house) � 67'-5" 15'-0" (2nd flr): ; none 67'-5" 20'-0" Lot Coverage: ; 1,685 SF 2,679 SF 3,160 SF 21% 34% 40% ......._.._..._ ......................................._............................_......_.__.._.......:_......._.__...------- -----._.._.._...._...__......._.._............._......._..........................._............._...........__.._.........._....._....-- ------- ------------------- -----------------.._..._.__._._._...---- -----...._..---.....____ FAR: � 1,685 SF 3,838 SF 4,028 SF 0.21 FAR 0.49 FAR 0.51 FARI _ ...............................................................___----..._.._.__........._..._....__.........__._........._..........................__......._..___......._...._....._...........__._...._...._._...........__....._....___._...------------------...------------ _--------------..._._.__......-----.._..----....___---- # o bedrooms: ; n/a ; 4 ; --- __......f .................................._........................:._...............---..._._..............._.._........._..._._...._._........_..:...._..__.._..__...-----------.._..._._....._._..._....._..__.........----..._...._.._..._........__:............---.............__...................._.......__...._..........._..........................._..............................._................._... Parking: ; 1 covered 2 covered 1 covered lio� X Zo') (Zo� X 23�� ` �io� X Zo�) 1 uncovered 1 uncovered 1 uncovered � ; .... ......_ ._._._.----.�__._.. -----�9_'._X_2_o�)_ - -------- - - -------. _.__._ _.(9� X 20�)--«_. _----...._.._..._:..__._ ..---- _..----....._.__(9� X Zo�)---- __ ..__....__..._. _.._ _ .. __. _. : ; _.._............_ ..................................._........Heiglat.---.;.._..----....._..___.n/a 25'-10" 30'-0�� _......._. .................._.._..,.................................__........_...-------p ---...___.._._....----.........__..:............... __...._............_.._.... , __...._.......---.......---......---------........_..._...,__.....__..._... DHEnvelo e: n/a com lies CS 25.28.075 1(0.32 x 7,900 SF) + 1,100 SF + 400 SF = 4,028 SF (0.51 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached. 2 Design Review 110 Clarendon Road Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on Apri120, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be by resolution and include findings made for amendment to design review, and the reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built czs shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped May 17, 2007, revised site plan, revised building elevations and revised garage plan; date stamped August 16, 2006, landscape plan; date stamped June 13, 2006, floor plans, roof plan and floor area calculations; ancl date stamped April 25, 2006, Boundary and Topogrc�phic Survey; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shnll require and amendment to this permit; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's March 31, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's, Fire Marshal's and NPDES Coordinator's Apri13, 2006 memos and the Recycling Specialist's Apri15, 2006 memo shall be met; 3. that demolition or reinoval of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subj ect to design review; 5. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 6. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the proj ect has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; all windows shall be simulated true divided light windows with three dimensional wood mullions and shall contain a stucco-mould trim; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be 3 Design Review included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 110 Clarendon Road 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 10. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 11. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identiiied in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 12. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; 13. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration proj ects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 14. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 15. that the proj ect shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. Erica Strohmeier Zoning Technician c. Tina Chen, Property Owner and JD & Associates, Designer. � To_ City of Burlingame May 8`�, 2067 Planning Commision Re: Cheng Residence 110 Clarendon Rd. Bttrlingame, CA 44010 Dear Cammissioners: This Petter addresses some upgrades and issues that were brought up by #he c�mmissioners fram atneet�ng in March 2�07. After much reseazch, we vvould like ta upgrade our driveway from stamped concrete to pavers. Issue #1 Garage Daor We understand the approveri pta�is specified we would install two garage doors. We consulted with aur arclxitect abaut wheth�er we could ins#all one garage daor ta elirninate the risk of a car hitting a post while reversing into the garage of over 150 feet. Our architect informed us we wauld have no problem changing this featiu-e "as long as �he garage doar 1'ilces like two doors." i h�as, we purchased and installed a$35a0.00 single w€►�d gai'dge door that laoks like twQ garage doors. The windows are sLightly smaller than the plans' garag� door. We would appreciate not having to change this feature and ine�xrring a loss af$35b[}.Ofl. Issue #2 5mall Band Araund Turret At this sta.te of canstructiQn, I wQu�d like to eliminate the band anound the tuaret due ta not enough space between the corbels and the small window (althoug� I have bought all the m�terials fas installatian). Issue #3 Ti1e Top R,a.il �.fter meeting with Matt Greening, president of Mid-Peninsula Roofing Inc., he did not suggest putting "roof tile" on the top rail of the second floor t�alcany. He said, "the roof tile wi[l look �ood from the outside, buE not goad from the inside loaking out." I tivould like to install a flat tile to the tap rail (so I have the choice to place rr�y coffee down on the flat top rail while enjoying the view fram the back balcony). Issue #4 VJrc�ught Iron Vs_ Stueco Wail � wouid like to keep the upgrade�i wrought iron design outlining the lower levet deck, instead of a stucco wall. The ewrought iron design further aepresents the Spaaish style. Also, there is more continuity with wrought iron coming down from hoth sides of the siaia-s. ��'`'� ' � ` Th for your time an�deration, � � � � ��s � � _-�-� ma Cheng �AY � � 2Q07 �� oF au�� 1Ga;��nE PLAiViViP��G t?EP7. �'d 880LZ9£9ltil �u!1 d£6�Z0 LO 8Q �eW Y U, � ��i��,� ��vx(i�,�ru��v�F_ �,�. , ..,,,a� k .. .�� s� �"€��+' � �. x s ��_..✓'^� 'Yd ym f �' tcr�k b4i4(F a �Z ✓ j � �" � x ! W y yr w�` ^oe s F�S fif �� , . .�. . � � �� k �� f � ..�. .a�` .a�'��.��,,.�r�� a��^�:;�9 � � 'a�, b% h x�. '� iF N fi F ��i'� � X !s �d�a,� � �� + "�»�� <YA .� 'y�� r,� �x_ ,� ��y`H��f �r fi �rr '�� a. �"' �r�'E��'"`a��„�� ' ��i x : �� sd..�' �ai �� x� �r "� ��'' � �' � �. � . �''�L � Y. . . . �..k�.. A ' +A` . f �r� ,' - �� ee'd a� %t 8...., # � .I � .�. t A": , : �J f ' ��s t � � � �� %!�� ,�� ,�n� �'"�;�� ' Rs ��`� 4 r'��F.� �r�. �J/�V e � � 1 r n �� . � � �Y " S.h h'�7,� 1 �s � ��' n , �4.. �, y� 1�� r ic a a� t ,�. , ' ti : , ,.. . ,. � '. � � .. . �� ' . i .v—. �"' ... �� —r:" o . �. � . : � � �� , '� �-�_ �� . �._, � �� . b °� � 13t��,�;fi�%'� ��E-� s�li2.�€€'r`�i V�� f'�,�kt��f:�,U'�'C.}i�'i��.� i�CJ(�}i:� ".�"1�T:�i ��'i'T} �{�t 1� ��1� C.i 1 i:i=,.�I�3 �,�4 ��1��"C' I il:?.��i� �� __ ._ __....... � .,��' �� i � �'' � � °��' ' �� , r � � `" ��;ar�`"i��4�"�� d�,�� : , � e �,�. "� ,,__ , , �,^ �, ;��`��4�� v�,�; � ,�z r` ��f 7}y,y;h�+ f��•�: � � € �' �.. ; , �� ,�.,,,,+ �g , J�`v; y i „ �? t =° Y. � � � �� '� � ��"��==.-.:: , �� a .g�`� � �� F } �� .�.��. �; � � ;` �� i � »-�...M.�; "'�`--�.�..,—_..,. �"'' �3� ` ;� �� t�� h c � � � � �y � �� "` � � �, � �� ' � ' �" � �'�k �� *�� . � � � ,_ g-....,....._,.�� i�i�#�`��x��,�,F�� ' � b�X`�'��'"�t�i��,5 �r y�W ��a h t 1 �t z' "� ._ � z 7 � T "Is ��vi� 4) ;�� ;^�,y��s, t� s p� fe t n;� C-� a y��v i .'� t . � .�+� � � �'-` ��s � � �k k��'?',� t "'��'.a � ��'�+-�r�'i �'��' "�r"'�`�� :�. � ` � s,��-' �� ` � � �;�"� g `��, �� -�,�.�r �� s� `�dk� ��`�9��'� ��rr� <�� +E� ��,`? ,�*° ':� ��,.: � �;�se ��1 °� �� ;,��ri � �s^a' �$ ,} � �g5 ,� d#r`� �`t �5J . Yt' S��y� � ��2�° ��2£��.�p� !.. t *s;i �' n'�i � =. � '�'�� '� � y w�,",�. * q �'�`o � � r,.�' '� �r , 9a."'�� . .. _ �� Ci �� « � �t ��.� � � �, a� � � ��ti �` ,n �'r � �� {,bi F ��,�� 1 4 s -�^s o-+ i i Z� r <V I' � a� ?'" k� a�, �:,� y� a�� ;�' � g� x �r' y ° � Sty � � ' �`W�'��C'��rc�7'�""'��#� t' t�s� ■� � � .. ¢ 63 a ,a, 'S�`a ^r�.,� �a � 1 �� `� '"^�, �� . . � �� : p3 u y�'' t�' �� 1 i �.' M' � � 4G ��-}'��`�'�K S' �r ' ��, � �. d ,1� �.6p'� d A*'� � - � `,'�� ' � t d �� ' � �?'�.; sun�� . � � ��. � � � '� '' �f��'"��.:� At's�'?^.' �. i � � � �� `� r Ne 1 �,_ � � Ke��r�'�. '� � � �" � B , �, 9 , y �" " �� ,�+�„„"�.� t �i� t�� . , , � � r � � , , , i i ' ' " ' r � .. "� � . � � � � � � �� 1 �R1?� � � 4 Y 4 . < � e�.�tF� _� �� =,i. b g �s� � ,�+6„k �h ra . �. �-� Mx � � � s � �� „ � � _�- � �� '' � � �a � � � � �� ti z � � � s .� � � � � � �� 4� � � � ��F:f � ; 3 �` � . � � � '� � � � '� � �� j$; ` }((j �� " � h � � � '� � . � i ��{ f �� tl�i :aa � S '4� �� _ � �'�. � P �.t �` �"€ �'� . y;� z�"" �' ! .. � y , � �'� � A� ��... � a � �� ;.,�= •�� .��s� �' � �� 's � �� ' "i �"�� x� ��, � � i � t �' y � 2 � � � � � `4 >� C� �� „'�' Y'� ' � �i�f -.�.�f ae � . �� , " � � � g i� �� ,; � �.< .� �� , �� ' � � � r. E ��K� �� ' � � _;; ' '; < �� b �q{ � ,. ..... ��j S . i , k . n P �k� .+: . � %'-. �� %s� -�.. � � < t�f�� `i�v ?� � ��"w.�� ,�,r� � � e �� .� � � �°�'��c:t:t:� �� '�� .:� � �? �� e� ��, ��Y��M�� s � ��,� ,. �� T�,� � �� , � , ��a � � �� ,�. �� .z.�� _�'.� e . ...� ._� �' �N�.�., .a �� a�. �_. ` a � �� , � �d �.. � ��',. $-,�� E �� "� t , _,e. , '` `�,` a $ v �e'�,e� '� "" �� t� � ��. � r'��: .. - � � �"� .r'`.. .. . . i'C-1V�V YYY1+3 3��L�a�tv �ii.iJdYt. f'"t�t�°a.dllt�iliti.i;A ��i.:d�..�% I f'S.k�'r.i..3 i..��}��`��'i �,.�.e�� ,i.�"�:� �.�1.�� :�;� voiicrcvv� uu;4� P'AX 1�5U3768448 JD&A9SOCI�TES I� DO1/002 � � - ' 1 �.��i..r�� 3[.IX�,�?I�J�'x UESi+(�� +& Cr�EERTNGr ' 1228 ,palama avenue bttrlingame, ca. 941��U �ax (�SQ) 3?5-$448 tele. (650) 343-6Q14 emai� ,jda�a je�xYcl�al,�om 3-7 2Q07 To; Cit� of Bu�°ling�z.na Br�ilding Departm�rzt �.e: �heag Residenee ]1� Clarendon �urli�ame, �A ��010 I p�t'sona�� performed a site visit in arder to det�tnnfrte i�r,#t� as built constr�ctiax� caniarrns t� the ar�3rit�tzu'�k drawings from �e a�'ice �f �A &,A,ssociates 11��IN DWELLICiG � Z k�a�e foand �he ext�riar a�rch�tecturat chara�te:risti�� ofth� zz�ain c�reilita� have been ;follQw�i with minor e�,eptions tk� do Aot affect tbe int�grity �f d�ia��g. 'Y'he follu�ing znRuor d�#£�rences are nated: Frunt Eleva�ian * The second floaz ba�cony has a straiqht tpp r�it ir�stead ofthe slight�� curveti tbp zeil as 4riginalt�r propos�d. • The t�im. bc�ard over tize second flaor double Fr�nch doQrs has a sli�t c�u-ve instead of b�ir�g sbx�.ight • Th�re is a siight variation in the baluatrade orna�rn�ntatioa at the secon� #�aox Rear Ei�rration ,�'I'he top rail a�t't.he s�canc� flaor balcor�� has beeri changetl fro� roofing tile ta a wiyotl-tpp. r�il - + The trirr: board a�r�r a first flopr wind�w �as a sli�ht �ciurve instead o#'being strai��it �'S`he short stucco w,al} autlaanang the deck hes� beer► Ghangec! to a wrau��ht irdn , rai�ing T.eft Elcva#ion �, • The top r�il t�f tIze second flaor k�alc�n� h�s been c.�ngerl &om r�oafin� til� ix� :: _, � woad top rail- a�so se� re� �l�vaiion _ i+.:':'`: i � � 2Q07 � . �. _��,�_.._� _,,.- ��:�,; ; ,, U�/lYJYUU7 0&:44 FAfi 164437b8448 JD&ASSOCIATE9 � A cirrular windc�w with w�'au�hx iron d�Zing h�s b�er� r�m4v�. I�ght El�v�fior� � T�� scrQll�c� �d�e al�ng the chimney �,rtfl a porkic�n pf �he sscond �loor w�l� �� l�en Qrni�e�. * Th� short stucco wail o�tlimiug tb�e �e�rk bas heea cha.��ed to a wr�t��t iron r�iiing�alsa s�e rear elevatiau A+�C'E��URY S�TR�T+CT[fR� ( U�#��red ga�ag$) I bave fuuntl th� �xte�xor a�chit�tuz�k cha�acksristics of th� maia dwe}l.ing have been ft�Iiowed with twv exc�pt�qns_ * Tbe f�ostrat�on. am th� �srage d�r has ahanged +'�he prcaposerl double dot�r has been changed to a sin�te waad door_ �+DN�'LU�IQ�T - � in mp opinian the d+e�.il. chang�s fr�r.ux the apprpved design ar� eith�r �asat�ue, not negatav� �r o;f �zo ma�c��r coz�s�uc�c�. '1`�ank yau, F�bi�u Banaldz ;tp � Asso�lates I� 002/002 --- "� f �J�4� � � � ��0� �>�� `'„I`,` , ' -J;. City of Burlingame Planning Departrnent 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(630) 696-3790 www.burlingame.orQ �� CIT7 0� �� APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �� Type of application: Design Review a� Conditional Use Permit Variance Special Permit Other Parcel Nuxnber: �� -�'Z`��-l�cp Project address• 1�� '"�-h��- �-�- �� R`�� APPLICANT Name: �I �� k-�� Address: �� 6�-� r'�� P�l� R i� City/State/Zip: ��1��-��-�vL�`E , � Phone (w):�`Z-`�� - �� )� �fl� ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: �+-�- .�i, ��S<' c'��i`�� ''7�` Address: C2--`z-U [`'��-��ii(�- /�'� PROPERTY OWNER Phone (w): (h): �fl �- Ciry/State/zip:�,�,r�� nti�-, �- �� Please indicate with an asterisk * Phone (w): �S�'�- 3�-�— ��" �' the contact person fo�r�h�is��r�oj V �h) � _ (fl : �' �'° �— `�-7 � — .� yL['� MAR 3 0 2006 CITY OF BURLINGAME pLANNiNG DEPT. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: t��J 5[+� �-� ��'�'�--7 `r'Uv � i--{-� � �-�' ��T�r-�=F--f--i�.� �*'�'r-�� AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: �- ?�� Date: �� `� � / � � I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: ` �y��''�- � '�` - Date: � `?.�-� � � Date submitted: PCAPP.FRM Project Comments Date: 03/31 /2006 To: af City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Subject: Request for Design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 110 Clarendon Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-274-160 Staff Review: 04/03/2006 1. See attached. 2. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V � Date: 4/03/2006 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING REVIEW COMM�NTS j�J -�� -S`� Project Name: �"-,v�f�� Q�/l,�u.,,�>t - Project Address:_I I.O .Cti/��J� ,, The following reguirements apply to the project I � A property boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners, easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 2 �_ The site and roof drainage shall be shown on plans and should be made to drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.) 3. T'he applicant sha11 submit project grading and drainage plans for approval prior to the issuance of a Building pernut. 4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project sha11 comply with the City's flood zone requirements. 5 � A sanitary sewer lateral 1Q�R is required far the project in accordance with the City's standards. ( .) 6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. 8 Submit tr�c trip generation analysis for the project. 9, Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traf£ic study should identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City Engineer. 10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering Division. The parcel map sha11 show a11 existing property lines, easements, monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map. Page 1 of 3 U:\private development�PLANNING REVIEW COMIvIENTS.doc = , ��I.IC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION k .__� A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the pazcel map for reviews. _,e ,,,.,� Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel map. a:: � The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions � in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 14 �� The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. 15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, paxking meters and poles; trees, and streetlights in accordance with sireetscape master plan. 16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and public on street parking. The project sha11 identify these impacts and provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. 17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil engineer for the proposed creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements. 1� rn� Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State Department of Fish and Game Pernut and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. 1 g No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek. 20 _.� The project sha11 comply with the City's NPDES permit requirement to prevent storm water pollution. 21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re- submit plans with driveway dimensions. Also clazify if the project is proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject to City Engineer's approval. �.� __r._,__ The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re-submit plans . showing the driveway profile with elevations Page 2 of 3 U:\pi:�%:,,;� �evelopment�PLANNING REVIEW COMI��NTS.doc �'��LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 2= -- -�-�— The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm water from the street into private property. �y=,. ._..,�..»�_� For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle sha11 be placed in front. The sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the property. ''�� For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area �,._. ___c�A� sha11 be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to the Sanitary Sewer System is required. Page 3 of 3 , ;��,�i.c ;�evelopment�FLANNING REVIEVJ COTRvIENTS.doc �_ .�. _ ._ � Project Carr��erat� t Date: l"o: From: Subject: Request for Design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 110 Ctarendon Road, zoned F2-1, APiV: 029-274�-'d 60 StafF R�vievv: 0�/03l2006 03/31(2Q06 � City Engineer X Chief Building Cfficiai � Recycling Specialist �1 Fire 14�arshal � City Arborist CI City Attorney Pfanning Staff C! NPDES Gaardinator 1) All construction must comply with the 2001 Califarnia Building Codes (CBC), the Burlingame Municipal and Zaning Codes, and all other State and Federal requirements. 2) Provide fu►ly dimensioned plans. 3) Comply with the new, 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential buildings. Go to nil�.%I1pJ`ivvv.er�erq�r.ca. ,�v/¢itlC24� for publicatians and details. 4) Roof eaves must not project within two feet of the property line. 5) Exterior bearing walls less than three feet from the property line must be constructed of ane-hour fire-rated construction and no openings are allowed. 6) Rooms that can be used for sieeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. 7) Pravide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered In calculating the allowable floor area. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings mare than 30" in height. 8) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are more than four risers. 9) �roviUe fi��iin� a� ail ext�ri�r ianciii�gs. 10)The fireplace chimney must terminate at least twa feet above any roof surface within ten feet. Revi � Da�e: ��f�c.� (� Project Comments Date To: From 03/31 /2006 ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney X Recycling Specialist ❑ Fire Marshal CJ NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 110 Clarendon Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-274-160 Staff Review: 04/03/2006 Applicant shall submit a Recycling and Waste Reduction Plan for approval, and pay a recycling deposit for this and all covered projects prior to construction or permitting. Reviewed by: .. � Date �f� �� / / Project Comments Date: To: From: 03/31 /2006 ❑ City Engineer ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ City Arborist ❑ City Attorney ❑ Recycling Specialist [�t Fire Marshal ❑ NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 110 Clarendon Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-274-160 Staff Review: 04/03/2006 Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide double backflow prevention. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to ir�stallation. Reviewed by: �- /��=��- Date: 3 �',e�s�� Project Comments Date To: From: 03/31 /2006 � City Engineer � Chief Building Official � City Arborist � City Attorney � Recycling Specialist � Fire Marshal Q NPDES Coordinator Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design review for a new, two-story single family dwelling and detached garage at 110 Clarendon Road, zoned R-1, APN: 029-274-160 Staff Review: 04/03/2006 1) Any construction project in the City, regardless of size, shall comply with the Cify NPDES permit requirement to prevent stormwater pollution including but not limited to ensuring that all contractors implement construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) and erosion and sediment control measures during ALL phases of the construction project (including demolition). Include appropriate stormwater BMPs as Project Notes. These BMPs include but are not limited to the following: • Store, handle, and dispose of construction materials and wastes properly to prevent contact and contamination of stormwater; • Control and prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants, including pavement cutting wastes, paints, concrete, petroleum products, chemicals, wash water or sediments, and non-stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses; • Use sediment controls or filtration to remove sediment when dewatering site and obtain all necessary permits; • Avoid cleaning, fueling, or maintaining vehicles on-site except in a designated area where wash water is contained and treated; • Protect adjacent properties and undisturbed areas from construction impacts using vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes, mulching, or other measures as appropriate; • Perform clearing and earth moving activities only during dry weather; • Limit and time application of pesticides and fertilizers to prevent polluted runoff; • Limit construction access routes and stabilize designated access points; • Avoid tracking dirt or other materials off-site; clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping method; • The Contractor shall train and provide instruction to all employees and subcontractors regarding the construction BMPs. 1 of 2 Project Comments — Con't- 110 Clarendon Rd.-NFSD, 2-story with detached garage 2) The public right of way/easement shall not be used as a construction staging and/or storage area and shall be free of construction debris at all times. 3) Implement Erosion and Sedimentation Controls (if necessary): a. Install and maintain all temporary erosion and sediment controls continuously until permanent erosion control have been estabiished; b. Address method(s) for diverting on-site runoff around exposed areas and diverting off-site runoff arount the site; c. Address methods for preventing erosion and trapping sediment on-site. 4) Provide notes, specifications, or attachments describing the following: a. Construction, operation and maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures, including inspection frequency; b. Methods and schedule for grading, excavation, filling, clearing of vegetation, and storage and disposal of excavated or cleared material. Brochures and literatures on stormwater pollution prevention and BMPs are available for your review at the Planning and Building departments. Distribute to all project proponents. For additional assistance, contact Eva J. at 650/342-3727. Reviewed by: -�} ,,)G�nMf�,�sir Date: 04/03/06 2 of 2 ' �' � � � � � � � ;i�'i%�.. • ' • ' � � �,P��=,�,,., � • • � '11111� � . � ��.� �t'�"r� Soii erosion costs Bay Area homeowners mitlions of dol- Iars a year. We Iose valuabte topsoil. We have to pay for damage to roads and property And our tax money has to be spent on cleaning out sediment from storm drains, channels, lakes and the.Bay. You can protect your prop- erty and prevent future headaches by fo(Iowing these guidelines: BEFORE AND � DURING CONSTRUCTION Plan construction activities during spring and summer, so that erosion control measures can be in place wfien the rain comes. • Examine your site carefully before building. Be aware of the slope, drainage patterns and soil iypes. Proper site design will help you avoid e.�cpensive stabilization work. Preserve existing vegeta- tion as much as possible. Limit grading and plant removal to tfie areas under current construc- tion. (Vegetation will naturalIy curb erosion, improve the appearance and the value of..your property, and reduce the cost of Iandscaping Iafer.) � Use fencing to protect plants from filf material and traff c_ If you have to pave near trees, do so witfi permeable as- phalf or porous paving blocks. � Preserve tfie natural contours of tfie land and disturb the earth as Iittle as possible. LimiYthe time in which graded areas are exposed. • Minimize tfie Iengtfi and steepness of slopes by benching; terracing, or - constructing diversion ' �=�� ,;�- structures. Landscape � benched areas to stabitize . the siope and improve its appearance_. As soon as possible after grading a site, plant vegetation on aII areas that are not to be paved or otherwise covered. Control dust on graded areas by sprinkling with water. restricting traffcc to certain routes, and paving or gravel- ing access roads and driveways. ?EMPORARY MEASURES TO STABILIZE THE SOIL Grass provides the cheapest and most ef- fective short-term ero- sion control. It grows quickly and covers the ground completely. To fnd tfie best seed mi�c- tures and plants for your area, check with your Iocal nursery, the U.S. Department of Ag- ric�Iture Soil Conserva- tion Service, or the University of California Cooperative Eactension. Mulches hold soil moisture and provide ground pro#ection from rain damage. 7hey aiso provide a favorable envi- ronment for starting and growing plants. Easy-to-obtain mutches aze grass clippings, Ieaves, sawdust, bazk cfiips and straw Straw mulcfi is nearly 100`%' eTfective when heId in place by spraying with an organic glue or wood Fber (tackifters), by punching it into the soil with a shove[ or roIIer, or by tack- ing a netting over it. Commerciai applications of wood fbers combined with various seeds and ferTilizers (fiydraulic mulching) are effec- - _ tive in stabilizing sloped areas. - -- Hydraulic mutching with a - tackifer should -= be done in two - - _ separate appli- � - , _ _ . .. - _ _ . cations: the first ' � composed of seed fertilizer and half fhe mulch, the second composed of tfie remaining mulch and tackifrer. Commer- ciai hydrautic mulcfi applicators—wfio also provide other eros4on controI services — are Iisted under "Iandscaping" in the phone book. .. �-s: { i �"��i ' ,="' -iai � �..:�.:."r ��' ii = y<�:;%ii�io�% . �`% �`' -«. K.,.. � �i%�-�'ia � ` - - � = " , �:�+w"m� Mats of excelsior, jute netting and.ptastic sfieets can be ef- fective temporary covers, but they must be in contact witfi the soil and fastened securely to work effectively. Roof draiaage can be colIected in barrels or storage con- tainers or routed into tawns, ptanter boxes and gardens. Be sure to cover stored water so you don't collect mos- quitos, too. Excessive runoff should be d'uected away from your house. Too mucfi water can damage trees and make foundations unstable. S?RUCTURAL RUNOFF CON?ROLS Even with proper timing and planting, you may need to protect disturbed areas from rainfall until the plants have time to establish themselves. Or you may need permanent ways to transport water across your property so that it doesri t cause erosion. To keep water from carrying soil from your site and dump- ing it into nearby Iots, streets, streams and channels, you need ways to reduce its volume and speed. Some exam- ptes of what you might use are: jute netting � � �i��rirfi��n.5 aJc.r:;� � ;. diversion d'ttcf perimeter d4ke � / straw mulch Riprap frock Iining) — to protect channel banks from erosive water fIow • Sediment trap—to stop runoff carrying sediment and trap the sediment �=: --� �? „ � P • Storm draia outlei protectioa—to reduce tfie speed of water flow- ing from a pipe onto open ground or into a natural channel Diversion di&¢ or perimeter dike—to divert excess water to places where it can be disposed of properly ��f�`� f �' ` y '.!� ':� ��'i � � � �-`��,�� — — - ��--��` i..._- - Straw bale dike—to stop and detain sediment from sma1l unprotected areas (a short-term measure) • Perimeterswale—todivert runoff from a disturbed area or to contain runoff within a disturbed azea `" T-an' �-�_sv� :�. �-^.'<�` - ��`�'��f'�`�jy''�%k; . . �%��--��=�'��'`i�h`�`��-�.'�.��. • Grade stabilizatioa struct�xre—to carry concentrated runoff down a siope sediment trap -•- o ��.�. -� -� . .� ��- outlet protectio� �4 Conservalree ..,� �. �, ,.� .�.,, _ � '� 1 •'r, l � Vegetatioa-stabilized I(�) t � Slope: Security � � (i { ( : �l • soil in place • minimam of �� erosion • fewer winter clean- �J (� j up prob[ems � • protection for /� • � house foun- � daflons / !�� / �� j� ��%��_ 0 Sare Slope: Headacfies ?` and Iiability ' ' • mudslide danger • Ioss of topsoil .•` * - f . • c[ogged storm `•1 �k•- '� :k:: yl.. .` drains. fIooding -:�'•�'•;y;, problems r+ � � : , • expensive ' ` deanup rr` �� • eroded or ' buried ho�se s�'� ' - foundations � �� " /ti, f - ��• I�' �� f'.i %. .: .. , :` ; ..., �- y `;' \ `tip� �:h` ` � \" ; 'r;..�r' 'f. ' ��.. . s .�f ' ._�•'t':��._-^: ; �. .. . ... i TIPS FOR THE HOMEOWNE� �Q�°` � , �,� `_ // "Wiaterize" your property by irud-September. Don't wait until spring to put in Iandscaping. You need winter protection. Fina1 Iandscaping can be done Iater. Inexpensive measures installed by fall wi1l give you protection quickly that wi11 Iast aII during the wet season: Ia oae afternooa you caa: • Dig trenches to drain surface runoff water away from problem areas such as steep, baze slopes. � Prepare bare areas on slopes for seeding by raking the surface to Ioosen and roughen soiI so it wi1l � hold seeds. Seediag of bare.slopes • Hand broadcast or use a"breast seeder." A typicat yard can be done in tess than an hour: • Give seeds a boost with fertilizer. • Mu1ch if you can, with grass clippings and Ieaves, bark c£ups or straw. • Use netting to hold soil and seeds on steep slopes. • Cfieck with your Iocal nursery for advice. v. ,,, . Wiater alert • Check before storms to see that drains and ditches arenot ctogged by teaves and rubble. • Check after maJor storms to be sure drains are ctear and vegetation is holding on slopes. Repair as necessary. • Spot seed any bare azeas. VV�iY SHOULD ViTE WORRY ABOU2 SOIL EYtOSION? ater and wind carry soil from our Bay Area Iand down into our reams; Iakes and the Bay. This soif carries with it poIlu- nts such as oil and grease, cfiemicaTs, fertilizers, animal asfes and bacteria, wfiich threaten our water quality. ich erosion also costs the home construction industry, Iocal >vernment, and the homeowner untold millions of dollars Ye� Nature slowly weazs away Iand, but human activities such as construction increase the rate of erosion 200, even`2,000 times that amount_ When we remove vegetation or other objects that hold soil in place, we expose it to the action of wind and water and inaease its chances of eroding. The Ioss of soil from a construction site results in Ioss of topsoil, minerals and nutrients, and it causes ugly cuts and gullies in the landscape. Surface ninoff and the materials it carries with it ctog our culverts, fIood ehannels and streams. Sometimes it destroys wildlife and damages recreational areas such as Iakes and re- servoirs. As an example; road and home building in the Oakland hills above Lake Temescal fr1led the Iake to such an extent tfiat it had to be dredged in 1979 at a public cost of $750,000. NEED MORE INFORMA7ION? 3AG has produced a slide/tape show on soil erosion �Iled "Money Down the Drain." It is available for showing any interested group. CaII ABAG Public Affairs at (415) �1-9730. 3AG has also pubtished a"Manual of Standards for Sur- ce Runoff Control Measures" which deals extensively ith desigris and practices for erosion prevention, sedi- ent confrol, and control of urban runoff. The manual addresses �problems and solutions as they apply to California and the Bay Area. It can be purchased from ABAG and is available on reference at many Iocal Iibraries and in city and county public works and planning depart- ments: USDA Soil Conservation Service personnel are willing to provide more information on specifc erosion problems. This brochure is a cooperative project of tlie Association of Bay Area Go�emments and the East Bay Regional Park Districf. o e� r� waon E� GOCANUENiS Hotel Claremont Berkeley, Celitornia 94705 (415) 841-9730 PR�rEC�ING EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT . 11500 Skyline Blvd. Oakland, CA 94619 531-9300 YOUR PROPER�Y �ROM EROSI'1N � . . . � - RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desi�n review amendment for as-built chan�es to a previously approved new, two-stor�gle family dwellin� and detached two-car garage at ll0 Clarendon Road, zoned R-1, Tina Cheng, property owner, APN: 029-274-160; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Mav 29, 2007, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the docuinents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303, Class 3—(a) construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including (a) one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences maybe constructed or converted under this exemption. 2. Said design review amendment is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such design review amendment are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certi£ied copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 29th day of May , 2007 by the following vote: S ecretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review amendment. 110 Clarendon Road Effective June 8, 2007 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stampecl May 17, 2007, revised site plan, revised building elevations and revised garage plan; dc�te stamped August 16, 2006, landscape plan; date stamped June 13, 2006, floor plans, roof plan and floor area calculations; ancl date stamped April 25, 2006, Boundary and Topographic Sui-vey; and that any changes to tlze footprint or floor area of the building shall require cznd amendment to this permit; 2. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's March 31, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's, Fire Marshal's and NPDES Coordinator's April 3, 2006 memos and the Recycling Specialist's Apri15, 2006 memo shall be inet; 3. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 5. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 6. that prior to final inspection, Planning Deparhnent staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; all windows shall be simulated true divided light windows with three dimensional wood mullions and shall contain a stucco-mould trim; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review amendment. 110 Clarendon Road Effective June 8, 2007 10. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 11. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 12. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and imgation plans at time of permit application; 13. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior ar exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 14. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 15. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNIPIG DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD 6� � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ! ' , TEL (650) 558-7250 � (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Sitea I10 �LA��N90N ROAD �� 1 �r� ; � '� ��:�� :��° � �,�� .�� „; �;.z y� -�� - � �� :;� ��s ��y. � '� � �'�'R"}s_-F• �; '.�'__' _ '. . _ ' The (ity o# Burling�me Planning Cammission announces the following publi� hearing �� TUESDAY, MAY 29, 2007 at 7:00 P.Mo in fhe (ity Hall Council Cham6ers, 501 Primrose Road, Eurlingame, CAa Application for amendment fo �n approved design review praject for a neW, two-story single family dwelling with detached garage a# � 19 �LAR�NDON ROAD zoned R-l. APN 029-274-150 Mailed: May 1 �, 2907 (Please refer to other side) 09eH16504325 � ��.�� 37aiied =rom y�$J�ii7 5JJ i�✓°3.9ftv\�.T� ��'� �i��'�� '�� C'l7'�' O�' ��II�L711TG�1ME A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed priar to the meeting at the Planning Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California: If you challenge'the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited�to raising only those issues you or someone else:raised at the public hearing, described in the notice'or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. - Property owners:. who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this' notice: For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. Margaret Monroe City Planner � Pl1�Ll� H��RING NOTIC� (Please refer to other side)