The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2616 Summit Drive - Staff ReportTO: DATE t, CITV �a O� BURLJNGAME �� ;�� STAFF REPORT �b.� HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL suE BY N0�7EMBER 14, 1989 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS AP 8Y �"' — AGEND♦ g E ITEN e TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, PORTION SUBJECT: OF LOT 22 OF KENMAR TERRACE — 2614 SUMMIT DRIVE AND 2616 SUMMIT DRIVE — PM 89-9 Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve this as both a Tentative and a Final Parcel Map, and staff will see that the final documents are recorded. Background: This lot line adjustment is necessitated because it was found that a structure had been placed over the property line. Because no additional lots are created, it is a lot line adjustment and Section 66412(d) of the Subdivision Map Act states that a: "local agency shall not impose conditions or exactions on its approval of a lot line adjustment except to conform to local zoning and building ordinances, or except to facilitate the relocation of existing utilities, infrastructure, or easements. No tentative map, parcel map, or final map shall be required as a condition to the approval of a lot line adjustment. The lot line adjustment shall be reflected in a deed or record of survey which shall be recorded." The property owners and engineer have agreed to do a parcel map in lieu of the Record of Survey, which is the reason for this Map and Staff Report. No objections have been raised from Planning, Building, Fire or Engineer- ing Divisions; and this Map is being placed before Council directly since no public hearing is required. Exhibit: Map; City Planner Memo ��Gf�'��%��%'� / / Frank C. Erbacher PVT: djm cc: City Clerk/City Attorney Kavanagh Engineering, 708 Carolan, Burlingame, CA 94010 Charles Mahnken, 2614 Summit Dr., Burlingame, CA 94010 John Moran, 2616 Summit Dr., Burlingame, CA 94010 MTG. ��/�O/pn DATE 07 November 7, 1989 MEMO T0: CITY ENGINEER FROM: CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: REVIEW OF TENTATIVE AND FINAL MAP FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AT 2614 SUMMIT DRIVE Planning staff have reviewed this map application and find it consistent with the plans submitted for the special permit granted for the structure on December 7, 1982. It is our understanding that independent of the mapping action some modifications need to be made within the structure to achieve complete conformity with the plans approved. The City Attorney is working with the applicant to complete these requirements to the city�s satisfaction. ��~� n�—. Marg ret Monroe City Planner MM/s ;/ '�L. 3 i. r . . .. . ... ... x-,if: 1 . �,F � 1 �O � 9� �`�'p� , F. a� �' '1:. ? �f�'H �� .Q�. I N �G• �OJ� � NF'� 0 6�' p�, �c. �� JJ6.i3 / � Q� 55 �� . � , ��• �oj°� . � �; ' ,�� o� � o �,, - > .4 �' ��'�°' . -v�O o\o\'�� ^� p�-J�\. o � . �c�� . t 0� 0 ` . . " ro �G•�<c. o,�C�.. ' S� /. 0 „ \,�O `�JO�. �7 ` Z;'.� aP� . h�yP Q�O � � ti ��e�� ti� . . �' . . ' GoR 2 p� � � � o0 oe �,. o, . g P��, I . 353.61 , G�� . ' . �i �'h �0 O� �,�G LJ ^� • � 0 ' �C �'ti ij� �� L5 � U;�II�� O\ 6 ��' I �'h : � � NO;� I 3 I� ;�! J63.80 DEPT.OF PUBLIC IS�;:,. _\ � CITY OF BURLIF;;Af;;;, �P,\ � �O �6 0� � 26 ��. �n�; ^,� S = (;`i �c� ` -�� ; g L. kA ��// L � "No.C20858� x DETAIL � .A Exp.9-30-93 * NEW PROP. LINE �y�F �F�C L1Fp0.�\�. �" = 2� . �; � . ,� � AREA SUMMARY EXISTING LOTS LOT 22A i3,069 SF ' 0.300 AC PTN ' LOT 22 14,694 SF � 0.337 AC PROPOSED LOTS LOT 22AA 12,e72 SF 0.295 AC LOT 22B 14,891 SF ' 0.342 AC � � R � �c�. �� p�. :/ P�' p0 /. t<` 0 vi� �14 � � ^ a-. OF'C� P \ 9 \� �/� /�' � 9,� ` \ c: j;�' � ' c^ i v � . �ro �O,' 0 \ �'6, ��' i i' ----- ._._ �L. .._ _ . _ _O _. .. � .... .. . �Q'�e`� P � � ��' .-.—�oJS�. . '�e h`� ,P �` � � '° s9� `�� S tx d' �' . ; � �Q. � i �\ m. \ -�\\ / , 26� S 46' 59' 33' E� 2 � / � `� 24.08' � � \ `� // y� , ✓ �/�i1�. S 40'4000�. E �/,�� `i�// �/i�^" \6 Z�'LZ /,i � O� �\ /�! / 2 \ � ; S 33' 42' I6' E 7/ � `� O/ \/ �, � 22.66' C\ ` `� i�` ' N 2 p$A�\� Q� � 4U•2B?00 �^ E ` 6 S�C�� ,P,r� �� 2 ti` �� .� ��. �i i ��°00�0 —�� r� NEW �OT LI� : � BEARING O N 53' S1' 01 " F e�R O S 35' 36' 57' ' �//l/C O S 35' 47' q2' L�� - BEING A NESVBDIVISION OF PARCEL 22-A AS SHOWN ON THAT � �PAPCEL WP FILED OCTOBER 10� 1964 W BOOH 53 OF PARCEL � O�l /� 4AP5 AT PAGE 2B� AI-0 PORTION OF LOT 22 AS SHOWN ON � , r / // / 'NEN4AR TERRACE' FLED FEBftUARY 27� 19DJ IN BOOK 36 Of I ��>' �' MAPS AT PAGES 21 ANO 2�� SnN NATEO COUNTY RECORDS. � ---- -------- �--- CHARLES L KAVANAGH KAVANAGH ENGINEERING APPR� G LK . 708 CAROIAN AVe. BURIINGAME� CA 94010 14151 579�L� �� RCE 20858 BY� LEP� SMZ 1AAHNKEN RESIDENCE i BURI_1(. ExP 9-30-93 aoe. as3z �AGRANUESIDE�CE ��TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP RR AAAHNKFN 2Fi16 SIIIAMIT �R. , � I � ' � 4 ' ' � � CUR�' P�� ' . qp� Q� O F. �� \�� J o� �� — N — �' � � �, � P��\ ��h � \ �O �\ �� ; l O !�' � ,O` ; ,�� ,� �ti �� '. P� � A��Lh �^J �• � � n1 � � �. �� y5 �I. � ��,o i1,P `� � y � 0.. �, R � 175 13 5O 325 I: �, �? s � 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10, 11, 12, � ,�S �� / � 13. > CLAIyS: (1) ARTHUR CARBON; (2) CHRISTIANNE HERRMANN; (3) VALENCIA .TARRETT City Attorney recommended denial of these claims. RESOLUTION 29-84 - AUTHORIZING AGREEt�IENT FOR ENGINGERING CONSULTANT FOR BAYSHORE RECONSTRUCTION JOB 013 Associate Engineer's memorandum of April 25, 1984 recommended adoption of this resolution for contract with i•fark Thomas & Company for engineering services in amount not to exceed $58,600. REAPPOINTMENT OF PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEht ADVISORY BOARD MEMBEP. Letter from Library Board President Parsons requested reappointment of Leo Kriloff to this Advisory Board for another two year term. _ � RESOLUTION 30-84 - AWARDING CONTRACT FOR REPAIR OF EAST �IILLSDALE STORh1 DRAIN - JOB 031 City Engineer's memorandum of �fay 2, 1984 recommended approval of this contract to Smith and Denison, Incorporated in the amount of $74,998. TENTATIVE CONDO MAP - 1508 FLOPIBUNDA City Engineer's memo of hiay 1, 1984 recommended council concur with Planning Commission and approve this map for 12 units. TENTATIVE CONDO MAP - 1233 BELLEVUE City Engineer's memo of May l, 1984 recommended council concur with Planning Commission and approve this map for nine units. TENTATIVE CONDO MAP - 1119 CHULA VISTA City Engineer's memo of May l, 1984 recommended council concur with Planning Commission and approve this map for three units. FZYAL PARCEL MAP - 1470 BAYSHORE City Engineer's memo of �1ay 1, 1984 recomnended council concur with Planning Commission and approve this combination of parcels with one condition listed. TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP - 2616-2620 SU�I�IIT DRIVE City Engineer's memo of May l, 1984 recommended council concur with Planning Commission and approve map. SPECIAL EYCROACHMENT PERMIT - ADELINE MARKET City Engineer's nemo of May 3, 1984 recommended council approve this encroachnent permit with conditions to pave and use alley area adjacent to the Adeline Market at 1500-1508 Adeline Drive. Councilman Mangini moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Seconded � by Councilwoman Barton, carried unanimously by voice vote of inembers present. OLD B[1SINESS - SAVE OUR STATIOY AUCTION Mayor Amstrup reminded council that the fund raising auction would be held at the Kohl iNansion on July 19. He said the funds have reached the halfway mark. ACKNOWLEDGitENTS l. Commission I°tinutes: Plannino, elpril 23, 1984; Library Board, April 17; Civil Service, ^farch 13, 1984. 2. Proclanation: Chi1d Passenger Safety [Jeel<, �lay 11-18, 1984. 3. Proclamation: Older rlmericans }lonth - ifay 1984. 5 *-�"r � t + � CITY �� O� � BURLINGAME ��.,�� TO DATE: STAFF REP�RT Honorable Playor & City Council 1, 1984 � � AGENDA g L ITEM # MTG. 5/7/8[� DATE SUBMITTED �LL i�/ ��.`t�-� B Y yGk / APPROVEC BY ro�e__rty lines, Lot 21 and portion of FROM: _Dept..of Puhlic Wnrks - Fn�_ (liv_ S�B,E�T: Tentative and Final Pa�r�� ap to adjust Lot 22. Kenmar Terrac —2� 616 �nd ?fi7� S,�r� Recommendation. It is recommended that Council concur with the Commission and approve this Tentative and Final Parcel Map. Background. The Commission at their April 23, 1984 meeting reviewed the attached staff memo and map. The purpose of this map is to exchange 171 square feet of land by adjusting property lines around pool decking and equipment. The Commission recommends that Council approve this map. -- Exhibit. Staff inemo and Map; P.C. Minutes i i � F ank C. Erbacher City Engineer FCE/ls Att. cc: Mr. Garibaldi Mr. Moran Chas. Kavanaugh, P. E. � , � #< , , 7d Coc�n�c�� ,a U/rzG AGENDA MEMO 7-� T0: Planning Commission FROM: Dept. of Public Works - Engr. Div. April 3, 1984 �� ` � t,� s Re: Tentative and Final Parcel Map to adjust property lines, Lot 21 and portion of Lot 22, Kenmar Terrace 2616 and 2620 Summit Drive - Map 84-6 The attached Tentative and Final Parcel Maps show the proposed lot line ad- justment between these two lots. The pool and equipment installed by Permit in 1961 for 2620 Summit encroach into the property of 2616 Summit Drive. This lot line adjustment places all of these improvements entirely within Parcel 21-A (2620 Summit) leaving Parcel 22-A (2616 Summit). The total exchange of property is 171 square feet. Staff has reviewed this proposal and it meets all zoning and planning requirements. It is recommended that this Tentative and Final Parcel Map be forwarded to Council for approval. , i % j' .��%G�/ Frank C. Erbacher City Engineer FCE:mg Encls. (T. Map and F. Map, Notice of Exemp.) cc: Mr. Garibaldi 2620 Summit Drive, Burlingame Mr. Moran 2616 Summit Drive, Burlingame Chas. Kavanaugh, P. E. 708 Carolan Ave. Burlingame, Ca. , .: . � PROJECT APPLICATION 4��C1TY �.� 2616-2620 Summit Drive �r CEQA ASSESSMENT BURLINGAME pro,7ect address �'`'� � pro,7ect name - i f an Application received ( 3`22�84 � b"^^°��•`� Y Staff review/acceptance ( ) 1. APPLICANT Wi 11 i am Gari bal di 344-4641 name telephone no. 2620 Summit Drive, gurlinqame, Ca. 94010 applicant s address. street, city, zip code contact person, if different telephone no. 2 TYPE OF APPLICATION Specia.l Pe�rrit ( ) Variance* ( ) Conc�omi^ium Permit ( X) Other parcel Md *Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code ChapterP25.54. PROJECT DESCRIPTION I �. lin adi�,�tmantto move lot line �ool and oo�uinment installed in 1961 are partially into 2616 Summit Drive. Lot line adiustment to correct problem No new construction. 3. (attach letter of explanation if ac�ditional space is needed) Ref. code section(s): ( ) ( � 0 W& B Garibaldi - J&J Moran 2620 & 2616 Summit Drive land owner's name address Burlingame Ca. 94010 Renuired Date received city zip code (yes) (no) ( � � ) Proof of ownershi� (yes) (no) ( �� ) Owner's consent to application 5. EXISTIPJG SITE CONDITIONS Existing single family dwellinqs each parcel 4. PROPERTY IDEIITIFICATION (027-271-060 &-220)f21&ptn 22)( -- ) ( Kenmar Terrace APN lot no. block no. subdivision name ( R-1 � �13,068 S.F.& 17,13}l s.f.) zoning district land area, square feet Required Date received (yes) (� (3/22/84 ) �YeS) (3/22/84) ��) �no ) i ) (yes) (no) ( N/A ) (yes) (no) ( N/A � (other) ( ) Site plan sho�•�ing: property lines; public sidewall:s and curbs; all str�ctures and improvements; paved on-site parking; landscaping. Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area by tyoe of us� on each floor plan. Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant). Site cross secti.on(s) (if relevant). *Land use classifications are: residential (sho�.v # dwelling units); office use; retail sales; restaurant/cafe; mznufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described). 6. PROJECT PR�IPOSAL NO change Proposed censtruction, 3elow orade ( SF) Second floor ( SF) gross floor area first floor ( SF) Third floor ( S`) Project Code Project Code Pronosal Requirement Proposal Requirement Front setback Lot coverage Side setback fuildin� height Side yard Landscaoed area Rear yard On-site pkg.spaces � ., w , � y I � 0 6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued) EXISTING after 8-5 5 PM 7 Full tine emr,loyees on site Part tir�e emoloyees on site, Visitors/customers (�veekday) Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.) Residents on property Trip ends to/from site* Peak hour trip ends* Trucks/service vehicles IP! 2 YEARS after 8-5 5 PM IPI 5 YEARS after 8-5 5 PM *Show calculations on reverse side or attach senerate sheet. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAtJD USES - Residential Required �ate received (y�s.� (no) ( ) ��) (no) i ) Location plan of adjacent properties. Other tenants/firms on property: no. firr.�s ( ) no. e�ployees ( ) floor area occupied ( SF office space) ( SF other) no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( ) no. comoany venicles at this location ( ) 8. FEES Special Permit, all districts $100 O Other application type, fee $ 53 (X ) Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 () Project Assessment $ 25 () Variance/other districts $ 75 O Neoative Declaration $ 25 O Condominium Permit $ 50 O EIR/City & consultant fees $ O TOTAL FEES $�.�� RECEIPT N0. - Received by F}"dIIIC C. E1"�Ct I hereby certify under oenalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature not appl i cabl e oate Aoplicant STAFF USE OPlLY NEGATlUE DECLARATION F>>e No. The City of Burlingame by Frank C. Erbacher on Apl^11 2 , 1984, completed a review of the proposed project and determined that: ( X) It will not have a significant effect on the environment. ( ) No Environmental Imoact Report is required. Reasons for a con�i�s;or,: categorically exempt C.E.Q.A. Section 15105 (a) "Minor Lot in Adjs,stmPnt" City Engineer Title �/2/84 Dai:e Signed Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the c��te posted, the deternination shall be final../ DECLARATIO^J OF POSTI"1G Date Posted: Q�ij, � J�, �/�'�}' I declare under penalty of perjury that I arn City Clerk of th City of 6ur1 ngame and that I oosted a true copy of the abov2 Ne�a.tive Ceclaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to th= Council Chambers. �xecuted at 3urlingame, California on Qj,rJ ' �_ ,. 19�• Apoealed: ( )Yes ( )P!o JUDC--1�1�TT > ITY CLERK, CI �F 6URLIP�GA��tE ti �, ..� �d . P • t 1 � . � u.�t� C�if� �f �u�ii�tg�txit� SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 - TEL:(415) 342-8931 NOTICE OF HEARING TENTATIVE A��D FI�dAL PARCEL f�1AP NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Monday, the 23rd day of April, 1984 , at the hour of 7:30 P.M., in the City Hall Council Chambers , 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame will conduct a public hearing on the application to realiqn the common lot line between 2616 and 2620 Summit Drive; bv Kavanaqh Enqineerinq for William Garibaldi and John Moran (applicants and property owners) At the time of the hearing all persons interested will be heard. For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department. MARGARET MONROE CITY PLAN�IER April 13, 1984 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 April 23, 1984 Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. Vladimir Sommer, applicant,stated installation of curb and gutter would improve safety, there was curb previously which was demolished when street was raised; is trying to subdivide according to city regulations and not asking for any exceptions. There were no audience comments in favor. Those speaking in opposition: Margaret Gilderbloom, 2845 Canyon Road; Charles Iverson, 2841 Canyon Road; Nat Repetto, 2109 Summit Drive; John Khouri, 2849 Canyon Road; Jim Eckels, 2855 Canyon Road. Their concerns: destruction of the environment for a profit, would lower property values in the area, impacts on the creek and increased flooding conditions, would like to see consistency of city and county minimum lot sizes in this area. Applicant spoke in rebuttal: there is no consistency in existing lots in the county, can understand concern of new own�rs who just moved in and experienced the worst flood in years, with a 10,000 SF lot and required setbacks for the area can build a three bedroom home/two car garage without affecting the creek; farther up the canyon a house was built right over the creek, maybe he's not a very good neighbor and now the neighbors want to get even, but dirt should be left in the neighborhood and let stink. There were no further audience comments and the public hearing was closed. Discussion: home built over the creek is in the county; creek is all on private land, city can only look at the improvements placed on properties to assure they are good practice; is there any way the city or county can increase capacity of the creek or alleviate flooding problems; city looks at good engineering conditions, would ask to have capacity confirmed and try to keep development out of regular flow areas; this is a flat parcel, proposed land division will not exacerbate conditions; existing garage is wide enough for two cars parked tandem, it is accessed off.Summit Drive; city is requiring paved backup area on Canyon Road with a creek berm or wall if necessary; applicant's property was annexed to the city and he should be allowed to develop this large parcel to city standards; can appreciate the feelings of residents of the hills area. C. Schwalm moved that this tentative and final parcel map be recommended to City Council for approval with the three conditions listed in the City Engineer's agenda memo of April 17, 1984; second C. Garcia. Comment on the motion: concern about development on the newly created parcel, staff advised city will closely monitor any development of this parcel. Motion passed 6-1 on roll call vote; C. Taylor dissenting. �TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP TO ADJUST PROPERTY LINES AT 2616 AND 2620 SUMMIT DRIVE (LOT 21 AND PORTION OF LOT 22, KENMAR-TERRACE), BY KAVANAGH ENGINEERING FOR WILLIAM GARIBALDI AND JOHN MORAN Reference CE Erbacher's agenda memo of April 3, 1984 with attached map, Project Application & CEQA Assessment dated 3/22/84 and Notice of Nearing mailed April 13, 1984. CE reviewed this proposed realignment of common lot line which would place all pool and equipment improvements installed in 1961 at 2620 Summit entirely within this parcel rather than encroaching into the property at 2616 Summit Drive; proposal meets all zoning and planning requirements. CE recommended the map be forwarded to Council for approval. Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Garcia moved that this tentative and final parcel map be recommended to City Council for approval; second C. Leahy. Motion approved unanimously on roll call vote. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 23, 1984 CALL TO ORDER � A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was called to order by Chairman Graham on Monday, April 23, 1984 at 7:31 P:M. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Staff Present: Commissioners Garcia, Giomi,-Graha�-, �acobs, Leahy, Schwalm, Taylor (excused at 8:50 P.M.) None City Planner Margaret Monroe; City Attorney Jerome F. Coleman; City Engineer Frank C. Erbacher MINUTES - The minutes of the April 9, 1984 meeting were unanimously approved. AGENDA - Order of the agenda approved. ELECTION OF OFFICERS The Chair asked for nominations. C. Taylor nominated Harry Graham as Chairman for another year; second C. Leahy. C. Jacobs moved the nominations be closed. C. Graham elected Chairman on unanimous voice voie. C. Schwalm nominated Bill Garcia for Vice Chairman; second C. Taylor. C. Jacobs moved the nominations be closed. C. Garcia elected Vice Chairman on unanimous voice vote. C. Jacobs nominated Nannette Giomi for Secretary; second C. Taylor. C. Giomi elected Secretary on unanimous voice vote. Entire slate of officers reelected for the 1984-85 term. ITEMS FOR ACTION 1. TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR RESUBDIVISION OF LAND AT 2840 CANYON ROAD (PORTION OF BLOCK 2; BURLINGAME HILLS N0: 2); BY EDWIN H. SNIITH FOR VLADIMIR SOMMER CE Erbacher reviewed this item. Reference CE's memo of April 17, 1984, aerial photograph and tentative and final map. Applicant wishes to divide the subject R-1 parcel into two lots, one 10,000 SF minimum and one 13,Ob0 SF; proposal is consistent with zoning requirements and categorically exempt under CEQA guidelines. CE recommended this map be forwarded to Council for approval with three conditions as listed in his agenda memo. He distributed copy of Assessor's map indicating sizes of adjacent lots. Site was annexed to the City of Burlingame in 1981; San Mateo County had no comment on this application. Letters in opposition received April 23, 1984 were noted from the following: N. J. and Shirley Repetto, 2109 Summit Drive; John and Claire Khouri, 2849 Canyon Road; Margaret and Murray Gilderbloom, 2845 Canyon Road; and Charles and Judit.h Iverson, 2841 Canyon Road. Commission/staff discuss.ion: requirements for installation of curb and gutter along Canyon Road; concerns about impact on the creek expressed in letters of opposition; city is not proposing removal of the stone pillars at the entrance to Canyon Road, they are in city right-of-way, would need an encroachment permit to remove; minimum lot size in the county in this area is 20,000 SF, minimum lot size in the city adjacent to the area is 10,000 SF.