Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2600 Summit Drive - FYI Memo� 4 � BURLI IVGAME 3 ! DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM November 6, 2012 Director's Report Planning Commission Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner FYI — REQUESTED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits for height and attached garage for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2010 (June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). On September 10, 2012, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved an FYI for 2600 Summit Drive, that included removing all grids from the windows and doors at the rear elevation and on the windows and doors towards the rear of the left elevation and to change the size of the glass doors at the rear of the house (September 10, 2012, FYI memo attached). A building permit was issued on May 30, 2012 and the project is currently under construction. In a letter dated October 17, 2012, the project designer is requesting an FYI to: add an uncovered balcony off the second floor Master bedroom towards the rear corner of the house, which includes replacing some windows with French doors, and which will enlarge the approved lot coverage and floor area ratio by 70.1 SF (6,586 SF, 0.08 FAR proposed); remove a window from the garage along the front elevation; reduce the size of several windows along each elevation; and remove the shed roof extension from the turret off the formal dining room. The designer submitted a letter and originally approved and proposed building elevation drawings, date stamped October 23, 2012, to explain the proposed changes to the previously approved design review project. Other than the proposed revisions listed above and detailed in the designers letter date stamped October 23, 2012, there are no other changes proposed to the design of the house. Planning staff would note that because of the minor revisions proposed to the house, it was determined that the project could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner c. Jesse Geurse, 405 Bayswater Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010, designer. ATTACHMENTS: Explanation letter from designer, date stamped October 23, 2012 Previous FYI memo from September 10, Planning Commission Meeting Previous explanation letter for changes, date stamped August 24, 2012 June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Regular Action Minutes Proposed Second Level Floor Plan and originally approved and proposed Building Elevations, date stamped October 23, 2012 �, . Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, California 94010 October 17, 2012 City of Burlingame Attn: Erica Strohmeier, Zoning Technician 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 re: FYI-2 for rear elevation window revision and minor alterations to the residence located at 2600 Summit Road for planning and planning commission review and approvaL Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Planning / Planning Commission, Mr and Mrs. Gumas had requested some additional alteration to the residence due interior issues and minor modifications to exterior due to previously approved FYI-1 We had made all revisions in attached 11"x17" FYI-1 plans and explain the changes as follows: 1) REQUEST APPROVAL TO REMOVE WINDOW AND REPLACE WITH FRENCH DOOR FOR ACCESS TO NEW BALCONY FOR BAY VIEW FROM MASTER BEDROOM. 2) REQUEST APPROVAL TO REMOVE FRENCH DOORS AND BALCONY DUE TO FURNITURE PLACEMENT AND REPLACE WITH WINDOWS 3) REQUEST APPROVAL REDUCED SIZE OF WINDOW IN CLOSET DUE TO CLOSET DESIGN. 4) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF GRIDS DUE TO BAY VIEW. WINDOWS NOT VISIBLE FROM FRONT OF RESIDENCE. 5) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REDUCTION OF WINDOW HEIGHT IN BATHROOM DUE TO PRIVACY AND ADJACENT NEIGHBORS PRIVACY. 6) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF WINDOW IN GARAGE DUE TO FUTURE SHELVING ON INTERiOR. 7) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF SHED ROOF EXTENSION AT TURRET TO SIMPLIFY THE DESIGN. 8) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF WINDOWS EACH SIDE DUE TO INTERIOR KICTHEN CABINET CONFLICT 9) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF TRANSOMS FOR FULL HEIGHT CLEAR WINDOWS FOR BAY VIEW DUE TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FYI-1 -�- ��� �C I �_ � 'c�,'`'_ �; _ ��� •;;,;= ��::�,�r.� �y�_, . � ,, ... � -��:f. �,.. GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS OCTOBER 17, 2012 10) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REDUCE HEIGHT OF WINDOW DUE TO FURNITURE PLACEMENT IN MASTER BEDROOM LOUNGE. Thank you for your attention regarding this proj ect. Should you ha�e additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at 650.703.6197 Sincerely, Jesse Geurse Principal � c ,..— _ _: � � :� n � � tJ �. � �� �y L'u i % . ' `.� �� .'=;i..�_ ^-'S.�'' �,. _, . .� ., ..._..... _._� t`.. 2 k � HilIZ LI NCsAM� � DATE: TO: FROM: GITY OF �URLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM September 4, 2012 Planning Commission Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner Director's Repori Meeting Date: September 10, 2012 SUBJECT: FYI — REQUESTED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits for height and attached garage for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2010 (June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permit was issued on May 30, 2012 and the project is currently under construction. In a letter dated August 24, 2012, the project architect is requesting an FYI to remove all grids from the windows and doors at the rear elevation and on the windows and doors towards the rear of the left elevation and to change the size of the glass doors at the rear of the house. The designer submitted a letter and originally approved and proposed rear and left side elevation drawings, date stamped August 24, 2012, to explain the proposed changes to the previously approved design review project. Other than the proposed revisions listed above and detailed in the designers letter dated August 24, 2012, there are no other changes proposed to the design of the house. Planning staff would note that because of the minor revision to the windows at the rear and left side of the house, it was determined that the project could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner c. Randy Grange, TRG Architects, 205 Park Road # 203, Burlingame, CA 94010, architect. ATTACHMENTS: Explanation letter from designer, date stamped August 24, 2012 June 28, 2010, Planning Commission RegularAction Minutes Originally approved and proposed rear and left side Building Elevations, date stamped August 24, 2012 � Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, Califomia 94010 August 22, 2012 City of Burlingame attn: Erica Strohmeier, Zoning Technician 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 re: FYI-1 for rear elevation window revision to the residence located at 2600 Sumtnit Road for planning and planning commission review and approval. Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Planning / Planning Commission, Mr and Mrs. Gumas had requested a minor alteration to the residence due to the beautiful 180 plus view of the Bay, City of San Francisco and San Jose. We had demolished the residence and cleaned the site and what we saw was a georgeous view. Due to this view we would like to change the rear elevation windows and doors "ONLY" We had made all revisions in attached 11"xl7" FYI-1 plans and explain the changes as follows: 1) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR THE REMOVAL OF GRIDS DUE TO SPECTACULAR VIEWS. GRIDS REMOVED DUE TO VISUAL OBSTRUCTION. TYPICAL ONLY AT REAR OF RESIDENCE. 2� REQUEST APPROVAL FOR THE REMOVAL OF GRIDS AND 1NCREASED DOOR SIZE IN W1DTH. Thank you for your attention regarding this project. Should you have additional questions or conceins, please do not hesitate to contact us at 650.703.6197 Sincerely, Jesse Gei Principal � ; � ..�� i e; �„, 2 j `` � _ �. __._, . .. . :—. r..:�:3. � %� ;� J G - . L',� ��r,r�.��= ��t:,_!r•.°cH:,�;- �ii�"�f�F���lo�I�i":�LI i..}��� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes June 28, 2010 2. 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR ATTACHED GARAGE AND BUILDING HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (JESSE GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, INC., APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND JOHN AND JANICE GUMAS, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference stafF report dated June 28, 2010, with attachments. Community Development Director Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirteen (13) conditions were suggested for consideration. Noted letters received from John Gumas, 2600 Summit Drive, and Chris Ngai and Yolanda Leung, 2606 Summit Drive indicating that a compromise has been reached regarding the project design. Chair Terrones opened the public hearing. Jesse Geurse, 405 Bayswater Avenue represented the applicant: ■ Have redesigned the project to the satisfaction of the neighbors at 2606 Summit Drive. Commission comments: ■ Have done a wonderful job on the redesign of the structure; will be a nice looking structure. ■ Requested clarification of the window style. (Geurse—will be aluminum-clad exterior, wood interior.) ■ Glad that the neighbors have come to a resolution regarding the trees. ■ The view issue was the primary concern of the Planning Commission; modifications to the design have substantially reduced any view impacts. Public comments: Chris Ngai and Yolanda Leung, 2606 Summit Drive; John Gumas, 2600 Summit Drive; spoke: Agree that the view blockage has been minimized. Have also received permission from the property owner to trim trees in order to preserve views to the Bay. Happy with the Commission's desire to have problems resolved between the neighbors. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: Glad an agreement has been reached between the neighbors, but doesn't like to see the project held hostage to achieve a desired end. Commissioner Cauchi moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the followrng conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 18, 2010, sheets T.0 through A.9 and Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materiais shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 5 i C/TY OF BURL/NGAME PLANNING COMMISSIOIV — Approved Minutes June 28, 2090 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which wouid include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's April 23, 2010 and February 5, 2009 memos, the City Engineer's May 1, 2010 and December 15, 2008 memos, the Parks Supervisor'sApril 30, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's April 26, 2010 and November 24, 2008 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's April 26, 2010 and November 21, 2008 memos shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall complywith the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires afFected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of fhe California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SFiALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDIiVG INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 6 ,� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMM/SS/ON — Approved Minutes June 28, 2010 The motion was seconded 6y Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: ■ Regardless of what the neighbors eventually agreed to; the project is now approvable whetherornot the neighbors approved of it. Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advrsed. This item concluded at 7:37 p.m. 7 FIRST + SECOND STORY ADDIT�QN TO THE RESIDENCE u Geurse Conceptnal Designs, Inc ' for MR. AND MRS. GUMAS .. 2G00 SUMMIT DRIVE, BURLINGANIE CAi.IrORNIA 94010 ��,,.,���� ABBREVIATIONS ARCHITECTURAL LEGEND FiRE PROTECTION PROJECT DATA S.3EET IIr'DEX `°"""`° �"` sxeW����moueiiroirtni[�anmEsmurn'uunous�7'�.xnm�m.anm.m�imnnaxiorvohoen�m[raartrnonca.m,vmum.�ov y,w�eaoux x5N um^^ova.re u IXimnewNltoPGaw annnays9�orwmm�remxrnrorzronr+irtsnunnOneFFir�fx ���Th�P��paioeonmNeipetnuraoi[rnonww,wriovmvtnmouci� o�umna.oru� ma[PnnnLvxrSmvu �Ft.oiTxoirnonrn �4.WI0..14.1 xe4wnwxn�u.s.ninuees unvusv�nnAiE�sx.n.nr��r.[n�m,ucou'hnFmeo[rnaTMaMtoaurnOVN.rxiWiovmwmm� u uClrok vB ' n� . �ub �""b��� nye�iLa - x[wwnu r.vwnonoevcE/ncvam�r-wuN�,�rrurwnrzxiniuin�uxenr�wFrtmsrwleeviowxa:auiumennxssrfun,�i>siu�iinwsttvic xmwtu xEWwm . � . • . �eowairo u1oalDG+nIX.t c rom'rx�m cnrrx �L�'p,;,;'� xw� x.i.w.i.,�..t. .mvun�eoaJa.eair[Xvntvf.wtnmt��crtrmemortcnP'tsiEmnnnvnrmovEDBI'n@swMnlenCam�tt'wvoIX�m.'fN.11ELLmi3ntotw 'or.nat¢s �wo.nou� m. . �L���i.6. __________ CV51v:cWnuiONYpvfD ��0. Oi. � FlIOPJ5.1luuL�GPENOIFSSAVEn1E�Bn fi .I N,P.U+.. ISSOPSPna[uMll�naP.Tl.lro ' „ ����,�W�A ��"' `,p.M�. o����E DISCI.AIMER �xrsm�cE Lorcov�u,ce � �`w�p �„� ���.,,� � ,�.,. .�re � �,.��.�, �'ais�w�.� ------ rxor�n�� az3,z.w�. �, w ��o A.��..� rwox n.....m., uie�d . r. ��,�o-�,,��o.�o� k ow��oEof��c��.ew,nonsoa.� G,��,.n�. e�.3.w��E„u,��o ������.�aha .°��w��O ���•o �'����.s om�o"roxniErnx,usmvo��eownicoxuana u«�r.�•a�w,nene.Eccssnn,n,au9o�soxMoxea.�,ur�n.vHmem�re,aornreuanwmec z„a .n.x,ux- �x r*. � srs�n��vn.ouiomio.vn,w sm�or rn. n =� nie eos r.mois,a " —.—.— rr.irnnau�s� srcouoirvu.n.00ann,u u�asQ �..w. co.m�.xuis cvi,�n«aoxmeananorv.c cua�w.mus�f auoen.�.v �L . sn.o. `�' rcuaxrocvnmFEn¢rnOrtn �uwou.nnvsiuu.n�sOtu.�afsm�amis�oanitCqui�6 iMfl�roWrtUINQ�JFSSq10:ffSMDIAOCFllM6rt CRYOFBURIJNGAMEAll9WABLEFI.00RARFARAllO .k IRUR f�.M Nii �w�.S.a .dl�� SIxUCI11HL ACPOP � UnTx1UiME�.9o�iF.fCY. � o/ octtvJv.f.luQUmeoRn�in�¢w�k11 nrew�� oH.v�nil(I1cn[m�c7oxLLwYPzmroRlkRVK�ITN'tqU4�Dpnv¢C�:rzfsarznrnlnt�F51t��5InC tnn�v.mm�ARGeR3arzsQtt.�'.u3�orar�-z/.rznsQP[ . `uR 3r�� _ 6A QAOfnnRAInLCRWOY.RAW�vIrrnTlml'ntlqtMr➢x�pRRl.owun ` e , A �M/oniw� F�lviNrsN+ov[ryxniplSlrowEvfAnlESnono*cLnMn�l ccw.'IRncrouPWoannn�n�luom'mnmot,v:owna�¢vin'ccouroa.�wiMM'Cfwm�no¢�cvrcmncrG . pll oiMicw+m«iaM .__ vv,unoroemwmu�onssMv�n.vanofm�siavcna. FLOORARFACALCULAIION o,.� EBnR�N�1O .�..�w x�wn. w wi �M ,� �as��, �3 000a,wo�,�,00ws�w�G,n«3v.��,��x � �:w w�s : rn.�" , .s��an. oIT. °or",..� wavowm,�a. m : s..s �^ �., `�+ n�., %"' e��orQus�ax��.�,�c,oA,`�.°��N„°��;����o.,w.�ou:��,�.e����ron�Nruxox,w�uain�ni��enrrn�«��mmnux�•. _ II v::i.�i�cu....n � �s,wmsnma. , zan.».a n a vtc�uc�u,,w <4e � um:an. , t f1. „� ns��„W � r�r.vnnaNu�uvv.cc A�^�-san. � nrru�u�ucmwccunnunox v.n,voxrsn n.�.W = L�/ti.»�x] .. ���a= `N,� ���L��- ,.,,..,. N CODECOMPLIANL �r^PRO.TECTDIItECTORY u ��,�� ��� �n�,"~w� .,. �,. � � ♦ - � s«�o��wR�a�.�r�.f��.��.w � , .a...� m. ,,�v� —� ��,����,���� x���,.w��,,,�, o n � .n._ ,_ a�� "� �a�°��,���F����m�o�a.,,�,s ���, , �,a� ,. '��,'..., e ��v. �..., " Ps� �,.�'�.m°` � �„w �e.,�. � �,�«�a�a� ��������,�e�M�rooE �,.6 ��� o� , o�,v �a' �'�t *� �,. ��,�._ � �,� o ,��a�a�o���.��ak:,t� <A;���, �� P .rvw� ����a��o,n�nAn.o�U���.�,A�,����� �„�R���� a,,,.�., 6� ��^'J„"a' �°`` oR��,�.� n�,�of�,���,,,�a,��m� �, �d.e Q ���� e. .�: � , � � ��,6�� Q, �.,,,,�. � �. �,.,�„w o� ae... � ���e,. a ; �,�� ����.�' w. F �NMI au�.u�c: �.... corrs�ucnorr xouRs 0 C T 2� 2 0 i Z �n� e � ��"_�, �µ, �,� �k.,d.�. �. , _ �°�n�x��,�,°�aa� M��,��° ; �. i - �. b . � � c�� su�s_�� ��� �� ��a�c .��tiW. � w;o �� ,.� �,�.�.n,��,��.,,���,ow�v,., o��,.,P.o��en���,����.�m��,p��,����a���,o� � � ����� EQ0. �:p...� �.,�.. � �p��.n�W�����,.,,�,on„�.n��,=�M,ra�,.�N,.,=�.v�ro,��.,_�,�,��, ,� P��a�R _ . .. .. . �a� �,v_, ww�: ' � - w�n o a,� �� � ��,� �....m.w �� �rwe� m t� ,�.�w,A�� e�a�m�„� Q 0 �,� o ry ��. p -- BUILDtN� DEPT. GPNP,RAI.NOTES VICINITY MAP -0� � c� � o ,a, �a�n�� �r�m ,���e,�na�m„�,n�v.,� a� 4 �w e��x � <��;�����:,:m� oa�,woma<o�� oa'�.� �r+ro,��m�.�„wo� �d�;�,� ?�„� :'s. /�� �o,cennncv,.viu.unv,,m�x a" c. � d` � �� . reausin¢[.atui�n HIKId�OI'��: 9�� �� ����'" v.niFnc¢o:u�.�wo�on¢¢wiom loxxEr.nxomen n�eaeu.eunnmcuQv'mQiF�.'iSGWBEfot�9oNn¢�anVVm4m U ti,..^"i- : �:�. � a . v�. ..�. . A �,��� M91,�.�°�a ���'�; ��� �; �. �R�,n„� ,�..,u���wa,���,,�,�P�m„�,�,n�,a� dYa '; -a� Y Nu` :�Y: n �' � '�. 2a9:H �• � �� �3 g � -� . . � A � � . :E�a'�4�aY ' � � .' �I 3� S��a,e �(i � �;� � � s. ' �..`� �.�,�n��� }.'" HilBb.mough . � � y . ' 2 ' A ut!f1��,�. pm M f¢ 9✓"u . , � ��- F1RST+SECONDSTO TO77-IERESmENCE �� � MRANDMRS.CIIMAS � � 2600SIIMhiRDRR'E � BURLR:GAM� CAIdOIU.'IA 94010 '} a,m:rs�� ow.wwcm� � nEc� nn n v � ���`c .v�`�� V� �a yy � ��� °j?vam e� � �T.O � �� � ` '�� ���� �� ( C. ��c� avma, � , .. °B rn� ��wm