Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2600 Summit Drive - Staff Report (4)Item No. Design Review Study PROJECT LOCATION 2600 Summi� Drive Before Construction Uncier Consfruction City of Burlingame Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit Address: 2600 Summit Drive Item No. Regular Action Meeting Date: April 8, 2013 Request: Application forAmendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for changes to a previously approved first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling, and a new deck area off the rear of the house. Applicant and Designer: Jesse Geurse, Geurse Conceptual Design Inc. Property Owner: John Gumas General Plan: Low Density Residential APN: 027-014-100 Lot Area: 82,342 SF Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Article 19 Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, which staies that additions to existing structures are exempt provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF provided all public services and facilities are available and that the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Project Background: An application for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits for height and attached garage for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2_600 Summit Drive was. approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2010 (June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permit was issued on May 30, 2012, and construction is now underway. On September 10, 2012, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved an FYI for 2600 Summit Drive, that incCuded removing all grids from the windows and doors at the rear elevation and on the windows and doors towards the rear of the left elevation and to change the size of the glass doors at the rear of the house (September 10, 2012, FYI memo attached). On November 13, 2012, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved a second FYI for 2600 Summit Drive. That FYI approval included: adding an uncovered balcony off the second floor Master bedroom towards the rear corner of the house, which included replacing some windows with French doors, and which enlarged the approved lot coverage and floor area ratio by 70.1 SF (6,586 SF, 0.08 FAR proposed); removing a windowfrom th� garage along the front elevation; reducing the size of several windows along each elevation; and removing the shed roof extension from the turret off the formal dining room (November 13, 2012, FYI memo attached). Proposed Revisions: The applicant is now requesting an Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Pecmit for a new proposed deck addition off the rear of the house that will be greater than 30" above adjacent grade and will therefore count towards the proposed setback and lot coverage calculations. The portions of the proposed deck addition that will exceed 30" from adjacent grade will be set back a minimum of 15'-4" from the rear property line and will add 484 SF to the overall lot coverage on the property (6.3% lot coverage proposed, where 5.8% lot coverage was originally approved). The overall height of the proposed deck addition will range from at grade to over 10' above adjacent grade in certain locations due to the slope on the lot. Please refer to the attached letter and revised plans submitted by the applicant, dated March 21, 2013, for an explanation of the proposed new deck addition. Summary (based on plans submitted March 21, 2013): This large and oddly-shaped lot is located at the corner of Summit Drive and Belvedere Court in the Hillside Area. The narrow portion of the lot, along Summit Drive, is considered to be the lot front. The applicant is proposing a first and second story addition to the existing two-story, 3,997 square foot single- family dwelling. On the first floor, the applicant is proposing to reconfigure the interior and add a formal dining room, entry hall and turret, and new garage to the front of the structure. On the second floor, the applicant is proposing to add a hallway, master bath and closets, and an additional bedroom. With the proposed addition, the floor area will increase to 6,516 SF (0.08 FAR) where the zoning code allows a maximum of 8,000 SF (0.10 Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit 2600 Summit Drive FAR). The proposed project is 1,484 SF below the maximum allowable floor area. The proposed structure will be 33'-4" above the average top of curb, which req;�ires a Special Permit. With this project, there is no increase to the number of potential bedrooms proposed (five existing). Three parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required on site. Two covered parking spaces (20' x 20' clear interior dimensions) will be provided in the new attached garage, and the required uncovered parking space (9' x 20') will be provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant was approve� for the following applications on June 28, 20'! 0: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010, a, 5); ■ Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.61.0203; ■ Special Permit for an attached garage (C.S. 25.26.035, a); and ■ Special Permit for building height between 30' and 36' (33'-4" proposed) (�.S. 25.26.060, a, 1). 2600 Summit Drive Lot Size: 82,342 SF Plans date stamped: March 21, 2013 and June 18, 2010 PREVIOUS APPROVAL REVISED PROPOSAL ; ALLOWED/ (06/18/10 plans) (03/21/13 plans) REQUIRED SETBACKS : Fronf (9st f/r): ; 131' (to formal DR) no change 15'-0" (2nd flr): ; 143' (to turret) no change 20'-0" Side (left): ; 7'-0" (to garage) no change 7'-0" (right): ; 40'-0" no change 7'-6" Rear (1st flr): ; 56'-5" (to FR/dining) 15'-4" (to deck) 15'-0" (2nd f/r): � 53'-4" (to MB) no change 20'-0" Lot Coverage: ; 4,755 SF 5,239 SF 32,937 SF 5.8% 6.3% 40% — — .....------------..__...__ FAR: ; 6,516 SF no change 8,000 SF' 0.08 FAR 0.10 FAR # of bedrooms: ; 5 no change --- Parking: ; 2 covered 2 covered (20' x 20') no change (20' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') ---------....._.._._....--- -------------._....._..__....----...._...----------------.._..-----.._...----------......-----..__....... Height: � 33'-4" Z no change 30'-0" DH Envelope: complies no change CS 25.28.075 ' The maximum single-family residential house size shall be 8,000 gross square feet, including accessory structures (CS 25.26.070 e). 2 Special Permit for a structure between 30' and 36' as measured from average top of curb (33'-4" proposed) (CS 25.26.060 a, 1) was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2010. Staff Comments: Planning staff would note that because of the size and location of the proposed new deck addition, it was determined that the project would be brought forward to the Planning Commission as a study 2 Amendmenf to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit 2600 Summit Drive item and not directly as a RegularAction Item. See attached memo from the Chief Building Official dated March 25, 2013 and original project memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a Hillside Area Construction Permit by ihe Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by constructio,n of the existing distant views of nearby properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views f.rom habitable areas within a dwelling unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060). Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 21, 2013, sheets T.O, SP.2, A.8 and A.9 (Rear Elevation - North); and date stamped June 18, 2010, sheets SP.1, SP.3 through A.9 (Building Section) and Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Cliief Building Official's March 26, 2013, April 23, 2010 and February 5, 2009 memos, the City Engineer's May 1, 2010 and December 15, 2008 memos, the Parks Supervisor's April 30, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's April 26, 2010 and November 24, 2008 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's April 26, 2010 and November 21, 2008 memos shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans 3 Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit 2600 Summit Drive throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, piumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclinq_ Ordinance which requires afFected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL LE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that -the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shali be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to t.he Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner c. Jesse Geurse, 405 Bayswater Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010, applicant and designer Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Applicant's Explanation Letter, date stamped March 21, 2013 Chief Building Official comments, dated March 26, 2013 Copy of FYI memo from November 13, 2012 Planning Commission Meeting Applicant's letter of explanation for FYI #2, date stamped October 23, 2012 Copy of FYI memo from September 10, 2012 Planning Commission Meeting Applicant's letter of explanation for FYI #1, date stamped August 24, 2012 Minutes from the June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Regular Action Meeting Staif Comments (from previously approved project) Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed March 29, 2013 Aerial Photo 0 � CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPAIZ'CMFN'f 50I PRIMROSE ROAD P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 Y �* �,�„�.�E APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �.�,...�'r Type of application: Design Review ■ Conditional Use Permit Variance S�,ecial Permit Other Parcel Number: Project address: 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE BURLINGAI�IE, CA. 9�4010 APPLICANT � Name: GEiJRSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, INC. Address: '�05BAYSWATEIZAVENLTE City/State/Zip: $UKLINGAMF CA.9-40T0 Phone (w): G50.703.6197 (��; G50.343.3093 G50.558.9324 ARCHTTECT/DESIGNER Name: GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, INC. Address: `�05BAYSWATERAVENUE City/State/Zip: B�-INGAME, CA 94010 Phone (w): �50.703.Gi97 ���; G503433093 ��: G50.558.932� PRG�ERTY OWNER JOHN GUMAS Address� 2600SiJMMTTD�tIVE ' City/State/Zip: BURLINGAME,CA.94010 Phone (w): �15�621.-7575 (h)�. ��� Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person %r this project. PROJECT DESCRIPT`ION: �W DECKEXTENSIONATEXISTINGPOOLDECKING. AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I he y r�i�under penalty of perjury that the infarmation given herein is true and correct to e�bes of my�nowledge and belief. <� i r / Applicant's I know about the application to the Property owner's f Date: 3/2G/13 authorize the above applicant to su6mit this Date: 3/2G/13 PCAPP.FRM Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, California 94010 March 20, 2013 City of Burlingame Attn: Erica Strohmeier, Zoning Technician 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: Admenment to design review for new deck extension to the residence located at 2600 Stuiunit Road for planning and planning commission review and approval. Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Planning / Planning Commission, Please fmd enclosed a proposed new deck extension as an amendment to design review for the above mentioned project that is still under construction. We are looking for approval for the deck e�tension for the reason that we will be landscaping and hardscaping the rear yard area and around the pool. The pool deck and coping are slated to be re- hardscaped in lightweight stone pa�ers. In designing we would like to extend the rear pool deck outward for larger surface area for the enjoyment of the pool surrounding. The deck would also be surfaced with lightweight stone pavers to match the new pool hardscape. We asked the commissioners to please review and approve the added deck eatension. Thank you for your attention regarding this project. Should you have additional questions or concems, p�e do not hesitate to contact us at 650.703.6197 Sincerely, Jesse Geur�e ,� . Principal � � . r-�� - —_ -- ��-:_s�.. _ ��_ - �',. � �: ,T � ��j�• r,—.-i � r� r1 "; :i�4�:ePi�l' — -. ...��'il'•�U r;n. ��r � Project Comments Date: To: From: March 25, 2013 � Engineering Division (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 � Fire Division (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-7204 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review Amendment and Hillside Area Construction Permit for changes to an approved first and second story addition to an existing single family dweiiing, including a new deck area off the rear of the house at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-110 Staff Review: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable�, 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrat�l on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. Provide fully dimensioned plans. 6) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 7) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 8) Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the aliowable lot coverage. Consulfthe Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" i� height. 9) Provide handrails at all _stairs where there are four or more risers. 10)Provide lighting at all exterior landings 11)Provide complete details on the plans that show compliance with the swimming pool barrier requirements. 2010 CBC §3109 Revi 3-26-2013 � Bi1RLIN�AM� _'� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF BURLINGAME Community Development Department MEMORANDUM November 6, 2012 Director's Report Planning Commission Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 Erica Strohmeier, Associate Pianner FYI — REQUESTED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVFD DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review, Hiliside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits for height and attached garage for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2�00 Summit Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2010 (June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). On September 10, 2012, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved an FYI for 2600 Summit Drive, that.included removing all grids from the windows and doors at the rear elevation and on the windows and doors towards the rear of the left elevation and to change the size of the glass doors at the rear of the house (September 10, 2012, FYI memo attached). A building permit was issued on May 30, 2012 and the project is currently under construction. In a letter dated October 17, 2012, the project designer is requesting an FYI to: add an uncovered balcony off the second floor Master bedroom towards the rear corner of the house, which includes replacing some windows with French doors, and which will enlarge the approved lot coverage and floor area ratio by 70.1 SF (6,586 SF, 0.08 FAR proposed); remove a window from the garage along the front elevation; reduce the size of several windows along each elevation; and remove the shed roof extension from the turret off the formal dining room. The designer submitted a letter and originally approved and proposed building elevation drawings, date stamped October 23, 2012, to e��lain the proposed changes to the previously approved design review project. Other than the proposed revisions listed above and detailed in the designers letter date stamped October 23, 2012, there are no other changes proposed to the design of the house. Planning staff would note that because of the minor revisions proposed to the house, it was determined that the project could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner c. Jesse Geurse, 405 Bayswater Avenue, Buriingame, CA 94010, designer. ATTACHMENTS: � Explanation letter from designer, date stainped October 23, 2012 Previous FYI memo from September 10, Planning Commission Meeting Previous explanation letterfor changes, date stamped August 24, 2012 June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Regufar Action Minutes Proposed Second Level Floor Plan and originally approved and proposed stamped October 23, 2012 Building Elevations, date �eurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, California 94010 - October 17, 2012 City of Burlingame Attn: Erica Strohmeier, Zoning Technician 501 Prunrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 re: FYI-2 for rear elevation window revision and minor alterations to the residence located at 2600 Sumti�it Road for nlauiii.ng and plaiiuing commission review and approval. Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Pla�u�ing / Plauning Commission, Mr and Mrs. Gumas had requested some additional alteration to the residence due interior issues and minor modifications to e�terior due to previously approved FYI-1 We had made all revisions in attached 11"xl7" FYI-1 plans and explain the changes as follows: 1) REQUEST APPROVAL TO REMOVE WINDOW AND REPLACE WITH FRENCH DOOR FOR ACCESS TO NEW BALCONY FOR BAY VIEW FROM MASTER BEDROOM. 2) REQUEST APPROVAL TO REMOVE FRENCH DOORS AND BALCONY DUE TO FURNITURE PLACEMENT AND REPLACE WITH WIIJDOWS 3) REQUEST APPROVAL REDUCED SIZE OF WINDOW IN CLOSET DUE TO CLOSET DESIGN. 4) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF GRIDS DUE TO BAY VIEW. WINDOWS NOT VISIBLE FROM FRONT OF RESIDENCE. 5) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REDUCTION OF WIISDOW HEIGHT IN BATI�i00M DUE TO PRIVACY AND AD7ACENT NEIGHBORS PRIVACY. 6) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR RBMOVAL OF WINDOW lN GARAGE DUE TO FUTURE SHELVING ON IN1`ERIOR 7) . REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF SHED ROOF EXTENSION AT TIJRRET TO SIMPLIFY ' THE DESIGN. . 8) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF WINDOWS EACH SIDE DUE TO INTERIOR KICTHEN CABINET CONFLICT 9) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF TRANSOMS FOR FULL F�IGHT CLEAR WII�IDOWS FOR BAY VIEW DUE TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FYI-1 - GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS OCTOBER 17, 2012 lOj -REQUEST APPROVAL FO'�2 REDUCE HEIGHT OF WINDOW DUE TO FURN:"I�JRE PLACEMENT IN MASTER BEDROOM LOUNGE. Thank you for your attention regarding this proj ect. Should you have additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at 650.703.6197 Sincerely, Jesse Geurse Principal r-- . z GITY= d,y.(c' ._'- - ' -.Cih`.. : , � 1'-. -_, :� _ - a DATE TO f�:���il CITY OF gURLINGAMIinE Community Development Deparfinent MEMORAND UM September 4, 2012 Planning Commission Director's Report Meeting Date: September 10, 2012 Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner SUBJ�CT: FYI — REQUES i ED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGN REV[EW PROJECT AT 2600 SUMMITDRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits for height and aftached garage for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2010 (June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permit was issued on May 30, 2012 and t� e�roject is currently under construction. in a letter dated August 24, 2012, the pr.oject architect is requesting an FYI to remove all grids from the windows and doors at the rear elevation and on the _windows and doors towards the rear of the [eft elevation and to change the size of the glass doors at the rear of the house. The designer submitted a letter and originally approved and proposed rear and left side elevation drawings, date stamped August 24, 2012, to explain the proposed changes to the previously approved design review project. Other than the proposed revisions listed above and detailed in the designers letter dated August 24, 2012, there are no other changes proposed to the design of the house. Planning staff would note that because of the minor revision to the windows at the rear and left side of the house, it was determined that the project could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an: action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner c. Randy Grange, TRG Architects, 205 Park Road # 203, Burlingame, CA 94010, architect. ATTACHMENTS: Explanation letter from designer, date stamped August 24, 2012 June 28, 2010, Plan.ning Commission Regular Action Minutes Originally approved and propased rear and left side Building Elevations, date stamped August 24, 2012 Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, Califomia 94010 August 22, 2012 City of Burlingame atin: Erica Strohmeier, Zoning Techn�cian 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 re: FYI-1 for rear elevation window revision to the residence located at 26Q0 Summit Road for plarming and planuing commission review and approval. Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Plauiung / Planviug Commission, Mr and Mrs. Gumas had requested a minor alteration t� th� residence due to the beautifitl 180 plus view of the Bay, City of San Francisco and San Jose. We had demolished the residence and cleaned the site and what we saw was a georgeous view. Due to this view we would like to change the rear elevation windows and doors "ONLY" We had made all revisions in attached 11"x17" FYI-1 plans and explain the changes as follows: 1) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR TI� REMOVAL OF GRIDS DUE TO SPECTACULAR VIEWS. GRIDS REMOVED DUE TO VISUAL OBSTRUCTION. TYPICAL ONLY AT REAR OF RESIDENCE. 2� REQUEST APPROVAL FOR'�HE REMOVAL OF GRIDS AND INCREASED DOOR SIZE IN VdIDTH. Thank you for your attention regarding this proj ect. Should you have additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at 650.703.6197 Sincerely, Jesse Get Principal �=-4 - _ -�r. _ r ,, � � � _ ���' ! � -- _ � �_ . . ��,�;` v� i'.t.. - ��..��. .., v`L;�,�" :(t.�ij;�„� ,�, .. CITY OF BUI2LINGAME PLANNING COMM/SSION — Approved Minutes June 28, 2010 2. 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE, z'.ONED R-1 - AP-PLIeATION FOR DESfGN REVIEW, HILLS�DE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR ATTACHED GARA,_GE AND BUILDING HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (JESSE GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, INC., APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND JOHN AND JANICE GUMAS, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF COfvTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated June 28, 2010, with attachments. Community Development Qirector �Jleeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. T-hirteen (13) conditions were suggested for consideration. Noted IetEers received from John Gumas, 2600 Summit Drive, and Chris Ngai and Yolanda Leung, 2606 Summit Drive indicating that a compromise has been reached regarding the project design. Chair Terrones �pened the pub(ic hearing. Jesse Geurse, 40.5 Bayswater Avenue represen#ed the applicant: ■ Have redesigned the projecf :o the satisfaction of the neighbors at 2606 Summit Drive. Commission comments: ■ Have done a wonderful job on the redesign of the structure; wil( be a nice looking �tructure. ■ Requested clarification of the window style. (Geurse—will be aluminum-clad exterior, wood interior.) ■ Gfad that the neighbors have come to a resolution regarding the trees. = The view issue was the primary concern of the Planning Commission; modifications to the design have substanfially reduced any view impacts. Public comments: Chris Ngai and Yolanda Leung, 2606 Summit Drive; John Gumas, 2600 Summit Drive; spoke: ■ Agree that the view blockage has been'minimized. ■ Have also received permission from the properly owner to trim trees in order to preserve views to the Bay. ■ Happy with the Commission's desire to have probfems resolved between the neighbors. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: ■ Glad an agreement has been reached between the neighbors, but doesn't like to see the project held hostage to achieve a desired end. Commissioner Cauchi moved to approve the applicafion, by resolution, with the fol%wing conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submiited to the Planning Division date stamped June 18, 2010, sheets T.0 through A.9 and Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staffl; 5 CITX OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes June 28, 2010 3. tha� any changes fo the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would inciude adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. fhat the conditions of the Chief Building O�cial`s April 23, 2010 and February 5, 2009 memos, the City Enginee�'s May 1, 2010 and December 15, 2008 memos, the Parks Superviso�'s April 30, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshai's April 26, 2010 and November 24, 2008 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's April 26, 2CT10 and November 21, 2008 memos shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters forthe construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to compfy with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for constructicn of fhe project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall complywith the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires afFected demolition, new construction and aiteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or e7cterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shafl meet afl the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shali provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shail be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be schedufed; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certificati�n of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 6 CITY OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes June 28, 2010 The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: ■ Regardless of what the neighbors eventually agreed to; the project is now approvabie whetherornot the neighbors approved of it. Chair Terrones called for a voice vote on the m�tion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:37 p,m. 7 Project Comments Date: April 22, 2010 To: af City Engineer (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (fi50) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 From: Planning Staff ❑ Recycling Specialist (650) 558-7273 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 CJ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Speciai Pe� m�� for an attached garage for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dweiling at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-110 Staff Review: N/A All previous comments still apply. Reviewed by: V V Date: 5101I2010 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Amendment to Desiqn Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for chanqes to a previouslv approved first and second story addition to an existinq sinqle familv dwellinq and a new deck area ofF the rear of the house at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, John Gumas, property Qwner, APN: 027-271-110; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on April 8, 2013, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written rnaterials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exernpt provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF provided all public services and facilities are available and that the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. 2. Said Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Pianning Commission held on the 8`h day of April, 2013 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categoricai Exemption and Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit. 2600 Summit Drive Effective April 18, 2013 1. that the project shall be buiit as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped March 21, �013, sheets T.O, SP.2, A.8 and A.9 (Rear Elevation - North); and date stamped June 18, 2010, sheets SP.1, SP.3 through A.9 (Building Section) and Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or ps+ch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission -�eview (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the cond�tions of the Chief Building OfficiaPs March 26, 2013, April 23, 2010 and February 5, 2009 memos, the City Engineer's May 1, 2010 and December 15, 2008 memos, the Parks Supervisor's April 30, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's April 26, 2010 and November 24, 2008 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's April 26, 2010 and November 21, 2008 memos shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur untii a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to compiy with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall compiy with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires afFected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit. 2600 Summit Drive EfFective April 18, 2013 10. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FULLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED W EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roor ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. �ITY OF BURLINGAME COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �y� � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696-3790 �?i , �:� www.burlingame.org Site: 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE The City of Burlingome Planning Commission announces the fallowing public hearing on MONDAY, APRIL 8, 2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Holl Council Chamhers, 501 Primrose Rond, Burlingame, CA: Applicotion for Ar�endment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for changes to a previously approved first and second story addition to an existing single tamily dwelling, and a new deck area off the rear of the hause at 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE zoned R-l. APN 021-211-110 Mailed: March 29, 2013 F` (Please refer to other side) : t • :'i �1�,� O� �ldi"�1i7�lile A copy of the applicaiion and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be lirnited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in writien correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible ior informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you.. William Meeker Community Development Director = . � (Please refer to other side)