The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2600 Summit Drive - Staff Report (3)l� ". �� i . ;�., �, :rf}� �. , _ -. , , _ City of Burlingame Item No. 7 Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit Regular Action Address: 2600 Summit Drive Meeting Date: May 13, 2013 Request: Application for Amendment to Design Review anc� Hillside Area Construction Permit for changes to a previously approved first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling, including a new deck area off the rear of the house. Applicant and Designer: Jesse Geurse, Geurse Conc.eptual Design Inc. Property Owner; John Gumas General Plan: Low Density Residential AP N : 027-014-100 Lot Area: 82,342 SF Zoning: R-1 �nvironmental R�view Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmeotal Quality Act (CEQA), per Article 19 Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF provided all public services and facilities are available and that the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. Project Background: An application for Design Review, Hillside,4rea Construction Permit and Special Permits for height and attached garage for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2010 (June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permitwas issued on May 30, 2012, and construction is now underway. On September 10, 2012, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved an FYI for 2600 Summit Drive, that included removing all grids from the windows and doors at the rear elevation and on the windows and doors towards the rear of the left elevation and to change the size of the glass doors at the rear of the house (September 10, 2012, FYI memo attached). On November 13, 2012, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved a second FYI for 2600 Summit Drive. That FYI approval included: adding an uncovered balcony ofFthe second floor Master bedroom towards the rear corner of the house, which included replacing some windows with French doors, and which enlarged the approved lot coverage and floor area ratio by 70.1 SF (6,586 SF, 0.08 FAR proposed); removing a windowfrom the garage along the front elevation; reducing the size of several windows along each elevation; and removing the shed roof extension from the turret off the formal dining room (November 13, 2012, FYI memo attached). Proposed Revisions: The applicant is now requesting an Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for a new proposed deck addition off the rear of the house that will be greater than 30" above adjacent grade and will therefore count towards the proposed setback and lot coverage calculations. The portions of the proposed deck addition that will exceed 30" from adjacent grade will be set back a minimum of 15'-4" from the rear property line and will add 484 SF to the overall lot coverage on the property (6.3°/o lot coverage proposed, where 5.8% lot coverage was originally approved). The overall height ofthe proposed deck addition will range from at grade to over 10' above adjacent grade in certain locations due to the slope on the lot. Please refer to the attached letter and revised plans submitted by the applicant, dated May 1, 2013, for an explanation of the proposed new deck addition. Summary (based on plans submitted May 1, 2013): This large and oddly-shaped lot is located at the corner of Summit Drive and Belvedere Court in the Hillside Area. The narrow portion of the lot, along Summit Drive, is considered to be the lot front. The applicant is proposing a first and second story addition to the existing two-story, 3,997 square foot single- family dwelling. On the first floor, the applicant is proposing to reconfigure the interior and add a formal dining room, entry hall and turret, and new garage to the front of the structure. On the second floor, the applicant is proposing to add a hallway, master bath and closets, and an additional bedroom. With the proposed addition, the floor area will increase to 6,516 SF (0.08 FAR) where the zoning code allows a maximum of 8,000 SF (0.10 Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Consfruction Permit 2600 Summit Drive FAR). The proposed project is 1,484 SF below the maximum allowable floor area. The proposed structure will be 33'-4" above the average top of curb, which requires a Special Permit. With this project, there is no increase to the number of potential bedrooms proposed (five existing). Three parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required on site. Two covered parking spaces (20' x 20' clear interior dimensions) will be provided in the new attached garage, and the required uncovered parking space (9' x 20') will be provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant was approved for the following applications on June 28, 2010: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010, a, 5); ■ Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.61.020); ■ Special Permit for an attached garage (C.S. 25.26.035, a); and ■ Special Permit for building height between 30' and 36' (33'-4" proposed) (C.S. 25.26.060, a, 1). 2600 Summit Drive Lot Size: 82,342 SF Plans date stam ed: Ma 1, 2013 and June 18, 2010 ; PREVIOUS APPROVAL REVISED PROPOSAL : ALLOWED/ (06/18/10 plans) (03/21/13 plans) REQUIRED SETBACKS � Front (1st flr): ; 131' (to formal DR) no change 15'-0" (2nd flr): ; 143' (to turret) no change � 20'-0" Side (left): : 7'-0" (to garage) no change 7'-0" (right): ; 40'-0" no change 7'-6" Rear (1st flr): ; 56'-5" (to FR/dining) 15'-4" (to deck) 15'-0" (2nd flr): ; 53'-4" (to MB) no change 20'-0" Lot Coverage: 4,755 SF 5,239 SF 32,937 SF 5.8% 6.3% 40% FAR: ; 6,516 SF no change 8,000 SF' 0.08 FAR 0.10 FAR # of bedrooms: ; 5 no change --- Parking: ; 2 covered 2 covered (20' x 20') no change (20' x 20') 1 uncovered 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') - -- --------------- -- -- —_ __.------ Height: : 33'-4" 2 no change 30'-0" DH Enve/ope: ; complies no change CS 25.28.075 ' The maximum single-family residential house size shall be 8,000 gross square feet, including accessory structures (CS 25.26.070 e). Z Special Permit for a structure between 30' and 36' as measured from average top of curb (33'-4" proposed) (CS 25.26.060 a, 1) was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2010. Staff Comments: Planning stafF would note that because of the size and location of the proposed new deck addition, it was determined that the project would be brought forward to the Planning Commission as a study � Amendment fo Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit 2600 Summit Drive item and not directly as a RegularAction Item. See attached memo from the Chief Building Official dated March 25, 2013 and original project memos from the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, Parks Supervisor, Fire Marshal and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Study Meeting: At the Planning Commission Design Review Study meeting on April 8, 2013, the Commission had several questions and comments regarding notes on the plans, the placement of the deck with respect to the adjacent downhill property and the need for some so�t of story poles. It voted to place the item on the Regular Action Calendar when the plans have been revised as directed and story poles have been installed (April 8, 2013, Planning Commission Minutes). The applicant submitted photographs that show the story poles that were installed to outline the proposed new deck addition on April 30, 2013 and revised plans and a response let�er on May 1, 2013, to address the Planning Commission's questions and comments. The revised plans show th� location of the fo�tprint of the adjacent house at 3 Belvedere Court in comparison to the placement of the proposed new deck addition. Please referto the copy of the April 8, 2013, Planning Commission minutes included in the staff report for the list of Planning Commission questions and comments. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; 4. InterFace of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a Hillside Area Construction Permit by the Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction ofthe existing distantviews of nearby properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060). Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped May 1, 2013, sheets T.O, SP.2, A.8 and A.9 (Rear Elevation - North); and date stamped June 18, 2010, sheets SP.1, SP.3 through A.9 (Building Section) and Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall �e subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's March 26, 2013, April 23, 2010 and February 5, 2009 memos, the City Engineer's May 1, 2010 and December 15, 2008 memos, the Parks Supervisor's April 3 Arnendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit 2600 Summit Drive 30, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's April 26, 2010 and November 24, 2008 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's April 26, 2010 and November 21, 2008 memos shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition �r removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth_moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued an�-such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulaticns of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance wi�h all conditions of approval is required; the condifions of approvai shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the porti�ns of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 1 i3. that the project shail meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 1'B. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12,. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff wiil inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erica �trohmeier Associate Planner c. Jesse Geurse, 405 Bayswater Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010, applicant and designer n Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit 2600 Summit Drive Attachments: Applicant's response to Planning Commissions Comments, date stamped May 1, 2013 Photographs of installed story poles, submitted by appiicant on April 30, 2013 Minutes from the April 8, 2013 Planning Commission Design Review Study Meeting Diagram of properties, submitted by neighbor at Design Review Study meeting on April 8, 2013 Application to the Planning Gommission _ _ _ _ _ _ Applicant's Explanation Letter, date stamped March 21, 2013 Chief Building Offici�i comments, dated March 26, 2013 Copy of FYI memo from November 13, 2012 Planning Commission Meeting Applicant's letter of explanation for FYI #2, date stamped October 23, 2012 Copy of FYI memo from September 10, 2012 Planning Commission Meeting Applicant's letter of explan�tion for FYI #1, date stamped August 24, 2012 Minutes from the June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Regular Action Meeting Staff Comments (from previously approved project) Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed May 3, 2013 Aerial Photo 5 Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, California 94010 May l, 2013 City of Burlingame attn: Erica Strohmeier , Planner 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 re: Response to Planning Commission's recommendations per meeting minutes on April 8, 2013 Planning Commission Meeting Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Planning Commission, We thank you for your concerns and suggestions made with regard to our application for design review for the proposed rear deck extension to the residence located at 2600 Summit Drive. We too, are architecturally sensitive and very eager to address your concerns. We had revised the plans in accordance to your recommendations. We hope that you fmd the revised project acceptable for approval. Please see below for response to changes. In response to your particular recommendations: 1•"Impacts will be illustrated by story poles. " a) Response: Deck story poles have been installed for visual impact. 2• `Neighbor concern about deck" a) Response: Deck story poles have been installed and a call has been made to Anne Mahnken for a site visit. Mr. John Gumas had also demonstrated to Anne that the deck would not be visible due to vegetation and trees. We had also placed a call to lower neighbor that would be most impacted by deck extension. 3• "Plotting of lower neighbor residence on plans" a) Response: Location of lower neighbor below the Gumas residence has been located on site plan to demonstrate location of house in accordance to proposed deck. We had also shown the location of the house on exterior elevation and section. Thank you for this opportunity to further consider our proposed addition. Should you have additional questj,6n� or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at 650-703-6197 Since: Jesse Princi �� ;��" �-- � Z013 �lTy pF 6URLif�GA�E t LiD-F'�F,��1i�I1�l� DI\(. 2600 Summit Drive — Phot�graphs of installed story poles (April 30, 2013) 2600 Summit Drive — Photographs of installed story poles (April 30, 2013) CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes April 8, 2013 . IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS , 8. 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR CHANGES TO A PR.EVIOUSLY APPROVED FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, AND A NEW DECK AREA -0FF -THE—REAR OF THE- HOUSE (JESSE GEURSE, GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; JOHN GUMAS, PROPERTY OWNER) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated April 8. 2013, with attaehments. Associate Planner Strohmeier, briefly presented the project description. Questions of staff: ■ none ' Chair Gaul opened the public comment period. Jesse Geurse, Burlingame, represented the applicant: ■ The purpose of the deck is not only to gather more space off the pool, but also replace existing guardrails that are deteriorating at the back of the residence. ■ We've designed the deck extension that curves away from the adjacent neighbor down below. ■ Reason for the design orientation of the deck is a public utility easement, so our area for expanding the existing pool deck is very limited. Designed for minimal impact on the neighbor down below. Questions of applicant: ■ It says it's 30 feet above natural grade on the site plan, but then on the section and elevation it doesn't look like it's anything close to that. (Geurse: No, it should be 30 inches.) ■ Does the deck step down? (Geurse: Yes, it steps down 18 inches lower.) ■ Can you clarify the trees? It looks like there are some oak trees on the survey. (Geurse: The survey is a different orientation than the site plan. The survey is on the site plan. The other vegetation below deck is vast area of trees, brushes.) ■ Does the shaded area on the plans indicate the area of new deck? (Geurse: All the shaded area is new deck. It distinguishes the area that would be 30 inches above grade and outward. There is a dashed/hidden line, and beyond that would be anything above 30 inches over natural grade.) ■ In the proposed revision it says there will be added 484 square feet to the overall lot coverage, but the deck shows 1,305 square feet. The difference is the area that is not 30 inches above grade? (Geurse: yes) Commission comments: ■ Curious how this is going to impact the property below, because I know there was some discussion when they were doing an addition as well. Would it be possible to see the footprint or a portion of the adjacent house on the site plan so we can get a better idea of how these two interFace? (Strohmeier: Yes, we have plans for that house that you can use for that purpose.) ■ Looks like house next door has a deck that extends out pretty far too, as a plane of reference. (Guerse: We could show that also. The idea of curving the deck was to get the majority of that deck to sway away, and also the view overlooking the city.) 19 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes Apri18, 2013 Public comments: Anne Menken, Burlingame, spoke regarding this item: ■ Concerned project might block view. They are above, we are down low. We look out on a view of a hill. ---- ■--Can't read plan, can't tell where it is �roing. (Submitted exhibit to the Commission). Diagonal lines show the views. Additional Commission comments: ■ It seems like something tha�would be very easy to stake out. Story poles would not need to be very high because it's not a roof ridge that is being defined: ■ A story pole could show a height of a rail, and potentially where someone could be standing. ■ (Strohmeier: For a railing in a hillside area you have requested story poles.) ■ Would it be possible to visit the property and get a sense of what they are doing? ■ The contractor could spray a board and put it where the deck would be to give the neighbor a sense of whether she would be able to see it. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: ■ If we request story poles do they need to be surveyed? (Strohmeier: Only if you request that) Chair Gaul re-opened the public comment period. ■ Is there a way to explain to the neighbor what the impacts might be? (Geurse: Yes, can place some 4 x 4s, stakes in a perimeter measured. Could have it surveyed so we know exactly where to show the arch and throw in some stakes, paint them orange, 10 feet on center. " ■ It does not have to be certified by a surveyor. Go for the most extreme points. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: ■ Don't understand what the big deal is with the story poles, if they're not surveyed. With the story poles it's black and white. It's not that big a deal to do. ■ Looking to save them some money and time and keep the project moving. ■ Wants to make sure the neighbor is able to see it clearly. ■ Either way this is going to be coming back to us. This is a design review study. ■ There will be another hearing, so if there is an issue then we can call for story poles. ■ We can do site visits ourselves. ■ The neighbor came not saying that there would be a view blockage, but saying that she did not know what the view impact would be. In that case it's just a clarification, and then if there is an issue we can take it to the next step. Commissioner Gaul made a motion to place the item on the RegularAction Calendar when complete. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Bandrapalli. Discussion of motion: 20 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION - Approved Minutes April 8, 2013 None. Chair Gaul ca//ed for a vote on the motion to place this item on the REGULAR ACTION CALENDAR when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-1-0 (Commissioner Terrones _ - absent). The Planning-Commission's actron is advisory and not appealable,- This item conduded at 9:27 p. m. 21 �� $ F�� ---� � � -�F= _� � To see all the defails that are visible an the screen, use the "Print" link next to the map. � � 6 � � � �i r`� � �;� 3y��e �, \ \\ \\ � ( �1G \ �,� G;� --:.. - ,. . ;� Submitted by neighbor at --- �-__________.__-----------_ ..-- _ ---.--______ Design Review Study Meeting April 8, 2013 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMEN'f 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 ��,��+E APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �� ,r Type of application: Design Review � Conditional Use Permit Variance — �pecial Permit Other - ParceE Numberc -- — Project address: 2600 SUMMIT DRIVF BURLINGAME, CA. �J4010 APPLICANT �: Name: GEURSE CONCEPTU.�L DESIGN, INC. Address: �05BAYSWATERAVENLJE City/State/Zip: BURLINGAME, CA 940I0 Phone (wl: 650.703.6197 (��; 650.343.3093 � fl: G50.558.9324 ARCHTTECT/DESIGNER GEURSE CONCEPT[JAL DESIGN, INC. Address: `�05BAYSWATFI2AVENLIE City/State/Zip: B��GAME, CA 9�10 Phone (w): �50.703.G197 th�. G5a343.3093 � fl; �50.558.9324 �r-ti- under penalty af perjury that the information of m�nowledge and belief. r ! PROJECT DESCRIPTION: �W DECK EXTENSION AT EXISTING POOL DECKIIIG. A.FFADAVTT/SIGNATURE: I given herein is true and correct� Applicant's signature: r I know about the proposed pplic application to the Plannin Co� Property owner's signatur .� PR�PERTY OWNER Name: JOHN GUMAS Address: 2G00 StJMMITDRIVE GiTy/StatelZip: BLJRLINGAME,CA9�1010 Phone (w): 415�621�7575 (h)�. �fl� Please indicate with an asterisK * the contact person for this project. � Date: 3/26/13 authorize the above applicant to submit this 3/2G/13 PCAPP.FRM Geurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, Califomia 94010 March 20, 2013 City of Burlingame Attn: Erica Strohmeier, Zoning Technician 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: Admenment to design review for new deck extension to the residence located at 2600 Su.minit Road for platuung and planning commission review and approval. Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Planning / Planning Commission, Please find enclosed a proposed new deck extension as an amendment to design review for the above mentioned project that is still under construction. We are looking for approval for the deck extension for the reason that we will be landscaping and hardscaping the rear yard area and around the pool. The pool deck and coping are slated to be re- hardscaped in lightweight stone pa�ers. In designing we would like to eXtend the rear pool deck outward for larger surface area for the enjoyment of the pool surrounding. The deck would also be surfaced with lightweight stone pavers to match the new pool hardscape. We asked the conmlissioners to please review and approve the added deck extension. Thank you for your atfention regarding this project. Should you have additional questions or concerns, p e do not hesitate to contact us at 650.703.6197 Sincerely, Jesse Geur e I� � - Principal � F = r `- �r`i.�� Y x _ l:i�Yr-_ - -�'�Pf _ - _ :,ri�4rr- __' • _r�.l'=._`:!'',_ ..�.�_ �,� �_� .,�_�,�n� ..�.� �,�..��..,,� ,,.. _. �,.�.� �,-.�..., � �, �..�.x� � � Project Comments Date: - To.__ From: March 25, 2013 � Engineering Division __ -- _.._ (650) 558-7230 X Building Division (650) 558-7260 0 Parks Division (650) 558-7334 0 Fire Division --_ . _ _--- ___ __ _ __ (650) 558-7600 � Stormwater Division (650) 342-3727 � City Attorney (650) 558-72�4 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review Amendment and Hiliside Area Construction Permit for changes to an approved first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling, including a new deck area off the rear of the house at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-110 Staff Review: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) On the plans specify that this project wiil comply with the 2010 California Building Code, 2010 California Residential Code (where applicable), 2010 California Mechanical Code, 2010 California Electrical Code, and 2010 California Plumbing Code, including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1856-2010. Note: If the Planning Commission has approved the project prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 31, 2010 then the building permit application for that project may use the provisions found in the 2007 California Building Codes including all amendments as adopted in Ordinance 1813. Place the following information on the first page of the plans: "Construction Hours" Weekdays: 7:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. Saturdays: 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays: 10:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (See City of Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 13.04.100 for details.) On the first page of the plans specify the following: "Any hidden conditions that require work to be performed beyond the scope of the building permit issued for these plans may require further City approvals including review by the Planning Commission." The building owner, project designer, and/or contractor must submit a Revision to the City for any work not graphically illustrated on the Job Copy of the plans prior to performing the work. Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. Provide fully dimensioned plans. 6) Provide a fully dimensioned site plan which shows the true property boundaries, the location of all structures on the property, existing driveways, and on-site parking. 7) Indicate on the plans that a Grading Permit, if required, will be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 8) Proyide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings_more than 30" in height at _ __ - _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ any point are considered in cd�culating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 9) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 10)Provide lighting at all exterior landings 11)Provide complete details on the plars that show compliance with the swimming pool barrier requirements. 2010 CBC §3109 3-26-2013 CITY OF BURLINGAME �,�� Community Development Department `;'�: MEMORANDUM DATE: November 6, 2012 TO FROM Planning Commission Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner Director's Report Meeting Date: November 13, 2012 SUBJECT: FYI — REQUESTED 6HANGES TO A PREVIDUSLY APPROV�D DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT AT 2&00 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An application for Design Review, Hiliside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits for height and attached garage for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2010 (June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). On September 10, 2012, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved an FYI for 2600 Summit Drive, that included removing all grids from the windows and doors at the rear elevation and on the windows and doors towards the rear of the left elevation and to change the size of the glass doors at the rear of the house (September 10, 2012, FYI memo attached). A building permit was issued on May 30, 2012 and the project is currently under construction. in a letter dated October 17, 2012, the project designer is requesting an FYI to: add an uncovered balcony ofF the second floor Master bedroom towards the rear corner of the house, which includes replacing some windows with French doors, and which will enlarge the approved lot coverage and floor area ratio by 70.1 SF (6,586 SF, 0.08 FAR proposed); remove a window from the garage along the front elevation; reduce the size of several windows along each elevation; and remove the shed roof extension from the turret ofF the formal dining room. The designer submitted a letter and originally approved and proposed building elevation drawings, date stamped October 23, 2012, to ezplain the proposed changes to the previously approved design review project. Other than the proposed revisions listed above and detailed in the designers letter date stamped October 23, 2012, there are no other changes proposed to the design of the house. Planning staff would note that because of the minor revisions proposed to the house, it was determined that the project couid be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner c. Jesse Geurse, 405 Bayswater Avenue, Burlingame, CA 94010, designer. ATTACHMENTS: � Explanation letter from designer, date stainped October 23, 2012 Previous FYI memo from September 10, Planning Commission Meeting Previous explanation letterfor changes, date stamped August 24, 2012 June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Regular Action Minutes Proposed Second Level Floor Plan and originally approved and proposed stamped October 23, 2012 Building Elevations, date �eurse Conceptual Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, California 94010 - 0 October 17, 2012 __ _ _ _ ___ __ _ _ __ City of Burlingame Attn: Erica Strohmeier, Zoning Technician 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 9401-0 re: FYI-2 for rear elevation window revision �-�d minor alterations to the residence located at 2600 Stuninit Road for nlaiuiiug and planning commission review and approval. Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Pla.nni.ng / Planuing Commission, ,� Mr and Mrs. Gumas had requested some additional alteration to the residence due interior issues and minor modifications to exterior due to previously approved FYI-1 We had made all revisions in attached 11"xl7" FYI-1 plans and explain the changes as follows: 1) REQUEST APPROVAL TO REMOVE WINDOW AND REPLACE WITH FRENCH DOOR FORACCESS TO NEW BALCONY FOR BAY VIEVJ FROM MASTER BEDROONL 2) REQUEST APPROVAL TO REMOVE FRENCH DOORS AND BALCONY DUE TO FIIRNITURE PLACEMENT t1ND REPLACE WITH WINDOWS 3) REQLTESTAPPROVAL REDUCED SIZE OF WINDOW IN CL03ETDUE TO CLOSET DESIGN. 4) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF GRIDS DUE TO BAY VIEW. WINDOWS NOT VISIBLE FROM FRONT OF RESIDENCE. 5) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REDUCTION OF WINDOW HEIGHT IN BATHROOM DUE TO PRIVACY AND ADJACENT NEIGHBORS PRIVACY. 6) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF W?NDOW lN GARl�GE DUE TO FUTTJRE SHELVING ON INTERIOR 7) . REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF SE�ED ROOF EXTENSION AT TT_IRRET TO SIMPLIFY THE DESIGN. 8) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF WINDOWS EACH SIDE DUE TO 1NT`ERIOR KICTHEN CABINET CONFLICT 9) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF TRANSOMS FOR FULL FF�IIGHT CLEAR WINDOWS FOR BAY VIEW DUE TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FYI-1 - GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS OCTOBER 17, 2012 10) :tEQUEST APPROVAL F02 REDUCE HEIGHT OF WINDOW DUE TO FLJRNI'I'URE PLACEMENT IN MASTER BEDROOM LOUNGE. Thank you for your attention regarding this project. Should you have additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at 650.703.6197 Sincerely, Jesse Geurse Principal 2 , CITY OF BURL[NGAME �,R�.�r��aM� Community Development Department '�`� � MEMORANDUM DATE: September 4, 2012 TO: FROM Planning Commission Erica Strohmeier, Associate Planner Director's Report Meeting Date: September 10, 2012 SUBJECT: FYI — REQUES�'ED CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DESIGh- REVIEW PROJECT AT 2600 SUMMITDRIVE, ZONED R-1. Summary: An appiication for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits for height and attached garage for first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2010 (June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes attached). A building permit was issued on May 30, 2012 and t�e �roject is currentiy under construction. In a letter dated August 24, 2012, the pr.ojeci architect is requesting an FYI to remove all grids from the windows and doors at the rear elevafion and on the.windows and doors towards the rear of the left elevation and to change the size of the glass doors at the rear of the house. The designer submitted a letter and originally approved and proposed rear and left side elevation drawings, date stamped August 24, 2012, to explain the proposed changes to the previously approved design review project. Other than the praposed revisions listed above and detailed in the designers letter dated August 24, 2012, there are no other changes proposed to the design of fhe house. Planning staff would note that because of the minor revision to the windows af the rear and left side of the house, it was determined that the project could be reviewed by the Commission as an FYI item. If the Commission feels there is a need for more study, this item may be placed on an action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant. Erica S�rohmeier, Associate Planner c. Randy Grange, TRG Architects, 205 Park Road # 203, Burlingame, CA 94010, architect. ATTACHMENTS: Explanation letter from designer, date stamped August 24, 2012 June 28, 2010, Planning Commission Regular Action Minutes Originally approved and propased rear and left side Building Elevations, date stamped August 24, 2012 Geurse Conceptua-1 Designs, Inc. 405 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, California 94010 August 22, 2012 _.__ _ ___ _ _---- _ _ City of Burlingame ' attn: Erica Strohmeier, Zoning Technician 501 Primrose Road Buriingame, CA 94010 re: FYI-1 for rear elevation window revision to the residence located at 2600 �w�unit Road for plamung and plau�.ng commission review and approval. Dear Members of the City of Burlingame Pla.nning / Planning Commission, Mr and Mrs. Gumas had requested a minar alteration t� t�e residence due to the beautiful 180 plus view of the Bay, Ciiy of San Francisco and San Jose. We had demolished the residence and cleaned the site and what we saw was a georgeous view. Due to this view we would like to change the rear elevation windows and doors "ONLY" We had made all revisions in aitached 11"xl7" FYI-1 plans and explain the changes as follows: 1) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR TI� REMOVAL OF GRIDS DUE TO SPECTACULAR VIEWS. GRIDS REMOVED DUE TO VISUAL OBSTRUCTION. TYPICAL ONLY AT REAR OF RESII?ENCE. 2) REQUEST APPROVAL FOR Tf� REMOVAL OF GRIDS AND INCREASED DOOR SIZE 1N WIDTF3. Thank you for your attention regarding this project. Should you have additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at 650.703.6197 Sincerely, Jesse Gei Priucipal �T � �'; � G _. ; ;-.. � �_ . . �.k � Y` l. = ni.;: ;.: i�k.-.. : e�— vL��-r! 1:\.' li` _ ;r,^ .'��S`.`� ,_ .. C/TY QF BUl�LINGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes June 28, 2010 2. 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILL3�DE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR ATTACHED GARA,-GE AND BUILDING HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (JESSE GEURSE .CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, INC., APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND JOHN AND JANICE GUMAS, PROPERTY OWNERSI STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER -__ ---- _ __ — _ _. Reference staff report dated June 28; 2010; with attachments. Community Development Director �Jleeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. T-hirteen (13) conditions were suggested for consideration. Noted lefters received from John Gumas, 2600 Summit Drive, and Chr�s Ngai and Yolanda Leung, 2606 Summit Drive indicating that a compromise has been reached regarding the project design. Chair Terrones �pened the public hearing. Jesse Geurse, 40.5 Bayswater Avenue represented the appiicant: Have redesigned the project ±o the satisfaction of the neighbors at 2606 Summit Drive. Commission comments: ■ Have done a wonderful job on the redesign of the structure; will be a nice look��g �tructure. ■ Requested clarification of the window style. (Geurse—will be aluminum-clad exterior, wood interior.) ■ Giad that the neighbors have come to a resolution regarding the trees. ■ The view issue was the primary concern of the Planning Commission; modifications to the design have substantially reduced any view impacts. Public comments: Chris Ngai and Yolanda Leung, 2606 Summit Drive; John Gumas, 2600 Summit Drive; spoke: ■ Agree that the view blockage has been'minimized. ■ Have also received permission from the property owner to trim trees in order to preserve views to the Bay. ■ Happy with the Commission's desire to have prob(ems resolved between the neighbors. There were no further comments and the pub[ic hearing was closed. Additional Commission comments: ■ Glad an agreement has been reached between the neighbors, but doesn't like to see the project held hostage to achieve a desired end. Commissioner Cauchi moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped June 18, 2010, sheets T.0 through A.9 and Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materiafs, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 5 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes June 28, 2090 3. thrat any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shail require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's April 23, 2010 and February 5, 2009 memos, the City Engineer's May 1, 2010 and December 15, 2008 memos, the Parks Supervisor's April 30, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's April 26, 2010 and November 24, 2008 memos, and the NPDES Coo�dinator's April 26i 2010 and November 21, 2008 memos sfiall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shaii be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth movina. o�r the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a buifding permit for constructicn of the project, the .project const�uction plans shali be modified to include a cover sheet listing ail conditions of approval adopted by the P(anring Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without fhe approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that a(I air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 10. that the project shafl meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 11. that prior to schedufing the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved pians; architectura( certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certificatian of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. 6 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANN/NG COMM/SSIDN — Approved Minutes June 28, 2090 The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yie. Discussion of motion: ■ Regardless of what the neighbors eventually agreed to; the project is now approvable whetherornot the neighbors approved of it. Chair Terrar�es called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-D-7 (Commissioner Vistica absent). Appeai procedures were advrsed. This item concluded at 7:37 p.m. 7 Project Comments Date: To: _.__. _- -_ From: April 22, 2010 �(_ City Engineer ____ (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 Planning Staff _ __ ___ _, ❑ Recycling Specialist ___ _. __ (650) 558-7273 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 G NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for an attached garage for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-110 Staff Review: N/A All previous comments stifl apply. Reviewed by: V V Date: 5/01/2010 Project Comments Date:. _ To:-...._ _ _ From November 17, 2008 -r9(- City Engineer_ --- ---- (650) 558-7230 ❑ Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ City Arborist (650) 558-7254 Planning Staff _. __-- ❑_Recycling Specialist ___.___ (650) 558-7271 ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 G� NPDES Coordinator ; 650) 342-3727 ❑ City Attorney Subject: Request for Design Review, Hilisi.de Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for an attached garage for a first and second story addition to an existing single farriily dweliing at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-110 Staff Review: November 24, 2008 1. Storm drainage shall be designed to drain towards the street frontage or to the City storm drain system. 2. The project shall, at its own cost, design �nd construct frontage public improvements including curb, gutter, side�r�alk, driveway and other necessary appurtenant work. 3. Sewer backwater protection certification is required. Contact Public Works — Engineering Division at (650) 558-7230 for additional information. Reviewed by: V V Date: 12/15/2008 �� Projecf Comments Date: April 22, 2010 d City Engineer (650) 558-7230 - __ ❑ Recyciing Specialist (650J 558-7273 To: X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 ❑ Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 ❑ City Attorney From: ❑ Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 ❑ NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for an attached garage for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-110 Staff Review: N/A 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). Per the City of Burlingame's adopted Resolution, applications received after January 1, 2009 must complete a"GreenPoint Rated Checklist". The GreenPoint Rated Checklist, and other information regarding the City's Green Building requirements, can be found on the City website at the following URL: http�//www burlinqame.org/Index.aspx?paqe=1219 or Contact Joe McCluskey at 650-558-7273. Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. Provide fully dimensioned plans. Provid'e existing and proposed elevations. Indicate on the plans that all work shail be conducted within the limits of the City's Noise Ordinance. See City of Burlinqame Ordinance Municipaf Code, Section 13.04.100 for details. This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, aiterations or repairs within any twelv�-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structure, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildcngs or structures." This building must comply with the 2007 California Building Code for new structures. 8) Due to ihe extensive nature of this canstruction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy Qf the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 9) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be _ _-- --- _ _ _ _ _ demolished, new walls, ard a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit wi not be issue� until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 10)Specify on the plans that this project will comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Note: All projects for which a building permit a.�plication is received on or after January 1, 2010 must comply with the 2008 California Energy Efficiency Standards. Go to http•/lwww enerqy ca qov/titfe24/20�8standards/ for publications and details. 11)Show the distances from all exterior walls to properfi� lines or to assumed property lines 12)Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 13)Rooms that can �e used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings. Note: The area labeled "- Lounge" is a room that can be used for sleeping purposes and, as such, must comply with this requirement. 14)Provide guardrails at all landings. NOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 15)Provide handrails at all stairs where there are four or more risers. 16)Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 17)The fireplace chimney must terminate at least two feet higher than any portion of the building within ten feet. Sec. 2113.9 Reviewed by: , �J Date: �/�:3�� v� �s Project Comments Date: To• From � City Attorney November 17, 2008 � City-Engineer- ___ (650) 558-7230 X Chief Building Official (650) 558-7260 � City Arborist (650) 558-7254 � Recycling Specialist_ ._ __.__ (650) 558-7271 � Fire Marshal (650) 558-7600 Q NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for an attached garage for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-110 Staff Review: November 24, 2008 1) On the plans specify that this project will comply with the 2007 California Building Codes (CBC). 2) Anyone who is doing business in the City must have a current City of Burlingame business license. 3) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 4) Provide existing and proposed elevations. 5) This project will be considered a New Building because, according to the City of Burlingame Municipal code, "when additions, alterations or repairs within any tv✓elve-month period exceed fifty percent of the current replacement value of an existing building or structur�, as determined by the building official, such building or structure shall be made in its entirety to conform with the requirements for new buildings or structures." This buildi�g must comply with the 2007 California Building Code for new structures. 6) Due to the extensive nature of this construction project the Certificate of Occupancy will be rescinded once construction begins. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued after the project has been finaled. No occupancy of the building is to occur until a new Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 7) Show the distances from all exterior walls to property lines or to assumed property lines 8) Show the dimensions to adjacent structures. 9) Provide a complete demolition plan that indicates the existing walls, walls to be demolished, new walls, and a legend. NOTE: The Demolition Permit will not be issued until a Building Permit is issued for the project. 10) Comply with the 2005 California Energy Efficiency Standards for low-rise residential / non- residential buildings. Go to http://www.enerqy.ca.qov/title24 for publications and details. 11) Rooms that can be used for sleeping purposes must have at least one window or door that complies with the egress requirements. Specify the size and location of all required egress windows on the elevation drawings ,12) Provide guardrails at all landings. fdOTE: All landings more than 30" in height at any point are considered in calculating the allowable lot coverage. Consult the Planning Department for details if your project entails landings more than 30" in height. 13) Provide handrails at ali stairs where there are four or more risers. 14) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 15) The freplace chirnneys must terminate at least two feet higher han any portion of the building ___— ___�cthin ten feei. Sec. 211 . _ ___ _ __ . . . _ _ _ - _ __ __ - --- ___ _._ %: Reviewed by: %/ Date: � � � Project Comments Date: April 22, 2010 To: __ -_ __ _ �_ City Engir,eer- -- _ (650) 558-7230 ~ Chief Building Official (650j 5�8-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 - --- -- �-Recyciing Specialist- (650) 558-7273 ~ Fire Marshal _(650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 ~ City Attorney From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for an attached garage for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-110 Staff Review: N/A 1. No tree 48" or �ver may be removed without permit from Parks Division (559- 7330). 2. if construction is within drip line of existing trees, a Tree Protection Plan must be in place to protect trees during all phases of construction. Reviewed by: B Disco Date: 4/30/10 URBAN FOREST MAIYACEME/VT PLAN � E�BS�:M�i TFC.EF TO 'REkIR!!l. ,. _._.�_.__ .,..... 1'€it�7ECi�YE FE�P_�6 �� . PRt7TEGTi`�E FEH�i�� Sd3�LL B€ �GiiT D�,i�i�E Pt7t`fFRdF'YL€d�E fE7:CEhl�;. z. �4TH9NG IN��l6 3t4€ pR3�iJ1�E kRE�. �°riJ�i,l 6E RAKEII, GUT. 5T£��. �R 43FEEFr5Y3`SE GISi'�RBE�7, 3. C�ii'�TOR �F�.i.k� T� E:t"T�f�i� �7:R� +�HD �i?CiTECT A�J.. m."�, t531N� �{i€�5 T� REW�I�t. �ti3 �E�i�%FiE4 3Y L�DS��PE Pt�S1. =. T#ZEE F'si��N �4{�,LL �€ 9FtSC�1LiE6 Y?i Jw"C�R�`rJ�HCE .�Y9Tf�i PRadECT JvFi$0�335fi �4:ii7 ; - �� TE� � �� E�� g�'� ��R�� Q�° ' -- -- — ---- _ 'fC1 i'F�E fF��EFTIDH G1F ,E�S't` . f�i T� ``s��E ��- Updaied Jv.ly 20, 2009 - 32 - Project Comments Date: ____ - - To• From: April 22, 2010 � City Engineer -- ---- 0 Recycling Specialist- (650) 558-7230 (650) 558-7273 � Chief Building Official (6�0) 558-7260 � Parks Supervisor (650) 558-7334 � Fire Marsh�l (650) 558-7600 � NPDES Coordinator (650) 342-3727 0 City Attorney Planning Staff Subject: Request for Design Review, Hiliside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit for an attached garage for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, APN: 027-271-110 StafF Review: N/A Provide a residential fire sprinkler throughout the residence. 1. Provide a minimum 1 inch water meter. 2. Provide backflow prevention device/double check valve assembly — Schematic of water lateral line after meter shall be shown on Building Plans prior to approval indicating location of the device after the split between domestic and fire protection lines. 3. Drawings submitted to Building Department for review and approval shall clearly indicate Fire Sprinklers shall be installed and shop drawings shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. I�eviewed by: �� Date; 2 � �� RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for __ _Amendment to Desiqn Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for chanqes to a._ previouslv approved first and second story addition to an existinq sinqle familv dwellinq, includinq a new deck area off the rear of the house at 2600 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, John Gumas,_ propertv owner, APN: 027-271-110; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Mav 13, 2013, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and ali other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby f�und that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section: 15301 Class 1(e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt provided the addition will not result in an increase of .more than 10,000 SF provided all public services and facilities are available and that the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. 2. Said Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th dav of Mav, 2013 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Amendment to Design Rev�ew and Hiliside Area Construction Permit. 2600 Summit Drive Effective May 23, 2013 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division __._ date stamped May 1, 2013, sheets T.O, SP.2, A.8 and A.9 (Rear Elevation - Ncrth); and __ _____ date stamped June 18, 2010, sheets SP.1, SP.3 through A.9 (Building Section) and Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or �itch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size garage, which would inciud amendment to this permit; or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or e adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's March 26, 2013, April 23, 2010 and February 5, 2009 memos, the City Engineer's May 1, 2010 and December 15, 2008 memos, the Parks Supervisor's April 30, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's April 26, 2010 and November 24, 2008 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's April 26, 2010 and November 21, 2008 memos shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit. 2600 Summit Drive Effective May 23, 2013 10. that the project shail meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform _,. _ __ Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;_ _. ___ _ THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compiiance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. CITY OF BURLINGAME t COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAR7MENT BUR�IN�AME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � "�-;I,`e" . PH: (650) 558-7250 � FAX: (650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.org Site: 2600 SUMMIT DRI��E The City of Burlingame Plannins- Commission onnounces the following puhlic hearing on MONDRY, MAY 13, 2013 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chombers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingome, CA: Application for Amendment ta Design Review and Hillside Areo Construction Permit far chonges to a previously approved first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling, and a new deck nrea off the reor of the house ot 2600 SUMMIT DRiVE zoned R-l. APN 027-271-110 Mailed: May 3, 2013 (Please refer to other side) �ity of �uriinpame P!l��1� �iE.��ING ��'�� A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Devel�pmeni Departrrrent at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) i� court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. ' For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PID�LIC 1�iEA►�I�lC i�0i10E (Please reier to other side)