Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2600 Summit Drive - ResolutionRECORDING REQUESTED BY: Planning Department City of Burlingame WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 2010-076146 10:22am 07/13/10 Ri Fee: NO FEE Count of pages 21 Recorded in Official Records County of San Mateo Warren Slocum Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder II � I I� I I I� II �I II I I I I I I I I I II I II * 2 0 1 0 0 0 7 6 1 4 6 A R* Resolution No. 38-2010 2600 SUMMIT DRIVE - APN 027-271-110 TITLE OF DOCUMENT � I hereby certify this to be a full, true and correct copy of the document it purports to be, the original of which is on file in my offir,e. Date: RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, DESIGN REVIEW, FiILL�IDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PEF:MIT AND SPECI�4L P�RMITS RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Design Review Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits for heiqht and for attached qaraqe for a first and second story addition to an existinq sinqle family dwellinq at 2600 Summit Drive; zoned R-1, John Gumas, property owner, APN: 027-271-110; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on June 28. 2010, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 Class 1(e)(2) which states that additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF in areas where all public services and facilities are available and the area in which the project is located is not environmentally sensitive. 2. Said Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Design Review, Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. it is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. _ /�.�'`e'� Chai man I, ��17�/�,��- �G� , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a ��yu�G� ,���o+�ny nf+ho plunn�n� ��;,,�„j��inn halri nn tha ��th ria�i nf �litna �Q'IQ hv thP fnllnwinr� vote: �sao su�n�a� D���� - ��so ss-zo� o AYES: f�uran, Ca�chi, Gaul, Linc�sfrosn, 7'er�ones, Yie NOES: l�CiNE A�SENT: Vistica RECUSE: NONE � Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, Hiliside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits. 2600 Summit Drive Effective July 8, 2010 that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted fo the Planning Division date stamped June 18, 2010, sheets T.0 through A.9 and Boundary and Topographic S u rvey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architecturai features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shali require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's April 23, 2010 and February 5, 2009 memos, the City Engineer's May 1, 2010 and December 15, 2008 memos, the Parks Supervisor's April 30, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's April 26, 2010 and November 24, 2008 memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's April 26, 2010 and November 21, 2008 memos shall be met; 5. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 6. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shail not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall nn+ ho rr��ijfjAri nr rhanyari �nrithni�t tha a�nrnval nf th_P_ Planning �ommission; or City Council on appeal; 8. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 9. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling ��u'r2nCo v��hj�h ro�u�jrc� uffa��A�i �icmnlitinn nPw r.nngtnirtj�n �nc� aliFr��l�n oC4J�C�S to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recyciing requiremen4s; any pariiai �r iuil demclit��r� of a str�cture, interier er exterier, sha!! require � demoliti�n rermif; 10, th�t the arpject shall meet all the req,uirements of the California Building and Uniform EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption, Design Review, Hiliside Area Construction Permit and Special Permits. 2600 Summit Drive Effective July 8, 2010 Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans.