HomeMy WebLinkAbout383-399 Beach Road - Approval Letteri _-
�'
- 2 -
`� � ...� 3���/ 7�. .
' 1. TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAPS, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 11
� AND 12� P,^.dZA AIRPORT PARK UNIT NO. 2(RSM VC•L. F)5�28) AT 38�
I BEACH ROAD, ZONED M-1, BY H. G. HICKEY FOR ANZA PACIFIC CORP.
j (LESSEE) AND LAWRENCE CRIVELLI (PROPERTY UWNER.)
Chairman Sine introduced this application for hearing. Staff report
by City Engineer pointed out that this is a division of one lot
into two parcels "D" and "E" and the creation of another Parcel "C".
��ne lot line is thc centerline of a 6" w�.' � oi a*� existing '�u.ilding
and this must be a common wall., The City Engineer indicated he
wished a d2signation to show on the final map �f this corrunon wall
• property_line. There is a designation on the t�ntative map but
none or. tne final. He noted tr� t:�ntative map sh�ws the fire
system for the building with the two parcels separately valved and
�he valves accessible from outside. He state� it does see:� that
the sprinkler system can be operated individually. He requested
that the�existing prcperty line on Parcel C that is being eliminated
be designated on the final map as abandoned. Also the applicant is
designatin�. the 20' e�semen� for channel maintenance along the west
property line of ?arcel C bu� it is not clearly designated as to
u�hat is existing and what is propoced, and this should be clearly
.zndicated. The City En�-ineer added he ��:ouid l,_'c� to see a1� �L �he
new property corners established in the field. As a last point, he
stated in regard to signatures on the title page, onF. sheet is in
er�or, and asked that map be conaitioned upon correction or signatures.
The City Engineer reported that with the exception of the above
points, trie map appears technically correct. He deferred to the City
Attorney and the City Fianner for additional cornment.
City Attorney Coleman spoke to the requirement of the building code
which state� that openings in building walls must be 2�1' from the
property line. This is ir� relation to the building on Parc:_,ls D
and E. He was n.ot sure if the window in the building on Parcel D
was.20' away from the diagonal property line which is the boundary
of Parcel E. He commented that the Commission has the authority
to waive this building code requirement. The City Attorney also
noted that on the map is a sec:tion about the common wall agreement.
In his opinion that section is unnecessary since the common wall
agreement is between two lessees. He consi�•�red important only
the designation of a common wall on the map.
Mr. Davzd Keyst n told Commissioners that he did not object to any
of the conditons br.�ught up by the City Engineer, and h2 could haue
the map corrected by the next day. He noted t_iat nis engineer had
been instructed to draw the diagonal line 20' away from the open�ng,
and stated if it is within 10'-20' he would have wire glass put
�.nto the windows that would be acceptable.
Commissioner 3acobs brought up minimum.requirements for M-1. Mr.
Keyston commenLed with relation to landscaping that open water near
tris bui_lding tends to offset landscaping.
Commissioner Mink moved that the Commission accept the tentative and
final maps with the agreement of the property owner that signatures
be withheld until tiie conditions are met that are enumerated by
the City Engineer. Commissioner Taylor seconded the motion and it
carried on unanimous roll call vote, Commissioner Norberg absent.
_ �'"._
c
��`..` _.`: J>
THE CITY OF BIJRLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION
March 22, 1976
CONIMISSIONERS PRESENT COMMISSIONERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT
Francard
Jacobs
Kindig
Aiink
r:�rberg
Sine
fiaylor
None City Planner Swan
Asst. City Planner Yost
City Engineer Davidson
City Attorney Co'_ �i�,ari
ROLL CALL .
The above named members were present.
CALL TO ORDER
��������
I-1t R u - lyd ���
�i�r af ���r��rr���nt�
F1.�NPJl�l� #��t��,.
[� regular meetii;g of the Burlingame Planr. �ng Commiss�.on was called to
order �,y Chairman Sine on thP above date a= 7:30 P. M.
MINUTES
TiZe m.inutes of tne meeting of March 8, 1976 were approved as.written
with the following corrections:
Page 8, second paragraph, fourth line: ". ..above the review line
of 200 SF for this .."
SPECIAL CONIMENDATION FOR COL. E. L. NORBERG
Page l, last line, 2,000 cubic feet
Page 3, 4th p%.ragraph, first line "', ..could not disclaim .."
" " " , fourth line ". . was able to distinguish . ."
Page 5, under DRIVEWAYS: ". ..eventual self-ccntainment oi some Iots."
° " : delete ". .58 more parking spaces." and
add '. a � nun�e~ of added parking spaces."
At this point Chairman Sine announced that a special e-aent would
take place nonoring Col. E. L. Norberg on the occasion of his retire-
ment from the Planning Commission after 20 years of service.
Chairman Sine noted the presence in the audience of Mrs. Hollis
Norbe.r.g, and the Nerbergs' ch�ldren, Be'.tina and David Coleman �nd
Willard and Mrs. Norberg. Also present were Councilman and Mrs.
Amstr.up, Councilman and P�rs. Crosby, for_mer`Councilman Dorothy
Cusick, Councilman Martin, Mr. and Mrs. Burress Karmel, former
Planning Commissioners Stivers and Cistulli, City Clerk Hill, Mrs.
Sine, Mrs. Kindig, AZrs. Swan and others. The following program
included remarks by Chairman Sine and City Planner Swan, reading of
reso'ution from Commissioner Taylor, a poem, presentation of plaque,
and special presentation of Vikir.g helmets by the Burlingame
gIistorical Soci_ty. Chairman Sine chen invited friends and press
to a reception for Col. and Mrs. Norberg in the coffee shop.
Commissioner Taylor moved adjournment of the meeting, Commissioner
Jacobs seconded and the motion carried by voice votea
RECONVENE
The regular meeting reconvened at 8:30 P. M.
c-