The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1008 Toyon Drive - Staff Report (2)� City of Burlingame Design Review for a First and Second Story Addition Item # DSR Study Calendar Address: 1008 Toyon Drive Meeting Date: 1/12/04 Request: Design review for a first and second story addition at 1341 Laguna Avenue, zoned R-1 (C.S. 25.28.040) Applicant/Architect: Randy Grange, TRG Architects Property Owner: Wayne Fairbrother/Jenny Heath APN: 026-240-130 General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Lot Area: 5,150 SF Date Submitted: November 19, 2003 Zoning: R-1 Summary: The applicant is requesting design review for a frst and second story addition at 1008 Toyon Drive, zoned R- 1. The existing house is one-story and 1,921 SF (0.37 FAR). The project includes remodeling the interior of the first floor along with removing a small portion (24 SF) on the left side of the house and adding approximately 60 SF at the rear. The second story addition will be 889 SF and will add three bedrooms and two full bathrooms. The addition will increase the total floor area of the house to 2,741 SF (0.53 FAR), where 2,748 SF (0.53 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The existing attached one-car garage is non-conforming with a 19'6" depth. Because the number of bedrooms will be increasing from 3 to 4(study is counted as a bedroom for the parking calculation) the parking space dimensions for the one required covered space must meet current dimension requirements, 10' wide by 20' deep. As part of this proposal the applicant will be moving back the rear wall of the garage 6" to get enough length. The proposed garage change will meet the parking requirement for this four bedroom house. PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D SETBACKS Front: 1st flr 19'-7" 19'-6" 15'-0" or block average (18') 2nd flr 35'-6" N/A 20� Side (left): IS` flr 4'-10" 4'-10" 4'-0" 2nd �rY 14' N/A J� Side(right) IS` flr 4'-10" 4'-10" 4'-0" 2nd �ZY 7'-10" 15' Rear: 1st flr 33'-2" 34'-8' 15'-0" 2nd flr 34'-8" N/A 20'-0„ LOT 38.5% 37.3 % 40% COVERAGE: (1,985 SF) (1,921 SF) (2,400 SF) FAR: 2,741 SF/ 1,921 SF/ 2,748 SF/ 0.53 FAR 0.37 FAR 0.53 FAR PARKING: 1 covered 1 covered 1 covered �io° X ao�) (io° Xi9�6�� (io° X Zo°) + 1 uncovered + 1 uncovered + 1 uncovered HEIGHT: 24' 17' 2'h stories or 30' whichever is less DHENT�: Meets Requirement Meets Requirement See Code This project meets all code requirements. Staff Comments: See attached. Catherine Barber Planner c: Randy Grange, TRG Architects, applicandarchitect r ` .;�.. _ , � . . ' �r�, c�rr o� CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT ` ' ' gURUNS,AME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ;�..� ��.�'� TEL: (650) 558-7250 Site: 1008 TOYON DRIVE Application for design review for a first and second story addition at: 1008 TOYON DRIVE, zoned R-1. (APN: 026-240-130). The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, January 12, 200y at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. • Mailed: December 31, 2003 (Please refer to other side) �. A copy of the a to the meeting Burlingame, Ca1 If you chal ge raising onl ho; described i t at or prior t Property o ers tenants ab t tt 558-7250. ari � Margaret c City Planner CITY OF B URLINGAME � ay be reviewed prior la D a ent 1 Primrose Road, �� ', � �ct--a�plicai�o�>�� , u ma be limited to you or sc�mea� �� ed a he blic hearing, r:��vri�t � e� ' e d to the city � � _ t te. iQ.:r�`ive this �otice are responsi or i orming their no ��;. �'or �c�ditional ��informatio ple e call (650) �zu. � °�� ` � �� , � � ° � � ' �� t �I ��iF��i�� ICE PU (Please refer to other side) PUBLIC-M�ARING NOTICE City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes � �� IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS January 12, 2004 10. 1008 TOYON DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; WAYNE FAIRBROTHER AND JENNIFER HEATH, PROPERTY OWNERS) (43 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. 11. Chair Bojues opened the public comment. Randy Grange, Architect, 205 Park Road, was available for questions. Commissioners asked the applicant to think about the front door treatment, since the front door will no longer be in the center of the porch, can something be done to make more of an entry statement. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar when the revisions to the plans regarding the front door have been made and plan checked. Commissioners noted that it is an excellent project, and will trust the architect's j udgement on what changes to make to the front entry. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Chair Bojues called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent action calendar when plans had been revised as directed and checked by the Planning Department. The motion passed on a voice vote 6- 0-1 (Cmsr. Keele absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:32 p.m. 1318 BENITO AVENUE, ZONED R- - ICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIG NVELOP OR A FIRST AND SECOND ��ITION. (FRANK PRENDERGAST, AP ICANT AND ARCHITECT; PIERRE PROPERTY OWNERSI (55 N ICEDI PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN : SP Brooks briefly presented the oj ect description. A letter was submitted om the neighbor to the north at 1320 Benito Avenue which note that there is a large, old redwood tree o is property which extends over the property line and may requi' trimming for the proposed second ory to be built; he asked that an arborist report be required to de rmine if removal of the necessary 1' bs would affect the tree, and as d that the required tree trimming e done by a qualified tree trimm' service. There were no questi s of staff. _�.,� Chair � es opened the public commen Prendergast, Architect, 1124 Summer Aven�ie, was avail e for questions. Commission sked if he had given thought to the ,_ t�rint of the build' ', it now exte s well back into the rear y , could he be mare aggressive in w' ening the'� se and ling it in fr the back yard; also asked ut the metal railings in front, will the ; e as bold as is s on the plans. �;o- The applicant noted that the roject was to add a second floor to an existing house, was working with the existing footprint, it seeme ogical to orient the second floor to the north wall of the existing house, didn't want to interfere with the ont porch, and was responding to the wi: es of the owner. He noted that there will be no change to t xisting metal railing. � 7 ��