The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2829 Tiburon Way - Staff Report (2)Y Item # CITY OF BURLINGAME HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE Address: 2829 Tiburon Way Meeting Date: 2/24/97 Requests: Hillside Area Construction Permit and Lot Coverage Variance (CS 25.28.071) for a 250 SF patio cover at 2829 Tiburon Way, zoned R-1. Applicant: Eberhard Woerz Property Owner: Kristina Woerz Dooman Lot Area: 9,290 SF APN: 025-033-090 General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Adjacent Development: Single Family Residential CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 Class 1 - (e) additions to existing structures provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Summary: The applicant, Eberhard Woerz, is requesting a hillside area construction permit and lot coverage variance for a 10'-0" x 25'-0" patio cover (250 SF) at 2829 Tiburon Way, zoned R-1. The lot coverage variance is required for 43.2% lot coverage where 40% is the maximum allowed (CS 25.28.071). The existing house is nonconforming in lot coverage (40.5%). The patio cover will. be attached to the rear of the house and is located approximately 30'-0" from the side property line (along Sebastian Drive) and 42'-0" from the rear property line. The overall height of the patio cover is 9'-0" from grade. The existing house has a total floor area of 6,004.5 SF (including garage) and is located on a 9,290 SF lot. History: In July 1967, the Planning Commission approved a rear setback variance for 8'-0" where 15'-0" is required for an indoor heated swimming pool (July 24, 1967 P.C. Minutes). The variance was granted on the finding that an average of 15' in the rear setback was exceeded. The addition was noted to comply with the maximum lot coverage at the time. PROPOSED EXISTING ALLOWED/REQ'D Front Setback : not affected Side Setback (L): not affected (R): 30'-0" 14'-0" 7'-0" Rear Setback: 43'-0" 8'-0" 15'-0" Lot Coverage: *43.2% 40.5% 20'-0" Building Height: not affected Parking: not affected * Lot coverage variance required. Hillside Area Construction Perinit and Lot Coverage Variance 2829 Tiburon Way H.A.C.P.: Declining Height: Floor Area Ratio: Accessory Structures: Fences/Hedges: Trees: *Requires Hillside Area Construction Permit n/a 6,254.5 SF proposed 6,004.5 SF existing none no change no trees to be removed Meets all other zoning code requirements. Staff Comments: The Building Official, City Engineer and Fire Marshal had no comments. Planning staff notes that it is difficult to get an accurate measurement of the lot size because the shape of the lot is unusual. This may explain why the existing house is nonconforming in lot coverage. When the property owners applied for a rear setback variance for an addition in 1967, the City Planner noted that lot coverage was not an issue and that the property had ample rear yard and side setbacks (July 24, 1967 P.C. Minutes). In order to get an accurate calculation of the lot size for this project, Planning staff asked the Engineering Dept. to use coordinate geometry (using given bearings and distances). By this method, the most accurate available to us, the lot size was determined to be 9,290 SF. Ruben Hurin Zoning Technician c: Eberhard Woerz, applicant 2 .CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 24, 1967 �_ariancos ommissionew Br un-T again, raised the q�� ion whether the aw permitted in h�i. t, rather than size o lr�cation. He qu tioned whether height vaariances could b-- orantede Mr. Sohn Gi: ,, 10 Mounds Road, Sany-ia.teo, associated ;kith inter-Con.tjijeijt�j T'rzdinf Cc:Tr at.iw,i, stated' /thata comparky called u on experts t=o create an a.est ae th ro.ily acceptabl serve their puresess tha.t: a :reed dogs exis° to ideratify the psince Adrian. ad is difficult toreach an , at thy.: preset tlitors are aler d to the General � ec ricsign to Ma I -he general loc In Com-mi.ssioner . pierce's inquiry reg ding the nature of ithe9 bu.s' .3as.s, Kt_x Gates advig6d that as di.stribu rs of € lympia T jTe iters in/thirteen western sty es they maintain an/extensive warehouse-1 faci.lit7 ay Adrian Redo ehero was c.oax:,.dera e d::_.cu_=��.on coF�G�srr�ir1g public asivert��lng adva��:ages to be dari.tav d :�ro€� the display. Commissioners B "WhIer_�.nd Kihdig a.gTp'bd t nt the sign differed liet e .p from other is; � .!here haight* variances were approved i.pa the industrial area on a ple ofaed for adequ�t r ider�zi£icationo r Commi.ssione Pierco stated that wehousing openati�n would not noraa ly neev to '' : I f its location t p€�tent: al custemovs and that it dcui 8ppeaa vh ap �li.cants were c-Q e-ined more with ad ertising than ide i.fi-3 i _*i Dn g hat this cl ty , aa?il.�. neighboring citdef �.»his expended ? �- cider .able a fort to control the n�arber and type of s n displays and t�`at in hi cpinion circumstance did not justify t)ie vsriancea Th� a were no comments f oar the audience fay. Iri.ng or prote:sti�j the a I�licatia"n0 The hearing was decia ed concluded,. 0.1 a motion €ntrad� ed by Commissioner / indig s icanda;d ,4_ comeiss i oner Mink and cerri.ed �.. t�-6e foll:��in8 rob call th"� retques ' for variance was approved in acc q ance with the dra jings on file.. AYE$: C014M'� SIGNER-S Brauner./Cistulli, Kindi rink, Norberg NOES:/-N9.6776 SSIONER4: Niece >r ABSENSSI��NERS.- Edward/ The applware informed t � variance would "be effective Tu -day, August 9 if not appeal do o co. jacc:F c n s Fr iced by CoMmissa °afar Brauner th& the CO3e�' (�/ask,,�q mho yp�.� *v S o f0 t granting of{# Sig:a height 8 i.ggh, �tj variance:�, bQr the. l'.iTmra'..sJ+7ion,... �. �0.�aY agrcied, that the %i�a E�'re _One be 1:.�x�. to ed' at' b A4�'��z-o st )» meeting . o REAR YARD VARf A.► CE A`PPROVEQ TIBURON WAY AND SEBAS T IAA' DRIV 6 Chairman list arsno;..arscG' a public hearing on the applicati�Dn fob variance filed by Mr. and Mrs- E.P. tyoe:rz, 1712 Toledo Avenue,, appar- tai.nin to unimproved r,�roparty at the soaxt�f�sa�'�erly� coiiter of Tjbu= oar 5a I�URLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 24, 1967 . - ay and S-610astian Drive (Lot 9. Black 33, Mills Estate No. 11) ,, to ermit a triangular intrusion of from 0 feet to 7 feet into rear set- back area. where 15 feet is required. An elevation of a. proposed reside ice'$ prepared by Robert E. Onorato and. Assoc i t.es, was filed. A letter dated June 28, 1967 from firs. Woerz advised of a physical disorder Arum which she suffers and that her physician has recommended a program of daily swimming in a heated pool as a form of therapy. The letter sir.-ted that the variance is requested in order to enclose a heated swimming pool under one wing of a new hovie to be constructed on the TiburoD flay property since local weather is not conducive to outdoor .shimming throughout the year. A letter dated June 20, 1967 was read fron Irving Stvrnr M.D., South San Franciszo, Mr. Robea't E, On^rato$ represent ..ng the applicants, discussed the drawings and the extent tha' the structure will protrude into the rear yard The City Planile °, in. reply to Commission inquiry, reported that lot coverage is: not involved;--- this is a corner property wit'. ample rear yard and side setbacks. ,Omments we r�t invited from the audience, Mir. William Minucciani. a Jr., 1126 Ea.stmoor Roads owner of unimproved property adi9cent at the rear to the subject property, questioned whether the slope at the bask, of his lot will be disturbed. Afro Minuctiani examined the draw-Ings and indicated no objection following Mr. dn.oratcls discussion of construction details. There were - no zurther COM"Men-ts flow- the aiudi.ence. The hearint, was declared conclude el. Commissioi,e-l� sNorberg commented that the plan iindic:ates mare than- adeq gate- open Zrea rug rd the building emd that the average of the Tear yard meets code roe, ui I°emeajt s, ,y. A notion was thereafter inn-roduced by Com5i.ssi.oneF Norberg to approve the Variance an accordance with the elat-� ion .an file. Motion secon led bQj° CS �dY 3 a� F+nf: Y i?i e`'.'.•lneT And ' car"ri(G` d unanirfiou i v on `-' o , Ca -& is c yv � ifgqCCcyyi"�airy+�wi')3�•`go"-�:Ced the trait- zrvr a �ioule. be effective, •Pt. esde`.-�.:, tuwuSr 8 . if not 4Zppe-..y...tl eGi la 4 C g EN r ATI Y r Ik c� �,2&. cl K �c - [ y ti.HCOMMEN �.a 1i 4.'•yrzEatz G.i �J4.�"`iid. e'-t th1.sa Te .Wat "e. ��r �1is" `� t0� � �9� Est£�tR�'` P�'"F?":: ; :'41 n `,� d is�i%5" �° (�:�x ff i.s x 7 c `V i.P::L ta'A: �a<. x14. Li.Y ::.- .:.' �'s.s n:�%:.M <i3O fCJ!.�6 � :.n .iy re.-'..ves —4— t i bar "g K. h a: Ark Cis Ow euRUN4.Mi CITY OF BURLINGAM E APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING CON MUSSION Type of Application: Special Permit X Variance Other Project Address: 2829 Tiberon Way, Burlingame, CA 94010 Assessor's Parcel Number(s) : O Z 5- 0 3 3— 090 APPLICANT ---- Name: Petkus Bros. Address: 3068 Sunr' e Blv . #D City/State/Zip: Ra cho Co ova, Phone (w) : ( 1 6) 6 3 - 9 9 6 6 SAMF. 1�BnVE (h): PROPERTY OWNER Elo e r k& r� Name: Mr. & Mrs. Woerz Address: 2829 Tiberon Way 9574&ty/State/Zip: Burlingame, CA Phone (w): (41 5) 692-7262 SAME AS ABOVE (9y6) 635-9,'81 fn�- N/A 0o e rZe 94010 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: Please indicate with an asterisk * the Address: contact person for this application. City/State/Zip: Phone (w): (h): fax: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Lattice Patio Cover AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belies. x � & 1 Applicant's Signature Da I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. X / 9 Property Owner's SignqtOe Date ----------------------------------------------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ----------------------------------------- Date Filed: 2 I l0 I q 7 Fee: 4 3 10 Planning Commission: Study Date: c g 4 g 7 Action Date: 3 to q CITY O� BURUNGAME CITY OF BURLINGAME VARIANCE APPLICATIONS The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions will assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your property which do not apply to other properties in this area. b. Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and what unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship might result from the denial of the application. Ak l2-c-►�� i�� %� , fir' Vtt C. Explain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience. d. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? 12/92 varArm