HomeMy WebLinkAbout2810 Tiburon Way - ApplicationAPPLICATION
PROJECT APPLICATION °'T" 2810 Tiburon Way
Er CEQA ASSESSMENT BURLINGAME project address ---
Application received ( 12/28/81) ... ..•'•• Projname - if any
Staff review/acceptance ( 1/ 411 3 Z )
I. APPLICANT Dr. Donald T. Odone 697-2490
name telephone no.
2810 Tiburon Way, Burlingame, CA. 94010
applicants address: street, city, zip code
Mary Dunlap 593-7931
contact person, if different telephone no.
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION
Special Permit ( ) Variance* (X ) Condominium Permit ( ) Other
*Attach letter which addresses each of the 4 findings required by Code Chapter 25.54.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
VARIANCE to allow a 419 SF bedroom addition to an existing home
which will increase total lot coverage to 42.8%; Code Sec. 25.
66.010 allows a maximum of 40% lot coverage. Other zoning
requirements for parking, height, setbacks and yards are met by
the proposed design.
(attach letter of explanation if additional space is needed)
Ref. code section(s): (25.66.010 ) ( )
4. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
( 025-031-060 ) ( 7 ) ( 32 > ( Mills Estate No. 11 )
APN lot no. block no. subdivision name
( R-1 ) ( 8,000 )
zoning district land area, square feet
Irene F. Standish 2810 Tiburon Way
land owner's name aBuri S.
ngame, CA. 94010
Required Date received city zip code
(yes) {ttc) ( IZ-1ZA191 ) Proof of ownership
(yes) Ana) ( (Z'2$�81 ) Owner's consent to application
5. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
Existing single family dwelling with attached garage.
Required Date received
(yes) (as)= (12/28/81) Site plan showing: property lines; public sidewalks and
curbs; all structures and improvements;
paved on -site parking; landscaping.
(yes) (ya)= (12/28/81) Floor plans of all buildings showing: gross floor area
by type of use on each floor plan.
(yes) (as)= (12/28/81) Building elevations, cross sections (if relevant).
(yes) (no) ( - - ) Site cross section(s) (if relevant).
(other) (12/28/81) Letter of explanation
*Land use classifications are: residential (show # dwelling units); office use; retail
sales; restaurant/cafe; manufacturing/repair shop; warehousing; other (to be described).
6. PROJECT PROPOSAL
- Proposed construction, Below grade ( - SF) Second floor ( - SF)
gross floor area First floor ( 419 SF) Third floor ( - SF)
Project Code Project Code
Proposal Requirement Proposal Requirement
Front setback Lot coverage 42.8% 40%
Side setback NO C h Building height
:r Side yard Landscaped area
Rear yard 15'0 On -site pkg.spaces 2 2
6. PROJECT PROPOSAL (continued)
EXISTING IN 2 YEARS
after after
8-5 5 PM 8-5 5 PM
Full time emnloyees on site
Part time employees on site
Visitors/customers (weekday)
Visitors/customers (Sat.Sun.)
Residents on property
Trip ends to/from site*
Peak hour trip ends*
Trucks/service vehicles
*Show calculations on reverse side or attach separate sheet.
7. ADJACENT BUSINESSES/LAND USES
Single family dwellings on all adjacent sites; plans
comply with the General Plan.
Required Date received
=(ym) (no) ( - ) Location plan of adjacent properties.
(yL-S) (no) ( - ) Other tenants/firms on property:
8. FEES
IN 5 YEARS
after
8-5 5 PM
no. firms ( ) no. employees ( )
floor area occupied ( SF office space)
( SF other)
no. employee vehicles regularly on site ( )
no. company vehicles at this location ( )
Special Permit, all districts $100 ( ) Other application type, fee $ ( )
Variance/R-1,R-2 districts $ 40 (X ) Project Assessment $ 25 ( )
Variance/other districts $ 75 ( ) Negative.Declaration $ 25 ( )
Condominium Permit $ 50 ( ) EIR/City & consultant fees $ ( )
TOTAL FEES $ 40.00 RECEIPT NO. 3737 Received by M Monroe
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is
true and correct to.the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date I -i- - Z C, . E1
STAFF USE ONLY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION File No.
The City of Burlingame by on
completed a review of the proposed project and determined that:
( ) It will not have a significant effect on the environment.
( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required.
Reasons for a Conclusion:
Categorically Exempt: Reference
Natural Resources Code Sec. 15101, Class 1.
19 ,
MwA- wiylaQ C'n, "'M L� L'qez-
SigJ'Ature of Processing Official I Title Date Signed
Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the determination shall be final.
DECLARATION OF POSTING Date Posted:
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that
I posted a true copy of the above Negative Declaration at the City Hall of said City near
the doors to the Council Chambers.
Executed at Burlingame, California on , 19
Appealed: ( )Yes ( )No
._. EVELYN H. HILL, CITY CLERK, CITY OF BURLINGAME �
STAFF REVIEW
1. CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION
Project proposal/plans have been circulated for review by:
date circulated
reply received
memo attached
City Engineer (12/29/81 )
(yes) (no)
(yes)
(no)
Building Inspector (12/29/81 )
(yes) (no)
(.yes)
(no)
Fire Inspector (12/29/81 )
(yes) (no)
(yes)
(no)
Park Department ( _ _ )
(yes) (no)
(yes)
(no)
City Attorney ( — — )
(yes) (no)
(yes)
(no)
2. SUMMARY OF STAFF CONCERNS/POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES
Concerns
Mitigation
Measures
Are the four legal requirements
for a Variance met by the
proposed application?
Review application; make
findings.
Do the plans meet
the require-
Request comments from the
ments of the Fire
and Building
Chief Fire Inspector and
Departments?
Chief Building Inspector.
3. CEQA REQUIREMENTS
If a Negative Declaration has not been posted for this project:
Is the project subject to CEQA review? No - categorically exempt.
IF AN EIR IS REQUIRED:
Initial Study completed (
) Study by P.C. ( )
Decision to prepare EIR (
) Review period ends ( )
Notices of preparation mailed (
) Public hearing by P.C. ( )
RFP to consultants (
) Final EIR received by P.C. ( )
Contract awarded (
) Certification by Council ( )
Admin. draft EIR received (
) Decision on project ( )
Draft EIR accepted by staff (
) Notice of Determination ( )
Circulation to other agencies (
)
4. APPLICATION STATUS
Date first received (12/28/81 )
/phone
Accepted as complete: no( X ) Call to
applicant advising info. required (12/29/81 )
Yes( ) date
P.C. study ( )
Is application ready for a public hearing? (yes) (no) Recommended date ( 1/ 1 1/ 82 )
Date staff report mailed to applicant (
) Date Commission hearing ( )
Application approved ( ) Denied (
) Appeal to Council (yes) (no)
Date Council hearing ( )
Application approved ( ) Denied ( )
I�
signed date