The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2628 Summit Drive - Staff ReportItem No. Regular Action PROJECT LOCATION 2628 Summit Drive City of Burlingame Item No. _ Regular Action Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit Address: 2628 Summit Drive Meeting Date: September 12, 2011 Request: Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for changes to a previously approved first and second story addition. Applicant and Architect: Ellis A. Schoichet, AIA APN: 027-271-050 Property Owners: Wayne and Julissa Westerman Lot Area: 19,387 SF General Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1 Environmental Review Status: The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. Project History: On December 13, 2010, the Planning Commission approved an application for Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2628 Summit Drive, Zoned R-1 (December 13, 2010, Planning Commission Minutes). On February 28, 2011, the Planning Commission approved an application for Design Review Amendment and Front Setback Variance for changes to the previously approved first and second story addition due to the original attached garage being structurally deficient. A building permitwas issued on July 14, 2011, and construction is currently underway. Proposed Revisions: The applicant is now requesting an Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for changes to the previously approved first and second story addition at 2628 Summit Drive, Zoned R-1. The applicant is requesting the following changes: ■ A 5.8 SF addition to the mechanical enclosure along the left side of the house; ■ A 35.1 SF bay window addition at the kitchen nook area off the rear of the house; ■ Modification of stair, walk and retaining wall areas around the rear of the house; ■ The guardrail at the rear elevation was changed from wood to decorative metal; and ■ Enlargement of the second story terrace over the proposed first level bay window. The applicant submitted a letter describing all of the changes in the plans on August 26, 2011. Other than the changes listed above, there are no changes to the design of the house. The applicant is requesting the following application: Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for proposed changes to a previously approved first and second story addition. Summary of Previously Approved Project: The existing single-story house with an attached three-car garage contains 3,591 SF (0.18 FAR) of floor area and has three bedrooms. The applicant is proposing to add 368 SF along the left side of the existing first floor, to increase the ceiling height in the living room to over 12'-0" and to build a new, 560 SF second story. With the proposed project, there will be an increase in the floor area from 3,591 SF (0.18 FAR) to 5,048 SF (0.26 FAR) where 7,304 SF (0.38 FAR) is the maximum allowed. The proposed project is 2,256 SF below the maximum allowed FAR. With this project, the number of potential bedrooms is increasing from three (3) to four (4). Two parking spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The existing attached garage will be rebuilt in its existing location and will provide three code-compliant covered parking spaces (30' x 20' clear interior dimensions). One Design Review Amendment and Front Setback Variance 2628 Summit Drive uncovered parking space (9' x 20') is provided in the driveway. All other Zoning Code requirements have been met. The applicant was approved for the following applications on December 13, 2010 and February 28, 2011: ■ Design Review for a first and second story addition to a single family dwelling (CS 25.57.010, a, 5); ■ Hillside Area Construction Permit for a first and second story addition (C.S. 25.61.020); and ■ Front Setback Variance for replacement of the existing attached garage (12'-8" existing and proposed, where 16'-1", block average, is the minimum required) (CS 25.28.072 b). 2628 Summit Drive Lot Area: 19,387 SF Plans date stam ed: Au ust 26, 2011 EXISTING ; PREVIOUS REVISED ; ALLOWED/REQUIRED ; APPROVAL ; PROPOSAL SETBACKS ; ......................................................................:.....................................................................................................:.......... . .. . _ ... ....._.._ ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Front (1St flr): ; 12'-8" 12'-8" no change 16'-1" (block average) (2"d flr): ; none 20'-0" no change 20'-0" .......................................................:.......................................... ..................................................�............................... ... .. .. .........., ............. _............................ ... . ..................... _................ Side (left): ; 4'-8" ; no change ; 7�_O�� , „ ; , „ no change , „ (right): � 29 -9 19 -9 7 -0 ...................................... ..... .... ............................. .............................................. . � � . ........._ ..................._......_....._._...... ... .................................................................._.............................,...................................................................................... ........... ........................ Rear (1st f/r): 16'-7" no change 15'-0" ' no change (2nd flr): none 87'-0" 20'-0" : .............................................._................ .. . � _.... _._.._......, ................................................................................................:...................................................................................................................................... Lot Coverage: ; 3,709 SF 4,008 SF 4,049 SF 7,755 SF 19% 20.7% 20.9% 40% ................. ......................................................;.............................................................. _..........................................................................................; ............................................................................................:..........._........................................_.. _... .. _ ........................................... FAR: ; 3,591 SF 5,048 SF 5,089 SF 7,304 SF' 0.18 FAR 0.26 FAR 0.26 FAR ' 0.38 FAR _.......__......__ ........................_...._...........�.....................................................................................................:.................................................... .... . , _ .............................................................................................................................._....................._................ _ .. . . .... ...................................... # of bedrooms: � 3 4 no change --- ......................... ....................................................._..................:................................................................................. : � ........................... ...................................................._............. . _............__............................................... Parking: � 3 covered 1 covered , , � � � (30 x 20 ) no change no change ' (10 x 20 ) 1 uncovered � 1 uncovered (9' x 20') (9' x 20') ;......._ . ... . ............................_................. . ..... . ... ...... ..: . ................._......._........................... . _ . ....................................................._9...........................,....... .. .. Height: ; 7 below average ' 10'-8" no chan e 30'-0" 11 top of curb _ ........................_.................... . . .............................................................._....... ....................,. ...................... . _._......__._ ...... .... _ ...................._.....-�--------......_.. ..... .. .... . , ................ _ .. .....,...._... .... .. . . DH Envelope: n/a complies no change CS 25.28.075 ' (0.32 x 19,387 SF) + 1,100 SF = 7,303.8 SF (0.38 FAR) Staff Comments: See attached original memos from the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer, City Arborist and NPDES Coordinator. Design Review Criteria: The criteria for Design Review as established in Ordinance No. 1591 adopted by the Council on April 20, 1998 are outlined as follows: 1. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the neighborhood; 2. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood; 3. Architectural style and mass and bulk of structure; -2- Design Review Amendment and Front Setback Variance 4. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties; and 5. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components. 2628 Summit Drive Required Findings for Hillside Area Construction Permit: Review of a Hillside Area Construction Permit by the Planning Commission shall be based upon obstruction by construction of the existing distantviews of nearby properties. Emphasis shall be given to the obstruction of distant views from habitable areas within a dwelling unit (Code Sec. 25.61.060). Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should conduct a public hearing on the application, and consider public testimony and the analysis contained within the staff report. Action should include specific findings supporting the Planning Commission's decision, and should be affirmed by resolution of the Planning Commission. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 26, 2011, sheets A0.2, A3, A5, A7 and A8; and date stamped February 16, 2011, sheets A0, A0.1, A1, A2, A4 and A6; and date stamped October 28, 2010, Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's October 5, 2010 and September 27, 2010 memos, the City Engineer's October 21, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's October 19, 2010 letter and September 30, 2010 memo, the Park Supervisor's October 12, 2010 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's September 27, 2010 memo shall be met; 5. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Front Setback Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 6. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 7. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 8. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which -3- Design Review Amendment and Front Setback Variance 2628 Summit Drive requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Erica Strohmeier Associate Planner c. Ellis A. Schoichet, applicant and architect, 307 South B Street #12, San Mateo, CA 94401 Wayne and Julissa Westerman, property owners, 2628 Summit Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010 Attachments: Application to the Planning Commission Letter of explanation for Amendment, date stamped August 26, 2011 Minutes from the February 28, 2011, Planning Commission Regular Action Meeting Minutes from the December 13, 2010, Planning Commission Regular Action Meeting Staff Comments from originally approved project Planning Commission Resolution (Proposed) Notice of Public Hearing — Mailed September 2, 2011 Aerial Photo -4- � CITY .�r � d 'r< �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 501 PRIMROSE ROAD • BURLINGAME, CA 9401 O p: 650.558.7250 • f: 650.696.3790 • www.burlingame.org APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: �Design Review ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Special Permit PROJECT ADDRESS: ❑ Parcel #: � � � � v� b ^ � ❑ Other: -� O Please indicate the contact person for this project APPLICANT project contact person ��/� OK to send electronic copies of documents Ue� Name: r%��i��. ��.�r��-C �� Address: �_��a�[(. �h��e�e� �Z. �f �fa I City/State/Zip: � Phone: �O.'�� PROPERTY OWNER project contact person ❑ OK to send electronic opies of documents � Name: ' c_ cw Address: �� nnt� �v�i�2� City/State/Zip: ( ' w�� Phone: �1�� %� Fax: �OSo • �{� �S�c�� Fax: E-mail: ?AS� @_EG�'��,hk..�he.-�' E-mail: WuUeS�Y'1�►�'ic�v� Ga w►a� . c.�wt a�� , c��a..l e�r a� hot.h�ai,( , c�w. ARCHITECT/DESIGNER project contact person ❑ J OK to send electronic copies of documents lH� Name: �61�;,T_�c_h��P� f�ft� AddrE City/� Phon� Fax: E-ma * Bu P,ROJ�CT DESC�IPTION: �q ctn ih�reaa� o �{o�►y q �.._. . . .,. .� � [_. � ,. _ .. -� - w� �3��8 3�/�. E,a � AFFADAVIT/SIGN URE: I he best of my knowl ge and belief �� penalty of perjury that the information d�� OCG r�e.s�(�x� �y ah � n herein is true and correct to the Ap�li,ant's si nat�re: Date: 3 Zo/v I am aware of t posed pli ation and hereby authorize the above applicant to submi this application to the Planning Gommission. � �� Property owner's signature: Date: Date submitted: ��, * Verification that the project architect/designer has a valid Burlingame business license will be required by the Finance Department at the time application fees are paid. ❑ Please mark one box above with an X to indicate the contact person for this project. s: �HaN�ours�Pcapplicarion 2oos.hondout.doc ., - - . This Space for CDD Staff Use Only Project Description: � � )_� c .� �� q�..0 -� -�,_ t 4 _ � � , , �=� � t � � ��'-� f'`�" . i � � � � ,�n� , � , ��r� — _ _ � � ` e:' j^ . �' � G( /1 .��1 �'�l�l_c� �� - , K��/: Ab:breviation Term CUP Conditional Use Permit DHE Declinin Hei ht Envelope DSR Desi n Review E Existin N New �F� Sin 6e Famil Cwellir SP Special Permit Delta 2a Drawing Changes Design Review Amendment — Planning Submittal 2628 Summit Drive A0.2 Clouded chan�es ■ Updated footprint at enlarged Mechanical Enclosure #1 and new Breakfast Nook. ■ Modified stair, walk, and retaining wall outside new Breakfast Nook. • Changed exterior stair outside Master Bedroom from wood to brick. ■ Updated Floor Area (Zoning), Lot Coverage, and Floor Area (Thermal Envelope) at enlarged Mechanical Enclosure #1, new Breakfast Nook, and brick stair. Floor area at Mechanical Enclosure #1 increased by 6 sf. Floor area at Breakfast Nook increased by 35 sf. lnsignificant changes / Changes not related to plannin� None A3 Clouded chan�es ■ Added B reakfast Nook. C�' 3 S S�" �� ■ Reduced exterior door at Family Room from double door to single door. ■ Modified stair, walk, and retaining wall outside new Breakfast Nook. ■ Enlarged Mechanical Enclosure #1 and reoriented door. ��--6 s�� ■ Changed exterior stair outside Master Bedroom from wood to bric . anged guard and handrail from wood to metal. ■ Modified windows at east wall of Kitchen. Insignificant changes / Changes not related to �Iannin� ■ Added storage tank at Mechanical Enclosure #1. ■ Modified tank/heat exchanger at workshop area. ■ Modified sink at workshop area. ■ Added existing storm drain junction box to plan. ■ Modified interior layout at Kitchen. A5 Clouded changes ■ Enlarged North Terrace above new Breakfast Nook. ■ Modified length of balustrade at North Terrace. ■ Modified intersection between parapet and sloping roof at North Terrace. ■ Enlarged roof over Mechanical Enclosure #1. Insignificant changes / Changes not related to planning ■ Added iron work outside Stair Landing windows to plan. k 2 F• - � '��'� AUG � 6 2011 CITY OF B�RLIN�AME CDD-PL4NiVING DlV. 8/2 6/11 p. 1 of 2 Deita 2a Drawing Changes Design Review Amendment — P/annin� Submittal 2628 Summrt Drive A7 Clouded chan�es ■ Added Breakfast Nook. ■ Modified stair, walk, and retaining wall outside new Breakfast Nook. ■ Modified (ength of balustrade at North Terrace. ■ Modified intersection between parapet and sloping roof at North Terrace. ■ Modified Mechanical Enclosure #1. ■ Changed exterior stair outside Master Bedroom from wood to brick. Changed guard and handrail from wood to metal. ■ Modified windows at east wall of Kitchen. Insignificant changes / changes not related to �lannin,g ■ Corrected subarea vent type at louvered access hatch. A8 Clouded chan�es ■ Added Breakfast Nook. ■ Modified stair, walk, and retaining wall outside new Breakfast Nook. ■ Modified Mechanical Enclosure #1. ■ Changed exterior stair outside Master Bedroom from wood to brick. Changed guard and handrail from wood to metal. ■ Modified windows at east wall of Kitchen. Insignificant changes / Changes not related to planning None 8/26/11 p. 2 of 2 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMM/SSION — Approved Minutes February 28, 2011 4. 2628 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW AND FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (ELLIS A. SCHOICHET, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; WAYNE AND JULISSA WESTERMAN, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated February 28, 2011, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifteen (15) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Yie opened the public hearing. Ellis Schoichet, 307 South B Street, San Mateo; represented the applicant. Commission comments: ■ Supportive of the application; in the first review of the matter, the Commission preferred a scheme that pushed that mass towards the side of the property proposed. Not approving the request, would result in the massing being pushed into the view corridor. ■ The issue of average front setback in the hillside area is tough argument to make. ■ Appreciates the detailed information submitted in consideration of the requests. ■ Noted potential problems with the window in the shower, may wish to revise this element. ■ The construction is all below the street level; it will not be visible from the street, similar to below grade construction. Public comments: None. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. CommissionerAuran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped February 16, 2011, sheets AO through A8; and date stamped October 28, 2010, Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exteriorfinishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount ortype of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's October 5, 2010 and September 27, 2010 memos, the City Engineer's October 21, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's October 19, 2010 letter and September 30, 2010 memo, the Park Supervisor's October 12, 2010 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's September 27, 2010 memo shall be met; 5. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Front Setback Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; � CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION — Approved Minutes February 28, 2091 6. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 7. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to complywith all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 8. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial orfull demolition of a structure, interiororexterior, shall require a demolition permit; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc. according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Terrones. Discussion of motion: None. will inspect and note compliance of the ) to verify that the project has been built Vice-Chair Yie called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-0-1 (Commissioner Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:30 p.m. 7 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANIV/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes December 93, 2090 Discussion of Supports the m ion with some regret; there coul e some compromise or the sake of neighborliness. ■ Doesn't see a view i e. ■ There is not really a vi obstruction; the further you get into e house, the /ess the i act. ■ esn't see a problem w three roof heights. Vice-Chair ' called fora voice vote the motion to approve. The motion pa ed 5-0-2 (Commissio s Vistica and Lindstrom absent). Appeal cedures were advised. This item co ded at 7:47 p.m. 3. 2628 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (ELLIS A. SCHOICHET, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; WAYNE AND JULISSA WESTERMAN, PROPERTY OWNERS) STAFF CONTACT: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated December 13, 2010, with attachments. Associate Planner Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirteen (13) conditions were suggested for consideration. Vice-Chair Yie opened the public hearing. Ellis Schoichet, 307 South B Street, San Mateo; represented the applicant. ■ Are considering Italian clay roofing tile; provided a small sample for viewing. ■ Also have a significant amount of flat roof; a cool roof may provide too much glare, so are considering a mineral surFace cap-sheet in a brown color. ■ The story poles have been erected; demonstrates minimal impact upon the neighbors. . view or privacy issues with the neighbors. Owners are willing to install additional landscaping if neighbor privacy is a concern. ■ Made attempts to visit 2640 Summit Drive on four occasions, but was unable to visit the property; provided photos from the subject site that demonstrate minimal impact upon this property. ■ Requested that a continuance not occur, since application of the new building code could financially impact the project. Public comments: None. Commission comments: ■ Requested clarification of the metal roofing over the entry. (Schoichet — will use aged copper.) ■ Was able to visit the Lambert property; didn't see any view impacts. The predominant views are to the left of the addition, more toward the airport. ■ Believes that the neighbors at 2620 Summit Drive have some ideas regarding landscaping that would help mitigate any impacts. ■ Well crafted design. ■ Noted that the Garibaldi's son had visited the Lambert property and observed no view impacts from the property. ■ No view impacts from neighbor; the story poles tell the story of how the project hugs the slope. � CITY OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMMISS/ON — Approved Minutes December 13, 2010 There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Terrones moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped October 28, 2010, sheets AO through A6, A8, GP-1 and Boundary and Topographic Survey, and date stamped December 1, 2010, sheet A7; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that the metal roofing over the entry be of a copper, as well as the downspouts; 4. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 5. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's October 5, 2010 and September 27, 2010 memos, the City Engineer's October 21, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's October 19, 2010 letter and September 30, 2010 memo, the Park Supervisor's October 12, 2010 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's September 27, 2010 memo shall be met; 6. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 7. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to complywith all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 8. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 7 CITY OF BURL/NGAME PLANN/NG COMMISSION — Approved Minutes December 13, 2010 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION 4. 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Auran. Discussion of motion: ■ None. Vice-Chair Yie called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 5-0-2 (Commissioners Vistica and Lindstrom absent). Appeal procedure�were advised. This item concluded at 7:57 p.m. 720 ADELINE DRIVE, ONED R-1 — APPLICATI FOR AMENDMENT T DESIGN REVIEW FOR P' OPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY AP ROVED NEW, TWO-S ORY SINGLE FAMILY DE GNER; AND HOYMA AND TRAM HONG, PRO ERTY OWNERS) STA CONTACT: ERICA STR MEIER Referenc�'e staff report dated D cember 13, 2010, with a chments. Associate P�anner Strohmeier presented�� e report, reviewed cri ria and staff comments. ifteen (15) conditions w' e suggested for consideratio�. Vice-Chair Yie ' ened the public heari ��. Hoyman Hong, 17 Adeline Drive; repres ` ted the applicant. . ■ Feels that the roposed horizontal gr s are consistent with t e architecture; as well ' s other recently constru �ed properties in the ar � The original Fren � doors were not practi �, I; feel the sliding doors ` re more functional. Comriaission comments: ■ y remove the vertical�ds? (Hong — liked the look better). ■ Ok ith the horizontal grids. 8 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, AND AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for chanqes to a previously approved first and second story addition at 2628 Summit Drive, zoned R-1, Wayne and Julissa Westerman, propertv owners, APN: 027-271-050; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on Se�tember 12, 2011, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition. 2. Said Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit are approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit are set forth in the staff report, minutes, and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Chairman I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12"' dav of September, 2011 by the following vote: Secretary EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit. 2628 Summit Drive Effective September 22, 2011 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped August 26, 2011, sheets A0.2, A3, A5, A7 and A8; and date stamped February 16, 2011, sheets A0, A0.1, A1, A2, A4 and A6; and date stamped October 28, 2010, Boundary and Topographic Survey; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staf�; 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's October 5, 2010 and September 27, 2010 memos, the City Engineer's October 21, 2010 memo, the Fire Marshal's October 19, 2010 letter and September 30, 2010 memo, the Park Supervisor's October 12, 2010 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's September 27, 2010 memo shall be met; 5. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the Front Setback Variance as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here will become void; 6. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 7. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 8. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 9. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for Categorical Exemption and Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit. 2628 Summit Drive Effective September 22, 2011 to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 11. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2007 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 12. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 13. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 14. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. . CITY OF BURLINGAME ` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � j�tl �1, BURLINGAME, CA 94010 � � PH: (650) 558-7250 • FqX: (650) 696-3790 - www.burlingame.org � _ -=� � � �� ;`�d Site: 2628 SUMMIT DRIVE _ - The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following puhlic hearing on MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA: Application for Amendment to Design Review and Hillside Area Construction Permit for changes to a previously approved first and second story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 2628 SUMMIT DRIVE zoned R-1. APN 027-211-050 Mailed: September 2, 2011 (Please refer to other side) � ��.�� <��ilecS F am ''1(1 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE City of Burlinpame A copy of the application and plans for this project may be reviewed prior to the meeting at the Community Development Department at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. If you challenge the subject application(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in the notice or in written correspondence delivered to the city at or prior to the public hearing. Property owners who receive this notice are responsible for informing their tenants about this notice. For additional information, please call (650) 558-7250. Thank you. William Meeker Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (Please refer to other side)