Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1936.08.27CITI'I,_011?INN ;G.si.'IaSIt': Burli.lgame, California August 27, 1936 The August stated meeti--_g of the Cit~, Planning Jommissiun was held in the City ria,ll, rsurling:a.me, on � Thursday evening ',ugust 27, 1936, at 7:30 -2. :i., Jas -­_- i:_itchell presiding. Present, n,a-Vor C. is ruck, das H. t itchell, tliss Janet _ itogers H. . Vollmer, `41. Coleman, :)r. ade _aa.comber, . ity _ngineer '�olson, amity _, ttorney Davis, F. D. 'nderson 'and C. !:acdonald. The minutes of the meeti _g of June 25, . 19356, were read an" approved as read. A Petiticn signed by Property Owners concerned requesting that the name of the ortion cf Hoover Avenue, running in Eorth and South direction ba cha,ngod to Ool__.mbus _venue. Tile proposed change was approved by_the Commission. rr. 3rnest Volk submitted a sketch of a proposed building on =1 Camino heal, near Pillside drive. The arrangement did not meet the approval of the Gommission, who advised Mr. Volk to re- arrange his plans in line with suggestions made, and to resubmit for further consideration. A request from 1. R. Hoag to zone to Apartments lot No. 11, } block To. 6 in subdivision No. 1, Burlingame Shore band Co. was tentatively approved, final hearing; to take place on September 3 A communication i�.,as received from t.:r. Charles !,`% Parry, 1809 Easton Drive to erect a house in the rear of the lot, back of the present house. The lot has a 50' frontage. The applic- ation was denied. Messrs kirkbride and Wilson , Attorneys for Mr. Duncan R. hIacpherson submitted an application for reclassification of lot No. 79 block Yo. 2, map of Burlingame 2.-3,rk No. 2, situated 150 ft. west of the intersection of Burlingame .eve. and �,'1 Camino Real. It was noted that a previous application had been made by Mr. Macpherson some three years ago �,nd that the property mentioned underwent regular zoning procedure at that time and that it was denied by the Commission. It was the decision of the Commission that conditions re- main*4 praetieually the same as they were then and that nothing has since developed to warrant reconsideration. Chas 1,Lacd6nald, Secretary 5