Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout850 Airport Blvd- Staff Report 2.28.1977� ��l � _ �� -i ,, .� f � � � � � � Y �ItL� C�it� .af ��azrliit����tr SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD DURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(415) 342-8931 • NOTICE OF HEARING VARIANCE ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Monday, the 28th day of February, 1977 , at the � hour of 7:30 P.M., in the City Hall Council Chambers , 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame will conduct a public hearir�g on the application to subdivide a parcel in the C-4 District to create a lot with less than 20,000 SF of area at 850 Airport Boulevard, by Anza Shareholders' Liquidating Trust At the time of the hearing all persons interested will�be heard. For further particulars reference is made to the Planning Department. 0 EVELYN H. HILL CITY CLERK � February 18, 1977 ; � BU:rI i nc,,ame P1 anni ng Commi ss i on Mi nutes � Page 4 February 2�, 1977 3. VARIANCE FROM CODE SEC. 25.41.040 WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 20,000 SF; PROPERTY AT{°850 AIRPORT QOULEVARD,(APN 026-342-250), ZONED C-4, BY ANZA SHAREHOLDERS' LIQUIDATING TRUST C. P. Swan stated this application is required because there are two buildings on one parcel of pro�erty. The applicant wishes to subdivide in order to legally sell the building located at 828 Airport Boulevard. This variance is requested to create a lot that is less �:han 20,000 SF, specifically 17,177 SF. The C. P. said the small building would have adequate parking to serve its needs; however, there is need for cross easements so that people parking there could traverse the adjacent property. The new lot line would be in the middle of the driveway. David Keyston, Anza Shareholders' Liquidating Trust, told Commission the property had been developed and the buildings constructed prior to the adoption of the present lot size requirement of 20,000 SF in this area. He stated the variance is necessary in order to file a parcel map and comply with State Map Act requirements. Chm. Taylor requested audience comments in favor or opposed; there were none, and he declared the public hearing closed. C. Mink moved this application for variance be approved with the following findings of fact: from the evidence that has been presented as part of.the attachments .to this particular application, there is a hardship because this building was constructed before the code requirement for minimum lot size was established and the necessity of filing a map in order to complete sale of the building; further, in no way does this adversely affect the overal1 zoning plan of the City or use in C-4; it is not detrimental to any of the surrounding property owners. Chm. Taylor requested Commission adopt findings of fact as a separate motion, and C. Mink moved the adoption of his previously stated findings of fact. Second C. Cistulli and approved by unanimous voice vote. C. Mink then moved the granting of this variance; second C. Cistulli and approved by unanimous roll call vote. 4. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, QEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK l, ANZA AIRPORT PARK UNIT N0. 4(APN 026-342-250/260) AT 828 AIRPORT BOULEVARD Ai�D 850 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, ZONED C-4, BY HOWARD HICKEY FOR ANZA SHAREHOLDERS'_ LIQUIDATING TRUST C. E. Kirkup referenced his memo of 2/24/77 recommending approval of this parcel map subject to granting of the variance for lot size, and subject to the map showing easements for driveway access in each parcel to the other parcel, in addition to drainage easements from Parcel A through Parcel B. He noted the tentative map does show the easements requested for access and drainage. The final parcel map will grant these in the dedication and in the certification on the map; this map is already in the City Engineer's.office. C. Jacobs moved approval of the tentative parcel map subject to the map showing the easements for driveway access in each parcel to the other parcel and the drainage easements from Parcel A through Parcel B. Second C. Kindig and approved by unanimous roll call vote. David Keyston requested the final map be on tfie March 14 agenda to facilitate this sale. With concurrence of the C.E., Chm. Taylor scheduled the final parcel map for March 14, 1977. 5. VARIANCE FROM C�DE SEC. 25.70.030(a) 4JHICFI REQUIRES THAT THERE BE ONE GARAGE OR CARPORT FOR E�1C1-f SINGLE F�MILY DWELLING; PROPERTY AT 2616 HALE DRIVE (/-1PN 027-172- 1�3Q), ZONED R-1, QY /1LaERT �1ND KATHLEEN THUESEN C. P. Swan briefly reviewed i:his application to remove the existing garage and carport in order to build a deck adjacent to the s�,rimming pool in the backyard. The applicant -Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes � Page 3 ' � � February 28,�1977 C. Mink moved approval of this tentative parcel map for resubdivision with the following conditions: the fence across the sewer easement be removed; curb, gutter, sidewalks, street and utility improvements be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works before filing the final parcel map. Second C. Cistulli and approved on unanimous roll call vote. C. E. Kirkup noted that since improvements are required this map will go to City Council at their next meeting, March 7, 1977. C. Jacobs thanked Mr. Farley for his cooperation in this matter. 2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B and 3D, aLOCK 3, TOWN OF BURLINGAME (APN 029-223-010/020/100/110/120) AT 33 PARK ROAD, ZONED R-3, BY WM. A. BARTLETT FOR TED FARLEY C. P.• Swan referenced 2/25/77 memorandum received from the Director of Public Works which describes this resubdivision of five parcels into three parcels. Parcel 3 does not have access to Park Road and easements would be required for Parcel 3 access to Park Road through Parcels 1 and 2. Mr. Swan stated that in his opinion easements should provide access to each of the individual living units which.would be built at a future date, and should be wide enough to provide access to a garage. The Director. of Public Works would require new sewer laterals as well as new water services at the time of development. It was recommended that Commission approve the tentative map subject�to conditions that access be prohibited to E1 Camino Real, and that.access easements be granted to Parcel 3 across Parcels 1 and 2.' Chm. Taylor requested review of this particular property by the C. P. C.P. Swan stated this vacant land is composed of five 7ots,�two fronting on E1 Camino Real and three fronting on Park Road. There had been an application for a project with one building and a tentative map had been approved to combine all five lots into one parcel.� The final parcel map was never adopted. This new map is to combine the lots into three parcels because zoning regulations limit each parcel to having one residential building. The applicants have a design in mind whereby one residential building would be located on each of these three parcels. The C.E. had recommended there be no access to E1 Camino. Mr. Swan noted that Commission packet included a letter from Fire Chief Fricke regarding townhouse type condominiums. In the opinion of the Fire Dept. this type of project should be classified as Group H(apartment house) occupancy. Tonight's application, however, is simply consideration of the tentative parcel map. C. E. Kirkup explained that tentative parcel map procedure is to approve the lot configuration with P.C. requiring conditions, if any, which should be placed on the final map. In response to the question, could apartments be built on each lot, staff replied yes but in order to issue a building permit there must be a location on a particular parcel. The parcel map must be approved first. The C. E. pointed out that in this particular case, since there are five lots at present, the applicants could not build across lot lines. � C. Kindig suggested Commission condition the tentative parcel map with a requirement for easements. Mr. Singer told the P.C. their attorney was working on all cross easemen�s necessary but they had not thought this would be necessary for tonight's meeting. C. Sine suggested continuing this item to the next study meeting in March if the applicants felt they had adequate time to do so. h1r. Farley indicated it was their plan to submit full plans for the March 14 meeting. C. Kindig thought Commission could continue the map to March 14 and plans could be heard for study at the same time. C. Mink determined there were two existing curb cuts on E1 Camino Real, and C. E. Kirkup commented that according to code the driveways on E1 Camino must be closed before establishing new driveways. Discussion continued regarding procedure after which Chm. Taylor announced this tentative parcel map would be continued to the meeting of March 14, 1977. It was noted the lots in question are all R-3 lots at the present time, having been rezoned in the recent past. ;,,,� ,'� - ,. . , , .. � VA R IANCE Application to the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Burlingame l. 2. 3. � Date filed 2/23/77 ��� Study meeting 2/14/�� . Public hearing 2/28/77� ' � Action APPLICANT , t�': A. Name Anza Shareholders' Liquidating Trust - B. Address 433 Airport Blvd . City_ Burlingame Zip 94010 Telephone 342-5711 � _ x... PROPERTY � - �� � � `�,: � ,, A.. .Address .� :828-888 Airport� Blvd � � B. Legal Lot #1 -�"�- � � � .Block #1 �.- .� .- Description: Subdivision Ma ' � #4 ' �- ' P C. Assessar's parcel number (APN) 26-342-260• ��� ' ��' Zone C-4 '� D. Existing land use and improvements pff;ce war ho��. bLild�in�s "' VARIANCE REQUESTED . -, . �, � ' Lot size �below required size - (17,177 �sqft) � � 4. SITE PLAN See panel,map submitted.by H. Hickey, C..E. � , Attach site plan, drawn to scale, showing all existing and proposed major improvements, located by dimension from,property lines and adjacent structures. Sidewalks and curbs (if any) on public right-of-way should also be shown. Include building elevations, if relevant. � 5. ITEMS SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION: � P,uthorization by property owner. applicant Title report showing proof of ownership (except for R-1 & R-2 property) X Affidavit for Variance. attached . previously submitted�. N/A Site plans, elevations and�exhibits. ' � X Fee: ($40 for application on R-1 or R-2 property) ($75/for other zoning districts) � Receipt o� Z Zs� Received by �2 , , I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true.and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature Date + ' M � \ i � f t ` � APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT FOR VARIANCE LEGAL tZE(�UIREMENTS FOR VARIANCE B. A. Has applicant read Chapter 25.54 of the City Ordinance Code? Yes X No Describe the exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable �- � to your property which do not generally apply to other properties in your area, anc? the extent to �ahich you may deserve special consideration to which your neighbors are not entitled. - Propertv�developed �nd bui-ldinqs built prior to adopt�ion of'present ..r . lot• sizel rectuirements. � � • • • � • C. Describe why the variance is necessary now to preserve the continued use and enjoyment of the property. To�file a parcel ma� and comply with state.r.map act requirements._ , � �.,, , � • D. :What hardships would result if your request were denied? Could not leqal3,v sell� 828� Airport� BoLlevard }�i,i lc3ing_ � ; � IS APPLICANT THE LEGAL OWNER OF THE PROPERTY? Yes X No IF NO, INCLUDE.THE FOLLOWING: A. Owner's name B. Owner's address C. Attach signed statement from property owner declaring knowledge o� � and agreement to this variance application.