The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About835 Airport Blvd - Staff Report 2.10.2003sJ . � '� � {: :.. : � � .� �.�y � _ Item # Action Meeting City of Burlingame Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to Exceed 1.0 Floor Area Ratio and Conditional Use Permit to Vary from Bayfront Design Guidelines for Lot Coverage For a Courtyard Enclosure at the DoubleTree Hotel Address: 835 Airport Boulevard Meeting Date: 02/10/03 Request: Conditional use permit amendment to exceed 1.0 floor area ratio and conditional use permit to vary from the Design Guidelines for Bayfront Development for lot coverage for a courtyard enclosure at 835 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4. Applicant: Bruce Carlton, Doubletree Hotel APN: 026-343-430 &-440 Property Owner: Today's III, Inc. Lot Area: 4.77 Acres (207,659 SF) Architect: Gumbinger/Avram Associates Burlingame Bayfront Specific Area Plan: Restaurants/Hotels Zoning: C-4 Section: 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class 1(e)(2), Additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF, and if all public facilities are available for maximum development permissible in the general plan, and the site is not in an environmentally sensitive area. Adjacent Development: Offices, Hotels, and former City of Burlingame Sanitary Landfill site. Previous Use: 392-room hotel with meeting room facilities. Proposed Use: Enclose interior courtyard with a roof structure Allowable Use: Hotels with meeting room facilities History: On November 26, 2001, the Planning Commission approved a mitigated negative declaration, conditional use permit amendment, conditional use permit and parking variance to allow the construction of a singe-story meeting room space addition to the DoubleTree Hotel. The DoubleTree Hotel is an 8- story, 392-room hotel located at 835 Airport Boulevard. The hotel has 9,645 SF of banquet/meeting room space and received approval on November 26, 2001, to add an additiona14,372 SF of banquet/meeting space to the north and south sides of the building, increasing the total banquet/meeting room space to 14,017 SF. Building pernuts were not issued for this proj ect within the year following the approval, so the applicant applied for, and was granted, a one-year extension in November 2002, to December 3, 2003. The meeting room addition would increase the floor area ratio of the hotel from 1.14 to 1.16 FAR. A conditional use permit for floor area ratio is required for an FAR between 1.0 and 2.0. A conditional use permit for floor area was approved. Since the approval for the meeting room space addition has been extended, the current proposal to enclose the courtyard is being reviewed with the assumption that the meeting room space will be constructed. If the meeting room addition is built along with this proposal for the courtyard enclosure, the floor area will increase and requires a conditional use permit amendment for FAR between 1.0 and 2.0. The lot coverage would also increase from 23.6% to 25.5% which is a variation from the Design Guidelines for Bayfront Development which establishes a maximum lot coverage between 20-25% for all buildings over 50 feet in height. Please see the table below for more information. Conditional Use Permit and Conditional Use Permit Amendment 835 Airport Blvd. Summary: The applicant, Bruce Carlton General Manager of the DoubleTree Hotel, is proposing to enclose an existing interior courtyard with a roof structure. The courtyard is located in the middle of two eight-story buildings on the east and west side, a three-story building on the north side, and a one story building on the south side. The courtyard is currently open to the sky which limits year round because of weather. The applicant is proposing to enclose the 3,849 SF space with a glazed roof structure that would create a year-round atrium. The maximum height of the structure would be 23 feet at its center, as measured from adjacent grade. The enclosed space that would be created with the addition of the roof structure would allow year-round use of the courtyard space and would enhance the use of the existing adjacent spaces. The proposed courtyard enclosure would add 3,849 SF of floor area, increasing the floor area ratio from 1.16 to 1.18. A conditional use permit is required for floor area between 1.0 and 2.0 in the C-4 zoning district and a variance is required for FAR exceeding 2.0 (C.S. 25.41.090 and C.S. 25.41.025( fl). This proposed increase in floor area is considered a conditional use permit amendment to the previously approved conditional use permit in 2001 for FAR between 1.0 and 2.0 for the meeting room addition. The courtyard enclosure also increases the lot coverage on the site by 3,849 SF to 25.5% where 25% is the maximum for buildings over 50 feet in height. The existing lot coverage (with meeting room addition) is 23.6%(49,171SF). A conditional use permit for variation from the Design Guidelines for Bayfront Development is required for lot coverage exceeding the maximum allowed. The parking requirement for hotel use is one parking space for each hotel room. A parking variance was granted in 2001 for 265 on-site parking spaces and 127 spaces on an adjacent parcel, where 392 on-site spaces are required. Since this proposal does not add guest rooms to the hotel or take away existing parking, there is no additional parking required. Property Development Standards: Table 1 shows the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Bayfront Development Design Guidelines as they relate to this project. The table reflects the proposed courtyard enclosure with existing conditions on the site without the construction of the meeting room addition (approved in November 2001, extended to 2003), as well as the resulting changes with the construction of the approved meeting room addition. In summary, the project requires the following permits: Amendment to conditional use permit: ■ to exceed the floor area ratio allowed in the C-4 zone (1.18 FAR proposed where 1.0 FAR is the maximum allowed without a conditional use permit) (C.S. 25.41.025, �. Conditional use pernut: to vary from the lot coverage requirements of the Design Guidelines for Bayfront Development for 25.5% lot coverage where 25% is the maximum lot coverage allowed (23.6% existing, 25.5% proposed, 25% maximum). � Conditional Use Permit and Conditional Use Permit Amendment 835 Airport Blvd. C-4 Pro er Develo ment Standards and Desi n Guidelines or Ba ront Develo ment EXISTING PROPOSED . PROPOSED ` ALLOWED/ Q' w ADD N� W/O MTNG RM W/ MTNG RM � D ADDTN ADDTN SETBACKS: Front: No change 30 ;> bldg. ht. - from Anza Blvd. 74'-9" 81'-6" (89'-2") &> 2 Appt. Width of bldg. (88') Rear:- from Public 66'-5%2" 73-9" No change 25' Park.• LANDSCAPING: G4 District 27.5% of 27.9% of No change 15% of Land Area Requirements Land Area Land Area (31,148 SF) (57,109 SF) 57,986 SF Bayfront no change 950�o No change 80% of Front Guidelines - Front Setback Setback Bayfront 9% of Parking 9.2% of Parking No change 10% of Parking Guidelines Area (9281 SF) Area (9524 SF) Area - ParkingArea (10,304 SF ) VIEW OBSTR UCTION o � From Airport no change 4° No change 60% Blvd. o � From Anza Blvd. no change 5° No change 60% LOT COVERAGE 23.6% 23.4% 25.5%1 25% HEIGHT & BULK Bayfront 16'-6" 99'-0" No change 50'-0" Maximum Guidelines - (mechanical) Building Height 89'-2" (roo fl Bayfront Specific No change 392 Rms./4.767 No change 65 room per acre Plan - Densities Ac. = 82.2 rooms/acre (310 rooms) Conditional Use Permit and Conditional Use Permit Amendment 835 Airport Blvd. FAR 1.16 FAR 1.16 FAR 1.18 FARz ' 1.0 FAR (240,781 SF) (236,409 SF) (207,659 SF) PARKING Space 265 spaces 277 spaces No change 1 space/room = 392 Requirement Space Dimensions Stndard - 214 �a No change Compact - 50 (19%) Compact — 43 Disabled — 8 * Existing non-conforming ' Conditional use permit to vary from the lot coverage requirements of the Design Guidelines for Bayfront Development for lot coverage (25.5% proposed, 25% maximum allowed). Z Conditional use permit amendment to exceed the floor area ratio allowed in the C-4 zone (1.18 FAR proposed where 1.0 FAR is the maximum allowed). Staff Comments: See attached. Planning staff would note that approval of the glass roof for the courtyard enclosure (atrium) does not include the previous action to expand the first floor at the meeting room portion of the hotel. Planning Commission reviewed an extension to that action earlier in 2002 and if a building permit for the project to expand the first floor is not received by the property owner before November 26, 2003 the approval will expire. January 27, 2003 Study Meeting: At the January 27, 2003 Planning Commission study meeting, the Commission had no concerns with the proposal and placed this item on the consent calendar for the next meeting. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Pertnit the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution and should include findings for the conditional use permit amendment and conditional use permit. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. Please note that the conditions below which are in italics are mitigation measures taken from the negative declaration, the conditions of approval from the 101-room addition (approved by Planning Commission on May 27,1997), conditions of approval from the controlled access to parking and valet parking (approved by Planning Commission on April 12, 1999), and conditions of approval from the proposed first floor meeting room 4 Conditional Use Permit and Conditional Use Permit Amendment 83S Airport Blvd. space addition. The new conditions placed on this proposal are the first three in regular type. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped January 6, 2003, sheets A1-1, A2-1, A2-2, and A3-1, site plan, floor plan and building elevations; • 2. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal and Chief Building Official 's January 13, 2003 memos shall be met; 3. that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame; 4. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped July 16, 2001, sheets AI-0, A2-1, A3-1 and A3-2 and sheet A1-1, date stamped November 19, 2001; S. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal 's April 16, 2001 memo and Recycling Specialist's April 16, 2001 memo shall be met; 6. that the traffic allocation for a 101- room addition and 4,372 SF meeting room space addition to an existing 291-room hotel (82.2 room/acre density) which is a part of the planning approval of this project and the agreement for use of 127 parking spaces on the adjacent sanitary landfill shall run with the conditional use permits and shall expire at the same time the planning approval expires on the project; 7. that since the applicant has elected to provide a significant portion of its required parking by seeking an agreement with the City to share a parking area as described in the project, before issuance of any building permit under this project approval, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City thatprovides that the applicant will be allowed to use the Cityproperty to the north and west for parking for at least 127 vehicles so long as the applicant's property is used as a hotel or the required parking is not provided in some other way approved by the City; if that agreement is terminated for any reason, the applicant shall either reduce its usage to eliminate the need for the 127 parking spaces or provide alternative parking approved by the City; 8. that the proposed structure will be built on driven piles to mitigate potential settlement problems and earth shaking in a major earthquake; 9. that any connections between the new structure and the existing structure shall be designed to meet all the seismic requirements of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code and California Fire Code; 10. that flexible joints shall be installed on all utilities to reduce potential problems associated with ground settlement; 11. that the finished floors for any structure shall be at least 9' above the mean sea level or one foot above the possible flood elevation, whichever is greater; 5 Conditional Use Permit and Conditional Use Permit Amendment 835 Airport Blvd. 12. that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site will be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Eliminatzon System (NPDES) standards; 13. that any new construction on the site shall elevate the entry level to habitable floor levels to at Zeast 9 feet above the mean sea level or one foot above the possible flood elevation, whichever is greater; 14. that this project shall comply with the requirements of the state-mandated water conservation prog�am, that a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan shall be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application, and shall be approved by the City's Senior Landscape Inspector prior to issuing a building permit; 1 S. that the site shall be periodically sprayed with water to control dust during grading and construction; 16. that the developer shall be required to get appropriate permits from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and construction equipment emissions shall be in compliance with their standards; 17. that all construction shall be limited to the hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal Code, and no piles shall be driven before 9: 00 a.m. on Saturday, and none shall be driven on Sunday; 18. that the City shall require that the constr�uction contractorpredrill holes (iffeasible based on soils) and equip pile drivers with shields, and shall also develop a schedule for pile driving to minimize the impacts on the existing DoubleTree Hotel facilities, the Red Roof Inn and Red Rock Cafe; 19. that the hotel addition shall be built so that the interior noise level in all rooms does not e�ceed 45 dBa; 20. If any prehistoric or historic archeological relics are discovered during construction, all workwill be halted until the finding can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as determined by qualified experts, can be implemented; 21. that the controlled access parking plan shall be built and implemented as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped February 19, 1999, Sheet PK-1, and the installation shall conform to all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 22. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's September 28, 1998 and March 2, 1999 memos and the City Engineer's March 8, 1999 memo shall be met; 23. that a fee may be charged for self-park visitors at a rate of up to $1.00 for the first two hours, $2. 00 for 2 to 4 hours and $9. 00 for over four hours, and any change to this fee shall be reviewed by the city at a public hearing; 24. that any change to the number of parking spaces provided on site, thezr configuration and/or the operation of the parking controls shall require amendment to this use permit; � Conditional Use Permit and Conditional Use Permit Amendment 835 Airport Blvd. 25. that any change to the operation of the controlled and/or valet parking affecting the fee charged, the area used, or the traffic controls shall require amendment to this use permit; 26. that prior to use of the City landfill parking lot for paid valet or paid self-parking, the hotel shall obtain an amendment to the Shared Parking and License Agreement with the City to reflect this use; 27. that the use permit shall be reviewed annually for the first three years (April 2000, 2001, 2002) to assess the impact ofpaid valet and selfparking on City landfill parking and parking on adjacent streets and properties, and /or upon complaint; 28. that the hotel shall report to the city twice a year in 6 month intervals the number of cars which have parked longer than 24 hours and are not registered hotel guests and the use permit shall be reviewed if more than 10% of the on-site parking spaces are employed for this duration; 29. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped April 14, 1997, Sheet AO through All, and that the landscape plans shall be reviewed for compliance with all city ordinances and approved by the SeniorLandscape Inspector before a building permit is issued; 30. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's November 18, 1996 and April 21, 1997 memos, and the Chief Building Inspector's November 12, 1996 and April 21, 1997 memos shall be met; 31. that small delivery trucks or vans with periodic deliveries may be on site during operating hours, and no trucks shall be stored or parked on site continuously throughout the day or overnight; 32. that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame; 33. that the overall height of the 101-room addition as measured from the grade at the first floor (9'-6" elevation) shall be 84'-6%'; and the height to the top of the elevator shaft and mechanical room shall be 99'-0';• 34. that no room in the hotel shall be leased to a single individual, company or corporate entity for more than 29 days and no rooms and/or any part of the building shall be leased for permanent residential purposes; 35. that in the future, as required, the developer shall participate in an assessment district formed to provide an east-west transit connection to CalTrain, SamTrans, Greyhound and/or any other intercity transit opportunities for employees and guests as well as providing an on-site transit/commute coordinator, perhaps in conjunction with other employers in the area, to facilitate employees' trips to work and reduce peak hour trips generated by the hotel; 36. that the site shall be landscaped with vegetation which requires a minimum offertilization andpest control, and the maintenance of such landscaping shall follow the procedure established by a qualified landscape architect and approved by the city for fertilization and pest control; 7 Conditional Use Permit and Conditional Use Permit Amendment 835 Airport Blvd. 37. that the applicant shall implement a valet parking plan for the transition period between occupancy of the new hotel rooms and completion and availability of at least I1 S spaces in the proposed shared use parking lot on the sanitary landfill site; 38. that the project shall meet the requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers; 39. that in order to minimize settlement of roadways and other site features, recompacting surcharging the artificial fill material should be done before any paving; 40. that when the level-of-service reaches LOSD, the city shall convert the northbound through lane on Airport Boulevard at Anza Boulevard to a second exclusive left-turn lane. This improvement will improve cumulative conditions during the p.m. peak hour at this intersection to an acceptable LOS D(V/C=0.85), and the applicant shall pay a fee at that time toward the cost of this improvement, in proportion to the project's contribution to the total increase in traffic through the intersection; 41. that payment of a Bayfront Development Fee to the City of Burlingame for impacts in the Anza area shall be required in order to pay the proportional share for improvements which would mitigate cumulative impacts of this and otherprojects on area circulation, one-half due at the time of application and one-half due before asking for a final framing inspection; 42. that the proposed Anza Boulevard driveway access shared with the future park shall be widened from its current proposed width of 20 feet to a minimum width of 36 feet; a stop sign shall be provided at the driveway to control access on to Anza Boulevard from the shared parkingfacilities at the public park; 43. that the project sponsor shall continue to provide an airport shuttle service to all hotel guests, which shall include connections to Caltrain to accommodate employees at shift changes; and 44. that no portion of the required parking on site or on the landfill shall be used for long-term airport parking as part of a hotel promotion. Catherine Barber Planner c: Bruce Carlton, DoubleTree Hotel, applicant Noemi Avram, Gumbinger/Avram Associates, architect : ROUTING FORM DATE: January 8, 2003 TO: _City Engineer Chief Building Offiicial �Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist _City Arborist _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for an amendment to a conditional use permit, conditional use permit to exceed 1.0 floor area ratio and conditional use permit to vary from Bayfront Design Guidelines with 25.5% lot coverage where 25% is the maximum allowed to cover an existing interior courtyard at 835 Airport Blvd., zoned C-4, APN: 026-343-430 & 040. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, January 13, 2003 '�� C'�..Le�� , ��s � � ��.�:�.. � � .,n�+,�..�� Reviewed By: :�--- �'�� Date of Comments: ._,/ �� /a-� Z ROUTING FORM DATE: January 8, 2003 TO: City Engineer �Chief Building .Of�'icial Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist _City Arborist _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for an amendment to a conditional use permit, conditional use permit to exceed 1.0 floor area ratio and conditional use permit to vary from Bayfront Design Guidelines with 25.5% lot coverage where 25% is the maximum allowed to cbver an existing interior courtyard at 835 Airport Blvd., zoned C-4, APN: 026-343-430 & 040. STAFF RE'VIEW: Monday, January 13, 2003 � f b�. �1� ov� �l��-- ��srs�i�� co .�s,�--�ve�c�.. �o cd' �r�.,,. t� /�Z s Reviewed By: Date of Comments: d _ City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes • does the area measures, is done on the go-carts have oil separators in for oil spills need to be met, explain how; January 27, 2003 ES • unique usea,,�t�Burlingame, explain noise level - can noise be c�ed to one area, can noise be moni�� for the protection of employees and customexs, _ at the increase in noi�e�t property • application states that air will be 10.0° re circulated every hour, can this be er'ified; and • are there additional constr-u tion� res that will be taken on the wa 1-a jacent to the track to prevent the go-car-t -s�'f`rom going through the walls should someone = as'h. This item w s,set�" for the regular action calendar when all the info ation has been submitted and reviewed by t�.i�-,.Plaing Department. This item concluded at 7:20 p. 2. 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, ZONED C-4 - APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FLOOR AREA EXCEEDING 1.0, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR VARIATION FROM THE BAYFRONT DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR LOT COVERAGE FOR A PROPOSAL TO ENCLOSE AN EXISTING INTERIOR COURTYARD. (BRUCE CARLTON, DOUBLETREE HOTEL, APPLICANT; NOEMI AVRAM AIA, ARCHITECT; TODAY'S IIL 1NC., PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Planner Barber presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked is a landscaping variance is required, table shows existing landscaping below the required amount. Staff responded that a landscaping variance was previously granted for this site, and that this proposal does not affect landscaping and no additional landscaping is required. This item was set for the regular action calendar. This item concluded at 7:25 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the�sent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted simultaneously unless separate-'�ascussaon and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member. tlie public or a commission.er� - raor to the time the commission votes on the motion to ado ,t:�''"�� Acting Chair� o�u�'�e's asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commissi� ished to call any item off the �fr,�. . consent;:calendar. C. Brownrigg requested that item number 3b�,,� Drake Avenue, be moved to the action calendar. 3a: � 1456 CABRILLO AVENUE — ZONED R-��,,�PLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW TWO-STORY, SINGLE FAMILY�� ING WITH DETACHED GARAGE �,,,0�' APPLICANT AND PROPERTY O , JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN AND��GINE [� A NEW MILLER, NG INC.; C. Auran moved ap,pr, val of item 3a. on the consent calendar, 1456�.�brillo Avenue, based on the facts in the staff report ommissioners comments and the findings i�n h�"s aff reports with recommended conditions in the staff p�rt and by resolution. The motion was s�o�ided by C. Keele. Acting Chair Bojues called for a voic , ote on the motion to approve and it passe�-�0-3 (C. Osterling, Keighran and Vistica absent). Appea procedures were advised. � 2 City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 www.burlingame.or.g ��' CITT �� - . - � BURUNf3AME APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION . : �,�...�•' Type of application: Design Review Conditional Use Permit X Variance X Special Permit Other. Parcel Number: Project address: APPLICANT Name: Bruce Carlton* Address: 8 p,i r�ort $p 7� PVAYd City/State/Zip: Burlingame. CA 94010 Phone(w): (650) 373-2200 (h):_ (650) 344-4931 (fl:_ (650) 340-8851 PROPERTY Name: Today' s II I� Inc Address:_ 835 Airport Boulevard City/State/Zip: Burlincrame CA 94010 Phone(w): (650) 373-2260 (h): (650) 373-2266 (fl:_ (650) 373-2295 ARCHITECT/DESIGIITER Name: Noemi Avram AIA Address: 6 p F, ml, ; rr� A # 0 0 City/State/Zip: San Mateo. CA 94401 Phone(w): (650) 579-0995 �h)� (�:_ (650) 579-1402 Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cover existina interior courtyard with a roof structure. AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: �— �—�� Date: %- 3- v� � I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commissi . � . Property owner's signature: � Date: I-�- c� 3 � � �,' � � �/ � �te submitted: JA�V - 6 2003 PCAPP.FRM CITY OF �3URLIfVGAME PL;�NNING DEPT. ui�iu�u� r�xi 15:16 FAg 650 540 8851 Sent 8y: CITY OF BURLYNGAME PLANNXNG; 'IN�'� .�'G: ',I�W�:�.:.`�,SY t�: iv�n..�Y `�:.��N.^ ��' � ..:`. .: """11>TFyI yw y` : /y� �� ^`*u....... , l.�.' �� r.��'� V, .w �+*��Y'w: iv.w.... :: . ..... ' ��2.. n V.�yrt DOUBLETREE HOTEL SFO 650 696 3790; Jan-9•03 3:51Pki; � r.i;_. , �......._ ` . . .._._..__ . �.nwa�..._._ ^.^ .',i..w - _._. • aa I�j002 Page 2/3 _ � p�" GO�/�/L `1 CrL Th planning Commission is requi�ed b aw to make findings as defined by ihe City's Ordinance (C ' de Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the followina questions can asslst the Planning �`-' C mission in making the decision as t�o whether the findings can be made for you� request, PI 'ase type or write neat►Y in i�k. Refer to the back of this form for assistgnce with these au' stions, X. Z. � �' ExplQin why the proposed ust Q1 the pmposcd Iocc�tion will nat b� dstrimentul or i�jurious eo property or improve►nents in the victnity ar to pub�ic health, s�/'ety, gener�al we�are, or convenience. The proposed project coupled with the November 2001 approved project (extended until November 2003) would prdvide 25.5$ lot coverage vs. bayfront design guidelines of 25$. The proposed project is a change of existing space. Historic use of the existing space during "fair weather" has not been detrimental to public health, safety, gener�.l welfare or convenience. How wiU the proposed use be IucalQd arid conducted in accordance with the Burlingame General Plari and Zoning Q�diaanceP A conditional use permit £or 25.5� lot coverage vs. bayfront design quidelines 25� lot coverage is requested. How wil[ �Ita proposed p%%ett b6 colt3Pcttibls with the aesthetics, rnass, bulk a.�d �h�.�ccer of rhe existiRg aied po�eRttcl usas on a�jouweg prnpt�iies fa the gensral' vic�'aily� , Project roofli.ne is below existxng three story winy visible fxom 1�nza Boulevard (south) only. Nv skyline/sightline change will occur. Project will enhance existing facility by providing a year-round "atrium". Nv impact on parking/traffic versus history will occur as project only enhance5 use of existing space by making it available on a year round basis. Project provi.des hotel with•improved "meet and eat" opportunity vn a year round basis. e�p�FneIIlI98 _ u��lu�ua rxi is:i7 r�nx s5o s4o 8851 DOLrBLETREE HOTEL SFO � 00� Sent By: CITY OF BUR�YNGAME PLANNING; 650 696 3790; Jan-8-03 3:51PM; Page 2/3 — - `:w�:: �" ..»,:,�::•�'...:�:�:< ' '�. ,:,,.:::;.,�.�::�::.:::,.:«;:.: ••..:�;:;;:::M� ' �`•.' � „«�;��.........l�. ',;�� '• .,,...... ,,,,,, . .::5:l�M. ""ti�wus'v�.`.i` ..AY��.�.�,` ln.....:..:�iN�V�,w:ew...�t�M�'�µM�✓.�5... ::.�,4V ��' i;+S,'p `ti,v�wYrN,�!"'' Kv"� R11t 4• (�{�e -+�rn::ro�x �NiWN•e•�+�1 1Ir � ��.�.: ..�Ww,l�ii:�!�� ' �i•w�sx ��iw ��`;,.,+��('MK�L.'�M/��'�.,.:;;..::�•��wyr.::...rwrr:%��IMM��w...«n i• ' :` a 1 Ij.wv..v..n.nwMW�� ':::i..N�� '•,��.v'.�..�` �1;wv�\�. � �/'{ ...:ii.: ;.....:,i;7, i r i �i.Yi' a n• w � �A �� v� .,,,...._.: ,MU�,�:.i��EE�„M,��F;�i�l�.��L�� `:.�,�'.� : �'-��". .,.,c,....:.,...�iG'C�.11�,.�:,.�i�� ',�.. �w� .T ��:•��:..:... ��,.;:�.... ,w�,,.,..,��,.� • .. �'I��w"h+nNS�:'4Nfr��wv��iw.w:..�.w'M!.�+.\ •MI.IMIp ..�,�: • ��v� `��, �,'•�� «�rwwv�,M��;.:. �.ir.n«w�x !� ��a•o::: �ii`.� i�. ��to'make findings es detined by the City's Ordina�ce Th' Plann�ng Cummissinn is required by �aw (G de Sectio� 25.52.020). Your answers to the follawing questions can assist the Plann�ng �� C mission in making the decision as to whethe� the findings can be made for your request, PI �sse type or write ne�tly in ink. Refer to the bsck of this farm for assistance with these qu' stions, Y, � Tsxplain why tha proposed u�� at the proposed toconon wi[I not be d�trimental o� ii{jr�riorss to p�ppartj► er v�,provtments in [he vici�tity or to public h�al�h, s�t�Y► gene�I we�an, or eonveni�nee. The propvsed project wil� increase the hoteaceswhich willVmake�it project scope involves covering exist�ng sp usable on a year-round basis. Historic�use of the existing space during "fair weather" has notlbWelfareroreconvenienceurious to , public health, safety, genera Z, �� How wiU the p►�posBd usa b� k►caled and eoredueted ire neeondaRea with tha Surlimgo�ne Gerearal Pla,� and Zoning 4�inanceP _. ! .� we are requesting a conditional use permit with regard to FAR (zoning code and bsyacensodthatnisuusableeon�yeaxeround�basis��ect enhances existing p ,f,l'ow will the pmposed project be tom,patible t+'ltlt the aisth�tics, tnass, bulk a�d el+ura�cter o,f the erisqr�,E a�d po�ential usss oa adjouwea propertias iR ehs gtneral vidnicy� Project roofline i�the�onlexisNo skyli.ne/sightlinegchangelwil��occur. Anxa Boulevard (sou 1 Y oviding a year�round Project will enhance ex�s�ing facili�y by p� "atrium". No impact on parking/traffic versus h�story w�ll occur as project only �nhances usprofeC��srovidesahotel withnimprovedilable on a year xound basis. ] P . "meet and eat" opportunity on a year round basis. ��1rr�e � City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2001 east property line within the 1'-0" setback from the left side property line to the proposed driveway; and 6) that the proj ect shall meet all the re _� ements of the California Building Code and - ornia Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amende -d�-t e City of Burlingame. The motion was nded by C. Mink. Comment on the mot' �. the top of this house is important t' design, now that it has been chopped off o� Y'see the end of the sloped roof, it wil e a big difference if the �� is visible, wou�ld as'k to amend the motion to require nrs'h to the roof so that the flas rng is not visible. ��Keighran, maker of the motion,� . Mink, second, agreed that�i-amendment to roof flashing be added to �hairman Vistica called for a. ice vote on the motion to a�q�e the project with the height f�'31 feet and with a conditio�n a�e roof top/edge be finished-in such a way that the flash�i �oes not show. The motion� �se�d on a 6-0-1 (C. Bojues a:bsent). Appeal procedures wer�.r�C'dvised. This item concluded �,tB:OS p.m. -''r ,;�" ,.�� . - �i°.:� �'.,�'' Chai �''Vistica noted that agenda�Item 6, 1208 Cortez Avenue, had;been moved to be the first action item and was heard 7. in the meeting. He infor,�fr�red interested members of the audience that this item had been approved. 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD — ZONED C-4 — APPLICATION FOR NIITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLAR.ATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXCEED 1.0 FLOOR AREA RATIO, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO VARY FROM THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS, AND PARKIlVG VARIANCE FOR A SINGLE-STORY MEETING ROOM SPACE ADDITION (PAUL ZEN, TODAY'S III, INC., APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; GUMBINGER/AVRAM ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT) (15 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report, 11.26.01, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Forty-one conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked if there was a condition requiring compliance with NPDES drainage requirements, including petroleum separators. Staff noted that condition 9 addressed this issue. There were no other questions from the commission. Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Paul Gumbinger, architect, and Peter Marshal, General Manager of the Double Tree Hotel, represented the project. They noted that this is a request for 4,000 SF of ineeting space to allow the hotel to have a meeting in one room while setting up luncheon for the attendees in another room, hotel needs it to compete in this tough market; when preparing the detailed landscape plan requested counted 112 trees on the site, will remove 5 and replace those with 6; when hotel was built the applicant paid the city $831,600 to build the parking lot on the top deck at Bayside Park and pays an annual $27,000 license fee to maintain that lot, this allows the hotel to use 127 of the parking spaces to supplement on site parking for the hotel; most of the conditions attached are repeats, the protected catch basins were installed in the parking lot originally; the hotel's airport shuttles are parked in the driveway close to the entrance and do not occupy required parking spaces. Commissioners asked: was parking on-site at the hotel a problem before the controls were installed in 1999. General Manager responded it was hard to say, could not recall a time when they had an 0 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2001 on-site parking problem, if there was on,k it was rare, if we know we are going to have a large event on site we use more valet parking. There were no further questions from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners comments: this is one property with a unique agreement with the city for• shared parking; the location next to the city's landfill restricts their landscaping alternatives, favor request because of the positive interaction. C. Osterling noted that the addition is well designed and will fit in, he appreciated seeing,,the accurate landscape drawings, trees are shown where they are, glad adding more than you are removing, and incorporating the comments made by applicant and commission, moved approval by resolution, of the negative declaration, conditional use permit, amendment to the conditional use permit and parking variance with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped July 16, 2001, sheets Al-0, A2- 1, A3-1 and A3-2 and sheet Al-1, date stamped November 19, 2001; 2) that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's Apri116, 2001 memo and Recycling Specialist's April 16, 2001 memo shall be met; 3) �hat the traffic allocation for a 101- room addition and 4,372 SF meeting room space addition to an existing 291-room hotel (82.2 room/acre density) which is a part of the planning approval of this project and the agreement for use of 127 parking spaces on the adjacent sanitary landfill shall run with the conditional use permits and shall expire at the same time the planning approval expires on the project; 4) that since the applicant has elected to provide a significant portion of its required parking by seeking an agreement with the City to share a parking area as described in the project, before issuance of any building permit under this proj ect approval, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City that provides that the applicant will be allowed to use the City property to the north and west for parking for at least 127 vehicles so long as the applicant's property is used as a hotel or the required parking is not provided in some other way approved by the City; if that agreement is terminated for any reason, the applicant shall either reduce its usage to eliminate the need for the 127 parking spaces or provide alternative parking approved by the City; 5) that the proposed structure will be built on driven piles to mitigate potential settlement problems and earth shaking in a major earthquake; 6) that any connections between the new structure and the existing structure shall be designed to meet all the seismic requirements of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code and California Fire Code; 7) that flexible joints shall be installed on all utilities to reduce potential problems associated with ground settlement; 8) that the finished floors for any structure shall be at least 9' above the mean sea level or one foot above the possible flood elevation, whichever is greater; 9) that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site will be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and petroleum separating drains should be regularly maintained by the property owner and should be inspected annually by the City for compliance;l0) that any new construction on the site shall elevate the entry level to habitable floor levels to at least 9 feet above the mean sea level or one foot above the possible flood elevation, whichever is greater; 11) that this project shall comply with the requirements of the state-mandated water conservation program, that a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan shall be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application, and shall be approved by the City's Senior Landscape Inspectorprior to issuing a building pernut; 12) that the site shall be periodically sprayed with water to control dust during grading and construction; 13) that the developer shall be required to get appropriate permits from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and construction equipment emissions shall be in compliance with their standards;l4) that all construction shall be limited to the hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal Code, and no piles shall be driven before 9:00 a.m. on 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2001 Saturday, and none shall be driven on Sunday; 15) that the City shall require that the construction contractor predrill holes (if feasible based on soils) and equip pile drivers with shields, and shall also develop a schedule for pile driving to minimize the impacts on the existing DoubleTree Hotel facilities, the Red Roof Inn and Red Rock Cafe; 16) that the hotel addition shall be built so that the interior noise level in all rooms does not exceed 45 dBa; 17) If any prehistoric or historic archeological relics are discovered during construction, all work will be halted until the finding can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as determined by qualified experts, can be implemented;l8) that the controlled access parlcing plan shall be built and implemented as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped February 19, 1999, Sheet PK-1, and the installation shall conform to all the requirements' of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 19) that the conditions of the Fire � Marshal's September 28, 1998 and March 2, 1999 memos and the City Engineer's March 8, 1999 memo shall be met; 20) that a fee may be charged for self-park visitors at a rate of up to $1.00 for the first two hours, $2.00 for 2 to 4 hours and $9.00 for over four hours, and any change to this fee shall be reviewed by the city at a public hearing; 21) that any change to the number of parking spaces provided on site, their configuration and/or the operation of the parking controls shall require amendment to this use permit; 22) that any change to the operation of the controlled and/or valet paxking affecting the fee charged, the area used, or the traffic controls shall require amendment to this use permit; 23) that prior to use of the City landfill parking lot for paid valet or paid self-parking, the hotel shall obtain an amendment to the Shared Parking and License Agreement with the City to reflect this use; 24) that the use permit shall be reviewed annually for the first three years (April 2000, 2001, 2002) to assess the impact of paid valet and self parking on City landfill parking and paxking on adj acent streets and properties, and /or upon complaint; 25) that the hotel shall report to the city twice a year in 6 month intervals the number of cars which have parked longer than 24 hours and are not registered hotel guests and the use permit shall be reviewed if more than 10% of the on- site parking spaces are employed for this duration; 26) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped April 14, 1997, Sheet AO through Al l, and that the landscape plans shall be reviewed for compliance with all city ordinances and approved by the Senior Landscape Inspector before a building permit is issued; 27) that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's November 18, 1996 and April 21, 1997 memos, and the Chief Building Inspector's November 12, 1996 and Apri121, 1997 memos shall be met; 28) that small delivery trucks or vans with periodic deliveries may be on site during operating hours, and no trucks shall be stored or parked on site continuously throughout the day or overnight; 29) that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame; 30) that the overall height of the 101-room addition as measured from the grade at the first floor (9'-6" elevation) shall be 84'-6%2", and the height to the top of the elevator shaft and mechanical room shall be 99'-0"; 31) that no room in the hotel shall be leased to a single individual, company or corporate entity for more than 29 days and no rooms and/or any part of the building shall be leased for permanent residential purposes; 32) that in the future, as required, the developer shall participate in an assessment district formed to provide an east-west transit connection to CalTrain, SamTrans, Greyhound and/or any other intercity transit opportunities for employees and guests as well as providing an on-site transit/commute coordinator, perhaps in conjunction with other employers in the area, to facilitate employees' trips to work and reduce peak hour trips generated by the hotel; 33) that the site shall be landscaped with vegetation which requires a minimum of fertilization and pest control, and the maintenance of such landscaping shall follow the procedure established by a qualified landscape architect and approved by the city for fertilization and pest control; 34) that the applicant shall implement a valet paxking plan for the transition period between occupancy of the new hotel rooms and completion and . City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2001 availability of at least 115 spaces in the proposed shared use parking lot on the sanitary landfill site; 35) that the project shall meet the requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 36) that in order to minimize settlement of roadways and other site features, recompacting or surcharging the artificial fill material should be done before any paving; 37) that when the level-of-service reaches LOS D, the city shall convert the northbound through lane on Airport Boulevard at Anza Boulevard to a second exclusive left-turn lane. This improvement will improve cumulative conditions during the p.m. peak hour at this intersection to an acceptable LOS D(V/C=0.85), and the applicant shall pay a fee at that time toward the cost of this improvement, in proportion to the project's contribution to the total increase in traffic through the intersection; 3 8) that payment of a Bayfront Development Fee to the City of Burlingame for impacts in the Anza area shall be required in order to pay the proportional share for improvements which would mitigate cumulative impacts of this and other proj ects on area circulation, one-half due at the time of application and one-half due before asking for a final framing inspection; 39) that the proposed Anza Boulevard driveway access shaxed with the future park shall be widened from its current proposed width of 20 feet to a minimum width of 36 feet; a stop sign shall be provided at the driveway to control access on to Anza Boulevard from the shared parking facilities at the public park; 40) that the proj ect sponsor shall continue to provide an airport shuttle service to all hotel guests, which shall include connections to Caltrain to accommodate employees at shift changes; and 41) that no portion of the required parking on site or on the landfill shall be used for long-term airport parking as part of a hotel promotion. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Comment on the motion: Second noted that condition 9 should include the requirement that the petroleum separating drains should be regularly maintained by the property owner and should be inspected annually by the City for compliance. The maker of the motion agreed to the amendment to the condition. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with the amendment to the conditions that the petroleum separating drains should be regularly maintained and inspected annually for compliance. He noted that this is a good proj ect, sharing parking with the park means that there is less impervious surface in the area and there is more visible open space. The motion passed on a 6-0-01(C. Bojues absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:35 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW S. 3030 HILLSIDF,r�SRIVE — ZONED R-1— CONSTRUCT�ON PERMIT AND SPECIA DWELLII�G WITH AN ATTACHED G� DESIGN REVIEW, FOR A NEW, TWO-S �IDE AREA 1LE FAMILY DA�1V.bOD AND BATOUL JAMS�IIIDNE� AS�SOCIATES DESIGNER . �}NOTICEI �. CP Monroe briefly, e'sented the project de: action shall no� �taken until all of the City � if this hous�s the first lot as you go GE (KENNETH ROBY, ALA�D,,��I�OMES, APPLICANT; ►D, PROPERTY OWNE .-�; R�ZANOROUZI, MEMAR�'I� i PROJECT PLA�1�R CATHERINE KEYLON,,�"� y�,,.�' �;or. � � ripti�; an'd noted that the project is herej,, r" study, but final � irieer's comments have been address d:� Commission ask� driveway, what is the required i��ss and egress for the,�ots at the��ar of this steeply slopir�g!eCriveway and how will the Fire De�arEment gain access to t's site. Cyo�mission also asked �w a� the required rear setback, looks like�here is a deck over 30",�� fhe rear. Commission noted 3..c�`"garage, but asked how many uncovered��aces can be accommodat�'d on the site since visitors �iil-not be able to park on Hillside Drive. H� the applicant going to ad�ress damage to 0 RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT AMENDMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a conditiorial use permit arnendment to exceed 1.0 floor area ratio and conditional use permit to vary from the Design Guidelines for Bavfront Development for lot coverage for a courtvard enclosure at 835 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4, Today's III , Inc., property owner,.APN: 026-343-430 & 026-343-440; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on February 10, 2003, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINE�D by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class 1(e)(2), Additions to existing structures provided that the addition will not result in an increase of more than 10,000 SF, and if all public facilities are available for maximum development pernussible in the general plan, and the site is not in an environmentally sensitive area. 2. Said conditional use pernut amendment and conditional use permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use permit amendment and conditional use permit are set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. � CHAIRMAN I, Ralph Osterlin�, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the lOth day of February, 2003 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of, approval for categorical exemption, conditional use permit amendment and conditional use permit. (conditions in ita.lics are carried over from previous approvals on the site) 835 Airport Boulevard effective February 18, 2003 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Deparirnent and date stamped January 6, 2003, sheets Al-1, A2-1, AZ-2, and A3-1, site plan, floor plan and building elevations; 2. that the conditions of the Fire Maxshal and Chief Building Official 's January 13, 2003 memos shall be met; 3. that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all the requirements of the California'�titi��i�g �nd Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame; 4. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped July 16, 2001, sheets AI -0, A2-1, A3-1 and A3-2 and sheet � AI -1, date stamped November 19, 2001; S. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's April 16, 2001 memo and Recycling Specialist's April 16, 2001 memo shall be met; 6. that the traffic allocation for a 101- room addition and 4,372 SFmeeting room space addition to an existing 291-room hotel (82.2 room/acre density) which is a part of the planning approval of this project and the agreement for use of 127 parking spaces on the adjacent sanitary landfill shall run with the conditional use permits and shall expire at the same time the planning approval expires on the project; 7. that since the applicant has elected to provide a significant portion of its required parking by seeking an agreement with the City to share a parking area as described in the project, before issuance of any building permit under this project approval, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City that provides that the applicant will be allowed to use the City property to the north and west for parking for at least 127 vehicles so long as the applicant's property is used as a hotel or the required parking is not provided in some other way approved by the City; if that agreement is terminated for any reason, the applicant shall either reduce its usage to eliminate the need for the 127 parking spaces or provide alternative parking approved by the City; 8. that the proposed structure will be built on driven piles to mitigate potential settlement problems and earth shaking in a major earthquake; 2 Exhibit A- Conditions of approval 835 Airport Boulevaxd February 18, 2003 9. that any connections between the new structure and the existing structure shall be designed to meet all the seismic requirements of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code and California Fire Code; 10. that flexible joints shall be installed on all utilities to reduce potential problems associated with ground settlement; I1. that the finished floors for any structure shall be at least 9' above the mean sea level or � one foot above the possible flood elevation, whichever is greater; 12. that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site will be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standc�rd�,;. _�_, � r _ .. . - . �.,_ ..f 13. that any new construction on the site shall elevate the entry level to habitable floor levels to at least 9 feet above the mean sea level or one foot above the possible flood elevation, whichever is greater; 14. that this project shall comply with the requirements of the state-mandated water conservation program, that a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan shall be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time ofpermit application, . and shall be approved by the City's Senior Landscape Inspector prior to issuing a building permit; 1 S. that the site shall be periodically sprayed with water to control dust during grading and construction; 16. that the developer shall be required to get appropriate permits from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and construction equipment emissions shall be in compliance with their standards; � � 17. that all construction shall be limited to the hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal Code, and no piles shall be driven before 9: 00 a.m. on Saturday, and none shall be driven on Sunday; I8. that the City shall require that the construction contractor predrill holes (if feasible based on soils) and equip pile drivers with shields, and shall also develop a schedule for pile driving to minimize the impacts on the existing DoubleTree Hotel facilities, the Red Roof Inn and Red Rock Cafe; 19. that the hotel addition shall be built so that the interior noise level in all rooms does not exceed 45 dBa; 3 Exhibit A- Conditions of approval 835 Airport Boulevard February 18, 2003 20. If any prehistoric or historic archeological relics are discovered during construction, all work will be halted until the findzng can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as determined by qualified experts, can be implemented; 21. that the controlled access parking plan shall be built and implemented as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped February 19, 1999, Sheet PK 1, and the installation shall conform to all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 22. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's September 28, 1998 and March 2, 1999 memos and the City Engineer's March 8, 1999 memo shall be met; 23. that a fee may be charged for self-park visitors at a ra�e t�f up to $1.00 for the first two hours, $2.00 for 2 to 4 hours and $9. 00 for over four hours, and any change to this fee shall be reviewed by the city at a public hearing; 24. that any change to the number of parking spaces provided on site, their configuration and/or the operation of the parking controls shall require amendment to this use permit; 25. that any change to the operation of the controlled and/ot- valet parking affecting the fee charged, the area used, or the traffic controls shall require amendment to this use permit; 26. that prior to use of the City landfill parking lot for paid valet or paid self-parking, the hotel shall obtain an amendment to the Shared Parking and License Agreement with the City to reflect this use; 27. that the use permit shall be reviewed annually for the.first three years (April 2000, 2001, 2002) to assess the impact of paid valet and self parking on City landfill parking and parking on adjacent streets and properties, and /or upon complaint; 28. � that the hotel shall report to the city twice a year in 6 month intervals the number of cars which have parked longer than 24 hours and are not registered hotel guests and the use permit shall be reviewed if more than 10% of the on-site parking spaces are employed for this duration; 29. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped April 14, 1997, Sheet AO through All, and that the landscape plans shall be reviewed for compliance with all city ordinances and approved by the Senior Landscape Inspector before a building permit is issued 4 Exhibit A- Conditions of approval 835 Airport Boulevard February 18, 2003 30. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's November 18, 1996 and April 21, 1997 memos, and the Chief Building Inspector's November 12, 1996 and April 21, 1997 memos shall be met; 31. that small delivery trucks or vans with periodic deliveries may be on site during operating hours, and no trucks shall be stored or parked on site continuously throughout the day or overnight; 32. that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame; � 33: that the overa�=herght of the 101-room addition as measured from the gf-ade at the first floor (9'-6" elevation) shall be 84'-6%'; and the height to the top of the elevator shaft and mechanical room shall be 99'-0';• 34. that no room in the hotel shall be leased to a single individual, company or corporate entity for more than 29 days and no rooms and/or any part of the building shall be leased for permanent residential purposes; 35. that in the future, as required, the developer shall participate in an assessment district formed to provide an east-west transit connection to CalTrain, SamTrans, Greyhound and/or any other intercity transit opportunities for employees and guests as well as providing an on-site transit/commute coordinator, perhaps in conjunction with other employers in the area, to facilitate employees' trips to work and reduce peak hour trips generated by the hotel; 36. that the site shall be landscaped with vegetation which requires a minimum of fertilization an� pest control, and the maintenance of such landscaping shall follow the procedure established by a qualified landscape architect and approved by the city for fertilization and pest control; 37. that the applicant shall implement a valet parking plan for the transition period between occupancy of the new hotel rooms and completion and availability of at least I1 S spaces in the proposed shared use parking lot on the sanitary landfill site; 38. that the project shall meet the requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 39. that in order to minimize.settlement of roadways and other site features, recompacting surcharging the artificial fill material should be done before any paving; 5 Exhibit A- Conditions of approval 835 Airport Boulevard February 18, 2003 40. that when the level-of-service reaches LOS D, the city shall convert the northbound through lane on Airport Boulevard at Anza Boulevard to a second exclusive left-turn lane. 1'his improvement will improve cumulative conditions during the p.m. peak hour at this intersection to an acceptable LOSD (V/C=0.85), and the applicant shall pay a fee at that time toward the cost of this improvement, in proportion to the project's contribution to the total increase in tra�c through the intersection; 41. that payment of a Bayfront Development Fee to the City of Burlingame for impacts in the � Anza area shall be required in order to pay the proportional share for improvements which would mitigate cumulative impacts of this and other projects on area circulation, one-half due at the time of application and one-half due before asking for. a final framing inspection; 42. that the proposed Anza Boulevard driveway access shared with the future park shall be widened from its current proposed width of 20. f'eet to a minimum width of 36 feet; a stop sign shall be provided at the driveway to control access on to Anza Boulevard from the shared parking facilities at the public park; 43. that the project sponsor shall continue to provide an airport shuttle service to all hotel guests, which shall include connections to Caltrain to accommodate employees at shift changes; and , 44. that no portion of the required parking on site or on the landfill shall be used for long- term airport parking as part of a hotel promotion. C , . . .. \ r : � . . .. , , : . , , , , ------_.-- , . . .... . .. :.: : ... ; . . . .. ..,. .. .. `,c�'� T o*`' CI.TX OF BURLINGAME , .:` . .. ' . : ' e ,RLJN¢AM6 P�NNING.'DEPARTMENT s • � • . 5b7;PFtIMRl�3E ROAp ,. BURL(NGAfVIE, GA 94010 . ' , � . �:. w.• TEL (650) 55$ Z25Q : . ' ; `Site 835 Afxport Blvd � � . . ; . ,, , . . .,� ; , . , _ � Applicatiort for"� conditio�ai wse permit amendment� . � �� for floor area exceedirag 1 Q and conditidnal use,,; ' , ' ,• � permit for va�ia#iort frorn the Ba y fr qrtit besign • �;� � - Gwde�rnes for iot coverage fora proposat to enc�osei .. : PUBLIC; HE/QIRING ' '�' an exlsting mterior ��%irtyard:at 835 l�irport glvd ; � �:�zoned;C 4 (ARN 026=343 430 & 026-343-440).. . ` NOTIC:E " ' � � . . �. ; ;, ... . . : ,. ; - � . . The City of Burlmgame Planning Commission . � `�� antiounces the;follow'ing public hearing on:Monday, � CITY�OF BURLI .NGAIVIE. �. : � � February 10, 2003 at:7 00:P;M., in #he City H�II : � .. � �' � Council Chambers located at 501. Primrose Road, � �� Burlin.game, California. � � A copy of the.apphc ' a� . a� ay be reviewed pr�or `. . � � � to , the meeting a s� la .' ent 1 Primrose Road; Mailed: �Jenuary 31, ;2003 . . Burlingaine; Cal' � . If you chal, , ge.: � , u ma be liiiuted:to:: !Please refento.other,scde)`:� ' ,. raising onl+ os ssu�s; d e:` bhc hea�xrig,` . _ ... : . i .:: desc�ibed,i :' c e . d fo the �iry.: . . at or pndr t' i � � : . ,- .� A �.. 1. °; � � Property o ers � �x 1 � � � : ` .tenants; ab t tlii no , � 558 7250. ank` u' ' i : e� : �� ' t ,. . �'' ` : �,, . � . ' Margaret o�� City Planner . ;'�� . , �� PU ,, . , �: , : :; � . ` ``, (Please refer to. other sade) ` . ., �> R, �t �j (' ii � � nsi.. or �i ornung the�r mformat�a �p�e e call: .(,650) : . . . ��: . � , �� ,=� :ICE:.; . . � C � � c !)S��'' t+,..�� i i�.z,'::i ..as�;..�� - � �� ? ��;,"`�,��t�� ,� � � �� a'�� . '�`��s��'��h a;t �. �r��a�� a � , � a��W� MM � � �� v �� .ti. `^� � �:: � ;A..,� . '�'S, ;�?; . .-:.'t� � ` €� �g%' : � ^�y -v,. � m ' 1" .� �rac� � € ,. a � .. S�•; �'' . a °k'+�i � ,� *A. ,t�a., „+a. �� .unr �.,�: i ` '"` j�l,�'� ' `� -0 "zM %k�' ��'i "'U : �n�y�8`"£` �r � . � �l ^�.',°. ,Fn.,....__ r a ,'�' tt � �j�'��'�`�� '� '� �».�`�, •,�� s�� `�� 5 �� A �i . � � , k �� '�i� F :.� �: � �5 �,� F�eA4 �."N'. �� .� x. 's� .� � � �� s - E� k:6 � `: � Ps `9 ..� �- � ' t � �� , r r� � � ,� �i� s a � a�'� �' �... ��,� S �s�.� d�.-. r�a� � e". � �` �'.e� '�.;��'��•.. � � ;� "� �v''�� -: �� . ��..� � " �' ., '�i+} , � .x � { �° �� :>��'��. c�� "��`� � b„^ "�.. �: e� n,a. t, ` "" ` � �;�� r� � �a�� '�•'"� `�+. . �aw, d aj a ^� � �'� � � ��4; � ,� ''` t ��# � '�< i ., ,��g � {� ,�e '� . � �.� �s1 �''k'y'� t 'r p �,e��r/��' P -� u � � �,' � �-� �. � � �� f _��¢�� 3++. ,, y �,'�� r � _ ��.� ` . �, ` �,a�+ ., ��i�' ,�.�*„Y'�� `�� . �.i ��y�� ,; r ��" M - `�� x� . � ��H �, � *�'�`i^" ��"�&� � - e i '� "R ' i� '� ��q 'x: � i� � � � � "�'j ��. „� r �' J '�� 3 �� , �'B x a:. - � �/ �� r,�ti^�� i� s � � � 4 .: � �� q.,� ��, �. a � �" � �1� �-0 ,. v. 6 -. .� . . s�'�" ,KKf�, t � ` � ,� � R � �nk-� "�,.�d�� ',w�� sa ` � ,�� ,�" � � � � .� � � � � � '' � 't i � �" ,� �` r� . s �,�"` � t �� '� i � � � - .� 4' '` � x� '` `� -� - ''�h�� 4a �� '� �t�`''"� r �'�, � �'`"��'c� " ;� �� x� °� �� ` � *�� ` i � �� &y�' _ � � � � '. C ' ''�'' ' . / j�Al � b +�n^g' Y .. ,{ . � °� � � C, a{v��a kr ' '� .. } .. -d � ,� .. 1its. k � � � A d° �� 1 •� 5 s. 5 , � @ � A"� o: 2#� ,� r F � tl ,�w, „ �. 't }�{ � \ ' yp h� ;, $} /��, � �'' � �� . �� "Y x;� J�.a` �� M^ � � i "� �:i � �' .� °� .�..-:` � � �� ". ��.� �� `� ,� ,c*``'"`" t �� a� � '� ro§��N, '"-� �,� " �' � � ; r . �y, r �� 8 � � ,� u' -�� s�'� �, "'� � .: t�`,"'�,"� a� . � .. �.�, .� �� b �'�` 1} �` � � � ° � J; � "� � �, +, $ , +�.r �e �s ��'� '" �'T�;"tA �4t �'� ' �,�.�5 � "�Y,F � � .: ,.. � � t� ! , y, , : .�� y. < <a , + h � ��' �.�� R• �a# � . ��i''�f� � � �� ..rr�� L � � � 1 .+%� .� � �", � � A�� b A"�, y 1" ,� 6 R" �� , �'.. �+Y �� p� �"&.,3�wk '�� ,4 _+y,� ys � '�.��n ?l ,� .`�` �}�py ... . '� �' �� .,,e, r. �ti :� �G� . :�x�� a.. w. � � `yrs�� . . °' � �,� � ��/ ia v a $3 � �.. a � �'� � ��a8� *•*' � x �4° ✓ � �,+ I'� `�'y �1 "�� t � v�,,. rs � �-0 �� " � - y � .3�, .� . � €� � ',� r,� � � � �- � � � �'� � � �' �� ,y�,,r �� '� �� ,��l�` a � �.. � � � a,z'��"' �'. � � . �� i � � "� � � ,� r .:_ i q t �z � �::. '^t'� � - � !'tik "»�e�^�`'' �'iMi�� a� ' .e',� y� �' ��, �, d'o-° : � �` �� ' '� . : �. � i ��f :z ��, a ' �' ' =��' "��+�a � ,. � � � �� ,.�.. �' � � � w �. �� :, Y �s � � z J � �'�.✓°b� ; � � d° , a �� ' f ',� s s�i�%, � � ;�y � <. � s#' t � � �' ��y.k . �,.AYp ,.x � `./_/ .� � 4. s � :.J � � i y3(4 :^�''� � �`" �� w ,'u..�� k �' T ✓� � ,f # ih �;,� �'�, .. ' k n / �� *� � " x � �� l: � � :,r' ." '� a 98� ^'y' Sil� � �'`� * � � `�� "' ,R�s ;� . rSk � ` � �`� z : , 'F a.c .� * � � � � I a sM '.�` �;.', { � `g "�Y < �,��.�. '�� s� �-:E t e - �: '� ' • �' ,��Z. o �,x � ✓ a�4;� �'►�� . c;7' ;� � ,t •..,, f� �" �� ' �',"��:wo �a� ,F .,�� r � � �, �.+ " �� S' �' '� ' -, � "1�" i 2 s � � '�x, ,� �� ,' , ,� � . � '�r .� 's�,r � �, � a ` � � �r a S ^ � y - � � r� � � ��Y r��. �.."S �q �q"��,q+'�+ y� •'O�'` ; � r�v. f�.�i. �k� �'�tr.:rs �.ys v ,� � i.�..xs+� s dqa '+'*K laa, �� g%� �d 4 � . �' Y .� ., �,.' � "'?� t, 'k a i � s$ �,' .��.;r. �p, s,�, ��..�1 , i°il'. ..� � � j ,Rt' .`"x`c.. �:^„r �, � �si � �': �� .�q-: � P �� , ,�' t -' - � . %. . a� � � ,� I�11( .. � �� • ^�.. w �at^� rc�e . „ � �. � 4. � � �III � �, ° e 9� .,�, n,u�,, , ` � � � ,� � ' � �i ��% , a»� a 3��, � � x� ��;a ,� � � � g� . *� �� ; � � � � '�," �,' � �� >. �� `"`a* - �' ' ti , � '' � `� �. �, "°�a-;*nx f" r�- -: a�.�;: ' +.. �� sya � �= � �'� ��° ; ,�� ' � ; � � / ��,,, � a � � ,� � � � �� ,�� ,"��, �, ,� '� �� _ . .. . ;� t �e � �, `�" �, � ..'"� s z �i � r �, . � . � � �� , ,� �� w��^��u � '� ��c � "F � � � � �.a'4.w,�g.�,�,�, �..�. ; � a�.�r��z � > . , y. _ - q . ,> -� . , i � -'�' m_ �,�s . �, _ �re�'�. ' tY� ^'-f � , .�,'�`" d ,� w`�"�� .t � .,� h'� � .�, ,, m.�.;��,°i „��,.F'� ? .. .ue„ � � �