Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout835 Airport Blvd - Staff Report 11.25.2002.� � City of Burlingame One Year Extension of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Conditional Use Permit, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Yariance Address: 835 Airport Boulevard (DoubleTree Hotel) Meeting Date: 11/25/02 Request: One year extension of an approved mitigated negative declaration, conditional use permit to exceed 1.0 floor area ratio, conditional use permit amendment to vary from the parking area landscaping requirements (9% proposed, 10% minimum required), and parking variance for 265 on-site parking spaces where 392 spaces are required for a single-story meeting room space addition at 835 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4. Item #3t. Consent Calendar APN: 026-343-430 & -040 Lot Area: 4.77 Acres (207,659 SF) Burlingame Bayfront Specific Area Plan: Restaurants/Hotels Zoning: C-4 Adjacent Development: Offices, Hotels, and former City of Burlingame 5anitary Landfill site. CEQA Status: Negative Declaration No. ND-518P Applicant: Paul Zen, Today's III, Inc. Property Owner: same as applicant Architect: Gumbinger/Avram Architects Previous Use: 392-room hotel with meeting room facilities. Proposed Use: Addition of 4,372 SF of ineeting facilities to an existing hotel. Allowable Use: Hotels with meeting room facilities. Summary: The applicant is applying for a one year extension of an approved mitigated negative declaration, conditional use permit, conditional use permit amendment and parking variance for a single-story meeting room space addition for the DoubleTree Hotel at 835 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4, approved on November 26, 2001(November 26, 2001 Planning Commission Minutes). Reduced-sized plans of the approved proj ect were submitted along with the request for an extension. The following applications were approved by the Planning Commission in November, 2001: • Conditional use permit to exceed the floor area ratio allowed in the C-4 zone (1.16 FAR proposed where 1.0 FAR is the maximum allowed without a conditional use permit) (C.S. 25.41.025, �; Conditional use permit amendment to vary from the landscape requirements of the Design Guidelines for Bayfront Development for landscaping within the parking area (9.2% existing, 9% proposed,l0% required); and • Parking variance for number of parking spaces (265 on-site parking spaces provided, 127 spaces provided on an adjacent parcel, where 392 spaces are reQuired on-site). The Planning Commission approval of this application became effective on December 3, 2001. This approval is valid for a period of one year during which time a building permit must be issued. An extension for up to one year to December 3, 2003, may be considered by the Planning Commission. If the extension is not granted, the applicant must reapply. In a letter dated November 5, 2002, the applicant notes that because of the recent downturn in the economy and a decision by the property owner to delay all maj or capital expenses and investments, the applicant would like to now request a one year extension of the meeting room addition approval. ,� , t One Year Extension ofMitigated Negative Declaration, Conditional Use Permit, 835 Airport Boulevard Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Yariance The Proj ect: The applicant, Today's III, Inc., is proposing to construct a single-story addition to the existing 8-story, 392-room DoubleTree Hotel located at 835 Airport Boulevard. The site is located on the southwest corner of Airport and Anza Boulevards, and is adjacent to the City of Burlingame community park to the west. Currently, the hotel has 9,645 SF of banquet/meeting room space. The project includes adding 4,372 SF of banquet/meeting room space to the north and south sides of the building, and would increase the total banquet/meeting room space to 14,017 SF. The proposed addition would increase the floor area ratio of the hotel from 1.14 to 1.16 FAR. A conditional use permit for floor area ratio is required for an FAR between 1.0 and 2.0. In this case the addition will increase the project FAR to 1.16, which will require a conditional use permit, not an amendment since a conditional use permit for FAR was not included with the approval in 1997 of the 101-room addition (1.14 FAR). The parking requirement for hotel use is one parking space for each hotel room (392 rooms), which results in a requirement of 392 parking spaces for this project. In 1997, the Planning Commission approved a parking variance for 277 on-site parking spaces where 392 spaces are required. The 1997 parking variance was based on the applicant providing 115 parking spaces for hotel employee and guest use in the additional parking area provided on adjacent city land. The enlarged parking area also serves the city's Bayside Community Park including a driving range, soccer field and baseball diamond. A net of 12 on-site parking spaces would be lost to accommodate the meeting room additions, reducing the total number of on-site parking spaces to 265. Planning staff would note that field visits by the applicant and staff verified that there are currently 230 parking spaces in the adjacent lot. To offset the decrease in the number of parking spaces on the hotel site, the applicant recently requested, and was granted, an extension of the license agreement for use of an additional 12 parking spaces in the adjacent public park parking lot. The 230-space parking lot at the recreation area would provide parking for both hotel guests and visitors to the 36-acre recreation area. In addition, the hotel provides valet parking in the northeast corner of the hotel site lot. Vehicles are parallel- parked at the end of the parking stalls. This valet parking will accommodate approximately 14 to 16 additional vehicles on the hotel site. The results of the parking and traffic analysis indicate that the proposed meeting room 4,372 SF meeting room addition is not projected to create a shortage of parking spaces for a peak weekend or weekday. An analysis of the recreational facility parking demand indicated that sufficient parking is available to accommodate the parking demand from the meeting room addition and from the recreational facilities. A total of six new trees will be planted: one new tree will be planted adjacent to the south end addition and five new trees will be planted adjacent to the north end addition. Ground cover will also be added around the addition areas. Approximately 834 SF of landscaping will be removed within the hotels' parking area and 591 SF of new landscaping will be added, resulting in a net reduction of 243 SF in landscaping. The landscaping in the parking area will be decreased from 9.2% (9524 SF) to 9% (9281 SF). With the 101-room addition in 1997, a conditional use permit was granted for 9.2% landscaping within the parking area where 10% (10,304 SF) is required. This was a reduction from 11.3% (11,600 SF). An amendment to the conditional use permit is required to vary from the landscape requirements of the Design Guidelines for Bayfront Development for landscaping within the parking area (9.2% existing, 9% proposed,l0% required). !� One Year Extension ofMitigated Negative Declaration, Conditional Use Permit, 835 Airport Boulevard Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Yariance Table 1- C-4 Pro er Develo ment Standards and Desi n Guidelines or Ba ront Develo ment EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ'D Front Setback: 30 ;> bldg. ht. (89'-2") - from Anza Blvd. 81'-6" 74'-9" &> 2 Appt. Width of bldg. (88') Rear Setback: 73-9" 66'-5'/2" 25' - from Public Park: LANDSCAPING: G4 District 27.9% of Land Area 27.5% of Land Area 15% of Land Area Requirements (57,986 SF) (57,109 SF) (31,148 SF) Bayfront Guidelines - 95% no change 80% of Front Setback Front Setback Bayfront Guidelines 9.2% of Parking 9% of Parking Area' 10°/a of Parking Area - ParkingArea Area (9524 SF) (9281 SF) (10,304 SF ) VIEW OBSTRUCTION From Airport Blvd. 4602 no change 60% From Anza Blvd. 52%2 no change 60% HEIGHT & BULK Bayfront Guidelines - 99'-0" (mechanical) 16'-6" 50'-0" Maximum Building Height 89'-2" (roo fl Bayfront Specific Plan - 392 Rms./4.767 Ac. no change 65 rooms per acre Densities = 82.2 rooms/acre (310 rooms) FAR 1.14 FAR 1.16 FAR3 1.0 FAR (236,409 SF) (240,781 SF) (207,659 SF) PARKING Space Requirement 277 spaces 265 spaces* 1 space/room = 392 Space Dimensions n/a Standard - 214 Compact - 50 (19%) Compact — 43 Disabled — 8 ' Conditional use permit amendment to vary from the landscape requirements ot"the llesign (iuidelmes tor Bayfront Development for landscaping within the parking area (9% provided, 10% required). z Existing nonconforming view obstruction. 3 Conditional use permit to exceed the floor area ratio allowed in the C-4 zone (1.16 FAR proposed where 1.0 FAR is the maximum allowed). * Parking variance amendment for number of spaces (265 proposed where 392 is the minimum required). �i One Year Extension oJMitigated Negative Declaration, Conditional Use Permit, 835 Airport Boulevard Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Yariance Negative Declaration: Mitigated Negative Declaration ND-518P for this project was approved by the Planning Commission and became effective for this project on December 3, 2001. The extension proposes no changes to the project and there have been no changes in the surrounding environment which would require additional environmental review. Therefore, this application is covered by the Mitigated Negative Declaration ND-518P. The mitigation measures in the negative declaration are incorporated into the conditions of approval. Planning Commission Action to Extend the Permit to October 3, 2003: The Planning Commission should review the request. The findings for granting the extension of the mitigated negative declaration, conditional use permits and parking variance would bc the same as the findings the Planning Commission made in their action of November 26, 2001 (P.C. Minutes November 26, 2001). At the meeting the following conditions should be considered for the one-year extension: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped July 16, 2001, sheets A1-0, A2-1, A3-1 and A3-2 and sheet A1-1, date stamped November 19, 2001; 2. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's April 16, 2001 memo and Recycling SpecialisYs April 16, 2001 memo shall be met; 3. that the traffic allocation for a 101- room addition and 4,372 SF meeting room space addition to an existing 291-room hotel (82.2 room/acre density) which is a part of the planning approval of this project and the agreement for use of 127 parking spaces on the adjacent sanitary landfill shall run with the conditional use permits and shall expire at the same time the planning approval expires on the proj ect; 4. that since the applicant has elected to provide a significant portion of its required parking by seeking an agreement with the City to share a parking area as described in the project, before issuance of any building permit under this project approval, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City that provides that the applicant will be allowed to use the City property to the north and west for parking for at least 127 vehicles so long as the applicant's property is used as a hotel or the required parking is not provided in some other way approved by the City; if that agreement is terminated for any reason, the applicant shall either reduce its usage to eliminate the need for the 127 parking spaces or provide alternative parking approved by the City; 5. that the proposed structure will be built on driven piles to mitigate potential settlement problems and earth shaking in a major earthquake; 6. that any connections between the new structure and the existing structure shall be designed to meet all the seismic requirements of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code and California Fire Code; 7. that flexible joints shall be installed on all utilities to reduce potential problems associated with ground settlement; : One Year Extension of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Conditional Use Permit, 835 Airport Boulevard Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Yariance that the finished floors for any structure shall be at least 9' above the mean sea level or one foot above the possible flood elevation, whichever is greater; 9. that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site will be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and petroleum separating drains should be regularly maintained by the property owner and should be inspected annually by the City for compliance; 10. that any new construction on the site shall elevate the entry level to habitable floor levels to at least 9 feet above the mean sea level or one foot above the possible flood elevation, whichever is greater; 11. that this project shall comply with the requirements of the state-mandated water conservation program, that a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan shall be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application, and shall be approved by the City's Senior Landscape Inspector prior to issuing a building permit; 12. that the site shall be periodically sprayed with water to control dust during grading and construction; 13. that the developer shall be required to get appropriate permits from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and construction equipment emissions shall be in compliance with their standards; 14. that all construction shall be limited to the hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal Code, and no piles shall be driven before 9:00 a.m. on Saturday, and none shall be driven on Sunday; 15. that the City shall require that the construction contractor predrill holes (if feasible based on soils) and equip pile drivers with shields, and shall also develop a schedule for pile driving to minimize the impacts on the existing DoubleTree Hotel facilities, the Red Roof Inn and Red Rock Cafe; 16. that the hotel addition shall be built so that the interior noise level in all rooms does not exceed 45 dBa; 17. If any prehistoric or historic archeological relics are discovered during construction, all work will be halted until the finding can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as determined by qualified experts, can be implemented; 18. that the controlled access parking plan shall be built and implemented as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped February 19, 1999, Sheet PK-1, and the installation shall conform to all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 19. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's September 28,1998 and March 2, 1999 memos and the City Engineer's March 8, 1999 memo shall be met; .� One Year Extension of Mitigated Negative Declaration, Conditional Use Permit, 835 Airport Boulevard Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Yariance 20. that a fee may be charged for self-park visitors at a rate of up to $1.00 for the first two hours, $2.00 for 2 to 4 hours and $9.00 for over four hours, and any change to this fee shall be reviewed by the city at a public hearing; 21. that any change to the number of parking spaces provided on site, their confguration and/or the operation of the parking controls shall require amendment to this use permit; 22. that any change to the operation of the controlled and/or valet parking affecting the fee charged, the area used, or the traffic controls shall require amendment to this use permit; 23. that prior to use of the City landfill parking lot for paid valet or paid self-parking, the hotel shall obtain an amendment to the Shared Parking and License Agreement with the City to reflect this use; 24. that the use permit shall be reviewed annually for the first three years (Apri12000, 2001, 2002) to assess the impact of paid valet and self parking on City landfill parking and parking on adjacent streets and properties, and /or upon complaint; 25. that the hotel shall report to the city twice a year in 6 month intervals the number of cars which have parked longer than 24 hours and are not registered hotel guests and the use permit shall be reviewed if more than 10% of the on-site parking spaces are employed for this duration; 26. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped April 14, 1997, Sheet AO through A1 l, and that the landscape plans shall be reviewed for compliance with all city ordinances and approved by the Senior Landscape Inspector before a building permit is issued; 27. that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's November 18,1996 and Apri121,1997 memos, and the Chief Building Inspector's November 12, 1996 and Apri121, 1997 memos shall be met; 28. that small delivery trucks or vans with periodic deliveries may be on site during operating hours, and no trucks shall be stored or parked on site continuously throughout the day or overnight; 29. that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame; 30. that the overall height of the 101-room addition as measured from the grade at the first floor (9'-6" elevation) shall be 84'-6%2", and the height to the top of the elevator shaft and mechanical room shall be 99'-0"; 31. that no room in the hotel shall be leased to a single individual, company or corporate entity for more than 29 days and no rooms and/or any part of the building shall be leased for permanent residential purposes; One Year Extension ofMitigated Negative Declaration, Conditional Use Permit, 835 Airport Boulevard Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Yariance 32. that in the future, as required, the developer shall participate in an assessment district formed to provide an east-west transit connection to CalTrain, SamTrans, Greyhound and/or any other intercity transit opportunities for employees and guests as well as providing an on-site transit/commute coordinator, perhaps in conjunction with other employers in the area, to facilitate employees' trips to work and reduce peak hour trips generated by the hotel; 33. that the site shall be landscaped with vegetation which requires a minimum of fertilization and pest control, and the maintenance of such landscaping shall follow the procedure established by a qualified landscape architect and approved by the city for fertilization and pest control; 34. that the applicant shall implement a valet parking plan for the transition period between occupancy of the new hotel rooms and completion and availability of at least 115 spaces in the proposed shared use parking lot on the sanitary landfill site; 35. that the project shall meet the requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 36. that in order to minimize settlement of roadways and other site features, recompacting or surcharging the artificial fill material should be done before any paving; 37. that when the level-of-service reaches LOS D, the city shall convert the northbound through lane on Airport Boulevard at Anza Boulevard to a second exclusive left-turn lane. This improvement will improve cumulative conditions during the p.m. peak hour at this intersection to an acceptable LOS D (V/C=0.85), and the applicant shall pay a fee at that time toward the cost of this improvement, in proportion to the project's contribution to the total increase in traffic through the intersection; 38. that payment of a Bayfront Development Fee to the City of Burlingame for impacts in the Anza area shall be required in order to pay the proportional share for improvements which would mitigate cumulative impacts of this and other projects on area circulation, one-half due at the time of application and one-half due before asking for a final framing inspection; 39. that the proposed Anza Boulevard driveway access shared with the future park shall be widened from its current proposed width of 20 feet to a minimum width of 36 feet; a stop sign shall be provided at the driveway to control access on to Anza Boulevard from the shared parking facilities at the public park; 40. that the project sponsor shall continue to provide an airport shuttle service to all hotel guests, which shall include connections to Caltrain to accommodate employees at shift changes; and 41. that no portion of the required parking on site or on the landfill shall be used for long-term airport parking as part of a hotel promotion. Ruben Hurin Planner c: Paul Zen, Today's III, Inc., applicant and property owner Noemi K. Avram, AIA, Gumbinger/Avram Architects, architect � �^ City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2001 Qa� east property line within the 1'-0" set k from the left side property line to the proposed driveway; Q�� �' / and 6) that the project shall meet all the r irements of the California Building Code and California �\ Fire Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the 'ty of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Mink. Co ent on the motion: the top of this house is i orta choppe ff one will see the end of the sloped roof, it w� visible, w d ask to amend the motion to require a finish visible. C. 'ghran, maker of the motion, and C. Mink, address the roo ashin� be added to the motion. to its design, now that it has been ke a big difference if the flashing is the roof so that the flashing is not ��d, agreed that an amendment to Chairman Vistica cal for a voice vote on the motion to approve the p� �',ect with the height of 31 `� fe t and with a conditio hat the roof top/edge be finished in such a way t� t the flashing does not sho . The motion passe n a 6-0-1 (C. Bojues absent). Appeal procedur were advised. This item ncluded at 8:05 p.m. � -r Chairman istica noted that agei� ���em 6, 1208 Cortez Avenue, had been moved to be the first regular actio item and was heard e ier in the meeting. He informed interested members of the audience that t's item had been approved. � 7. 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD — ZONED C-4 — APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXCE�D 1.0 FLOOR AREA RATIO, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO VARY FROM THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS, AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A SINGLE-STORY MEETING ROOM SPACE ADDITION (PAUL ZEN, TODAY'S III, 1NC., APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; GUMBINGER/AVRAM ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT) (15 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HLTRIN Reference staff report, 11.26.01, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Forty-one conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked if there was a condition requiring compliance with NPDES drainage requirements, including petroleum separators. Staff noted that condition 9 addressed this issue. There were no other questions from the commission. Chairman Vistica opened the public hearing. Paul Gumbinger, architect, and Peter Marshal, General Manager of the Double Tree Hotel, represented the project. They noted that this is a request for 4,000 SF of ineeting space to allow the hotel to have a meeting in one room while setting up luncheon for the attendees in another room, hotel needs it to competc in this tough market; when preparing the detailed landscape plan requested counted 112 trees on the site, will remove 5 and replace those with 6; when hotel was built the applicant paid the city $831,600 to build the parking lot on the top deck at Bayside Park and pays an annual $27,000 license fee to maintain that lot, this allows the hotel to use 127 of the parking spaces to supplement on site parking for the hotel; most of the conditions attached are repeats, the protected catch basins were installed in the parking lot originally; the hotel's airport shuttles are parked in the driveway close to the entrance and do not occupy required parking spaces. Commissioners asked: was parking on-site at the hotel a problem before the controls were installed in 1999. General Manager responded it was hard to say, could not recall a time when they had an 0 r City ofBurlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2001 on-site parking problem, if there was on, it was rare, if we know we are going to have a large event on site we use more valet parking. There were no further questions from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners comments: this is one property with a unique agreement with the city for shared parking; the location next to the city's landfill restricts their landscaping alternatives, favor request because of the positive interaction. C. Osterling noted that the addition is well designed and will fit in, he appreciated seeing the accurate landscape drawings, trees are shown where they are, glad adding more than you are removing, and incorporating the comments made by applicant and commission, moved approval by resolution, of the negative declaration, conditional use permit, amendment to the conditional use permit and parking variance with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped July 16, 2001, sheets A1-0, A2- 1, A3-1 and A3-2 and sheet A1-1, date stamped November 19, 2001; 2) that the conditions of the Fire Mazshal's April 16, 2001 memo and Recycling Specialist's April 16, 2001 memo shall be met; -- � 3) that the traffic allocation for a 101- room addition and 4,372 SF meeting room space addition to an existing 291-room hotel (82.2 room/acre density) which is a part of the planning approval of this project and the agreement for use of 127 parking spaces on the adjacent sanitary landfill shall run with the conditional use permits and shall expire at the same time the planning approval expires on the project; 4) that since the applicant has elected to provide a significant portion of its required parking by seeking an agreement with the City to share a parking area as described in the project, before issuance of any building permit under this project approval, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City that provides that the applicant will be allowed to use the City property to the north and west for parking for at least 127 vehicles so long as the applicant's property is used as a hotel or the required parking is not provided in some other way approved by the City; if that agreement is terminated for any reason, the applicant shall either reduce its usage to eliminate the need for the 127 parking spaces or provide alternative parking approved by the City; 5) that the proposed structure will be built on driven piles to mitigate potential settlement problems and earth shaking in a major earthquake; 6) that any connections between the new structure and the existing structure shall be designed to meet all the seismic requirements of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code and California Fire Code; 7) that flexible joints shall be installed on all utilities to reduce potential problems associated with ground settlement; 8) that the finished floors for any structure shall be at least 9' above the mean sea level or one foot above the possible flood elevation, whichever is greater; 9) that all runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site will be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and petroleum separating drains should be regularly maintained by the property owner and should be inspected annually by the City for compliance; 10) that any new construction on the site shall elevate the entry level to habitable floor levels to at least 9 feet above the mean sea level or one foot above the possible flood elevation, whichever is greater; 11) that this project shall comply with the requirements of the state-mandated water conservation program, that a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan shall be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application, and shall be approved by the City's Senior Landscape Inspector prior to issuing a building permit; 12) that the site shall be periodically sprayed with water to control dust during grading and construction; 13) that the developer shall be required to get appropriate permits from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and construction equipment emissions shall be in compliance with their standards; 14) that all construction shall be limited to the hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal Code, and no piles shall be driven before 9:00 a.m. on 7 e City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes November 26, 2001 Saturday, and none shall be driven on Sunday; 15) that the City shall require that the construction contractor predrill holes (if feasible based on soils) and equip pile drivers with shields, and shall also develop a schedule for pile driving to minimize the impacts on the existing DoubleTree Hotel facilities, the Red Roof Inn and Red Rock Cafe; 16) that the hotel addition shall be built so that the interior noise level in all rooms does not exceed 45 dBa; 17) If any prehistoric or historic archeological relics are discovered during construction, all work will be halted until the finding can be fully investigated and proper protection measures, as determined by qualified experts, can be implemented; 18) that the controlled access parking plan shall be built and implemented as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped February 19, 1999, Sheet PK-1, and the installation shall conform to all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1995 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 19) that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's September 28, 1998 and March 2, 1999 memos and the City Engineer's March 8, 1999 memo shall be met; 20) that a fee may be charged for self-park visitors at a rate of up to $1.00 for the first two hours, $2.00 for 2 to 4 hours and $9.00 for over four hours, and any change to this fee shall be reviewed by the city at a public hearing; 21) that any change to the number of parking spaces provided on site, their configuration and/or the operation of the parking controls shall require amendment to this use permit; 22) that any change to the operation cf.zh;; controlled and/or valet pazking affecting the fee charged, the area used, or the traffic controls shall require amendment to this use permit; 23) that prior to use of the City landfill parking lot for paid valet or paid self-parking, the hotel shall obtain an amendment to the Shared Parking and License Agreement with the City to reflect this use; 24) that the use permit shall be reviewed annually for the first three years (April 2000, 2001, 2002) to assess the impact of paid valet and self parking on City landfill parking and parking on adjacent streets and properties, and /or upon complaint; 25) that the hotel shall report to the city twice a year in 6 month intervals the number of cars which have parked longer than 24 hours and are not registered hotel guests and the use permit shall be reviewed if more than 10% of the on- site parking spaces are employed for this duration; 26) that the proj ect shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped April 14, 1997, Sheet AO through A11, and that the landscape plans shall be reviewed for compliance with all city ordinances and approved by the Senior Landscape Inspector before a building permit is issued; 27) that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's November 18, 1996 and April 21, 1997 memos, and the Chief Building Inspector's November 12, 1996 and Apri121, 1997 memos shall be met; 28) that small delivery trucks or vans with periodic deliveries may be on site during operating hours, and no trucks shall be stored or parked on site continuously throughout the day or overriight; 29) that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame; 30) that the overall height of the 101-room addition as measured from the grade at the first floor (9'-6" elevation) shall be 84'-6`/2", and the height to the top of the elevator shaft and mechanical room shall be 99'-0"; 31) that no room in the hotel shall be leased to a single individual, company or corporate entity for more than 29 days and no rooms and/or any part of the building shall be leased for permanent residential purposes; 32) that in the future, as required, the developer shall participate in an assessment district formed to provide an east-west transit connection to CalTrain, SamTrans, Greyhound and/or any other intercity transit opportunities for employees and guests as well as providing an on-site transit/commute coordinator, perhaps in conjunction with other employers in the area, to facilitate employees' trips to work and reduce peak hour trips generated by the hotel; 33) that the site shall be landscaped with vegetation which requires a minimum of fertilization and pest control, and the maintenance of such landscaping shall follow the procedure established by a qualified landscape architect and approved by the city for fertilization and pest control; 34) that the applicant shall implement a valet parking plan for the transition period between occupancy of the new hotel rooms and completion and : � � Crty of Burlingame Planning Commusion Minutes November 26, 2001 availability of at least 115 spaces in the proposed shared use parking lot on the sanitary landfill site; 35) that the project shall meet the requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 36) that in order to minimize settlement of roadways and other site features, recompacting or surchazging the artificial fill material should be done before any paving; 37) that when the level-of-service reaches LOS D, the city shall convert the northbound through lane on Airport Boulevard at Anza Boulevazd to a second exclusive left-turn lane. This improvement will improve cumulative conditions during the p.m. peak hour at this intersection to an acceptable LOS D(V/C=0.85), and the applicant shall pay a fee at that time toward the cost of this improvement, in proportion to the project's contribution to the total increase in traffic through the intersection; 38) that payment of a Bayfront Development Fee to the City of Burlingame for impacts in the Anza area shall be required in order to pay the proportional share for improvements which would mitigate cumulative impacts of this and other projects on azea circulation, one-half due at the time of application and one-half due before asking for a final framing inspection; 39) that the proposed Anza Boulevard driveway access shazed with the future park shall be widened from its current proposed width of20 feet to a minimum width of 36 feet; a stop sign shall be provided at the driveway to control access on to Anza Boulevard from the shared parking facilities at the public park; 40) that the project��:Y��r shall continue to provide an airport shuttle service to all hotel guests, which shall include connections to Caltrain to accommodate employees at shift changes; and 41) that no portion of the required parking on site or on the landfill shall be used for long-term airport pazking as part of a hotel promotion. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Comment on the motion: Second noted that condition 9 should include the requirement that the petroleum separating drains should be regularly maintained by the property owner and should be inspected annually by the City for compliance. The maker of the motion agreed to the amendment to the condition. Chairman Vistica called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with the amendment to the conditions that the petroleum separating drains should be regularly maintained and inspected annually for compliance. He noted that this is a good project, sharing parking with the park means that there is less impervious surface in the area and there is more visible open space. The motion passed on a 6-0-01(C. Bojues absent). AppeaI procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:35 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY E:� 3030 HILLSIDE DRIVE CONSTRUCTION PERM DWELLING WITH AN DAWOOD AND BATO �ONED R- — PLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA AND S CIA PERMIT FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY AC GARA E(KENNETH ROBY, ALADDIN HOMES, APPLICANT; A HIDNEH D, PROPERTY OWNERS; REZA NOROUZI, MEMARIE CP Monroe briefly pre en d the project des ription, and note at project is here for study, but final action shall not be taken until all of the City gineer's co ents have een addressed. Commission asked if this house is the first lot as you go down th drivewa hat is the req ired ingress and egress for the lots at the rear of this steeply sloping driveway will the Fire D artment gain access to this site. Commission also asked what is the required rear setback, looks like th e is a deck over 30" at the rear. Commission noted 3 car garage, but asked how many uncovered spaces c modated on the site since visitors will not be able to park on Hillside Drive. How is the applicant going to address damage to L� 6 i ROUTIlVG FORM �. ��. ( NI�L�-2 Cs�l�-2���. i��? I�� c..J ��p�. �ovc.� N��. � � � � �� a 2. � �-�, � � �S i�.u.�. �v�D �:� n��� � -� �� �.� P �� o � �-�sr� i� f� �. � �c � l c��S � , DATE: Apri116, 2001 TO: _City Engineer Chief Building Official �Fire Marshal Recycling Specialist _City Arborist _City Attorney FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for environmental review, parking variance and conditional use permits for meeting room addition to existing hotel at 835 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4, APN: 026- 343-430. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, April 16, 2001 ��_��_� � Reviewed By: Date of Comments: ROUTING FORM DATE: TO: FROM: Apri116, 2001 _City Engineer _Chief Building Official �ire Marshal J Recycling Specialist _City Arborist _City Attorney Planning Staff SUBJECT: Request for environmental review, parking variance and conditional use permits for meeting room addition to existing hotel at 835 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4, APN: 026- 343-430. STAFF REVIEW: Monday, April 16, 2001 Q << ��� -�77 .eyU_,,,j v� r� �� , C�� s�� w���� �,o���.� ����� M ��� ��,� c� s�-�.� �� � sfi ���� Reviewed By: Z�..J Date of Comments: i/ 6 v �;�� ��� � �� �� � 99144/2.7 November 5, 2002 Ms. Margaret Monroe City Planner City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Ms. Monroe: Project: Additions and Alterations to the: DoubleTree Hotel 835 Airport Boulevard — Zoned C-4 Burlingame, CA 94010 GUMBINGER AVRAM ARCHITECTS 60 East Third Avenue, Suite 300 San Mateo, CA 94401-4083 Telephone: 6 5 0/5 7 9-09 9 5 Facsimile: 650/5 7 9-1402 REC����a�;;:: NOV - 7 2002 CITY OF BURLfN(;;�,r�;-� PLANNING D: � On November 26, 2001 the Planning Commission unanimously approved an application to add New Meeting Rooms for the above referenced property. At this time, we are requesting an extension of one year to be considered by the Planning Commission at their next meeting. This request is due to the recent downturn of the economy, and the property owners decision to delay all major capital expenses and investments. We would appreciate knowing when this request will be taken into action as we would like to attend the meeting. Thank you. Very truly yours, GUMBINGER AVRAM ARCHITECTS, INC. ✓ :: ' � '�'�- ����� � Noemi K. Avram, AIA President NKA/lai cc: Mr. Paul M.N. Zen, Property Owner Today's III Inc. Paul J. Gumbinger, FAIA Principal Noemi K. Avram, AIA Principal . CTI'Y OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 696-3790 ��� CIT7 �� . . Bl1RIJNGAME APPL�CATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �...•���' �c��-to Type of application: Design Review Conditional Use Permit,� Variance��� Special Permit Other Parcel Number: �d�L��� �p Project address• ����1 ���'� � �I/_r� • APPLICANT �lt . ' % LI r�- /� • � • i� � : �i,- � � :I � / �/ � � �iI►_. i . .II�J /• i rl� PROPERTY OWNER r I' �1 • . � -� .�� � � i•,� � .�d. ► � I/ ♦ �/ ' � �/. � i... .:�u � .� f�l , Phone (w): ��7 � — 2'1ib� (h): N� �� '' _ ARCHITECT/DESIGNER -�I� C�s�►�v����%���(S Name: �(f.�j : �kl�t,�,�. la� Phone (w):�-z���7? - Z f��� ih): ��� (fl: b�/ 37�- ��1� Address: C� �'/ "�t�P�i�,��'/� Please indicate with an asterisk * �� �, �� �I the contact person for this project. City/State/Zip: Phone (w): �T���—�c(�'� (h�.�� . si r � � r � RECEIV�[� APR 1 2 2001 CITY OF BURLIP�GAME PLANNING DEPT. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: —�j� '''�J ���� ��'� � � AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and c ect to e best f my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: / Date: M,9�GE� 2�, 200 � ; �.I, ���i� � IA� �. I know about the proposed appli tion and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. � . Property owner's signature: Date: ������ 29, 200% � . �,G� PCAPP.FRM i:."<.� r�*m�rirra � , •� ,�,,.!� ' � -0= The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. � 1. Explain why the prnposed use at the proposed locahion will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, sc{�'ety, general we�'are, or convenience. �'�'�Os� �'Ut��►.IG �r l,c-rf� �K���Sta�l Uvti�V �-/ T�/� US� � S �SC( S'�i.�j cN "G6 f 6' � t�� �m .�T -t[��' t�r��5' �-t�oSS �t� -�OUt�c/At'-�D . —�� f��t'� �.�;��-l9 #-�t.�wtte3 I;�,ei°,�Nsi�r�j Wl�/ 1� -�i �tU M�i�trcv aIL- ��1 �v�C toc�S -�t� fl�'�rY 49�- lM�P�M�� W��/t.Ct+.�tY' �K- -� itJgu.�. t�vG�fi� S��Yi G�c•�Nk-v UtJ��pi G�- G�GIN✓b►� �8��• 2. How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance ivith the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? '���i`'/ �1�8' l S ��iSiG�r�c�� f�— �{�1/ t�/ �Y 'G� �vL�i'11�'��Ar� �t-�P $'Y �� `�Ci �� 1"u�r�l �`� T6fP� US E�i �S CDf�(S'��r U�f��' '�p' �� • 3. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and poterttial uses on adjoining propeities in the general vicinity? ��l�i I�vP�� N��� '�t.vGt��fi�t�c�J wti�v ��i s��c�f�, uJ �P��'�e �� �t�t-� -�� -t�tr� 1�Rt�t'�G � - �r�(' bta-c�►v S An-,p wu.�i g� �Pl1'G�bt.� u�1rA�- -�s , 1�� �w� a-o �4�OG�-r�G�,.. c�`' ���iSG�j ar-�D PQt��� U��f �1 �-�►-�►.�{, #�t�t��S �' -� Vu-+�-vcY. ��L����� A P R 1 2 2 0 01 cup.frm/Il /98 CITY OF BURLINGAIYiE PIANNING DEPT. � w � CI'fY OF BURLINGAME PLAAINING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD P(650) 558-7250 F(650) 6963790 ����,T. o� � , ECEIVED ���,,,,E ; .�ITY .OF BURLINGAME ; A P R 1 2 2 0 01 s :�; ; , VARIANCE APPLICATION �`'+...v...•'�� ��� TY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to your properfy which do not apply to other properties in this area. �� t`'�'�� � �- �'"i�fk�b►�D4�`i Gt K-C'.vri�l �� . b. °r`. G�arCc.�1 �°P� �v -cb -cW-� Pr� r�cY u�,�rf- a�S r�' �� � ��'�- f��c�W�s �s � �arct�( �SS � I 13 �-r� s� � �' '� N'�T6�w�dT %ii�'Gi.a�1 r� '� ��E� � -ct� M.CN►-�j � dr` 't�D G�Y' S L�D Fi w Explain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and en��nt of a substantiat property right and what unreasonab[e property loss or unnecessary hardship might result form the denial of the application. ���k��Ntis ��.sT ����►sGs I�•35� cF-r��v s-C�'i, tTfi�l�-�'S -L�r Q" ,� C�f�u-C� wb-ceid- � W�o�v� N�-v q�i�-d �t1��Pu-b�S ��V'�/ • �� f�'�=�� �I��i�w �l�v � N1,r�Bn'G� �'`( -cr� tsf wvt�- "�.�4v Cir�� `� tss5 l�� �1�-�u.-b �►°�s c�' � �+�� �iv�-f �,c.�i4 , G Explain why the proposed use at.the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, � general welfare or convenience. . � �e�b��'P M-�b i-�i�CcWtC� �A��) WN:t� �+s "� �M.�b (J�D /ks ��PY �Xlk��+�-ls 4.1 -G� s1� ,+�-o .4r t�, �t��vS �-G�asrS �� ��,�� :T� ��� r��,� �P�.�1 VvGw � g+� D�"�'�cM�� c� t,� �-�a-�S -� ��� �K- �►r -�r VFCt�t A� Tb �'chue� �o�vG�� �Ai�tY� G�N�+v W�� °i�- Ga�R bi�t.t�r • d How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? �' }�cS� I:��nrG� �i�u�.V�t�!' ��t�1 W�u/gti S�M � t,X� �1 �PiP��� �o I�ts� � � ��5�-l� ct�-- S'�f #ot�tJ �+,.�p v� � Cc►�-c�P��l� U�N'G� 'A� �fb��'�rl; � � ��/VK �►,0 ��#-�a�c.. A` A� �dG I�Gu-G q�.� �i�'HvG�'vl�aT � 1�P�� r��s ►�- -r� �� ��c�. � ,,r� �. � •eunuNqwMc . , °::. 1. 2. 3. COMIVV�RCIAL APPLICATIONS M1 PLAI�TNING C011I�IMISSION APPLICATION SUPPLENiENTAL FORM . ' •�• -� - � ���■■i..G� ►.�i7 .►' /c�.�.d/ Days and hours of operation. �� ��1„ � Number of trucks/service vehicles to be parked at site (by type). t� ��/ 4. Current and piojected maximum number of employees (including owner) at this location: Existing ' In 2 Years In S Years Hours of AM- After AM- After AM- After Operation PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM Weekdays Fu�l-time �� ��j � % �� ��, � Part-time L�- �o � (� [� Weekends Full-time `Cj �� G�� � Part-time � � 8 5. Current and projected maximum number of visitors/customers who may come to the site: Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years Hours of AM- After AM- After AM- After Operation PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM PM 5:00 PM Weekdays �9?i �% � � 8 l 7/ .� � (1� Weekends 7,r] tj j� rj'y� 6. What is the maximum number of people expected on site at any one time (include owner, employees and visitors%customers): . �� 7. 8. F� 10. Where do/will the owner & employees park? �,'�Q�d�Sr ��L�� I,�'� Where do/will customers/visitors park? /'�R-4�t't.�.��{�'�^� Present or most recent use of � y ',. � � I'.�= � ' ' 1 I List of other tenants on proper list if necess CITY OF BURLIfdGAtiiE PLANNING DEPT. �r� ciTv o� CITY OF BURLINGAME R�N AME PLANNING DEPARTMENT �- � � ��• � - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 �; TEL: (650) 558-7250 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD Application for a one-year extension of an approved mitigated negative declaration, conditional use permits, and parking variance for a single-story meeting room space addition to an existing hotel at 835 Airport Blvd., � zoned C-4. (APN: 026-343-430) ' The City of Burlingame,Blanning Commission announces tHe following public hearing on Monday, November 25, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed November 15, 2002 (Please,refer to other side) ' � : i i PUBLIC HEARIN� NOTICE ; � CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy of the application aricl=plans'for this�pi-oject.may be reviewed prior : � � ...v �, , . . ::t � � � � � � � �� to � the � meeting at��the��� Plamm�g Departinent at `�501 �.Primrose �� Road, � � � �� � Burlingame, Cal�fornia :: ' �° � .y � � � � - � � .. ' . f.r. i, ,- ' . . .. _ : ., � . . . . � � � �� Tf you�challerige the subject application(s)"in court;'��ou m y�be limited to � � raising on ly �t hose �issues you or'someone e lse ratse c l a t t he �iu b lic hearing, : described in the,notice �r.in written correspondence �iehver� d to the city j ` � at��or prior to the��pu�lic hearirig>, ° � , ', ` � . .. .u. � f_ C t - . . . . . . . .� 4 � . ��`. �% . ... . . . E . ' p.. . . .. . . . . r_.�.. ..�. :`� a..:r � . . .. . _. �� �� � � ��� � Property owners �?vho receive this notice �ire�responsible for informing their � � tenants about this nofi�e , For' addttional; information; ple rt e call (650) , 558 7250. Tf�ank yQu. �� " F ` ; - . a = I � . . . . � �i y r.. ��T �' ��, {3 i >- r� .. � - . � � � . ♦ O �.. � 1 ! .. ,x tl I . � . - . � �y ax9 i �f�t S,} °t{�, �C� S'' s�� f�✓ . .. � . � � Margaret Monroe'�� �:� � -� " 't ; ��y', ,� � � � � �� � � � "Gity Planner ���. �`a <e. t � ...., w�., ��.�r � � g_ 4 f'° Y _ ! .. _ . . . � � . JS p�`� .... r«�. .�- i. a :�'�. .. � . . . � . � . . . � 0. �'..�" �A ��� F � 4 / . . . ' . PUBLtC hEARING.YN,OTICE (Please refer to other side) p,� ;§i �t•�, � � n � Y" JdKi, $ a�. �Ji ���� N � 3 , ,., .,, "� �v , � � ti � .'.� � - �- �c r �- 'J ' � � (r 1 4 1 .' n i��,P; r, `�,,? V i� ��� �' �' x�. t t 1 �* rt . Tj r ) '�it . � ; ,w�`� 3 ,'�, F _' j ,� . � ,. �� } ;� � � �d = ; e �.� -z , � �. , R_'. ,i �{ o , ,. _•e. .d�.:. 1 ns . . . . �.t. x ,. , . ,. . , _ . .... ....esr �, ''� • '. � "'��-,.. { y � � '. � . i� ._.e� w Wh'• � ..... �, � 'tii F � ,!y .' �Q _r '�.. � {������ �� � ���� :j Y i r -' d� +� . ) � �'�� y � w� �, � a -:.. �ar� ���� .'t ��� �`"'* �, �k �'_� `i, � i � �X �r * ,s� � ' � t � �a r ���., ak i , f�"" ,� � �s •_ ,�` � �' '�' .��' . 4 � �� ,`�,g•��+.2 `��•'� } ���� ",+^4 x ,q � �� �� -� �'�,'y'f��i � :. . ,� ( �,' : ";x l� h � �y� � � F� �� � � Hr ✓ �:•: . a�� �..d,.� � ��� , � , � £ ��� ' €�',a4�.:` c r"'�£. � .� �'a - � ' k.,�.L. av' : � ?Sz�e�.A� �V �''� � 4�`Z" c � �°� i � t �r � ..�. � `�tr���°a'"m,i� ' %(�' �.;b.,�.....a .;t�z�, ...c ��"� '.tE�.'�i!��a�� � r • � _� 3 �ir:�' ij � �,��� 1,�����t``�'. �"..�,�- �'� "7� � � � i ♦ � .s ,` L14 4 +�'� i�' t . f �� , P � 7".,��, .� , ����:� 3 ,�� ' � � �� g�+. �'�/` : R� � s y � � �'�+ x�.; �- � f�"�Si � � ^fi7 .�`_. T,� '�1 t : ,�v�ag �'�r �,� �� �; �,�� \ ' .. �� � '�c � � iyp� �� �Ld � �.�`"' � ?x�'����►�"�',��a�"�' ,� ���.; .�'�i . ,r� € ''� "'��,� � J r . i �--+ n.y s,� _ �ra A �` r � q, �„�� �. ,� , r� � ra'� '� 8•t ' ^1^ y W< �;. � � � °'i"� � � I "-� �i �n �y � � "i- : � ,.,. _ . . . � � �� �Rk .. � ,�" .S �,;. �i'i n+"d ' a �C y � �. �d .. �• -a �k . � .,� r � '� `�'N�^�;¢: ."+' ��+ �"e�.r • �+� �;�-. � �'� a �Y�`": s �.: ��'r �+'�;� � �+� A� `� �r � �` �k"��j� � �� � ��,, � t�� �.. 'ry". x ' � ^�v � a.(, rv.� j - � d 3� u�3w " �P ,E � � � � �' �'� �'a" �,s � �� , , �E` ����z� �.' � � � �d ,�� ��'`_��'�`' � � 1� .t� • � �- � �` "� � e. § ,m�.��r i°�`^`F�- �`'�ey, �,�� � ,. '�i^" `r'' �`�• n 5 � �. ,��' 'FrYb �. � ��,� J,�� . �a � F�.�,'. � � 7 ��y� IR. �' . � w . _ .�d A P�� �- t: .�� ST X'Y' `Y 9" �- .. . '" � � 1, �� ����, ; • S1 S. t+�a'+^' ��'!° � S i�'" . � '� `,"� -�_��y �, � ^s : I.A» ��� � Y 7 `� s �g a ° ��Jr '. ��K}v^a4� -�� FF ,' j�. + � ' � r t.� � 9 ,� ..�',� +. xb/'�,�„ � � � . � � � i � d� "` ✓, l��i�� �,� z� �F � x�,, �a � � � 2�a� !�� � � � ,. � � ' ��i�a� � 0 . � ��y+ �' �, ��� � � E . '� '� wE � � � e ���+' ., +^ r, � ��� �7{ • . i � q . � �,��,. �# �'+• -. r� '� � ;. g a � � � '�� "� ;\ ` � � ,; > �� a �--. �I„d,���� a �.w'" �. � `� t � ,��r� � � �r ,� a , �%+� ,�b ,r .� � .1��5��� �,ae �`�: � � ..k S 9 . .. �+ 9 ' .*�f �l .,�( ; � s��p..,, � � � �' ��� ��. � � �� t' r - , � � �. �� i . ; �, :�i - . _ m�,,�.,� , -y � .. ; b � � �` � �^a' . �, 9. l.. � � w" ,;. "D.r `'� J R . . ' � � � ,����,a � � �r � \''� ; � � � � �� � t ��� • 11�'s'�'" ��. ��, �i 'a ;# � t� � e �°�� � � � � a a � � t ` � ,r�� �"�. � ' �"!� � � s� �t '� +.r •..�T �. � , qy . �, , s�x _ F� f{�,�` . d^��' x._ C 'y`q,1� b `` �� s� . ✓�' my, '. � F ' � t �� �n� t� `� `� �� ,,„ ` � '`,� ;� x'S,� . ;�:. 4 ��A�: i .�a"+�y, �k:�9 ' Es � � ,S �. �. t6 �z�.< N e � �\� Y'Y` �i''..; . :�� .x .: S , �`�," : �, ...A'� �` � � ✓ �,a" � �` v �?rp �� � , ` ,�� ��"� 5�` '� � � .� ., *� y, i �,�v��� Yf��� �.t �� �f° .1N� Y. �s��� �� . r' , . �" 5 �l ;� �j ... h 4 "• /3,'f :^fI'f '�, � �� < � � ^� ",+ � �3 ,�..� � T i `�`` 6r� r ; y�' y, g �` � p� � �r ��,. � �� �°�' � '°^ a .e F� .i. i�T" .,8, :�, 5'�,4� "1A�?, �� ��'�, a� ,' i s� .�*a - t� ,., a , a . . � � �� �, �a y � � � �. s� y � � Y ���,��� �' .�c � % � � <�, x �` , � � � '�`�� a �� .,,� ���r' t�'� •� � �K� ' „ � !� �f � � ' � � .. e - • �' . ,� '� ..�gt, .- .. ' ,��,i : '* �x � � ' c�� .r' ti��i` � � �� c t "r ! ,� y �'� y �.� ��,/�!� � �� �' �l � r+i, � 1. �� .`� d.. �a" ,,.:�'� � �%-� x� . � .,. �;� � 4G�'. ';f �� {i�;.�'.b."�, �3&'. a� � � � � � �y�'`y ti�'� � , '; � � '�s ar . w @, s �' � '��. ..'�' 'si � '-�� �� •� • s � �,' �i "i. .. .� ` "` f � ,,� �. � � � , � ,� � j�'. 4 � ;,; ,�. i I, , i e� - � s � � � 'i�� M ��''R�-: �� vi. � r � . �,��� �. �� <� ;� iw.. .�. . t� �- �g, � r `�� y . � s ;�r r � �F , �� � �� �� � ;.. ��� �� „, rw� � �" tr ��� �� � , ,a � �+s�., y � �� �?S ^3 r �`r L �' ,a sr, 'ya a � �#g�� p �;¢,f . � � �,¢ - . 'S_ � '�i>%e�rn+��z �'. ^� t ,.,��°a ,�c ��. �''r _y. w; } "� ,: ti. ... � �`.�. � ���'°" •w� ', � �.'�� ,� ,z,�� , "?�i G��..._ �,., ;o-' � ,� . �, - ;,; ,���v.; � �'�. %�s. � � �' .�-��"i." �- a 3� �.; a >�. �. � � � ., � ` ..,.,.. . _ � � . .� =".`�s°' .���" 'w v""� ,�,, � �;� a, � : � � . , � �;, � . . ° * " � � -��,. � !