HomeMy WebLinkAbout835 Airport Blvd - Staff Report 6.20.1983a. .
� .
� .
� �� '.. .�� � ,� :.
� '�� - "c X
� �
.:,.,
TO:
oa,TE:
FROM:
SUBJEC T:
�/-;�:r ,- �
L �ifLi•
r �eiLINGAME
1, ���;�
� ��'�`'''_::
�.:
,q� p o � ��� �-�w -- -- - ,� � �— - . � —
�D �''`�� � s+� .
Jl'I GI�rU�oiyv � �x �i � b r�- �� �� s 7'�� nG�i�fJ�
' � /� AGENDA S B
S�"�F'� R���RT M �M'
. � DATE 6/20/83
HONORABLE h1AY0R AND CITY COUNCIL, sueMirT Eo
� � e Y �� g,��,� ,.� � i1 n9-Q
MAY 25, 1983 �
CITY PLANNER eY PRovEo �
REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION OF FINAL ENVIROPJMENTAL IMPACT -��
REPORT FOR FOUR SEAS HOTEL, 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD ��� ���}
RECOMMENDATION:
`City Council hold a public hearing on the Final Environmental Impact Report (Draft
EIR and Response to Comments Addendum documents) and approve resolution certifying
the Final Environmental Impact Report. . �
BACKGROUND:
On April 25, 1983 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Draft
Environmental Impact Report for the Four Seas Hotel project at 835 Airport Boulevard
and on May 23, 1983 voted 7-0 on a resolution to recommend the Final EIR to the
Council for action. The Draft Environmental Impact Report addresses the potential
negative impacts of the proposed 310 room hotel at this site. The document recommends
Alternative C, a 74 foot high, eight story structure, with an FAR of 1.0, lot coverage
24 percent and 490 parking spaces on site. .
A major issue at the public hearing was a traffic mitigation recommended in the Draft
EIR (page 35) which suggested that the city could make improvements to southbound
101 by adding an off-ramp from 101 at Humboldt in the �vicinity of Howard. Residents
of this area (both in San Mateo and Burlingame) objected to the mitigation (see
Planning Commission minutes of April 25, 1983 and letters attacfied). A number of
other comments regarding the Draft EIR were also received (see.minutes). '
Following the public hearing Environmental Science Associates, Iric:, the environmental
consultant, prepared a Response to Comments Addendum to the Draft EIR. In this document
they found that the Humboidt-101 mitigation would not reduce cumulative traffic impacts
in the Anza area caused by the Four Seas Hotel project; and, as a result, recommended
the mitigation (Humboldt-Howard-101) be deleted from the Final EIR.
The Final Environmental Impact Report consists of the Draft EIR document as.amended by
the Response to Comments Addendum. Therefore, the deletion of the Humboldt-101
mitigation in the Response to Comments Addendum erases it from the EIR; the Response
to Comments Addendum supersedes the Draft EIR. The Amendment of the General Plan to
eliminate the Humboldt-101 recommendation further ensures that the proposal'will not
appear in any future EIR's nor will it be implemented as a result of certification
of any previous EIR's where it might have appeared as a proposed mitigation.
:' J
tl � s�
t a
-Z-
COUNCIL ACTION:
In certifying the Final EIR the Council would be certifying the Draft EIR as amended
by the Response to Comments Addendum. In addition, in certifying the Final EIR the
Council must make Findings. These Findings are included in the resolution attached
in Exhibit A.
EXHIBITS:
- City Council Resolution certirying the Final Environmental Impact Report
- Planning Commission Minutes, April 25, 1983 and May 23, 1983
- Planning Commission Staff Report (Item #2, May 23, 1983) �
- Planning Commission Resolution No. 2-83 recommending EIR-59P
- Letters from the public -
MM/s
cc: City Clerk
Ci ty Attorney
cc: Marty Abell, ESA
Stanley Lo, Four Seas Center
Chan Chak Fu, c/o Christopher MacDonald
Paul Salisbury, Blunk Associates
Ed Tower, DMJh1 Architectural Group
(interested citizens--see list in file)
�' T)
0
BURLINGAME
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 25, 1983
ITEMS FOR ACTION
� 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMEPdTAL IMPACT REPORT, EIR-59P, FOR A 310 R00�� HOTEL ON THE SITE
� AT 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD IN THE C-4 DISTRICT
Reference Draft EIR-59P for the proposed Four Seas Hotel, staff report dated 4/19/83
and City Planner 4/22/83 memo re traffic mitigations in Draft EIR-59P. CP discussed
details of the proposed project and then introduced Marty Abe11, Associate in charge
of preparation of this EIR for EnvironmentaT Science Associates, Inc. Mr. Abell
summarized sisnificant environmental effects of the project and cumulative impacts
as discussed in the EIR.
Chm. Graham opened the public hearing. Those speaking were:
- hlarilyn Mahaffey, 4 Peninsula Avenue, Burlingame, representing an association of
Burlingame/San Mateo residents called the Neighborhood Traffic Watch - concerned
about the mitigation in the EIR addressing an additional off-ramp from southbound
101 at Humboldt and an on-ramp to southbound 101 at Howard Avenue; this mitigation
also appeared in two other Final EIR's in the Anza area; DEIR does not address
impact of this mitigation on the neighborhood, i.e., possible loss of one block in
.San Mateo, safety, traffic volume, improvements to intersections in the neighborhood
which would be required to control the increased traffic flow,as well as air quality
and noise; EIR's for Anza�development on the east side of 101 should address possible
impacts on the west side of 101; EIR should be revised to remove the on- off-ramps as
. mitigation; area of the proposed ramp construction is within San Mateo city limits.
She requested Planning Corrmission and City Council review and revise the Specific •
Area Plan for the Burlingame Bayfront to eliminate reference to a new set of ramps
` for southbound traffic, the revision to read "provide a new ramp for northbound
traffic.°
CP explained the Specific Area Plan is part of the General Plan of the city. She
suggested Commission study amendment of the SAP and, if found appropriate, include it
with discussion of other General Plan revisions scheduled for May and June this year.
Mrs, htahaffey's comments regarding the mitigation in EIR-59P will be responded to in
the Response to Comments document.
- Clarence Cravalho, 1265 Vancouver Avenue, Burlingame, owner of commercial property
at the end of Howard Avenue in San Mateo - expressed concern about this dangerous
corner (have asked for stop signs but received no action), congested parking,
hazardous for children in the area; he questioned this manner of helping hotels on
the east side of 101 by impacting residents on the west side. �
- Maybelle Pinson, 900 North Humboldt, San Mateo (at the corner of Humboldt and
Peninsula) and a member of the Neighborhood Traffic 4Jatch - supported Mrs. Mahaffey's
remarks; urged the city to initiate another study addressing traffic generated by
projects in the Anza area and to follow up the BCDC leiter regarding a 101 corridor
study so that over time development decisions do not cause unanticipated traffic
impacts. There ti•�ere no further audience corrments and the public hearing was declared
closed.
%
Commission comment: page vii, include visual impact of project on future park area
and public lands; page 29, include levei of service load on 101 during peak hours,
this project's impact on peak hour 101 as well as impact of other projects approved
in the Anza area; page 31, include Hyatt expansion in list of other developments
which would be located near the Anza area; page 40, Employment, Population and
Housing, clarify reference to detailed employment data; include employment rate of
the City of Burlingame, if possible; also number of jobs being created by approved
projects in the Anza area including this one; page 51, clarify mitigation with
regard to ecology; page 65, include visual impact on our landfill site, include
statement regarding impact on one another from clustering of buildings; page 72,
first paragraph, is hotel the sole use city will allow on this site?; page 76,
Comparative Evaluation of Project Alternatives, why is traffic solution of Alternate C
so much better? look at this again.
Further Corranission comment: will any grading be required, what provision is made for
intercepting drainage from the sanitary landfill; address State highway standards
regarding distances between off-ramps as it would affect west side mitigation;
look at whether more of the front setback on this busy street needs to be landscaped.
One Commissioner commented that the EIR does not appear to relate to a specific set
of plans and expressed concern Commission appeared to be dealing with specific
factors of the EIR as opposed to determining whether it is legally sufficient.
CP explained interaction between an EIR and a project in staff's view: project is
submitted in general terms, alternatives are proposed, applicable mitigations
required in the EIR will be seen as findings in the Final EIR and as specific
conditions to project approval. An EIR looks at the environmental effects of a
project and specific modifications to the project shou7d be made before the plans
are presented to Commission, thus through the EIR process a proposed project can
respond to concerns. There is an interaction process between environmental review
of a project and development of the project site itself. Staff, Commission and the
developer work together to better meet the environmental needs.
Consultant will prepare responses to all comments received this evening. _
�
A
BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MAY 23 , 1983
2. REVIEW OF FINAL EIR-59P FOR THE FOUR SEAS HOTEL PROJECT, 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD
AND PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 2-83 REC01•1MENDING THE FINAL EIR TO CITY
COUNCIL _ _
CP Monroe reviewed. Reference staff report dated 5/13/83; Planning Commission Resolution
2-83 with attached Exhibit A, Significant Effects, Mitigations and Findings; and
P.esponse to Comments Addendum dated May 1983. CP noted responses in the Addendum refer
to written comments received prior to the public hearing and all verbal comments during
the hearing as well as Corranission input. All comments received subsequent to the
public hearing will be forwarded to Council for inclusion in its public hearing.
Commission action this evening will be on Resolution 2-83 with attached Findings of
Fact, if the DEIR and Response to Comments Addendum are found to be complete. CP
pointed out that the Addendum recommends the mitigation addressing Howard/Humboldt/
101 access be eliminated from the EIR; concern about this mitigation was expressed
at the pubiic hearing on April 25. ,
C. Garcia moved that Commission find EIR-59P to be complete, after review of the
Addendum and Findings of Fact, and moved for approval of Planning Commission Resolution
No. 2-83 Recommending Environmental Impact Report EIR-59P to the City Council. Second
C. Cistulli; motion approved unanimously on roll call vote. Staff will forward to
Council and expects Council hearing to be scheduled for June 20, 1983.
�� f,
2 a
P.C. 5/23/$3
MEMO T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: CITY PLANNER
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF FINAL EIR ON FOUR SEAS PROJECT, 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD
Following the Planning Commission's public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact
Report for the Four Seas Hotel project on April 25, 1983, Environmental Science
Associates has prepared the attached Response to Comments Addendum. This Response
to Comments Addendum addresses all the comments received before the close of the
public hearing. These comments include written comments on the Draft EIR from city
staff, public agencies and private citizens; as well as verbal comments made at
the public hearing by the public and Planning Commissioners. Any comments received
from the public agencies after the official closing date or from the public after
the close of the public hearing will be acknowledged and forwarded to the City Council
for inclusion and consideration in their public hearing. State law requires that the
City Council hold a public hearing on the Final EIR (Draft EIR and Response to
Comments Addendum) prior to any action on certification. �
Attached is a copy of the Response to Comments Addendum, the Findings of Fact
(Exhibit A) and the draft resolution for the Planning Commission to consider. The
Planning Commission's action will be to determine, after review of the Addendum and
Findings of Fact, if the Final EIR is complete. If it is determined to be complete,
the Commission should then act on the resolution. In this case the Commission's
action is a recommendation to Council. The public hearing on this item has been
held, no further public hearing by the Planning Commission is required to take this
action. In Burlingame the�City Council takes certification action on a Final EIR.
If the Planning Commission approves the resolution recommending the Final EIR to the
Council, according to local regulation the Council will schedule the public hearing
on the Final EIR at their meeting of June 6, 1983.
I UU��G�����
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
MM/s
5/13/83
att.
cc: Marty Abell, ESA
Stanley Lo, Four Seas Center
Chan Chak Fu, c/o Christopher MacDonald
Paul Salisbury, Blunk Associates
Ed Tower, DMJM Architectural Group
(interested citizens-see list in file)
� �
t , �
0
/
CITY OF BURLIflGAME PLANiVIPJG COP�MISSIO��
RESOLUTIOP! N0. 2-83
RECOMMENDING ENVIRONP�IE�4TAL Ih1PACT REPORT EIR-59P
FOR A PROPOSED FOUR SEAS HOTEL AT 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD
�, �dHEP.EAS, the California Environmental quality Act of 1970 (Public
.•:: Resources Code, Section 21100 et seq. provides that local governmental agencies
"� � • . • shall make written environmental impact reports on any project they intend to
carry out which may have a significant effect on the environment; and
4JHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 has been
. construed by the California Supreme Court to require local governmental agencies,
including municipalities, to make an environmental impact report upon all private
. applications for lease, permit, license, certificate, or other authorization or
entitlement of use; and
T WHEREAS, Section 21081 stipulates that no public agency shall approve
� or carry out a project for a�hich an environmental impact report has been
� completed which identifies one or more significant effects thereof unless such
public agency makes findings as specified in Section 15088 of the regulation ;
in Title 14 of the California Administrative Code, the State EIR Guidelines; �
�� and .
WHEREAS, members of the public and other concerned parties must be •
given an opportunity to provide input both in the making of the report and the .
• ultimate decision upon the private application based in part upon that report; ,
and '
� 41HEREAS, on the 25th day of April �1983, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., in
the City Hall Council Chambers of the City of Burlingame, Count,y of San Mateo,
State of California, said time and place being the day, hour and place fixed
for hearing upon said Environmental Impact Report, the Planning Commission did
hear and consider said Environmental Impact Report;
i�0Y1, THEREFORE. be it RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby
recommends the Findings in EXHIBIT A based upon the Final EIR and substantial
evidence in the record and FIPJDS as follows: � j
_�_
11 ��
! _1 ••
0
c
�
That the changes or alterations identified as potentially part of �
the project in the Mitigations have been or will be required, or incorporated
into, the project in order to avoid the significant environmental effects
: identified in the Final EIR.
That if these changes are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
�' of another public agency, they have been, can be or shou7d be adopted by such
;
�. other agency; �
That specific economic, social or other considerations may make
infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the
Final EIR;
That the City shall not approve or carry out a project as proposed
unless the significant environmental effects have been reduced to a level
� acceptable to the City.
----�•- • P�OW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Environmental Impact �
�:
Report designated above, including the Addendum to EIR-59P dated MAY ,
�, 1983, as the same was prepared and filed with the City Clerk, is hereby
� °. recommended to the City Council to be the Environmental Impact Report required
'; by law to be made by the local agency, with the Significant Effects; Mitigations
� and Findings as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached hereto.
/ � �
� . �/.� .� i•��.c
arry r �raham
Ghair
: I, PJAtJNETTE M. GIOP1I, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the �
, City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was .
: introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
�
on the 'l3 day of 1�Yc, ,19£33, by the followina vote:
/
AYES: CO'r1�lISSIONERS: CISTULLI, GIIP,CIA, GIOMI, GRAHAPt, LEAHY, SCHWl1Lt4,
TAYLOR
P�OES: C0;^.MISSTOt�ERS: plO��E
ABSEt�T: CO(•i�•tISSIOfdERS: Nf1ME ,`, . ,`; / / '"
/ 4
i ' L ;! � � . ,, />( �".G�-,. C /
Nannette h1. Giomi
Secretary
�
;
�
FOUR SEAS HOTEL
835 AIRPORT QOULEVARD
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
1. Height would exceed 50' limit
established in Specific Area Plan.
2. 80� of minimum front setback (30')
is not landscaped.
3. Site and cumulative development
in area would require an increase
in police protection services.
4. Adequate water capacity to meet
fire flow requirements.
0
a
EXHIBIT A
MITIGATIONS '
la. Grant a use permit and accept; or -
lb. Reduce height to 50' consistent with ,
Specific Area Plan height limit, or
height consistent with adjacent buildings.
2a. Accept; or
2b. Require parking to be revised so that
front setback landscaping requirement
is met.
3. Provide on-site security services, and
to meet cumulative need add one police
beat.
4a. Project would be designed to meet
California hiahrise requirement and
city regulations.
fINDINGS
la. Height limit is a review line,
therefore there is no maximum height
limit in the C-4 zone. Proposed height
does not exceed any limits established
by the FAA. Building would be lower
than tallest approved but higher than
adjacent buildings.
lb. Would have less impact on adjacent
buildings and future city park; would
obstruct views through site more.
2a. Landscaping is a design guideline
requiring a use permit, therefore it
is not an exception to the code but a
review line. Because of its triangular
shape this site has two frohtages which
are affected by the landscape require-
ment, therefore some adjustment may be
suitable.
2b. Parking could be re-laid out or a
variance considered to pull parking
back out of the front setbacks to �
allow more landscaping; curb cuts and
driveways could also be adjusted.
3. On-site security would reduce city
police staffing requirements; addition
of one city police beat would provide .
effective support to private security
to meet the cwnulative policing need.
4a. Meeting internal building design •
requirements would reduce effects to
an acceptable level.
�
�
r
0
0
�
+
�
�
� ,
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
5. Safety hazards to motorists
using site access roads.
MITIGATIONS
4b. The capacity of the affected water mains
would be determined and any improvements
necessary to provide adequate water
pressures and fire `flows made to meet
the standards of the city Fire Department.
4c. Install fire hydrants and provide ,-
emergency access as required by the
Burlingame Fire Department.
5a. Redesign access from Airport Boulevard
at north corner of site to anticipate +
realignment of Airport Doulevard resulting
from planned improvements. .
5b. Greater separation of service driveway
and garage ramp on Airport Qoulevard or
operate as a divided roadway 4�ith veliicles
entering only the service roadway and
exiting only the ramp driveway.
5c. If use divided roadway approach on Airport
' Boulevard, then service road and ramp on
Anza Boulevard should be operated/
coordinated with service road an exit
and garage ramp an entrance.
5d. Provide left hand turn lane on Airport
Boulevard for the service driveway.
5e. Widen curve on Anza Boulevard garage ramp
to avoid accidents caused by U-turns on
Anza Boulevard.
fINDINGS
4b. Completion of the study and meeting '�.�c
the approved requirements would reduce ��' '
the effects to an acceptable level. �
4c. Installing fire hydrants and emergency
access to city standards will reduce
the effects to acceptable levels.
5a. Circulation plan for Anza Area
anticipates a future widening and re-
alignment of Airport Boulevard which '(?�fl!:..
will affect this site. Improvements
will be paid for by developers (Bayfront
Development fee) and by city. These
improvements are probably ten years in
the future.
5b-d.Proposed improvements will reduce
effects to acceptable levels.
• � .... .
_ -1 I`=''- . � . � �,�
5e. Ramp modification would reduce'effects
to acceptable level.
r.
0
� . .
3 -2-
i
�
V .�
e
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
V
MITIGATIONS
FINDINGS
6. Cumulative traffic in area east
of Highway 101.
7. Increased demand for housing in
city and market area.
5f. Provide left turn lane at main entrance
and Airport Boulevard or prohibit left
turns from Airport into project. If
left turns are prohibited from Airport
Boulevard, these vehicles could enter
from Anza Boulevard.
6a. Build new on- and off-ramp at Anza
Boulevard to U.S. 101 northbound.
6b. Widen to four lanes the existing two
lane section of Airport Boulevard between
Bayshore Highrray and Bayfront Channel
(also see 5a).
6c. Install traffic signal at intersection
of Anza and Airport Boulevards as
cumulative traffic increases.
7. Give preference to hiring qualified
' permanent employee applicants who are
residents of Burlingame.
5f. The proposed improvements or alterations
to traffic pattern will reduce effect
to acceptable level.
6a. Addition of this roadway and ramp will
improve operations at all three critical
points in the Anza/Bayfront area.
Improvements will be paid for by
Bayfront Development fee and city.
Thus new roadway will reduce cumulative
effects of this and other projects east
of 101 to acceptable levels.
6b-c.Improvements will improve operation of
entire roadway system serving area on
east side of 101 and are designed to
reduce to acceptable levels the
cumulative effects of this and other
projects in the area.
7. Demand for housing in city would be
reduced by the number of local residents
employed. This plus number of units
expected to be added in next ten years
and availability of housing and improved
mass transit access to the site will
reduce the housing demand to an
acceptable level.
8. Seismic hazard to employees and 8. Build structure on driven piles; minimize 8. The effects of potential ground shaking
visitors to the site. settlement of rest of site by recompacting hazard will be reduced to acceptable
or surcharging artificial fill and removing levels.
material in fill on site which can decompose;
develop ground response spectra and
incorporate findings into highrise structure •
design, use on-site borings.
-3-
�
r,
a
�
` SIGNIFICA��T EFFECTS
9. Water quality and drainage, surface
runoff and underground water.
�
e
1
i
�
i
�
MITIGATIONS
9a. Sump pump to pump storm water into storm
drains; elevate occupied areas of hotel
to at least 9 feet t4SL.
9b. During construction take specific measures
to protect Sanchez Creek Lagoon and San
Francisco Bay from site preparation and
grading impacts; prepare and grade during
dry season, provide sediment traps near
sump pumps; keep heavy equipment away from
tfie ed9e of the lagoon; monitor water in
sump to assure toxic contaminants and
heavy metal ions are within permissible
levels. If contaminants exceed permissible
level provide on-site treatment before
discharge into sto rni sewer or dispose of
in suitable off-site location.
9c. Waterproof below grade construction for
underground parking facilities.
FINDINGS
9a-j, Additional tests could identify
potential leachate and methane gas
problems on this site, however if
these mitigations are included in
the project design effects witl be
reduced to acceptable levels.
9d. Place oil separating traps at all drains ;y:, �
in driveway/parking areas or at central ,______----Y�'" -�" -�����M � j`' •- n.�
collection point ahead of drainage pumps.
9e. Fill site to elevation 1' MSL to prevent
• ground seepage under the structure if
contaminants are found to be present.
9f. Intercept surface drainage from adjacent
solid waste disposal area in lined ditch
along western edge of the site, carry
to safe disposal area.
9g. Slope streets and parking away from lagoon
edge so that runoff will pass through oil
separating traps prior to discharge.
. � • ; / ?. � . �'. 1�S 7,�� �,':. �.i `�� �� l ` .F� /.
Y'': l,.
�: � l � y��,,,,,` .�i...--' �
��
n
-4-
0
�
�
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
10. Improvements to the areawide
water service facilities.
11. Improvements to secondary
wastewater treatment system.
12. Noise increases from cumulative
development.
0
MITIGATIONS
9h. Use sulphate resistant concrete for
any structures that would be in contact
with soil or ground waters; put under-
ground utilities in non-ferrous pipes
or encase or coat steel pipes.
9i. Landscaping materials should be salt
tolerant requiring a minimum of fertilizer
and pest control, sub-drains will be
necessary to prevent root rot.
9j. Vent areas under structures to prevent
collection of inethane gas, protect under-
ground utilities with cutoff collars, vents,
impervious backfill material to prevent
gas migration throu9h these facilities.
Under structure ventilation should be
twice that normally provided, ventilation
to outside for furnace areas, hot viater
heaters, motors or equipment with pilot
lights or electrical rays should also be
twice that required by the Building Code.
10. Provide a new water main under U.S. 101.
11. Project will contribute a sewer service
fee and will provide on-site pretreatment
for liquid wastes from any area in which
food is prepared.
12. Provide pile drivers with shields and limit
hours of pile driving to city standard;
build and vegetate landscape berms to impede
noise flow onto site; insulate to reduce
interior noise to 45 dBA; surround construc-
tion site with solid fence.
FINDINGS
10. tJhen justified by cumulative need
the construction of a main will reduce
the effect to an acceptable level.
11. Inclusion of these mitigations will
meet the requirements of the San
Francisco Regional ldater Quality
Control Board and the city and will
reduce the effects of this project to
acceptable levels.
12. Inclusion of these items to city
standards would reduce significant
effects to acceptable levels.
--�' .
.
. �
�
� �
�
f -5-
,
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
13. Irreversible environmental change
in use of nonrenewable resources
and construction and operation of
project.
0
i
�
MITIGATIONS
13. Project built in compliance with
city planned densities which are
based on manageable levels of traffic,
land use and construction.
EXHIBIT A
-6-
0
FINDINGS
13. Because development based on planned
development of city the irreversible
environmental change caused by use of
nonrenewable resources in construction
and operation of the project are kept
to a minimum; although vacant, use
of this site will not stimulate further
use of these resources because the
available area for new development in
the city is very limited.
0
,
0
�� � .,
���������
_.��....:'r �'.''T"�+t�`4.Mi': '; q_ u'_ ^!Yr,*'� x.•_:+?.7.Y�.a�.�.:a ruL L^kt":.Y:, r. rr"2'KL ��i'�7'�V:
' ' � �' .i { ' ' ' .� S _ � � � 1 .
,1 � 4 '•, ' �' 1 t ! ' 1 , �,.� t � Cl ' � s
..J.�y..�e.i:t«1...Ya_.n. .5���n`-'.v..iY......�.�1!:. ._.�. � ':lT.i:a..vv::k'.i•Y.. �ti4 .'t .•�:9
929 NORTH APnPHLETT BOULEVARD
SAN �.1ATE0. CALIFORNIA 94401
TELE�HONE 347•2151
�3�� :i���
t�1f1Y. �' = .i9�3
� �ti►F ��b���
Burlingane Planninb Co�mmission
501 Prirarose P.oad
Surlingame City iiall
Burling�e, Calif. 9401Q
Attention: t�ieg Monroe
Dear I�is. Z•ionroe:
t�iay 3, 1933
x have been a resident of 102o No. Hur�boldt St since 1941. D1y home
is in a very quiet, alder neighborhood. We t��uuld very auch like to
keep it that �aay.
A plan that is before you is to construct an additional off-raap from
southbound U.S. 101 onto Hwnboldt St. and one on-ra�p to southbaund
U.S, l0I from Howard Ave. This netv traffic pattern would greatly
disturb our neighborhood. j�le already have soiae difficulty bacl.ing
out of our drive�rays because of the e�.isting tr�tffic and the ne���
planned traffic taould raake it virtually ir�possible. The traffic
noise tvould �reatly disrupt our now quiet nei ;hborhood plus it t,rould
definately devaluate our property values.
There now e::ists an on-off r�p At Bro�zdt,ray in Burlingane and one at
Poplar Ave. in San 2�;ateo. There are access roads from both sides of
the free�ray so any additional traffic an use these raaps.
I �•�ould, as a concerned citizen, appreciate it if yau Z��ould consider
r�ll of the above and possiUly iraprove the e.�cisting ra�s rather than
addi,r.g an additional one.
Sincerely,
California State Contractors
License No. 3-0404
�y/�% L��Li.c C�'}�c�.'vC-C..t.c�C.t,
2�lario Mareucci
�ph
n .f ' �
^� -.. : � ' _' " fy
s's �:, t✓ .. i �+ .
r�y s, 1933
;11}�,'; �� ��
�Tv�c,,-�g�,:M � �t;�,
Burlinga�e Plannino Co�ission
501 Prirarose Road
Burlingame City Hnll
Burlingarae, Cala.fo 94010
Att�ntion: Meg Monroe
IIear Z-is. rlonrae:
I ara a• resident of I25 Humba�.dt Road, Burlingame and have lived
in this neighborhoc,d far a�ver 15 years. My children have gratan
up here and c��e hope to cantinue livino here far �any years.
A.pl�n that is before you to add an on-off r�mp soutli bound an
U. S. I01 at Hunboldt St� and Hot��ard Ave. ���uld greatly disrupt
ou: currenr o�ay af life. The added traffic that ioould come
thrau gh our neibhbarhood wouZd change us from a quiet, alder
n�iohboxheod into ._living. an the edge of a. freet�ray.:. This tve
would lilce to avoid �t a1I possible cost. .
[,Te �mota that this plan is bei.no considered becau�e of netu con-
struction in the area; ho���ever, I do feel tha.t the exi�ting
residents of the area should also be cansidered and t:=hat affect
this is goin6 to have on u�.
�dith on-off rar.ips at Broadtray and Poplar Aves.. it does not seem
all that necessary to add an additional ramQ in our neighborhood.
Please �ive this a great deal of cor.sideration before you make
any decision. ,
Sincerely= �
� � U
� ��.(�'--�.�.��c�. � �- �� .
Arlene Nunziati Gj
.� .
.., �� �,�,,,��
� � .� :ir W. 1 :� ►d �.�
I re�Iiz� t'�:�t it t��a � been s�.i:� t'ne possit�llit�� of the crea.tion of �
this af �-r�.mp m�3� b� years in t'�:z futvre, but I w�ul� Zike to a�o
on rec�r.� �s st� �ir�g th.a.t my `'am11y anc� I�r^ ve'��c��ertly op�oszc? -
Tr�:E;dE�TEA the pro ject rn�y be censic� ere� . .
Yours,
�
��+ �� j i *r� r t
.;=�.� :._zj. �
23 DVri�h :��Ro�c'
PL)3'1�t1��.?il@. C�li�'.
;�rll'a�` �1. � "���
L'ITY OF BURUFJGAMz
FIAt�NIt:� DiP'C.
May �c, 1�P3
Mrs. Mez �Ionro� � City Planner
City. o`_' Burlir.���e
�OI Pri�rose F?oacj
BuY'11:1C,2.�e, �alifornia 9'-i010
��- :.. � RE: POSSIEILITY CF FiJiUAE k'EST BCLfi1D OFr FAMP
�e�r Mr�. :�ionroe:
r�s a n�a�:.�er. of the com�itt�e to cre�te a Housin� El�m�nt for the
cit�'s Gener�' PI�n� the committe:e to discuss Water"-ron�t pro_perty
t�sa�e, an�? a. co_Zcerne,� P�.Y''�Y'it from 'rJashinqton Elemenfi�.ry Sctiiool;
I wish �:o ti•oic� �y c�r_czrr� over any intent to approve an off-ra�np
k*hi.ch will �.: fect !�y schr�ol aue c?�il�?ren an�? our nei�hborhaoc�.
S e�n unc� ers �aric? the neac� for a.n on-off ramn on the Ea.st sici e of
the �yshore rr.ee�r��.y to a�sist tY:e tr��.ffic problem of hotels �nc�
of`'ic�s on t�ie w� t�Y'frc�?Zt; howeve-r, �r_y inf� t.x of trucks ar.r a.uto-
rsor�ile tr=�.f;'io or.to t�e �Zrea<�y crow��er.? A=I zo_�eci streets in �ur
i1ei��ht�r'zcor� woul�' be a. �erribl� threa.t to t'nQ atnosphere of our
�rea. The �=�jor.its of stu.�'ents w�Ikin� to ��aas��liz._�t'to�1 School an:z
wa.lki►_�: �1ome a.�-a.in walk on Ho�v�.r�� At�env.ee The police a.lrea�y seeM
to h�.ve � terrible tiMe cantr.ol�in�? sz�ee�i �Ion� Howarc? Avznt�e.
r,, s':�
C
,, . .
a
. _ ' ...{:•,::. f.�• :�_,��:.5'.'�, : ::
. . . .. , .::�: '.`}=.
S.: � . . . .. �,� �.� � . .. . :;;�. ~j:.-
, . •, . . . , . . . . ---
:';,�= ` ` . ' � . .: ' . . . :. , , . . " - _
. .. r � ... . ., .. ..;.. . . . . .
.., .. :
..�. .-_.. , .. . . . . . . . - _ . - _
. -.. � � _
......s,._ ... . .. .. �--
. ..
.. .
. .
. .. . , _.. , _ . .:.., . . . . . . . . , . . . . ,. „ • _ , . .
. . . ..
. . , . .. -�
. , . .. . . - .:
.., ., . -.
. . , ... ...
. .. )a.�i . . . . . . . . . . .. ... .... . . .. . . . . . , . . . . .. . .
' :}`
� � �
- '�
-�''$l�w ^:.-� s^ � � I1R � M
i a �+ � �' y
i�:i �1Y � � i983
• CI P�NNIt�G OEPTlAE
� Ci �;;* oi =�rr1=-�l�_a.;;�e ��. ��r�i_1;; Co: ��:?s.��:ion
� j�� �'r_�nros:� ::�^�:1
. �Lli.^� 7..•'�,::^":1� � 1�:: � �;.':�..�i
'h
' ���a nP.31' vl�.?.:L'::?illl �.'�11,^. L"iOEitC.1:�SS10113Y'St
_'°-1�
! = =Y �� � 1� �;
T'"i. �?^.S CO::? 'iq i'1�'- ^.�G�:1�10:? ���li: i'!� =3�.111.3i:�;�i:1� �iF;:lA11n�;' �Oi'Itti:i_�SIOn
'� �.?-, r o: � '1 %.� r.�i �. 1 a- y.�' �.�� j ^'i'^ �,a nr' � i�� ;P�
L�r1.il I..f CJ:1.^,�7.;1.11?�;_, .^.."il , �1jI1=:�i_l:l. _'1"Ei=t 1i17r.C�, t]Oi ��iJ 1: ri:1. �1.`-�'C`: --.T'-'�
G�rhic_: i�:r.1 �.. �s ��iz ��,�.� .%b, ,� a�-rap:� ?;. r,; i us co::s �ruct on�: a�.'dit; o�zal
Oii:--t:� T'�,:1;) � i::Iil SOL1�iii�OlLYI.v. LiL _7� ';Q ::U�:1)O� ...:. �OGC :Y1� 0:13 0:1—I'=3::ti?
i.0 SO1J.�'i,il''::O1111(1 :,':i J.t✓1 fY'71-t1 iT7::�?1l7 � i,"�111�.'t
I 2.R1 lri Oi:�OS1�1.:Ji1 ''l.t� t.i71.8 �i?.1'i. Oi ��:�� �.I._C. 2.S �i17_S I'�?t.f,8.^ j�a�lu :?80�\�3:)
t�rl:,:i �.h�� r�����:?�or�c; F^e�r•;:�.;;r �:ra.s conscrv.c'��:c?. in the 1�L;J's. Ii �il�� re:�i%ents
O.I �t:T'� 1i1�;?"�13 �1�:1'. ::%J11�"i,c?(.1 :I1 �il—Oi1 I'�''.fAj7 c�t �'10'':2.T'C ."•.V�11U2 lf; L':OUl:.' r18.V� �
�nc': �:=�ui:i '_z_.v,� L���n :ao�z� at that tir.��.
^1'Z�a ;.���°�ra.l �'la.� f��^ ��:�� Cit�T of �ui lin��,nc; �•rhich is o;� fi�e ut our
i:i�'�"'� 1;7;:;airiP n1a.���,7.0 T.; brar,�,r I::c..':�:PS T_'10 iT:e �'�:10i7 Oi ?I1 O� r—OTl Y"�:I"t� at
L7 T.r-�y.,` .i V.., i 1. m � y, � a �,� i:j.:. n �.,,��� ••_r t a� -i '�.�i l `7� i C^K
ui�..c_. . •.:.nQ ��u�. i�ol.dt�e 111.: c.li��u�.'ll�.C: 3i) �1 1�..� C1tiJ f C.:.V'c�.0 t.j..��l_ i...L � r.� J�
S•:i1:i_C'' J.S �l �c'.]"ii. Or 't;?�3 Gezer•�a.�. Plaz Ctll.ii,:' C�_:?2.Y'�.,•," �'_7'����S 't:':e �2:11:1.�,Lllcl
nV�I1U� O�'er;�:.ss ��P_�''1 ri0 ''i.U.:C:?—OIf c?t I,o�.:1ard r"1�1 i�L1:100�Clt.
.. ":iy *.�;ife 2,rir� T_�1^P pZ'c?53:1��_� 't�1� OI•II2BT'S Of i;h'_^�� IlOL:S�S Ori HO!+I��.S'C� rVenu�
� � �•111'1.C_'1 ?f� i1�V:.'• 11:1�J�OV��C. OVBY' 'Li10 �TearS. i� �il•�T'� Il�u+.i be�ri c^11;f 1T2;i1Cut1.Q:1
•�``' tl;�t �he s�r�e�_ :rould ae used. ?.s 4.n acc�ss �ozc! to t�ze fre�.�.af, �re
,_;,���.�
'. .. .- CC'.I'�',?.1.:7!�r y!011ln :20t UE t",''lc". O::'T1Cr'S of th�'.SE' '�'I'Oi��Y'1i.1.^-,S �'.00��t,;.
`r}Z'.T'� 3]."i: �'i•::11� 1.�,-^.S :?'it:'1 37 -i S!n2.1.� Cils.(�Y'•'�;1 1',1 t'.�TO Ol OUY' Y't?il%.c^..1.
-*-�ro�erti��. I t•;ould not :��ant �o see t:�,�se c'•zil;lien, or any other
'� � c�ii� dr�n, �ndari�ere�? b�� az increa�e of trais"ic on ??orrarcl ;,venue. Last
,
� �•��s u c:�i_c� ;;a�= strac:: �;� a.'��ricle l:: ;ron� of :.e�xbf ;fasl�iin�ton' School
•� (�,r.�r t::� L'.:3T, �'�F�.T'S v(18 C3S'S f��].0:7�1f1� �'i,�� I,1Jr ?'T1.f 8� It1��J' rJ'.�.U�:1�'i,�T' � Fl(1C1 8
't;?:13�1t � _'S. :C:1�;�;1 :T1C� t �''1::. w.�. y�bc^.1�� �3Y'1C2� 021 T�O[;tiT'C� t�venue, �•7@T'�
, a� 1 s��:�::r��l�� cizraao�d :�:n�n struck �ay ot�z�r vehicl�s . All thi.s poin�� to
� � t:ze f�c{: rh�� Iio.•r��sd �.venue is not �,h� sa��st street in �.lrlin�ame and
�ha� there s:�ould be no increase in traffic:
Far�her:nor�, it is m;� oninio : that of� �ri tr_��i'ic to �,ie .free,-ray should.
noc oo ciir�c�� J� ti:rouo� a fir�t re�i���n���:i.1 ;iistric;;.
_-._:'_:.
•:�
=�;
�
;,�z
�.z
.; j�; +
.. _-;,�
; k:rys.i
. �::�f
.`�y
:M1'�4
yy
,���
'';'R
;•:��
�. �
-��
.?;`,
:t_:��
�
: :�:�a
'Y
_- ti�
;.r,;
:= ;s
=I'". ... ... . . .. .':3:::9•�:.�. . :".'trr .... .. . . • .
'. •� .. � .. . . .. � . . . _ � . .. , '. . ...... . . . ._. . ...._ ...... . : . .
�
r+
l,l ��T n'��.' :�llT'� 1�7•�ill:l �
i�1 =�ZI..lV i'J:7L:�Z.ilJ�..f�i!. '�...
t'.a�� �: � � [�l)"�
a: =it�t,*,31.^',`'.. .•',ZT�t1L`'' SrO�.: ;•t.11.� f'1_rir� i:il�� i•,1''1� r�:� ��:i '3-�-!-i , �n�� ' �����
,, � �, ��_ �a..•_ .c: � . :�_zs, ��--.. n;���
' 3T'� :i.� '', ��.� �:L'�:i: �:li.'t �� =.'L:'�;1 � LL t?„ '�� :2�•T12c�1.'r, =i1 �:1� Ci'i �7. �i:11CY' nOL2S:�c �
2� sVi.�7U�li •(;)?f;�r '7?�J i; � .'•1lL'.'l}.;i_t: :L�1 '�'y);l"?1 ;:S1C� y ,�^.�('�� 'i�Yl�� :10:�1';.� Oi 011T'
:':��^�'�t�f3'.1i'.0 .�11'J �l_�Zr�' Ci105�'_1 t:J 1.1Z�;:��"!'�:C.`: �.'•c'.C.•^_-.L�S'� Of ,:'ti� �'Zi .�•�c l�r•
' L.r. ai1-G .t"..:, t�
C1i�,v �l�.a t0 0=_'zY`.
�?1 O{�i^7:2 :^c]'1� �^..i; .:Oi9t-lY'C� ?.tri�i ?itL.i�oldt i;'i�'. Ci.'���"i,�'O�T thc? Cl':?'t'3C��: O� �i11S
ne� �lZbo-r?,00,-1 %1.'1�� 'DT'1'1 ; c:�OU'� ���1CC'�.`. a1Ci G�.�t�� 1�i'2 �10:1. '�V��:C�j i' �Si�:'Pri �•; a1
ir���l�il���� t.^.:.�_� CUu11�vi �J,rst�%:�rP f11Z.l.n�.'1 �'1_� lOJJ L..Cc�'"�uJ�i ��. ���Cr'.'.^.u.��:a l�?'�w1.1iV j
��
1ZO7.Jt� F�I1�. .L"t...' �'O _�'..�t1Oi1• .
Z!:£,V3 S�"t,�.1:..18r? t,}l� .:.Y'2.1'v '�!�. .-^.�i7C� I��'T! I77:. � F' � 2•0� C'.�:.^.�Y'' ;'. t � �
I1 l.� � �.1�. T].t'iil SOi.I
o� th�.; �i�ldin�,s :;3�ic'_n are ni.zor z.n nattu e. I�73V� not �o�:.nu an;,r
�U:;'t1.F7.Ca't10I�y1.I1 'i','s?8 _,Z�iL SS �O t�!�1� 't�'1� 1PrLL� 3LL'L�ii—c��ltf} Oi '�Y:�.' ��T1Z3 ,-��'E'�
is n�eae�. I•:ii.lzoL�t tn� "Iti;ll Bui1c�-out" it could be that the I�u.^�bclr,+,-
u�i�l�r� �i1��.l.1 a C�.�� T'%Qu.�.µ �Qv ���i TiCiCCSJC�.I. jr• .
I•'�r qu��tio� is t�-:is t�Jus-� c�r'no c•,�.11 Uene�it _�ro::i ti.l� Hunboldt-L?o,_,ard
:l�renue off-o:z r�.��?r� elnza ar�a - i'es; F�illsborotx�h - Yas; Upi er �an
I�at�o —'.���i �UY'� 1Y1�;2y,'.0 — v�l'�T T��'tt� �:; 2.S �01Y7� SOiL'�:1 �TOIa il`"?rC Oil� �"
-'nJG.vrv.�ia�F..�� :�vCi���:'.� �n�; �?'i�.:1.�_i1.�1.:� u ��.n1,7.� �rOtl _l�ry 1.i1 J�G..� �':^Gl��� • 1.��.'�.
�rlir.�ane rzsicle���s h3lr� nana��d to ��-c e� f and ozzo the fx�eet�raf TM�.th
little trJU.��i-C.' usin� o�r e.�cisting system. i�.� buil�?-o�.z�„ �n the ar�a
::est oi' t�le frecrr�,y iias Ion� since be�n co:�,�? ete�i a±zd t�i� need ior �.�.
on r�n;� �t :io;�r�rd ,'Lve�zue does ilot apr.�z;L: to ��e n��ce�s�sf.
In concl�,tsio� iL is n� -recluest �ha� the Hvr:ibol:t :-io;:ara Ave:�ue
on-oif .r. �,;�p ue �eleted f-rom the :�I:-c znd that sone alternate tnat does
not destiroy a��r �irst �esiden�;ial district 'ue iou.�c#. for access to t4�e
A.n�:.� ar�a.
:iJ?: a.�cs Sincerel�T,
%�IVc�..Cil�:l:<�iZv . //f''��
� �/i%Z��2��:��L ` • �// : �.C�
Ho:,:ard J.� ^xson
7i3 Ho;:ard �vznue
Bu_r? in�ame , CA q1��10
.. ._. ,,. „�, .. . ._...: • . .
. .. . ... . ,. s..c_:vi.i.+>,c.-.,..s.. , . �..:�.. . .. . . ., . _ .. ._�.. .__._.....-.. .. .... .. . . ._. . _.. . . . ,......._. ._ . .._
�,
�
.�
• ,.�
RESIDENTIAI USES INSTITUTIONS INGUSTRIAL USES
❑ lOW DENSITY uplo8 du/ac* � ELEMENTARY SCHOOL � INDUSTRY 8 OFFICE USE
� MEDIUM 9toZ0 du/ac, 1r )UNIOR HIGH SCHOOL � SQ SEWAGE DISPOSAI � WATER STORAGE
� MEDIUM MIGH Z1to50 d.u/oe. � HIGH SCHOOt .
CIRCULATION
� NIGH DFNSITY 51 plu� d.u/oc. b PRIVAtE SCHOOL prepoa.d •xi��in0
'�dw�llinp unie� p�r acr�(ner) � OTHER 'r CIIURCH "�" ,� FREEWAY
COMMERCIAL USES QP POtICE DEPT QF FIRE DEPT ��� ��MAIOR ARTERIAL
SHOPPING E SERVICE ������� ARTERIA�
-_ '- � CO qTY HALL Ql LIBRARY
-- - COILECTOR d FWY RAMP
—y,_ � SERVICE d SPECIAL SAlES pARKS � .�-� GRADE SEPARATION
' -�^^� OFFICE USE NEtGH�ORHOOD ����'�d 4 ��
. �� aislinp ,4, w.«...+..w«� RAILROAD
:::'
. _.._ ,
� r""�' � WATERFRONT COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY � PRESERVE � ........ RAPID TRANSIT
. ; �'.,,��• _ -� �. '
/�. . t ;z. _'--_-,_
. . �M� j.
••i' . �= — i .
..�,.. �' �
' ;9
`��
' 1�
_ 1�_4
' t (ii
�••�
.�
�� �
`'1
^� �
��t�✓ Y
.'
—�_� :� L! I�3 � f i 9t1i �
/ � : C T / � '
�/ ra�•.� /r'�^`
' \ � " '�"3
GENERAL PLAI�i REVISED APRIL 21, 1975 BY
STUDI�S RESOLUTION N0.23-75
c..� ��"%/._ t;: �' _ ��� �" ''� _
.� .
0
iiGLwI��C�
PIl AY 2 5 1983
r ' ' + CITY OF BURLINGAME ^
v �J�I �"',�f ;? ,, �/j� /.' � PLANNII',;G DEPT. ` ��,• �
%G�� . �' /�-c•G� / /,.!;�1�%%��`-�-`'� (.�G
.� �% �-- ^ • - � -.-.,,! ,, ,, v
� �` �' �//
, �� C �._.��.'.-c�..�
?-;,-
�G���G�'w ,��,�y�. �_ �. �
/ _�
f r_ ,) � � �G'�� •�.� L'�`�ti / (/" �—G�
.� G / .�. , . , �
�.��/ �� ��� , �� � ���� i cJ
L-�' C�t.-G - :� �-.x �' %�% �� � ' .
_ V /
.l ���� �, /��i
�-G�� ��/ `�%". / / '—�L�.�%-G .l'`�>-�� .
.
� � ���/`����' �', i % G��
t/
�%�., �.
L• ��'-?,�.z�..�'-,c��
✓ �'� � �-� � L��
� .� . .�
/! '` C� ,. �.- /—f�/ �� -'C���
��/ .,,i � C � �C/��G� :� J, �i
�./ ��-�i"c/ � %� �/ . � �
/ �� `" ., � ���' %'.C�E:�..� G, =-�� C � :��.�CC c��'
%"'Gt��� .�%`�--�T-�---�� � ' �—� � �/�.
.� - ' /%�� � � f .
, � ' (/ / �-�,L•L-C-=J,
'���-C�G'L--t"�r�-�`c'' C�G'G �� • � ,
� � � � r �� � /����� � t «��jZ��
\��` �i��L.�-�--�����-�4-.--� �G—=� . %
� , �
� / 1 /' r f �'' i, �.� ✓`-J/-C�.�' `/.0 '� � � , C�GGc_/f�
. /
A ��..,�� � 'i./��--�-'''�f--�—�" . �,�� s
l'�� ? �� ` , -i�` � ��.���-
G-e`�
� � i i ` C- ✓�' .%� % � ./
� / �
!� � � � ✓L•'C-i� ��i��L.�C.._,E.'� f / �
��,��(� � �.�G� �c.� .� �C, _ v ��, c'��c�y ���
�� 9 �� �v� ��/
��- ���c�� 1�---'�' �� � � J ��% . l/ : . � �' ''-G� �
s � �' h .'^ '" '. , i'f��—:r�.li��l� ���� ,_ _
�������.�����.�� �` �-�-� ` _,
� r. �_�-
�, � � � � . � G��C G- � �/,
��/ � �j ���� ' �i.i7'����� G t_C: .� �i
�G (/!/ �C'lj / � � ,� `'l . -
., .��i%�
- �c�-�c- � ��-C�i .:
�� G,�i�' ,��-�' �-l'�--G %� _ ✓� �
, �C ,�-��= � .
, ��...` � ,
G-��� �'
��-�-G( C�.l�/ � �; � � � ;a�-�
,.�1� �.�.� - .� :�_ -y�.� �i,C_ -G. � � ��-2 ��� �
� �.%�.�u'. ; � �� - � ��
.� � ` _ � ,' ,� � - �=�.�-� � M-�: �.�.��u G� `�-�C^
"��/��� fi_�-`'- `� � �?�- � �� .L- � �� �� -� -� - �-- - , _
, � / : L� � �� � ,( • ���� .�-„� �-� �, �-���� � ,
, � , ;� _. .�,- -���� ��
�,(�,��� ,�G � � y ' ; �u �'.� "�C-G,�'�'L
� � .,. / � _ � c ,� ' �-�- .
G 2�y/ �--�. =� �--'.L'� C ��i � � � .�� �.._
/� � � • �:� �'" �' �/C��GG``��L? _
/ / / ' ! n � �f � /...�' �ia;_�aH ��� �� //
/ ./ , r �% i i i ' _�.�-'�r-y ;�r' �--� - ./�� ,/ l ri
(�� '�''�� G./���' �L-''t-''C. � �" !%
� �? � � . �/� ���.i � /
, % •/ `/ � � �, �-/
( /./'� ���`i � .��t. ��� ��iG�7/.'i�k � ��.' '% l��C�� �.� L....c".�� �
]- C� / ,, /
. /
� ,,� / � � ,.����`�`--�;/ � G�.C�`� %L/
�-���.� ; % �/�.�._-�C �-� �
, ,
' L- % `�L.- �_.�-�'/ G�J�� -_���/ �-2-• /�' ,�'
� , .
, . , ,
//�� -, '�---G�-�� '
f1 / � j��C� •' � � •� ,c �i ��� � � � . l ..C.f-CJ
� vj�/ ��i y �.6- � C/ - i� C../. �
/ `'(-�' i� � / Ci ��/ "� !� ` � /
� � .� � ,
;. � :�; ;.f:• �,� ��;�'�� _�����`�.G�-��������
�\��,(� ��C-G�.��f-'� �%" / �� � , � .
� --' -• � �.�,
:.� , ��=���'�-�-�.
;� � �
�� '� �/�; - .�G� —f.�--� �-c�� �` --�: % • �
�� :��
i � . ' � �'� -� ��� =�
,r , � - .� //S� �
,�G'`'�c%.."% � -�: �..%:��
v � �� �i _ .i'�' �t? �-��,
� � �/ CL ',��-.; E ,�4�� �
�ti �-��'�; �--�-� f� ;� ��. � �.
� , , .�.--�-�,�-�_:__���
n � - ., ,�: `-��C--� ���� �
� ��� -�
�� ` V�.�.L� ��.� w � . v '�
/,� / / �
J i��� /�,a� . r j �i i'C/�' 1.���"/�1..�� , � v`/'%C��L/ ��f�"Z ��i� ?'L j %'
G� �/ / /j / ✓'i/-' c�t�� � � � '7
✓1't-G , � �� . � 1�-�--� �..r� CC,�-r`�-�.r�
.
.�,,, e�, /���-���«�`���"���� �, ' . --�
�-- ; �, � �- �
/' � ����,`-�� �:�-- j�� �=-' .
,: . � ��, ✓ �
°`�/�� ��-�--� c! -/ �-�� v C,!. ����- % .!: , �- �`�`�GrG% '-'�
�
,�%t�- ✓G� ����� ��� i' ��-�� �� �� � �
�� , �� , ,, ,� J� .��
„ �.�.�
G /' � n ��' �� -G��`-.__�-� � /ry�
., i �%_ GZi�y'.. �✓ %v / , % _ .
� ,j-• L �� /'� ��� / G'���
� s�= � -��� � � � " �
�� �, �-�� ; , , ;, �; ��
/ ' �� -�--2''--��", ��� ���`� ..� G', �'
'' � .� � G���
����s �-�--E� i�"` � . --
� r �• , i .�� �.�..,
� /�, �' ��_� � i��/ /`� �
C�'� ` r
� �✓G r �� ��-�i �-��-
-� t��" `�-"`
� `, Z/C�i�� ��-C' _ ; G,,�`-�2�
� � GC���� �- y., ��` C'_�� �-� i
�� c�f'/�% i`—���`�'' l�`'`� ' i
�
^ i ,
� ��,.
r ir
,,/ J �� l/ �'' . ��`���� _�����-- � � ��--G'��
� (��✓� / `'i � � � '�.0
,-� �%� �� ,'�E'�G.�/`�� ,L j
� �j tif i, �' / _�t�� ' ���/�—�'` 7'_`L'i�l�L Gv '�.�.� � l/
� - � ��" � �
. �
���� ��
��,C-, <%i���C- `.�—C-�- � G%-�`.--�C'� � '—=C_c_ �-� -� -
`.' !
�
��� � .�., '� /' �: /r ' � fc..� = � _—�.,�� ��t��,-�
(:iG'� i` � �-�r�G: � L'L-�' � � ' �' � �
' / ' �C� �'-�'���/-�` ;��i'��%
��.,i��� � 2G�� � �
, , �l
, , ,� �-�� %�� �-�f�—�v
,
,iu"�� G�G`E� -�%'.-�`' � ; ,, , ,
y' = ' �l-�.4`_-�� " -�"--G!�'�'/.
.�7., __-�r i'��-���—c.-�L-' •_._
•..._.��.c�� G`-�G �-�/ , . �
` �, c �
��� 3�� �f
; - �J� c% �
\ /
� �� " _.-/ -
r2r
i 5 � �-Lf/ � =c
�. �
� J
� ��
�V,l� c�
� � �y�i�� ��
r ��
l�-� � �� ' ���i ' �T �
�%��.���-�� �-�.,.���._% C�� C�.t�.-,�.�.���. ,� s � .
� ��������
. • `� �
.,�'� i �ZL��-a��-�.c��::.� ��r��' �
� MAY 2 ; 1983
� � ,�ri � . �.�'� ? `�'; � ' '
�L�-L,:� > > !�(, ���'/ v
CITY OF BURLINGAME
� PLANNIt.G DEPT.
,�/'� ;.�,C'[.-� �-�--C � �y?�.��.-�. �:�,�,,y,t�c�,'��
� , � � /
� / A J
�,���'L! '��-:�..: � T s 'i�� � /"�'��--c,-�=�f���-C" := J�G�- ��`_ 1� �_.�''_.
C /L �/ '
�i L.� � -
� • � f / �GZ-L� ��✓ / �'� �_//. ��'�v'�''�/�G'l./
, �-�w ..y��� �� �, _
������ �
� �/ � , ��=-��e:� ���
�/ � � - � �-�Y�-��!�� i ,
G���L��-i�.� GGi-'•'-�L� � �.�.-���-' i
�i �/�i I' �_��x'`-� �.�-EJ
e ' - ���-t'�• i'/' " "��� � �� ."'yc.� �t� -�'/ '
� L��� �� � �r
.�t/�� . .
. - � ��
� �� / ��� . , / . � �.-` C�.���� ��
�► / ' � � t`'//�-��J': �. ,
4��, /% /,G,;..��'���i�-G'C--�'.-� ( (/� - ��/� C�'� �
��« , Cf' � .• � �� � �-�`�`-
' LL�G; -C��-� �-E,-, 6'�1C.,� / G --
G�L�-C� �-.G.G�:/ i . /� ' ��� ' �� c�' ���
.L �� � ,� ; `�c �. � ��.� � �G �-L�` ,
. �- /
�--GL /` i� T �C -�/
//�"�: . i :.�� �c��>u�,G! ��? ��----� �-'-%� � 9 � .
/ � A �
� . �fGG���
` �' , . /',�?,� �GG �
�/�� `���� �� � � � ��G/``--�, �'�` ,
/ / / .���� � '
�/% � e �/ GC/Y�-��� " L , � ' . G�--c��-�GE`.:
/ Z���� � / �'/'���,� ��� �� /
/f � �G��2� � � �i��� �.
���G �, n L��
G�- ''`� � � �
� �-C-C,-,� � �C.'/�-�-�'�
/iy. •Q�2-�.� -�' G ` ( : ." �.
;� `" ` , -/ � , ,� G: � .�''--�.�,� i -�G -G/.
�/1 ,ii /- �� /�.G�.C�'.•G.% L..G.��•�i //i
. �/Lri L/. • ��} �����l�
' ,� � %� _ �.L� � � G �/1-=� -G�� �� � � ' �
\�-�. �t"� �., ,� :� �� �� ��% /�i���.
_ � � ,, %�C .���--��- --
.>�. � c�! !� ,.� � �, /
�[%_ ��'. L . � ,, ' � /i " � r �..�G't---G'�-- ~"--�
,n �! .�,���'���� � �G�'-i ,�
r,/ �.� �'t-'�� i � , � .' ��.��?iJt��-t��
� � � �'' /� � ,G �-�.��.- � �L % . '
`� ,�C*; �7 �' .t�-- � \� •� f .
� � / ,�
� , / �_I;(�/ -' -c % �C_ ��J �� �' L�L
l // � � �.i iy [..� �. l.� /G' l�/ " /:.rG',�- � `' / ; •,7 / ri
� / ✓ c.- �C t� f ' / /:
.� ' � ����i%� � �'r �C� � _' �C._���`-�C��a �.
���'�"� � ' ` , / ' �iz � � ' / . ..
✓� �, `� 7 /'' 't "Z�c-�V C..�'� V r� ��' . . . ..
G������ � �, ��
. . . ,� . . . .. . _ - �-... . . ,.....�.::1''�•�,.i%,
� �
� 1
. � ,
����� ��
,� , ,:
;�
_� %��—� v�'��c�C ,
�
.I�c..l� '�
�� -� ���- ���-
� � -�� � ���,�' � `v' L��.�.-L.,� �� � � �,.-�, �:.�:r�
' ,. ., t, �� �
�/%"�--��—r��t� �"G' ��2��—r.G�,�' G�� % -=�=—��� �
L -�
/ �
� , • - • /�" , � ,
�j/��',11�- ' ,%' �����LC.1c?�=��C���-'.i� � "�C— ��C�—� �
/ - r'
� /, C / ����
,. .�
��L����= '��- �' �'�-� �- � �
� �
:� ���.���L�-��-z�-�- � ���/ ��.�-�' /�,
�� /f -
-U , ° . - ,- �, �I
/� , .
� �%'�I`i•t�C�%- �;'✓ GL�'%-�_ ��j� 'v�'/ riC�' �.�'—C�G' J'r = ._-�..-
/ %� � � �
%
t���/I��.(��.� � �%"—�� `- � z//— �C�: ���.../ /L��—a'"L � ,�
� /
, � _�� �'
��� ��-�J,•� ,��� � . ���' ��/ � ��-�--�L � -�=% �• .
,
( � ^ � � � � �� /� C� �/�iL��� G'��G!�v
J7L��� ' % �i ����' ..� � u
� , .
�. , ' /
` � .:.`� �G�—G.G��/C�
����������-�/�i � -��
� i ' � �-�� ��
� ���.�2�'�`���� .� �! -. �C.i i
- , � c ��,�-�.�/ 4��.
, � ��. ���.�'-�_ : � .
.� �� .�y� � ..�"��
���� , �� .
�� , ., � , .i�.��-: �-.��-
��,����.,� �,�-��� ��
' , � �� • ,
/ `/ � ��� i%�'/��.��1'f�� `� ..i��` �
�`�JJ��►i , r � - .
/ �
. . /!�+ f. '' .
�/ / �. / `/
/�� l%./% A it L.�—�� .
` j:'/�GG / i'
' ' ���-c��'�
� � `'� '�� ��...GG%-�L:�-G �
�� � � � .
1' �• .�-�C�--C_ �-� :,y?��� �
C���
' _ ���,c;Y."K:��'- ^4
. _ . . . . . . _ . ... .. �..Jwi �� _,: x..�..r`:�f
v
�
���L��v��
,lUN � - 1983
C��PI.A�NN F G OEPTME
Charles Mink
Burlingame Planning
Burlingame City Hall
501 Prirrirose Rd.
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Mink:
Commission
110 Howard Ave.
Burlingame, CA 94010
May 31, 1983
We are homeowners at 110 Howard Avenue in Burlingame and are
concerned about the future of our neighborhood under the proposed
city plan to add a freeway entrance and exit on our street. We
have owned our home for 4 years and enjoy living in this location.
Last November we had twin girls and would I.ike to see them grow
up in this re-emerging family-oriented neighborhood. We are
considering expanding this home but will most certainly abandon
this idea and look into relocating if the freeway ramps cannot be
stopped.
Our objection centers around the increased traffic volume and
type of traffic expected, and its effect on the safety of the area
for our young children and pets. There is a heavily used park
one block from our home and Washington Elementary School nearby.
There is already more auto repair shop test-driving on our street
than we appreciate. An exit ramp would certainly be used by
trucks and vans servicing downtown Burlingame making Howard Avenue
a traffic artery and altering the quiet, residential nature of
our community. Please don't let this happen!
Also, we have not seen Burlingame improve the dangerous conditions
existing along Howard Avenue and its intersections with Victoria
or Humboldt. Therefore we have no reason to believe the additional
traffic flow will be managed properly.
We hope you will ammend the city plan to remove the plan to �
"construct one additional off-ramp from Southbound US 101 to
Humboldt and one on-ramp to Southbound US 101 from Howard Avenue".
Why can't people use the existing Poplar Street and Peninsula
Avenue exits? These are only a few blocks further away!
�
.. ,
a � '
Page 2
We will be following the progress of the Neighborhood Traffic
. Watch in working toward our goals.
Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely,
r_i1'`�`^-_x� i�;�t�.l.7c,�n
U
The Wright Family:
Frank L. Wright III
Marcy Harrison
Kate E. Wright
Whitney A. Wright.
Jackson (the cat)
. ,
A {
FOR I�lFORMATION - JUNE 13, 1983
To: Burlingame Plannina Commission
E�.�i�c5�9��
.J U��d 1— 19�3
I�day a5, 1983.
.
Dear Gentlemen:
CITY OF BURIINGAME
PLANNID�r, OePT.
R'e are residents of 9 Bayswater Ave. and have been the proud
owners of our home for three year s. The main charm of this area
has been that we live on a quiet side street somewhat removed
irom Peninsula Ave. and iiwy 101. It is our understanding that "-
there has been proposed a series of On/Off Ramps at Humboldt
and Howard Ave. Unft�ptvnatelp both these projects would �reatly
increase the traffic flow throughout the immediate area and pose
a serious health problem to mq wife Who has seriously suffered
irom asthma and emphpsema, as well as a safety hazard to my family
w hich includes 4 children.
Since the primarp concern is to help the developers who have
recently built up the East side tracts bordering 101 and since
most of their business is closely affiliated with the S.F.
International Airport, we strongly suggest you expend your money
and efforts to expand the Broadway exit to its full capability
and improve their Bay frontage road system.
Sincerely yours,
����tit�� ��� ��
J
(Alexander Ilyin
9 Bayswater Avenue
Burlingame)
�,,
�:c���VC�
�U�� �; - 9983
l�
ClTY Of BURLINGAME
PLANNI�'� DEPT. -
L.��.e Lz.�.� �.� �u�.�zxr��n�.�
SAN MATEO COUNTY � .
CITY MALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL:(�s15) 342-693�
June 3, 1983
Mr. Alexander Ilyin
9 Bayswater Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Ilyin:
This is in reply to your letter of May 25, 1983 to
myself and members of our staff concerning on and off
ramps in the Humboldt and Howard area. There will be
public hearing at the City Council meeting of June 20
to cons.ider amending our current General Plan. It is
the recommendation of the Planning Commission and city
staff that any reference to on-off ramps in the
Humboldt and•Howard area be tleleted from our current
plan. If you wish a copy of the staff report on this
item, please contact our Planning Department prior to
the meeting.
Please let me assure yo u that we have no pians now or
in the forseeable future for any traffic improvements
on the west side of Highway #101. Our current efforts
are for a new �freeway offramp on the east side of #101
about midway between Peninsula and Broadway. The City
also wishes to protect our residental areas from ex-
cessive traffic.
Sincerely,
�Y
�1SGRS� �r
�F
D nnis Argyres
City Mariager
fg
cc:l ity Planner
Public Works
� x �
n�
r�ay ss, isss.
, �
Dear ��f�-f'Ll S �"��C�S� .
itie are residents of 9 Baysaater Ave. and have been the proud
owners of our home for three years. The main charm of this area
has been that we live on a quiet side street somewhat removed
from Peninsula dve. and Hwp I01. Zt is our understandin� that
there has been proposed a series oi On/Off Ramps at Humboldt
and Howard Ave. UniDptunatelp both these projects aould greatly
increase the trafiic ilow throughout the immediate area and pose
• a serious health problem to mp w ife who has seriously suffered
from astbma and emphyse�r.s� as well as a saiety hazard to my family
a hich includes 4 children.
Since the primary concern is to help the developers aho have
recently built.�up the East side tracts borderin� 101 and since
most oi their business is closelp aff iliated with the S.F.
International Airport, �e stronbly suggest you expend your money
and efforts. to e�pand the Broadway exit to its full capability
� and improve their Bay frontage road system.
Sincerely yours,
V� �� �
����� ���
I �\ � � ��� i '/ .J .
.
, .. , � .
Received �rior to Planning
Commission public hearinq
City of Burlin;;ane
Bur' in�ame, Ca� i•�ornia
4 Pettinsula Avenue
Burlin�ame, Cali�ornia
t•�arch II , 198 3
Attcntion : rleg P3onroe, City Plan�.�r
���c
��wi:i� :�
MAR � 5 1��3
a �H�N��..�P7,�f
Dear r`e� 2�1on�^oe :
As property o��mers and residents of Bur� ingame and San riateo
we are very intereste� in the p7'oposed chan;es at the Peninsula Ave-
nue interchange.
GJe understand the Ci-ty of Bur��in�arte T•�i11 be the lead a�ency in
preparirtg an Enviranmental Impact Report on roa.d imp� ov�nents i.z the
Anza area at fihe request of the B?y Area Conse-rvation and Dev�lopm.�nt
Commission.
�Please advise us oi the cont�.ct abencies or person� involved
in compilin� this repor� so we can �irect atte:�tion to specific traf��wc -
concnrns ��hich �ve think wi.11 eventually ne ;atively impact our neiQhbor- �
hood. . . . . . ._. � - ..
_Yours tru?y,
✓�tZ ��'�i�,- f �-.�:����
ilarilyn Zlahaffey (A?rs. L1oyd)
� r
�.�(,,�.d�
Niaybe Ze Pinson
Copy to :
r;r. Tony Lopez, Seni�r 'rn�ineer
City of San P�iateo, Dept. o� �ublic T•Toizs
3
. �. - - . �\
��� . f� � • : . _
. .. . . -. ,";,�;?':-: ;y:•,j;•`•
.. . .•_ — •..,=•� r=."'`•,r,�i7'.
_ � r s+ s . :
. �,
. . . � . r ,,:: . . i. -:ra � t t'` a �'�`�io �y � -*N
�. . � .. _ . . .'-. ' ' . . ,.. . -. _ ... _ _`.J. J+. _�_ .'�'�`.,.. .. -_..�:`'.�`..�y.C^"�.�tr.�.V,
.� . . � .
,'_ ., . . t .. . , _ � . .' . '. � ..
,, , ,
U� ar �,'ei�hbors :
..-
4��c1�.1�t] t��L�-c�'�2- � ���.i�. �`zx�s2�..�c
/ ' U5T � .J�J<<P15'�
3�!� f�� � 2���;� ��
,�..�.
�closed� y�;u -•rill find a list o� thoue people c•�ho si�n�d �in
:�t our �eetin� o:t Sat. 1�'ar. 5. If information relat�rt� to you is
ir.correct, please Zet us k_n.ow.. .
i.'�sn't it e*icoura�ing ta see so ma`�y of our nei�hbors there?
Do �onr ut�ost to '�s?�r'e�d t'�e word« �mong tnose :;ho w�ren't ab? e to
att�nci, and hava t�eZ �;ive us t�7�is na'aes, e��.
Yo��'? 1 be tt2D7�� t� ':no:a �ae iia.ve o��tt�d an accaurt at Glendale
S� t•ri.t:Z t�e iunds �-�:u contributed in the am�unt of sone `io5. C�O.
Goo� for us: : . • � _ ; - ... . . �:�:�:='�'•� .
_ Ke�p tne enc� os�d list hand� so w2 c�n-all� k��p in�touch ��ith �
one �-iotner. It's �ise to kno:a SA'l0 is on our �e=.m.� -.Mee�incs •��i1? ,. _- ;
be ha*��nin�.z�_ e;�.-��ct, so if you �n�Pd a ride or ca� of£ez� on�, _ . -.. ... �
':roach outtt a7d ca? 1 so�eane c�-ose to ,>ou. . ':.., . _:.-:. . ::,_. .�• ���,..;,:<: ,;� . � . _ � .. . .
T�� le�t^rs ���Ta oorie out ta th� var�aus a�er_cies �and�'uoth �a� ��
Ci.tp o� Bl�me. a:� S^n -Mateo.'- T�le �re sti11. awaiti�g answers. .� ... . �
;:e 2x�ct to c�ll a m�etir;. on 3�,,r.. 26 `at 1:00 for. �h�rse ��ho •..- -
i*idica��d tney woa � d b.=- c,ril.lin�- to •oe an active �art.�:�r�,'o�ir: 2v�ioyborhood
Tra.ffic ;late�. �:e ha�� been a:�? � to ��t:.� ca�i'� o=. tae �inost r�ca��4
Ei� a�rt�i:�.i �7 ta au� ia��rests .st�i those will be dicrribuLed a� �h3t
�e?t??l�• �1C`1 �Z'O�D�b� 1 �:_.� 1 be h�arin, fro� SO ::e0'tl@ Z.ZL '�*P1S a^.O?^� :':'GUp
re�a�'din� future effor�s, etc. -
"•-'e :��v� -:?ade contact �vi� 1 the City oi �310 e. as p7-an�ed, to r�c�fs�st
� t:� at �he »u �:�-�our_3 tra=i ic ��it/entraZce p1�:is as t'�ey p�rtai� to 4he
"iull, bu :? �-Qut" pnas� of tne 4nza 4rea be placed on t�Air a��`�3a as � ,
st-udy itz�. �i� cor� b oup �vi11 attend thi.; meetin�, it is �io��d. But
i¢ pou, too, s�rish to �be tnere please let us ?c~�.ow so � cait. p��ser�t an �
orga�tized, u-���.fied, cohesive groua. T-T•�en you nhone vs, we'lI �e t�ore � _
certain oi tt�� date and ti�e, also. .- , �::: �:�: .'.� :.
� � After tnat meetiag, wetll. �p�ly for�sinilar atte3tiori',to fih� City -: .
, O L S � �: • _ � . �. . , . ' � . . ' - �a ♦ . Ct„eTy� � . .
- � • ._ . .� ' ' .st.� ,`:. �: ' .r'; . .•�s. .,: -. .� ... .L`y t _ .'F .� .
� � �- Ke�p t-=-ac'_: af pro�ress :�i.n tre Ax`Lz� :area�.by readzt� the �a�r. ���If � . .
d
�: pou' have anv ide�s, p12ase �:s:r^re� -t�e�n. w�.th vs. .=-lf ��o�u h�ar,so.aetf�in� �'�. ..�
. Re ou�ht to �rnaa, : �hoYta - n s : so ;�e c�-�i �":�roceect�.. er�ec'�-�.ve� •r: � r . ` .
. -�� -� �. : , r- y.� : �s �.�' . , : `�, :
7 . • . • �...�-�•�' � ; �:• .o-, �,; -. �.� �k _. ... .. . . . .
-.�
F:,zco: :--all oi you �ho� hsve`�pi?oneci 4Surlin��e. ��^ '3�e�'��e toT:c� � gour `�'` �
4V ..
�' n�-aes �:ave b�en put on a nailiZig list. :==-_Uery i�tnressive, en? ��
_ t _ � _ a=� -
1
. _ :.-.. , �- - - _w� s=,, : -.,*1 -
., .t.� :s: � af �
". So rzuch €o�, no;i. ` ~;�alte � heart. ��,'e ^cait do it . � t
. Y,4.;�-"';:.. �_ _ _ .
. . . . G ' ?. t -� . . � � .. • ... . . ' � �.: . �„: > .
t .e i
�. _. ..iayliell�'7.'i..�:� C31�7-5858j I�iarilyn.���h��ffy�344-°�57.
, ;.; < � ,:� '�t, ;:.;.`:,.,:1> . : • - _ . :;�:
. . . . _ ' . . . ���= �����w" _ ,� _ -
� � � . . • ' iy. ��' �!Y:�' �/�(`� .
' • . . . . V
� • ' ' � ..
a
�
�
a
� � � �
Marilqn & I.1oyd Mah =i fy 4 I'r=ninsala CB) 34�+ 9457
MaybeZle I'insott 90Q N. Hu�boldt C5M) 347 6868
Norris Johnson .-------- • 2� Victoria Rd. (B) 342 3152 '�
M& M Wal��r Swartz � 1�?02 N. Idaho 34�+ 1293
M& M Ric1c Swartz - 1000 N. Idaho 348 9578
Pete Tokarski � 120 Victoria Rd. CB) 34�+ 9761
Apne I�orris ,' 108 Pictori.a Rd. CB) 347 8815
Sam I�ar�. ,, .� 207 Clarendon Rd. �CB) 343 6233 . - �.
�ui
gie & Liberia Lubrano .✓ � 109 . iiumboldt CB)3 �,^ �93 4343CB) 343 75:8 �
- � � �(H�
Nancy Lindstront v 1I.21 Bayswater C.SM) Bus. .343 4542
,.' 720 Vernon Way EB) He�e�. 343 b880
Gil � Glenda = ontana ''
Howard J. �Pea_-~son '`�
angelo 2:oresi -
I��rti Knight. � � ...
J? ck iie�e
?tobt. Y� Catherine :�,7.viso
>>rlene Ir'unziati
:�ario t�farcucci
C. Carino
JoEllen �.lis
Angelino Betti �
Dave Pease
Alex Taso '
Fredrick Pier
Dennq x. ----�_ , �� .
Attne fi�ller
Nick �c Pit�llis ih-uley
i�'rs. A. I1nin •
Geor ;e Ni:ce
. - ,; :�..
. 17 Bancroft - Rd. ( B) '� 3�+ 0757
713 Howard �ve. 347 2874
508 Howard �ve. (B) 343 3559
._� 23 Dwight�Rd. CB)�� 3�2 27�4
15 H umboldt CB) 3�+7 7594
S40 Oak Grove Ave. CB) 34D 1343
125 Humboldt (B) z� ' 3�2 3313
1026 N. �lmldt C�'I) 342 2231. �..
k. �
. .- _ � �..r. _.... . _ . . . � -
ls xumboidt ��CB) ` �:-,-;;.::• :� . ----- � . . -. _ .
, _:,� :...._ r:� � °.�•-�::.:�� :
�-' •
. . .:�;:.. ,,,.. . ,;.., : . . . .
•: <: - . .: - -- - � ..,. � : . ... . :
� - • �, :31� � Claren,don Rd. �:=C�B) . �.343 3233 -
_•a.:-:^=:a -�.=-",iti„`w ".e..r��`;"-i:�'•`�'�.-�.s.»�...-.t � � a..TtX�c -�- `«.�:_. •->.�� -
- :ii5 x umbozat �d..:tB) .: .-::�':�a279 � . . � �-
1103 Perainsuia CSA�I) �.- � 347 6552
� - . � ;,t; : . _
.. ..,._. � . . ..-
. . .. .. . : . - _. .
� .
�1016� N. �Hz�mboldt {S3�i) - ------ : - � .
_ - �-•yR:;_ .; ._y:rz" -- ��-y::..:^� . .. . _ _ . . �
.. .�.. . i . . v:- . . . - .
- , - _ 91� -rr. Idaho _ CSI�i) :, � 344 5528 - - .
� . . - . . ::�<• . . :.
� .�' . 21 Arundel .� Rd. . CB � � .579 4b85 :
• 2?S Cl�arendort Rd. CB ) 31+4 1548
' 1011 Peninsvla tSM) 342 9675 beforP ;�on
9 Bayswater . . 340 9142
1035 N. ?1mnhlett
343 3780
• _ .
' . .. _ . �_�
" .
�� A f . `
, '
Joy (�ierber
Charles N�dashltovsky
Tony Kracke -.
2�.arci Harrison
14 �,rundel �d. 348 ].b34
912 N. Humboldt ( SM) � • . ----- .
101 Bayswater (B) - 343 I666
110 Howax�d iB) 347 676�
Y �
. . ..
� . � . . . �. � . . . � � _� .Y ' . . .
i
' � _ �
� �
� ,...,.; .
��. , ,, :, �e � � i
r � ' `I
�!
�:
'i
�{
that:
RESOLUTION N0. -83
RESOLUTION CERTIFYIP�G ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
AND MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED
FOUR SEAS HOTEL LOCATED AT 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD
��;'
,
... . ...,.:,>. .
.
:: � `•
:•�
"�.� = ;��t
RESOLVED by the Cit,y Council of the C9ty of Burlingame, California
WHEREAS, a draft environmental impact report was prepared for the
Four Seas Hotel at 835 Airport.Boulevard, Burlingame, California, and
( WHEREAS, said draft environmental impact report was submitted to
i
i the Planning Commission for review and subsequently submitted for review and
� comment b ublic a encies havin
; y p g g jurisdiction by law with respect to the
project, and by persons, organizations and agencies having special expertise ...
i concerning the environmental effects of said project, and
� WHEREAS, said Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on
, I
',S .�:' .�t�.' .
. 1•
Apri1 3, 1983, and by its Resolution No. 1-83 recommended the adoption of
said draft environmental impact report, and
4JHEREAS, this Council thereafter did set Monday, June 20,�:1983�in
the Council Chambers, City Hall, 507 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California, as ��
the time and place when and where its public hearing would be conducted •
concerning the environmental effects of said project, and said hearing was
duly noticed and held on said environmental impact report, including the . .
final EIR Addendum to EIR-59P dated May 3, 1983.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is FOUND, ORDERED and DETERMINED that: .. �_, �:�,.H
, . . . . .. . ,� `.i:..
1. The changes or alterations identified as potentially part of the `
project in the Mitigations have been or will be required, or incorporated
into, the project in order to avoid the significant environmental effects
4;
: identified in the Final EIR;
�;
�;
1� 2. If these changes are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
�'
�; of another public agency, they have been, can be or should be adopted by such
:� other agency;
3. Specif�c economic, soc�al or other considerations may make
,.
infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the �:
,� . :
i� final EIR; � `
. .; : s w .
, _ � . -4- , �,> .,,.
. � . . . . . . .. . , �; _.`:'i.. �[ , ,. r��y ,3 � �.. `
� � .. . . . . , . ' -i . 1� �� r.+. l�7uf �:
. .. . . . . , . . . � f _ . �, t ti yi. �4
. . , . ' � � l � � ' �,.,Ma} rT K -4 ,� ,�.+"� cy'' -�.�f � y, a`�.
� � . . , . ,. t . r* e .�.1` r'
. ;r �. r .,� , ,�� a r„d� x`��S�,k�,�"�•'� ,�;
� .. .. ... • . . ..___.. .. _. ,._... —__....". '- _;..y_... -A.M._.__,� - ��°��x '_'n.:_'w .,,:t`.�
l 1
•. , �
•.r
i� r
I
'I
!
i
i.
�,w
.
� 4. � That City shall noi: approve or carry out a project as proposed
i � �._':'�,�f:c..'':'
i unless the significant environmental effects have been reduced to a level � �
f
i acceptable to the City. � � ,�.f +
� � NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Environmental Impact .�,'
i
� Re ort desi nated above, inclucin the Addendum to EIR-59P dated Ma
i p 9 9 Y__ .._ __..__�
� ,
� 1983, as the same was prepared and filed with the City Clerk, is hereby
' recommended to the City Council to be the Environmental Impact Report required �
� by law to be made by the local agency, with the Significant Effects, Mitigations
i
iand Findings as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached hereto.
�
;
i
� _.
Mayor
�
� �
' I, EVELYN H. HILL, City C1erk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby
� '
� certify that the forego.ing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of ;
i� �
' the City Council held on the day of ,1983, and was adopted �
i
i thereafter by the following vote: ;
AYES: COUPJCILP�EN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
City Clerk
,..,..;
i =
�
. . ' . . ::T�}':•r.t - J�A'
. � . . . . ' . . _ . . . . . �_:.
. . . _ . . ' . ' �.. .. _ � �y, � - �,
. . � � - . . � �- � �.i
. . • _ �� r .v- � . t
- . . . � t,�r . .
' �� - _ ' �. . � ' � _ �. . -. � __ .. .�.:'_.
FOUR SEAS NOTEL
835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
1.
a
Height would exceed 50' limit
established in Specific Area Plan.
2. 80% of minimum front setback (30')
is not landscaped.
3. Site and cumulative development
in area would require an increase
in police protection services.
4.
,:;
�,,;;
�>;.. .. _.
Adequate water capacity to meet
fire flow requirements.
EXHIBIT A
MITIGATIOP�S
la. Grant a use permit and accept; or
lb. Reduce height to 50' consistent with
Specific Area Plan height limit, or
height consistent with adjacent buildings.
2a. Accept; or
2b. Require parking to be revised so that
front setback landscaping requirement
i.s met.
3. Provide on-site security services, and
to meet cumulative need add one police
beat.
4a. Project tvould be designed to meet
California hinhrise requirement and
city regulations.
FINDINGS
la. Height limit is a revie�rr line,
therefore there is no maximum height
limit in the C-4 zone. Proposed height
does not exceed any limits established
by the FAA. Building would be lower
than tallest approved but higher than
adjacent buildings.
lb. Would have less impact on adjacent
buildings and future city park; would
obstruct vie�•�s through site more.
2a. Landscaping is a design guideline
requiring a use permit, therefore it
is not an exception to the code but a
review line. Because of its triangular
shape this site has two frontages which
are affected by the landscape require-
ment, therefore some adjustment may be
suitable.
2b. Parking could be re-laid out or a
variance considered to pull parking.
back out of the front setbacks to
allow.more landscaping; curb cuts and
driveways could also be adjusted.
3. On-site security would reduce city
police staffing requirements; addition
of one city police beat would provide
effective support to private security
to meet the cumulative policing need,
4a. Meeting internal building design
requirements would reduce effects to
an acceptable level.
,
_ I
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
MITIGATIONS ,
e
� ' �
4b. The capacity of the affected water mains 4b. Completion of the study and meeting
would be determined and any improvements the approved requirements would reduce -
' necessary to provide adequate water the effects to an acceptable level.
pressures and fire flows made to meet �
the standards of the city Fire Department. �
�
Safety hazards to motorists
using site access roads.
4c. Install fire hydrants and provide
emergency access as required by the
Burlingame Fire Department.
5a. Redesign access from Airport Boulevard
at north corner of site to anticipate
realignment of Airport Boulevard resulting
from planned improvements.
FINDINGS
4c. Installing fire hydrants and emergency
access to city standards will reduce
the effects to acceptable levels.
5a. Circulation plan for Anza Area
anticipates a future widening and re-
alignment of Airport Boulevard ��hich
a�ill affect this site. Improvements
will be paid for by developers (Bayfront
Development fee) and by city. These
improvements are pr,obably ten years in
the future.
5b. Greater separation of service driveway 5b-d.Proposed improvements will reduce
and garage ramp on Airport Boulevard or effects to acceptable levels.
, operate as a divided road�ray with vehicles
entering only the service roadway and
exiting only the ramp driveway.
5c. I•f use divided roadway approach on Airport
� Boulevard, then service road and ramp on
Anza Boulevard should be operated/
coordinated with service road an exit
and garage ramp an entrance.
5d. Provide left hand turn lane on Airport
Boulevard for the service driveway.
5e. Widen curve on Anza Boulevard garage ramp
to avoid accidents caused by U-turns on
Anza Boulevard.
�'�
5e. Ramp modification would reduce effects
to acceptable level.
;
�
�;
,;.
;
.�
l.:�
�
7.
:
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
Cumulative traffic in area east
of Highway 101.
Increased demand for housing in
city and market area.
Seismic hazard to empleyees and
visitors to the site.
MITIGATIONS
5f. Provide left turn lane at main entrance
and Airport Boulevard or prohibit left
turns from Airport into project. If
left turns are prohibited from Airport
Boulevard, these vehicles could enter
from Anza Boulevard,
6a. Build netiv on- and off-ramp at Anza
Boulevard to U.S. 101 northbound.
6b. Widen to four lanes the existing two
lane section of Airport Boulevard between
Bayshore Highway and Bayfront Channel
(also see 5a).
6c. Install traffic signal at intersection
of Anza and Airport Boulevards as
cumulative traffic increases.
7. Give preference to hiring qualified
� permanent employee applicants who are
residents of Burlingame.
8. Build structure on driven piles; minimize
settlement of rest of site by recompacting
or surcharging artificial fill and removing
material in fill on site which can decompose;
develop ground response spectra and
incorporate findings into highrise structure
design, use on-site borings.
��
FINDINGS
5f. The proposed improvements or alterations
to traffic pattern will reduce effect
to acceptable level.
6a. Addition of this roadway and ramp will
improve operations at all three critical
points in the Anza/Bayfront area.
Improvements will be paid for by
Bayfront Development fee and city.
Thus new roadway will reduce cumulative
effects of this and other projects east
of 101 to acceptable levels.
6b-c.Improvements will �mprove operation of
entire roadway system serving area on
east side of 101 and are designed to
reduce to acceptable levels the
cumulative effects of this and other
projects in the area.
7. Demand for housing in city would be
reduced by the number of local residents
employed. This plus number of units
expected to be added in next ten years
and availability of housing and improved
mass transit access to the site will
reduce the housing demand to an
acceptable level.
8. The effects of potential ground shaking
hazard will be reduced to acceptable
levels.
0
8
s
, � s
�
,
E-�
�
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
t�later quality and drainage, surface
runoff and underground water.
MITIGATIONS
9a. Sump pump to pump storm water into storm
drains; elevate occupied areas of hotel
to at least 9 feet h1SL.
9b. During construction take specific measures
to protect Sanchez Creek Lagoon and San
Francisco Bay from site preparation and
grading impacts; prepare and grade during
dry season, provide sediment traps near
sump pumps; keep heavy equipment away from
the edge of the lagoon; monitor water in
sump to assure toxic contaminants and
heavy metal ions are within permissible
levels. If contaminants exceed permissible
level provide on-site treatment before
discharge into storm sewer or dispose of
in suitable off-site location.
9c. Waterproof below gr�ade construction for
underground parking facilities.
9d. Place oi1 separating traps at all drains
in driveway/parking areas or at central
collection point ahead of drainage pumps.
9e. Fill site to elevation 1' MSL to prevent
� ground seepage under the structure if
contaminants are found to be present.
9f. Intercept surface drainage from adjacent
solid waste disposal area in lined ditch
along western edge of the site, carry
to safe disposal area.
9g. Slope streets and parking away from lagoon
edge so that runoff will pass through oil
separating traps prior to discharge.
��
FINDINGS
9a-j. Additional tests could identify
potential leachate and methane gas
problems on this site, however if
these mitigations are included in
the project design�effects will be
reduced to acceptable levels.
� `
� . .
>
e
1,..
SIGNIFICAP�T EFFECTS
10. Improvements to the areawide
water service facilities.
11. Improvements to secondary
wastewater treatment system.
12. Noise increases from cumulative
development.
:;;�::. .
!;�:�.
�;,y .
,,�, :
��°-:�'`;:
MITIGATIONS
9h. Use sulphate resistant concrete for
any structures that would be in contact
with soil or ground a�aters; put under-
ground utilities in non-ferrous pipes
or encase or coat steel pipes.
9i. Landscaping materials should be salt
tolerant requiring a minimum of fertilizer
and pest control, sub-drains viill be
necessary to prevent root rot.
9j. Vent areas under structures to prevent
collection of inethane gas, protect under-
ground utilities with cutoff collars, vents,
impervious backfill material to prevent
gas migration through these facilities.
Under structure ventilation should be
twice that normally provided, ventilation
to outside for furnace areas, hot �rater
heaters, motors or equipment with pilot
lights or electrical rays should also be
turice that required by the Building Code.
10. Provide a new water main under U.S. 101.
FINDINGS
10. When justified by cumulative need
the construction of a main will reduce
the effect to an acceptable level.
11. Project will contribute a sewer service
fee and will provide on-site pretreatment
for liquid wastes from any area in which
food is prepared.
11. Inclusion of these mitigations will
meet the requirements of the San
Francisco Regional tdater Quality
Control Board and the city and will
reduce the effects of this project to
acceptable levels.
12. Provide pile drivers with shields and limit 12. Inclusion of these items to city
hours of pile driving to city standard; standards would reduce significant
build and vegetate landscape berms to impede effects to acceptable levels.
noise flow onto site; insulate to reduce
interior noise to 45 dQA; surround construc-
tion site with solid fence. '
-5-
�
�
. �
.
� _.
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
13. Irreversible environmental change
in use of nonrenewable resources
and construction and operation of
project.
MITIGATIONS
13. Project built in compliance with
. city planned densities which are
based on manageable levels of traffic,
land use and construction.
EXHIBIT A
�
FINDINGS
13. Because development based on planned
development of city the irreversible
environmental change caused by use of
nonrenewable resources in construction
and operation of the project are kept
to a minimum; although vacant, use
of this site Htill not stimulate further
use of these resources because the
available area for new development in
the city is very limited.
�
r
R
�
� ' ;
�;
:.
a
1
.'S
t.�,
�
7
•f
{ ,�
a
0
�