The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About800 Airport Blvd - Staff Report 11.27.2000� _ :l . i� . � ;� _ :� ,_` City of Burlingame ��.�_�' Conditional Use Pe�mit fo� Lease of Pa�king Spaces , Address: 800 Airport Boulevard Item # � Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 11/27/00 Request: Conditional use permit for lease of parking spaces in excess of required parking at an existing office building at 800 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4. (C.S. 25.41 (k)) Applicant: Todd Green, 800 Airport Partnership APN: 026-342-310 Property Owner: 800 Airport Partnership Lot Area: 1.73 Acres General Plan: Offices Zoning: C-4 Adjacent Development: offices and hotels CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 - Existing Facilities; Class 1, minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. Previous Use: Office Building . � Proposed Use: Office Building with excess parking spaces leased to off-site users. Allowable Use: Lease of excess parking spaces requires conditional use permit as a use determined to be compatible with the purposes of the district. History: This application was originally scheduled for Commission consideration at its October 23, 2000 meeting. The applicant requested a continuance to the November 13, 2000 in order to clarify the conditions of approval. The applicant then requested a continuance to the November 27, 2000 meeting. The conditions as drafted prohibited the use of the site for long-term airport parking. The applicant did not want to use the spaces as a free-standing long-term airport parking facility, but inquired if the spaces could be leased to hotels in conjunction with a"park and fly" promotion. This use would not be considered a free-standing long term airport parking facility, but would require an amendment to both the use permit for this site and the use permit for any participating hotel. The proposed conditions of approval have been amended to reflect this requirement. Summary: The applicant, Todd Green for 800 Airport Partnership, is requesting a conditional use permit to allow leasing of 23 parking spaces in excess of the required parking in an existing parking lot which serves a 47,700 SF gross floor area office building at 800 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4. The following application is required: A conditional use permit is required to establish that the lease of parking spaces in excess of required parking is a use which is compatible with the purposes of the C-4 zone district. When the structure was built in 1981, a restaurant occupied the top floor. This space has since been converted to office use. The parking requirement for a restaurant in the C-4 zone district is 1 space per 100 SF, plus 1 space per 1000 SF. The parking provided on the site reflects the former use of the top floor as a restaurant. The parking requirement for the 47,700 SF offce building is 159 paxking spaces, and there are a total of 182 spaces on site in surface parking, lower level parking below the building and in the second floor parking area. There are 23 spaces in excess of the current parking requirement for the office building. The applicant proposed to lease these 23 parking spaces to businesses in the area. Conditional Use Pernzit for Lease of Parking Spaces Proposed Use: *lease of 23 parking spaces Parking: 159 spaces for offices *lease of 23 parking spaces to axea business Existing Parking 800 Airport Boulevard Allowed/Req'd. Conditional Use Permit for uses which are found to be desirable and compatible with the purposes of the C-4 zone district 182 spaces 1 space for each 300 SF of office area (159 spaces total required) * Conditional use permit for lease of parking spaces in excess of required parking. This project meets all other zoning code requirements. Staff Comments: The Chief Building Official, the Fire Marshal and the City Engineer had no comments on the proj ect. Study Meeting: At the October 10, 2000 Planning Commission study meeting, the commission asked how long would the lease be for the parking spaces; how will they decide what business could rent the parking spaces; will there be a restriction on the type of use of these parking space, for example, no car rental storage, does the applicant have a tenant in mind. The commission also asked what would happen to the leased spaces if a restaurant returned to this building. The applicant has responded in the attached letter date stamped October 13, 2000. The applicant notes that the leases would be on a month-to-month basis with a thirty-day termiriation: They intend to lease the spaces to businesses within a short distance from the parking lot, and the majority of those businesses are hotels and restaurants within the hotels. They do not intend to lease the spaces to a car rental company. Planning staff would note that a condition of approval has been added which would prohibit the lease of these spaces to a car rental company. � The applicant notes that there has not been a restaurant on the fifth floor. since 1984, and they do not intend to return the fifth floor to that use. If that were to occur, the code requirement for parking would have to be met. Planning staff has added a condition of approval that states that if any restaurant or other use which requires additional parking is proposed in this building, an amendment to this use permit shall be required. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the properiy (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed �use, at improvements in the or convenience; (b) (c) the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the ' 2 Conditional Use Perntit for Lease of Parking Spaces 800 Airport Boulevard aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. . Findings: Based on the fact that there are adequate parking spaces available on site for the current office use of the building, that the spaces will only be leased to area businesses, and that conditions of approval have been proposed to prohibit the lease of the spaces to a car rental agency or for a free standing long-term airport parking facility, and to ensure that the permit is amended if the use of the building is intensified, the proposed use is found compatible with the required findings for a conditional use permit. � Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution and should include findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: Conditions: 1. that the project shall operate as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped September 13, 2000, Sheet A-1, site plan, and date stamped August 14, 2000, sheets A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, A2.5 and S-6, floor plans, and that 24-hour security shall be provided to the building and parking area should any of these parking spaces be leased separately to an off-premise tenant; 2. that the applicant shall lease no more than 23 parking spaces to businesses in the area as delineated on Sheet A-1 date stamped September 13, 2000, site plan and that it shall be designated on each of the leased parking spaces that they are reserved for the lessee; the total number shall not exceed 23; 3. that the lease of these spaces to a car rental company or an automobile sales facility for vehicle storage shall be prohibited; 4. that these spaces shall not be leased as a free-standing, long-term airport parking facility; 5. that if the paxking spaces are leased to a hotel other than for employee or conference parking, that hotel shall be required to amend their use permit to describe how the leased spaces are to be used by the hotel, and the use of these 23 parking spaces shall be linked to the hotel use permit by amendment to this use permit; 6. that there shall be no separate fee charged to the office building's tenants for required on-site parking and office tenants parking shall be limited to a maximum stay on site of 24 hours; 7, that if any restaurant or other use which requires additional parking is. proposed in this building, an . amendment to this use permit shall be required; and 8. that any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame. Maureen Brooks Senior Planner c: Todd Green, 800 Airport Partnership, applicant 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes VIII. � ACTION ITEMS October 23, 2000 Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. � Chairman Luzuriaga noted that the commission had received a letter from the applicant for the project at 800 Airport Blvd., item 6c, asking for a continuance to the action calendar at the November 13, 2000, meeting. He asked if anyone in the public or the commissioners wished to take any other item off tonight's consent calendar. C. Vistica noted that he would like to add a condition to item 6d, 1009 Burlingame Avenue, requiring a masonry wall between this property and the property to the east as discussed at study. C. Deal noted a business relationship with applicants at both 1228 Bernal Road and 1009 Burlingame Avenue; and he would abstain from the vote on each of those items (6a and 6d). 6a. 1228 BERN AVENUE - ZONED -1- APPLICATION FOR SIGN REVIEW AN SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DEC NING HEIGHT ENV OPE FOR A NEW TWO TORY SINGLE FA LY DWELLING AND DETA ED GARAGE (JAM AND MICHELLE DE A, APPLICANTS A PROPERTY OWNE ; 6b. 440 CHAPIN AVE , SLTITE 100 & 101 ONED C-1, SUB A Bl - APPLICATI FOR A CONDITIONAL SE PERMIT FOR A FINANCIAL INS UTION (MICHAEL NILMEYER 6c. 800 AIRPORT BOIJLEVARD - ZONED C-4 - APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO LEASE ON-SITE PARKING SPACES (TODD GREEN, 800 AIRPORT PARTNERSHIP, APPLICANT AND PR (�PF.R TY (�WNF.R � < This item was continued to the action calendar of the November 13, 2000, Planning Cornrnission at the request of the applicant. �• PARKING V� ANC A`ND RONTOSE BAC LANDSCAPING VARIANCYE OR A NEW 3 UNIOTF 3- C. Bojue moved for approval of the cons t calendar based on the facts i the staff reports, commiss' ners comm ts and the findings in the staff ports with recommended condit' ns in the staff reports and ach by res ution with the conditions for 1009 urlingame Avenue amended to re d: that the property owner s 1 provide masonry wall between his prope and the property to the east. e motion was seconded by . Keighran. Chairman Luzuriaga called for oice vote; 1009 Burlingame Aven and 1228 Bernal Road pass on a 6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining) voice vote; 40 Chapin Avenue passed on a 7-0 ice vote. Appeal procedures ere advised. This item concluded at 8:37 p. . The commission to�c a break and reconvened at 8:50 p � r 10/23/a0 14:55 HILLSBORO PROP -� 650 696 3790 R � 600 AIRPORT BOULEVARD • SUITE 510 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 T�L (650) 340-176y FAX (650) 343•8204 �`� l� Octuber 23, 2000 Mrs. Meg Ma�roe, Ciry Planner City o.fBurlingame 541 Primtose Rd. • Burlingame, CA 94U 10 `C�%�� N0. 284 ; D02 Cr �l� � �o .�..�3-� � � �� RECEIVED OCT 2 3 2000 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNlNG DEPT. Rc: Item 6c (800 Airhort Blvd.) on October 23, 200U Plannu�g Comrnission ConSez�t Calenaar Deaa• 1Vleg: Uue to � c�ncern over the conditions fot• approvfil o� the requested conditional use �et'mit far $UO Airport �3oulevartl,l would like to request that the applicatiora be moved t� the N�vcmber 6, 20001'l�nt�ing C:oiiimission Conset�t Calendar as an Actiun Item. T�aank you for your help ai�ci please #eel free to call me if yuu have any c�uestions c�r cnmmetxls. 1 r1►�� % � �'` 1 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved minutes VI. STUDY ITEMS October 10, 2000 1. 1443 HO ARD AVENUE - ZONED -3 - APPLICATION FOR A ANGE IN ZOIVING FROM R-3 T C-1 FOR AN EXISTING C CH (CHARLIE KAVANAG , KAVANAGH ENGINEE , CP nroe presented the staff rep . Commissioners asked: if th rezoning was to benefit future tivities at t church, what would these act' rties be; why do they need to r one, can't they ask for a sign e eption in the -3 zone; are there other ex les of dual zoning on a prope , even some with signage issu , and how were they resolved. Commissioner adde . regarding From the Floor th ommission should note to co enters that they cannot respond indicatin action on items raised becau the items have not been notic on the agenda. This item second unit esty, will be scheduled for a gular agenda and commission s can comment then. The pro' t at 1443 Howard Avenue w placed on the regular action c endar, for the meeting of vember 13, 2 0, providing all the informati is submitted to the Planning partment in time. This ite concluded at .22 p.m. 2. 1440 CHAPIN AV UE, SUITE 100 & 101- ZO A CONDITION USE PERMIT FOR A F1N� REPRESENT G CHARLES SCHWAB, AP�I,IC C-1, SUBAREA Bl - L 1NSTITUTION (l� ; PATSON DEV�O] �rT''PLICATION FOR CHAEL NILMEYER 'MENT, PROPERT� CP Monroe esented the staff report. Comm' sion asked for clarification the number of employe since on the plans ' shows a different number of mployees when you coun ffices and work statio , how many emplo es are in the San Mateo office ow will this compare to th , will they offer semin at this location as t y do in San Mateo, if so where ill they be and do they need additional pernut, whe will the attendees rk, how many will attend. Th tem was placed on the con nt calendar, for the Oct er 23, 2000 meeting providing all the information i ubmitted to the Planning D artment in time. This it concluded at 7:25 p.m. 3. 800 AIRPORT BOULEVARD - ZONED C-4 - APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO LEASE ON-SITE PARKING SPACES (TODD GREEN, 800 AIRPORT PARTNERSHIP, APPT.TC' ANT ANn PR(�PF.RTV (IWNF.R1 CP Monroe presented the staff report. Commission asked how long would a lease be for using these parking spaces; what would happen to the leased spaces if a restaurant returned to this building; how will they decide what business could rent the parking spaces; will there be a restriction on the type of use of these parking spaces, for example, no car rental storage, does the applicant have a tenant in mind. The item was placed on the consent calendar, for the October 23, 2000, meeting providing all the information is submitted to the Planning Department in time. This item concluded at 7:30 p.m. -2- , ,_; ( __. �,o ,� '.��f �.,� �, � � `, AIRPORI' PARTNERSHIP i '<.��'�:j � �.�. � 800 AIRPORT BOULEVARD . SUITE 510 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL (650) 340-1761 FAX (650) 343-8204 October 13, 2000 Ms. Maureen Brooks, Senior Planner City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Rd. Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Maureen: RE�E�yE � °Cr 13 z000 CITY Ofi BURLI PIANNING p�pr ME Thank you for forwarding onto me the comments from the October 10 Planning Commission meeting regarding our conditional use application for 800 Airport Boulevard and allowing us a chance to address the Commission's questions and concerns. The Commission is concerned about the length of any lease we enter into in regards to the excess parking spaces. We believe in allowing ourselves as much flexibility with those spaces as possible. And as the Commission was made aware of in our application, we actually had a lease in place with Red Roof Inn for those extra spaces prior to being informed that we needed a conditional use permit to rent them out. The lease with Red Roof Inn was a month-to-month agreement with a thirty (30) day termination and that is the manner in which we intend to continue to rent out those spaces. The Commission was also interested in our intentions to continue renting out the excess spaces if the fifth floor was ever returned to use as a restaurant. While we have no plans to return the fifth floor of 800 Airport Boulevard to a restaurant, we do understand the Commission's concerns and know that we can never write the future in stone. Therefore, we have no problem with the Commission making the conditional use permit contingent on 800 Airport Boulevard continuing to be operated solely as an office building. Although we believe that any owner of the building wanting to return a portion of the building to restaurant use would have to allot those excess spaces for restaurant parking in order to comply with City of Burlingame code, a restriction would ensure that in the unlikely event that either we or a future owner chose to make the iifth floor a restaurant again the excess parking would simply revert to it's original status as restaurant parking. Our location on Airport Boulevard is unique because there are so many businesses up and down the Airport Boulevard corridor. However, the excess parking spaces are going to be most desirable to only those business within in short distance from our parking lot and the majority of those businesses are hotels and restaurants within those hotels. Being that those spaces were previously rented out to a neighboring hotel, those are certainly going to be the business we intend on approaching first to rent out the excess parking spaces. We have never thought about renting to a car rental company nor has one ever approached us about renting out spaces. A car rental company would not have a desire to use our parking lot for the simple reason that we are not located by the new SFO car rental center, nor near any of the SFO off-site car rental offices. The likelihood is that if they were looking to use a portion of someone else's parking facility it would be a facility in closer proximity to their main rental center, which we are not. We are too out of their way for our location to make any sense for them. Once again, we appreciate the Commission's willingness to review this application and the opportunity to respond to their comments and concerns. If you or any of the Commissioners have any questions or would like to discuss directly with me any aspect of this conditional use application prior to the October 23, 2000 Commission meeting, please feel free to call me. .r .;,�� .. ! /A�� CIT O� . BURUN�AMi CITY OF BURLINGAME ��.� �- � APPLIC�RTION TO TH� PLANI�TING COMIVIISSION ��,..,� Type of Application: Special Permit Variance Other Project Address: �Od a9-1 Q.�o� gl�10 . „ Assessor's Parcel Number(s): � ' APPLICANT -�PROPERTY OWNER poQnT�4� �AN C�oc,D�i`f bV�i Name: `�� 'l �6� C�A'R7��4-dl � Name: '�6Gv �i-� �.T- +�-�i9�1J��11P Address: '�dDO �1'1YLPo� �UD .,� SfbAddress: � A��T Q�.. S� 510 City/State/Zip: gJeL.i��-rr�', �1-� City/State/Zip:.�1�I�Etl�m�� 1 A�-4ola Phone (w): (lQ�o� 3�6 ^ l�-l�! Phone (w): GtQSb' 3L10 -1�{01 �) � fax: � 1�50� 3�f� �-�t�2c�� ARCAITECT/DESIGNER Name• � � �i- Address: City/State/Zip: Phone (w): � (h): fax: PROJECT DESCRII'TION �) � fax:��S4L�z13 -`� ?� G� � �a� l�¢£'£� Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person � for this application. �3 AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct to the b st of my knowledge and belief. Applic t's Signature Date I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Plannins�r�imission. `Rr.o�y Owner's Signature Date ----------------------------------------------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ------------------------------------------ RECEIVEC� Date Filed• a' ��' ' n� Fee• �UG �- � ?��J�l Planning Commission: Study Date: Action Date: CITY OF BURL61VGAh�E R�ANNIN�G DEPT.. �Q �� AIRPORT PARTNERSHIP r''� .. a:� � ��i!� __ __ _ _ 800 AIRPORT BOULEVARD • SUITE 510 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 TEL (650) 340-1761 FAX (650) 343-8204 August 14, 2000 City of Burlingame Planning Commission 501 Primrose Rd. Burlingame, CA 94010 Re: Conditional Use Permit for 800 Airport Boulevard Dear Commissioners: When the office building at 800 Airport Boulevard was constructed in 1981, the first two floors were parking, the two floors above the garage were office and the top floor was a restaurant. Burlingame's code required the builder to provide more parking spaces per square foot for restaurant than for office use, which was done. In fact, as the figures on the site plan shows, the original builder planned on constructing even more parking spaces than the number that was actually built. Regardless, the restaurant closed years ago and the entire facility has been office since 1984. Thus, because of the City parking requirement for restaurant use, we have had more parking spaces than the code requires for over fifteen years. During this period we have had parking spaces consistently vacant and have rented them out with no detrimental effect on anyone. In fact, the availability of extra spaces has had a positive effect on the area by allowing other businesses to more easily accommodate customers than they otherwise would have been able to do. Until recently we were unaware of the need for city approval to rent these spaces, which is the reason for this application. We are asking for a conditional use permit for the twenty-three (23) spaces we have in our parking lot in excess of what code requires for an office building so that we may continue to rent them out to area businesses. Our building is currently compatible with Burlingame's general plan and zoning requirements and would remain so if the conditional use permit was granted because we are not asking to change or expand our current use. Further, our request has no effect on the building, landscaping or the surrounding property area because the commission would simply be allowing us to continue doing what we have been doing for so long without negative impact on anyone. , Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, 800 AIRPORT PARTNERSHIP R E C E I V E D� AUG � � z000 CITY OF BURLINGAI�E PLAfVNING DEPT. �� CITY O� � d�3URLINOAME �''�,.,m The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance (Code Section 25.52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. 1. Explai�t why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to pr•operly or improvements in the vicircity or to public health, safety, geneYal welfare, or convenience. i . � :.:r _ � � � oJ 2. How will the proposed use be located and corcducted in accordance with the Burlir�game General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? 3. How will the proposed project be compatible fvith the aesthetics, mass, bulk arcd character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? cup.frm/ll/98 1. Explain why the proposed use ai the proposed location will not be detrim, ental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicini�y or to public health, sa.fety, general welfare, or conve�zience. How will the proposed structure or use within the structure affect neighboring properties or structures on those properties? If neighboring properties will not be affected, state why. Think about traffic, noise, lighting, �aving, landscaping sunlight/shade, views from neighboring properties, ease of maintenance. ' Why will the structure or use within the structure not affect the publics's health, safety or general welfarel Public health includes such things as sanitation (garbage), air quality, discharges into sewer and stormwater systems, water supply safety, and thing which have the potential to affect public health (i.e. underground storage tanks, storage of chemicals, situations which encourage the spread of rodents, insects or communicable diseasesl. Public safetv. How will the structure or use within the structure affect police or fire protection? Will alarm systems or sprinklers be installed7 Could the structure or use within the structure create a nuisance or need for police services (i.e., noise, unruly gatherings, loitering, traffic) or fire services (i.e., storage or use of flammable or hazardous materials, or potentially dangerous activities like welding, woodwork, engine removal). �eneral welfare is a catch-all phrase meaning community good. Is the proposal consistent with the city's policy and goals for conservation and developmentl Is �there a social benefitT Convenience. How would the proposed structure or use affect public convenience (such as access to or parking for this site or adjacent sites)? Is the proposal accessible to particular segments of the public such as the elderly or handicappedl 2. How will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Burlingame General Plan and Zoning Ordinance? Ask the Planning Department for the general plan designation and zoning district for the proposed project site. Also ask for an explanation of each. Once you have this information, you can compare your proposal with the stated designated use and zoning, then explain why this proposal would "fit" accordingly. . 3. How will tlze proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics, ma.ss, bulk and character of the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity ? How does the proposed structure or use compare aesthetically with existing neighborhood7 If it does not affect aesthetics, state why. If changes to the structure are proposed, was the addition designed to match existing architecture, pattern of development on adjacent properties in the��neighborhood7 If a use will affect the way a neighborhood or area looks, such as a long term airport parking lot, compare your proposal to other uses in the area and explain why it "fits". How does the proposed structure compare to neighboring structures in terms of mass or bulk7 If there is no change to the structure, say so. If a new structure is proposed, compare its size, appearance, orientation etc. with other structures in the neighborhood or area. � How will the structure or use within the structure change the character of the neighborhood? Think of character as the image or tone established by size, density of develo.pment and general pattern of land use. Will there be more traffic or less parking available resulting from this usel If you don't feel the character of the neighborhood will change, state why. How will.the proposed project be compatible with existing and potential uses in the general vicinity7 Compare your project with existing uses. State why you feel your project is consistent with other uses in the vicinity, and/or state why your project would be consistent with potential uses in the vicinity. cup.frm/1 f/98 �. l. The proposed use with have no detrimental or injurious consequences. There is adequate parking based upon the number of spaces Burlingame code currently requires for office use. The excess spaces consistently go unused. The use will remain the same as it has been since the construction of the facility. When the office building was built, the top floor was a restaurant, two floors were office and two floors were parking. Burlingame city code required (and continues to require) a higher density of parking for restaurant than office. The restaurant was removed and replaced with offices. Thus, the building has twenty-three (23) parking spaces more than necessary by code. We are simply asking to be able to rent out these spaces to businesses in the area. 2. The requested permit will not change the existing location or use of the facility. The building's parking spaces remain compatible with the current City General Plan and Zoning Ordinance even after separating out the twenty-three (23) excess spaces. The requested permit does not ask for an expanded use of the ofiice facility. 3. The proposed use of the parking lot does not represent a change in the parking lot's current use and does not affect any of the exterior landscaping and current building structure. The request is for a permit dealing with the existing facility and the existing use (see # 1 above). RECEIVE� AU G 1 4 2000 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. 800 AIRPO BOULEVARD - TENAN INFORMATION DIIZECTO Y 800 Air ort oulevard Burlin ame alifornia No. of Employees Suite Tenant Business Tvne q. Ft. Occuuied Hours �est.� est. 304 Knox Fellowshi reli ious fellowshi 1078 8a-5 3 309 310 A.G. Seiben & Assoc. investements 1451 8a-5 4 311 Don Anderson Inc. romotions 941 8a-5 3 312 Robert Du an insurance 941 8a-5 3 314 Law Offices of David Lev law 1785 8a-5 5 318 Sk Service Airlines airline 1804 8a-5 7 320 MizBiz.com e-commerce 2505 8a-5 15 321 Simmons T.E. Ltd. im ort/ex ort 975 8a-5 325 Sk Service Airlines airline 835 8a-5 0 402 Allstate Insurance insurance 886 8a-5 3 408 Am ac Mort a e mort a e lender 1262 8a-5 3 410 uebecor Printin rintin com an 1835 8a-5 4 411 S ire S stems e-commerce 1176 8a-5 7 412 A lied Science Fiction hoto restoration 1366 8a-5 2 415 HRMG Inc. em lo ee benefits 1995 8a-5 4 417 E.Mediate Networks e-commerce 2721 8a-5 10 418 Conce t Sho in e-commerce 1176 8a-5 0 421 James DeVo consultant 430 8a-5 1 422 aw Offices of Barbara Cra law 1138 8a-5 0 502 Stonesfair Financial Grou ro . mana ement 2311 8a-5 8 504 Hosei Universi research institution 2258 8a-5 5 506 National Vehicle Leasin e ui . leasin 1529 8a-5 4 508 Medicus Venture Partners venture ca atilists 1419 8a-5 3 518 Texas-Ohio ener rovider 3111 8a-5 5 522 Barr Slatt Mort a e mort a e com an 2691 8a-5 9 530 Park-Salinas career counselors 506 8a-5 2 RECEIVEL� AUG 1 4 2000 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEI'T. � ciTr �,�. o,a BURLJNC�AME a, aw.. CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (650) 558-7250 800 AIRPORT BOULEVARD Application for a conditional use permit for I lease of on-site parking spaces at 800 PUBLIC HEARING ,� ��: Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4. (APN: 026-342-310) ' ' The City of Burlingame Planning Commission '� announces the following public hearing on Monday, November 13, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. 4 Mailed November 3, 2000 . E •: (Please referto other side) CITY OF B URLINGAME �y�� . � �.� � "� ' A copy of the applicat dn-an � p�an�s � ar th�pro�ect may be reviewed pnor to the meeting a� ��'lanning�+� D�partment ,at Q 1 Primrose Road, Q � e � ,. Burlingame, Cal,�rr�'i�,My n � �� .�,,� �r'.��'�.� ', � - , ��_�� If you cha ma��be limited to he �_t�blic hearing, � �� .�� .� �� raismg on�y «..,�., ,. �� . �..�.. ,�.��,. �.�.,. , �,��..� �..�r�xa.,., described i t�� ptic ,a��wntt corr�pondenc��le3.�a�er� d to the city , '; �' ' '• �;� �'' �'.�' °� �, �„� `� � ... , at or prior t t-l�e.��~.�p.t��U�li�� €��'"�� `��•-�. � � � . .. .. " � �. �. t � t:5 �. � f �,. � Property o ers .�. Q r i�e th� s��ao�i�e�e x�spo`wns b�1e�.�or i'forming their tenants abo t thi��no i ��`o ��i,� n�al�informatio � ple se call (650) 558-7250. � ank ��u � � �� :� ;�� '> �b� ' �,� � :� �� ; Margaret �o � �°` _ �, � > ,,� �,� � � City Planner �� ,� � `� % . �.� �' ��f`TICE : ; ' �'` .��R ' PU ' , _ : • j - (Please refer to other side) ; . .. . , - - '� ; � � .�s ,.'.:,kt ,�� 4 a` � �r � , . , � .. '. r r` - . .,'` . . �F � ... : :�. � ..._:._.�_�._,__.._.__..._, � �� cirr o.� CITY OF BURLINGAME , -- - -- -- - - -- --- -_ ._. __ ._... ... � ._..._. _... : .` ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( ; euRUN�AME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD � � BURLINGAME, CA 94010 I� ; �b,„��,,,�. TEL: (650) 558-7250 i ' I ; 800 AIRPORT BOULEVARD. . Application for a conditional use permit for �lease of on-site parking spaces at 800 Airport .Boulevard, zoned C-4. PUBLIC HEARING , i (APN: 026-342-310) NOTICE l , t . i , � + __-..._._ _._i� The City of Burlingame Planning Commissionl , announces the following public hearing on _' Mondav, November 27 2000 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed November 17, 2000 I� �: �; ; � (Please refer to other side) _.._.__.__.___. --- ._..- ----.. __�-_-----------------.__._...__.__ _._.. _ _ ' ' "_' ' ' . "' _' ��Y"�`��.�4rS'Ab#2.'�v�i �, ,� ��'v�'�. ��°��''��'� CITY OF B URLINGAME , , � �. - . A �, h A copy of the applica, ' rr°� �an r- � 1-pr6�e ay be reviewed prior �' � � ��3 to the meeting a� e`�,�� lar�t�,g� Depar�ment �t„� 1 Primrose Road, � R � Burlingame, Cal'� orrii'�a ? �� i � �� ' � � ' � � If you cha11 ge��s�,b �;ci ap�tcat�+�� (s� �n�o�z�`i-t� ou ma � be limited to �� 1 raising onl hose�ssues ��: ota�a��soz�ea''�ne e�se��a��l at°the �blic hearing, � � � ' �� , � � � � described i tl�e� �ic ��n�w tten�u ��pa d r� deli.uer d to the city � � ! at or prior t th�� 1i�� -��°+�� C ,� €. � � c� � � t �. ' Property o ers ho�-re i e thi;s�� ara�sponsi �� or i; orming their ; � �� tenants aba t thi �no i %�'�" t�� al�mformatio ple �� e call (650) �� 558-7250. E ank ;�u. �� , � � `w� �,,,, ': � �' '� � �,�� -�� F � � � � � � i i'+ � �; � . � �� Margaret � �Co��^m � ..� ��' � � � � � � � . 1 � .; City Planner L��J �s� �' . f ICE , ; . . (Please refer to other side) � � � _-- --- - - -- .f .:, r x.,.. .. . ; . RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a conditional use permit for lease of parking spaces in excess of required parkin� at 800 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4, Dorothv Jean Goldstone. 800 Airport Boulevard, Suite 510, Burlin�ame, CA 94010, APN: 026- 342-310; WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on November 27, 2000 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and a11 other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, existing facilities, Class 1(a), interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances is hereby approved. 2. Said conditional use permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Ann Kei�hran , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Ciiy of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of November , 2000 , by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY �� CITY o� CITY OF BURLINGAME BURUNGAME PLANNING DEPARTMEN' ` 501 PRIMROSE ROAD �Q:- BURLINGAME, CA 94010 ,�,�.�'�� TEL: (650) 558-7250 "'�_�,�:-�� i � ��-'_ JFECTI Q�1� �� NTRO� � � .LLf'1�=� .� � ��;1� C y'-. �i�1 NQV-v,�� 535 ALMER ROAD 200� .,. „„.,,..�,_, .- -- --- ., C A y �� izTrR !�i ��6�.��iit��C � 835 i083 t "' °" • Application for an amendment to an approved mitigated negative declaration �� ,. condominium permit to reducE the numbe E��''-•-• residential units from 7 ta 6 units for "+E construction of a new residential condomini,t,l�C O 1 at 535 Almer Road, zoned R-3. U 20�� (APN: 029-111-060) � CITY OF �URLINGAME The City of Burlingame Planning CommissiP�NNII��T. & Sus� announces the following public hearing on Jordan MandaY, Nover��er 13, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. in the 2507 15Tr.,Ave Cit:y_-Hal�--Council�C.hambers loca�,�,e� �:t,� 50'3�.,_. Ca��x:zl Ca. 93923 Prsmrose Road, Burlingame, Cal�fon�.a �:�i�,`"� - _ � :, � : `� `�, ,: t .. , Mail;ed Novemb -- ; u�� . , (FI � � , _ . . �.�., ._: t i'} lit'5 �'t 1�� }{ 1 i � S � .w "k'%' . � �+ . �1�:{FFitti {{:SESV', i!1!!F �t}?�!f 1..51 !!tlfT 11 f !4i�:1: � �,:;+ `I CITY -OF .8 URLINGAME ��,:, A copy of the applic� to the meeting at �:� Burlingame, Calzfoi-rii F��,, � If you chal raising onl� described i at or prior t Property c tenants ati 558-7250. Margaret M7 "`City Planner ��arid�alans`:forth"is pro�ec��may be reviewed prior Platinz�i� Departinent ,at =501 Primrose Road, `, � � � ,��, the subject appiication(s) in court;�you m� .. . issues;yott a= someone else raised at the ,p �otice ar.,in written,corre�po;idence delive� �ubli� hearin� .. _ .�, � _., 'p^ '` .—. �. `� . . .. 8�e� �'" ^ �ho::r`eceive tl�is notice are respoiisrbl� for ii s'no�ice: ,,For ac3ditional:information; ple; � you. � r � .�, � €.. �. ' '" k �` n } ' � .; :' ' -.^� � M.„ - `� ;'� � �,�.� n < �.� �` . f� � w. , v . . .�. . t�. �;> �� y limited to ic hearing, to the city ming their call (650) ' I . _- EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval categorical exemption and conditional use permit 800 Airport Boulevard effective December 4, 2000 � 1. that the project shall operate as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped September 13, 2000, Sheet A-1, site plan, and date stamped August 14, 2000, sheets A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, A2.5 and S-6, floor plans, and that 24-hour security shall be provided to the building and parking area should any of these parking spaces be leased separately to an off-premise tenant; 2. that the applicant shall lease no more than 23 parking spaces to businesses in the area as delineated on Sheet A-1 date stamped September 13, 2000, site plan and that it shall be designated on each of the leased parking spaces that they are reserved for the lessee; the total number shall not exceed 23; 3. that the lease of these spaces to a car rental company or an automobile sales facility for vehicle storage shall be prohibited; 4. that these spaces shall not be leased as a free-standing, long-term airport parking facility; 5. that if the parking spaces are leased to a hotel other than for employee or conference parking, that hotel shall be required to amend their use permit to describe how the leased spaces are to be used by the hotel, and the use of these 23 parking spaces shall be linked to the hotel use permit by amendment to this use permit; 6. that there shall be no separate fee chaxged to the office building's tenants for required on-site parking and office tenants parking shall be limited to a maximum stay on site of 24 hours; 7. that if any restaurant or other use which requires additional parking is proposed in this building, an amendment to this use permit shall be requirecl; and . 8. that any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 1998 Edition as amended by the City'of Burlingame. 6� �� ,a� . �iJ F"RAtJ Ct �C.O ��! y,.y i � r � `,s-.�.,54 �wi. '". � �� T �,h � .._. -. � .-. .-. : � � _,�..� _ .`+r �f'� _ o , y . w . ., ""Z k '�� t e. � _ � . -5,.., e.�, � ' < ��....�.--�� .;.« --.-9.-� s— t� � E "*� w+�"�}'� `" � �.. 4 "':•-ge-:c#.��. rr s. , , � . . . . _ - --, �. .a� _s,r � � _ ' � � -- — � '�`' '�S. . . , . .�. � � � � . � .� � . �q . , �. �� , , � � , �.,� � �. ,...._"'t ,�,,;:� � � � �, � 2,.,,, ` � �{ �� -��z-,'�=-� C�'� �.� v �� ° -�'�� i��. � .� � �' � � •� �j � � , •� dl'►'� � � � � �,., T � � ... .- f � � �� • �It� . � 9 �� r .B _..' . . f � ��, KK�� ` i $^ � 4 � � � '� � • • � :. R �: . .. � �. � .. _ .. �. s � .- ., i � , v �� . .3 �" � � x�.,�' � �'"� : �. . �« �. . . , . � Q u . � ,�� . _. _ � , . �� r� � �� , �'�,O el�„� '� t' � x� �k ��'� f �i�p�nt(Ilsi��iN�n,a � � ,. � _ � ��riruu i ��. �' `� � �- � ' 14 +qlliiiix . � � F��. r� �� b ' ��' � �� €� � ` "� � liil IIIIIS{ , . � � �� r� ii ia t�//�� 111F It II�IIE � � "� ,�� Il) • 6 �� 3'! � . � . �` ,I II� )I Il�llirl,l�� ,. � �� `:e �� . , � .. � �$� � �. �� —��irr�.�..� 40 � Y � . , V �� _ ._ `. � �5,� '� ( ' �¢ ' -„ .,, _ � , ,._ � " � � -{.�, . ,., � :�:� r �ii�.,,r.r�,�„ -sr � —� , � � w - 4�� , � . ��, •�► � • � � �i � s., �, 4. '�'�,�►. �-�,� w. � �, � _ � � � . � � y� _ , � F, Y� ' � 'Ey � �: �� '. � � �, � 3 � "'9► �� ` ra� `� .., �,�r � � T�. �. ; �.��, - � � �� _. . �� , -� �.,�� ., �' - � � � �� n.'� V ..� ,Ir �, ,� � �� 3 �� ,�54 �%� ,.d F. �:� ,, �.�� .� ,, , � . .- � �. �. � :r �a Y� �2� , � ��- � � ., . �,,� �, '�+�"� � ��.� i4 �� n� ��s�r� � � �� :c. �. �� i � ----�-�-----� ,