The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About777 Airport Blvd - Staff Report 3.22.1999t ;� � ; � � �.:.� rt.:. , , � .z r. , t, •, City of Burlingame Parking Variances and Conditional Use Permit to Convert Conference Facilities to 13 Hotel Rooms Address: 777 Airport Boulevard � ITEM #�� Meeting Date: 3/22/99 Request: Parking variances for number of parking spaces (201 spaces provided; 213 spaces required) and for numb�er of compact spaces (94 compact spaces provided; 37 compact spaces allowed); and a conditional use permit to allow a density of 69 rooms per acre (65 rooms per acre is the maximum allowed by the Specific Area Plan) to convert 5000 SF of conference facilities to 13 hotel rooms at 777 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4. (C.S. 25.70.034, 25.70.040 & 25.70.044) Applicant: Michael Roach, Marchetti Construction, Inc. Property Owner: Red Roof Inns Inc. Lot Area: 3.08 Acres Burlingame Bayfront Specific Area Plan: Hotels/Motels Adjacent Development: Hotels, Offices, Vacant Land CEQA Status: Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: APN: 026-344-130 Zoning: C-4 15301 - Existing Facilities, Class 1(a), Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances. Previous Use: 200-room hotel with conference facilities and restaurant Proposed Use: 213-room hotel with restaurant Allowable Use: I3otels and Restaurants are permitted in the C-4 zone district; density in excess of 65 rooms per acre requires a conditional use permit. History: In 1980, the City Council approved a project at this site for development of a 214-room hotel with a restaurant, which was required to have 214 parldng spaces. The project was to be built in phases. In 1984, permits were issued for Phase II, which had been revised to include a total of 200 rooms and 5000 SF of conference rooms on the fifth floor. 200 parking spaces were required at that time. Summary: The applicant, Michael Roach, Marchetti Construction, Inc., is requesting parking variances and a conditional use permit to allow conversion of 5000 SF of conference facility space to 13 hotel rooms at the existing Red Roof Inn at 777 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4. No changes are proposed to the footprint or envelope of the building. The parking lot will be restriped to provide 201 pazking spaces by increasing the number of compact stalls. The following applications are required: 1. A parking variance is required for providing 201 parking spaces where 213 spaces are required; 2. A parking variance is required for providing 94 compact parking spaces (42%) where 37 compact spaces (20%) are the maximum allowed; A conditional use permit is required for increasing the density to 69 hotel rooms per acre where 65 rooms per acre is the maximum allowed by the Burlingame Bayfront Specific Area Plan; and 4. Approval of a traffic allocation for an additional 4 rooms per acre (69 rooms per acre requested; 65 rooms per acre allowed). .' � '� PARKING VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 777 Airport Boulevard Traf�c Allocation and Compliance with the Burlingame Bayfront Specific Area Plan: The Burlingame Bayfront Specific Area Plan speciiied development densities are derived by computing the traffic which would be generatetl by different land uses. Hotels are limited to a density of 65 rooms per acre. The existing Red Roof Inn at 200 rooms has a room per acre density of 65. The originally approved hotel in 1980 before the adoption of the Burlingame Bayfront Specific Area Plan had 114 rooms with a density of 69.5 rooms per acre; when Phase II was built out in 1984 only 200 rooms were built at 65 rooms per acre. The proposed 13-room conversion of space at the existing 200-room hotel on 3.08 acres results in a density of 69 hotel rooms per acre, and exceeds the density requirement of the specific azea plan. If the Commission determines to approve the project, the action will also include approval of an additional traffic allocation for the net increase of 4 rooms per acre over the rooms per acre of the existing hotel. ' The proposed hotel conversion is projected to generate an additional 7 p.m. peak hour trips. This proposal will exceed the trafiic allocation allotted for this site (at 65 rooms per acre) by the 7 trips during the p.m. peak hour. The projected intersection capacity consumed by this project and the total projected consumed capacities for the three key intersections in the Anza area based on existing and currently approved projects and this proposal are listed in the table below. This analysis of consumed capacity includes the traffic allocations granted for the office building at 577 Airport Boulevard, for the hotel development at 765 Airport Boulevard, the hotel expansion at 835 Airport Boulevard, and the hotel expansion at 600 Airport Boulevard. It should be noted that the office proposal at 577 Airport Boulevard has been developed at a density of 0.46 FAR, where the Speciiic Area Plan allows development of up to 0.9 FAR. Therefore, there is a surplus of peak hour vehicle trips from this site in the trafiic analyzer. Some of this surplus could be considered to offset the excess of 7 p.m. peak hour trips generated by this project as it was for the excess if 36 p. m. peak hour trips generated by the addition to the Doubletree Hotel, and the 87 p. m. peak hour trips generated by the hotel expansion at 600 Airport Boulevard. There is also an� application under consideration to add 9936 SF of office space at 851 Burlway Road, for a total azea of 76,331 SF (0.93 FAR). This other proposal would exceed its traffc allocation (at 0.9 FAR) by 4 p.m, peak hour trips. If both of these applications are approved, 36 % of the surplus will be used. Capacity Consumed - Existing + Approved Projects Bayshore Hwy/US 101 Bayshore Hwy./Airport Airport/Coyote Point 71.3 % 79.02 % 64.05 % Capacity Consumed - This Project 0.07 % 0.03 % 0.06% Capacity Consumed - 851 Burlway 0.23 % 0.44 % 0.05 % Total Consumed Capacity 71.60% 79.49 % 64.16% The expanded hotel will be open 7 days a week, 24 hours per day. There will be 27 full-time employees and 3 part-time employees before 5:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 13 full-time employees and 1 part-time employee after 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. On weekends, there will be 27-full time employees and �8 part- time employees before 5:00 p.m., and 13 full-time employees and 2 part-time employees after 5:00 2 i � I� t PARKING VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7�7 Airport Boulevard p.m. There will be a maximum of 250 employees and customers on site at any one time. The numbers of employees is expected to stay the same in 5 years. There are two airport shuttle vans which will be parked on site. No other trucks or service vehicles are expected to pazk on the site for this business. Proposed Use: 213-room hotel with restaurant' Parking: Compact Parking Spaces: *201 spaces *94 (46. 8 %) Existing 200-room hotel, 5000 SF conference space and restaurant 200 spaces 30 (15 %) Allowed/Req'd. Hotel & Restaurant permitted in C-4; conditional use permit required for density > 65 rooms/acre space for each hotel room = . 213 spaces 37 spaces (20 %) allowed * Parking Variances for 12 spaces (201 spaces proposed; 213 spaces required) and for percentage of compact spaces (46. 8%(94) requested; 20 %(37) allowed) . 'No additional parking spaces for the restaurant have ever been required on this site. This project meets all other zoning code requirements. Staff Comments: The Chief Building Ofiicial notes (December 22, 1998 memo) that the applicant shall indicate rooms which aze a) fully accessible, b) have roll-in showers, and c) are equipped for the hearing impaired. The Fire Marshal and the City Engineer had no comments on the project. Planning staff would note that the City Engineer had requested that the applicant provide information on the impact of the conversion on the city's sanitary sewer system. The applicant provided information which shows that the increase in sewer flows will be minimal, and the existing sanitary sewer system can accommodate this increase. Study Meeting: At the March 8, 1999 Planning Commission study meeting, the commission asked several questions regarding the proposed parking layout. The applicant has responded in the attached letter date stamped March 15, 1999. The commission noted that on Sheet A0.1, it indicates that 179 parking spaces are being provided, staff report says 201, do the plans need to be revised. Staff would note that as shown on the last line of the Parking Summary on Sheet A0.1 date stamped December 12, 1999, a total of 201 parking spaces are provided on site for both the restaurant and the hotel. The parking summary divides the spaces between parking for the hotel and for the restaurant. The commission asked if the variance request is based on having 85 compact parking spaces. Staff would note that the actual number of compact spaces requested by the applicant is 94 spaces or 46.8 %; there was an error in the staff report for the study session. The applicant notes that the revised parking plan with 201 spaces was achieved by providing 94 compact spaces. The commission asked if the applicant had looked at using unistall pazking spaces (8 '/z' x 19"), and if there are any opportunities to replace landscaping with parking area. The applicant has proposed two different parking schemes , Scheme 1 with modiiied planter areas and Scheme 2 with 127 unistall spaces and modiiied planter azeas (see attachment to letter date stamped March 15, 1999). Scheme 1 3 , � � . PARKING VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL 'USE PERMIT 777 Airport Boulevard acheives a total of 204 parking spaces (103 standard, 94 compact (46.8 %) and 7 disabled accessible) by deleting some planter areas. In Scheme 2, the parking lot would be restriped using a combination of regular stalls and unistalls and by deleting some planter areas. This results in a total of 201 spaces (127 unistall (63 %) and 74 standard parking spaces) which is the same number achieved by proposing 94 compact spaces. Staff would note that these schemes have not been reviewed for compliance with the landscape standards of the Burlingame Bayfront Specific Area Plan. A change in the landscape areas may require a conditional use permit to vary from these landscape standards. The application as submitted is not proposing any changes to the landscaped areas. The commission asked for a chart showing the number of standard, compact and disabled accessible parking spaces provided and required by code. This is shown on the following table: PROPOSED & REQUIltED PARKING - 777 AIIZPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED PARKING Standard Compact Disabled Accessible Total 100 94 7 201 REQUIRED PARKING � 166 40 (based on total of 7 213 213; 37 are allowed for 201 spaces) * *percent of compact based on total parking spaces provided. The commission asked for the average percentage of occupancy of rooms in the hotel and how many cars did the conference room space generate as opposed to the number of cars generated by the use of the azea as hotel rooms. The applicant notes that since Red Roof Inns purchased the property in 1994, the conference room space has not been used. An administrative employee that formerly worked for Days Inn when the conference rooms were used estimates that the conference rooms were used on an average of three times a week and generated about 100 cars per event. This results in an average of 42 cars per day for conference activities. The applicant notes that the average percentage of occupancy of rooms in the hotel is 76%. � The commission also asked what happens if hotel guests park in the spaces designated for public access parking. The applicant states that the agreement with the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) states that hotel guests�have priority on the parking spaces. Findings for a Variance: In order to grant a variance the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property'(Code Section 25.54.020 a-d): (a) there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved that do not apply generally to property in the same district; 4 ' PARKING VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 777 Airport Boulevard (b) the granting of the application is necessary for the,preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship; � � (c) the granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to prqperty or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare or convenience; " (d) that the use of the property will be compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and chazacter of existing and potential uses of properties in the general vicinity. Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property (Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. � Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution and should include iindings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: Conditions: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped December 16, 1998, Sheets A0.1, A1.1, A3.1 and A3.2, with 201 parking spaces provided, 94 of which are compact; 2, that the hotel shall continue to provide a 24-hour airport shuttle service, which includes connections to Caltrain to accommodate employees during shift changes; 3. that guests, visitors or employees may not be charged for the use of on-site parking without amendment to this use permit, this would include valet parking arrangements; 4. that long term airport parking for a fee or no fee shall not occur at this site (including "sleep, park & fly" promotions) without amendment to this permit; 5 . , � PARKING VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 777 Airport Boulevard 5. that no room in the hotel shall be leased to a single individual, company or corporate entity for more than 29 days and no rooms and/or any part of the building shall be leased for permanent residential purposes except that the hotel manager may live on the site; 6. that small delivery trucks or vans with periodic deliveries may be on site during operating hours, and no trucks shall be stored or parked on site continuously throughout the day or overnight; and 7. that any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame. Maureen Brooks Planner � c: Michael Roach, Mazchetti Construction, Inc., applicant 777airpo. sr � City of Burlingame P[anning Commission Minutes Mnrch 8, 1999 a proposed for this frontage now and in th future; show drawings of the ground sign it is not cle r that the foundation is wholly below gra e. There were no further questions and the item was et for public hearing on March 22, 1999, roviding all the information is into the Planning Depa ent in time. APPLICA ION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A CO ITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXTEND THE HOU OF OPERATION FOR A NON-AUTO LATED BUSINESS WITH TAKE- OUT SERVI AT 224 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZON C-2, SUBAREA D. (JORGE SALDANA AP ICANT AND FRANK LEMOS PROPER Y OWNER CP Monroe summariz the project briefly and the Commissioners ed: include the minutes from all previous Plannin Commission and Council actions on this pr 'ect in the next packet; item number 7 from applic t indicates that they will provide private o-street parking for employees, where; would like see a letter from the lessee and the terms o the arrangement for the off-street parking; increase umber of employees to 10, how many more ustomers will come to the site; applicants letter cite other pizza parlors that open at 11 am, do � me of these have conditional use permits and what a the limits on their hours; received a complaint from the Chamber of Commerce about the abuse chamber parking be delivery vehicles, a continual enforcement problem for chamber because of e high turnover of delivery personnel, applicant should address. There were no further questio s and the item was set for public hearing on March 22, 1999, providing all the information is into the Planning Department in time. APPLICATION FOR PARKING VARIANCES FOR NUMBER OF SPACES AND NUMBER � OF COMPACT SPACES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXCEED THE DENSITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BURLINGAME BAYFRONT SPECIFIC AREA PLAN TO �CONVERT EXISTING CONFERENCE FACILITIES TO 13 HOTEL ROOMS AT 777 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, ZONED C-4: (MICHAEL ROACH, MARCHETTI CONSTRUCTION, INC. , APPLICANT AND RED ROOF INNS, INC. , PROPERTY OWNER) CP Monroe summarized the project briefly and the Commissioners asked: is the variance request for 201 parking spaces based on having 85 compact parking spaces; provide a table showing the number of standard, compact, disabled accessible parking spaces provided and required by code; have they looked at using uni-stalls, would there be any gain in number; are there any opportunities to replace landscaping with hard scape/parking area; sheet A0.1 indicates that they are providing 179 parking spaces, staff report says 201, do plans need to be revised; what is the average percentage of occupancy of rooms in the hotel; what happens if hotel guests park in the parking spaces designated for public access parking; converting conference room space to hotel rooms, how many parked cars did the conference room space generate compared to the number of cars generated by the use of the square footage as hotel rooms. There were no further questions and the item was set for public hearing on March 22, 1999, providing all the information is into the Planning Department in time. -4- HETTI CONSTRUCTION INC. Construction Management General Contractors March 12, 1999 Ms. Margaret Warne Monroe, City Planner The City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010-3997 Re: Red Roof Inn 777 Airport Boulevard Burlingame, California In response to the Planning Commission's questions, the following responses are provided. 1. Is the variance based on having 85 compact parking spaces? Yes 2. Provide a table showing parking spaces provided Planning Commission. 3. C! the number of standard, compact, disabled accessible and required by code. See attached table provided by Have they (Red Roof Inn) looked at using uni-stall, would there be any gain in number? See attached PROPOSED PARKING SUMMARY — SCHEME 2- We researched several parking layouts with uni-stall and found the most efficient with 127 uni-stall parking spaces would yield 201 total parking spaces. Exactly the same as our variance request. Are there any opportunities to replace landscaping with hard scape/parking areas? See attached PROPOSED PARKING SUMMARY — SCHEME 1— By removing three !andSCwpf,' �.t'lj�S ^�eas::�i^� 7.�i Sy. {i. c'liiu by i.CfiVcilflC�. aii i��liiS2ti �ii'JcVda'j! aGCv�� to parking stalls, we can achieve a total yield of 204 parking spaces. The landscaping reduction of 73 sq. ft. equals a reduction of .05%. Existin han e 5 Total site 134,878 134,878 Total landscape area 35,777 35,704 Total landscape area percentage 26.52% 26.47% What is the average percentage of occupancy of rooms in the hotel? 76% , � �,,, �, �� `�� o� ,.-. �C9 � � � � .�� r� a � > �, � L� � Z m� �� ;� � �' ar— c`� 184 Harbor Way, South San Francisco, California 94083-3045 P. O. Box 3045 (650) 588-3893 Fax (650) 873-4605 Ms. Margaret Warne Monroe, City Planner March 12, 1999 Page two 6. What happens if hotel guests park in the parking spaces designated for public access parking? The agreement with BCDC is the hotel guests have priority on the parking spaces. 7. Converting conference room space to hotel rooms, how many cars did the conference room space generate as opposed to the number of cars generated by the use of the area as hotel rooms? Rpd Roof Inr.'purchased the prooerty in 1994 from Days Inn. Red Roof Inn has r,ot used the conference rooms since purchasing the property. The best information we have is from an administrative employee that worked for Days Inn and still works at the property. She feels the utilization of the conference rooms was on average three days a week with approximately one hundred cars. If we use these numbers: 3 days x 100 cars = 300 300 cars = 7 days = 42 cars per day Thank you for the opportunity to provide responses to these questions. Please let me know if there is any additional information that we can provide. Sincerely yours, MARCHETTI CONSTRUCTION INC. �i� � c�.�L__--. ichaeC . Ro Vice-President MFR:tII Enclosures cc: Donald G. Burr �� !� �� MAR 15 1999 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT, N � � � m 0 m � � � � � � C 0 N � L � � � � .Y L �0 E �O N m N O � Qi � L � � O�i G-, �'�l �t_- "�Tzd'�Po S�'� "P�r1 W ti,C t�c MCfi7 l� l�� t,�t1�1i��.�j W'�.tt�. S}�pWT�. BURLINGAME RED R��F 1NN CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE 'C' - MEETING ROOM REMODEL �__ � -- - /l f�l�_ �/' . __�—`__„_ / ' - r_ l ' / ' 1 �� i , r?"� / � 1. �. \`'`.``s` \s •� ss . . �' . ..�\^ I �G ��..._ �--. ; � �`_ _" _ __ " u PROP03ED SITE PLAN � � . .� _-� , . z� n rn z W � � . z � �-. rn . �� z � � -+ � ca ..._... m ;� n-r-,-� . � NNEf E ALBFM80N ARC117ECi ! U I � I R �".na° uacc.o+u ww unw neuu.ao w ieu r�ar 1 �—�_ � PROPOSED PARKING SUMMAAY :.w ea� �wurv� � w� �w�.c� �e ...,.�.ao _�W :.�.�;. .�.,,.�..��. —�- �� a �� nNN _ w��wosNwa�o.M �e. i� ..k,�, .�,...� � r+�rea _ , ��. �� w�� `� OtZt� tK� �a^PoS�..� `�'t�t� � - tN �`�t-t� tMua �-� tr� -p�,�zy-t�.�-5 - .. � m � 0 � � � � � 0 N c 0 � � L a, � � � L �0 � �o r m � 0 � � � ., �. � � � � � -� � z� zW Z C �� z rn� �� .� m � n � F-� e� � ca � PF��P�J�ED P�RKING SIJMMARY MOt�L P�RKIN� RE�UIREC � ST.�LL P�R EYISTING- CzUE�r RCCM I ST.�,LL FOR PROPDS�C C�U��T ROOMS TOT�L F�R!�ING PRG`✓ICEG RECzUl��:1i2 ST,�LLS coMP,acrt Srt��LS N.�NDIC,�P S7,�LL5 '�AN �CC�551BL� N,�NC�CAfi' Sl",�L�� rtCTAL ��ST�,u►�.Nt P,�RK(NCx RE�U!RE� s0 PARKItiC� PRCVIC�D �I f'�ECaUL.a?� 5�:�'.�.�LS C7 COMP,�,CT 5i�.aLLS � NNNDIC,�P 57,1;LLS � �o � .�� rn � -OT.�,L = �RK'NCz RECxt�-2EC G�-�ITE �o�� Par�K�N� P�ovf DED CN -�I i E :�c 13 213 a� 8� ., 5 I 182 L2 1Q J I �z �� M D'L7 t� t�� L�%l U`� l!i(,-1 ,� GC� w�'�1�.1 �-�CriU� C�F ,� Q 'p��-�G,c c t. �4�.. �`C��t-1-`> �Tl'b t t N t•`�`T�l_L� .� t L. . C�1"'��`i' `�i��L'� "C�'��."p • McrD t�`f' 1��-�tTtT'�.TtS wt��tt�.. 51�-�w� , ' � m � 0 m'^ W � � � O N c 0 N +� L GJ � � � � L N L �v W m � O m m p"� � � � BURLINGAME RED R�OF INN CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE "C" - MEETING ROOM REMODEL r__ -- -- ----�_� I� �� i�� ~ _� �� _�� ' _ � / � r , _ - .__' - _—. _ ' �_�� `, '�NLI 8pU[Ey,lqp �_`�--,-�__ - - �� _-- ii / � � - �ii / � `�� -'----f?�---- — C7 "D � r "� Dp z „ zW zc L� � � Z m� � � m µri , r •,ad�/ / , ��\� 1 � . �;:,. ,.� � ;,::-� . . Y .�,� i �� I ,'� �------ � > i � ---------�W:...—�.,. --�� s-------��\ � �►laDr�lk� "Ps-�iT�t� �; ;� i� "Rabt�T' • t�� w�•;, �� PROPOSED SlTE PLAN PROPOSEb PARKINO SUMMARY . � hK3A1}I :.�.� ��.��. .�. �...�.P.�..�.. �� .� M..errunvw ��ls�Et, `Ya41� Ta �� n .� ,,,;�.ae �� ,��.�.�.�.�. � i ._J_ I AWaf E AlB9fT�ON ARC �� N�LMLY)owi uM RAMt T)wYp MIO M1� �� --. A0.1 �, �D� l'F tET� , u S�'t�l G �+r Go v�n�g ��t��T"l O� b� � 'P��4� ��. S-r�u.S �t�� i • S��t..-'S. �c�►— Gov�'�'�t��" S-,�'�..5 -v'�.�.�T�.� . � � � 0 � � � � 0 � c 0 � � L a, .n � � L i0 � �o � m N 0 m m , ., � �. � � �-�� . C7 �� r D Z � z w Z� �� vz m� �� m � n � � � � c� ca PF��P+��ED PARKING SlJIV111��RY MOTEL P�RKING RE�GIRtG I �T�LL PER EX�Si IN� Gl,EST �CGM I ST,a�� GR PROPCSc� GUEST RCO�iS rorta� P��iGIN� P�'O��✓IDEC R`C�UL:�R ST.=�L�.S ; 9' UJIDE) uNi s-r,a��s :��-�� 7c Q� u�ic�� N�aN�cca.P s: ��s V,aN AG ;�SSIBLE N�!NGiGAP Sl'ALL.S TOT,�� R�ST.�i�Ri�NT � PA�KI�G eE�UlR�D � PARKING PRO'�,�IG�G � R��u��;� st,��.s � g� wi�� UNI 5T;'�LL� !8'-0" t� 9' II,ID�1 � NANDIC;�P S`ALL.S y�� tora� "�+e TCt;�L F.-�KKII�Cs R��UI��D 01�-�I�iE TGTAL P.�:RKI\�x �20vIGEG� ^N-�ITk i �'('G 13 213 6l �� 5 1 1�9 l2 � LI I 2% 235 � �'. ' /�rr c�rr o. . �R��:,,,� CITY OF BURLINGAME �� .;:_. � APPLICATION TO TI� PLANNING COMMISSION Type of Application: Special Permit X Variance Other Project Address: 777 AIRPORT BOULEVARD Assessor's Parcel Number(s): � APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: MARCHETTI CONSTRUCTION INC. Name: RED ROOF INNS, INC. Address: 184 HARBOR WAY City/State/Zip: SO.S. F. , CA 94080 Phone (w): 650 634 8000 Address:4355 DAVIDSON ROAD City/State/Zip: HILLIARD, OH 43026 Phone (w): 614 876 3476 c��: - f�; 650 873 4605 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: MARK E. ALBERTSON Address: 1676 CALLE RANCHERO City/State/Zip: PETALUMA, CA 94954 , - `Phone (w): 707 763 1580 m)� f�: 614 777 1586 Please indicate with an asterisk * the contact person for this application. �) � � � f�; 707 763 0886 PROJECT DESCRIPTION• RECONVERSION OF CONFERENCE FACIL-ITIES T0 �•= ORIGINAL GUEST ROOM CONFIGURATION AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given �herein is �true aiid coirect to � ebest " y knowledge and bel�ef. - � � �" - � - . ., : ..� ..�._.: _ ... :_. .. . �-- . . .. _ .., : , _. _ . . _ . - _ ��_ _��r�� nlicant' ' nature Date �. , .. _ . . I�aiow about the pioposed =application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Cominission. e��17��/'�i S �C �/. I'• 2C� 'Qoo � /N.� �,v� 7�r/ �4 /S4 � Property Owner's Signature Date . ------------------------------------FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ------------------------------------- Date Filed• Fee: _ _ _ _ __ _ Planning Commission: Study Date: Action Date: , 4�� CITY Os . , . � � � � BLRL•INGAME �OO U II �� U�11�JlrVIIVULS . . �," , - ,,<. �Q° G�� f(�(�� f�PL�U��f ��(�l� . 0... The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's ordinance (Code Section 25.54.020 a-d). Your answers to the foilowing questions wili assist the Planning Commission in making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatly in ink. Refer to the back of this form for assistance with these questions. a. Describe the exceptiona/ or extraordinary circumstances or conditions app/icab/e to your property which do not app/y to other properties in this area. b. Exp/ain why the variance request is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantia/ property right and what unreasonab/e property /oss or unnecessary hardship might resu/t from the denia/ of the application. THE PREVIOUS OWNERS CONVERTED TNE ROOMS TO CONFERENCE FACILITIES. THEY ARE UNDER UTILIZED, IN FACT, NO LONGER USED, THEREFORE �E HISH TO RE-ESTABLISH THE HOTEL ROOM USEAGE. c. Exp/ain why the proposed use at the proposed /ocation wi// not be detrimenta/ or lnjurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or to public hea/th, safety, genera/ we/fare, or convenience. THIS APPLICATION WOULD RE—ESTABLISH THE USE LEVEL FOR HOTEL ROOMS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IN SEPTEMBER OF 1980. d. How wi// the proposed project be compatib/e with the aesthetics, mass, bu/k and character _ _ _ of the existing and potentia/ uses on adjoining properties in the genera/ vicinityT NO CHANGE FROM EXISTING. �2�ss ��.f�, 1�/23/98,. MON 16:01 FAX 415 342 2635 RED ROOF INN #228 � . . , ' �W� C�M�'�RC'•IAL APPLICATIONS � � e`~--��'� PZ�?�NNIl�iG CQMMISSTON' 11,PPLICATION SUPPL��, FORM 1. Proposed use of the site. �.'i r� 2. Days and hours of operation. +��, e �4 �>Yi �, 3• Number of truaks/service vehicles to be parkeci at site (by type). �..1�� 4- Current and projected maximum number of Hours of Operation Weekdays Full-time Part-time Existing �M- After PM 5:00 PM �9 3 Weekends j 2 �L- Full-time � r� Part-time s• Cun�nt and proj Existing Houra of AM_ Operation PM Weekdays j Q� ; w��as , qp :(n 2 Years (including owner) at this location: AM- After PM 5:00 PM in 5 Years _ . 001_ �M- After PM 5:00 PM � � e � $ �� maximum number of visitors/customers who may come to the site: After 5:00 PM 1 C} cw �i� r�r• In 2 Years AM After PM 5:00 PM In 5 Years �- After PM 5:00 PM 6• What is the maximum number of�(e expacted on site at any one time ('include owner, employees and visitors/customers): �� • 7• Where dotwill the ownes & employee, park'1 � 8. Where do/will customers/visitors park? t � t- 9. Present or most recent use of site. ��. �`�. 10. List of other tenants on ro "� . list if necessary), P�m'' ��'� Qumber of employees, hours of operation (att�ch � �''" I .r��' � � � 1� 21-1999 8: OdAM FROM P. 3 M.�RK E. ALBE�tTS01�� Arcl�itect � Member NC�IltB . 1G76 Callo Ranchoro . Potatuma . CA , p4954 707 . 763 ISb`A prx 707 . 963 URE6 January 19, 1999 Mr. Michael F. Roach �/ice Preudenl � HOTEl. CONSTRUCTIO�t SERVICES 184 Hazbor Way So. San Prancisca, California 94083 Dear Mz�, Roach: �i�� 1� �� JAN 2 11999 CITY OF BURLING�ME PLANNING DEpT: In response to the City of Burlingame Planning Department comments as summarized in Maureen Brook's letter to yau, dated December 30, 1498, our office has revi�.wved the project and have comgiled the following responses to theu• questions and concerns. All questions raised shall be further addressed in the Project's Construction Documents which wip be submitted to the City of Burlingame �uildir� De�artment upon approval of this Variance Appiication. 5anitary Sewer System Impact (Public Worl�s bepartment): The existing sanitary se�wer syscean can handle the incr�ased capacity. There are currently 4" vertical risers throughout the building which will handle the fifth �laor load. Upon reaching the first floor sub-slab horizozrtal tie-iq there is cucremly a 5° coIl�ccor line. �'his 5" line ties into an existing 6" poiru of connection (5 feet fzom building edge). There may be a need to increase the 5" line to 6" along it's horizonta! run as it picks up the 4" vertical Iines thus leuding e� the existing 6" point of cormection. Howevex, this exact incrqse un line si�e and it's location, if required at all, shaIl not be determined until completion�ofthe Construction Documems. Such infortnation, calcuiations, and corresp8nding scope of woric sizall be shown on the Construction Documents submitted to the City of Bwlingame Building Deparcmern for plan check and permit assuar�ce. �iandicap A,ctessibiiity Reg�irements (Building Departmemt): Our office was the Archiiect�ral firm on the interior renovatio� and remodel of the existing guest rooms (phase one) as they are in place now. At that time, and with the Dcr►owledge that the Fi#th Floor Meetir� Rnoms may be conveited to guest rooms in the future, our office calculatcd handicap reguirements that were in �place at thax time based upon conversion of the meeting rooms and incorporated that quantity coi�n! irrto the first phase remodei. Therefore, please note the foliowing requirements: 1-21-1 �999 8:0dAM FROM P. d ., _ Page Two X.etter to Mr. Michael Roach J��ery ) 9. 1999 Proposed Total Guest Ro�m Count: Required Fully Accessible Rooms (CBC Table 11B-3) Required Accessble Room.c with Roll-In Shower (CBC Table 11 B- �} Required Ro�ms Equipped for Hearin� Impaired (CBC Table 11 B-4) Cxistin� Fully Acc�ssible Kooms Existing Accessible �Rooms with Roll-In Shower Existin� Rooms Equipped for Hearir� Impatred 213 7 3 7 6 3 9 L'pon fieJd confirmation of the above, one fully accessible unit may need to be incorporated into the scope of work (which may be a result of cliang� co the code requirements or an oversight at the time). If this is th� ca,ae, such s3uest room will likely be located on rhe &rst fluor and such remodcl work shall be shown on the Canstruction Documents submitted to the City of Burlingame Buildin,� Department for pian check and pem�it issuance. . Comp�tct Purldng St�ll Count (Planni�g Depa�rtment): The current parking lot is stripped for 3A Compact 1'aarrking stalls. There has not bccn any restriping work done to the par}dng lot. The 85 Compact Parking stalls si�awn on the drawinss as submitted ace "p�•oposeci" and thus would be resvipped as part of this project's approval. I hope that the above meets with your ap�roval. Upon your review of the aaove responses, please contaot me at (70'7) 763-1580 to further review, discuss, and proceed with the project. . Sinc y, Mark E. Aibertson Architect �C�L_� �( �� J A N 2 11999 CI"TY OF BURLINGAME ' PLANNING DEPT. . e ROUTING FORM DATE: December 17, 1998 TO: CITY ENGINEER �CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL _FIRE MARSHAL _SR. LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR _CITY ATTORNEY FROM: CITY PLANNER/PLANNER SUB,TECT: Request for parking variance to convert conference facilities to 13 hotel rooms at 777 Airport Boulevard, zoned C-4, APN: 026-344- 130. SCHEDULED PLANNING COMNIISSION ACTION MEETING: February 8, 1999 STAFF REVIEW BY: Monday, December 28, 1998 Please note: No staff ineeting is scheduled for Monday, December 28. Please return your comments by that date. THANKS, Maureen/7anice/Ruben ! Z G Date of Comments .� G� i" � d�-�,.,,5 (.�.Y i'L"�l2 -'vr �_ C�J i'�ir c�C G� 6 Sl �D/� � � �,�- r° �l- i ti S��`e". r � G.� 2+� �� v U j, v G a� 0�'. �� a��c.�0 � �� j� z rrwy r'"`� �� .'•��' CITY OF BURLINGAME . BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT �501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 TEL: (650) 696-7250 _ 777 AIRPDRT POULEVARD APN:0�:6-344-13k7 � �! Applic�tion for parking v�ri�nces fot^ number pUBLIC HEARING of spaces and n�.�mber of compact sp�ces and NOTICE condition�l use permit to exceed the density requirements of the Ht�rlingame Payfront Specific Area F�lan to convert existing conference facilities to•13 hotel rooms at 777 � Air�,ort Poulevard, aoned C-4.� The City of Ptirlingame Planning Cammission anno�.mces the following public hearing on � ' Monday, March 22, 1999 at 7:00 P.M.• in the i 1 y a o�mci ambers locatEd at 501 : F'rimrose Road, Purlingame, California. Mailedr�lar�tierlGo lt�e�r side) , 3+2�' �1.'�i „jZ. .Sk. rv'�'F �i'�:�,hw.�W A copy of the a� to the meeting Burlingame, Ca CITY OF B URLINGAME �.::�;�;-�:: ::sy may be reviewed prior " '�'SOl Primrose Road, � �� s� �� r - � � �Q � ,e� C a e� ,�, 4 � '; br�� a�.� � If you challen e`�tie�ubject ap�iucat�on(s) m couit� ;°°you may�be limited to � raising only�those^ ssues�y�u or somec�ne else raised � the;�t�bhc hearmg, � , �_�7 � ; described i��the�notic� ar �,n�wntten correspondence del�vered to the city ' at or prior to t�1�Npubl�c��iea�g�. �: ��; ��;�" �� `��' � � � � ; � c �, t 1 t ta t� � z.A, � � � � � � � � r�� r------^��--�-��,�-��, <; , , � �� .� � Property ow�ers vv�ho recerve�2iis�n�t��e are�responsibl �%r;�irifortning,their � res tenants abo�Zt� thts noU �� For a�idi�ional uiformatio ple�se call .(650) ; ' 696-7250. �'hank z o�[ ��' �'�'� � � � �Q „ �"� �{ �� ' S ,� i. � p J. V * . ��k'r!i � '4y �y rk. g k 3 � . ' . ' � � .. ' g� � ,< 'g, �', y�t� �� $ .'�= 8� �� p ��(� j {Ti!�T) r2 '�`� p� 7 � � ' . . . . . . , �S tw �,��,�{_ ✓r� ....� �` w.F �3 Y, �:.I�' E��°v � �e . � . ' , � � Margazet Mo oe �� > �'` _ � � , � � � � � � � ti� � � �_ � City Planner `,`� °�� `ti., � � � �E i� ��., �;�� r� � . i • �� ,..�.� .��.,. �� ` � � � . ; _ PUB��C��i��n�G�ay.o�TicE � . ��:��..��.�.�,�..��.�� , . . ; ` �(Please refer to other side) . . � : � , � .� � .�� . _ '�� :�,�.�;,► � � �� . � . � �� . `�� 'Fi,� �� - � � � - <<� �: �, f Dot� (o! eTY� � " �. .. � �e ,. ;: � '''► .4�,. �� ._ '� � ; �O� f " `�y t � r �` ' � {� � N � ��,�. � �1 �. � � , � �� o . , � � , ,� .0 < , �,, �ij�� 7� � � �� "�. �,�y� , ,.� 1�°�� .. - � �' ,� - . �; ♦ :� :. �;: � y �£,. � � � ' �r. � �M. A "�. .�`� � i _. �� •� O "4 � � � � �J � �� ,,,��, Jv �►,. � �O �. e � � x!`. � y�.. w . , f�. - �6s � � � ,�� ;� � �.- 41+1 �L �'1' � I� } � : �4 � � � p �. � ?: s� r� ti� P�� Red �a� (nn ,• � ;� � � '� � � � "� ..�, � � �:� � �� - �� . . --` . . ;,�:,;�a �� ,�:�.�, .:.�, .� _ ;.�,,�.,,:.,<::_ � � "�. y .. � s • � RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND PARKING VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: � •. � . �-- � ��. -� � .�� . �-- .�- � �. ,��• ,�.� : .�� _�� •�,_ . ' �: �n • .�� '� �� ' 'i ' �.�� . : • �� - �� : ��.�� :.� - � •�'� � ,-� ��• �� . � �� L�<� . � �. 1 + • '► 1 . • 1 WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of BurIingame on M�rch 22� 1999 , at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RFSOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Inidal Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a signiiicant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, existing facilities, class 1(a), interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances is hereby approved. � 2. Said parking variance and conditional use permit are approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such parking variance and conditional use permit are as set forth in the minutes and recording �of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, Dave Luzuria�a , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of March , 1222_, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SECRETARY �;� � . _ ,, � . EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval categorical exemption, parking variance and condidonal use permit 777 Airport Boulevard effective Apri15, 1999 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped December 16, 1998, Sheets A0.1, A1.1, A3.1 and A3.2, with 201 parking spaces provided, 94 of which aze compact; 2. that the hotel shall continue to provide a 24-hour airport shuttle service, which incIudes connections to Caltrain to accommodate employees during shift changes; 3. that guests, visitors or employees may not be chazged for the use of on-site parking without amendment to this use permit, this would include valet parking arrangements; 4, that long term airport pazking for a fee or no fee shall not occur at this site (including "sleep, park & fly" promotions) without amendment to this permit; 5. that no room in the hotel shall be leased to a single individual, company or corporate enrity for more than 29 days and no rooms and/or any part of the building shall be leased for permanent residential purposes except that the hotel manager may live on the site; 6. that small delivery trucks or vans with periodic deliveries may be on site during operating hours, and no trucks shall be stored or parked on site continuously throughout the day or overnight; and 7. that any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building and Fire Codes, 1995 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame. �a