The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About777 Airport Blvd - CEQA Documents� w e C��.e C�,z.�� .a.� �axx�Z�.��xxrr.e . SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD . BURLINGAME� CALIFORNIA 94010 Augusi 1, 1980 - State Clearinghouse Z400 - lOth Street Sacramento, CA. 95814 TEL:(415) 342-8931 • Gentlemen: NOTICE OF PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION � � DAYS INN OF AMERICA, 777 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, BURLINGAME Enclosed please.�find ten (10) copies of the proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study for the above�project, which is a 214 room -Five story motel in the w`aterf•ront Commercial District adjacent. to Burlingame's shoreline. Copies of this notice, proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study are also being sent ta the following individuals or.a�encies: �. 1. C. B. Day Realty of California Suite 150, 601 Universiiy Avenue Sacramento, CA. 95825 Attention: Max F. James . Vice President 2. David H. Keyston, Trustee Anza Shareholders' Liquida�ing Trust 770 Airport Boulevard � Burlingame, CA. 94010 3. Four Seas Center, Ltd. 8Q0 Airport Boulevard Burlingame, CA. 94010 Attention: Stanley_Lo �. William J. Purdy, Jr. 770 Airport Boulevard Burlingame, CA. 94010 5. ,State Lands Commission State Lands Division _ State of California 1807 - 13th Street Sacramento, CA. 95814 Attention: Herbert Maricle 6. Bay Conservation and Development Commission 30 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA. 94102 0 Projeci applicant Owner of project site; owner of property adjacent to project'site Owner of property a�ijacent to project site . , O�vner Qf property adjacent to project site Owner of property in the vicinity of the project site Responsible agency, Shoreiine Permit requirement � Q� o State Clearinghouse -2- August 1, 1980 � The proposed Negative Declaration for the Days Inn of America project has been prepared because this agency has concluded that the design changes and mitigation measures which have been taken by the project applicant during the 3 months since its first review by the Ciiy of Burlingame have resulted in a project wnich will not have a significant effect on the environment. The attached Initial Study documents the present project; this Study is based on specific plans and data filed by the project sponsor ("Project Assessment for the Proposed Days Inn Motel", Earth Metrics Incorporated, 6/3/80 revised ;8/1/80). A copy of this project assessment is enclosed for information. We would appreciate any comments you may have relative to this project or the proposed Negative Declaration on or before September 5, 1980. If no comments are required, an acknowledgement of receipt and review will be appreciated. It is proposed that the Negati.ve Declaration be posted on the above date and that a public hearing on this project be scheduled before the Burlingame Planning Cor�nission September 22, 1980. � JRY/s Enclosures Sincerely, ..��,�, �� John R. Y City Planner B � } � � � EXHIBST A- NOTICE OF DET�RMINATION � a77 AIRPORT BOULEVARD ' � �,�,�-Y Tentative Pracedure �,. Pro�ect Address or Location �+. ^.'��. .(�»O� . .c � a..:. 5/1/74, Subject :to Revision ,, BIJ%LtitiGRME , � ` . . ,� _�� L TO : COUNTY CLERK , • : . - � a�� ,. County of San Mateo ' . � • � � �'°�`��- ' Redwood City, CA. 94063 � File No. ND-254P �AATLD JVM[ � . . .. � cc:. Secretary for_Resaurces, Sacramento, CA. .� •, Project Title: DAYS INN`OF AMERICA � -� AppZicant' s Name c C. B. Day Real ty of Ca�i i forni a. Address: 60I University Avenue? Suite 150 City: Sacramento, CA. ' Zip: 95825 Contact Person z Max F. James Area Code 916 Phone : 920-4427 Ext .-- PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOCATION: The site consists-of approximately 126,000 SF of barren, low-lying land fill in the western end:of Anza Airport Park.�The.project is a five story motel, 46 feet h,igh, with 214'guest rooms. The motel`office will�be in:a'separaie one ��story building,`containing a.gift>shop and smart7-:coffee�shop with 43 seats; an attached, cano py wt s e er severa gaso.�ne pumps;,pro�r� e as a.conven�ence o mo e. gues s. e . m l ff • � o. 4%._yri 11 �- an scape . � . . _ � The City of' Buriingame, by : JONN R: XOST .� �- on JULY 30 1980 , completed a review of the proposed pra�ect and determined that: � 1. The project is` exempt, fram . O OrIGaING PROJECT �EQA requirements as:; (}"FEASIBILITY AND PLANNING STUDY�. ' ( ) CATEGQRTCAL:.EXEMPTION' . .. ( ): EMERGENCY PR43ECT . �-�: MINISTERIAL PROJEC�. � 2.. Zt ��iXIX�XX�X��(��.�X( wiZT not)' haue a significant effeet on : . the environment. � ' 3 . It �.s (appraved) .i��fX1��X#rX��(- . Reasons for Conclusion:. R detailed pr�o� `ect study was� fi1'ed 6,y the a pl icant _whicft_______ ..' ena e a ega iv� ec aration �o^Te pos eiTc �ar Fiis ro��c� cop�es o�"' �ese ocumen s werP circulated to the State Clearin house for comment. A��_�_pecial Permit was s____ubse�cuentl a raved _-`6y tTje i y s ann�n�mm�gs�on . ep e:,� er �'£ I�ff�1�i five— �on—►c ��ions. Un a a, a new hear�nq was held and �he pro�ect was approve� �.y the C�ty Council November 3, 1��1. � An Environmental Impact Report ��(has: not), b�en prepar.ed pursuant to the provisi:ons of the Califarnia Environmental: Quality Act of 1970, as , amer�ded. . , : .� . _ - NOVEMBER 26 I98Q �� . arj � , _ � � _ Date Signed Signatur o Processing Official Date Posted: DECEMBER I, 1980 ' � CIi'Y PLANNER • � Title ATTEST: � • G� � . . . � : . . E ELYN H. HII.L, Ci ty Gl erk . . City of �iurizngame � ... __ _ w �, c�TY o , �s� y.. � �� BUfdLINGr1ME TO: _�,.,�, '� � L9 os . 9y'� 9i � . �AATEDJUn[6 ' PROPOSED EXHIBIT 6 - NEGATIVE DECLARATION Tentative Procedure ' � 5/10/73, Subject to.Revision - Projeci Title: STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 1400 - lOth Street Sacramento, CA. 95814 DAYS INN OF AMERICA File No. ND-254P Type of Permit: Special Permit to construct a 214 room motel which exceeds a Oesign Guideline (recently established by Council Resolution No. 9-80) requirin a - 138' setback from Anza Pacific Boulevard. � • R i , .. � Legal Description: Portion of Lois 5 and 6, Block 5, Anza Airport Park Unit No. 7 (portion of RPN 026-344-010/02�). � Zone: C-4 . "Waterfront Commercial" Property avner: Name: Anza Shareholders' Liquidating � Trust Address: 770 Airport Boulevard � Burlingame, CA. 94010 Contact Person:_ David H. Ke.vston, Jr.. Area Code: 415 Phone: 342-5711 Applicant: ` Name: C. B. Day Realty of California Address: 601 University Avenue � Suite 150, Sacramento, CA. 95825 Contact Person: Max F. James, Vice President Are Code: 916 Phone: 920-4427 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: " . The site consists of approximately 126,000 SF of barren; low-lying land fill in the western end of Anza Airport Park, adjacent to both Airport Boulevard and a road reserve for a possible future connection to Bayshore Freeway. The project. is a five story motel, 46 feet high, with 21.4 guest rooms. The motel office will be in a separate one story building, containing a gift shop and small coffee shop 4rith 43 seats; an attached canopy will shelter several gasoline pumps, provided as a convenience to motel guests. . . The motel, offices and coffee shop will cover 16q of the site. Approximately 75,000 SF (60% of the site) will be paved to provide 214 parking spaces, 39 of which.will be for compact cars. The remaining 30,000 SF (24% of�the site) will be planted with trees, lawn and shrubs, and developed with a swimming pool. The southern boundary of the property, adjacent to the Anza area's "inner lagoon", . wil7 also be landscaped, and will include a pedestrian walk and bicycle path. Separate permits for these improvements will b e required. The City of Burlingame by John R. Yost on July 30, 1980 , completed a review of the proposed project and determined that: (X) � ) It will not haue a significant effect on the environment. No Environmental Impact Report is required. 777 AIRPORT BOULEVARD Project Address or Location �_--- 0 / �� , ,��: . :; .�/�, :: : F2 �NC�SC� SAN s�t� AAYS �� PL 1 LAG�ON � � � 'QQ 1 � �.� / �Ci�,PNi 1�'Y:'.c �/ � / �J' '� � ��'t' y�` - .r a n,Q �' �4{�E' <ry � �, �s-° ��' o� p 3 � �i 4 � � �HiT� p �� PO�U�(/S ,�40 ��y, P � � a� u Cv Qo � �' QJ� �? �,� C''4'P4,q,v � �` A�F ,9.'� � �j,l� � G �` �,HC�A . � � O �60 !� GN 0� U/$T � � 4 C � A A , �o , �o 00 lE2 "�F°O �9 � qvF �F � Cqe4 '�j�, � \ ��o � ' `�`qC ��'Uo /� AVE � � �r ��p`�/�/� \9YE '� O�� E �' � V \ \/ `�\ 4 ��O �� \t � � F o��o o � � �O o C� Q�\ Q�< �O�Sq� C vO �Q W �,'l. ,% �� q � �� ` � � `f � � ` � � '"� �a'l �. , �� ' �VF J�� q.. O r. , o �� ,., �� - � . � ��`..�� , ti,,o ��s� �o� f • ,. '"�.� i �V �� :�, i `�, ✓ I \�� , y 1L � J: E �1' ' � ��i � ��'�' ]H[ :� L�L. �� i�.� tr�\ r l�:f e BAYSI�!?E �/.�� P��r '��PB�I � > � �9 �lEf �� g''�' v y�y AV�c/ �i\ �q �,�Y � ; ' , 1 ;� ' � ' , \�// e ��- RO/JD �� 20LUN5 �'� �> � �, 0 � /� P� �'� i/� o� \�•�/ /`� v�i J'J.q �=f�, (,, / � � � �f✓ ^ ^ FY � `O�/ ��<��< \ _`P 7 �! _ '<�� 'G�;.U/�K"` �� \�. /c �\ � � « � �'� �1t� � ��J�' %D� North � :;� , /� � /� _ 1 . ✓„ � ' �� . \�\ � //)�� \ '" � .,�� LOC��10�"9 ' ' ' - .. . . "' _. . ' .. ,_ _� -_ ' . ., . • , . . . .. z . ._ .. ._._. . _. .. . . � , . ' San Franctsco Bay . . � � � • . . . � � '. , . - - - --- -�—�_. -=-__--.,._��--- -- _ -- - - - -- _.��.�--•---._._----.-�._...._. - �.j��li;i�� I'• j 1 i: ,� • . • �I' ;�Il�iij ;.,}I�!i; ;, . : . - . ��;,:{�#�1�� ,::i�►i:: . � . . . Exfsttng Otlice! r. . ' . W rehouse Use . . . . � � . . � � . r`��_ . � I � . Proposec0 OfSice Uss � , Existing Ottic�! I , Restaurant Use - � . � � �. . - � ,,� ! � 1�.) I ' � . �� ,, ��!. tagoon . . Q�a i � � . ye� � . 'I�!'If �I I' . .� �: \`;. I � �I I IIII I I , . � �a �.;::`�'��s;. -. _ . r; •�:��.�',':,ra''• �. •.>•.;• ;� ' '\� ��;�. � �.�1 Y • .. . . . . �, \�\�:i • �� Existfng Q4f9ce/ � . - `\�,'.•1 , . . � r' War #iouse t}s . ��; � • _ . '�� ' � �� .. , . �� ' -. . t . �/ � � . . p � . , - �� ' , �� ' ' , ` �\, � ..- •'. �� ' �� Op� , ' Airport Boulevard � . . � . • �� 0� • . _ �� " �� , � �� Multipte Au2omobt Parking & Stora e Factiittes . � � �� - . . : . � � � . . � . , . � . ~�.l'__.��_-�. . . , � � ' , � . " " ....'�� . . � ' , ' � - ....... ;.._....=. .. _.::- � -- - ''Lagoon�`.�.~---,---�._" ��.=�� ' ---".=Y=�-_ . . """" _.-•..,,.��`_ '.__:__:... : : . �i�e Lo�a�i�� eartt� m�trics �� a�{. ;`�� I PROJECT SITE PLAI�I � 1 � -2- REASONS FOR CONCLUSION: ' An Initial Study was prepared for this project, and it determined that the project, as modified, will not cause any of the following effects: 1. Conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community where it is located; 2. Have a substantial, demonstrable negative aesthetic effect; 3. Substantially affect a rare or endangered species of animal or plant or the habitat of the species; 4. Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; 5. Breach published national, state, or local standards relating to solid waste or litter control; 6. Substantially degrade water quality; 7. Contaminate a public water supply; 8. Substantially degrade on deplete.ground water resources; - 9. Interfere substantially with ground water recharge; 10. Disrupt or alter an archaeological site over 200 years old, an historic site or a paleontological site except as part of a scieniific study of . the site; . 11. Induce substantial growth or concentration of population; 12. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system; 13. Displace a l.arge number of people; 14. Encourage activities which result in the use of large amounts of fuel or energy; 15. Use.fuel or energy in a wasteful manner; � 16. Increase substantially the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas; 17. Cause substantial flooding; erosion,or siltation; 18. Expose people or structures to major geologic hazards; 19. Extend a sewer trunk line with capacity to serve new development; 20. Substantially diminish habitat for fish, wildlife or plants; 21. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community; 22. Create a public heaTth hazard or a potential public.health hazard; 23. Conflict with established recreational, educational, religious or scientific � uses of the area; � 24. Violate any ambient air quality standard, contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, or expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. , � � , • July 30, 1980 � � . b�i Signature of rocessing Official City Planner (Title) , Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the determination shall be final. � Date Posted: Proposed date: September 5, 1980 DECLARATION OF POSTING I declare under penalty of perjury that I am City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that I posted a true copy of the above Negative Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to the Council Chambers. .Executed at Burlingame, California on ' , 1980 Appealed: ( )Yes ( )No EVELYN H. HILL , ' CITY CLERK • EXHIBIT C - INITIAL STUDY Tentative Procedure 5/10/73, Subject to Revision (� CITY ��ia'�'��f ti �M . '„�3' �e, ". B��L�� aAh9� T0: STATE CLEARINGHOUSE �'�` 1400 - lOth Street '�9�"'�� '�9� Sacramento, CA. 95814 $RwTro.�uHGb� ' � 777 AIRPORT BOULEVARD Project Address or Location File No. ND-254P Project Title: DAYS INN OF AMERICA Type of Permit: Special Permit to construct a 214 room motel which exceeds a � Design Guideline (recently established by Council Resolution No. 9-80) requiring a �138' setback from Anza Pacific Boulevard. � , Legal Description: Portion of�Lots 5 and 6, B1ock 5, Anza Airport Park Unit No. 7 �portion of AP(� 026-344-010/020). � . . i Property Owner: Name: Anza Shareholders' Liqiaidating ' Trust Address: 770 Airport Boulevard Burlingame, CA. 94010 Contact Person: David H. Keyston, Jr. Area Code: 415 Phone: 342-5711 � PROJECT DESCRIPTTON: Zone: C-4 °l�Jaterfront Commercial" Appl icant: . . . Name: C. B. Day Realty of California Address: 601 University Avenue Suite.150, Sacramen;:o, CA. 95825 Contact Person: Max F. James, Vice President Area Code: 916 Phone: 920-4427 The site consists of approximately 126,000 SF of barren, low-lying land fill in the western end of Anza Airport Park, adjacent to both Airport Boulevard and a road reserve for a possible future connection to Bayshore Freeway. The project is a five story motel, 46 feet high, with 214 guest rooms. The motel office will be in a separate one story building, containing a gift shop and small coffee shop with 43 seats; an attached canopy will shelter several gasoline pumps,. provided as a convenience,to motel gues:�s. � The motel, off.ices and coffee shop will cover 16% of the site. Approximately 75,000 SF (60� of the site) tvill be paved to provide 214 parking spaces, 39 of which will be for compact cars. The remaining 30,000 SF (24% of the site) will. be planted with trees, lawn and shrubs, and developed with a swimming pool. The southern boundary of the property, adjacent to the Anza area's "inner lagoon", will also be landscaped, and will include a pedesi:rian walk and bicycle path. Separate permits far these improvements will be required. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The proposed project will be located in the Anza Airport Park Subdivision, adjacent to•San Francisco Bay in Burlingame. Until the early 1960's the area was tide and marsh lands. In 1962 and 1963 permits were obtained to fill this property; street patterns and utility systems were laid out with City approval, and work largely completed by 1970. In 1972 the zoning of the area was changed from light industrial to "waterfront commercial"; hotels and motels are a permitted use in this district. The project site is in an area of high seismic activity, although removed from both the San Andreas Fault and the Serra Fault. The natural soils immediately beneath the recent fill consist of highly compressible soft clays with a thickness of about four to five feet. Being close to San Francisco International Airport, the site is subject to 65 CNEL sound levels; this is acceptable for new commercial projects with modest exterior sound attenuation. Air quality in the vicinity is generally good; the site falls within an area which has approximately 15-20 days per year with high oxidant levels (0.10 ppm). Because the site consists of recently compacted fill, none of the animals on the Department of the Interior's "Rare" or "Endangered" species list make use of the property. -2- Present traffic levels on Airport Boulevard (adjacent to the site) are very low at non-peak hours. During peak hours this four lane, central median street still , maintains free flow conditions. All the utility systems in the project area are '. � new and have substantial surplus capacity. - COORDINATION WITK OTHER AGENCIES: The proposed project complies with the terms of the Boundary Settlement and Agreement between the State Lands Commission and Anza Pacific Corporation; this agreement requires that this land be developed in accordance with the City's . "waterfront commercial" district zoning. . � A shoreline permit will be required from the Bay Conservation and �evelopment Commission for landscaping and paving within the 100' shoreline band. The proposed five story moteT will be set�back beyond this 100' band, with the.bulk of the building generally at right angles to the lagoon to further reduce the visual impact from the project. - . � . ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROJECT: - (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided at the conclusion of this � section.) � � ' Yes Maybe No . 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: � � a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes � in geologic substructures? _ X � b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X , � c. Change in topography or ground surfac�. . � relief features? X , . d. The destruction, covering or modification ; _: of any unique geologic or physical features? . X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of �� . soils,.either on or off the site? - X , f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach . . sands, or changes in siltation, deposition. • . or erosion which may modify the channel of � a river or s�tream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? � X � g. Exposure of people or property to geologic • hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, . ... ' �. mudslides, ground failure, or samilar hazards? • X �. 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: � � �• a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of . � ambient air quality? X � b. The creation of objectionable odors? � X . c., Alteration of air movement, moisture or � ' temperature, or any change in climate, � � either locally or regionally? � X -, 3. WATER. ldill the proposal result in: � a. Changes in cur.rents, or the course or . � direction of water movements, in either � marine or fresh waters? � X v , b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X . � d. Ctiange in.the amount of surface water in any water body? X � � , r . -3- e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of. an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4.. PLANT LIFE. 4Ji11 the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or. endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Wiil the proposal result-in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals {birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? .� d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife , habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a.� Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? � b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable �, natural resource? Yes Maybe No X X , X X X X-Favorable X X 0 X X X X X X X X X X X u � � � -4- 10. RISK OF UPSET. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION.- Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation.of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, , or demand for new parking? , c. Substantia7 impact upon existing transportation systems? � d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail.or air traffic? � f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: � a. Fire protection? �� b. Police protection? ' c. Schools? � , d.. Parks or other recreational facilites? e: Maintenance of public facilities, incTuding roads? . � f. Other go�ernmental �ervices? • 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: . a.• Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b., Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the - development of new sources of energy? � 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? � 0 Yes Maybe No X X - X X X� X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X .. , D . -5- Yes Maybe No � � 4 , 17. HUf4AN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potentiai health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing � recreational opportunities? � 20. ARCHEOLOGICAL/NISTORICAL. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: ' a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potentia7' to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term immpact on the environmenl; is one which occurs in a relaiively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) . c. Does the project have impacts which are . individuaTly .limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those � �impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have env.ironmental effects � which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? . X X . X. X X X X X X RESPONSES TO IDENTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: ITEM lb. Earth fill in the amount of 18,000 cubic yards will be imported to bring the site to the elevation of the present curb level. The motel and adjacent office/coffee shop will cover 16% of the 2.89 acre site. ITEM 4a. It is proposed that 24q of the site area shall be developed with landscaping. This will have a very positive effect on what is presently a�barren, compacted earth parking area which is sporadically maintained. ITEM 8. The site consists of 2.9 acres of low lying fill. It is proposed to construct a 214 room five story motel, 43 seat coffee shop, swimming ppol, and paved parking area for 214 cars. ITEM 11. The project will create 30 to 32 basic jobs, which in turn may create 32 to 34 non-basic jobs in the environs. � . �'a � �,:l.r , . ' � -n-� ITEM 12. ITEM 13a. ITEM 13b. ITEM 13d. ITEM 15a. The 30-32 new on-site jobs could result in a modest increase in local housing demand. The project will generate approximately 1800 trip ends per day. Research data indicates that 200 of these trip ends (11% of the average weekday traffic) will occur during the peak traffic period, 4:30 to 5:30 P.M. Table 3(page 13 of the July 28, 1980 Project Assessment prepared by Earth Metrics Incorporated for Days Inn of America) shows that the additional traffic generated by this project, together with present traffic volumes on Airport Boulevard and nearby intersections, will not result in a change in the present "level of service". Traffic flow characteristics are at an acceptable level for urban-areas. A tota7 of 214 parking spaces will be provided on site. See response to Item 13a. Construction of the project will have a short term energy use impact. Long term operation of the motel and restaurant will consume natural gas and electricity. Gasoline consumption of 1350 gallons per day will be demanded by trips generated by the project. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a.significant effect on the• environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. � ( X) I find that ali:hough the �roposed project could have a significant effect . on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because of the mitigation measures t��hich have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. • ( ) I find the proposed project MIaY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. � Date �� Q . . ,��,, � . ��°" 1 � Signat re For CITY OF BURLINGAME . �, "' • EXHIBIT B - NEGATIVE DECLARATION Tentative Procedure 5/10/73, Subject to Revision. T0: . STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 1400 - 10th Street Sacramento, CA.. 95814 Project Title: � DAYS INN OF AMERICA File No. ND-254P Type of Permit: Special Permit to construct a 2.14 room motel which exceeds a Design Guideline (recently established by Council Resolution No. 9-80) requirin a 138' setback from Anza Pacific Boulevard. Legal Description: Rortion of Lots 5 and 6,. Block 5, Anza Airport Park Unit No. 7 (portion of APN 026-344-010/0201. Zone: C-4 "Waterfront Commercial" Property Owner: Name: Anza Shareholders' Liquidating Trust Address: 770 Airport Boulevard Burlingame, CA. 94010 Contact Person: David H. Keyston Area Code: 415 Phone: 342-5711 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The site consists of approximately 126,000 SF of barren, low-lying land fill in the western end of Anza Airport Park, adjacent to both Airport Boulevard and a road reserve for a possible future connection to Bayshore Freeway. The project is a five story motel, 46 feet high, with 214 guest rooms. The motel office will be in a separate one story building, containing a gift shop and small coffee shop with 43 seats; an attached canopy will shelter several gasoline pumps, provided as a convenience to motel guests. The motel, offices and coffee shop will cover 16% of the site. Approximately 75,000 SF (60% of the site) will be paved to provide 214 parking spaces, 39 of which will be for compact cars. The remaining 30,000 SF (24% of the site) will be planted with trees, lawn� and shrubs, and developed with a swimming pool. The southern boundary of the property, adjacent to the Anza area's "inner lagoon", will also be landscaped, and will include a pedestrian walk and bicycle path. Separate permits for these improvements will be required. The City of Burlingame by John R. Yost on July 30, 1980 completed a review of the proposed project and determined that: ( X) It will not have a significant effect on the environment. ( ) No Environmental Impact Report is required. Applicant: Name: C. B. Day Realty of Califo rnia Address: 601 University Avenue Suite 150, Sacramento, CA. 95825 Contact Person: Max F. James, Vice President Are Code: 916 Phone: 920-4427 777 AIRPORT BOULEVARD Project Address or Location l ;� 0 / ��' f,, � „3 o i;" a�r � l�'"- 2�N��Sc� S AN F A`�5 �N� s�'f E. D , n ,t.- � � l? //�0 `�' � G1Cis-,p�/iq 2`��f'�` q'P4:4 o yEe �Q t` � O,P �y '� 9VE' <y ' � � ��° �, � op p � � N o} � P � K'//iTE� a,g� .�«,�s�o J�� y Qo \ P �� p J\Q ,�� rA�� Av� � I' a'` Q, � < G.G �� CyUCq � p � c ec C� ti o O u � s r q < � A � 0} Cp,p�, •Lj� 4<O � v � + �2 'wE� C9 � Au`� �� c,yB4 f},�, � � � �� '�E' �'i AVE � \�� o v '9C 'Uo � Q � � �// �'Jq"F � �V� 'qvE Q � � � � �� \`� P `� AF � � .e � J � 0�� O O C , o o ��P�, �� s� Q �O O a � �" F,'L S <�� -v� � . �liq! u ��'aC� � F E � � � �'� , C�� • � � �o� o J N �i � O �,� � �.i �- : � � � �.��`�% � o�-f--� �! , 4� ti.,.o � �o� f • '; •�. �° /\ `;�, � �, �� 1J�C�C.-�1�: J_ \, ,1• `., �1. ll�ii � L �L. � 1"d � �i�. -�., � •' �i��• BAYSM�E P�'' LACOON -1 � » .. ' _ , - , .- i -. :' _ ' � �3 '1 ,. w,.�.... .. - BO/JO �� QOLLlNS �'� . , _,,. � /.' .. \�/i ��v� Q .�^� �� ,� � , � � r .l�:f �� `�` : v J� /i'�- � �/��\ ��i 1 \o�°� ��y �,�- --------_ Siie Location North . • San F�anctsco 8ay , � � � - - - - —~~y --- �--- — — - .__-.---_ _ _ �.�._."_ � �li. �i � I �' , ��''' ,' � 1. , �, . , '� i i ( .l��' �[k! � .. , . Exfsting O(fice/ � . W rehouse Use � . • . `� � i ( Propased Office Use , Existing Otfice/ , Restaurant Use - . • . . ' I • . - " �e ! � I� ' tagoon . Q�a , � , �l`e� ;�.;.'�,. ' I 'I , . ,� , . i I) ,I1��1 , . � ;;. �. 0a �`.� ��'`�� ' , ,.��, ,,Q . -,�• � �: �'V : � � � �.�- . ��,�f' �� Existing!� tfice/ � War F�ouse Us . /, ,. . . � ; .�. . . .•� � �� - , •��/ ' � � � � ,•' ,�.��' ` ; y �._ ..- ;. � � ,:-.• ; � � � ,.; � �� .�� ' � `� �� Atrport 8oulevard � _ . • -' i `!� ,, �� J ., .•� . ;,; � •• ; � �� " �� "�� f-- Multipte Automobi Parking & Stora e Facilitles �•� O ��• . � �1 :. � , . � . . ; ..I' . _----�___� - " --� - - ; . -- .. . -.- ._._ _-- = _.__ _____. - - - --...__ ; ._.._-,_ ...__� . .. . --- .._.._.-..._..... --- "Lagoon�--�_. �...��``"`.-,�.=��_-K�� , . � • __�.'-`�-__ J.. . ; . Site Loc�tion ' . , . North � eartF� metrics I��,�� I PROJECT SITE PLAI1 I _ ,. , .� ,� , 'o REASONS FOR CONCLUSION: -2- An Initial Study was prepared for this project, and it determined that the project, as modified, will not cause any of the following effects: 1. Conflict with adopted enviranmental plans and goals of the community where it is located; 2. Have a substantial, demonstrable negative aesthetic effect; 3. Substantially affeat a rare or endangered species of animal or plant or the habitat of the species; 4. Interfere substantially with the.movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; 5. Breach published national, state, or local standards re7ating to solid waste or litter control; 6. Substantially degrade water quality; 7. Contaminate a public water supply; 8. Substantially degrade or. deplete.ground water resources; 9. Interfere substantially with ground water recharge; 10. Disrupt or alter an archaeological site over 200 years old, an historic site or a paleontological site except as part of a scientific study of the site; 11. Induce substan.tial growth or concentration of population; � 12. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system; 13. Displace a large number of people; 14. Encourage activities which result in the use of large amounts of fuel or energy; 15. Use fuel or energy in a wasteful manner; 16. Increase substantially the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas; 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Cause substantial flooding; erosion or siltation; Expose people or structures to major geologic hazards; Extend a sewer trunk line with capacity to serve new development; Substantially diminish habitat for fish, wiliilife or plants; Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community; Create a public health hazard or a potential public health hazard; Conflict with established.recreational, educational, religious or scientific uses of the area; 24. Violate any ambient air quality standard, contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, or.expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Julv 30, 1980 ��. �1 Signature of rocessing Official City Planner (Title) Unless appealed within 10 days hereof the date posted, the �etermination shall be final. Date Posted: September 2, 1980_ ._ DECLARATION OF POSTING I declare under penalty of perjury that I am City Clerk of the City of Burlingame and that I posted a true copy of the above Negative Declaration at the City Hall of said City near the doors to the Council Chambers. „ , Executed at Burlingame, California on Appealed: ( )Yes ( )No 1980 ,� � .� �,% ��.GQ EV YN H. HILL CITY CLERK EXHIBIT C - 'INFTIAL�STU�Y Tentative Procedure 5/10/73, Subject to Revision T0: STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 1400 - 10th Street Sacramento, CA. 95814 Project Title: DAYS INN OF AMERICA 777 AIRPORT BOULEVARD Project Address o r Location File No. ND-254P Type of Permit: Special Permit to. construct a 214 room motel which exceeds a Design Guideline (recently established by Council Resolution No. 9-80) requiring a 138' setback from Anza Pacific Boulevard. Legal Description: Portion of Lots 5 and 6, Block 5, Anza Airport Park Unit No. 7 (portion of APN 026-344-010/020) Zone: C-4 "l�laterfront Commercial" Property Owner: Applicant: Name: Anza Shareholders' Liquidating Name: C. B. Day Realty of Trust Cal i forn i a Address: 770 Airport Boulevard Address: 601 University Avenue Burlingame, CA. 94010 Suite.150, Sacramento, CA. 95825 Contact Person: David H. Keyston Contact Person: Max F. James, Vice Area Code: 415 Phone: 342-5711 President Area Code: 916 Phone: 920-4427 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The site consists of approximately 126,000 SF of barren, low-lying land fill in the western end of Anza Airport Park, adjacent to both Airport Boulevard and a road reserve for a possible future connection to Bayshore Freeway. The project is a five story motel, 46 feet high, with 214 guest rooms. Tfie motel office will be in a separate one story building, containing a g9ft shop and small coffee shop with 43 seats; an attached canopy will shelter several gasoline pumps, provided as a aonvenience to motel gues�ts. The motel, offices and coffee shop will cover 16% of the site. Ap�roximately 75,000 SF (60% of the site) will be paved to provide 214 parking spaces, 39 of which will be for compact cars. The remaining 30,000 SF (24% of the site) will be planted with trees, lawn and shrubs, and developed with a swimming pool. The southern boundary of the property, adjacent to the Anza area's "inner lagoon", will also be landscaped, and will include a pedestrian walk and bicycle path. Separate permits for these improvements will be required. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The proposed project will be located in the Anza Airport Park Subdivision, adjacent to San Francisco Bay in Burlingame. Until the early 1960's the area was tide and marsh lands. In 1962 and 1963 permits were obtained to fill this property; street patterns and utility.systems were laid out with City approval, and work largely completed by 1970. In 1972 the zoning of the area was changed from light industrial to "waterfront commercial"; hotels and motels are a permitted use in this district. The project site is in an area of high seismic activity, although removed from both the San Andreas Fault and the Serra Fault. The natural soils immediately beneath the recent fill consist of highly compressible soft clays with a thickness of about zero to three feet. Being close to San Francisco International Airport, the site is subject to 65 CNEL sound levels; this is.acceptable for new commercial projects with modest exterior sound attenuation. Air quality in the vicinity is generally good; the site falls within an area which has approximately 15-20 days per year with high oxidan.t levels (0.10 ppm). Because the site consists of recently compacted fill, none of the animals on the Department.of the Interior's "Rare" or "Endangered" species list make use of the property. -2- Present traffic levels on Airport Boulevard (adjacent to the site) are very low at non-peak hours. During peak hours this four lane, cen.tral median street still maintains free flow conditions. AT1 the utility systems in the project area are new and have substantial surplus capacity. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES: The proposed project com�lies with the terms of the Boundary Settlement and Agreement between the State Lands Commission and Anza Pacific Corporation; this agreement requires that this land be developed in accordance with the City's "waterfront commercial" district zoning. A shoreline permit will be required from the Bay Conservation and aevelopment Commission for landscaping and paving within the 100' shoreline band. The proposed five story motel will be set�back beyond this 100' band, with the,bulk of the building generally at right angles to the lagoon to further reduce the visual impact from the project. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROJECT: (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided at the conclusion of this section.) Yes Maybe No 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? � b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surfac� relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique�geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,.either.on or off the site? f: Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in cur.rents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorptiori rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c.. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X X X X X X X X X X X �l ♦ + -3- Yes Maybe. No e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface.water quality, including but not limited to temp�rature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? � g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of. an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X X X X �7 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X-Favorable b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Wi17 the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals includin.g reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe nois.p levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned use of an area? X 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X X X X X X X � X � Yes Maybe . No 10. RISK OF UPSET. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the loaation, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing �housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X X 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation.of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14.; PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. PoTice protect�ion? c. Schools? d.. Parks or other recreational facilites? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other gou�ernmental �ervi.ces? X X X X X X 15. ENERGY. Will the �roposal result in: a: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utili.ties: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? X X X X X X . � e.. -5- Yes Maybe No 17. HUP�IAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal� result in the creation o-F an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. i�ill the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: E� � 1:1 a. Does the project have the potential to degrade �he quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or.prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term immpact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X c. Does the project have impacts which are . individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have env.ironmental effects - which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly.or indirectly? X RESPONSES TO IDENTIFIED ENVIRONMEN�TAL EFFECTS: ITEM 1b. Earth fill in the amount of 18,000 cubic yards will be imported to bring the site to the elevation of the present curb level. The motel �and adjacent office/coffee shop will cover 16% of the 2.89 acre site: ITEM 4a. It is proposed that 24% of the site area shall be developed with landscaping. This will have a very positive effect on what is presently a barren, compacted earth parking area which is sporadically maintained. ITEM 8. The site consists of 2.9 acres of low lying fill. It is proposed to construct a 214 room five story motel, 43 seat coffee shop, swimming ppol, and paved parking area for 214 cars. ITEM 11. The project will create 30 to 32 basic jobs, which in turn may create 32 to 3� non-basic jobs in the environs. ,�n' � D . ITEM 12. � The.30-32 new on-site jobs could result in a modest increase in local housing demand. ITEM 13a. The project will generate approximat.ely 1800 trip ends per day. Research data indicates that 200.of these trip ends (11/ of the average weekday traffic) will occur during�the peak traffic period, 4:30 to 5:30 P.M. Table 3(page 13 of the July �8, 1980 Project Assessment prepared by Earth. Metrics Incorporated for Days Inn of America) shows that the additional traffic generated by this project, together with present traffic volumes on Airport Boulevard and nearby intersections, will not result in a change in the present "level of service". Traffic flow characteristics are at an acceptable level for urban areas. ITEM 13b. ITEM. 13d. A total of 214 parking spaces will be provided on site. See response to Item 13a. ITEM 15a. Construction of the project will have a short term energy use impact. Long term operation of the motel and restaurant will consume natural . gas and electricity. Gasoline consum�tion of 1350 gallons per day wi17 be demanded by trips generated by the project. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a.significant effect on the environment, arrd a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect � on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because of the mitigation measures which have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. : ( ) I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date ,J 30�4 �� 80 J �. ��' Signat re For CITY OF BURLINGAME �