The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1541 Adrian Rd - Techinical Study�, � �. WILSON ENGINEERING & TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC Traf�'ic Impact Analysis for: A Proposed Karting Track ut I4S1 Adrian Road in the City of Burlingame Prepared for: Gokart Racer Draft: October, 2002 R E C E I V E D NOU 12002 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. ' . . � , . � . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . < .,. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . � . � .. . . . . . .. . . � .. . . . .,..._. . . .i �. . .. . . �.r..... ...._.., � .,. . . 1 . � . �.. i ) � . ..� � Traf�ic Impact Analysis for: A Proposed Karting Track at 1541 Adrian Road Prepared for: Gokart Racer Draft: October, 2002 Wilson Engineering e'r Transportation Conn�ltants, Inc. 70 Zoe Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94107 (415) 974-5071 . , . .:... . ... .. . ..... . .. .....,.. .. ,.,. . _ TABLE OF CONTENTS Sectz'on 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Introduction/ Project Description Existing Setting 2.1 Roadway Network Regional Access Local Access 2.2 Birycle Facilities 2.3 Pedestrian Facilities 2.4 Transit Facilities 2.5 Roadway Operating Characteristics Methodologies Traffic Volumes Existing Levels of Service 2.6 Planned Roadway and Pedestrian Improvements Project Impacts 3.1 Background Traffic Volumes 3.2 Project Traf�ic Volumes 3.3 Evaluation of Project Impacts Background Plus Project Conditions Cumulative Plus Project Conditions 3.4 Parking Appendices A Level of Service Calculations B Traiic and Parking Surveys P—�e 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 4 4 4 6 6 9 10 10 12 1G 16 17 19 A-1 B-1 i LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) Site Location Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Project Related Peak Hour Trip Distribution Project Related Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Background Plus Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Cumulative Plus Project Peak Hour Traffic Voluines Sice Plan LIST OF TABLES m Table 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) Description of Levels of Service for Signalized Intersections Description of Levels of Service for Freeway Segments Freeway Segment Peak Hour Volumes and Levels of Service Existing Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service Background Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service Project Trip Generation and Parking Demand Background plus Project Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service Cumu(ative Plus Project In�ersection Peak Hour levels of Service Page 3 7 13 14 15 18 20 PaQe 5 8 9 11 11 16 17 19 . ii 1. 0 INTROD UCTION/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION The following report has been prepared to analyze and document traffic related impacts associated with a proposed kart facility at 1541 Adrian Road in the Ciry of Burlingame. The report begins with a description of the existing traffic environment in the project viciniry including existing roadway geometrics, existing weekday peak hour levels of service (LOS) at critical intersections, bicycle facilities, transit, and pedestrian facilities. Trips which would be generated by the project are forecast and assigned to the roadway network. Impacts of the project are evaluated focusing on critical intersections which either govern access to the project area or are part of the circulation network of the area. The methodology determines impacts using a peak hour level of service (LOS) format that compares background levels to background plus project levels at four intersections in the area. The proposed project would consist of the construction of a gokart track with ancillary facilities within an existing light industrial building in the Ciry of Burlingame. The site is located o Adrian Road immediately west of U.S. 101 between Broadway and Millbrae Avenue in the Ciry of Millbrae. The building has approximately 73,000 square feet of floor area. The site will be modified with the removal of some loading dock areas and the provision of a total of 100 parking spaces. A total of 60 spaces are adjacent to the building with an additional 40 west of the building in the PG&E/ Drainage Easement area. The project will have a two indoor track configuration occupying approximately 63,000 square feet of floor area with the remaining 10,000 devoted to office, lobby, concessions, and a video arcade. No alcohol will be allowed on the premises. The track will be open for use Sunday through Thursday from 10:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M and on Fridays and Saturdays between 10:00 A.M. and 12:00 A.M. There will be a maximuin of 15 karts on a track at any given time or 30 karts operating on the two tracks with a peak of 13 employees. The target audience is generally adult drivers, families, and corporate clients; it is not considered a spectator type sport. Corporate clients, groups, and private parties will be able to reserve the faciliry for special functions. The following traffic analysis should be considered a worst case scenario from the perspective that it does not assume an allowance for existing trips generated by current use of the site. The analysis assumes all trips generated by the kart facility will be new to the area. The projea is forecast to generate less traffic dian use of the site as a warehousing/office faciliry. The project is forecast �o generate less than 100 trips during the evening peak hour and is therefore exempt from further analysis with regard to the San Mateo Counry CMP. 2. D EXISTING SETTING 2.1 Roadwav Network Regional Access. Regional access is provided to the Ciry of Burlingame and the project area by U.S. Highway 101 (U.S. 101). U.S. 101 is a major regional arterial in the State of California which extends north and south along the westerly side of the Bay linking the Ciry of Burlingame with San Francisco to the north and the Cities of San Mateo, Palo Alto, and San Jose co tlie sourh. It is typically an eight lane facility the length of the peninsula with widenirig using attxiliary lanes 1 at select locations. It is fully improved to freeway status in the project area with four through lanes in each direction and full access (both directions) grade-separated interchanges at Broadway and Millbrae Avenue and limited access (northbound U.S. 101 only) interchanges at Peninsula Avenue and Anza Avenue. U.S. 101 is located east of the project site and is linked to the site by a combination of Broadway and Rollins Road to the south and Millbrae Avenue and Rollins Road to the north. LocalAccess. Local access to the project site and circulation through the area is provided by Adrian Road, David Road, Rollins Road, Millbrae Avenue, and Broadway. A combination of David Road, Rollins Road, Broadway, and California Avenue links the project area with central Burlingame to the south of the site. A combination of Adrian Road, Rollins Road, and Millbrae Avenue links the site with the Ciry of Millbrae and U.S. 101 to the north as indicated in Figure 1. Adrian Road is a minor collector rype roadway extending westerly/ northerly from David Road immediately south of the project site parallel, and adjacent to, U.S. 101 through the project area to Rollins Road immediately south of Millbrae Avenue. Adjacent to the project site, Adrian Road has a curb to curb width of 34 feet with a 5-foot sidewalk on the westerly side. It functions as a frontage road with one lane in each direction. Adjacent land uses are primarily office buildings or light industrial facilities. The intersections of Adrian Road with Rollins Road is controlled with traffic signals. David Road is a minor roadway extending southwesterly from Adrian Road immediately souch of the project site to Rollins Road. Rollins Road is a collector rype roadway extending westerly/ northerly from south of Broadway parallel to U.S. 101 through the project area to Millbrae Avenue. The roadway includes two lanes in each direction with left turn lanes at intersections and major driveways north of Broadway. South of Broadway it functions as a frontage road with one lane in each direction. Adjacent land uses are primarily office buildings or light industrial facilities. The intersections of Rollins Road with Millbrae Avenue and Broadway are controlled with traffic signals. The intersection of Rollins Road with che southbound U.S. 101 ramps/ Cadillac Way is also controlled with traE�ic signals now. Millbrae Avenue is a major arterial type roadway extending westerly from Bayshore Highway on the east side of U.S. Highway 101 through Burlingame to Interstate 280 (I-280). The roadway varies in width between six lanes immediately west of U.S. 101 and four lanes fur�her west towards I-280. Adjacent land uses are primarily office buildings, restaurants, and a new BART station between U.S. 101 and EI Camino Real. Broadway is a four lane arterial between U.S. 101 and California Avenue where it narrows to one lane in each direction and continues westerly past EI Camino Real. Broadway extends over U.S. 101 as a four lane faciliry to Bayshore Highway on the Bay side of U.S. 101. The intersections of Broadway with California Avenue, Carolan Avenue, and Rollins Road are controlled with a traffic signals. 2.2 Bicvcle Faciliries Bicycle facilities include bike paths, bike lanes, and bike routes. Bike paths are pathways 2 PROJECT LOCATION I PROJ. NO.:OI-819 DAT'E: 10/7/2002 I FIGURE N0. WILSON ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 SCALE: N.T.S. 3 separated from roadways and passing vehicles by some type of buffer area or physical barrier. Bike lanes are striped lanes on a roadway reserved for the exclusive use of bicycles. Bike routes are roadways designated as bike routes with signs only. Bike facilities in the grea�er area are limited to a separate, off-street bike path along the shore of the San Francisco Bay which is part of the Bay Trail. There are no bicycle facilities in the immediate project area. 2.3 Pedestrian Facili�ies Pedestrian facilities in the project area include sidewalks on both sides of Rollins Road and Millbrae Avenue> crosswalks at intersections, and pedestrian signal controls for crosswalks at signalized intersec�ions. 2.4 Transit Fuciliries Transit service in the project area is currently provided by SAMTRANS and CalTrain and will be significantly improved in the near future with the BART extension to the San Francisco Airport. The BART extension will include a station at the intersection of Rollins Road and Millbrae Avenue which is currendy under construction. The new BART extension will provide high speed rail access to San Francisco and the East Bay when completed. SAMTRANS Route 292 extends service south from San Francisco on one half hour headways between approximately 5:00 A.M. and midnight. In the northbound direction, the route begins at the Hillsdale Shopping Center in San Mateo, follows EI Camino Real north to Delaware, Delaware to California, California to Broadway in Burlingame, Broadway to Bayshore Highway, and then Bayshore north to San Francisco and the TransBay Terminal at First and Mission Streets. Southbound buses follow the same route in the opposite direction. CalTrain provides regular train service between San Jose and San Francisco with extended service to Morgan Hill and Gilroy during peak commute periods. The nearest CalTrain station is at the intersection of Millbrae Avenue and California Drive in the Ciry of Millbrae. 2.5 Roadwav Opera�ing Characteristics Methodologies. Existing intersection operating characteristics in the project vicinity were evaluated using a peak hour level of service (LOS) analysis reviewing both AM and PM peak hour conditions. An LOS analysis provides a standardized means of describing an intersection or roadway's operating characteristics based upon traf�ic volumes, roadway or intersection capacity, and vehicle delay. The potential LOS range from LOS A representing the best possible or virtually free flow conditions to LOS F representing the worst or jammed conditions. A description of po�ential LOS for signalized intersections is provided in Table 1. LOS at signalized intersections is determined for the intersection as a whole based upon anticipated vehicle delay. 4 Table 1 Description of Levels of Service for Signalized Intersections Average Control or Signal Delay per Vehicle in Seconds LOS Description oiOperations (Highway Capacity Manual) (1) A Uncongesced operadons, little or no delay. Queues clear in a single signal cycle. Progression < 10.00 is generally very favorable. B Operaaons with very light congestion, little or no delay. Drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted as > 10.00 and vehicles fill occasional cycles. Queues clear in a < 20.00 single signal rycle. C Stable operations with light congestion, occasional backups on critical approaches. Drivers may have > 20.00 and . to wait chrough more than one rycle on heaviest < 35.00 approaches D Significant congestion on critical approaches, buc intersection remains functional. Drivers required > 35.00 and to wait through more than one rycle during short < 55.00 peaks. No long-standing queues formed. E Unstable operations with severe congestion and some long standing queues on critical > 55.00 and approaches. Blockage of intersection may occur if < 80.00 traffic signal does not provide for protected turning movements. Traf�ic queues may block nearby intersection(s) upstream of critical approach(s) . F Considered co be unacceptable to most drivers. Traffic demand generally exceeds capacity of the > 80.00 intersection causing stop-and-go operations with excessive delay. (1) The control or signal delay is che delay encountered as a resulc of the traffic signals relative to a free flowing condition where no type of traffic control, congestion, or other hinderance impedes or slows traffic. Control delay includes deceleration, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and acceleration time. Highway Capacity Manua� Special Report 209, (Transponation Research Board, 1997) m , 5 . Freeway operations can also be characterized in the form of peak hour LOS. Levels of service of freeway segments can be determined using several criteria including vehicle densiry expressed in passenger cars per mile per lane or a facility traffic volume to roadway capaciry ratio. The volume to capaciry ratio methodology was utilized in this analysis. A description of LOS for freeway segments is presented in Table 2 Tra�c Yolumes. Existing peak hour traffic volumes at critical intersections are based upon existing peak hour turning movement councs completed in 1998 which have been adjusted to reflect current conditions, and traf�ic counts completed in February, 2001. The adjustment for earlier counts consisted of adding traffic estimates for projects completed and occupied during that period to the baseline counts. AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the intersections of Broadway with Rollins Road, California Drive/ Carolan Avenue; the intersection of Rollins Road with the U.S. 101 southbound ramps at Cadillac Way, and the intersection of Millbrae Avenue at Rollins Road evaluated as part of the project review are shown in Figure 2. Existing peak hour traffic volumes on adjacent segments of U.S. Highway 101 are summarized in Table 3. The volumes are based upon 1990 counts that have been expanded to reflect 2001 conditions. Fxisring Levels af Service. Existing peak hour levels of service (LOS) at the four intersections evaluated are summarized in Table 4. Calculations are provided in Appendi�c A. Review of Table 4 will indicate the signalized intersection of Rollins Road with Millbrae Avenue currendy operates at an LOS C, or reasonably well during both the AM and PM peak periods. The intersection of Broadway with Rollins Road and the U.S. 101 ramps also currently operates reasonably well, or at an LOS C and LOS D during the morning and evening peak periods respectively. The intersection of Broadway and California Drive/Carolan Avenue currendy operates at an LOS F during both peak periods when calculated using the Highway Capacity Manual's computerized LOS methodologies. However, actual field observations indicate the intersections operate closer to LOS E during die evening peak hour as a result of but improvements at the interchange including signal timing modifications. The recently signalized intersection of Rollins Road with Cadillac Drive and the U.S. 101 southbound ramps currently operates at an LOS C during the morning and evening peak hours. Recent improvements to the Broadway/Carolan/Rollins interchange, including signalization of this intersection, signal interconnection, and median left turn lane improvements on Broadway were completed during the summer of 2001. Existing peak hour operating characteristics of nearby segments of U.S 101 are summarized in Table 3. Review of the table will indicate the segments between Millbrae Avenue and Peninsula Avenue currently operate at an LOS E/F during both peak periods. Using a lane capacity of 2,000 vehicles per hour consistent with the San Mateo Congestion Management Program (CMP) the segments operate at an LOS F. Using a lane capaciry of 2,300 vehicles per hour consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 199� yields a peak period LOS E in the peak direction. The CMP standards for these segmencs are: . 6 - pve. m �� ``:: N ' � �4 1 � v�� aaN J1��22n5, —,ose c,�,� 75 (297) 76) 51 _! „4,,8�-� i r 176)510� �a� � N � � � � ...... W � �aav �utstciaca-�a�/� �� °�a �a,j�a Project Site . �d, .- o� > N \ h, i 6�A` � 00 � �NO �I ��\� � 3j�(2151 Z� J r,� �351 g4�i� � �1�g91 y12 w\ � \ 13g51 u` �, � F N� �p J ,/ 101 LEGEND: o A.M PEAtc «:'<::: oo . PM P ::«:;:;;: 000 . . EAK � ':<'' :.........................;::::::::... � ) o �ol_n e� � JO �/�921�12651 r \` � � �� g6 �ZA�91 � ,�� a � � �OZ� �3�^ � o `� �� / ! �� 6l � . �� `�$ J ,\ a .. � � l``La �Z , � � �, �'�b $ RO�� Sqa. 1301 JJ� N ^ � � � � � „' N N � � �° � sa.5 �zi 2� J I l— 47 (103) pe�insula A�e. z � os �,as� o (t�)2a� � �z8> 40 - � i r N (,a)a —` � ; o N ` m ��a en� EXISTING PEAK HOUR TR.AFFIC VOLUMES PROJ. NO.:Ol-819 DATE: 10/10/2002 FIGURE NO. WILSON ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 2 SCALE: N.T.S. ' 7 . Table 2 Description of I.evels of Service for Freeway Segments Maximum Density Maximum V/C cl) i2) LOS Description of Operations A Free flow operations with average operating speeds at, or above, the speed limit. 10.0 0.283 Vehicles are unimpeded in their abiliry to maneuver. B Free flow operations with average operating speeds at the speed limit. Ability to 16.0 0.452 . maneuver is slighcly restricced. Minor incidents may cause some localized deterioration in operations. C Stable operations with average operacing speed near the speed limit. Freedom to � 24.0 0.673 maneuver is noticeably restricted. Minor incidents cause substantial deterioration in service D Speeds begin to decline slightly with increasing flows. Freedom co maneuver is 32.0 0.849 more noticeably restricted. Minor incidents can create queues. No long-standing queues formed. E Operation ac capacity. Vehicle spacing leaves litcle room to maneuver but speeds 43.4 1.000 exceed 40 to 50 mph. Any disruption co the craffic stream can cause waves which propagate back chrough the upstream craffic. F Operations with breakdowns in vehicle flow.. Traffic demand exceeds capaciry of � varies N/A the faciliry causing stop-and-go operations with eaccessive delay. (1) Maximum densiry expressed in passenger cars per mile per lane (2) Volume to Capaciry ratio Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, (Transportacion Research Board, 1994) � ' 8 Millbrae Avenue to Broadway LOS E Broadway to Peninsula Avenue LOS E Peninsula Avenue to SR 92 LOS F Table 3 Freeway Segment Peak Hour Tr�c Volumes and Levels of Semce (1) Southbound U.S. 101 Northbound U.S. 101 Freeway Segment Peak Hour Volume V/C (2) Volume V/C (2) (vph) (vph) Millbrae Avenue to AM 8,614 1.08 8,788 1.10 Broadway PM 7,972 1.00 8,646 1.08 Broadway to AM 8,494 1.06 8,965 1.12 Peninsula Avenue PM 8,028 1.00 8,728 1.09 Peninsula Avenue AM 8,868 1.11 9,094 1.14 to SR 92 PM 8,408 1.05 9,016 1.13 (1) Estimated 1997 volumes based upon 1990 counts with applied growth rate, Traffzc Impact Analysis for 765 Airport Borclevard, (Fehr & Peers Associates, 1997) (2) Based upon a lane capacity of 2,000 vehicles per hour (vph) consistent with the San Mateo County CMP. The Highway Capaciry Manual utilizes a maximum lane capaciry of 2,300 vph which would indicate all freeway segments operating at a peak hour LOS E or better. 2.6 Planned Roadway and Pedestrian Improvements The City of Burlingame, together with Caltrans and the San Mateo Counry Transportation Authoriry, are currently coordinating a series of improvements for U.S. 101 and the Broadway interchange. The first set of improvements include auxiliary lanes on U.S. 101 between interchanges and a pedestrian overcrossing of U.S. 101 immediately south of the Broadway overcrossing. The pedestrian bridge would extend from the southwest corner of the interchange across the freeway and touch down at the southwest corner of the intersection of Airport Boulevard with Bayshore Highway and the northbound U.S. 101 off-ramp. The project is programmed in the counry's transportation improvement plan (Measure A fundin� and could be constructed in Year 2004. Y � 9 - The second set of improvements being contemplated for the Broadway interchange involves a reconfiguration and complete reconstruction of the entire interchange. The project will include a provision for a pedestrian crossing, either by preserving the bridge discussed above or constructing an alternative. The pedestrian access will extend across the freeway to the southwest corner of a reconfigured intersection of Broadway, Bayshore Highway, and Airport Boulevard in some form. 3.0 PROJECT IMPACTS Project related impacts to the roadway network are evaluated using a peak hour intersection LOS analysis as previously described. The LOS analysis consists of a comparison of future roadway operations with the project to future conditions without the project. Conditions without the project are labeled Background Conditions and include existing traffic volumes plus traffic which will be generated by projects which have been approved but are not yet occupied. Neither the Ciry of Burlingame or San Mateo County have adopted criteria for the determination of impacts to intersections already operating at an LOS E or LOS F. The criteria used to determine an impact as significant in this study were as follows: If the proposed project would reduce an Existing or Base Case condition LOS below LOS D. Should a base case LOS already be at LOS E or F at a signalized or all-way stop intersection, or LOS E or LOS F at a two-way stop controlled intersection, the City shall determine what level of increase in traf�ic volumes or delay due to the proposed project would be considered significant. 3.l Background Tra�c Yolumes Background Condition traffic volumes (Scenario 1) were developed by adding trip generation forecasts for already approved but uncompleted projects to existing peak hour traffic volumes. Review with City of Burlingame staff indicated a total of five projects which currently have approval status but are un-built or unoccupied. These include 1550 Bayshore Boulevard, 1755 Bayshore Boulevard, 301 Airport Boulevard, 1660 and 1832/1860 Rollins Road. Tra�c forecasts for che projects were obtained from traffic impact studies or other reports completed for the projects. These were then added to existing peak hour volumes to provide Background Condition traffic volumes. Scenario 1 Background Condition peak hour LOS are summarized in Table 5. Review of the table and comparison to existing condition LOS in Table 4 will indicate completion of currently approved projects is forecast to have a minor impact on peak hour operating characteristics of surrounding intersections. All intersections are forecast to continue operating at existing LOS while experiencing very minor increases in delay. Existing levels of delay at signalized intersections are forecast to reinain virtually unchanged (change less than one second except at Rollins/Broadway during the eveiiing when delay is forecast to increase by 1.7 seconds}. ' 10 Table 4 Existing Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service (1) Type Traf�'ic A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Control Delay (2) LOS Delay (2) LOS Rollins Road/ Millbrae Avenue Signalized 21.1 C 23.6 C Broadwy/Rollins/U.S.IOlOverpass Signalized 30.5 C 46.5 D Broadway/ California-Carolan* Signalized 147.3 F 89.0 F Cadillac Way/ Rollins Road /U.S. 101 Signalized 27.6 C 32.1 C (1) Signalized intersections evaluated using methodologies described in �he Highway Capacity Manua� Spaial Report 209, (Transportation Research Board, 1997). (2) Delay = average control or signal related vehicle delay for vehicles entering the intersection iE 1997 methodology. * Note delay and LOS results do not assume long term planned improvements, ocher than recent signalization oE the interseccion of Rollins Road and Cadillac Way, are compleced. Table 5 Scenario 1- Background Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service (1) Type Traffic A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Control Delay (2) LOS Delay (2) LOS Rollins Road/ Millbrae Avenue Signaliud 21.8 C 24.5 C Broadwy/Rollins/U.S.101 Overpass Signalized 31.3 C 48.2 D Broadway/ California-Cazolan* Signaliud 147.3 F 89.0 F Cadillac Way/ Rollins Road /U.S. 101 Signaliud 27.7 C 32.6 C (1) Signalized intersections and unsignaliud intersections evaluated using methodologies described in the Highway Capacity Manua� Special Rtport 209, (Transportation Research Board, 1997). (2) Delay = average control or signal related vehicle delay for vehicles entering the intersection iE 1997 methodology. * Noce delay and LOS results do not assume long term planned improvements, other than recent signalization of the intersection of Rollins Road and Cadillac Way, are completed. 11 " 3.2 Proiect Tra„�'ic Yolumes Estimates of the number of trips which would be generated by the project were developed using surveys of trip and parking generation at a similar type of karting facility in the City of Santa Clara where operations were surveyed on a Thursday, Friday, and Saturday. The project sponsor has indicated the track will be open seven days a week from 11:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. The track will be open to the general public typically, however, the track can be rented/ reserved for corporate or private parties as well. Use of a kart track increases on Thursdays and Fridays and peaks on Saturdays. The results of surveys of �he track in Santa Clara are included in Appendix B and summarized in Table 6. Review of the table will indicate the track generated 9 and 8 outbound trips during a Thursday evening peak hour when open to the public and 2 inbound and 2 outbound trips during a Friday evening peak hour when the track was reserved for a corporate function. Trips were observed to be more dispersed throughout the day on a Saturday (less of a peaking characteristic). The project is forecast to generace no traffic during the morning commute period, the track will not open until 10:00 A.M. It should also be noted that this analysis provides a worst case scenario where it does not include any allowance for trips currently generated by warehousing use of the site. Using trip generation rates from the Impact Analyzer developed for warehouse and office uses in the Bayfront and Anza Areas, the existing 73,000 square feet of floor area would generate approximately 29 inbound and 82 outbound trips during the evening peak hour. or considerably inore than the proposed project. Trip forecasts were then distributed to the surrounding area based general traffic volumes in the area, relative proximity to and congestion levels at �he Broadway versus Millbrae Avenue interchanges. Finally the trips were assigned to the roadway network and specific intersections based upon anticipated peak hour routes which would be followed to achieve the e�cpected distribution. To and from the west/ EI Camino Real 30% To and from the east of U.S. 101 10% To and from the South via U.S. 101 30% To and from the North via U.S. 101 30% The� assignment of project related tra�c oriented to and from the area east of U.S. 101 assumes use of either the Millbrae Avenue interchange or the Broadway interchange to cross U.S. 101. Vehicles from areas on Bayshore Highway near Broadway or along Airport Boulevard south of Broadway should be expected to use the Broadway overcrossing to Rollins Road and follow Rollins Road north to the project site. Vehicles from areas along Bayshore Highway near Millbrae Avenue should be expected to use the Millbrae Avenue overcrossing to Rollins Road and follow Rollins Road south to the project site. Traffic from the north on U.S. 101 was assumed to follow U.S. 101 to Millbrae Avenue and then Millbrae Avenue easterly to Rollins Road. Traffic from the south on U.S. 101 was assumed to follow U.S. 101 to Broadway and then Broadway westerly to Rollins Road. The distribution of inbound and outbound project related peak hour traffic is shown in Figure 3. The assignment of project traffic volumes to the roadway network is summarized in Figure 4. Background plus project traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 5. ; 12 PROJECT RELATED PEAK HOUR TRIP DISTRIBUTION WILSON ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJ. NO.:Ol-819 DATE: 10/7/2002 � FIGURE NO. SCAI.E: N.T.S. 3 _ . • 13 ' pve. y. �� d 1 O O O JI��c�, — o co) (3) c°, ° J 1 I ( co> o �2� o � 000 �oco C7CNY e7"2Q�/LfiL6C0� tlJCGj/i �o�a ��9 Project Site � o`�� do 0 �� QO / m O ` � \ ` � p �3� J ° l» p i. � � l� l � � o o ad,NaY � o00 ��o J �aJ LEGEND: 9��'a 000 L�.M. PEAK (7:30-8:30 AM) 101 �000� P.M. PEaic (a:3o-s:so PM� o �ol 0 0 � ��l �� /ool � J \ / J \` r � r l�l � ,\ O / �� \/�110 �l� ^� 0� �� ol� �� J ,�� . � / ��1� ^ o � �ol° omo 000 � 0(0) ��—o(oy 0 (0) �°, ° � 1 I � �o>o �O�O � 000 O O O 90/�� 9d penins�a Z 0 � N O � � PROJECT RELATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROJ. rro.:os-si9 '• DATE: 10/8/2002 FIGURE N0. WILSON ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 4 SCAI.E: N.T.S. 14 ' pve. � \d 1 � �� < V N °i �1D � 22 (15) —1064 (171f J l � 99 (324) 76) 51 J , 119) 1855— �1 I � 194) 528 � � c� � N V � � .�. � ........ �ioiv ° �iciaca�� o�a ��9 Project Site a�,�a / �. ' � � � � � � a, �, � o`' . � � � ey ` � N� � .� ��\` � 316��20 so J \� �'?'� 1�36� 1��^ 1 ll�y�5�2 w�� w�o`b .N.-' m � 10 � LEGEND: AM P :>:::<::> o00 . . �,ic PM P >:::::::<:;: o00 . . E,�c <:........ ( ) , �� :::::::::::: .... .. . .. .. , __ o �°�51 0 0 0 �/�g2�,l.Lybl � � o� � �� 196 Z 261 i�\ m Jo�,`'� i,9�� oi��, ��lg �� \ �� \! � �651 � $ ) J -� � � a w� o �l�y� 2� ^ � � ��, � l"�� g $ .� Rp��\ 9a % �� '�� N � `� � tO � 688 �23� Jll-4�c,o3 09 (185 (11) 28 ---� �28,40- � i r t14) 4 —` o � � N \ v�� penin� Z 0 � � la BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES' PROJ. N0.:02-819 DATE:10�5/2002 FIGURENO. WILSON ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 5 SCN.E: N.T.S. � 15 , .... ..,.� � , , . � �r..,..., ......, . , , , . . r. . . , . . ., . . . .. . . . Table 6 Project Trip Generation and Pazking Demand (1) Day of Week/Type of Daily Traffic P.M. Peak Hour Peak Parking Demand Use (2) Traffic Thursday/ 82- One-Way Trips 8 Inbound/ 26 spaces Open to (3:30 to 9:30 P.M.) 9 Oucbound (9:00 P.M.) Public (4:45 - 5:45 P.M.) Friday/ 30- One-Way Trips 2 Inbound/ 23 spaces Corporate (3:00 to 9:00 P.M.) 2 Outbound (4:30 P.M.) Function (4:30 - 5:30 P.M.) Saturday/ 125- One-Way Trips 3 Inbound/ 30 spaces Open to (11:00 A.M. to 9:00 4 Outbound (3:00 P.M.) Public P.M.) (4:45 - 5:45 P.M.) (1) Based upon surveys of an existing Kart facility in the Ciry of Santa Clara. Three to four people arrive per vehicle regularly. (2) Open to public use versus reserved for a corpora�e function 3.3 Evaluation of Pro�ect Impacts Based Upon LOS Background Plus Project Conditions. Impacts of the proposed project on future operacing characteristics of the roadway network were evaluated by comparing Scenario 1 Background Conditions to Scenario 2 Background Plus Proposed Project Conditions. Operating characteristics for both scenarios are quantified and documented using the previously described LOS analysis. The results of the analysis are summarized in Table 7. Review of the table and coinparisoi� to background condition LOS in Table 5 will indicate completion of the proposed project should not have a significant impact on peak hour operating characteristics of surrounding intersections. Review of the table and comparison to Scenario 1 background condition LOS in Table 5 will indicate completion of the proposed project is forecast to have a minor impact on peak hour operating characteristics of surrounding intersections. All intersections are forecast to continue operating at background LOS while experiencing very minor increases in delay. Delay at the four intersections is forecast to remain unchanged. Background levels of delay at the signalized intersection of Broadway with Rollins Road are forecast to remain virtually unchanged (change less than one second). The intersection is forecast to experience an increase in control related delay of 0.2 seconds per vehicle during the morning peak hour and 0.G seconds during the evening peak hour without any change in LOS. _ � Background levels of delay at the signalized intersection of Broadway with Carolan-California are forecast to remain unchanged. The intersection is forecast to experience virtually no changes in delay during either the morning peak hour or the evening peak hour. Background levels of delay at the signalized intersection of Millbrae Avenue with Rollins Road are also forecast to remain virtually unchanged. The intersection is forecast to experience an increase in delay of 0.7 seconds during the morning peak hour and 0.9 seconds during the evening peak hour. Background LOS is forecast to remain unchanged (LOS C). Table 7 Scenario 2- Background Plus Project Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service (1) Type Traffic A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Control Delay (2) LOS Delay (2) LOS Rollins Road/ Millbrae Avenue Signaliud 21.8 C 24.5 C B�oadwy/Rollins/U.S.101 Overpass Signaliud 31.3 C 48.2 D Broadway/ California-Carolan Signalized 147.3 F 88.9 F Cadillac Way/ Rollins Road /U.S. 101 Signalized 27.7 C 32.6 C (1) Signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections evaluated using methodologies described in the Highway Capacity Ma�:iut� Special Report 209, (Transportation Research Board, 1997). (2) Delay = average control or signal related vehicle delay for vehicles en�ering �he interseccion if 1997 methodology. * Note delay and LOS results do not assume long term planned improvements, other than recent signalization of the intersection of Rollins Road and Cadillac Way, are completed. Cumulatzve Plus Pro�ect Condirions. Cumulative traf�ic conditions assuming existing plus background plus project plus traffic which would be generated by other projects proposed in the City of Burlingame as well as completion of the new BART station at Millbrae Avenue and Rollins Road were also evaluated to provide a more long term perspective as well. The potential projec�s in the Ciry of Burlingame which were included in the cumulative scenario (Scenario 3} are a potential 600 room hotel at 620 Airport Boulevard and a 17,000 square foot of�ice development at 1220 Bayshore Boulevard. Forecasts of peak hour traffic associated with the new Millbrae BART Station at the northwest corner of the intersection of Millbrae Avenue and Rollins Road in the Ciry of Millbrae were obtained from BART. Scenario 3 traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 6. The results of the peak hour LOS analysis of Scenario 3 conditions are summarized in Table 8. Review of the table will indicate continued cumulative development is forecast to cause continued increases in peak hour delay at surrounding intersections. The intersection of Broadway with _ - 17 pve. n �� avo m � � � 528 (31) —1009(181E J � /— 11 (352) 56) 269 J ( 132) 2095— � I I� 181)530� �m� N � N � vv� ........ B �+� �. 0 � � �4 1 �aat� �iaszci�,o-�a� ��a �o�" Project �a�ld � a N ��,.�h� � ! � � �O` �N�� I ��\ � �\ ~ � 31 � (?1 o J �9n2� 1�36121 �a � �\ la�y�5�2 ��,��rm� l ��'�$�� J � � �Ol ' l o p o� 600 ��126 l � �\� � � 6 � �6± 26�� J \� �O� � ��19�,``p36 � A1/��6' �o��,$ /�65 Z a�al��^'�, JCb� \ �� ( � �661 s $ 7 J -�\�a� .. �l �;�Z� ^ ��;.�w �� \ �3°� �o S � r �� ze �2�z JIl-4�c,o3> /""" 19 (185) (11) 28 J �28, 40 - � i r �14)4 � Nnv� �n � � CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 0 � 0 � � PROJ. N0.:02-819 - DATE: 10/5/2002 FIGURE N0. WILSON ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 6 SCALE: N.T.S. . , 18 , � Q� LEGEND: P A M EAx >::::> o00 . . PM P [:>i:::: 000 . . EAK . . [::::::::. � ) »:::;::: ;:::<::;:>;;:»`:<;':::>; :::::::::.......... \ .......... ... ._._. _ _ 9��\ s,9 a, California Avenue is forecast to continue •operating at an LOS F during peak periods. A.M. peak hour operating characteristics of the intersection of Millbrae Avenue with Rollins Road are forecast to deteriorate from LOS C to LOS D as a result of the new BART Station while the intersections of Broadway with Rollins Road and Rollins Road with Cadillac Way are forecast to experience continued increases in delay but continue to operate at Scenario 2 LOS. It should also be noted that the cumulative LOS forecasts summarized in Table 8 do not assume planned improvements to the Broadway/U.S. 101. The intersections of Broadway with California/Carolan and Rollins/ Cadillac Way will operate at better LOS �han shown in Table 8 when planned improvements are completed. Table 8 Scenario 3- Cumulative Plus Project Intersection Peak Hour Levels of Service (1) , Type Traffic A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection . Control Delay (2) LOS Delay (2) LOS Rollins Road/ Millbrae Avenue Signaliud 48.7 D 33.3 C Broadwy/Rollins/U.S.101 Overpass Signaliud 31 S C 48.8 D. Broadway/ California-Carolan * Signalized 147.3 F 89.0 F Cadillac Way/ Rollins Road /U.S. 101 Signaliud 28.1 C 32.6 C (1) Signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections evaluated using mechodologies described in the Highway Capacity Man:ra� Spccial Repvrt 209, (TransPortation Research Board, 1997). (2) Delay = average control or signal related vehicle delay for vehicles entering the intersection. * Note delay and LOS results do not assume planned improvements. Intersection will operate better than shown when planned improvements, including signalization of the intersection of Rollins Road with Cadillac Way are completed. 3.4 ParkinQ This section provides a discussion of potential parking demand and the project's abiliry to accommodate that demand. As indicated in Table 6, surveys of an existing track in Santa Clara showed parking demand to peak on a Saturday with 30 occupied spaces. Figure 7 shows a schematic of the proposed parking configuration at the site with approximately 60 parking spaces. Another 40 will be available in the PG&E/ drainage easement located at the west edge of the site. A total of 100 parking spaces should be more than enough to accommodate parking demand that might be generated by the proposed project. Even if the proposed project were to generate twice the demand the Santa Clara site currently generates, it could be accommodated on site (60 ± spaces}. The parking configuration will also need to include at least three accessible spaces adjacent to the building and an additional accessible space in the nearby lot. All spaces need to be striped in accordance with the requirements of the Ciry of Burlingame. 19 . i N _ --' O R Sowce: Dennis Kobza & Associates, lnc., 2002 WILSON ENGINEERING & TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. SITE PLAN I � BAR SCALE NORTH o a ev �a PROJ. NO.: Q2•81� FlGURE NO. DATE:1�7/2002 7 i APPENDIX A Level of Service Calculations Short Report . Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information alyst ; JW Intersection Broadway & Rollins gency or Co. E3urlingame, CA rea Type All otherareas Date Performed 10/15/02 urisdiction ime Period AM - Exist alysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 2 3 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 Lane group L TR R T R LT LT R olume v h 230 1084 512 692 430 35 85 70 235 95 % Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen � 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 11.0 G= 24.0 G= 16.0 G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 95.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 256 1204 569 769 478 133 339 106 Lane group cap. 405 129 969 912 517 497 1029 510 /c ratio 0.63 0.57 0.59 0.84 0.92 0.27 0.33 0.21 reen ratio 0.12 0.60 0.60 0.25 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.32 Unif. delay d1 40.1 11.5 11.7 33.7 38.9 24.3 24.8 23.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 7.2 1.0 2.5 9.7 32.7 1.3 0.8 0.9 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 47.2 12.5 i4.2 43.5 71.6 25.5 25.6 24.7 Lane group LOS D B 8 D E C C C pprch. delay i7.4 54.2 25.5 25.4 pproach LOS B D C C Intersec. delay 30.5 Intersection LOS C HCS2000�`� Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1b tile://C:\Documents%20and�lo20Settings�Administrator�I.oca1%20Settin�s\Temp\s2k137... 10/31/2002 epo SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst JW Intersection 8roadway & Rollins gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type �11 oiher areas Date Performed 10/15/02 urisdiction � "' ime Period PM - Exist nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 2 3 i 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 Lane group L TR R T R LT LT R olume v h 135 789 365 932 545 32 80 i25 465 150 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 7.0 G= 30.0 G= 20.0 G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 101.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 150 877 406 1036 606 125 656 167 Lane group cap. 243 214 1007 1072 608 335 965 480 /c ratio 0.62 0.40 0.40 0.97 1.00 0.37 0.68 0.35 reen ratio 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.30 Unif. delay d1 45.7 9.5 9.6 35.0 40.5 28.1 31.3 27.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 11.2 0.5 1.1 30.5 68.1 3.0 3.7 1.9 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 56.9 10.0+ 10.7 65.5 i08.6 31.1 35.0+ 29.7 Lane group LOS E B 8 E F C D C pprch. delay 15.1 81.4 31.1 33.9 pproach LOS B F C C Intersec. delay 46.5 Intersection LOS D HCS2000� Copyright � 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1b file://C:�Documents%20and°Io20Settings�Administrator�L,oca1%20Settings\Temp\s2k13A... 10/31/2002 Short Report � Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information � � ite Information nalyst JW " Intersection Broadway & Rollins gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All other areas Date Performed 10/3/2002 urisdiction ime Period AM -Background alysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 2 3 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 Lane group L TR R T R LT LT R olume v h 230 1101 512 707 435 35 85 71 239 97 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0. 90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A � P P P. P P P P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parkingmr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= ii.0 G= 24.0 G= 16.0 G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 95.0 Lane Grou Ca acit , Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 256 1223 569 786 483 133 345 108 Lane group cap. 405 129 969 912 517 496 1029 510 /c ratio 0.63 0.57 0.59 0.86 0.93 0.27 0.34 0.21 reen ratio 0.12 0.60 0.60 0.25 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.32 Unif. delay di 40.1 11.6 11.7 33.9 39.0 24.3 24.9 23.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 7.2 1.1 2.5 11.2 36.0 1.3 0.8 0.9 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 47.2 i2.7 14.2 45.1 75.0 25.6 25.7 24.7 Lane group LOS D 8 B D E C C C pprch. delay 17.4 56.5 25.6 25.5 pproach LOS B E C C Intersec. delay 3i.3 Intersection LOS C ffCS2000�i1 Copyright � 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Rescrved Version 4.1b file://C:�Documents°1o20and%20Settings�Administrator\Local%20Settings�Temp�.s2k 1390... 10/31/2002 Short Report . , - Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst ; JW Intersection Broadway & Rollins gency or Co. - Burlingame, CA rea Type All otherareas Date Performed 10/3/02 urisdiction ime Period PM -Background nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin in ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TN RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 2 3 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 ane group L TR R T R LT LT R olume v h 135 797 365 938 549 32 80 127 470 152 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P p p p p p p p tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 i2.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/h r Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 iming G= 7.0 G= 30.0 G= 20.0 G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 - cle Len th C= 101.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 150 886 406 f042 6i0 125 663 169 Lane group cap. 243 214 1007 1072 608 332 965 480 /c ratio � 0.62 0.40 0.40 0.97 1.00 0.38 0.69 0.35 reen ratio 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.30 Unif. delay d1 45.7 9.5 9.6 35.1 40.5 28.1 31.4 27.9 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 11.2 0.5 1.1 33.3 74.3 3.1 3.9 1.9 PF factor 1.000 i.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i.000 1.000 ontrol delay 56.9 i0.0+ 10.7 68.4 1 i4.8 31.2 35.2 29.8 ane group LOS E B B E F C D C pprch. delay 15.1 85.5 31.2 34.1 pproach LOS B F C C Intersec. delay 48.2 Intersection LOS D HGSZ000'"' c:opynght m ZWO University oFFlorida, All Rights Resmed Version 4.Ib file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator\Loca1�o20Settings\Temp�s2k 139... 10/31/2002 Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst i JW Intersection Broadway & Rollins gency or Co: Burlingame, CA rea Type All other areas Date Performed � 10/3/02 urisdiction �� ime Period AM -Background + Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 2 3 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 Lane group L TR R T R LT LT R olume v h 230 1101 512 707 435 35 85 71 239 97 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 ctuated P/A P P p p p p p p p p tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen ' 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 � 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 iming G= 11.0 G= 24.0 G= 16.0 G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 95.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 256 1223 569 786 483 133 345 i08 Lane group cap. 405 129 969 912 517 496 1029 510 /c ratio 0.63 0.57 0.59 0.86 0.93 0.27 0.34 0.21 reen ratio 0.12 0.60 0.60 0.25 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.32 Unif. delay d1 40.1 11.6 11.7 33.9 39.0 24.3 24.9 23.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 7.2 1.1 2.5 11.2 36.0 1.3 0.8 0.9 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 47.2 12.7 i4.2 45.1 75.0 25.6 25.7 24.7 Lane group LOS D B B D E C C C pprch. delay 17.4 56.5 25.6 25.5 pproach LOS B E C C Intersec. delay 31.3 Intersection LOS C fICS2G0UT � Copyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Rescn•ed Version 4.Ib file://C:\Documents%20and�o20Settin�sWdministrator\Loca1�o20Settings\Temp\s2k 13A... 10/31/2002 Short Report - � _ . Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst � JW Intersection Broadway & Rollins gency or �'o. Burlingame, CA rea Type All otherareas Date Performed 10/3/02 urisdiction ime Period PM -Background + Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 2 3 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 2 i Lane group L TR R T R LT LT R olume v h 135 797 365 938 549 32 80 127 473 153 % Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu (ost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 7.0 G= 30.0 G= 20.0 G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 101.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate i50 886 406 1042 610 125 667 170 ane group cap. 243 214 1007 . 1072 608 331 965 480 /c ratio 0.62 0.40 0.40 0.97 1.00 0.38 0.69 0.35 reen ratio 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.30 Unif. delay di 45.7 9.5 9.6 35. i 40.5 28.1 31.4 27.9 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 11.2 0.5 1.1 33.3 74.3 3.1 3.9 2.0 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 56.9 lO.Ot 10.7 68.4 114.8 31.2 35.3 29.8 Lane group LOS E B B E F C D C pprch. delay 15.1 85.5 31.2 34.2 pproach LOS B F C C Intersec. delay 48.2 Intersection LOS � HCS2000� Copyright m 2000 Univcrsity of Flotida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1b iile://C:�Documents°1o20and%20Settin�sWdministrator\Local�%20Settings\Temp\s2k 13B... 10/31/2002 �:; : � , . � Short Report Page 1 of 1_ SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information alyst; JW Intersection Broadway & Rollins � gency or'Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All otherareas •.. �ate Performed 10/8/02 urisdiction ime Period AM -Cumulative + Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 2 3 i 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 Lane group L TR R T R LT LT R olume v h 230 1118 512 714 435 35 85 71 239 95 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 11.0 G= 24.0 G= i6.0 G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= iming y_ 3 Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 95.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 256 1242 569 793 483 133 345 106 Lane group cap. 405 129 969 912 5i7 496 i029 510 /c rat io 0.63 0.58 0.59 0.87 0.93 0.27 0.34 0.2 i reen ratio 0.12 0.60 0.60 0.25 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.32 Unif. delay di 40.1 11.7 11.7 34.0 39.0 24.3 24.9 23.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 7.2 1.1 2.5 11.9 36.0 1.3 0.8 0.9 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 47.2 12.8 14.2 45.9 75.0 25.6 25.7 24.7 Lane group LOS D B B D E C C C pprch. delay i7.5 56.9 25.6 25.5 pproach LOS B E C C Intersec. delay 31.5 Intersection LOS C NCS2000� Copyright � 2000 University of Florida, All Riohu Reserved Version 4.1b iilz://C:\Documents%20and%20Settin�s�Administrator�L.oca1�o20Settings\Temp\s2k 13C... 10/31/2002 Short Report � Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst JW Intersection Broadway & Rollins gency o� Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All otherareas Date Performed 10/8/02 urisdiction ime Period PM -Cumulative + Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 2 3 i 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 Lane group L TR R T R LT LT R olume v h 135 813 365 942 549 32 80 127 473 153 % Hea veh 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N D N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT Thru & RT 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 7.0 G= 30.0 G= 20.0 G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 101.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 150 903 406 1047 610 125 667 170 Lane group cap. 243 214 1007 1072 608 331 965 480 /c ratio 0.62 0.4i 0.40 0.98 i.00 � 0.38 0.69 0.35 reen ratio 0.07 0.62 0.62 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.30 Unif. delay d1 45.7 9.6 9.6 35.2 40.5 28.1 31.4 27.9 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 1 i.2 0.5 1. i 36.0 74.3 3.1 3.9 2.0 PF factor i.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 56.9 10.1 10.7 71.1 114.8 31.2 35.3 29.8 Lane group LOS E B 8 E F C D C pprch. delay 15.1 87.2 31.2 34.2 pproach LOS 8 F C C Intersec. delay 48.8 Intersection LOS D NCS2000�� Copyright m 2000 Univcrsity of Florida, All Righu Rcscrved Vcrsion 4.1b file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settinas�Administrator\Local%20Settings\Temp�s2k 13C... 10/31/2002 Short Report - , Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information alyst JW Intersection Broadway & California gency or'Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All other areas Date Performed 10/15/02 urisdiction ime Period AM - Exist nalysis Year 01-807 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 Lane group L TR L T L T L TR olume v h 250 431 25 165 182 30 375 390 445 10 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0.90 0. 90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost iime 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 i2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl Thru & RT 04 SB Onl NS Perm 07 08 G= 20.0 G= 16.0 G= 36.0 G= G= 18.0 G= 20.0 G= G= iming Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 - cle Len th C= i30A Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 278 507 i83 202 33 417 433 505 Lane group cap. � 226 809 181 668 82 555 396 612 /c ratio 1.23 0.63 1.01 0.30 0.40 0.75 1.09 0.83 reen ratio 0.15 0.28 0.12 0.43 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.32 Unif. delay d1 55.0 41.1 57.0 24.2 49.6 52.6 56.0 40.6 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 53.1 3.7 144.8 1.2 14.6 9.6 10.7 13.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 08.1 44.8 01.8 25.4 64.2 62.2 66.7 53.9 ane group LOS F D F C E E F D pprch. delay 208.9 f09.3 62.4 152• i pproach LOS F F E F Intersec. delay 147.3 Intersection LOS ; F HCS2000� Copyright m 2000 Universiry of Florida, A11 Rights Reserved ' Version 4.1b file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�Loca1%20Settings\Temp�s2k12F... -10/31/2002 Short Report . � � Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst JW Intersection Broadway & California gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type AUotherareas Date Performed 10/15/02 urisdiction ime Period PM -Exist nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 i 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 Lane group L TR L T T L TR olume v h 115 284 30 265 419 265 265 405 10 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl Thru & RT 04 SB Onl NS Perm 07 08 G= 18.0 G= 20.0 G= 22.0 G= G= 13.0 G= 20.0 G= G= iming y_ 4 Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 113.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. ilow rate 128 349 294 466 294 294 461 Lane group cap. 234 565 261 631 336 329 620 /c ratio 0.55 0.62 1.13 0.74 0.88 0.89 0.74 reen ratio 0.16 0.19 0.18 0.41 0.18 0.12 0.33 Unif. delay d1 43.7 41.7 46.5 28.4 45.3 49.3 33.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 9.2 5.1 77.9 7.9 32.7 38.3 8.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 52.9 46.8 324.4 36.3 78.0 87.6 42.1 Lane group LOS D D F D E F D pprch. delay 48.4 147.8 78.0 59.8 pproach LOS D F E E Intersec. delay 89.0 Intersection LOS `� F HCS2U00�`� Copyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Righu Reserved . Version 4.1b file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�Loca1°Io20Settings\Temp�s2k 1303... 10/31/2002 Short Report ' Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst JW ��- Intersection Broadway & California gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All other areas Date Performed 10/4/02 urisdiction ime Period AM - Background nalysis Year Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 Lane group L TR L T L T L TR olume v h 250 450 25 165 193 30 375 390 445 10 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 i2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl Thru & RT 04 SB Onl NS Perm 07 08 G= 20.0 G= 16.0 G= 36.0 G= G= 18.0 G= 20.0 G= G= iming Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 130.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 278 528 J83 214 33 417 433 505 Lane group cap. 226 809 181 668 82 555 396 612 /c ratio 1.23 0.65 1.01 0.32 0.40 0.75 1.09 0.83 reen ratio 0.15 0.28 0.12 0.43 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.32 Unif. delay d1 55.0 41.5 57.0 24.4 49.6 52.6 56.0 40.6 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 53.1 4.2 144.8 1.3 14.6 9.6 10.7 13.3 PF factor f.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 508. i 45.6 01.8 25.7 64.2 62.2 66.7 53.9 ane group LOS F D F C E E F D pprch. delay 205.1 i06.9 62.4 152.1 pproach LOS F F E _ F Intersec. delay 146.1 Intersection LOS ` F HCS2000�`� CoQyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reservcd Version 4.1b file://C:�Documents°1o20and°1o20Settings�Administrator�Loca1%20Settings\Temp�s2k 12C... 10/31 /2002 Short Report - Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information alyst JW Intersection Broadway & California gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All other areas Date Performed 10/7/02 urisdiction ime Period PM -Background , nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 i 0 Lane group L TR L T T L TR olume v h 115 294 30 265 425 265 265 405 10 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P A P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width i2.0 12.0 12.0 i2.0 12.0 12.0 i2.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/h r Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl Thru & RT 04 SB Onl NS Perm 07 08 G= 18.0 G= 20.0 G= 22.0 G= G= 13.0 G= 20.0 G= G= iming Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 113.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj, flow rate 128 360 294 472 294 294 461 ane group cap. 234 566 26i 631 336 329 620 /c ratio 0.55 0.64 i.13 0.75 0.88 0.89 0.74 reen ratio 0.16 0.19 0.18 0.4 i 0.18 0.12 0.33 nif. delay d1 43.7 41.8 46.5 28.6 45.3 49.3 33.8 elay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 9.2 5.5 77.9 8.3 32.7 38.3 8.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 52.9 47.3 324.4 36.9 78.0 87.6 42.1 ane group LOS D D F D E F D pprch. delay 48.8 147.2 78.0 59.8 pproach LOS D F E E_ Intersec. delay 88.9 Intersection LOS . F ► NCS2000� Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved � Version 4.Ib file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�i.ocal%20Settings\Temp�s2k 12D... 10/31/2002 Short Report � Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst JW Intersection Broadway & California gency or Co. Burlingame, CA re« Type All other areas Date Performed 10/4/02 urisdiction ime Period AM - Background + Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 f 0 1 2 0 2 i 0 Lane group L TR L T L T L TR olume v h 250 450 25 165 193 30 375. 390 445 10 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0. 90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl Thru & RT 04 SB Onl NS Perm 07 08 G= 20.0 G= 16.0 G= 36.0 G= G= 18.0 G= 20.0 G= G= iming Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 130.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 278 528 183 214 33 417 433 505 Lane group cap. 226 809 181 668 82 555 396 612 /c ratio i.23 0.65 i.01 0.32 0.40 0.75 1.09 0.83 � reen ratio 0.15 0.28 0.12 0.43 0. i5 0.15 0. i4 0.32 Unif. delay di 55.0 41.5 57.0 24.4 49.6 52.6 56.0 40.6 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 53.1 4.2 144.8 1.3 14.6 9.6 10.7 13.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i.000 i.000 1.000 i.000 ontrol delay 508.1 45.6 01.8 25.7 64.2 62.2 66.7 53.9 ane group LOS F D F C E E F D pprch. delay 205.1 106.9 62.4 152.1 pproach LOS F F E F Intersec. delay 146.1 Intersection LOS F � HCS2000� Copyright � 2000 Universiry of Florida, All Rights Rexrved Vcrsion 4.1b file://C:�I3ocuments%20and%20Settings�,Administrator�Loca1%20Settings\Temp\s2k 12E... 10/31 /2002 Short Report • Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst ... JW Intersection Broadway & California gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All other areas ate Performed 10/7/02 urisdiction ime Period PM -Background + Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 1 D 0 1 0 2 1 0 ane group L TR L T T L TR olume v h 115 295 30 265 426 265 265 405 10 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost time � 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 i2.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl Thru & RT 04 SB Onl NS Perm 07 08 G= 18.0 G= 20.0 G= 22.0 G=. G= 13.0 G= 20.0 G= G= iming Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= uration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 113.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 128 361 294 473 294 294 461 ane group cap. 234 566 261 631 336 329 620 /c ratio 0.55 0.64 1.13 0.75 0.88 0.89 0.74 reen ratio 0.16 0.19 0.18 0.41 0.18 0.12 0.33 Unif. delay d1 43.7 41.8 46.5 28.6 45.3 49.3 33.8 elay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 9.2 5.6 77.9 8.4 32.7 38.3 8.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 52.9 47.4 324.4 37.0 78.0 87.6 42.1 ane group LOS D D F D E F D pprch. delay 48.8 147.1 78.0 59.8 pproach LOS D F E E Int�rsec. delay 88.9 Intersection LOS F HCS2000� Copyright 0 2000 Univcrsity o[ Florida, All Rights Rcserved Version 4.1b file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�I.oca1°1o20Settings\Temp\s2k 12E... 10/31/2002 Short Report - _ age 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite information alyst JW Intersection Broadway & California gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All other areas �ate Performed 10/8/02 urisdiction ime Period AM - Cumulative + Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 2 i 0 Lane group L TR L T L T L TR olume v h 250 466 25 165 201 30 375 390 445 10 % Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/h r Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl Thru & RT 04 SB Onl NS Perm 07 08 G= 20.0 G= 16.0 G= 36.0 G= 0.0 G= 18.0 G= 20.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 iming Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= 0 Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = i.00 cle Len th C= 130.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 278 546 183 223 33 417 433 505 Lane group cap. 226 809 181 668 82 555 396 612 /c ratio 1.23 0.67 1.01 0.33 0.40 OJ5 1.09 0.83 reen ratio 0.15 0.28 0.12 0.43 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.32 Unif. delay d1 55.0 41.8 57.0 24.6 49.6 52.6 56.0 40.6 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 53.1 4.6 144.8 1.3 14.6 9.6 10.7 13.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 508. i 46.4 01.8 25.9 64.2 62.2 66.7 53.9 � ane group LOS F D F C E E F D pprch. delay 202. i 105.2 62.4 i52.1 pproach LOS F F E F Intersec. delay i45.2 Intersection LOS F HCS2000� CopyriBht m 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reservcd Version 4.1b file://C:\Documents%20and%20 SettingsW dministrator\Local%20Settings\Temp�s2k 130... 10/31/2002 Short Report � - Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT enerai Information ite Information alyst JW intersection Broadway & California gency or Co. Burlingame, CA •�• rea Type Ail otherareas Date Performed 10/7/02 urisdiction ime Period PM -Cumulative + Project alysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 i 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 Lane group L TR L T T L TR olume v h 115 311 30 265 434 265 265 405 10 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A P P P P P P P P P P tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen � 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 � 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 Lane Width i2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl WB Onl Thru & RT 04 SB Onl NS Perm 07 08 G= 18.0 G= 20.0 G= 22.0 G= G= 13.0 G= 20.0 G= G= iming Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= 4 Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 113.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 128 379 294 482 294 294 461 Lane group cap. 234 566 261 631 336 329 620 /c ratio 0.55 0.67 1.13 0.76 0.88 0.89 0.74 reen ratio 0.16 0.19 0.18 0.41 0.18 0.12 0.33 Unif. delay di 43.7 42.1 46.5 28.8 45.3 49.3 33.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 9.2 6.4 77.9 9.0 32.7 38.3 8.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 52.9 48.5 324.4 37.9 78.0 87.6 42.1 ane group LOS D D F D E F D pprch. delay 49.6 146.4 78.0 59.8 pproach LOS D F E E Intersec. delay; 88.7 Intersection LOS F HCS2000� Cop)'right � 2000 University ot Florida, All Rig6ts Reserved Version 4.1b file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�L.oca1%20Settings\Temp\s2k 1318... 10/31 /2002 Short Report • Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst JW Intersection Cadillac/Rollins . gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All otherareas Date Performed 10/15/02 urisdiction ime Period AM- Exist alysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT um. of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group LTR L T LT L TR - olume v h 28 40 4 109 47 2 i70 628 121 3 % Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 � Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl EB Onl 03 04 NS Perm SB Onl 07 08 G= J0.0 G= 10.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 13.0 G= 45.0 G= D.0 G= 0.0 iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Duration ot Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 90.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 79 121 52 i91 698 137 ane group cap.. 141 201 211 274 903 1284 /c ratio 0.56 0.60 0.25 0.70 0.77 0.11 reen ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.50 0.68 nif. delay d1 37.9 38.1 36.6 36.6 18.3 5.0 Delay factor k 0.16 0.19 0.11 0.26 0.32 0.11 Increm. delay d2 4.8 4.8 0.6 7.5 4.1 0.0 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 42.7 42.9 37.1 44.1 22.5 5.1 ane group LOS D D D D C A pprch. delay 42.7 41.2 44.1 79.6 pproach LOS _ D D D B Intersec. delay � 27.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000� Copyright � 2000 Univcrsity of Florida. All Rights Resecvcd Version 4.1b file://C:�Documents%20and°lo20Settings�Administrator�Loca1°lo20Settings\Temp�s2k1326... 10/3.1/2002 Short Report . � - Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral information ite Information alyst JW Intersection Cadillac/Rollins gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type �" All otherareas ate Performed 10/15/02 urisdiction ime Period PM- Exist nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ane group LTR L T LT L TR olume v h 11 28 14 i85 103 4 174 676 302 11 % Hea veh 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 nit E�ension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 i2.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl EB Onl 03 04 NS Perm SB Onl 07 08 G= 13.0 G= 8.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 15.0 G= 42.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 90A Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 59 206 114 197 751 348 Lane group cap. i i0 261 274 315 842 1260 /c ratio 0.54 0.79 0.42 0.63 0.89 0.28 reen ratio 0.09 0.14 0. i4 0.17 0.47 0.67 nif. delay d1 39.2 37.2 35.0 34.9 21.9 6.1 Delay factor k 0. i4 0.34 0.11 0.21 0.42 0.11 Increm. delay d2 4.9 i5.8 1.0 3.7 13.1 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 J.000 ontrol delay 44.2 53.0 36.0 38.6 35.0- 6.2 ane group LOS D D D D C A pprch. delay 44.2 46.9 38.6 25.9 pproach LOS D D D C Intersec. delay �� 32.1 Intersection LOS C NCS2P00� Copyright � 2000 Universiry of Florida, All Rights Resecvcd Version 4.1b file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�L.oca1°1o20Settings\Temp�s2k 1330... 10/31/2002 Short Report _ . ' Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information alyst •�• JW Intersection Cadillac/Rollins gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All otherareas Date Performed 10/3/02 urisdiction ime Period AM- Background . nalysis Year 02-8i9 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT um. of Lanes 0 i 0 i 1 0 0 1 0 i i 0 Lane group LTR L T LT L TR olume v h 28 40 4 109 47 2 170 632 121 3 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl EB Onl 03 04 NS Perm SB Onl 07 08 G= 10.0 G= 10.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 13.0 G= 45.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 iming y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = J.00 cle Len th C= 90.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 79 121 52 191 702 137 ane group cap. 141 201 211 274 903 1284 /c ratio 0.56 0.60 0.25 0.70 0.78 0.11 reen ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.50 0.68 nif. delay d1 37.9 38.1 36.6 36.6 18.4 5.0 elay factor k 0.16 0.19 0.11 0.26 0.33 0.11 Increm. delay d2 4.8 4.8 0.6 7.5 4.3 0.0 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 42.7 42.9 37.1 44. i 22.7 5.1 Lane group LOS D D D D C A pprch. delay 42.7 41.2 44.1 19.8 pproach LOS D D D 8 Intersec. delay � 27.7 Intersection LOS C HCS2000� Copyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Versioo 4.1b file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�L,oca1%20Settings\Temp�s2k 133... 10/31/2002 Short Report . " . Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral information ite Information nalyst JW Intersection Cadillac/Rollins ... gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All otherareas Date Performed 10/3/02 urisdiction ime Period PM- Background nalysis Year 02-Si9 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 i i 0 Lane group LTR L T LT L TR olume v h 11 28 14 185 103 4 174 681 302 11 % Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 � 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 i2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl EB Onl 03 04 NS Perm SB Onl 07 08 G= 13.0 G= 8.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 15.0 G= 42.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 iming Y= 3. Y= 3 Y= D Y= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 90.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela , and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 59 206 114 i97 757 348 Lane group cap. 110 261 274 315 842 1260 /c ratio 0.54 0.79 0.42 0.63 0.90 0.28 reen ratio 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.47 0.67 nif. delay d1 39.2 37.2 35.0 34.9 22.1 6. i Delay factor k 0.14 0.34 0.11 0.21 0.42 0.11 Increm. delay d2 4.9 15.8 i.0 3.7 14.1 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 44.2 53.0 36.0 38.6 36.2 6.2 ane group LOS D D D D D A pprch. delay 44.2 46.9 , 38.6 26.8 pproach LOS D- , D D C Intersec. delay 32.6. ` Intersection LOS C HCS2000� Copyright m 2000 University otFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1b file:l/C:\Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�I.oca1%20Settings\Temp�s2k 1344... 10/31/2002 Short Report . Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information alyst JW - Intersection Cadillac/Rollins gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All other areas ate Performed 10/3/02 urisdiction ime Period AM- Background +Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT um. of Lanes 0 1 0 1 i 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ane group LTR L T LT L TR olume v h 28 40 4 109 47 2 170 632 121 3 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A tartu lost time 2.0. 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl EB Onl 03 04 NS Perm SB Onl 07 08 G= 10.0 G= 10.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 13.0 G= 45.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Y= 3 Y= 3. Y= 0 Y= uration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 90.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 79 i21 52 191 702 137 ane group cap. 141 � 201 211 274 903 1284 /c ratio 0.56 0.60 0.25 0.70 0.78 0.11 reen ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.50 0.68 nif. delay d1 � 37.9 38.1 36.6 36.6 �8.4 5.0 elay factor k 0. i6 0. i9 0.11 0.26 0.33 0. i i Increm. delay d2 4.8 4.8 0.6 7.5 4.3 0.0 PF factor 1.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 42.7 42.9 37.1 44.1 22.7 5.1 ane group LOS D D D D C A prch. delay 42J 41.2 44.1 19.8 pproach LOS D -, D D B Intersec. delay 27.7 �� Intersection LOS C HCS2000� ' Copyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1b file://C:�Documents%20and°1o20SettingsW dministrator�Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k 1350... 10/31/2002 Short Report� - Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information alyst JW Intersection Cadillac/Rollins gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All otherareas ate Performed i0/3/02 urisdiction ime Period PM- Background + Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin in ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ane group LTR L T LT L TR olume v h J 1 28 14 185 103 4 174 681 305 11 % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A tartu (ost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl EB Onl 03 04 NS Perm SB Onl 07 08 G= i3.0 G= 8.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 15.0 G= 42.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 90.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 59 206 114 197 757 351 Lane group cap. 110 261 274 315 842 i260 /c ratio 0.54 0.79 0.42 0.63 0.90 0.28 reen ratio 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.47 0.67 nif. delay d1 39.2 37.2 35.0 34.9 22.1 6.1 Delay factor k 0.14 0.34 0.11 0.21 0.42 0.11 Increm. delay d2 4.9 15.8 1.0 3.7 14.1 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 44.2 53.0 36.0 38.6 36.2 6.3 ane group LOS D D D D D A prch. delay 44.2 46.9 38.6 26.7 pproach LOS D D D C Intersec. delay 32.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000� Copyri8ht � 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Rcsccved Vcrsion 4.1b file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�Loca1%20Settinas\Temp�.s2k 135... 10/3-1/2002 Short ReporE � Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information nalyst JW Intersection_ Cadillac/Rollins gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All other areas �ate Performed 10/8/02 urisdiction ime Period AM- Cumulative + Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 1 0 i 1 0 0 1 0 1 i 0 Lane group LTR L T LT L TR olume v h 28 40 4 119 47 2 170 632 121 3 % Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 • 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl EB Onl 03 04 NS Perm SB Onl 07 08 G= 10.0 G= 10.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 13.0 G= 45.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 90.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 79 132 52 191 702 137 Lane group cap. 141 201 211 274 903 1284 /c ratio 0.56 0.66 0.25 0.70. 0.78 0.11 reen ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.50 0.68 Unif. delay di 37.9 38.4 36.6 36.6 18.4 5.0 Delay factor k 0.16 0.23 0. i 1 0.26 0.33 0.11 Increm. delay d2 4.8 7.5 0.6 7.5 4.3 0.0 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 42.7 45.8 37.1 44.1 22.7 5.1 Lane group LOS D D D D C A pprch. delay 42.7 43.4 44.1 19.8 pproach LOS D D_ D B Intersec. delay 28.1 � Intersection LOS C XCS2000�'� Copyright 0 Z000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1b file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�Loca1 �o20Settings\Temp\s2k 1364... 10/31/2002 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ite Information alyst ` .JW Intersection Cadillac/Rollins gency or Co. Burlingame, CA rea Type All otherareas ate Performed 10/8/02 urisdiction ime Period PM- Cumulative + Project nalysis Year 02-819 Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT um. of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 i 0 Lane group LTR L T LT L TR olume v h 11 28 14 185 103 4 174 681 305 1 i % Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0. 90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ctuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival t e 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit E�ension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedBike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 i2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/h r Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl EB Onl 03 04 NS Perm SB Onl 07 08 G= 13.0 G= 8.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 15.0 G= 42.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 iming Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Y=.3 Y= 3 Y= 0 Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 1.00 cle Len th C= 90.0 Lane Grou Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj. flow rate 59 206 114 197 757 351 Lane group cap. 110 261 274 315 842 1260 /c ratio 0.54 0.79 0.42 0.63 0.90 0.28 reen ratio 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.47 0.67 nif. delay d1 39.2 37.2 35.0 34.9 22.1 6.1 Delay factor k 0.14 0.34 0.11 0.2J 0.42 0.1 f Increm. delay d2 4.9 15.8 1.0 3.7 14.1 0.1 PF factor i.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 44.2 53.0 36.0 38.6 36.2 6.3 ane group LOS D D D D D A prch. delay 44.2 46.9 38.6 26.7 pproach LOS D D - D C Intersec. delay 32.6 Intersection LOS C NCS2000� Copyright m 2000 Univcrsity of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1b � file://C:�Documents%20and%20Settings�Administrator�L,oca1%20Settings\Temp�s2k136... 10/31/2002 ' i , ^ � _ APPENDIX B Parking and Traffic Surveys 10/13/2002 21:17 4153319522 , REED . Santa� Clara Speedri�g Parfcinq and Trip Generation Summary i 1 � , Thursday� Oct 10, 2002 TOTAL Time IN OUT PARKED 3:00- PM -- -- 14 s:oaa:�s o � �s 3:15-3:30 0 0 13 3;3Q-3:45 2 0 15 3:45-4:00 0 0 15 4;00-4:15 1 1 1 S 4:15-4:30 1 3 13 4:30-4:45 1 1 13 4:45-S:Oa 2 1 14 5:00-5:15 3 1 �18 5:15-5:30 2 8 12 5:30-5:45 1 1 12 5:45-6:00 2 0 14 8:00-6:15 1 0 15 6:15-6:30 0 1 14 6:30-6:45 3 0 17 6:45-7�00 1 2 16 7:00-7:15 3 0 18 7:15-7:30 5 1 23 �:sa7:4s � 2 zz 7:45-8:00 3 1 24 8:00-8:15 2 3 23 8:15-8:30 2 4 21 8:30-8:45 1 0 22 8:45-9�00 5 1 28 9:04-9:15 1 3 24 9:15-9:30 2 4 ?2 8:30 PM •- -- 22 PAGE -01 . 10/07/2002 13:24 4153319522 � ; Santa Cla�a Speedring REED PAC� Parking and THp Generation Summary Ftiday - october 4�02 TOTAL Time IN OUT PARKED 3:00- PM -- -- 20 3:00-3:15 3:15-3:30 3:30-3:45 3:,5-4:00 4:00-4:1 S 4:15-4:30 4�3Q-4:45 4��5-S:00 5:00-5:15 5:15-5:30 5:30-5:45 5:45-8:00 6:00-8:15 6:15-8:30 6:30-8�45 6'45-7:00 7:00-7:15 7:15-7:30 7:30-7:45 7:45-8:00 8:00-8:15 8�15-8;30 8:30-8:45 8:45-9:00 9:00 PM 6 Saturday - October 6/02 TOTAL Time IN OUT PARKED 11:00 AM -- — 13 11:00-11:15 0 0 13 11:15-11:30 1 0 14 11:30-11:45 0 0 14 11:45-12:00 0 0 14 12:00-12:15 1 0 15 12:15-12:30 2 2 15 12:3a-12:45 2 5 12 12:45-1:00 1 1 12 1:OU-1:15 3 0 15 1:15-1:30 2 0 17 1:30-1:45 5 3 19 1:45-2:00 1 3 17 2:00-2:15 5 2 20 2:15-2:30 S 1 24 2:30-2:45 4 2 26 2:45-3:00 2 0 28 3:00-3�15 2 0 30 3:15-3:30 1 8 23 3:30-3:45 4 3 2d 3:45-4:00 1 0 25 4:00-4:1 S 0 2 23 4:15-4:30 0 2 21 4:30-4:45 0 2 19 4:�5-5:00 0 0 19 5:�0-5:15 1 0 20 5:15-5:30 2 0 22 5:30-5:45 0 4 18 5:45-8:00 0 0 18 6:00•6:15 1 1 18 6:15-6:30 0 2 19 6:30-6:45 z 1 17 6:45-7;00 8 5 20 7:00-7:15 2 1 21 7:15-7:30 0 0 21 7:30-7:45 1 3 19 7:45-9:00 1 1 19 8:00-8:15 0 1 18 8:15-8:30 0 2 16 8:30-8:45 1 3 14 8:�5-9:00 1 1 14 9�00 PM 14 a '� ; , J �; � - 'I'� � _ 3 � 0 � w 0 � z � � X w � U N r � � a' i E / o o � o} /m 00 ow � F- nF- 20 %a / hm � N /N V O � zw c� ¢ zo 3i- �� oa DEP, COP �1; , � � ��#�..�t� :�� i;._ ' .�i ��, �t� ..�� ; � �, ; :� � a ' . �:Ii�LL,. _.. .a �� MONUMENT WELL � n�e�cNmaRr: "CONSiRUCT10N HOURS" WEEKDAYS: B:00 A.M. - 7:00 P.M. SATURDAYS: 9:00 A.M. - 6:00 P.M. SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS: NO WORK ALL041ED (SEE CITY OF BURLIGAME MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 13.04.100 F(kt DETAILS.) CONSTRUCTION HOURS IN iHE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE iIMITED TO WEEKDAYS AND NON-CITY HOLIDAYS BETWEEN 8: A.M. AND 5:00 P.M. ABBpEV1ATIONS AC ASPHALT CONCRETE B.F.P. BACK PLOW PREVENTION DENCE BLOG BUILDING DWY DRIVEWAY (E) EXISTING FF FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION HCR HAN�ICAP RAMP IRR IRRIGAl10N LF LiNEAR FEE7 LS LANDSCAPE (N) NEW S.A.D. SEE ARCHITECiURAL DRAWING SF SOUARE FEET S.L.D. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAN1NG S.P.D. SEE PWM8ING �RANING M' TOP OF WALL TG TOP OF GRAiE �'�1 WAiER METER W� WATER LINE GENERAL LEGEND ---- PROPERTY LWE — — — EASEMENT LINE ' � - LEASE LWE � FIRE HYDRANT � �--�-- EX WATER LINE � '^ -- EX STORM DRAIN �----�ss ----- EX SAMTARY SEWER DEMOLITION LEGEt+� �1 EXISTING TO REMAW ❑2 EXISTED TO BE fic�dO1,�ED � EXISTING TO BE REtOCATED � REMOVE TREE � EXISTING TO BE REMOVED NOTES: t. LOCATIONS OF UT1L;T(ES AND Ui1LITY CONNECTIONS 70 iHE OUILDING ARE BASE.�'. Qt�i FIELD OBSERVATIONS OF S:.3R�ACE IMPROVEMENTS AND Af2E ASSUMED. OWNER WFORMAlIOh: FRANK EDWARDS (.'fkdPANY, INC 1565 ADRIAN ROAG BURLINGAME, CA 94a1Q 650-692-2347 OO BKF Enaineers � � 0 � rn � ¢ o c� o z F� m w � i E �O N� ��s 0 ��0�3 �n�w�3 N1n��3 '}" � � � w z t�tt ¢ ` J T d � � � O � � � N y � . w I w z � � `�■, w O Zw H Q � JZ � � Z`` 0 o } � � � � J � 0 aVw �w� �p a Z � Q Q � aoo � O � � rLLZ 0 U t7 W � Za c� — z �c � � m X � W � r � U �.� � �� i Y�i � r � � ',... '. ...; . ' S' 1.: 4� _!� � �;�;�j. . .- � , i � GRAPHIC SCALE i � � �� 30 0 3c� 60 Z Y m � `° M � i � � � I�o : N N � �� O � I a IdIN m o a, 3 0 � z � m Q a o i c v� o c` a Drawing Number: a � t.�ddJ � '] oF 3 i � e e ._ � � �022 W� �.66� ,� .� P 4 �7 ��,��. � _ � s � �'�"'� „ [�� t � �.�,..,� � I [�]� [�]I [3�]I [�]I [�] [ 7 . � �,�m-.� � � , . "-� �� z��w7�[�el [�]� n i li} �t,. � ...`.: �'�� '...' � � � �.: [nl [�e7�[�s7�[pl�L2i7�[nl�[ 7 [ 1 ; j �' � �s Ba7 .� � (N)STRIPING '�B�I�� o� �»7Ip271�'S�I�14�I� �I 960 DAVID ROAD STANDARD SPACES 27 [�7I �4)I �s7I �fi�I ��I 9 I I �� E ELECiRiCAL 9� X 20' (TYPICAL) PARCEL MAP MILLSDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK � �I [ � ) 9.o'(rm) � (N)STRIPING COMPACT TOWEft �� (se] L�a1 (32 M 701 U (N)DRIVEWAY � SPACES S� X 17' � Ir/ � Lai] [ 1 �7 [�1 [ss] t�] [ 3� TIPICAL g o'(�) ��y7 [] 6� � LANDS OF FRHNK EDWARDS CO INC IMPROVEMENTS � � ��5g7 [57] [ 1 I I I I I (DN. 2013 066231) �' � �� [51) �53] �� I I I 'I I �. �� 'p_ 1 8/.0'lT(P) ,�1 � C5i7 `,. I- I I . 1 . ? .� APN:025-271-090 -� .�v` F�'� H) L�SI L�� Lk]I L�� I�) L) �� I � . �.��'.� � 40I C41� L4T� I41I L I � I _. E � t�� [m �� [�� ` � ' � -v � � ;� �; �., =�� 20s0'(n?) � ; I� ` ' S2 STANDARD SPACES \�t 4 �i� � � � ��. ( , . LEASE�� 9' X 20' TYPICAL v �� .� ._ __, ' , , a� - _ . , ` .� �� ' zao (Tav) � _ �: �� . . LINE � J , �� i �� u, ,,, .y �� TOW-AWAY AND NO DUMPING SIGNS 3 �. � � E s '� � �i7.o'(1'(P� ' S = ° n+ � m n� A o EVERY 100 ALONG INSIDE FENCE 3.0 � ' i � i ; . � A A � � � � � t , , -izo 0 (N)DRIVEWAY � � � 18 COMPACT SPACES � � n� �� ( ; � ; ; � _ ? � � � � �� IMPROVEMENTS �'� � 8' X t�' (TYPICAL) �.�.-n„ � � E �y�,X,.�� :. t.:y ., ; s � - .. . no n .: � . . . , s t �� , ; ; i ? .ii P . � 3_._.-----' ; - 46.2 � �. �•-- i , . , : , . t 3 ��. ^ . , i1 j.r , � , : _ , � ? � � � ' � � E E , ��_� � �- � - ,� --- Y ` ; e i i . �� } . t_� . - � i ' � � .. ...� 3/4 IROR ' + . t - i`�' � _ . ..- � � _•.- �- ° ; i � ' ' `.,�,yir-+��. '� '" � � - - LEASE PIPEWITN ' � � i .y` -� �"'y�� EXTEND ROOF -� �� '� � � -� � LINE TACK& � '� DRAIN TO l5 -- .._-� � - � �--- TAGW ( , �� .._ _ _ � � . F_ , - .. MONUMEN�s � -� - s.' ... � � � � _` , � -- s RE 7328 . � �� -- . �-'� . ._ � -• �x 64� LF � • . � ' � -- ; _ , n x ; � -_ �" �2 " ;�--- 'r [ ] .. .. E� �. . �. ' � _ � 2.a � � _ . , , ` 't . .. . . � (N)48" ALL � z ��' �� WEATHER 1� �� ... (N)SEWER DRAIN (N)TRASH WALKWAY � � � � 1 � BY OTHERS S.A.D. COMPACTOR N1TH I '= .� o � ,. �� 7 CONCREIE PAD Q N o �� h)p�R��WA� � , �`�%-� _ � (N)TRENCH DRAIN 3 � � IMPROVEMENTS 3� . S � J. .. - _ � Q o� �� s yf� ��.� � � 1 � LOADING DOCK �.� N ��. ' � `� � �� GRADING DETAIL ' � � �ti �ti . t : ; , � �., J I � z, a `�� , � e� �, � � LAN S OF FRANK EDWARDS INC Q Q 6 '� `�, ' _ � /ti (N)TRUCK (DN. 2013-066231) � b ! � ` s E � �r` � py _a ? LOADING npN� 025-271-070 Q �`� � � __.. � � ��e] / � DOCK � z ��'. �� .d - �"t� �vb� � (N)RETAINING WALL � � � -'� � g �� ,. � BY OTHERS z2o.o' ��; � � � ,�' � r • 3,z� v fi = . �� . � x z .� t �_. ,r` � � �, �, - �`�, iv ; ,�,� � �'a�, r� , �,: . . � _ `,- � o � a rk �3 �_� i � - � � v: . � '�, / A .` 4: �, � �� :� �� _ -._...._...._*' [�s� � -� .; : �, , .: ,..��; a5-�C7 , . , 5 �;3 � - ` - o � g � �S� � �...� 1541 A�RIAN ROAD s.a' 1 3'^! f . . 5 S [�7r ,,.� �r� ,..$)F7� 4 F;_�;.t; .%��i � � �F �� ''� (N)WHEEL STOP(T1P) �' '�S.m' � FOUR 4 CUSTOMER . B� '� FF 101.71 �J,��„ PICKUP PA.RKING STALLS . _ - � �G� � ) �� [ ], re: ,�'�° �t7 �fim :�, s � .. .'_11v � � Lios}-� �� (�� ,� [�1/ `� (N)LS S.L.D. OO BKF Engineers � � (N)FENCE � � � � � � ■ 64 LF �-- -- . ,� _.." _ � � TE INTO ..- (N)ALL,45�Ski�&-WJcLKWAY~ ` �o .,�. � , _��._... _ :_ . Q (E)SD -� ' . .. - 4 00� Z � n � INV 97.24 '-- .. . 4 � ___.__-- � . ` � � � ' - � � �- w � � � _- _ a � � � -- •,<; __ .... �0013 . .. �a ,a i .. ooQ�� ..._ .._ ..z __.._... .. a v �- � r � _� . . . .. �. _...___ . , o v ..._._. � � � 50.00 x x--_""��x t00.5 v �n � o� 3 . .. _ .-. _ ��.x "-�- a . a N v�i ¢ �. 3 _ .. p,�% - ----0`--�_ � �99.88 '� � "�"- . � � �- "�' 700 36 v . � di . . � �}� � .. �� - $�.�� _�_.-_'_._. K�-ry - G pa" 2 a��„cti -`�. +� � ' - ' --__ _ a Q. v . . ' �.._ G ' ' ' . p a Y � a. -� �I..v a' � 2 _ .. �_._._- . a .v v . . ' a °" � Q o� �� v 53 0 030 a4. . ° � . a � a ' ° O.�R a � � . � \ 100:79 \ 4.00' � �- �.,� � � a ae� - � ��.� {N)LS S L.D., . � _ � ' � m �. � 1.0°i v a ° - � � ` (N}1RANSFORMER � d' a t OX � � r:_ °� -"'� '-�.- _` iQ� ' O ��..� - 4- .,,,.. � 50; , � � PAD � Y . . �. _.. _ _.. _- � 11� 104:00 �[99.90]� L---'-- ;,,i};, 23 LF J{[ ` iFtASH j 0 100A5] " 5-0.030 TW 104 00 ��' TRUCK � j o ACCESS y - � OtSTLINE h � �NV 97.63 � v . �� . `�k' � - �' � . o . v a �98.39) "�' - tu 3.t W x � "� . � � � TG 98 87 % :. 'z�60' �(97J7 ) � - z °iNv sa�� a � (sz�i) �I■ � 1 ioo os "° ` z --L � _ � � o �. v � � �� 11.00� ��, W �� a i � g100 O6 � 35:00' :�98.30) � I � O � .,. ,: - 4.9%. "�"- � � - -- 0 4 =. . . o -..n v , __ � (97J1) _'-� - "_.-_. ...- �- �� .,.. � K �� - � a �' . � 98.39 ' (97.71) FF 101.71 � :x � �� A� .a � � � --- ,j � � . a rri ioaoo` � 2�so' (9z�i) �ez�i) z [ioo.o�]. " , oa . '° ,� t'. � a 1 i�' � � � °a a.�z � ��, �it.00, v� � �\ 13.SA�� 37.41' �, 9H.37) §tix I� � � I ' � � LOADING DOCK � '.� `� �� -�(97.71)'��97.71)� LIMITS S.A.D. Z t \ / ;,\ TW T04.00 � I � " � �`�� (N)LS S.L.D. � Q � O ��`�`-^e �� --14.00� , Y� ,� - � � / `` � ,, _._.� ... ��;� :�� . , __ , ocoa Z t LOA�4N€� DOGK GRADING DETAIL Q 7 �y C1.00 SCAtE: 1 =10 L Q Q W Q O VJ r O � %��°n � ,,' [no� LEASE , i� � � l / . -A;�I��., ta�] z FORK LIFT . 2 N)ADA I �108� � �. LWE � .3 /� J ` � (N)LS S.LD. � � -o ¢ J a w � � N � � w � 0 V �a z� w o / � °o �m �o ow o r- �o m�a � r� 0 n %m ^ I O N �O Y O w Q .. zw � c� a zo 3 F- �� o� �"� a. 1.0 AREA 3.0 SIGN �� . (N)�URB :� k � � GRADING � � ,� �iu; OPENW¢ 18 �� (N)FORK LIFT DRIVE DETAIL pw] �P' sQ, 24 STANDARD SPACES WiDE 50' OFP �� . j� �p.o' AIS�E WITH ROLL UP �� "� 9' X 18' (Tl'PICA�) CENTERED{TYP) j r'� ` , DOOR AND ,�-�-- 76. ' I -:; Opi47 ' ��3 � 8' � t j - . CUSTOMER LOADING �� i � � - �- (N)ADA �2 :` �� ZONE S.A.D. (E)WATER � "� � � � � �� SIGN 3.0 �_ -;� � D 1 _ .'� (N)LS S.L.D. CONNEGTION � � �[11°� � � �� --� (N)ENTRANCE �B6 ( 0 �92� ( CUSTOMER LOADING ' � b _ _ Wlhl LEVEL - 4�0 [im7 ` [+�sl PASSWG LANE � ' � ' � (N)RAMP WITH LANDING a5.a`�J� ; «'� [s�] , �4�0" �-�} � -�: e �. �, � _ _ _ � .a'(Ti'P) d � - � 86 - ,1 LEVEL LANDINGS � � ��.�Q � � � = �10°� N FENCE -, ��. . � � t�\- ( ) ' � i�I` �� 225 � asl� � Le's7 2.�' [ne� 20 LF , ;�Y ��.��.a� �.��.�-��i.��.�� 1�.��v��.��:s�i>��..�.��.� �aa7 � � l �s.e' � � � � ��: � , i : d; '..` � , � - (N�l.� S.L.D. ; �.{ea}"�. �T�'� s.n"r�) � � iee5�. [nqT m�e.o(Tva) , � 142' t ' �� v} - .�i �.., � � �- � � � � �9 [��i� (N)L6 �.L.�. � ,, t . � � � � _ - , �' R�20 00� 1 ♦ . � - ,��..�. .. ..�.. � ' '.:.�._'...' �� ..�,+� a J � " �� s _ � � � _. o� � , . .:_ ... ��v... �. .....� - - - , - _" `� - , - - � _ L 30 03' - � - Yv � -�._.._ �, .. ; . _ .� ._ �. ....._ -�- . ,Q. . ___. . e .�� G w - ,. --- �. .�. _'m`"= -_ "a_m"^ . . m�. ,� � � . - .,� b .4-__ - on� . -> .� . �. _ �, . _ __ +' 4=86°02'03� � � � + � � - �� 3� �-0.�8, .._ �>� -- a;1 -- - sc�- - s� �-- su - s� � �N)SIGNc� - ->^ - � s�; - - e;�+ �__ ,w ._�N�LS S.LD. __ ;:., - - � � � 6 COMPACT 5 STANDARD 4"IRON PIPE WITH� � � ADRIAN ROAD SPACES 8' X 20' SPACES 9' X 20' � (N)DftIVEWAY . (N)DRIVEWAY TACK &'TAG IN � 3.D 3.0 MONUMENTWELL IMPROVEMENTS 3� (TYPICAL) (T1P�CAL) IMPROVEMENTS 5?EBENCHMARX GRADING LEGEND GENERAL LEGEND N� - PARKING 7.g2 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVAiION -"- PROPERTY LINE 1. GRADING PERMIT, IF REQUIRED, WILL ' X BE OBTAINED FROM THE ON SITE 50 X��•B� CONFORM TO EXISTING � CONCRETE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. OFF SI7E 70 SPOT ELEVA170N � 2, CARTS WILL NOT LEAVE THE SITE STRIPING �7�82) ASSUMED SPOT ELEVATION AND WILL NOT BE USED IN THE STREET* 14 X � PARKING BLOCK PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. TOTAL 120 '�� EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 3. iYPICAL COMPACT PARKING STALLS a WALL WILL HAVE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS OF *NOT WCLUDE�J IN TOTAL. p_`3� TJ FIRE HYDRANT 8' X 17'. TYPICAL STANDARD PROPOSED GRADE PARKING STALLS WILL IiAVE = TRENCH DRAIN MINIMUM DIMENSIONS OF 9� X 18�. STORM DRAIN (6") � STORM DRAIN CLEAN OUT = 6"' VERT7CAL CURB [7] PARKING STALL NUMBER ----- f ---�--- EX WATER LINE -- ss - EX STORM DRAW . ---- �a ------ EX SANITARY SEWER �•{ ��••� TRAVEL PATH � � � � i t (N)LS S. ; � , ; � J LEVEL` LANDING iRUNCAiED DOMES � FORK LIFT lL�EA GRADiNG DETAIL ci.00 sc�tE: �"=1ar \� GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 30 60 W � Q � Z J 0' � m L� O r H U ! � � F u � - C � � 0 C u f' t L � z - °° o � E' o = o � r+ cn � � e i � Q � m � o d � � �,;oZ u O O N O a p ` o cn o o` a Drawing Number. � ��a�� oF� o �_ �s��(��'il� . , �1 , , ., � � �� ;� i � ...... .. ... _. . ._.. ....... _... ..... .. . .._._ ._.. ...... ._... r— ^ . .. ... ..... .. ..'. ..... .... � .... . _.}... . � _Wau( ta' u u u� ; � � . 1 U � vnRiEs i '�1�1V.4Y APPRO��H ," _.. ... ___.. I . . _._ (.. . � CUPB i ER OR � 0 n � .•' ��N. OH n5 H C Fr Si1NG F EC (3YSi�E C iv DH ECiED 9Y � , .� . F.CI,iY .� . �,' I .C...� .: � H io ..0' (ttP ) II�1.5' 10�2.9' �� SAx' T, R�A 0 REP G_ t' w�E (- '.) FULL DEPiH (�w.) .= . AV:ryG xNEN RfPUCING CUR9/GU-1ER OR DftivEwAY nPPROACh. � 7RI�/=Wav `NTTACHED� � PvaN vi�w n rs. ��. 9A(N OF. . s ocwn x \ . --- ..... uN. _.— aa�—...I �� w_� a.c. WiUE M OEEP GROOVE R�MOV�/REVLAGE ��. co�o on•� . , , �� . . . . . . . .- i I . . \ 1 � s' 'r�e--- I -:- � " . . � '� i ��. � T. � rcN �. Es�� _ T _ ��-� � 6" �n�v - SO 95� RELnPE�RfCMPA��..N'�C�� \� �- �Ec N�� '� ��. SEC_ICN A—r1 i '��. N Ts. �� .,_ �,c s,e«A,n s:,._i a� ��.h ,.i;�_ Fi�ri-o.-H>r �I ! . _ . � . � , � . �. � _,r�� r __ =_ ��/ �`- - i - �;.1 � DRI�Eu'.:. �`%/ �. >__ �. �. CUFB. .__ ...... .. ......... I, GUiiE4 t' n OR n� . . - 1 MiN OR AS ��. . .. . 2 F�GiE� BY ':-�E _ � P R[9 ED BY 1HE C"t' �' , , - - / � n c. , - � � . - ,, 7 n c � .� . . ....� 2' �I � H ' VAD'H 'APoES ..�' � � I � � '�V^i.;�'R�=.,:q= 4S .. L PLA� V;'_.�N �. N.r. ;. �,�.. ..... .._... ..... __. __. _.._.... SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, CURB AND GUTTER S'� E DEPARTMENT OF Pl/9LIC WORKS Sw-i . . . ;2of3) .. �1 DRIVEWAY DETAIL �—��NTS 80" MIN � DISABLED PARKING SIGN R99C (CA) �PER CA MUTCD 2014. � 2.� REFLECTORIZED SIGNS CONSTRUCTED ]„ OF PORCELAIN -2 ID GALV. ON STEEL. STEEL POST DARK BLUE W/ CAP NTS a pARKI BACKGROUND WITH BEADED, CLASS B � �� WHITE TEXT. CONCRETE z4�� M,N I-�-�T-- MINIMUM � l,��REFER TO FINE $250 ��5" RADIUS LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR SIDEWALK DETAILS. � �2" oin VAN ACCESSIBLE - .66" IDENTIFICATION SIGN: 60" MiN. MEASURED To EACH PARKING SP.4�E PES��RVED FOR THE DISABLED SHALL BOTTOM OF SIGN. BE IDENTIFIED BY A F�RMANENTLY AFFIXED REFLECTORIZED 80" MIN.IF LOCAlED SIGN DISPLAYIN� ��: ;TTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF WIhIIN AN ACCESSIB�E ACCESSIBILIIY THE �'�N SHALL NOT BE SMALLER THAN 70 ROUTE SQ. IN. IN ARFA ANC :iHALL BE CEMERED AT THE INTERIOR END OF THE PARKING SPACE AT A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 80 TO TOP OF WALKWG IN. FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN TO THE PARKING SURFACE SPACE RNISHED GRADE, OR CENTERED ON THE WALL AT THE INTERIOR END OF '�iE PARKING SPACE AT A MINIMUM ACCESSBI.E STALL SIGNAC� HEIGHT OF 60 IN. FROM THE PARKING SPACE FlNISHED GR4DE, GROUND OR S19EWA�K TO BOTTOM OF SIGN. VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES SHALL HAVE A SIGN SHALL ALSO BE POSTED, IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE, AN ADDITIONAL SIGN MOUNTED BELOW AT EACH ENTRANCE TO THE OFF-STREEf PARKING FACILITY, THE DISABLED PARKING SIGN THAT NOT LE55 THAN 17 IN. X 22 IN. IN SIZE WITH LEfTERING STATES "VAN ACCESSIBLE". SEE DETAIL NOT LESS THP.N ; IN. IN HEIGHT, SEE THIS SHEEf, DETAIL 4. THIS SHEET. 5.5" CONCRETE WHEELSTOP, BLUE COLOR. PAVEMENT � � � � #4 REBAR (TYP) �1 WHEEL STOP DETAIL ��C��I �RTS— 1 � CR = 1/2" (T1P) � � ' i�Ci TP p e` �'� a;� �� , CLASS II AB �'£ %� ��;�� , t x s� �� x � ,�Y',z 1/2" X 12" SLIP DOWELS � EXPANSION JOINTS (TYP) ( x � 6" VERTICAL CURB - SCALE: NTS Htirr,� i aria eu;<� C=.G��.v r �� c. �P -�F��RGvED =G�.aL- E hI�JiE : m ACCESSIBILIiY PARKING STALL SIGNS �PER MUTCD 2014, R99C (CA). INSTALL BACK OF WALK � WITH R7-86 (CA) FOR VAN ACCESSIBLE STALLS, SEE SIiE PLAN FOR STALL TYPE 9' MIN. 5� STANDARD 8' VAN � i ACCESSIB�E CHRISTY °FS° VALVE BOX W/ '�FSC" CAST IRON LID �FINISHED GRADE IN LANOSCAPE AREA � J ¢ w 0 V � � w w _ � i 0 V �n za ` o 0 9m 0 `ow o� � l+_I O roa M 0 im ^ I O N jo Y O � z �.i F zo 3� ao K J oa NOTE ALL PVC PIPE TO BE SDR 26. TAPE TRACER WIRE AT 3' INiERVAL W/ FILAMENT TAPE. CLAMP TRACER WIRE TO TOP OF RISER. i —�. — �I ll � 6'X(SIZE OF LINE) PVC RISER W/ CA � PVC 45' BEND iNSTALL AT ENO OF LINE �� , 9��gpJ � `�..�E?E &..�v � , �E � _ � STORM DRAIN CLEAN OUT TOW-AWAY AND ��--�� NO DUMPING SIGNAGE � ACCESSIBLE SIGN DETAIL C7LE�TS �yZ� EEL STOP -FACE OF CURB 3' EQUAL COATS OF 9C LWE PAINT 45' 4 BLUE BORDER o- —0 � �_ 2% MAXIMUM SLOPE � �� NO PARKING EQUAL 14' STANDARD STALL 17' VAN ACCESSIBLE '��. ACCESSIBILITY PARKING - �. STALL PAVEMENT SYMBO� �� (BLUE ON WHITE) �2" HIGH WHITE NOTES. LETTERS MINIMUM. t. MARKING AND LAYOUT TO COMPLY Wihl CBC 118-502. 'L SEE SIiE PLANS, C400-C402 FOR SITE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, CURB HEIGHT AND STALL LAYOUT. �X� ACCESSIBLE STALL DETAIL °VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN R7-8B (CA) PER CA MUTCD 2014 . Y L✓� Prs� �c �� ,> >r � ti Krc, ' r,�T � T�PIi,A:. W }u"9 uar r„ �E c�on � r� =,:_�+ I �� II II~ I �I`-' I I� I i sr �� C'� ,. ., !�� . - � i J � �''BzC 6 f7 .I+ECk r;- � I ) � L n� E� {l �!b �' � i � D L L�� .r�� AS i �0 n!`fJ ,�LT '1�1-' � � �s Nl i.E"� BY ✓AR �S � F � E�- - - �3 ME h C ,' t 1 t .C. �B v .-EF 66AI(r -V ` �,� � , R . ,A1,�T :T P; -�. T� � , P r .f..= i J�A.l. - �� L i . F �- � , � � �' ��----�', � � "t � � ,' i I� ..�4 .;.' ...... ..... ... . / f � � �= �� , / . — , � � P; .� PfE � � �.y�� .' � i� ..-\� IHFU`., t' C Vi? F��". RcAP J'�. -iHr:lJf Pt�:�ri- � ' F`:,F,h'.t �' 'F+'I�I '�C�TE, -'. 3�� <A.L�'_" } F.!1 �2 . L.A E N�'t.'JC lI1F" ThE MA�.1tAUA� I F�_ iS U E =-�F1 T �LF?5. .� OB TF �TF .NS �� E PE t C 7ll�Hih r1 � t�Ei d„il . AN I,, -.�F I 1_P.kFi7 6')'f H! /l ? t t ^uCk C�?5 '-5 l r' D I_u Ic J Ec IN h Atd=F � TN_IP. N� :I�.= 1 2=HIhlG �1LEliAll: IN 7' t UBi�!- R�H � � Wi.1. ,,. T�r .v .h;iCF I i'" CR I� �R�M FA:;F , csRE ..F`iTER t N�DRP.^!T- i Tl` J�G T! �{( CFT T� R lM1IRf II 1<I TF F �O � �+l NN �l Ptt L W F'4. N�A:.i k LL ;= 31 I r.�h! ( hlGi L� IJ 1 T t i f' F 7iE � �1 I l �vA7 M,=J-'kEP �` ��I��D 8 +GNiN �_ --' R i.=:. '.',!;%. d F'a�N � =Hw u1 �, . ��EJ ..� i-F�:= c�:li C.RE�Y .`� � ��E a 1�a.0 � i iS B =�i .� �.. �„� �� n�ar ru� ,�;;.� r r- i r F ecw �rr. . � _. _ _ . .. _ _ �� c, � � rr��a��,�� T, t TY?ICAL FIRE HYURANT � � i .. . .. .... ...... . ... . .. ..... .__ .... Mq�,� 2C�9a I v�-251P ��: [[t e ,; � ,� - I t riK � _ ,. _._ _� ; r�-�aie _�� r i 1___ �X� FIRE HYDRANT DETAIL \ _ / S�AC�� NT� �/ O BKF Engineers � � 0 a m � a � U 0 Z � o w �`°E c�i � � p � � o Y ��0�3 v»w�p 3 NtVJ��3 T t� Y> � �° W �Z Z � Q 4_ J �� p. � � � O > w > � � � N � . W , W 2 � � �� w O W � ¢ � Z ¢ N � O i H Z � O U Q O O � � W � � N � � � Q O � � O T LL W � Q C'J Z J � � m � � � H U � C f L d F � �� L � � � u F � � � z° � m � M r o = o � � v' � i. s � Q -'� m � o � N � = o Z v m — .�' 3 O U N o a� ` o cn o o a ° Drowing Number. a � C�.O� a 3°`3 'n EXISTING GATE TO REMAIN __--- - — _ � �� - � -- - �� - ■ EXISTING FIRE RISER --. � SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. THISISAGENERICLAVOUTSHOWN. COO�INATEVN7HCIVIL. 2 SIGNAGE LOCATIONS ARE FOR REFERCNC.E ONLY AND ARE NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT PACKAGE. 9. PROVIDEAFLUSHCURBCONDIFIONALON6FRONTOFBUILDING,REFERTOCIVIL DRAWINGS. LEGEND � - HEAVY DUTY ASPHAIT. DETECTABLE WARNING �ETECTABLE WARNING SURFACESSHALLCONTRASTVISUALLY WITH ADJACENT WALKING SURFACES EITHER LIGHT-ON-DARK OR DARK-ON-LIGHT. THE MATERIAL USED TO PROVIDECONTRAST SHALL BE AN INTEGRAI PART OF THE SURFACE. (SEC.178-705.7.13) �ETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE YELLOW CONFORMING TO (FS 33538) OF FEOERAL STANDARD 595C (SEC. 116705.1.1.5) �� I' ' EXISTING DRILL � � RIGHTOF WAY � - �� \ � � \ � —� `EXISTING �� I � DRNEWAY ��.��'�! �� ' f '- ACCESS. N.I.C. � ��_�1"��-''R � .. . � �. -' -- . � �� . � . J —� ,_ �- X I —_��X-'"�-'" . - ,� . :�� __ _��-- — -----� � �—� � _ _..� �`�� _�_�-- � . EXISTINGCHAIN � �. �x , � . � �--- — � � �-- � LWKFENCE � _ ' � . . . . � -� � �� I __ �� . ��- _� � � �� 5G-� � �" �_ q � � a �. �� --- ...... d � — � � � � ,. , �_; - .- a � ,. _ � . -- _ . �� . �� . �- _ _ _ . , , _ � ❑ F-^�- • • — — �,�� • �... _-. .:. � ' a . : C� OS — — — a • . , . 'a . .._ , • . 4 �- . � � , �, , .�� • 8 �.- , TYP� � - � PROPOSEDTRASH � � COMPACTOR W! NEW CONC SLAB ON GRADE 1 a . l � i �_ i� � .�_=___ � ' • ` - •a 3 � - _ � PROPOSEJ TRJCR � � i .�`,. ��o o��,vc�ocKs �, � � �- r s- �� NP. --- � �� 10 ` I� I ��.-^ o� � �� o o �' =lo � � I I C I C � � II C i � � I C I `- PROPOSEO ' `� COMPACT VEHICLE SPACES � C C C C� � � C C ❑ �� o � o o c� ��X:,:��_-��) x —� I I 5 � O E%ISTING DOOR ' TO REMAIN--. J / I/ �� i � I � � � � I � � . � � � � m-1 0 �X -�— -----"'�- - �`X_�rR_"-___4z,.. .: 26'.5„ ��X_.: c-�Iolo��I�l X � .K.�_ '. �'"�---��_ �� 0� I � II I, _�..._-.--'��- � o� I I �I I.; . -�..-.-.-�-�.:... � �Ic� � � i 19 I x G I � X x i I ' 'C I � � i9 I � � o � c= C � � �� ,....._„_._.-., `�.�.� i.,..,"'_�- I�X X � � o� ��u.��-' EXISTINGCHAIN 0 0 �-,.: '�,!^JRFENCE �' �_----x ,--�—x _ . � NEW17W.x10'H. ROLLUPDOOR � 18, 0'• Zy. 0�. �0 EXISTING DOOR � TOREMAIN 16 - m 5 0 - i6 - � � � �I i6 - CANOPYABOVE,TVP U � 69,750 SQ.FT GLA � PER 1010.7.9.3 OF THE 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING GODE' A READILV VISIBLE DURABLe SIGN IS POSTED ON THE EGRESS SIDE ON OR ADJAGENT TO THE DOOR STATING: THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKGC WHEN THIS SPACE IS OGCUPIE�. � THE SIGN SHALL BE IN LETTERS i INCH (25 MM) HIGH ON A CONTRASTING BACK- GROUND. ---- EXIT-B NEwRooF a�° T �'� � ACCESS „ I � NEW �FF��E�S, RESTR��MS. .. ,• I�. 20•-��, CASH AND VAULT ROOM'S, AND EXIT-A �,I� 14 NEWAUTOMATIG CUSTODIA�AREA.SEEA701 - I. 15 DOORSLIDER � �. �' � ` 9 l;� ,z ��Y�� .. } � � �^�� j 5�_2. Ja. � J �� 9 0 EXISTING PUBLiG � �.�. �- � .,,� RIGHTOFWAY � ,„, � � � � � � o � ZO�.O�. � - I 18'1.• 23•it" - 4 �z � — - � f- - — 5 0 � °jI - II ,2 — — - - i��9� �5 �.. � - ��1�—�` `. . � .� .. .. ; , . �. . nP ,, � � za�-o��. .~ 1 2a,-o, Z4,-o,. � za.-a�. za -o° �, za.-o�. za o••� �, z�— � z� a o � z� a°—��. � O EXI� RIGHTOF WAY rvo 0 0 ,� ` � � REFERElVCE SITE PLAN NORTH � SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" NOTE: li 1. USING ADA STANDARDS TO GAIN I FULL ACCESS COMPLIANCE. I 2 THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH '� THE 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDWG CODE, 2016' CALIFORNIA RESIDENTAL CODE (WHERE APPLICABLE), 2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, AND 2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, INDLUDING ALL AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED IN ORDINANCE �889. 3. WHEN PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING CODE PLAN CHECK, THEY WILL INCLUDE A COMPLETE UNDERGROUND PLUMBING PLAN INCLUDING COMPLETE DETAILS FOR THE LOCATION OF ALL CITY-REQUIRED BACKWATER PREVENTION DEVICES. USE MERCANTILE (M) STORAGE, STOCK, SHIPPING, MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL, DESIGN BUILO ROOM (51) OFFICE (B) TOTALOCCUPANTLOAD TYPE OF GONSTRUCTION AILOWABLE AREA PROPOSED HEIGHT FlRE PROTECTION STRIPING STANDARD STRIPING COLOR �HEDULE ITEM�. COLOR' PARKINGSTALL WHITE LETTERING "NO PFUZ�(ING" RED "STOP BAR" WHITE ACCESSIBILITY SYN30L BLUE / WHITE SYMBOLS ACCESSIgLE LOAD1tiG B�UE LOADING ZONE YELLOW DIRECTIONALSIGNAGE WHITE CENTER L�NE SiF21P:,+1G WHITE NOTE: ALKYD-REAG'Y MIXED, RAPID ORYING TRAFFIC PAVEMENT STRIPING. DftY FIl7lTHICKNESS MINIMUM OF 4 MILS. KEY NOTES Oj EXISTINGDRIVEWAYACCESSN.I.C. O EXISTING PARK<'IG FIELD, N.I.C. O3 NEW GONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE AT TRUCK LOADING AREA. O4 NEWPARKINGFf`L� OS NEW PARKING 7SLAND 6O EXISTING RETARi4NG WALL O7 NEWFLUSHCIFiBGONDITION Oe EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN, NP. O9 EXISTINC-SITELIGHTINGTOREMAIN 10 EXISTING TRAAiSFORMER ANO VAULT LOCATION 11 EXISTiNG FIRE 4YDRANT, TYP. 12 NEW AUTOMAT� DOOR SLIDERS AT MAW ENTRANCE/EXIT 13 EXISTING TELEQIiONE/ELECTRICAL BOX LOGAT!ON 14 NEW ACCESS RAMP 75 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY i6 EXISTINGSTRUCTURETOBEREMOVED NOTE SITE PLAN SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. NO SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING MADE-ALL CONDiTIONS ARE EXISTING. FLOOR AREA EXISTING AREA'. 72,D6& S.F. AREA REMOVED: 2,338� S.F. REMAINING GLA AREF' fi9,750 S.F. OCCUPANT LOAD AREA OCCUPAM LOADFNCTOR 57 828 SF 60 GRt755 8,8195F 300GROSS 3,103SF 100GRQS5 fi9 750 SF IIBUILDING DATA UNLIMITE� (60' YARD ON AL60.� 35'-0" FULLYSPRINKLEREO OCCUPANT LOAO 9fi4 30 32 1;026 � � � I� S AKE R��MOA A R C H I T E C T 5450 E High Street, Sulte 200 Swttsdale, Arizona 85054 p: 480.515.5123 f: 602.513J193 www.sra360.com 5E� AR�H �c�,� �RM REliy� �r � �� t * 02-02-2018 � 9T REN: �2 fo FOF C `FO O w U � N a � � m �� ►�i � F n � . �; �i� � � �� oV� �� a � Ig�yr . JJ �� W ` �� o u.o �� $� � O V� W � Q Q � � Q �y�� U 1 ` QW � � Q'n � V az J 1�^� uJ�M r W � U d a 0 n � date: 02/02/18 issued for. DESIGN REVIEW rewsion date: job no.: 17-072 sheet title: REFERENCE SITE PLAN sheet no.: as1 ; � �— . _ _ __ __ _ _ _ r _ ___ � ___ __ ra� _ _ __ _ . �� S AKE FiEIN DERSMA A R C H I T E C T 5450 E. High Street, Suite 200 Scottsdale, Arizona 85054 p: 480.515.5123 f: 602.513.719° www.sra360.com � �!►`�� ti� � � 00 � � o�u o W � k ou.o �� V W � �►�/ r� � � U N O n �� k� s � 0 0 �- Q� oQ � U Qw �Q �� QZ J �' � l.Ci � � m date: 02l02/18 issued for: DESIGN REVIEW revision _ _ _ date: �job no.: 17-072 sheet title: FLOOR PLAN sheet na.: � _ _ _ _ . __ _ _ __ : _ _ �.. _-- _ _ --- EXISTING CANOPY TO REMAIN AND TO BE REFURBISHED - NP. --- : , r - O S A K E R E I N D E R S M A A R C H I T E C T 5450 E. High Street, Suite 200 Scottsdale, Arizona 85054 p: 480.515.5723 f: 602.513.7193 wwwsro360.com � �� a� � � � �-i � ��.s y� � �� ; �� oV�- � � �sT � 8� ..�ii� � a _�� o u�.o �� V� W � � Q� oQ �.� � c� � � Qw � � �a o c� az J d" � �� m � V N O a PROPOSED CANOPY ,� EXISTING TENANT ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" NORTH date: 02/02/18 issued for. DESIGN REVIEW revision date: n o.: job no.: 17-072 sheet title: EXISTING ROOF PLAN sheet no.: � � � �' NEW EXTEN�ED PARAPETBEYOND h20' 8" T.O.PARAPET P4 I P1 13'-4" I 8.0. CANOPY � � 1 NEWCANOPY -� pl��,,,,,, S3 I P3 � WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 5 NEWPARAPETBEVOND �N-FILL AREAS TO BE PAINTED SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 4 �. _ �, I � E i J H � � I EXISTING WALL I REVEAL _ _ � _� �_ �_ _ �li I! iI; I��..,� AIVU hlKt KIJtK PIPES P1 G i i �G � � _� _ _ _ ;Ij ii If I' I—r-i — H J i i DOOR SLIDER F E D C B � � � I I i I I I _...� _ _..__._._... ..___"'....__ l� 6EYOND ROOF REVEALG WALL . _ i i _�. ��I� P1 �� ; .�; .I�' I P2 I � I �; �> �'. I' P3 L I I': I 'I� .I;� I: 'IE _I. Q � I ....... � il � � RAILS AND RAMP ��Fu�, A � � B� 2 � EXISTING ROOF � ...... ... � BEYOND .._.. kI .. _ .. . . _.___. ....__ _I.._. ..__ ...___._._____._.. ._.._ ..__' { � .... __ � I .— �-- , �o._o�� P ro NEw ; ' SCREEN � _ _ � ' i` � `!� .. � ',� :_i � . . ' -�. � IN-FILL AREAS TRASH COMPACTOR TO BE PAINTED DOOR �7RASH COMPACTOR � IOCATION 1 � � � EXISTING) 20'-10" +/- � T.O.PARAPET II � I- 13. 4.. } 1 B O_ EXISTING I 1 �,—. GANOPY NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" B i i I EXISTING - CANOPY TO REMAIN 2 �I EXISTING ROOF � BEYOND P1 �� TII C D I � EXISTING ROOF I aFvnn�n LOCATION (BEYOND) � NEW LOADING DOCKS WITH NEW ROLL-UP DOORS EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" i � � K 39. 9" 14, 0" 1.-0z. �.4Z. 35'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPE . � I 32' 6., A.F.F. REFURBISH EXISTING T.O. TOWER � CANOPY TO REMAIN � � ~S3 _ I � � ��:1 :_ ` I �'. I I NEWAUTOMATIC EXISTINGGA METER STOREFRONT SLIDING DOORS NEW EXTENDED PARAPET h4' o" Y T.O. NE W CANOPY P1 P2 3 I NEW EXTENDED PARAPET EXISTING WINDOW SYSTEM TO BE REPLACEO-MATCH EXISTING F i i �.,,�r�.�(. � � 5 I NEW PILASTER NEW COLUMNS FLUSH W/ BLDG EXrERIOR 35'-0" � _.. _ NEW —' — " ��— �i_ — _ "�" TA.TOWERA.fF. PILASTER 32'-6" NEW CANO � . .._ - .+ T.O. PILASTER NEW EXTENDED �� I PARAPET �{ � �� ' . THIS NOT CONF ....__.._.. __._...._ _.... .� . ... .... . __ . _ .. _. .. - � 20, 9" �.�-j T.O.(E) TILT PANEL � � ia,_o.. h � T O. NEW CANOPY ay, - �� Y .�- (MATCH EXISTING N� � w CANOPY) ..14..�.:A.......V��G. �x o � � v z w....... ��'x � x a. o.. _ �N. FLOOR NEW PILASTER K L i _ �. � ;� i � i P;SAAPET WALLL � � �`lOND � 24 8 /` �.. _ _ � _. _--� T.O.PARAPET O S A K E R E I N D E R S M A A R C H I T E C T 5450 E. H�gh Street, Suite 200 Scottsdale, Arimna 85054 p: 480.515.5123 f: 602513J19' www.sra360.com � � � �€� ��i �, �� s$ �� ¢�6$ oV a d I�� ..� � � � � c -�x@ o Y�.� �� d�E's � O Vo W� Q � � � Q �� U �� Q� � � Qr^ 0 V Q z J �V/'� � V J �/�r� � W � U N O d date: 02/02/18 issued for: DESIGN REVIEW revision date: job no.: 17-072 sheet title: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS sheet no.: � �1 ; .. I ' ia�n err�ti�ee --� PARAPETBhYOND Jl2a-$� � LO- PkRAPET �.: � 13 4' _ B.O. CHNOPY �^ � • , NEW CAN(7PY - Es.m-:'s ;2.� � � i�, � 5, � � �:: �_� ; . �,� 'U '. � ' ,�� ;� � � � � � - � � � � � ,,. z„ � , t � - '� ; . � � � � .i.. �. , . �,. :. - � ' � .. : .t.` .. , ^c. . __- -.,c -..__- - _N'cSN PfLAS. ER -� .'__'_ � .. � . ,.,. �� '� �� - ' � � LJ A Iv . � � � :," , ' . . . . . . . , ... . , _ � � � r�v 2� �_ _ _ _ . ., . _ , _ . . .'. ' . ' � � ` .,,,�,.�,wo d S GNAr' � �� PC .. . _.� �, • , < - . _ - _ . � ..,... ..... �.._4_.�.. _ y �,. . , . ' . . � ' � ., - � . . � �.. ,�,_: . ..._..__ a.-. .�+�-,w. .. ..u., F..�.-.. ...., ....... � .. �. �. � � � G ; � A F F. � � O. ,. � . � � � i :. \ r,- . �_. 32. 6" . � . ' NEW CA�+lOPY ----. � �� Pt ��. . . , _ . T.(` �� ASTER . . . ..�r--- k ST(P ( fc'G�JE . I : NEW EXTEhDEO —,, NE:N HXTChDpib --� ��\ _ �� f ; � i., 3�Y9�.0 � PARAPET � PAft4FCT . . � � _..._ _ �;, . . � � � . � � � � S3 � _. . .. _ ..._ .. , ..� _ .._ _ _._; S3 � 'g�`��4�� } �r . S � ' �. w�`' °p �+ �;; � � y�"�� .� f_ . ... . -�i : . . �. -} P4 i u r-� r � S1 k � � � � � i i k � . �; � ' � � ' � � . � �:i. . ."'.; �. - - - - ��_ 14,_�. ....._ ..._ _.. _.._. _ �...,....._. _..._...._. ...._. . . ,._.... .... _.._. _._ ...._,___ _._ ".__. _.. . .. -.-. .. -. , .- ! ... . _.._: _'_ _ _._ .- __ -.. _ _ _ .---,.-.g. . �.. .__— . ...t... .�-� . .,. � _ .__�__._.',_" .__ .....—�.-..4. _s.- ..... ' ._..""'" ' .__,._ _ .; __ `... T:l��. �i�bd �;.ANOPY . . : ` _ .. . ...,. _ . . .. .. .. r, .... ...r , ...�c... _ . :::�_ . � ... �..: . � . � . .._ ..... ... .,.... -;..... Pi . , r i"�� ,. .:.xo..._ "C,.'.. . .. .� :_. . , .; ,';. i.�� "�'�'— .. ... .:. �.,w`� . . -h . � .: .. -, �.: �_ . , ,_ � _� ;. , . � . __ � � � ..�.... .t �.. ., .�:�. , . ,,.. . . .::�.. ,. .. . ` ... � _..�, � . � �� .., � : .�: .. ,.> � � .... . .. ..�.: :�:: . , :2..:: ... ... , .., . .t:.: , : ......�, ,, v. ��`.. ,.. �.. x: .,.. rn+..-;rc�_x�sTwc t. .. �� .: >.. ,. , � � � �. � ,. j� ` i, - `� G � =-�'---a � ; . : ` �.a ��uoPv� .-. � i` . 5"t �' � ��y�-''. �,_, # a` � � � .. n .^ r � , t-- , ,^^,�„4�,-� - 7J y ' �a . ., ; � � e u w a , . : � � . . , s � .._�_ �� , . .-�`� .;g; g a w x . . . ' . -.:,,,_ ..,.. . . . . .. : : .. . ; .: ., .... . -�,. . ...,.. ......:. . . '�:x . : �: „ .... ..:. , -s- ' . t :,,,. ., T.: '£_. - ,., .; :':.. . .... .... '.�. l x. . .r,..� .. ..: . �... ,. ..,; �.3,... k. :.., )rc � ... � � � _ .. , r . . . _ . , .. ....,..r, . . . .,:� . . . .. .: .. .. ........v h. ....... � -.. � _ r� ,R .... ., . " .. C `M.�.',+;.o .�e'. xk... '. ., '. ,.., �, .t....� ��; _. .... . . .t�. '.. ,. .. .. F ... . ... ....... . �..:, .y. , w;?^ ... , e„ . ,, i :':_ , . _.-, . : ' ,. � .. ,.... ..,;,... .r..� . , > � �i. , ..: ...., . " � .... .. '�.\;.2":2'G, .. .:@, tl u. ,..... _,.... .... :�: .� �.. ` _.� , . : " .�. , .,_1..r ... _.`�i_`k ,Y'_. < ,;. a ... ��. . � _.. .'�..N.,�d:. x ��. '- � �� - . '.'.. . _ _ , . . ..W._� _ e ._ .. „z�_�,�. ,.�u.. x� L .�._,« � =,_o,� : = �<. -, .� , ;. _ t . � >' _ '.`.. � ,,. � . :� ... . ,. , . , _ _ f 'c_ 1� s .�a .,,.�.,. , � . , ;. , : t . ,�...: , ,:. , .t.�.. �„> , , r.. .,o-?� �t..t"v ... „ ,, . . �:< � _, .e .. � T; , �. r� ,,�",, . ,,,, „ �� r . ,.� , . . �: .. . . _ � � . ,� ,,. �. ,�.. � ._.. �'` . . ._, . , �: � . . . .... . ,. ...w _, . �:. .. � .. ... .. .... . ... � . ��_. �. ... . ��.. . r .�}1 � „.. . . � . . ... _. .t .,..,....a... ... ,. ... ..... r. �.., ..- . .-+. .. ..�''.t...:,. .. .�. :,_. ......, .. � ....... .... � , .,:.�. ,. . . , -,. . ,... . M., , . � , . � ... ....... .. . � -;:.... . t .xr� . ... . . .. �,�.�.. ..,..... . �. .. .., _ . .: ..._. .. . ....� .. :Xa . _...: -., ... ._ . . :.: . . .^�.. ,r� ,: . . -��,:,. . t.,.�..:..: , r .� '. , t ..�, . ��: .� s,:. ::.,ti-,= :,'r:. . e3k"r . .. ^ `_ ,a �:,:.. . . �:: '� .,r..a ac.�nmr �,___ . -.�x..w..-.. « x_,..�,.: ,_s.. ..r. fi ac ....�< �.,. z.c-,.: _ ..� ri . .._a.-�J. ' .,�... � .t �.�--- . . . ' . ' ' - ' - �Xi�"�.i'tt.�-PiWf i . .. ,. , , . ._ � � � � . . � . . �. . � . aE�r*LR..CU P .. *:-., t ' . � 1 NORTH ELEVATI�N � � % SCAIE: 3/32" = 1'-0" � EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3l32" = 1'-D" � �---- ._ .- -- � NEW EXTEM�ED PARAPET �C� ; �,j ' E F 1 , �, � � � `--EX tii�6ROOF' . .EXI`, t t ( / Es yONiT � � . � . �LiG,'Tt C;T�I ��;<� _ �-r 'L` � s -� -------/ . �. � a_ a.. �•��-} � REF�R615NE<;STIPJ� �" � CANGP'r TO REtAn tJ � � � , �) � t � EX;57�NG jCPNGPY � � TG RcMAIN V (MATGH EXIS� INC C.4NONY} �; �i : WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR COLQR LEGEND E,�T^ STO COLOR: NA17-0034 -"FlIGN RERECTiY� WHITE" EIFS FINISH: #t94 STOLIT LOTUSAN lIMESTJNE EZ STOCO�OR�NA17-0035-"DORfANGRAY' �-� EIFS FINISH: #t94 STOLIT LOTUSAN LIME53�NE E3Y STO COIOR�. NA17-0030 -"URBANE BRONg' EIfS FINISH'. #194 STOLIT LOTUSAN UMES30NE Ea EIFS SAND B�AST FINISH COIOR TO MATCrSHERWIN WILLIAMS 6868"REAL RED" �� STQ COLOR: NA77-0034 -"HIGH REFLECTIY= WHITE' � STO LITE EIFS PANEIS: #194 STQLIT L0T135?N LIMESTONE /� STO COLOR: NA17-0035- "DORIAN GRAY' U STO LITE EIFS PANELS: #194 STCLIT LOTtiSAN LtMESTONE CS3? STO COLOR: NA17-0030 -"URBANE BRON�' � STO �ITE EIPS PANEIS�. #194 STOLIT LOTUFl�iV UAIESTONE P�) STO COLOR'. NA 17-0034 -"HIGhI RtFLECTPV� WHITE" FAINT; k217 570 C;OI.OR LOTUSAN /^� STO COLOR' NA77-0035 - "DORIAN GRA7'" �� PAINT�. #217 STO COLOR LOTUSAN �\ STO COLOR: NA17-0030 - "UR6ANE BROP.IZ�' � PAINT: #277 STO COLOR Lt�TUSAn P-0� SHE-R4YIN WILLIAMS o'868'REhL RED" METAL TO BE PAINTED V,'ITH'DIRECT TU ME'fs�'% Di',S j PFINT GENERAL N�TES: 1. WHEN THE ENTRY E�FS IS FIELD APFLIED, FIN�Tf TO 6E PAINTED WITH STO COAT ACRYL PLUS STO CO�OR MAt7-W3c_ 2 A!L STOUTE PANELS ( S�, S2. RND S3) WILI S=PABRtCATEO WITH THE SSO COLOR ACRVLIC PIUS COATING ( PROT£CRVE COATING) ALREADY A?PLIED AND WILL EXTEND ALL THE WAY UP. � � I I� � 5 A K E R E 1 N D E R S M A � A R G H 1 T E C T i5450 E High Street Si ite 200 Scottsdale Arimna $5054 I I p�460S155123 f:602.5137193 . vww,sra350.crnn i � ..S ; �.. � � �� t'; i � ..� ; g.; � I � � ' N �O E � � '} ; 00 ��, _��- oV� � aQ� � C� N Z U �WY � r CS C � : .�� V �� N � � -_S� N (n � I � � � � ` • • a � � � � � • � � y • ' • �� 1 U � � 1 Q �3� �,2 % � I.� . .. . . . .) . �� Y �, . �� ` � �- _ �- � �_ � .. . �� . „ � � '' . � . 7�� . .. �:�. .� :. . .'; ' ,_�. I �XISTING ROOF � . � . � � ; � . . . ... . . .... .. . � � BEYOND � . . -- _ iexisnNc�au io .,-�L I � � T_G.PARAPE'f � I �,�. __ _ ..� � j � __ "_1 I � ` �oors � ;e� � . . . , " . . ::r:. �.r., �. c, .�. ., -.. � . , � . ' . � - : . . , � �, eG�'Y t 'Yx..�. §' � .3� W.. sY+�r ' "�:t - .,,,�.,..= �_ - ''') I..H.. t'.f7 � J ,-.�-+�.T..�.� 7 - "�: �il Tmm .. � L� M � C � � i ...:...,:.�.... .... _.., . . I ... - ��— aAK4 , ' 1,:�t�l -� I . ... �._. . � ��Y.,NO . �� 24 -B' /b , �.'�" _`�. � �.� �• - Tfl. PARAPET �USTOMER PICK-UP CANOPY OPTION 1 _ �_ � i J,) �� G ' � �� '� ��Bi �AJ . ( ' � ; ' � i I � I y-�� i I��: � �: . � � �. . j . � f [ I �'_ U"AF.F_ � � ' � ' . I . . � , ._ � � � .. TVWEP. � . ... . i ' I � i � ' I . ,.. � .. I _ I � EXIST,�G NJAuL . EXISTItJG R��OF — EXISTMG kdA�l ( . . ; �2cVFAl '�. 2EYOND RtiEPl � � r � , ; � . _ _ � _ . . . .. ._ __,. . /� - . < _ _� , � • ; ;� -., _� . . %: . .� . . . .;.. �, �„ � _ �/ i 11 i � � � � � � '��,._,� � � texisTrNc> ac�-io- r�- � � T.(). PARAPET \ � �. � � iY .. � �', . " �'_ __..._ . .. � "____ ___ _'_.__"_ '.._ .—___. ._'__'.\—_ ;' __'_____'__' ____"'__' ".__"'_ `�_'_'.__ __ .__ ....._ ._. ._._ . � .: � ` . , . , c � i ,. " '_�� , ^ �� - �\ �� ; �- � � � �' �,a Et k :.� '�A�' t'�F l (�C . '� v _ � . � .. _ a �: F �., �^-i 1 L - .... .�: � ... , � '. `. . � , rca�. . ,r;,, ,.� .4' S�. , ,� 3, � ;; � me � n �4 :. r..=.�. � �, �' <. 4•• , r u _r�..�:rry =/'n.1 '�s..s.T 'u.P n�rtrn+r ��'� - - _ , ..n:+z srY'�. `rvk� .'iv �a*x -�`« 'a.+..sa.� �c:F[� '%wM�^ "�s�Paxvmpcme!'mm 'a'.am,'.quur�i n- ,�vearv"..�.mu . . � .. �. . . , �. '9 �, v�^x .. . ..: ...... . `. ,.. .. . �'.��. ..�. � . ..� c � ..� �µ,� _ O ,��:� z �n.� I � ��t �il.�lf � �. 1��i i3 � .. , . � � � � ..'�;'� ' � �. � etEv7-.U4;�k ... . ' ° \ r . _, �y � - � � � , .a� � � e„_ ._ , _ ,; _ _ __ _ } �� NEW P�RF �'ET EFYO'JCl , � .: � ` . , . . .. � �� ' ;',. - �.--� . , . , _ __ . '. (i . I; . . .. ... (; .. � �. r . . , _. _ _..w�..� r. . �� . i. � � ��. _W_.._ � Pi - �_ .._ ,. �G:;r.. �ord SOUTH ELEVATION SCA�E 3/32" = 1'-0" o -e� FIN FLOOR �—� SCREEPI e ! .:; n"� � �" �so_r�t�rirvc , � �� (ANOF�'1 j date: 12l22l17 ; issued for: � _ DESIGN REVIEW ; revision no.: date: jjob no.: 17-072 sheet title: I ; EXTERIOR ELEYATIONS ; sheet no.: I I i � � L___-__-_-.__--.__ �) �� > � � ! i I � � � � . . � . � . . '�. � � �zs-o q ro ex�srwcRooF NEW EXTENDED PARAPETBEYOND� 13 4 B.O. CANOPY NEW CANOPY — EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-D" P1 . .... P3 ... . . .. ��, . ...... . � PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION � L � SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" �25� � T.O. EXISTING ROOF 1 ��, o. Y rirvian r��vrc EXISTING EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" �EXISTING ROOF BEVOND ! P1 P1 P2 NEW EXTENDED � ._ . . .. .. . .... .. . PARAPET .. ..... 0_0.� FINISH FLOOR NEW CANOPY ` PAftAPET WALLL /�' EXISTING ROOF EXISTING EXISTING WALL � �" '�' BEYOND EXISTING // BEYOND LIGHTING,TYP. REVEAL �"" '� Zy._g.� CANOPY. � / .. ... . . . ....... . ..... .. .. . . . . . ....... . . . . . ...... ..... .. .. . ... . . .. .. .. .. . . .. _... . . . . _ .. .. . \. ..... ..... . T.O. PARAPET TO REMAIN � � P1 � � , � . P4 .. .. .._ . . 20-7 � , T.O. PARAPET P4 (I� ..... P� p� '. . � ...... . Si is e il 13-4"t/" I) TO. PILASTER �B.O. EXISTMG . : . .. ._.. .... _. .. 1 .... .. .. .. . _ t. ..... CANOPY ` — — P2 � P2 ��1.�, ,..._ . _.. � I P2 P2 � f � : 53 I ' � � S2 �f ... i . � _ " _ __.. . . ---- --- �--.. �� ... . .. . . . . ... .. . — .. ,._ _ � �� ...._ S3 ---- _ p P3 � � :. }" � A3 . . 1., , P3 '. . . � . — � � . o._p. — — - _ - - — ---- ----- ------- ----- 1'-s'--- ---- NEW PIJ{STER FIN. fLOOR �� ` � � P� EXISTING BOLLARDS P4 P4 �P4r NEW PiLASTER TRASH COMPACTOR AND FIRE RISER NEW ROLLUP DOOR NEW AUTOMATIC `--` NEW SAFETY LOCATION (BEYOND) NEW LOADING DOCKS PIPES DOOR SLIDER R41LS AN� RAMP WITH NEW ROLL-UP DOORS EXTERIOR COLOR LEGEND KE�G�STO COLOR' NA77-0034 -"HIGH RERECTNE WHITE" EIFS FINISN: #194 STOIR LOTUSAN LIMESTONE OSTO COLOR: NA17-0035 -"DORIAN GRAV" EIFS FINISH: #194 STO�IT LOTUSAN LIMESTONE E3 STO COLOR: NA17-0090 -"URBANE BRONZE" EIFS FlNISH: #194 STOLIT LOTUSAN LIMESTONE E4 EIFS SAND BLAST FINISH COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN VNLLIAMS 6868 "REALRED" OS� STOCOLOR'.NAi7-0034-'HIGHREFLECTIVEWHITE" STO LITE EIFS PANELS: #194 STCLIT LOTUSAN �IMESTONE OSZ STO COLOR'. NAi7-0035 -"DORIAN GRAY" STO LRE EIFS PANEIS' #?94 STOLIT LOTUSAN LIMESTONE 53 STO COLOR' NA17-0030 -"URBANE BRONZE" STO LITE EIFS PANELS: N194 STOLIT LONSAN LIMESTONE P� STO COLOR' NA 17-0034 -"HIGH REFLECTIVE VuHITE" PAINT' p217 STO COLOR LOTUSAN Pz STOCOLOR:NA77-0035-"DORIANGRAV" PAINT: #217 STO COLOR LOTUSAN P3 STOCOLOR:NAi7-0030-"URBANEBRONZE" PAINT: #217 STO COLOR LOTUSAN Pa SHERWINWILLIAM56868'REALRED" WETAL TO BE PAINTED WITH "DIRECT TO METAL" ( DTM ) PAINT GENERAL NOTES: t. NMEN THE ENTRY EIfS IS FIELD APPLIED, FINISH TO BE PAINTED WITH STO COAT ACRYL PLUS STO COLOR NAt7-0036. 2. ALL STOLI7E PANELS ( Si. S2, AND S3) WILL BE FABRICATEO WiTH THE 5T0 COLOR ACRYLIC PLUS COATING ( PROTECTIVE COATING) ALREADV APPLIED AND WILL EXTEND ALL THE WAY UP. � S A K E R E I N D E R 5 M A A R C H I T E C T 5450 E High Street, Su�te 200 Scottsdale, Arizona 85054 p: 480.515.5123 f: 602.513J193 www.sra360.com E� NRCy � ��µM RE�� s * 02-02-2015 ? 9T RFN: �2 ` F FO o pF ��\ 0 � U aQi � � �-� � n�� .� �j' �� I � O �B� �� S �� C Y OVa � � �� o Jm f� � W � � e�� o W� �� O Vo W � Q a °' � Q �� v �� l.l._ Q/ � � LJ Q Z J V � � �M r W � �d a Y date: 02/02/'18 issued for: DESIGN REVIEW revision date: no.: job no.: 17-072 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" NEW COLUMNS FLUSH WI BLDG EXTERIOR NEW PILASTER NEW CA� NEW EXTENDED — PARAPET �� 1��b��' _��b�G �_. y w EXISTING VNNDOW SYSTEM TO BE NEW PILASTER REPLACED-MATGH EXISTING \� � � � I 'I NEW PILASTER 35'-0" � ... .... :.-:- .... ... : ':"_�, T.O.TOWERA.F.F. 32'-6" ��. �. T.O. PILASTER •A —�� THIS NOT CONFIRMED 20' 9" T.O. (E) TILT PANEL ia_o..� T.O. NEW CANOPY (MATCH EXISTING CANOPI� 0'-0" /L _ FIN. FLOOR 25'-0"/l �� T.O. EXISTING ROOF 20'_8,/l T.O. EXISTING PARAPET 15'_0" T O. EXISTING PARAPET sheet title: DESIGN ELEVATIONS sheet no.: � � �/� cXISTING ROOF dEYOND EXISTING 20'-10" +!- TO PARAPET !- 13' 4' B.O. EXISTING CANOPY 0 0' /L FIN. FLOOR EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION SCA�E: 3/32" = 1'-0" � NEW PARAPET BEYOND �EXISTING ROO� BEYOND � I � P1 IN-FILL AREAS TO BE PAINTED PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/32" = 1'-0" EXISTING WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" O O IN-FlLL AREAS TO BE PAINTED (EXISTING 20'-10" +/- T O PARAPET /- � 3 _4, � � B O. EXISTING GANOPY P4 o,-o,. _ FIN. FLOOR EXTERIOR COLOR LEGEND � E� �STO COLOR: NA17-0034 -"HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE" EIFS FINISH'. #194 STOLIT LOTUSAN LIMESTONE OSTO COLOR: NA� 7-0035 -"DORIAN GRAV" EIFS FINISH'. #194 STOLIT LOTUSAN LIMESTONE E3 STO COLOR' NA17-0030 -"URBANE BRONZE" EIFS FlNISH'. #794 STOLIT LOTUSAN IIMESTONE E4 EIFS SAND BIAST FINISH COLOR TO MATCH SHEftWIN VNLLIAMS 6868 REFL RE�" S� STO COLOR: NA17-0034 -"HIGH RERECTIVE WHITE" STO LITE EIFS PANELS: #194 STOLIT LOTUSAN LIMESTONE OSZ STO COLOR'. NA17-0035 -"DORIAN GRAY" STO LITE EIFS PANELS'. #194 SiOL1T LOTUSAN LIMESTONE 53 STO COLOR'. NA17-0030 -"URBANE BRONZE" STO LITE EIFS PANELS: #194 STOIIT LOTUSAN LIMESTONE P� STO COLOR: NA � 7-0034 -"HIGH REFLECTNE WHITE" PAINT: #217 STO COLOR LOTUSAN PZ STO COLOR: NA17-0035 -"DORIAN GRAY" PAINT' #217 STO CO�OR LOTUSAN P3 STO COLOR: NA17-0030 -"URBANE BRONZE" PAINT: #217 STO COLOR IOTUSAN P4 SHERIMN WILLIAMS 6868 "REAL RED" METAL TO BE PAINTEO WITH "DIRECT TO METAL" ( DTM ) PAINT GENERAL NOTES: 1. WHEN THE ENTRY EIFS IS FIEL� APPLIEO, FINISH TO 8E PAINTED WiTii STO COAT ACRYL PLUS STO COLOR NAi7-0036. 2. ALL STOLITE PANELS ( 51, S2, AN� 53) WILL BE FABRICATED W7TH l'� STO COLOR ACRYLIC PLUS COATING ( PROTECTIVE COATING) ALREAr]V APPLIED AND WILL EXTEND ALL THE WAY UP. � , � �� S AKE REI N D ERSMA ', A ft C H I T E C T�I 5450 E High Street, Suite 2C0 I Scottsdale, Arizona 85054 ' p: 480.515.5723 C 6G2.513J193 www.sro360.com E� ARCy � ��RM REINQ�� J .�G"9'�I:i�� * 02-02-2018 ? yT REN: �2 U F F� o OF ppl\ 0 � U � � � � . � �� V� � �� DVa � �-ts= � �� ..OW e�� o�� g � O V� W �T Q �V/ � Q �� U r! Q w � �/ ^ � V Q Z J �' � ��M �— W � �a C O d T N Y date: 02/C2/18 issued for: DESIGN REVIEW revision date: n o.: job no.: 17-072 P, i u rvcvv, SCREEN .. .,. -. . , . .,.., ._...:. , . . . ., TRASHCOMPACTOR �uv DOOR TRASHCOMPACTOR LOCATION sheet title: DESIGN ELEVATIONS sheet no.: I � —_ — ._ — -- __..._._......_ _ .. ............._._.. .�..,,,,.,,. STOREFRONT SLIDING DOORS � PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION �'�'t/ SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" DEMOLiTION LEGEND I DEMO. KEY NOTES n � \ / � i/ ^ 1 / I STUD WALI TO BE REMOVED MASONRY WALL TO BEREMOVE� WALL TO REMAIN MASONRY WALL TO REMAIN �OOR TO BE REMOVED DOOR TO REMAIN AREA OR FEATURE TO BE REMOVED DEMOLITION ROOF NOTES 1. ALL ROOFING. WORK TO BE COMPLETEO BV LANDLORO (LL) APPROVED ROOFEft. 2. G.C. TO REMOVE ALL RTU'S AND EXHAUST FANS. � C. TO CAP OPENINGS AS REQUIRED FOR A WATER TIGHT SEAL. (PLYWOOD AND METAL CAP) 3. EXISTING BALLASTED ROOF TO REMAIN. O G.0 TO REMOVE EXISTING FARFITION FROM SLAB TO STRUCTURE ABOVE. MAKE REkOY FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION - NPICAL OG.0 TO REMOVE EXISTthG CE1L`NG TI�ES, GRID, AND LIGHTING - TYPICAL OG C TO REMOVE EXIST(NG PWI4FBING FIXTURE. CAP BOTH SUPPLY AND WASTE LIRES. BELOW SLAB - TYPICAL O4 EXISTINGSTOREFRONTTOBEREMOVED-TVPICAL OS EXISTING COLUMNS TO REMAi1:-NPICAL O6 EXISTING ELECTRICAL PANELS TO REMAIN O7 EXISTING FIRE RISER TO BE R�fOVED AND CAPPED BELOW GRADE. Og C.M.U. WALLTO BE REMOVEC-^/PICAL OREMOVE EXISTING MILLWORK GP ELEC. & TELE. DATA-TVPICAL 10 G.0 TO REMOVE EXISTING FLl'.i7R SLAB - TYPICAL. VERIFV IN FIELD � � PORTION OF WALL TO 6E REMOVED FOR DOOR OPENING. SEE FLOOR PCAN ANi3 DOOR SCHEDULE. VERIFY IN FIELD AS TO hiOT DAIfAGE STRUCTURAL CROSS BRACING IN EXiSTING YGaLL 12 13 EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAItL-NPICAL �q EXISTING CONCRETE DOCK SLWB TO REMAIN. 75 EXISTING DOCK LEVELER ANDL-(]UIP. TO BE REMOVE�. �g CONCRETE SLAB UNDER MEZZ0.PfINE AREA TO REMAIN. 77 EXISTING CONCRETE WALK T09E REMOVED, VERIFY IN FIELD TO EXTENT OF DAMAGED CONCRETE WALK. 18 EXISTING FRAMED WALL TO BEftEMOVED - CROSS BRACING, TUBE STEEL AND CMl TO REMAIN GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL CEILINGS, CEILING GRID, CEILING TILES, LIGHT FIXTURES, HVAC DIFFUSERS, SOFFITS AND SAFETY EMCLOSURES, PREP METAL DECK AND STRUCTURE FOR hEW PAINT GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE TLL ABANDONEC WIRING, CONDUIT, LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED STRAPPING, CLIPS AND SUPPORTS REMOVE ALL F.A DEVICES NOT REQUINED TO REMAIN IN PLACE PER LOCAL AUTHORtTY HAV1lG JURISDICTION. I il li I � p � 1 � � ' � �5---=--_ - -- ��k� F===� � I�� I,� � ��- � 11�� C` �7-�IL �`\ i r II I� �I I � II � I I�' � IIII f �I 4\� i - I II I� �II �� lJL� �I ��II -, ��--r�-L--��ji=\S�'� i � u � u=� `-�=== �LJ �� =�u===� �1, Ir—�� l� �� , �, i I L L � I �L � v�� i I— _ I A' i�=�l�� 7 IIr-- i I � A� i � �� \ IW i � �r G �� _� � �] ��,�s --u-=—'�c�— � i I— � � A �ll `�—�\-- i _ L �L� IIL J �� i: � L=---------------J � � � --- -� �r=-� fi� �-�r--� �r-----� -� I JII �'II'' II �'II �' ° I �� II �� II I II _ _ II _ _ _ �� II _ _ _ _ _ �\ �� i I I I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — � —� � � 0 I I I � L J I, �w�.<- .,.,. � i u<� a- ----------x------------------------------------- DEMO FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 6'-0" ,. 12'-1 1i2" �. 13.6. � � I c cu.r�..,o�cr.,� � 11'�0" � NEW OPENING 5 �a DEMO ENLARGED CASE OPENINGS SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" tia rti ro 7-a• iro. �_a. ,�,_a. � 10 �� zo 3�-e o s � i- n��;,,--�� ._ ��;;r��°w�r�!......c �NEWOPENING4� �NEWOPENINGS "' �NEWOPENING2� "' NEWOPENINGrv1 � TVP. � �. I � I I �_. I II t� - I� _ I- - I � �� DEMOLITION NOTES 1. THE GENERAL CONTR4CTOR AND riG SUB-CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIREO TC� V�$!{ 7}{E SITE AND BUILDING PREMISES TO INSPECTEXfSTING CONDITIONS AND BECOME FAMILIAR N�;TH LOCAL CON�ITIONS UNDER WHICH THE WOWS 4S TO BE PERFORMED. 2. THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENI'S t3 TO INC�UDE ALL ITEMS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION A�D COMPLETION OF THE WORK. THE PER�ORMANCE OF THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TQ SE CONSISTENT WITH THE DOCUMENTS AS THE WORK XS pESCRIBED OR REASONABLY INFERRED TO PRO�UCE7'HE REQUIRED RESULTS. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN STRICT COMbP�IqNCE WITH THE CODESTANOFRDSREFERENCED,EXEiUTEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS AN� CONFORM TO THE SPECIFIC REQfsEREhtENTS OF THE OWNER ANDARCHITECT. 4. THE GONTRACTOR IS RESPONSiBIE FOR ENSURING THE PROCUREMENT OF ALL REQUIREG :�ERMITS AND APPROVALS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK AND TO PROVIDE FOR REQUIRE� MSPECTIOfv'S. ALL LICENSES, RECEIPTS FOR FEES P0.SL1 AND PERMITS SHALL BE COPIED TO THE OWNER ANC` T}i.E ARCHITECT UPON RECEIPT OF SUCH. 5. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS, USE Tt{E DIMENSIONS PROVIDED. IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREF,�NCIES, CONTACT THE ONMER OR THE ARCHITECT PRfQR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. ALL DIMENSIONS G14RR rU2E TO NOMINAL ROUGH FRAMING DIMENSIQN,g. 6. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF TRASH AND DEBRIS FFOM THE JOB SITE ON A DAILY BA515. THE DEBRIS f2EMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE SHALL BE DISPOSEO Ilv A LEGAL MANNER IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE NPE OF MATERIALS BEING REMOVED. 7.FINAL CLEAN-UP IS TO INCLUDE: REMOVE DUST. DEBRIS, OILS, STAINS, PAINTS, SPILLS. r{NGERPRINTS, AN� LABELS FROM AlL FINISHEO SURF:�CES. 8. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPOh518LE FOR THE COORDMATION OF ALL TRADES �,�C VENDORS (WHETHERUNDER THEGENERALCO[r,TRqCTOR OWNERNENDOR PROVIDED) NECESSARV FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK AND CERFI!=;CATION OF ALL WORK PRIOR TO THE OPENING DATE S?ECIFIED IN THE BID FORM. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SCHEDULE TO THE OWNEft, WITHIPt 3 DAYS AFTER NOTICE TO PROCEE�, LISTING AL� MtLESTONE TASKS AND EQUIPMENT DELNERY DATES W{;}{ START DATES AND COMPLETION DATES IN A LEGIBLE AND LOGICAL FASHION DEMONSTRATING CONFORMfpNCE WITH THE SCHEDULED OPENING OATE. 9. THE GENER4L CONTR4CTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING ANY CNANGES TO THE PERMITTED WORK TO THE PERMITTING AGENCV FOR REb7SION TO THE EXISTING PERMIT. THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE COPIED WITH ALL REVISED PERMITS. 10. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS R�pONSBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO OFF-SITE PROPERTY, ROAOWAYS, AND LANDSCAPMG. 11. AFTER DEMOLITION IS COMPLETE, THE G.0 IS TO PROVIDE REDLINED AS-BUILT DIMENStQNS TO THE ARCH ITECT TO CHECK AGAiNST THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND COOROINATE WITH FIOOR 8 DECOR FlXTUREPLANS. 12. ALL REMAINING FIXTURES THROUGtiOUT THE SPACE ARE TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF BV G.C. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO SALES FLOOR FIXTURES, STOCK ROOM RACKING, CASI-iWRApS, ETC. 13. G.C. TO GRADE EXISTING BUILDING PAD TO A FLAT CONDITION AFTER CONCftETE SLAB IS REMOVED. 14. G C. TO REMOVE ALL GAS LINES. 15. CONCRETE SLAB TO REMAIN 5'XS' AROUNO THE FIRE RISER AND DEMARK AREA TO REMAIN. i6. G.C_ TO REMOVE ALL SPRINKLER OROPS AND UNITS 17. SMOKE VENTS TO REMAIN DURING pEMO PHASE 18. G.C. TO REMOVE EMERGENCY LlGhIING 2 �� r - -� � I I�----_ I� TYP. 3 3 � � � 7YP. NP. — —I� __----__ —_ -- _ _ � �— �ir�---r=— �r ---- ir--r;rr r=s-- n �_—�—� F-----� _ — ----- I I �i I �--��-----� � I � �' i I ILi �\� � �� I I� � II I�I � �� IIII_ � ��II If \� TYP. I� �I i� � t�r� II i� � I I� ��II�C�' �� i ��\ �� I �II �� j �II ,� �-�II�C� �� li r-_- uL_ �� L� �__=' L=====�L� �__ =9u = � =� 6�j �- II -----�� i� i- � i � II I�� LT LT== �— � L S� � � F—��- �� < �i�� Ir----�Li � ��-- I� �� LL'� �, IL�J �� I� e� II ��_� � � �� I � C � 6—� J�I` —_ —\ —_ �_ \ z � I� � f -- \�`-- -(' I�L� �J / I� �� I L—=TMP______________________J i i � _ L __ —_ � �r===� � �==—�r----� �r------__� -------�0 ��I! ��IIL� If �JII �JII � II II il II � � is c TVP. 4 I I �_ n I I f! I I � f �� II -�s- �i II nP. �\ II I! nP {i li Q�i -�--��1 ___�.x— �i u �� _��_ Li\J I 1 1 L-====___-_______________________________��____ �--�� -------e W 9 p B V L_� 3 DENlO FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" . \ I 5 A K E R E I N D E R S M A A R C H I T E C T 5450 E. High Street, Suite 200 Swttsdale, Arizono 85054 p: 480.515.5123 f: 602.513.7193 www.src360.cam � Fa � �� L►.� � T� �� Cf� � � �-� W � d � � C ` U � o �0 �� r� � O V � � �'� r! � � U � 'o a y� �� 0 �y V a°' 0 Q � U Qw � �� Q z �� - � �� — m date: 02/02/18 issued for: DESIGN REVIEW Irevision date: job no.: 17-072 sheet title: DEMO FLOOR PLAN sheet no.: AD101 LEGEND FIRE EXTINGUISHER ��:_ (WSTALL OPPOSITE SIDE OF ENTRY ON ' SALES FLOOR COLUMNS) V ��R�S�P�T��- FIRE ALARM NOTES 1. THIS BUILDiNG WILL BE E�UIPPED WITH A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF NfPA 72.REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS. 2. SEE ELECTRICAL FOR FULL FIRE ALARM DESIGN CRITERIA. CLASSIFICATION of COMMODf'�'lES 1. THE BUILDING IS CLASSIFIED AS A NON-SEPAR4TED. MERCANTILE OCCVPAt�C.V. 2- THE TENANT WILL STORE CLASS I-N COMMO�ITIES ANC GROUP A PLASTICS M1. THE STOR4GE CONFIGURATION WILL BE HIGH PILED STOR4GE. 3. NO COMMODITIES ABOVE 16'-0" AND NO PLASTICS ABOVE 5'-0". FIRE EXTINGUISHER NOTE i. PROVIOE PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS (FE) IN ACCORDANCE WITH: A TRAVEL DISTANCE TO A FIRE EXTINGUISHER SHALL NOT EXCEED 75 FEET. B. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS Shall. NOT BE OBSTRUCTED OR OBSCURED FROM Vi�,S��_ C. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE CONSPICUOUSLY LOCATED WNERE THcY Ih;LL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE IN THE EVENT OF A EtRc', PREFERABLY THEY SHA�L BE LOCATED ALONG THE NORMAL PATHS OF TRqy��, INCLUDING EXITS FROM AREAS D. THE TOP OF THE FlRE EXTINGUISHER SHALL BEAT 42" A.F.F. E. G.C. TO COORDINATE WITH FIRE MARSHALL. F. G.0 TO TO LEAVE (3) ADDITIONAL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ON SI7E FOR ALLtJ�NSTORES. EVACUATION MAP 1. G.0 TO COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT FOR FINAL MAP AND INSTALL IN THE 6RcAK ROOM AND TRAINING ROOM. MOUNT TO INSIDE FACE OF DOOR. 2. THE MAP SHOULD BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE MERCHANDISE INSTALL DATE. 3. PROVIDE MAPS IN OTHER LOCATIONS ONLV AS RE�UIRED BY LOCAL JURIcDf:,TION. � � , �� STEWAR��O ARCHITECZURE,PLLC 5450 E. High Stree;. Suite 200 Phoenix, Ar¢crra 85054 p' 480.515.5123 www.sra360.cam U 0 � 0 � S�� y � � �� a �_�s � � �� d � C - � 1� �� 0 V W 0 �•-� �' Q � oa �U Qw —� �Q OC� QZ� J� ��O �� m� V N O d Idate: 02/Ob/I S date: � EGRESS PLAN SCALE: 7/16 = 1'-0" �job no.: I'1-O'(2 sheet title: CApE / LIFE SA�ETY PLAN sheet no.: G001 ,_.. .. _.. _ —. _ — _ . _ .. . _ ..._ — _. . _. — ..__— . . . . . . _ .... _. — ._ . . _ .._ ._. ...—._ _. _ —...._. _ _... —. — —. — .— .— .— _ _ — — .. . _—_—_.—._— . . . . L. � - . . ' , . .. . . . . . ' . . . . . -- � ACCESSIBILITY GUiDELINES i. AN UN085T4UCTED PJftNING SPACE OF 60" IN DIFMETER SHALL BE PRCVIpED WITHiN AN ACCESSIBLE TOILET ROOM. 2. 118-604.2 LOCATION. THE WATER CLOSET SHALL 8E POSITIONED WITH N WALL OR PARTITION TO THE REAP. AND TO ONE SIOE. THC CENTERIINE OF THE WATEft CLOSET SHALL W TEP. L ET SHAL� BE 1] INGHES 4�2 �9f� BE il INCHES (432 MM) MINIMUM T018INCHES (45] MM) MA%IMUM FROM THE SIDE WALL OR PARTITION, E%GEPT THAT TiE A G O$ ( ) MINIMUMAND191NCHES(483MM)MAXIMUP.AFROMTHESICEWALLORFARTITIONINTHEAMBULATCRYACCESSIBLETOILETCCMPARTMENTSPECIFIEDINSEC110N11B�60482. i WATER CLOSETS SHALL 6E 4RRl.NGED �pR A LEFT-HFN� OR RIGHT-HAN� FPGROFCH. '��i 118-604 3.i SIZE. CLFPRANCEAROUNO N VJATER CLCSET SHALL BE fi01NCHES (1524 MM) h^INIMUM MEASUftED PERPENDIf,ULAR fROM THE SIOE WALL AND 561NCHE5 (1422 MM) '. MINIMUMMEASUREOPERPFNOICULARFRCMTHEREARWALLAMINIMUM601NCHES11524MMIWIOEAND481NCHES(1219MM)DEEPMANEWERINGSPACESHAlLBE � PR VI�ED IN FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET. 0 i t B-604.�.2 OVERLAP. THE REQUIRED CLEARANCE AROUND THE WAtER CLOSET SHALI BE PERMITfEO TO OVERLAG THE WATER CLOSET. FSS'JCIATED GRAB BFRS, DISPENSERS, SANITARY NAPNIN DISPOSAL UNITS. COAT HOOKS, SHELVES, ACCESSIBLE ROl1TES, CLF.AR FLOOR SPACE AND GLEARANCES REGUIRE� AT OTHER FIXTURES. I H R IREDWATER LOSETCLEARANCE. T T R I PA . N THER FIXT RE OR BSTRUCTICNS SHALL BE LOCATED WITFi N T E E'�U C AN� HE U N NG S GE 00 U 5 0 - TH I AL AND Sfi IN HES 15 4 M�NIDE MINIMUM MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO E S DE W L, G 11B 60M1 8.1.1 S¢E VNiEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE COMPARTMEN S SHALL BE 601NCHES 2 M ( ) ATER L ETS MFASURED PERPENOICUtAR TO T AN� 591N HE ia99 MM DEEP MINIMUM FOR FLOOR MOLINTED W G OS 1422 U�M DEEP MINIMUM FOR WAIL HUNG WATER CLOSE S C S � ) i ) TI N116-6048.1.11 11B-E04.8.1.1.2 T ITI NALLVP40VIOEMANEWERINGSPACECOMPLYINGWITHSEC 0 THEREARWALL.NMEEL HAIRACCESSIBLECOMPARTMEN SSHALLAOD 0 OR i iB 804.8.1.1.3, AS APPLICAe�E. Wr1EE�CHAIR ACCES51B1.E COMGARTMENTS FOR CHILDREN'S USE SHALL BE 60 1NCHES (1524 WIOE MINIMUM MEASURE� PERPENDICUTAR TO THE SIDE WHLL, AN� �91NGHES (1499 MM) OEEP MINIMUM FOR WALL HUNG AN� FLOOR MOJNTEO WATER CLOSETS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO THE REAR WALL. 110-604 8.1.1.1 MANE W ERING SPACE WITH IN-SWINGING IN q NMEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE COMPARTMENT WITH AN IN-SWINGING DOOR, A MINIMLIM 601NCHF.S (1524 MM) WIDE BY 36 1NCHES (914 UM) DEEP MANEUVERING SPACE SHALL BE PROVIOED IN FRONT OF THE CLEARANCE REQUIRED IN SECTION 110�604 B 1.1. $EE FIGURES 118-604 8.1.1 2(B) ANO 11 &604 8 1 � 3(Rj. 118-604.8.1.1 2 MANEUVERING SPACE WITH SIDE-OPENINGN IN A WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE GOMPARTMENT WITH A DOOR LOCATED IN THE SIDE WALL OR PAftTIT10N EITHER IN-SWINGING Oft OUT-SWINGING. A MINIMUM 601NCHES (1524 MM) NIDEAND 601NCHES 1�524 MM) DEEP MANEUVERING SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF THE WATEft ClOSET. SEE FIGURE 11 B�604.0.1.1 2. 110-604.8.1.1 3 MANEUVERING SPACE WITH ENDO�ENING IN A WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIHLE COMPARTMENT WITH A DOOR LOCATEO IN THE FRONT WAIL OR PAftTIT10N (FFCING THE WATER CLOSE'�. EITHER IN-SVNNCING OR OUT-SWINGING, A MINIMUM 601NCHE5 ('1524 MM) WIDE ANO 48 INCHES (1219 MM) DEEP MANEUVERING SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF THE WATER CLCSET. SEE FIGURE 118-644 0.1.1 3. 3. GRAB BARS AT EACH SIOE OR ONE SIDE AND THE BACI( OF THE WATER CLOSET SHALL BE PftOVIDEO AND SECURELV ATTAGHE�: a. �3" MIN T036" MAX TO THE TOP OF THE GRIPPING StIRFACE HBOVEANp PARAILEL TO THE FLOOR. b GRAB BARS AT THE SIDE SMALL BE 42" lON6 ANS SHNLL BE POSITIONED SUCH THAT THE CENTER OF ONE ESCUTCHEON PLATE IS NOT MORE THAN 12" AWAV FROM THE REAR WHLLAND THE OTHER END IS AT LEAST 24" IN FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET c.THE REAR GRFB BAR OF THE WATER CLOSET $HAL� BE MIN. 36" LONG AND SHALL BE POSITIONEO SO THAT THE END CLOSEST TO THE NFAREST SID[ WHLL IS AT LEAST 12" FROM THE CENTERLINE OF TGHE WATER CLOSET TO THE CENTER OF THE ESCUTCHEON PIATE, ANO THE OTHER END IS AT LEAST 24" FFPh1 THE CENTERLINE OF THE WATER CLOSET TO THE CENTER OF THE ESCUTCHEON PLATE. 4. 116-809.2.i CIRCULAR CROSS SECTION. GRAB BARS �h'ITH GIRCULAft CROSS SECTIONS SHALL HAVE AN 0UT510E �IAMETER OF 1�1/41NCHES (32 MM) MINIMUM AND 2 1NCHES (51 MM) MAXIMUM 118-6�9 2 2 NON-CIRCULAR CRO55 SECTION. GftAB BARS WITH NON-CIRCULAR CRO55 SEGTIONS SHALL HAVE A CROSS-SECTION OIMENSION CF 2 INCHES (51 MM) MA%IMUM AND A PERIMETER DIMENSION OF 41NCHES (�02 MM� MINIMUM AND 4 81NCHES (122 MM) MAXIMUM. 5. i iB 606.3 HEIGHT. LAVATORIES AN� SINKS SHALL BE INSTALLEO WITH THE FRONT OF THE HIGHER OF THE RIM OR COUNTER SURFACE 341NCHES (864 MM) MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR OR GROUNO. 18-606.4 FAUCETS. CONTROLS FOR FAUCETS SH4LL COMPLV WITH SECTION i 1B309. HAND-OPERATED METERING FAUCETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN FOR 10 SECONDS MINIMUM ANO SHALL DELIVER MORE THAN 020 GALLONS PER CYCLE. 118-8a6 5 EXPOSED PIPES FN� SURFNCES. WATER SUPPLV qN� ORAIN PIPES UNOER LAVATORIES AND SINKS SHALL BE INSULATED OR OTHER'MSE CONFIGUREO TO PROTECT AGAINST CONTACT. THERE SHALL BE NO SHARP OR ABRASIVE SUftFACES UNDER LAVATORIES AND SINKS. 116�606 6 ADJACENT SIDE lh'ALL OR PARTITION. LAVATORIES. NMEN IOCATEO ADJNCENT TO A SIDE WALL OR PARTITION, SHAIL BE A MINIMUM OF 181NCHES (45"! MM) TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE FIXTURE. THE REQUIRED KNEE SPACE (NEGLECTING THE DIP OF THE OVERFLCIM1� SHALL BE SkOWN A MIN. OF 29" AFF AT THE FftONT EOGE OF THE COUNTER Oft LAVATORY FIXTURE (NMICHEVER PROTRUDES MORE), DECREASING TO 2]" NFF AT 8" MIN FROM THE FRONT EDGE ABD OECRFASING AGAIN TO 9" AFF AT A MIN. OF 11" 118-306.2.3 MINIMUM REQUIRED OEPTH. NMERE TOE CLEARANCE IS REQUIRED AT AN ELEMENT AS PART OF A CLFAR FLOOR SPACE, THE TOE CLEARANCE SHALL EXTEND i l INCHES (432 MM) MINIMUM UNDER THE ELEMENT. EXCEPTION�. TOE CLEARANCE SHALL EXTEND 191NCHES (483 MAXIMUM) UNDER LAVATORIES REpUIREO TO BE ACGE$$IBLE BY SEGTION � 1&213 3 4. 110��051 GENEftAL. GLEAR FLCOR OR GROUND SPACE SHALL GOMPLV WITH SECTION 118-305. 11B-305.2 FLOOR OR GROUNO SURFACES. FLOOR OR GROUND SUftFACES OF A CIEAR FLOOR OR GROUND SPACE SHALL COMPLY WITN SECTION11H3�2. CHANGES IN LEVEL ARE NOT PERMITTED. EXCEPTION�. SLOPES NOT STEEPER THAN 1:48 SHALL BE PERMITlED. 11B305 3 SIZE. THE CLEAR FLOOR OR GROUN� SPACE SHALL BE 301NCHES (]62 MM) MINIMUM BV 481NCHES (1219 MM) MINIMUM. 118-3054 KNEE ANO TOE CLFARANCE. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIE�, CLEAR FLOOR OR GROUND SPACE SHAiL BE PERMITTEO TO INCLU�E KNEE AND TOE CLEARANCE COMPLVWG WITH SECTION i 16 306. 118-305 5 POSITION. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, CLEAR FLOOR OR GROUND SPACE SHALL BE POSITIONED FOR EITHER FORWARD OR PARALLEL APPROACH TO AN ELEMEM 118-305.6 APPROACH. ONE FULL UNOBSTRUCTED SI�E OF THE CIEAR FLOOR OR GROUND SPACE SHALL A�JOIN AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OR ADJOIN ANOTHER CLEAR FLOOR OR GROUND SPACE. CLEAR FLOOR OR GROUND SPACE MAY OVERtAP AN ACCE5518LE ROUTE, UNLE55 SPECIFICALLV PROHIBITE� ELSENMERE IN THIS CHAPTER. 118-305 ] MANEUVERING CLEARANCE. VvNERE A CIEAR FLOOR Oft GROUND SPACE IS LOCATED IN AN ALCOVE OR OTHERWISE CONfINED ON ALL OR PART OF THREE SIOES, ADDITIONAL MANEUVERING CLFARANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCOROANCE WITH SEGTIONS 116-345 ].1 AND 11B-90512. iB 309 NMERE APPLICABLE, HANO OPERATEO METERING FAUCETS $HALL REMAIN OPEN FOR 10 SECONDS MINIMUM ANS SHALL OELIVER MORE THAN.24 GALLONS PER CYCLE. 118-3051.1 FORWARD APPROACH. ALCOVES SHALL BE 3G INCHES (914 MM) IMDE MINIMUM NMERE THE DEPTH E%CEEOS 241NCHES (610 Mtv�. 11B�305 ] 2 PARALLELAPPROACH. ALCOVES $HALL BE 601NCHES (1524 MM) WIDE MINIMUM WHERETHE �EPTFi EXCEE05151NCHES (361 Mh1). 11B�8023 OPERAOLE PAftTS.OPERA6LE PARTS SHALL COMPLY WITH SEGTION 110309. THE FLOW OF WATER SHALL HEACTIVATEO BV A MANUALLY OPERATED SVSTEM THAT IS FRONT MOUNTEO OR $I�E MOUNTEO ANO LOCATED V✓�THIN fi INCHES (152 MMJ OF THE FROM EDGE OF THE FOUNTAIN OR AN AUTOMATIC ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED DEVIGE 118-60245POUTHEIGHT.SPOUTOUTLETSSHALLBE36 WCHES 914MM MA%IMUMFBOVETHEFlNISHFLOORORGROUNO. ( ) 118-802 5 SPOUT LOCATION. THE SPOUT SHAL� BE LOCATED 15 1NCHE5 (381 MM) MINtMUM FROM THE VERTICAL SUPPORT AND 51NCHE5 (12] MM)1AAXIMl1M FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE UNIT, INCLUDING 9UMPERS. 11 B-fi02 6 WATER F�OW. THE SPOUT SHALL PROVIDE A FLOW OF WATER 41NCHES (102 MM) HIGH MINIMUM ANO SHALL BE LOCATE� 5 INCHES (12] MM) MAXIMUM FROM THE FRONT OF THE UNIT. THE ANGLE OF THE LM1'ATER STREAM SHAIL BE MEASURED HORI20NTALLY ftELATNE TO THE FRONT FACE OF THE UNIT. WHERE SPOUTS ARE LOCATED LESS THAN 31NCHE5 (]6 MM) OF hIE FRONT OF THE UNIT, THE ANG! E OF?HEN'ATER STREAM SH4L� BE 34 DEGREES Mi%IMUM. NMERE SPOUiSARE LOC4TE�� 9ER1'EEN? I FR � T^ T F"kIT TH Fh F THE N'ATER TR;AM � W;LL �E 15'J��4cE5 M:.XiMU4 INCHES ]6 MM AND 5 INGHES 12] M A M4%IMt1M FROM THE CN vF M_ � . E GLE C 5 ., ( ) ( ) 11B-6�2 ] DRINKING F�UNTAINS FCR STANDING �ERSONS. SPOU' CUTLETS CF �RINKING FCUNTAINS Fvr� ST,�NDING PE.450N5 SHAiL BE 381NCHE5 (365 MM) MINIMUM:.fv� 43 INCHES (1092 MM) MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR OR GROUN�. 11B-6028 DEPTH. WALL-AND POST-MOUNTED CANTLEVERED DRINKING FOUNTAINS SHALL BE 18 MCHES (45] MM) MINIMUM AND 191NCHES (463 MM) MAXIMUh11N OEPTH. 11 B-602 9 PEDESTRIAN PROiECTION. A�L �RINKING FOUNTAINS SHALL EITHER BE LOCqTEO COMPLETELV WITHIN ALCOVES, POSITIONEO COMPLETELV BETWEEN WING WALLS, OR OTHERWISE POSITIONED 50 AS NOT TO ENCROACH INTO PEOESTRIAN WAYS. THE PROTECTEO AREAWITHIN 41MICH N �RINKING FCl1NTAIN IS LOCATED SHALL BE 32 INCHES (813 MM) WIDE MINIMUM AND i81NCHES (45l MM) DEEP MINIMUM, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 118305.]. WiiEN USED, WING WALLS OR BARRIERS SHALL PROJECT HORIZONTALLV AT LEASTAS FAR AS THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND TO WITHIN 61NCHES (152 MM) VERTICAILV FROM THE FLOOR OR GROUND SURFACE. 6. A CLEAR FLOOR SPACE OF NOT LESS THAN 30" WIDE AND 48" LONG SHALL BE PROVIDED AT EACH WATER COOLER FOR THE USE OF THE OISABLED. THE WATER COOLER UNIT SHFLL HAVE A KNEE CLEARANCE THAT IS AT LFAST 2T' HIGH AN� 1]"�19" OEEP. SPONTS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 36" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR TO THE SPOUT OURET. ]. WHERE MIRRORS PRE PROVIDE�, AT LEAST ONE SHALL BE INSTALLE� WITH THE BOTTOM EDGE OF THE REFLECTING $URFACE NO HIGHER TMAN 40" ABOVE THE FINISHED FI OOR. e. NMEREPAPERTOWEI�ISPENSERSANDDISPOSALFl%TURESAREPROVIDED,ATLEFSTONESHNLLBEINSTALLE�IMTHTHEOPERABLEPARTSOFTHEDISPENSERSAT MAXIMUM OF 40" ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOft. 9. NMERE TOILET PAPER DISPENSERS ARE PROVIDED AT LEAST ONE SHAIL BE INSTALLED IMTHIN P.EACH UN�ER THE GRHO BAR PER 110-604 "! AN019" MAXIMUM AFF TO WHERE THE TISSUES DISPENSES. 10. CONTROLS AND SVNTCHES ON WALLS ARE TO 0E PLACE� A MA%IMUM OF 48" ABOVE THE FINISH fL00R. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES ON WALLS SHALL BE PLACED NO LESS THAN 15' A60VE THE FINISH FLOOR. DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE HIGHEST OPERABLE PART OF CONTROLS AND THE LOWEST OPERABLE PART OF CONTROLS AN� THE �O WEST OPERABLE PART OF RECEPTACLES. 11. AT EXITS SERVING A REpUIRED ACCES518LE SPACE BUT NOT PROVIOING AN APPROVE� ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL HAVE A DIRECTIONAL SIGN COMPLVING WITH THE VISUAL CHARCTER PROVISIONS OF 118-]03 5 THAT INDICHTES THE LOCATION OF OhiER MEANS OF EGRESS ANO NMICH OF THOSE AREACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS. ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION LEASE LINE �-NUMBER WIN�OW MARKER -NUMBER KEVED NOTE +X� X� LEVEL DATUM � � NOTEARROW � REVISION ( y )_.y PARTITION TAG �/ XX X FINISH TAG _ ELEVATION TAG tiAw� S SECTION?AG 1/A� � DETAIL TAG 1lAx� �^---1� PlANOETAIL '- AREA DETAILED � EXISTING DOOR - SEE 000RscHEouLEFOR NEW WORK NEW OOOR DOOR DESIGNATION # NUMBER COLUMN OESIGNATION �ENTERLIN ROOM NUMBER F�OOR � ROOM �ESIGNATION G C. TO PROVIOE RESTROOM SIGN WITH RAISED AND BRNILLE CHARACTERS AND FICTORIAL SYMBOL SIGN AT CORRIDOR SIDE GF TOILET ROGM DOOR AS PER STATE AND LOCAL ACCESSIBILITY CODE. A. 80Ti0M OF TACTILE CHARACTERS SHALL BE MWMED BEPNEEN 48" ANO fi0" A.F.F. F L E HA l 9E M MED BcTWEEN 68" A.F F. B. 80TTOM 0 BRAI L S L OU C. SIGN TO BE SURFACE MOUNTeO ON THE WALL ADJFCENT TO THE LATCH SIDE OF THE DGOR. L RA �N N- LAREFINISH. 0. SIGNS SHALL BE IN CONTRASTING CO 0 N 0 G � � II ry L �t � �O � O � � 1 2 � � � � � �/� � AB1 N�1 NOTE LOCATE DEVICES ON SPME WALL AS D�R, U.O.IJ. � �� .. .�..... * �I � � STROBE (AS APPLICABL� 1HERMOSTATORIMERCGM LIGHT SWITCHES DIMMERS. POWER AND TREPHONE RECEPTACLE ETC. CREDENZF OR COUMER. REFER TO ELEVATIONiDEiAILS FINISH FLOOR TVPICAL LOCAT70N FOR OUTLETS, SWITCHES ANO � THERMOSTATS ETC.ATCREDENZA OR COUNTERTOP TY�'ICAL MOUNTING HEIGHTS 2 SCALE N T 5 � TVPICAL WALL �Y �C PHNELJOINT E�. EQ EQ EQ. � ' � POWERANDTELEPHONE �'. � RECEPTACLE ANU CLUSTER �; , VERTICALLY MOUNTE�, c„ � CEMERE�BETWEENPANEL �=�� JOINTS � u �' ii i'a... - ; �. �'. FiNiSH FLOOR TYPICAL LOCATION FOR POWER AND /1 TELEPHONE OUTLETS AT WALL OR COLUMN I . �{- FIRE ALARM (SPENKERiSTROBE . / I OR STP.OBE ONLY) -_ U - FIRE FXTINGUISHER CABINET .......... _ .. � � �n. �� FlRE EXTINGUISHER FINISH FLOOR NPICAL LOCATION FOR ONE OR TWO MOUNTED � fIRE ALARM DEVICES / VISUAL ALARM FEC � racn�E sicN NOTEs. } E E IT R TE� i� w�rH �aaz nNo sHau ee oua�raareo , I r of ��y� �� o � INBRAI�LECOMPLYINGN9TH703.?. j � RAISE� CHAfLiCTERS SHALL BE \ INSTALLED IN ACCORDHNCE WITH 703.4. (7092) �2. BRAILLESHALLBECONTRACTE6 � � �� (GRADE2)ANDSHALLCOMPLYVtYT4 m- � 703.3 ANG 703.4. (703.3) �g �3. BRAILLESHALL6EPOSITIONED6ELOW HEIq33 Of RAISED THE CORRESPON�IN6 TEXT. IF i tXT I S CNA'WCTERS POSITION OF BRA�LE i MilLT6uNED, eRAILLE SHALL BE PLACE� BELOLVTHE ENTIRE TEX' � ( 70332 1 4. PI,^,TOGRAMSSHALLHAVEAFIE LD 4S� c HEIGHTOF6INCHE.. 150MPo1 MNIA - UM. � ( ) � CHFRACTERS AND BRAILLE SHAu. NOT � BELOCATEDINTHEPICTOGRhMFtEL�. � CENTERED i ��6�1� 18� ON TACiILE �� PICTOGRAMS AND THEIR FIELD SNALL MIN. CHARACTERS w1VEANON-GLAREFINISH. PICTOGRAMS SHALL CONTRAST \19TH iCICATION Of TACiILE $IGNS AT DOORS THEIR FIELD UNTH EITHER A LIGHF i PICTOGRAMONADARKFlELDORA �ARK PICTOGRAM ON A LIGHT FIFSD. (703.62) 60" AFF��fi. EXITSIGNSCOMPLYIN6WITHSECTION 7A�F .��°`��""-Ea MAXq� 11B-703ANDINACCORDANCCIh:I}i 48' nrF duwr.crms � SEC. ioii n a]T: MIN. '°""""� { I TACTILE CNARACiER HEIGH7 ABOVE F100R �TAC77LE SIGNS c s u� ,�� THIS A21�NING IS A REPRESENTATIVE SUMMARY OF THE RE^AIIREMENTS OF THE ADA STANDARDS THAT AWY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION ANO CLEAR.NCES ARE NOT NOTED ON THE ORA4NNGS, CONSTRUCTTOTHECLEARANCESAND TOLEWWCES SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. WHERE ORAIMNG'J SPECIf ICALLY IN�ICHTE DIFFERENT Ci2 CONFLiCTING MFORMATION TO THE STAN�NRDS DEPIC7EG ON THIS SHEET, CONSTRUCT USING THE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENT OR CONTACT THE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION �ACCESSIBLE GUIOELINES t�scua. +o._ NOTE'. DASHEO LINES INDICATES �IMENSIONAL UNDERLAVATORYENCLOSURE. 25" MA% � �CLEAR � � � FLOOR � ; LSPACE � - - I d8 . 'r MIN. � PLAN AT LAVATORY �\ SI�E ELEVATION AT WATER CLOSET F SI�E ELEVATION AT WATER CLOSET OPPOSITE SIDE VIEW NOTE'. FIXTURE SH04VN FOR ILLUSTftATION PURPOSE ONLY. SEE SHEET A502 AND P W MBING FOR ACTUAL FIXTURE TYPE. TOILET PAPER . DISPENSER ( BELOW GRAB BAR ) 36"�4" MIRROR HANGORYER IN �. ;iEDR41NAND HC �. �,VF.TER LWES _ m � a � BELCWLAVATOR � > � _;SI '_' " '_1 18 � FRONT ELEVATION AT tAVATORV TOILET PAPER � DISPENSER (BELOWGRAB � g,. .. BAR) z MIN. � .�1_:. F-� � >>. it fi" MIN�AX. TOE CLR. i7-25' XKNEEC . � SIDEELEVATIONATDRMKINGFOUNTAIN TYPICAL PLUMBING ELEMENTS AND FACILITIES SCALE N T.S. 1/4" (MAX.) (A) VERTICAL CHANGE IN LEVEL V4" V2�� (MAX. ) (MAX. ) 2 � (B) BEVELED CHANGE IN LEVEL VERTICAL CHANGES IN LEVEL'. CHANGES IN LEVEL GREATER THAN 1!4 INGH (64 MM) IN HEIGHT AND NOT MORE THAN 12 INGH (13MM) MAXIMUM IN HEIGHT SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NOT STEEPER THAN 12. TYP. TRANSITION DETAIL SCALe: N.T.S. 8" �DOOR FRpME EDGE STROBE (AS APPLICNBLE) � THERMOSTAT, WTERCOM19 OR SECOND RGW OF RECEPTACLES CEMER TO CLUSTER (WHEN US!N6 �IMMERS. LOCATE THERMOSTAT AT OPPOSRE SIDF OF DOOR) � r ��r LIGH. SWT.,H DIMMERS EGReSSBUTTON. INTERCOM B TTON CARD READER ETC. U Ifl.nnl. � . il i I I i II � CLUSTER (SEE PLAN FOR QUHMItt OF EACH � CLUSTER) �OOR LEVER, PULL �jl- WALLOUTLET ' i- FlNISH �fL00R 38"MIN. 12„ MIN. �' � ��,-�a,. � FRONT ELEVATION AT WATER CLOSET LT 48" �..: ,:, MIN. ,;�:.�..,, � CLEAR �:.,,i � � ( FLOOR L SPACE � 5" 75 MA MIN � PLAN AT DRiNKING FOUNTAIN FORWARDAPPROACH 30" MIN. � � I CLEAR ` =`� o � I FLOOR I SPACE c i �&I �s vz �_�i� I_ _ J' MAX �\ PLAN AT DRINKING FOUNTAIN SIDE APPROACH TYPICAL ABBREVIATIONS ABOVE F81 FURNISHANOINSTALL ACCOUSTICAL CEILING TI�E FL. FLOOR AMERICANSIMTHDISABILITIESACT F.F. FACEOFFINISH ABOVE FINISH FLOOR F.S. FACE OF STU� AMERICANSOCIETYFORTESTINGANDMATERIqLS F.V. FIELDVERIFY CONCReTE DRINK FOUNTAIN octnMSPou'r EOUAL FI%TURE CONTRACTOR HM LL. P L PLASTIC LAMINATE RD RGUND REF REFRIGERATOR REFL REfLECTED R.W.L. ROOFWATERLEADER SIM. SIMIAR SUSP. SUSPENDEG TVP. TYNIGAL u�. uNOERwuirER�sueow�TORr U N.O. UN�E55 NOTEO OTHEftWISE WC 7 1i2" MIN. AN� MNX. 7, BENDING STRESS IN GWjR&4R OR ScAT INDUCED BY THE 3. SHEhR fORCE INOUCED INA FASTENER OR MOUNTING DEVICE 5/8"GW.BD. MAXIMUMBENDIN6MOMEh"IfROMTHEAPPLICAT10NOF250 FR^�,BA1FiEAPPLICATI0NOF250LBFSHALL6ELES5THANTHE IBFSHALLBELESSTHANit1EALLOYJA8LE5TRES5FORTHE ALLC`NABLEEATERALLOADOFEITHERTHEFASTENEROR 1 114" TO 1 1 i2" MATERIAI OF THE GRAB &W OR SEAT. MCUN�ING �EVICE OR THE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE FRT WJOD 6LOCKING N�MiNAL LhHATEVER IS?HE SMALLER ALLOWABLE LOAD. DIAMEifR (T�PJ 2 SHFAR STRESS INDt10EG�A GRAB 9AR OR SEAT BY THE APPLICATIONOF250LBfS�1LLBELESSTHANTHEALLOWABLE 4. TF3�SILEFORCEINDUCEDINAFASTENERBYAOIRECTTENSION SHEARSTRESSFORTHE3�L�?ERIAL�THEGRABBARORSEAT. FORCEOF250LBFPWSTHEMAX.MOMENTFROMTHE . IF THE CONNECTION BE?:4EEN THE vRAB BAR OR SEAT AN� R'S PPft1CAT10N OF 250 LBF. SHALL BE LESSTHAN THE ALLOWABLE MOUNTING BRACKET OR D�R SUPPORT IS CONSIDERED TO V✓itiURFWNL LOAD BETWEEN TFIE FPSTENER ANO THE BEFULLYRESTRAINEO,ingNDIRECTANDTOR510NAL5HEAR SUPPORTINGSTRUCiURE. STRESSES SHALL BE TOT�tED FOR?HE COMBINE� SHEAR STRESS, NMICH SHALL I�.T EXCEEC THE AL�OWAB�E SHEAR STRESS. �TYPICAL GRAB BAR DETAIL �.% J SCALE'. 1/i6" = i'-0" 52E OF TURNING SPACE: THE MINIMUM SPACE RE�UIRED FOR A STANDARD WNEELCHAIR TO MAKE A 180-0EGREE TURN IS A CLEAR SPACE OF A 60 iNCH OIAMETER OR A T-SHAFED SPACE. REFER TO THE TURNING SPACE DETAILS BELOW. �JOOR SWING'. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, �QORS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO SVNNG INTO TURNING SPACES. 5,�.. � � '-0" 3'-0" 0" (A) CIRCULAR TURNING SPACE �) T-SHAPE� TURNWG SPACE 54" �I � � �r% _ '� FRONTAPPROACH. LATCH APPROAGH, PVSH SIDE PU�LSIDE CLOSER ANDLATGH 6a P°�n s�ae 6b r�n s�ae Q• 1 1 � ♦ � � � �� : �3 •�` • l� _ ,�-�' � 1 �I 1 il= 1/ It/ 1 I a �_ + � ?' , 1\ �'�1\ 1�I �I�I ,' � III�'t�l ii�lu �iu<��- yN`iti;�- i t I: � �' TYPICAL ACCESSIBILITY REACH CLEARANCES SCALE: N.T.S. N � I�I, �� i � . � <X9FRP�ANEiBFIGE � A�AHILCWDftINKING FODUTlJN ADA �AN=�PR��Fo�„A� (PlhTI4UMVINVL) ADA - HI-LO DRINKiNG FOUNTAIN SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" P-� i 1'-51/2' ._ 1'-511T' � I � � ! ADA _ � �� 0 S A K E R E I N D E R 5 M A A R C H I T E C T 5450 E. High Street, Suite 200 Scottsdole, Arizona SSD54 p: 480.515.5123 f: 602.513J193 www.sra360.com 5E� AR�H �F,� �pM RE/� ��- 2 � s * 02-02-2018 ? yT REN: �� o Op �A�\ 0 U i d � � :3 �� ! { �e; �� 5C e � p �'i �� C t�s �'B � ^�q � _ �� + �'��.g .. �� 5�� d �e� o �� k �� o�� O VO WO Q Q� � Q �y�� U r! Q w � �/ � � V az PJ �' � �� m � �a O a � � date: 02/02/18 issued for: DESIGN REVIEW revision date: f10.: job no.: 17-072 sheet title: ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS sheet no.: G002 TYPICAL TACTILE SIGNAGE 1 SCALE N T S. TVPICAL LOCATION FOR LIGHTSWITCHES, A DIMMERS =GRESS BUTTONS,THERMOSTATS,ETC. � � 8 l� � _ MI T(��: -'�a: KNEECLCAR:�NCE� 1, �"o'� � � p SIDE ELEVATION AT LAVATORV I � NEW EXTENDED i PARAPETBEYOND� I � � Zo'-e" TO.PARAPET � � �� . . A9 P1 / 13' 4 \ B.O. CANOPY � -' ' — '— v NEWCANOPY � ,, ��. �� E2 � �� P3 � NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 134*/ BO.EXISTING �� .. .�.. ...-�..:�� N CANOPY PZ � - - ..� . I ,� v � � � T �P2 �, , �t-�. --� ' � i i � -`� � : . . ... � : i % . i . � _ . � _ . .._. iP3 I � � �A3 �.,�, . ... -� ;I;� � . . � TRASH COMPACTOR ' � ��' . I . .I'�. LOCATION (BEYONO) NEW LOADING DOCKS WITH NEW ROLL-UP DOORS I I � i � � � EXISTING ROOF I NEW EXTENDED . .. ........ . � BEYOND ... . . . ... .. .. . . ..... . . ... . .. ... . _ . .. .. .. ..... ... . . PARAPET .. _ ... . . . . _ . I I � P1 � �1 � . , . .. _ . �,: I i lf-'�:If�lf�l.... .,.. ��I : .{ -- �PZ � ��E.I .. ....... .._. ....� .. �� ... ._.. �.......I . - �� . ... �' . , I�I�..w . a_�.� ��I P3 I I Existing Window system to be replaced, match existing NEW CANOPY - NEW EXTENDED PARAPET x NEW PILASTER I I I I � i i �i I I I I i i I ( BEYONO ROOFI I i EXISTING I � .__ .. l ...... I TO ROEMAIN I � ..... I .. ...... I 1 u P4 I I' Ii EAST ELEVATION (FOR REFERENCE ONL SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" R REFERENCE ONL ----------------------- I I I I ' I � � I I I I i � i ' i EXISTING I I I EXISTING WALL I ' �OPY LIGHTING.�TYP ....... . ... � .... .... 1 REVEAL ..... I ; ...... .... � I _ i _ i ' � i � �' � ,�. � p� � Pi � � � �.�..L � � _ . _�_ � _ , , _ _. __ _ .__ ._ . __ .. i I I PZ I P2 I; �� i i, i i � i ....__ _... _. ... .. ...... . ... ... . . ,. I:,� �.I; P2 � ..i P3 �I � ._ . i �....` � � P� I EXISTING BOLLAR�S I P4 I I i NEW ROLLL'P �700RI — AND FIRE RISER PIPES . � IvEW ALTOMATIC OOOR SLIDER �Ex��;�;�� -,eva�;�n�; S�: `c`i`oi �iG'V. 4`,�ti;Y �� `�2iiV "C[c�,k/ - T�Q!'�`'tCc�.��(`�JCiS; C',I1PU Ca�t�pY� �� F ��ad��a °t7�ck: �� `�as� v�r��;4s�r W�II: :�� ri�lc'�,S�E,'€'S �7 �� G'�e'?i i iLn�i�}t�: ; ,�� 1 �� i J� i ��YJ�� = J:l�/7 % '""'""__'_"__________'__________ 1 � � i � NEWEXTENDED I PARAPET i za r T.O.PARAPET , pl� � 1 I � i NEW PARAPET BEYOND I_ _._ �_ �_.- _ _ 1 A303 __________________'________'__'__'1_'_'_"__"'_'______________________' . 1 � � � � � 1� � � � � � � � , � I 35'-0" A.F.F. I I I I I I I I . T.O. TOWER � i �� REFURBISH EXISTING ' ' '� � I I CANOPY TO REMAIN � - � I I EXISTING WALL I I I I EXISTING ROOF I EXISTING WALL I I Pl � . .. __. ..... REVEAL i ._.. ..._ ._ .... _ i BEYOND ... REVEAL. ....... ... i ,_ __._�e..v e ,... s — �. .. . . . � ....-� ..,.. .. � � ��5� I ( .._ .I._. _ I .. I.._.._ . I ..... ..._.-_ ..I. . .__I I � ..........._. � , � ( '� ia�-o, ti � i— . 1 � � �� ; � �� Pi �` °�i ��' �' T.O.NEWGANOPY , '.' .• � T � I; j I. i i i: (MATCH EXISTING � � �� ' � � , ,, CANOPY) P3 �� _—� '— I �I� Ia .� •I. ',.I! iI' P2 I' I�, I' �.I! p• 53 � . .l �I / / \ \ . i�. I .I �I I�. ;I< _ � � z�l � � � rl: 31: ,{ .I� '..I. ,I: P3 I_: I�. I. .I, FIN.FLOOR �� I �� _--' I NEWAUTOMATIC EXISTINGGA�METER I NEWDC�OR I I I I I I STOREFRONT SLIDING DOORS � """"""""'__"' _'_"""__""""""""""'""__"'__""""""""""""_"'_"""""�• WEST ELEVATION (FOR REFERENCE ONL SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" i IN-FILL AREAS TO BE PAINTED SOUTH E�EVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" I � .. .-.:._ -..... I � �, �.__ _ __- _.__.. I � � _ i i I REFERENCE ONL I I � � _._._ �I I I i � �EXISTING ROOF BEYOND � I � __. _.. --� - . - —___ � � ��.kl�?i�i:�3 �i:',4`c.'a�=�)si�; �;''. i��Ut{�'2 �i�V, �,.�?{)..�i. `...`�'i� I Q �' iv�w �(ev - rr,�dific�t's�;��: NEW Sh�iAGE � � NEW PIL?.STER �� o�A��, Pa F�c��t G�no�Y 1.05=% �F �_ _: ..�.� .� _ _- � � �I � _ -.. � . �asfers. 460 �F `�—� � � X�C3iCGC1 ��C�:��G�� ,� �� '� � ' �� ;. Erit�y �cs�rs {.r�fiii}: �?� S� _._ � � � � . . �r. � � " ��3?c'�� i`�G'C1: '�,��J� �� .�� . . . � . � E2 �: � � P4 � . t,� � �:� 3: 1'-� '� � �f __.�. ��._ _ � � � 14 0"/`� � T.O. NEW CANOPY I ' (MATCH EXISTING � � P3 � � � � CANOPY) � � ; � � o-o. FIN. FLOOR I P4 I � � � S2 ' NEW PILASTER i � NEW PILASTER �'EW SAFETY � I RAILS AND RAMP � i 1 I P .� ro.New SCREEN I � � IN-FILLAREAS I TRASHCOMPACTOR Y� TO BE PAINTED DOOR TRASH COMPnCTOR LOCATION �xistin� Eievation� 5�. �NeS� E€�'J. 5:16� S�- �ie��= �Eev m�c�;ficaiic��,s; �ntry Gal�opy: 1,�?5�l �� ?��er E��er�t Side: 477 SF ��,i`din� r�m�ved; .2t� �� 'I�i�St�!"S: �7 u!- ..�..�'iCli (Y?C��. �.L�^ Jt �f�+� f '� S L'�i = �iS��t3 E=`�i�'��r�� c�._i�`2/c�C�C!li��u a5i-. �c��'?�� L�, ��, �i�� Si= N�uv El�v - m�difs`cati�r�s: 1 ��ta? t�I�d: S.C?3r SF ��3z!2�104 - 35°% ----------------------------------------------------------------. ! , I i� , � i I _ i „A3p2 � PAR4PET WALLL � I "�� " T+ BEYOND � . .,. . � 24'-8" /j �, . . . _`_. . _ _ . _ :_ . .., .. � � . T.O. PARAPET ! zo-�� .... � . ... , T.O. PARAPET � r,-r � � . . .. _ . . � ��xistir7c �lev�tior�� F: � ��c��#h E€�v. 6;�� 1 SF � � N�w E1ev - m�d�ficatic�ns: � Tr��h c�rr�patcr �,��;l: 5�� F irf�E� qal�-up C}o�rs: �16 SF �tE`.��t�F�: � �� d I �exisriNc�zo�-�o� .i-� �T.,�c�( �`i�i�U: 1,�� i �� T.O_PARAPET � ��; ��7'��1�]b°!� �. +F-'13'd' i,F..a....a. I � �'B.O.EXISTING � CANOPY STEWART + REINDERSMOA ARCHITECTURE, P�LC 5450 E. Hi9h Sireet. Suite 2oa Phoenix. Arizona 85054 p'. 480.515.5123 www.sra360.com U �0 O � U 3� �� . ��y� x� s �� `� � "� s 9�@� �+�� .. ., . �_�s�'s � O V � � � U �•' r! � � a C� Z �/'�/ O LL_ Q �� m Q� � U N �o a 02/06/18 90% REVIEW date: �— Ijob no.: 17-072 shee��i��OR ELEVATIONS (FQR REFERENCE ONLY) sheet no.: A301 L��/"U ` �� vVV�"U ` ��V / �� ; . _ . ...._ , '_ ` ` �� EXISTIN6 TREE TO REMRIN • - � �";\ y_ - 1\ � I. NNLGH: A UNIFOi2M T+iREE INGH GOVERING O� l^IALK-ON MULGH, SHALL BE u� �_i INSTALLED IN ALL AR£AS TO SE PLANTED. 1 � EXISTING TREE TO BE REMO�lED �, �p�pGp�R: GROl1NIJG0�/ER SHALL BE PRO�CI�D UP TO THE '>; WATERING BASIN OF ALL 'fREES AND SHRUBS. '� ❑. PROPOSED ?REE 3. E?CISTIN6 IRRI6ATION SYSTEM: EXISTING IRRIGAT�CN SYSTEM SHALL BE i RESTORED TO A GO�IDITION SUGH THAT IT GAN S(�TAIN THE PROPOSED � � SHRUB MA55 PLANTINGS. ; _yl � � 3 �.� � ..�T-�--^"'"""�,'.�...�.. � � _ �---�� _ PLANT LlST , ,� ��,�� ,_�-- .. �,'� I ",._...-.-x---"`"'�`........ ABBREV. BOTANIGHL NAME GOMMON NAME .. �:L �,u u i 4't' � -�� "`� � n. , . .. n'�� i �., .;>R . I . — —_ — — —>m � � �5 --� - MA6 GRA MAGNOLIA 6RANDIPLORA SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA � _��- ' - ��- -' _..._ _ " 'SAMUEL SOMMER' � _ . _ . _ . . _--' � :_ __ � - SFfR11B5 ` _ PRONT SET BAGK._ ` � - __ _.. _ _ •_ — _ _ , ` � -,; — ~ `� � � � �� GOIZ DUS GOi2REA 'DUSKY BELLS' RED AUSTRALIAN FUGHSIA �,;� ` � � ��s� ��- . , I_5� R DU5 ` 54 � LO� M LOFI � _ FG o 3 � � ., Q � , Q � .-�-� - \ 3 PHO MAO LOM LON LOMATdDRA LONGIPOLIA 'BREEZE' DWARF MAT RUSH # ��u,�.� PHO MAO PHORMIUM 'MAORI QUEEN' NEW ZEALAND FLAX � i ;� - _ � . � / �1 �� _ ' _ � E�F'�:NIPIDGOVERS � � " H � GEANOTHUS GRISEUS HORIZONTALIS DIAMOND HEI6HT5 GARMEL ;% �. 'DIAMOND HEIGHTS' GREEPER � �� ' � � , 5 � PHO MAO � � � s::Y �'> i)=' ;� Fu1 ;}i i:i)i'� 1�iL)5 f i>: LMIV�7C/'1rG C/1LVVLA 1 MA7 \ ; iD'�. 2£)13-C)ti�a�.3 ij r \' � � \ ?1f'ti: CI25-2"77...;}'i0 �� '' '� � PRONT SET BAGK LANDSGAPING: 5,736 SF \, ..\\ \ i ' � � `� � � � TOTAL SITE LAh(DSGAPING: II�00 5P � , '. vUt��?v<>€ ; a st�; vo= � as 3��- fir �� a�-nr.; ; g; 41 v�; �L LVI"I LVIV > :, � , �', �< 7 PHO MAO �_. i II GOR DUS i F2 LOM LON / 1 \ 12 GOR DUS z �V�. _ � � �` ' , ,. _.. 3.;.... _ ....__- - _ � � � x °;z _,. tc�s � t:!4; 'e 1�'C!.:. + -'3 3 ,� �y / `'Ct . 6 Ph+� O MAO � \ � �'ORi�EC3�: GF t1T 45 t» �:45-qEi t- � , ._ `'� .rt'! �..�.a � 51GN SY OThf�i25 �;'. �.�., �� i 2 MAG GRA 24 GOR DUS � 18 25IGOR DUS 55ILOM LON 56 ADRIAN ROAD � (60' WIDTH) h�' _.. � k. . .. t" � 51ZE SPAGIN6 24" BOX AS S+iOWN I GA4.LON 4'-O" O.G. I GALLON 3'-O" O.G. 5 GALLON 4'-O" O.G. I GALLON 5'-O" O.G. - -_�� ; � .<*-� ; -��--- - -�- �� i � - �---� � -�- � � � \ . _...---- h �� ',., � ...i ..._"_' `_" ` � l ' . .` .___.___'_i " �� k ___. < � \ _-..�__ . � ' � 3 � i � i� -- , , , � .. i .._.__—� . ��._." � � V �s � `>..\\�.�.�. 1�..'��:, `1..�,.-�..\.. -_'____'_'_-_y _.. -- --- - ---s' _ � __ � i �` i �' y,� — ----! -- �_.. 4 ' � � -� � 1 _--- _ __ � ; � ii � -- ; _-- --- � � _ � ; � ' � --- —_ � T _ �-- ,� ,� .._. „ ,z , , , ,� � 2 DUS i 0 10' 20' 40' OWNER: FRANK EDWARDS COMPANY WC. 7565 ADRIAN ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94070 650-692-2347 • 4� YEARS idl�flde� AS50436�5 SSO �S Wd �pgnrclum�3ue �� ,�3��ro Su4 133 &eli�rq CA 94010 T 65Q375.1313 F6503943290 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� &..+ , � . $-� 8�� .� ?�� = s � � � � � � �s i� � ; � r � � i'�. , � � o „ � z ;s� � � o � � f% � U U � �� Drowing Number. � � � `LL � � �