Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda FS - PC - 2000.07.24AGENDA CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA July 24, 2000 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. MINUTES July 10, 2000 meeting IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. FROM THE FLOOR VI. STUDY ITEMS 1. 1234 Burlingame Avenue - zoned C-1, Subarea A, Burlingame Avenue Commercial District - application for sign exception for the number of signs on the primary frontage. 2. 3 California Drive - zoned C-2, Subarea D - application for sign exception for the number of signs on a primary frontage. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a conrmissionerprior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt. 3. 340 Lorton #203, zoned C- 2, Subarea B - application for an amendment to a conditional use permit for an existing physiotherapy office (Gina LaRocca, applicant; Don Sabatini, property owner) (34 noticed) 4. 1208 Donnelly Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea B - application for a sign exception for an existing wall sign (Beverly J. Foster, applicant; Day Family Trust, property owner) (86 noticed) 5. 141 Costa Rica Avenue - zoned R-1 - application for design review for a new two-story single-family residence (Larry Morsello, property owner; James Chu, designer and applicant) (60 noticed) 6. 1825 El Camino Real - zoned R-3 - application for tentative and final parcel map for lot combination (Frank Venturelli, C&V investments, applicant and property owner) (23 noticed) VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM 7. 1108 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea A and 303/305 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea A - application for a conditional use permit amendment to increase the seating area in an existing food establishment and to expand the existing food establishment into an adjacent building (Fanny & Alexander, applicant; Lorenz Kao and Louisa Zee Kao, property owners) (36 noticed) City of Burlingame Planning Conunission Agenda Ah' i S. Commercial Design Review - Ordinance to extend design review to development in the C-1 and C-2 zones and minor corrections to the zoning code. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS . 9. 1317 Castillo Avenue - zoned R-1- design review for a first and second story addition (Alfredo Reyes, Stewart Associates, applicant and architect; and Michael & Hildy Chaple, property owners) (62 noticed) 10. 2009 Ray Drive - zoned R-1- design review for new two-story single family residence with detached 2-car garage (Denise Laugensen and Alex Beilin, owners; Robert Medan, Stewart and Associates, applicant; Robert Medan, Stewart and Associates, designer). (55 noticed) 11. 1346 De Soto Avenue - zoned R-1- application for design review for a first and second story addition to an existing two-story house (Joseph and Jennifer Addiego, property owners and applicants; JD & Associates, designer) (67 noticed). �. 12. 1532 Burlingame Avenue - zoned R-1 - application for design review and parking variance for a second story addition to an existing two-story house (Robert and Jessica Fellows, property owners and applicants; John Matthews Architects, architect) (53 noticed). 13. 1531 Vancouver Avenue - zoned R-1- application for design review and special permit for declining height envelope for construction of a new two-story single family dwelling, and special permit for the length of a new detached garage (Sean and Ann Keighran, property owners and applicants; Kotas/Pantaleoni Architects, architect) (68 noticed). 14. 1349 Vancouver Avenue - zoned R-1 - application for design review and special permit for height for a new two-story house (James Chu, applicant and designer; Ron Grove, property owner). (65 noticed) X. PLANNER REPORTS - Review of Counter Handout Design Review Submittal Checklist and Draft Commission Procedure Handout. X1. ADJOURNMENT Note. An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council until the end of the next regularly scheduled Council meeting on August 7, 2000. In order to be effective, appeals must be in writing and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of $250, which includes noticing costs. Ifthe Planning Commission's action has not been appealed or called up far review by the Council by the end of their meeting on August 7, 2000, the action becomes finaL If appeals are directed in writing to the City Clerk at City Hall prior to the close of the working day on August 7, 2000, attendance at the Council meeting is not required for setting an appeal. ACFNDA7.241nosted 7119100