HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 023-2003RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE
Resolution No. 023-2003
1301 Burlingame Avenue, APN: 029-202-060
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true
and correct copy of the document it purports
to be, the original of which is on the in my office.
Date: 03.19,03
Ll,0rrzl - .
Mar aret Monroe, City Planner
RESOLUTION APPROVING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND COMMERCIAL
DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT FOR A NEW ONE-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING
RESOLUTION 023-2003
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a mitigated
negative declaration and commercial design review amendment for a new one-story commercial building at
1301 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1 Subarea A of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area Avtar Johal
Family Trust, property owner, APN: 029-202-060;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
March 10, 2003, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and
testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and mitigated negative declaration,
per Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND-526 P and Addendum, is hereby approved.
2. Said mitigated negative declaration and commercial design review amendment are approved,
subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such mitigated negative
declaration and commercial design review amendment are as set forth in the minutes and recording of said
meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo.
I, Joseph BoJu6s, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, doKereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
held on the 10th day of March, 2003 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
Auran; Brownrigg; Kerighran; Vistica
Bojues; Keele
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Osterling
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for mitigated negative declaration and commercial design review amendment
1301Burlingame Avenue
effective March 17, 2003
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped February 18, 2003, sheets A3.0 through A3.3, with 2'-8" high x 5'-5'-4" wide gray Italian
sandstone slabs, a recessed storefront windows and frameless glass doors along Burlingame Avenue,
and 45'-4" length x 2'-8" height display window along Park Road, and a 5' width x 5'-4" height
clerestory window along Park Road; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building
shall require and amendment to this permit;
2. that the project shall obtain Planning Commission commercial design review approval before
demolition of the existing structure (except for asbestos removal or reconstruction) or construction
of the new building takes place on the site;
that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required
to receive a permit from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District prior to issuance of a
demolition permit from the Building Department; and that the applicant shall comply with all
requirements of the permit;
4. that any changes to the size or envelope or approved of building, which would include adding or
enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the
roof height or pitch, shall be subject to commercial design review;
that the conditions of the Fire Marshal's, Building Official's and Recycling Specialist's July 29, 2002,
memos and the conditions of the City Engineer's August 6, 2002, September 10, 2002 and October 28,
2002 memos shall be met;
6. that the demolition and construction on the site shall follow the construction logistics plan date
stamped June 29, 2001, and the memo and diagrams regarding construction staging and date stamped
September 4, 2002, and demolition and site construction plans date stamped October 22, 2002;
that the debris box in the alley shall be limited to a 10' x 24' debris box, and shall only be in place
for a two week period during demolition, and the alley and fire lane shall not be completely
blocked, there shall be adequate space for a vehicle to maneuver around the debris box; and that
flagmen shall be available for traffic control while the debris box is in place;
8. that an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department for the
scaffolding in the public right-of-way along Burlingame Avenue and Park Road;
9. that the pedestrian access provided along Burlingame Avenue and Park Road shall not block any
on -street parking spaces;
10. that employee vehicles shall not be parked in Lot J;
11. that truck access to the site shall not use Burlingame Avenue or California Drive, trucks shall
access the site from Howard and the City Hall Lane alley, access from US 101 to the site shall be
via Carolan Avenue;
page-2
Conditions of approval for mitigated negative declaration and commercial design review amendment
1301Burlingame Avenue
effective March 17, 2003
12. that no construction that would impact the public right-of-way (such as scaffolding, pedestrian
barricades, truck loading and unloading and parking reductions) shall occur between November 3`a
through January 5`"; construction solely within the building may occur during this time as long as
the public alley and right of way are not impacted or blocked;
13. that all construction shall be done in accordance with the California Building Code requirements
as amended by the City of Burlingame, and limits to hours of construction imposed by the City of
Burlingame Municipal Code; these hours are between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, 9:00
a.m, and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. There shall be no
construction on Sundays or holidays and no heavy equipment operation or hauling shall be
permitted on weekends or holidays;
14. that the method of construction and materials used in construction shall insure that the interior
noise level within the building does not exceed 45 dBA;
15. that the contractor shall submit the "Recycling and Waste Reduction" form to the building
department to be approved by the Chief Building Official that demonstrates how 60 percent of
construction demolition material will be diverted from the waste stream and the applicant shall be
required to implement this plan;
16. that the contractor shall prepare, have approved and shall implement a plan that insures that all
runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shall meet National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards;
17. that should any cultural resources be discovered during construction, all work shall be halted until
they are fully investigated by a professional accepted as qualified by the City Planner and the
recommendations of the expert have been executed to the satisfaction of the City;
18. that all signage on the site shall require a separate application for a sign permit; and
19. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire
Code, 1998 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
IROUTING FORM
DATE: February 21, 2003
TO: _City Engineer
✓ Chief Building Official
_Fire Marshal
_Recycling Specialist
_Sr. Landscape Inspector
_City Attorney
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Request for commercial design review amendment to change exterior materials and
windows and raise parapet height at 1301 Burlingame Avenue, zoned C-1, Subarea A,
APN: 029-202-060.
STAFF REVIEW: Monday, February 24, 2003
GnGj�Yr-EP�e evO PW Lwt(10 C[yk�LtJ
Reviewed Date of Comments: 47