HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 085-2003M
Planning Department
City of Burlingame
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE
Resolution No. 085-2003
1327 Carlos Avenue, APN: 027-191-050
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true
and correct copy of the document it purports
to be, the original of which is on file in my office.
Date: 9/29/03
MYrjaret Monroe, Ct y Planner
RESOLUTION 085-2003
RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DESIGN REVIEW
RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that:
WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for desi
review for a new two-story house with a detached garage at 1327 Carlos Avenue, zoned R-1, Brian Roche,
property owner, APN: 027-191-050;
WHEREAS, said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on
September 22, 2003, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials
and testimony presented at said hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that:
1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments
received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the
project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per
CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15303 - Class 3- construction and location of limited
numbers of new, small facilities or structures including (a) single-family residences not in conjunction with
the building of two or more such units. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be
constructed or converted under this exemption; is hereby approved.
2. Said design review is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Findings for such design review are set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting.
3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of
the County of San Mateo.
G� K6
C w AN
Avv'A.vt Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of Se ten mber, 2003 , by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Auran; Bojues; Brownrigg; Keighran; Keele; Vistica
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
SECRETARY
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Osterling
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review.
1327 Carlos Avenue effective October 2, 2003
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department
date stamped September 10, 2003, Sheets A.1 through A.6, and L.10 ,site plan, floor plans,
building elevations and landscape plan, with the exception of the 134 SF (6-6" x 20'-6")
front porch which shall be built including the French doors as shown on the plans date
stamped August 29, 2003, with a total FAR for the house not to exceed 3,288 SF (0.54
FAR);
2. that a window shall be added on the wall above the front entry facing the street in the second
floor laundry room; the window shall be consistent in size and style with the windows
throughout the house;
that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any changes to the size or envelope
of the first or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area ofthe
structure, replacing or relocating a window (s), adding a dormer (s) or changing the roof
height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;
4. that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist, Fire Marshal, City Engineer, and Chief
Building Official's memos dated August 4, 2003 shall be met;
5. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the
property comers, set the building envelope;
6. that prior to under floor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of
the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
7. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new
residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in
Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation of storm
water runoff,
that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be
required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
9. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of
the roof ridge and provide certification of that height;
10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other
licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details
such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no
licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide
the certification under penalty of perjury;
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and design review.
1327 Carlos Avenue effective October 2, 2003
page 2
11. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been
built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; and
12. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,
2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
L kW iiYta.vs�YVFtNPd6nY XmRp;pfIWWB[.➢®#➢PYiKI.ifMtfl[@!VJ ew !y ^}dgp5 -
Project Comments
Date: 8/4103
To: L°jCity Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
Fire Marshal
❑ Recycling Specialist
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling
with a detached garage at 1327 Carlos Ave., zoned R-1, APN:027-
191-050
Staff Review: 8/4/03
Reviewed by: V.�- Date: 6/04�03
V PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS 1i 7--
Project Namc:<W "
Project Address:_l?S 2 L'AdL14* tip.
The following requirements apply to the project
1 7i A property. boundary survey shall be preformed by a licensed land
surveyor. The survey shall show all property lines, property corners,
easements, topographical features and utilities. (Required prior to the
building permit issuance.) S 5gw-,4- S 14f.W
2 _�(The site and roof drain g-e s)iall be�on plans and should be made to
drain towards the Frontage Street. (Required prior to the building permit
issuance.)
3. The applicant shall submit project grading and drainage plans for
approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit.
4 The project site is in a flood zone, the project shall comply with the City's
flood zone requirements.
5 A sanitary sewer lateral 4M is required for the project in accordance with
the City's standards. (Required prior to the building permit issuance.)
6. The project plans shall show the required Bayfront Bike/Pedestrian trail
and necessary public access improvements as required by San Francisco
Bay Conservation and Development Commission.
7. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for the project. The sewer analysis
shall identify the project's impact to the City's sewer system and any
sewer pump stations and identify mitigation measures. - .
8 Submit traffic trip generation analysis for the project.
9. Submit a traffic impact study for the project. The traffic study should
identify the project generated impacts and recommend mitigation
measures to be adopted by the project to be approved by the City
Engineer.
10. The project shall file a parcel map with the Public Works Engineering
Division. The parcel map shall show all existing property lines, easements,
monuments, and new property and lot lines proposed by the map.
Page 1 of 3
LT:lprivate developmenAPLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
I
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
11. A latest preliminary title report of the subject parcel of land shall be
submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division with the parcel map
for reviews.
12, Map closure/lot closure calculations shall be submitted with the parcel
map.
13 The project shall submit a condominium map to the Engineering Divisions
in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
14 C The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public
improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary
appurtenant work.
15 The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage streetscape
improvements including sidewalk, curb, gutters, parking meters and poles,
trees, and streetlights in accordance with streetscape master plan.
16 By the preliminary review of plans, it appears that the project may cause
adverse impacts during construction to vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic
and public on street parking. The project shall identify these impacts and
provide mitigation measure acceptable to the City. .
17 The project shall submit hydrologic calculations from a registered civil
engineer for the proposed" creek enclosure. The hydraulic calculations
must show that the proposed creek enclosure doesn't cause any adverse
impact to both upstream and downstream properties. The hydrologic
calculations shall accompany a site map showing the area of the 100-year
flood and existing improvements with proposed improvements.
18 Any work within the drainage area, creek, or creek banks requires a State
Department of Fish and Game Permit and Army Corps of Engineers
Permits.
19 No construction debris shall be allowed into the creek.
20 _)C_ The project shall comply with the. City's NPDES permit requirement to
prevent storm water pollution.
21 The project does not show the dimensions of existing driveways, re-
submit plans with .driveway dimensions. Also clarify if the project is
proposing to widen the driveway. Any widening of the driveway is subject
to City Engineer's approval.
22 The plans do not indicate the slope of the driveway, re -submit plans
showing the.driveway profile with elevations
Page 2 of 3
Wprivate developmentTLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doe
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION
23— The back of the driveway/sidewalk approach shall be at least 12" above
the flow line of the frontage curb in the street to prevent overflow of storm
water from the street into private property.
24. For the takeout service, a garbage receptacle shall be placed in front. The
sidewalk fronting the store shall be kept clean 20' from each side of the
property.
25. For commercial projects a designated garbage bin space and cleaning area
shall be located inside the building. A drain connecting the garbage area to
the Sanitary Sewer System is required.
Page 3 of 3
U:\private developmenAPLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
Project Comments
Date: 8/4/03
To: ❑City Engineer
Chief Building Official
Fire Marshal
O Recycling Specialist
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling
with a detached garage at 1327 Carlos Ave., zoned R-1, APN:027-
191-050
Staff Review: 8/4/03
NaN��arC /L�oelr ec'�)p a4- Csft'V:.v S (ems
Rev' d by: Date:
Project Comments
Date: 8/4/03
To: ❑ City Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
13 Fire Marshal
E(Recycling Specialist
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling
With a detached garage at 1327 Carlos Ave., zoned R-1, APN:027-
191-050
Staff Review: 8/4/03
I
Applicant shall submit a Waste Reduction Plan and
----I Recycling Deposit for this and all covered projects and
sections of projects prior to any demolition, construction
or permitting.
Reviewe by: D-ate .
®Project Comments
Date: 8/4/03
To: ❑ City Engineer
❑ Chief Building Official
nr Fire Marshal
O Recycling Specialist
❑ City Arborist
❑ City Attorney
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Request for design review for a new two-story single family dwelling
with a detached garage at 1327 Carlos Ave., zoned R-1, APN:027-
191-050
Staff Review: 8/4/03
Reviewed by: Date: