Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - TSP - 2023.04.131 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Approved Minutes Regular Meeting of Thursday, April 13, 2023 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:04 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Israelit, Leigh, Martos, Ng, Rebelos MEMBERS ABSENT: 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) February 9, 2023 Special Meeting minutes Commissioner Leigh made a motion to accept the minutes as written. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Ng. The motion passed unanimously. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA Management Analyst Lilliana Cifuentes read the following emails received for public comment. The Journal article was the first that I have heard of this. I know I don’t go or follow the working of the cities plans on a regular basis, but you say that there was a “reach out” to city residents. I talked to my neighbors on Crescent and Barroilhet and not one knew of the project. Taking away lanes of traffic and putting in a bike lane seems to me at least to be money not well spent. I talked to my auto mechanic, and he was totally in the dark about this new bike lane. He says that there is no way that he can run his shop with the lane in place and the parking being removed. Just putting in my thoughts on this, maybe do a business-by-business survey to make sure that this is going to work for them and their customers. Donald Ackley __________________________________________________________________________________ 2 The owners and tenants have not had any Input or prior notification of the Bike lanes proposed. According to the business owners they have not been Notified in writing or in person. This change will affect all of the business in the district on California drive. The Burlingame city should have a Road and traffic study of this community to determine the effects of implementing this change of the city’s busy roadways. It really seems that the city needs to Listen to the community to better understand the needs of the businesses and the individuals who frequent this traffic zone. Sincerely Jay Beard __________________________________________________________________________________ Good evening, and I hope all the commissioners are well. I'd like to request that you add to a future agenda an item addressing traffic routing and enforcement plans in the instance of closures of El Camino Real, both emergency and planned. With the storms this year and planned construction, ECR has been partially or completely shut down several times. In these cases, traffic is disrupted, often creating unsafe conditions at ECR intersections or in the neighborhoods directly east and west of ECR. Our neighbors out for morning walks, kids crossing streets on the way to schools, anyone on a bike, and neighbors trying to pull out of their driveways are all subject to unpredictable and unsafe conditions on the streets. It would be ideal for the city to put into place traffic routing and enforcement plans that could be implemented as needed along ECR. Secondly, I suggest that the city publicly recognize the tremendous effort and bravery of the Burlingame School District crossing guards. They really do keep our kids safe. Thank you! Note: this is not a BPAC comment, but a personal comment Lesley Beatty 6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS a) Receive Presentation and Obtain Feedback for the Trousdale/Murchison/Davis Bicycle Facility Improvement Project Mr. Wong provided the following background on the project. He said the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) serves as the Congestion Management Agency and is responsible for the development and implementation of the TDA Article 3 Program in San Mateo County. Last year the City applied for the TDA Article 3 competitive grant program for the Murchison Drive, Trousdale Drive, and Davis Drive Bicycle Improvements Project. This project was identified from the established priority list included in the City’s 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP). The project scope consists of engineering design, including preparation of 3 plans and specifications, and the construction of bicycle facilities along Murchison Drive, Trousdale Drive, and Davis Drive. Mr. Wong pointed out the project aims to support Safe Routes to Schools, enhance connectivity, and improve safety and comfort for all riders. He explained the design concepts included in the BPMP will be further analyzed and vetted as part of the design process involving community outreach and feedback. He showed the preliminary project cost is estimated to be $1,025,000, and $400,000 in TDA Article 3 grant funds were awarded to the City. Mr. Wong indicated the design concept for Trousdale Drive in the BPMP includes a road diet with buffered bike lanes in both directions and parking will be maintained. This design concept will remove one travel lane from each direction and add a center turn lane. For Murchison Drive, he stated there will be separated bikeways in both directions with no trade-offs to parking or travel lanes. Mr. Wong said we are essentially mirroring what the city of Millbrae has on their side of Murchison. Mr. Wong shared there is no conceptual design for Davis Drive from the BPMP but pointed out its ranking within the document—all three streets have 7 or 6.5 points. He said the intention is to maintain all parking on Davis Drive. Mr. Wong stated they would be outreaching the community for input. He then went over the outreach process and pointed out the project is currently in the conceptual phase with the design team and getting ready for the first community outreach meeting. Chair Israelit opened the public comment period. Manito Velasco stated he supports this project, and the grant application was well-crafted. He said it would be nice to see a map that shows the limits of each project. He also pointed out that both Murchison and Trousdale were paved recently and said it’s unfortunate that the brand-new pavement and striping will have to be grinded out to install the bike lanes. Mr. Velasco said looking forward, when the streets are getting paved, to get a look ahead so that we can put back striping for free after the paving project. He said Davis Drive is a critical path to BIS and his hope there is for some speed reduction measures. Mr. Velasco also requested the City consider reducing the speed limit on Trousdale, especially in front of the hospital to 25 or 30 MPH. Management Analyst Lilliana Cifuentes read the following email received for public comment. Thank you for sharing the information that these bike projects will be moving forward. We support the conceptual designs proposed as they will calm traffic and provide safe access by bike to important destinations. We noticed that there was no mention of what will happen on Davis Drive. If Davis Drive is to be the designated bike boulevard for BIS, it must have some traffic calming applied to it to be safe. It's not a breeze to make it up Davis Drive on a bike under the best of circumstances, as it is reasonably steep. Add to it that BIS does not have lockers and the kids cart 4 around extremely heavy loads on their backs, they are likely to be going pretty slowly. With the existing pace and volume of traffic it does not seem possible that this would create a safe situation. We recommend you add the Davis Bike Boulevard into the BIS safety discussion, so that the bike routes can be considered alongside the proposed car routes for a more holistic discussion. Leslie Beatty Commissioner Leigh asked for clarification on the scope of the project in terms of the project limits. Mr. Wong said he believed Trousdale and Murchison are between California Drive and Quesada Way, and Davis Drive is between Quesada Way and Albemarle Way. However, he said he would confirm those details. Commissioner Leigh stated she was also hopeful speed reductions would be considered as part of this project. She said she was also in favor of mirroring the improvements in Millbrae on the city’s side of Murchison. Vice-Chair Rebelos inquired about the timing of the first community meeting. Mr. Wong stated they are looking to identify a date and that the goal is to have it soon—between now and summer. He echoed Commissioner Leigh’s request to have the bike lanes go through the intersection. Commissioner Ng asked about the status on SB37 to reduce speed limits. Mr. Wong said there is no update and stated they are trying to find out more details about it. Commissioner Martos asked about the preliminary plan for Davis Drive. Mr. Wong stated it is a Class IIIB – bike boulevard which consists of sharrows and traffic calming elements. Commissioner Martos stated he also liked the idea of mirroring the improvements in Millbrae on the city’s side of Murchison. Chair Israelit felt that it was too early in the design process to provide comments on the project and her fellow commissioners agreed. b) Receive Presentation and Obtain Feedback for the 2023 Annual Resurfacing Update Mr. Wong provided a presentation regarding the 2023 Annual Resurfacing Project. Mr. Wong stated that Burlingame utilizes an independent firm that reviews and determines the “pavement condition index” (PCI) score for all City streets. He shared that Burlingame’s street score averages 76, which is above average for San Mateo County cities. Mr. Wong explained that based on the PCI, available budget, coordination of other City projects, and other factors, staff identifies streets proposed for the annual resurfacing project and then presents the list to the City Council at the annual budget meeting. The 2023 Street Resurfacing Project scope consists of performing asphalt concrete “dig-out” repairs, surface milling, asphalt concrete overlay, traffic markings, traffic striping, concrete improvements, and other related work on the following streets: 1. Adeline Drive – El Camino Real to Cortez Avenue; 5 2. Bayshore Highway – Mitten Road to Mahler Road (digouts only); 3. Broadway – Vancouver Avenue to El Camino Real (digouts only); 4. Burlingame Avenue – Carolan Avenue to Dwight Road; 5. Donnelly Avenue – Primrose Road to Lorton Avenue (digouts only); 6. Gilbreth Road – Cowan Road to Mahler Road (digouts only); 7. Guittard Road – Rollins Road to end; and 8. North Carolan Avenue – Edwards Court to Rollins Road. Mr. Wong then addressed previous comments provided by the Community B/PAC. 1) Beach/Airport We spent the most time on this because there is a lot going on in this intersection. This place is a hotbed of bikes/peds, and work definitely needs to be done, including protecting the intersection for bikes getting over to the bay trail, and adding pedestrian crossings. We recommend Burlingame slow down on this one and remove it from this repaving cycle and add it to the next once it can be given the thought it deserves. City response: Airport Blvd. will be revisited with the 2024 Street Resurfacing Project 2) Adeline (2 blocks next to El Camino Real) Add a Hi-vis crosswalk on Adeline @El Camino Real (Caltrans). And add yellow crosswalks + advance stop lines on all 4 parts of the Adeline + Balboa intersection. Ultimately, the block of Adeline between ECR and Balboa should have a widened sidewalk since it is HEAVILY trafficked by families walking to Lincoln and people have to frequently walk in the street to pass each other. Could we widen the sidewalk mid-block and taper it at the ends? City response: Hi-vis crosswalks and advanced stop lines are added when within the project limits; this includes Adeline/Balboa. Requests outside of the project limits will be reviewed and addressed with separate projects. Concrete sidewalk repair is not part of the street resurfacing scope, and this request will be forwarded to the sidewalk program. 3) Burlingame Ave (3-4 blocks directly East of California Dr.) We'd like hi-vis, yellow crosswalks + advance stop lines at all of these intersections. We believe that these should be striped as school crossings because they abut a property on which the high school is located. City response: Staff recommends "white" high visibility crosswalks at these locations that are consistent with the Lyon Hoag pedestrian improvements. 4) Anita & Burlingame Ave. Please red stripe the curb in the middle (this used to be here but was removed, you can see what we mean here with the truck parked that reduces visibility). 6 City response: This issue was resolved by City Staff as part of a separate request. 5) Burlingame Ave and Bloomfield Road We’d like to extend curbs visually with paint since people blow through that intersection. City response: This request can be reviewed with the next phase of the Lyon Hoag traffic calming improvements. In closing, Mr. Wong went over next steps, which included that the project has been advertised for bids, with award of contract anticipated for the June 15, 2023 City Council meeting, and construction to begin summer of 2023. There were no public comments for this item. Commissioner Martos inquired how the projects were prioritized. Mr. Wong said there is not a straight algorithm they use, but they start with the budget, and balance many variables, such as how many streets they need to do, if they can get grant funding for larger arterial streets, the impact the improvement will have, etc. Vice-Chair Rebelos was wondering about the streets that are in light industrial areas, which are impacted by vehicle weight and asked if there were special criteria or a different funding source for those. Mr. Wong said he does not believe so but stated they have a different requirements compared to local residential streets. Commissioner Leigh inquired about school crossings at Adeline/Balboa, Adeline/Cortez, and Adeline/Bernal. She wanted to know if those intersections have four-way high visibility crosswalks with stop bars. Commissioner Leigh felt the school zones should be high priority. Mr. Wong confirmed they are all-way stops with high visibility crosswalks, but he would have to confirm the advanced stop bars. Commissioner Leigh asked about the intersection of Burlingame Avenue and Anita Road near BHS. Mr. Wong said it will be a high-visibility crosswalk with advanced stop bars. Commissioner Leigh inquired about the intersections at Donnelly/Primrose and Donnelly/Lorton. She requested a high- visibility crosswalk and advanced stop bars at Donnelly/Lorton and just a high-visibility crosswalk at Donnelly/Primrose. Mr. Wong clarified there was no crossing on Lorton, but they would take a look at the Primrose intersection. c) BIS School Safety Update Transportation Engineer Michael Tsai provided a presentation regarding the BIS school circulation plan. Mr. Tsai stated the project goals are to reduce congestion around the school and increase pedestrian safety to and from school. Chair Israelit shared that she is on the committee with Commissioner Ng, and they felt the safety situation around BIS was not acceptable and they have been working on ways to mitigate the conflicts they observed with pedestrians, cars, and bicycles 7 going to and from school. She said this is something they have been working on for almost three years. Chair Israelit stated the plan they are presenting tonight may not be perfect, but it has been given much thought, and many options have been considered and revised countless times. Mr. Tsai then went into the proposed circulation plan. (For ease of understanding, presentation visuals have been included below.) Mr. Tsai explained traffic originating from Quesada is in the green arrows and the blue arrows are cars originating from the neighborhood. Mr. Tsai stated the school drop-off exit is up Clarice to Sequoia or Marco Polo. He indicated the yellow arrows represent traffic only utilizing the satellite drop off location from Davis Drive. Mr. Tsai stated that in order to facilitate this kind of movement, a few things need to be done (displayed in white boxes in the image above). He said students can be dropped off in the loading zone on Quesada. SATELLITE DROPOFF BIS CAMPUS 8 Mr. Tsai then went into animated slides, which displayed existing pedestrian pathways and vehicle circulation, and pointed out the points of conflict. The following visual is the pedestrian pathway and vehicle circulation should the proposed plan be implemented. Mr. Tsai explained that the red arrows represent pedestrian movements, and all other arrows are vehicles with different points of origin. Mr. Tsai went over the supporting infrastructure needed to implement the above plan. He shared those changes include turn restriction signs and markings at the school exit driveway; crosswalk relocation at Quesada and Clarice; new crosswalk at satellite drop-off location at Marco Polo and Clarice; new additional pedestrian drop-off area, and no westbound vehicles on Clarice. Mr. Tsai stated that additional infrastructure considerations include a new multiway stop at Davis and Marco Polo; installation of red curb to enhance visibility at feasibly intersections; and installation of school warning assembly signage as appropriate. He said one thing that is not shown on this plan is a bike cage but said it will be implemented by the school, on school property. Chair Israelit helped identify the locations of the bike cages to be installed. Chair Israelit also briefly reiterated the circulation plan and the thinking behind it. 9 Commissioner Ng stated that there were so many different constraints they were working with, they exhausted many options, and they went through 7 or 8 iterations of the plan since he has been on the committee. He said he wanted to stress that this is a great first step. Commissioner Ng stated there are assurances that they will continue to monitor this and make adjustments as necessary. Chair Israelit opened the public comment period. Management Analyst Lilliana Cifuentes read the following email received for public comment. Thank you for your work towards making it safer for BIS students to get to and from school. We are extremely happy to see some movement on this very important area. With over 1,000 students on a campus located on streets that flat out can't handle that traffic, we support improvements that make it safe and convenient for kids to walk and bike as much as possible. We are supportive of your efforts to see if there is a suggested traffic flow of cars that can create a calmer and more manageable situation, including not allowing left turns on Clarice. We'd add the following suggestions: • please add the most popular pedestrian routes and the preferred bicycle routes to this map so it can be understood how these different modes will interact and identify any spots that need to be considered. • we do not support taking the crosswalk at Clarice/Quesada out. It is fine to add a second leg of the crosswalk, but it is unrealistic that kids will go out of their way to cross in a crosswalk. We should design for what we know the kids will do, because they are humans, and not what we'd like them to do. • Currently, the designated bike boulevard is Davis Drive, but in this design, it seems likely that Davis will have heavy car traffic and will be unsuitable for a bike boulevard. We'd like to suggest that only the lower blocks of Davis be designated as a bike boulevard (Albemarle to Marco Polo) and that bikes then be sent up Clarice to correspond with the traffic restrictions that are recommended in this plan. • Lastly, we'd like to suggest that the city reopen the topic of a second bike cage or moving the bike cage entirely to the southern end of BIS, which would allow the vast majority of kids biking to avoid the Quesada/Clarice mess. It was not possible two years ago because the school was starting construction of a new gym. That construction is wrapping up, and it would be worthwhile to explore again. Leslie Beatty The following public comment was received via email but was not read formally for the record. My name is Ingrid Gauthier and I am the BIS PTA president. BIS PTA community would love you be part of the conversation about the BIS safe route. We are here to support your committee in finding a safe and doable solution for this ongoing issue. 10 I would attend your TSPC meeting tonight however sadly we are hosting our pta meeting at the same time and we weren’t aware of this being on your agenda. Our next pta meeting in on Friday May 12 at noon, if you could we would LOVE for you to join us and share your updates and finds with our community. We so appreciate that there is a committee looking out for our children, and we really do want to find a way to help with a solution by working together. Thank you so much and I look forward to hearing from you, Ingrid Gauthier Commissioner Martos asked for the details for the drop off area on Marco Polo. Chair Israelit said there are two parking spaces in front of the “L” shaped building, but it is an informal drop off area. She said there are no homes or businesses in the first stretch where the drop off area is designated. Commissioner Martos asked how people will know it’s a designated drop off area. Mr. Tsai explained there are two unofficial drop off locations now that don’t have any signage. He said to facilitate the desired circulation plan, they would be able to do things like a white passenger loading zone with signage and time restrictions. Commissioner Martos said he wants to make sure it’s clear that is what those zones are there for. Commissioner Martos inquired if the circulation patterns will be enforced as he saw a lot of one-way arrows. Chair Israelit stated there will be signage, like Hoover, Roosevelt, and other surrounding schools. She said there will be parent education and a police presence to help with education and enforcement similar to what they did with Hoover School. Commissioner Martos said he thinks the circulation plan is great, and suggested as we educate the parents about the circulation that it continues as a regular reminder throughout the school year and not just once at the start of the school year. Commissioner Leigh clarified the one-way traffic is during school hours. She suggested making the crosswalk at the casual student drop off area a controlled intersection. Towards the school on Clarice, she said the corner of Clarice and Sequoia is another casual drop off location for students and parents who use Sequoia to get to Trousdale. Chair Israelit clarified they will not be able to do that any longer with the proposed circulation plan—the one way is eastbound during drop off. Commissioner Leigh suggested speed controls such as speed humps along Davis Drive, similar to what was done in the Lyon Hoag neighborhood. She also suggested instead of having the bike boulevard all the way up Davis Drive to Quesada, she suggested allowing bikes down Clarice and have Clarice be the bike boulevard the last two blocks as opposed to Davis. Commissioner Ng stated it was a great point and explained that was one iteration the committee considered. He explained the challenge is now you are flowing bicyclists into the egress of where they are directing cars to exit northbound on 11 either Sequoia or Marco Polo. Commissioner Ng also stated that speed humps on Davis are being considered. Commissioner Leigh indicated she liked the vehicle traffic circulation plan and felt it was a good improvement. She reiterated the desire for a controlled intersection near the satellite drop off location. Commissioner Leigh said she would like to see more pedestrian enhancements and suggested additional stop signs along the route. Mr. Tsai shared there is very little room for bicycles to operate, that is why the main goal was to alleviate the congestion issue first to see if the improvements would help create additional space for bicyclists and pedestrians. He also pointed out the Davis Drive bike project is running concurrently. Additionally, Mr. Tsai indicated there is a previous multi-way stop effort at Marco Polo and Davis that will pick up again. Vice-Chair Rebelos asked about any controls at the intersection as you exit right from the BIS driveway and make that left onto Clarice. Mr. Tsai stated it could be one motion and pointed out the crosswalk will be moved and out of the way of that turn movement. Vice-Chair Rebelos inquired if there was any consideration to closing the drop off loop and forcing students to be dropped off along Quesada as it would eliminate another conflict point. Chair Israelit stated that was a consideration, but they felt that would create more conflicts of students walking through the faculty parking lot. Mr. Tsai pointed out that there would be more conflicts with the school buses without the campus drop off loop. He did say they also considered moving the bus drop off, but the school did not support moving the bus drop off further because it hinges on faculty operation. Commisioner Leigh asked if there were other access routes to the school for bicyclists and pedestrians. Chair Israelit confirmed there is not. Chair Israelit closed by saying the motivation for this project is to increase bicycle and pedestrian safety—not once was it their priority to improve the convenience of vehicle traffic. Commissioner Ng stated he appreciated the collaborative effort that was made—it was top notch. Commissioner Leigh made a motion to support the project as presented. Vice-Chair Rebelos seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS a) Public Comment Related to Informational Items Management Analyst Lilliana Cifuentes read the following email received for public comment. Hello there again, 12 Acc to the Engr’s report, the $1.7M contract for the California Dr bikeway was already awarded by Council and about to start in May. The California Dr project did go twice in front of TSPC – once in June 2021 and again in August 2021. In both cases, I don’t remember any businesses commenting on the parking removal. It was never clear if they were notified about that specifically. In fact, at the August 2021 TSPC meeting, the Chair asked about outreach to the businesses, and the city consultant and the city staff said it was “too early” on in the process. But that outreach would happen if parking were to be removed. The Chair also at the time asked if a vote was necessary and was told - by staff - one wasn’t necessary yet. Earlier in tonight’s presentation, there was a slide showing the sausage-shaped slide of the public process. The 2nd TSPC box said, “Staff seeking TSPC support”. Does that mean a vote? That vote obviously didn’t happen on California Drive. If it did, then the Commissioners might have had a chance to ask and consider input from the businesses. So, my question: Is the intent for all future capital projects going in front of the Commission, including those discussed earlier today, that TSPC vote to support the project before it moves to Council? I think this is a good idea. I hope the Commissioners will consider making this procedural improvement and clarification. Thanks! Manito Velasco b) Community Group Updates No updates received. c) Engineering Division Reports Mr. Tsai provided the following update on various Public Works – Engineering projects. • Burlingame Station Pedestrian Improvements Project – Construction crews worked diligently around inclement weather conditions and have completed all concrete sidewalk curb and gutter work. Final roadway resurfacing is scheduled for the week of April 17. • California Drive Bike Facilities (Broadway to Oak Grove) – Construction Contract awarded to Interstate Grading & Paving, Inc. for $1,686,692.50 which was in line with the engineering estimate. Pre-construction meeting was completed on March 29 and construction slated to start in May. • BIS School Safety Study – Staff and TSPC subcommittee presented new school circulation plan to BIS school staff. The proposed circulation plan is supported by improvements to school 13 grounds as well as to neighborhood roadways in the immediate vicinity. • Burlingame Pedestrian Safe Routes and Mobility Improvements – Grant funded Citywide pedestrian project enhancing roughly 30 locations. Caltrans E76 was approved in April. Chair Israelit inquired if there was any update on the Broadway and California Drive intersection. Mr. Tsai said it is in the works and it will be brought back to TSPC at an upcoming meeting. She also asked about the traffic signal project at Oak Grove and Carolan. Mr. Tsai said it is currently in 95% design. Commissioner Martos asked about the Lyon Hoag traffic calming survey. Mr. Tsai said the consultant will be collecting volume data soon and explained that they were considering reaching out to some of the people from the first survey to see if their experience has changed over time or just sending out an entirely new survey. Commissioner Martos said he was under the impression a new survey would be available. Mr. Tsai responded that was the original plan and it still may happen. Commissioner Martos thought it was important to get more feedback through an additional survey. Commissioner Leigh asked if the Commission would receive a list of what the Burlingame Pedestrian Safe Routes and Mobility Improvements would be. She also asked about the improvements proposed on Burlingame Avenue to enhance the crossings. Mr. Wong said the Burlingame Avenue improvements are part of that project and offered to meet the Commissioners out in the field to go over any specific concerns. d) Police Department Reports Sergeant Roberts provided the collision report for both February and March as the March TSPC meeting was cancelled. He shared there were 19 collisions over the reporting period of February 2023. He stated there were 12 vehicle/vehicle collisions, 5 vehicle/parked vehicle collisions, 1 collision with a fixed object, and 1 vehicle/bicycle collision. Sergeant Roberts said there were no DUI collisions in February and shared the primary collision factors included unsafe turning movements or stop sign/right-of-way violations. For the month of March, Sergeant Roberts reported 32 collisions, which is fairly higher than the previous month. He shared that of the 32 collisions, 22 were vehicle/vehicle collisions, 3 vehicle/parked vehicle collisions, 6 collisions with a fixed object, and 1 vehicle/pedestrian collision. He shared there was 1 DUI collision. Sergeant Roberts indicated the primary collision factors included unsafe turning movements, speed, unsafe starting or backing, and several right- of-way violations. 14 e) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications No Chair or Commissioner communications. 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS a) Public Comment Related to Committee Reports No public comments received. b) Burlingame Avenue Pedestrian Safety Improvements (Leigh & Ng) Commissioners Leigh and Ng both stated they would like to take Mr. Wong up on his offer to walk Burlingame Avenue with them. c) BIS School Safety Study (Israelit & Ng) Commissioner Ng asked if the committee needs to be maintained for monitoring purposes. Chair Israelit said the committee should remain in place through implementation and they can revisit his question at that time. d) US 101 Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity (Leigh & Rebelos) Vice-Chair Rebelos said they’ve had two meetings and they intend to report back to the Commission with a final report in June. 9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS • Oak Grove Signal Project Update • Additional BIS Details • Broadway/California Update • Grant projects moving forward • Improvements on Davis Drive (not necessarily next month) 10. ADJOURNMENT 9:32 p.m.