HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - PC - 2025.01.27Planning Commission
City of Burlingame
Meeting Agenda
BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Council Chambers/Online7:00 PMMonday, January 27, 2025
To Attend the Meeting in Person:
Location: Council Chambers, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California 94010
To Attend the Meeting via Zoom:
Consistent with Government Code Section 54953, this Planning Commission Meeting will be held in person
and virtually via Zoom.
Please use the following link to attend the hearing virtually using Zoom:
Go to www.zoom.us/join
Meeting ID: 835 2750 5047
Passcode: 461850
To access the meeting by phone:
Dial 1-669-444-9171
Meeting ID: 835 2750 5047
Passcode: 461850
Please note that the public may not make public comments via Zoom during Planning Commission
meetings. The public may either attend the meeting in person to comment or send an email to
publiccomment@burlingame.org (see below).
To Provide Public Comment in Person:
Members of the public wishing to speak will be asked to fill out a "Request to Speak" card located on the
table by the door and then hand it to staff. The provision of a name, address, or other identifying
information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each, however, the Chair may adjust the
time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers.
To Provide Public Comment via Email:
Members of the public may provide written comments by email to publiccomment@burlingame .org for an
agenda item. Emailed comments should include the specific agenda item on which you are commenting,
or note that your comment concerns an item that is not on the agenda or is on the Consent Calendar.
To ensure the Planning Commission receives your comment, please submit your email no later than 4:00
p.m. on the day of the meeting. Any emails received after 4:00 p.m. will not be sent to the Planning
Commission prior to the meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
Page 1 City of Burlingame Printed on 1/27/2025
January 27, 2025Planning Commission Meeting Agenda
3. REQUEST FOR AB 2449 REMOTE PARTICIPATION
Announcements/consideration and approval of requests by Planning Commissioners to participate remotely
pursuant to AB 2449 (Government Code Section 54943(f)).
4. REVIEW OF AGENDA
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON-AGENDA
The public is permitted to speak on items that are listed under the Consent Calendar, Commissioner ’s
Reports, Director Reports, Requests for Future Agenda Items, new items, or items not on the agenda .
Public comments for scheduled agenda items should wait until that item is heard by the Planning
Commission.
Persons are required to limit their remarks to three (3) minutes unless an extension of time is granted by
the Chair. Speakers desiring answers to questions should direct them to the Planning Commission and, if
relevant, the Commission may direct them to the appropriate staff member. The Ralph M. Brown Act (the
State local agency open meeting law) prohibits the Planning Commission from acting on any matter that is
not on the agenda.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and /or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a
commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt.
Approval of January 13, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting Minutesa.
Draft January 13, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting MinutesAttachments:
Major Design Review and Special Permit at 723 Acacia Drive (Project No. DSR23-0028)
Application for Major Design Review and Special Permit for height for a second story
addition to an existing single -unit dwelling in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zoning
district.
Recommendation: That the Planning Commission, by resolution, approve the Major
Design Review and Special Permit as conditioned.
CEQA Determination: This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA
Guidelines.
Staff: Catherine Keylon, Senior Planner
Applicants and Property Owners: Alex and Andrea Zider
Architect: Nyhus Design Group, Eric Nyhus
b.
Page 2 City of Burlingame Printed on 1/27/2025
January 27, 2025Planning Commission Meeting Agenda
723 Acacia Dr - Staff Report
723 Acacia Dr - Area Map
723 Acacia Dr - Arborist Report
723 Acacia Dr - Resolution
723 Acacia Dr - Proposed Plans
Attachments:
7. ACTION ITEMS
Conditional Use Permit at 1210 Donnelly Avenue (Project No. CUP24-0003)
Application for Conditional Use Permit for a commercial recreation (small scale) use in an
existing commercial building in the DAC (Donnelly Avenue Commercial) zoning district.
Recommendation: That the Planning Commission, by resolution, approve the Conditional
Use Permit as conditioned.
CEQA Determination: This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301(a) of the CEQA
Guidelines.
Staff: Brittany Xiao, Assistant Planner
Applicant: Lorene Pescareta
Property Owner: Brett Barron (Authorized Agent)
a.
1210 Donnelly Ave - Staff Report
1210 Donnelly Ave - Area Map
1210 Donnelly Ave - Resolution
1210 Donnelly Ave - Proposed Plans
Attachments:
8. STUDY SESSION
Major Design Review, Variances, and Special Permits at 628 Vernon Way (Project No.
DSR24-0016)
Application for Major Design Review, Variances for front and side setbacks, and Special
Permits for plate height for a first and second story addition to an existing single -unit
dwelling in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zoning district.
Staff: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi, Associate Planner
Applicant and Architect: Mike Ma, MArch Design
Property Owner: Jason Ni
a.
Page 3 City of Burlingame Printed on 1/27/2025
January 27, 2025Planning Commission Meeting Agenda
628 Vernon Way - Staff Report
628 Vernon Way - Area Map
628 Vernon Way - Proposed Plans
628 Vernon Way - Renderings
628 Vernon Way - Public Comments
Attachments:
9. STAFF/COMMISSION REPORTS
- Staff/Commission Communications
10. ADJOURNMENT
Notice: Any individuals who require special assistance or a disability -related modification or
accommodation to participate in this meeting, or who have a disability and wish to request an alternative
format for the agenda, meeting notice, agenda packet or other writings that may be distributed at the
meeting, should contact Ruben Hurin, Planning Manager, by 10:00 a.m. on Monday, January 27, 2025 at
rhurin@burlingame.org or 650-558-7256. Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting, the materials related to it, and your ability
to comment.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this
agenda will be made available for inspection via www .burlingame.org/planningcommission/agenda or by
emailing the Planning Manager at rhurin@burlingame .org. If you are unable to obtain information via the
City's website or through email, contact the Planning Manager at 650-558-7256.
An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council within 10 days of the Planning
Commission's action on January 27, 2025. If the Planning Commission's action has not been appealed or
called up for review by the Council by 5:00 p.m. on February 6, 2025, the action becomes final. In order to
be effective, appeals must be in writing to the City Clerk and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of
$900.00, which includes noticing costs.
Page 4 City of Burlingame Printed on 1/27/2025
BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
City of Burlingame
Meeting Minutes
Planning Commission
7:00 PM Council Chambers/OnlineMonday, January 13, 2025
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Staff in attendance: Planning Manager Ruben Hurin,
Assistant Planner Fazia Ali, and Acting Assistant City Attorney Christie Crowl.
2. ROLL CALL
Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and TsePresent7 -
3. REQUEST FOR AB 2449 REMOTE PARTICIPATION
There were no requests.
4. REVIEW OF AGENDA
There were no changes to the agenda.
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS, NON-AGENDA
There were no public comments on non-agenda items.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
a.Approval of October 15, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Draft October 15, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting MinutesAttachments:
Commissioner Pfaff made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Schmid, to approve the
October 15, 2024 meeting minutes. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse7 -
b.Approval of December 9, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Draft December 9, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting MinutesAttachments:
Commissioner Pfaff made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Schmid, to approve the
December 9, 2024 meeting minutes. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse7 -
7. ACTION ITEMS
a.Design Review, Variance, and Special Permits at 2319 Easton Drive (Project No.
Page 1City of Burlingame
January 13, 2025Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
DSR24-0019)
Application for Design Review, Variances for front setback, and Special Permits for
building height and declining height envelope for second and third story additions to an
existing single-unit dwelling in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zoning district.
Recommendation: Approve with conditions.
CEQA Determination: This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA
Guidelines.
Staff: Erika Lewit, Senior Planner
Applicant and Designer: Alex Voldarsky
Property Owner: Jacob Chudnovsky
2319 Easton Dr - Staff Report
2319 Easton Dr - Attachments
2319 Easton Dr - Proposed Plans
2319 Easton Dr - Previous Plans
Attachments:
SPEAKERS:
Staff: Fazia Ali, Assistant Planner
Applicant: Alex Voldarsky
Members of Public: None
Emails: None
Documents: PowerPoint by Staff
Ex-Parte Communication: None
Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to approve Planning
Commission Resolution 2025-01.13-7A, as presented and subject to the conditions. The motion
carried by the following vote:
Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse7 -
b.Hillside Area Construction Permit at 1551 Los Montes Drive (Project No. HACP24-0007)
Application for Hillside Area Construction Permit for a new detached pergola at the rear
of an existing single-unit dwelling in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zoning district.
Recommendation: Deny
CEQA Determination: This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA
Guidelines.
Staff: 'Amelia Kolokihakaufisi, Associate Planner
Page 2City of Burlingame
January 13, 2025Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Applicant and Designer: Yaniv Shmelzer, Vision to Completion
Property Owners: Shan and Craig Hou
1551 Los Montes Dr - Staff Report
1551 Los Montes Dr - Attachments
1551 Los Montes Dr - Proposed Plans
Attachments:
SPEAKERS:
Staff: Ruben Hurin, Planning Manager
Applicant: Kris Salguero
Members of Public: Yi Zhou
Emails: None
Documents: PowerPoint by Staff
Ex-Parte Communication: Commissioner Tse noted that she met with the homeowner and got a tour of the
backyard. She also noted that she was able to meet the homeowner at 1542 Los Altos Drive and got to
see the impact on their view. Commissioner Pfaff noted that she was not able to visit the project site and
only reviewed the pictures in the staff report.
Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to continue Project No.
HACP24-0007 with the requirement that the applicant come back in two months after (1) working
with the neighbor to move over or lower the pergola to not impact the view; (2) erecting story
poles; (3) developing a solution with the neighbor; (4) removing the horizontal frames. The
motion carried by the following vote:
Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse7 -
c.Conditional Use Permit at 1241-1251 Whitehorn Way (Project No. CUP24-0004)
Application for a Conditional Use Permit for wholesale auto sales in an existing
warehouse building in the I-I (Innovation Industrial) zoning district.
Recommendation: Approve with conditions.
CEQA Determination: This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15301 of the CEQA
Guidelines.
Staff: Catherine Keylon, Senior Planner
Applicant: Sailesh Mehra c/o Larry Solomon
Architect: Michael Nilmeyer, Nilmeyer/Nilmeyer
Property Owner: Paul Dumesnil
1241-1251 Whitehorn Way - Staff Report
1241-1251 Whitehorn Way - Attachments
1241-1251 Whitehorn Way - Proposed Plans
Attachments:
SPEAKERS:
Staff: Fazia Ali, Assistant Planner
Applicant: Sailesh Mehrah
Members of Public: None
Page 3City of Burlingame
January 13, 2025Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Emails: None
Documents: PowerPoint by Staff
Ex-Parte Communication: None
Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Comaroto, to approve
Planning Commission Resolution 2025-01.13-7C with the following added condition:
6. that the Conditional Use Permit shall apply only to wholesale auto sales with a maximum of
twelve (12) vehicles per year.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse7 -
d.Master Sign Program at 1855-1881 Rollins Road (Project No. MSP24-0002)
Application for Master Sign Program for a new projecting sign above the first story on a
mixed-use residential building in the RRMU (North Rollins Road Mixed -Use) zoning
district.
Recommendation: Approve with conditions.
CEQA Determination: This project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15311(a) of the CEQA
Guidelines.
Staff: Erika Lewit, Senior Planner
Applicant, Designer and Property Owner: Robert Eaves, The Hanover Company
1855-1881 Rollins Rd - Staff Report
1855-1881 Rollins Rd - Attachments
1855-1881 Rollins Rd - Proposed Plans
Attachments:
SPEAKERS:
Staff: Fazia Ali, Assistant Planner
Applicant: Kyle Staley
Members of Public: None
Emails: None
Documents: PowerPoint by Staff
Ex-Parte Communication: None
Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to approve Planning
Commission Resolution 2025-01.13-7D as presented and subject to the conditions. The motion
carried by the following vote:
Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse7 -
8. STUDY SESSION
a.Design Review, Variance, and Special Permit at 1661 Westmoor Road (Project No.
DSR24-0017)
Page 4City of Burlingame
January 13, 2025Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Application for Design Review, Variance for front setback, and Special Permit for plate
height for a new, single -unit dwelling and attached garage in the R -1 (Low Density
Residential) zoning district.
Staff: Fazia Ali, Assistant Planner
Applicant and Architect: Wing Lee
Property Owner: Jeff Lue
1661 Westmoor Rd - Staff Report
1661 Westmoor Rd - Attachments
1661 Westmoor Rd - Proposed Plans
Attachments:
SPEAKERS:
Staff: Fazia Ali, Assistant Planner
Applicant: Wing Lee
Members of Public: Jeff Lue and Sydney Lue
Emails: None
Documents: PowerPoint by Staff
Ex-Parte Communication: None
Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Vice Chair Horan, to place the item on the
Action Calendar when plans have been revised as follows:
1. window at the front bedroom in regard to shape and size
2. house lacks detail and charm
3. concerned about siding design and material
4. concerned with lack of roof eaves
5. needs more detail to be consistent with neighborhood
6. concerned with verticality
7. concerned with tall forehead above garage door and front bedroom
8. add design aesthetic to improve curb appeal
9. garage is low and entry door is high, so take a look at that
10. concerned with massing at the front of the house
11. take a look at the roof above the front door
12. front door does not work with the style of house
13. add window openings
14. reduce plate height at the front of the house to 9 feet to comply
15. bring roof above the front bedroom down to align with the roof above front entry
16. add articulation above the garage door
17. consider larger fascia boards
18. look at landscaping at the front of house to reduce verticality
19. include skylights on building elevations
20. include details for windows and window trim
21. add exterior lighting and gutters and exterior details
22. consider a modern stucco finish
23. concerned about bringing siding down to the ground level
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse7 -
Page 5City of Burlingame
January 13, 2025Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
b.Design Review and Special Permit at 723 Acacia Drive (Project No. DSR23-0028)
Application for Design Review and Special Permit for height for a second story addition
to an existing single-unit dwelling in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zoning district.
Staff: Catherine Keylon, Senior Planner
Applicants and Property Owners: Alex and Andrea Zider
Architect: Nyhus Design Group, Eric Nyhus
723 Acacia Dr - Staff Report
723 Acacia Dr - Attachments
723 Acacia Dr - Proposed Plans
Attachments:
SPEAKERS:
Staff: Fazia Ali, Assistant Planner
Architect: Eric Nyhus
Members of Public: None
Emails: None
Documents: PowerPoint by Staff
Ex-Parte Communication: None
Commissioner Schmid made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tse, to place the item on the
Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye:Comaroto, Horan, Lowenthal, Pfaff, Schmid, Shores, and Tse7 -
9. STAFF/COMMISSION REPORTS
Planning Manager Hurin noted that at their meeting on December 16, 2024, the City Council adopted the
ADU Ordinance Update and Tree Ordinance Update.
10. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:11 p.m.
Page 6City of Burlingame
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item: 6b Hearing Date: January 27, 2025
Project No. DSR23-0028
Applicants and Property Owners Alex and Andrea Zider
Architect Nyhus Design Group, Eric Nyhus
Staff Catherine Keylon, Senior Planner
Location 723 Acacia Drive
APN: 029-043-150
General Plan Designation Low Density Residential
Zoning R-1 (Low Density Residential)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Review of an application for Major Design Review and Special Permit for height for a second story
addition to an existing single-unit dwelling in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zoning district. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission, by resolution, approve Major Design Review and
Special Permit as conditioned.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is an interior, upsloping lot with an existing single-unit dwelling and a detached
garage. The applicant is proposing to expand the existing second floor and remove a storage room
at the rear of the detached garage. The proposed floor area is 3,475 SF (0.52 FAR) where 3,611 SF
(0.54 FAR) is the maximum allowed (includes covered porch and basement exemptions).
There are a total of four bedrooms in the existing house. With this application, the number of
bedrooms would increase from four to six; the study room on the ground floor meets the code
definition of a bedroom. Three parking spaces, two of which must be covered, are required for a six-
bedroom house. The existing detached garage measures 17’-8” wide x 22’-8” deep (clear interior
dimensions) and falls short of the required 18’-0” width that is allowed for a two-car garage. Since
the existing garage only has an interior width of 17’-8”, it only counts as one covered parking space.
Staff would note that the driveway is approximately 90 feet in length and can provide uncovered
parking for up to five vehicles.
The applicant is applying AB 2097, which prevents jurisdictions from enforcing a minimum parking
requirement for development on any property that is within one -half mile of a major public transit
stop, including bus stops along the El Camino Real Corridor. Since the project site is located within
one -half mile of a bus stop along El Camino Real, a Parking Variance for a second covered parking
space is not required under AB 2097.
A Special Permit is requested for the overall building height (Special Permit required for building
height between 30 and 36 feet). With the proposed second floor addition the proposed height
(measured from average top of curb elevation) would be 32’-1”, where the maximum height allowed
without a Special Permit is 30’-0”. Staff would note that the existing finished floor is located 7’-11”
above average top of curb.
PC/01/27 /2025
Project No. DSR23-00 28
723 Acacia Drive
Page 2
The project site contains two existing trees which will remain. Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc.
prepared an arborist report, dated September 24, 2024, for the project and is included as an
attachment for reference. Based on the proposed floor area, a minimum of three landscape trees
are required on-site. Two existing landscape trees on-site count towards this requirement. The third
required tree is unable to be planted due to the location of on-site underground utilities. The Parks
Department has approved payment of an in-lieu fee of $1,500 to meet th is requirement. There are
two Sycamore Maple street trees located in the front planter strip which will remain.
The applicant is requesting the following applications:
• Major Design Review for a second story addition to an existing single -unit dwelling (C.S.
25.68.020 (C)(1)(b)); and
• Special Permit for height (32’-1” proposed where 30’-0” is the maximum allowed) (C.S.
25.78.020 (A)(3)).
January 13, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting
At the Planning Commission study meeting on January 13, 2025, the proposed project was well
received by the Planning Commission and they voted to place this item on the Consent Calendar
with no changes recommended to the plans.
ANALYSIS
The project has been designed to accordance with the Residential Design Guidelines and R-1 zoning
district development standards, with the exception of the building height. The proposed second story
addition will be integrated into the design of the existing house with the use of quality materials and
architectural elements. The addition does not appear tacked onto the existing house, but matches
the mass and bulk of the existing structure and is also complimentary to the context of the other
homes on the block.
Given the existing raised finished floor (7’-11” above average top of curb), large crawlspace below,
and upsloping lot, the request for a Special Permit for height is warranted.
Table 1: Project Information
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ’D
Front Setbacks (1st flr):
(2nd flr):
25’-11”
42’-9”
no change
29’-2”
15'-0" or block
average
20’-0”
Side Setbacks (left):
(right):
6’-4”
12'-6"
5’-4”
12'-11"
4'-0"
4'-0"
Rear Setbacks (1st flr):
(2nd flr):
38’-11”
38’-11” no change 15’-0”
20’-0”
Lot Coverage: 2,195 SF
33.2%
2,118 SF ¹
32%
2,640 SF
40%
PC/01/27 /2025
Project No. DSR23-00 28
723 Acacia Drive
Page 3
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ’D
FAR:
2,929 SF
0.44 FAR
3,475 SF
0.52 FAR
3,611 SF ²
0.54 FAR
# of bedrooms: 4 6 ---
Off-Street Parking:
1 covered ³
(17’-8” x 22’-8”)
1 uncovered
(12’-11” x 18 ’-0”’)
no change 3
2 covered
(18’ x 18’)
1 uncovered
(9’ x 18’)
Building Height: 25’-10” 32’-1” 4 30’-0”
Plate Height (1st flr):
(2nd flr):
7’-10” – 9’-0”
6’-5” – 7’-10”
no change
8’-0”
9’-0”
8’-0”
Declining Height
Envelope: complies complies C.S. 25.10.055
¹ Lot coverage has been reduced with the proposed project because the existing garage is being
modified with removal of the rear storage area.
² (0.32 x 6,600 SF) + 1,100 SF + 398.52 SF = 3,611 SF (0.54 FAR)
³ Applying AB 2097; property is located within one-half mile of public transit and therefore not
required to comply with parking requirements.
4 Special Permit requested for height (32’-1” proposed where 30’-0” is the maximum allowed).
Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials:
• Windows: aluminum clad wood windows with simulated true divided lites
• Doors: wood doors
• Siding: wood shingles on first floor to remain; fiber cement shingles proposed on second floor
• Roof: asphalt shingles
Design Review Criteria
The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 2000 adopted by the City Council on
December 6, 2021 are outlined as follows:
1. Consistency with any applicable design guidelines;
2. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the
neighborhood;
3. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
4. Architectural style and consistency and mass and bulk of structures, including accessory
structures;
5. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties;
6. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components; and
7. In the case of an addition, compatibility with the architectural style and character of the
existing structure as remodeled.
PC/01/27 /2025
Project No. DSR23-00 28
723 Acacia Drive
Page 4
Environmental Review
The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing
structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an increase
of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition.
Attachments:
Area Map
Arborist Report
Resolution
Proposed Plans, dated December 5, 2024
723 Acacia Drive
300’ noticing
APN: 029-043-150
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 2 September 24, 2024
Tree Survey
Tree
#
Species
Common
(Scientific)
Diameter
(inches)
Protected
Y/N
Condition
(percent)
Height
(feet)
Spread
(feet)
Comments
1 London
Plane
(Plantanus
hispanica)
18.0
Y
55 35 27 70% of root-zone is covered by
asphalt street and concrete
sidewalk, multi-stem attachment at
7 feet high, anthracnose affected
leaves throughout the canopy, fair
form and vigor, utility lines going
through the canopy.
2 London
Plane
(Plantanus
Hispanica)
18.3
Y
55 35 30 80% of root-zone is covered by
asphalt street, concrete sidewalk
and pavers on neighboring
driveway, multi-stem attachment at
7 feet high, utility lines going
through the canopy, fair form and
vigor.
3 Saucer
magnolia
(Magnolia
soulangeana)
Est. 6.0
N
60 8 12 Root-crown covered, multi-stem at
the base, fair form and vigor, no
tag on the trunk.
4 Mayten Tree
Hedge
(Maytenus
boaria)
Est. 6.0-
7.0
N
55 15 8 Located on neighboring property
along the property line fence,
could not inspect the base due to
the 7-foot-tall fence, good vigor
and fair forms. (Four trees that
form informal privacy hedge)
5 Camphor
(Camphora
officinarum)
16.6
Y
60 20 18 Partially covered root-crown
measured below multi-stem
attachment at 4 feet high, good
vigor and fair form.
6 Deodara
Cedar
(Cedrus
Deodara)
Est. 13.0
N
55 45 24 Located on rear neighboring
property behind property line
fence. no tag, could not inspect
lower 6 feet due to the location,
codominant top at 30 feet high,
good vigor and poor form.
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 3 September 24, 2024
Tree
#
Species
Common
(Scientific)
Diameter
(inches)
Protected
Y/N
Condition
(percent)
Height
(feet)
Spread
(feet)
Comments
7 Pittosporum
eudenioides
Hedge
(Pittosproum
eugenioides)
Est. 5.0-
6.0
N
55 20 8 Located on the right neighboring
property along the property line
fence, no tag, could not inspect
the lower 6 feet due to their
location, good vigor and fair hedge
form. (about 14 trees that form
privacy hedge)
Observations
This is a well-maintained property with a two-story single-family home and detached
garage. The landscape received routine maintenance, and there are hedges along each
side of the property on the adjacent properties.
Trees #1 and #2 are Sycamore Maple trees located in the planter strip between the
sidewalk and the street. Both trees have large portions of their root zones covered by
the street, the sidewalk, and the neighboring driveway. Their leaves are affected by a
foliar fungus called anthracnose, causing browning and a disfigured appearance. They
have multi-stem attachments around 7 feet, and utility lines are going through both
canopies.
I recommend routine maintenance take place with permits to perform the work. This
work should include thinning the canopies, removing interior deadwood, and clearing the
utility lines. Spraying the canopies to control the anthracnose will improve their overall
appearance, but with the autumn season coming soon, waiting till spring would be wise
to save money.
Tree #3 is a Saucer Magnolia near the home's front left corner. Soil and other organic
material cover the root crown; it has a multi-stem attachment near its base. Overall, this
tree has good vigor and fair form.
I recommend routine tree maintenance, including exposing the root crown, continuing
with the shaping to maintain a smaller balanced form, and fertilizing the tree once a year
with a general all-purpose fertilizer.
Tree #4 is a hedge row of four Mayten trees located along the left property line on the
neighboring property. I placed no identification numbers on the trees, nor could I inspect
the lower 6 feet of their trunks due to their location. The canopies appear healthy and
vigorous, and I estimated the trunks to be 6 to 7 inches in diameter.
I recommend routine maintenance continue with side pruning of the canopies along the
property line to maintain hedge form, promote lateral growth, and reduce growth over the
property line and the client’s driveway.
Tree #5 is a Camphor tree located along the rear right corner of the property. Soil and
other organic material partially cover the root crown; I measured the trunk diameter
below the multi-stem attachment at 4 feet high. Overall, this tree has good vigor and fair
form.
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 5 September 24, 2024
Tree Locations
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 6 September 24, 2024
Tree #1
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 7 September 24, 2024
Tree #2
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 8 September 24, 2024
Tree #3
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 9 September 24, 2024
Tree #4
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 10 September 24, 2024
Tree #5
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 11 September 24, 2024
Tree #6
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 12 September 24, 2024
Tree #7
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 13 September 24, 2024
Tree #7a
Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. STATE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NO. 276793 CEIITIFJED ARBORISfS • PESI' CONTROL • ADVISORS AND OPERATORS
JEROMEY fNGALLS President Certified Arborist: WE7076A September 24 2024 (Updated November 26 2024)QAL 138432 • 535 BRAGATO ROAD. STE. A SAN CARLOS, CA 94070-6311 TELEPHONE: (650) 593-4400 EMAIL: info@maynetree.com
Roberto Martinez
Nyhus Design Group
1555 Bayshore Hwy, Suite 120
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear, Mr. Martinez,
RE: 723 ACACIA DR., BURLINGAME (PLAN REVIEW)
At your request, I reviewed all proposed construction plans, dated 07-02-2024 ,
designed for the above address_ The purpose of my review of the plans is to
determine what will be built on the property, how that construction will impact the trees
around the property, and how to mitigate that impact by implementing a Tree
Protection Plan to reduce the-effect on the tree's health and structural integrity_ I Limitations of this Letter
The following tree protection plan is based on my interpretation of the plans that were
provided to me. I accept no responsibility for any misinterpreted portions of the
construction project or if the provided plans were changed without my knowledge after
receiving a copy.
The following letter is not a contract to become the site arborist or for any future
inspections that might be needed. A separate contract would need to be established to
perform the role of site arborist for this project. I Plan Review
During my review of the Civil plans, pages 1 and 2, dated 7-2-2024, I determined most of
the proposed construction will be limited to the home's interior. The work planned for the
exterior of the home is along the front of the property and includes the replacement of
the sidewalk and the driveway apron.
Trees #1 and #2 will be partially impacted by the proposed construction. No other trees
should be impacted. Tree Protection Fencing should be placed at designated distances
around the trees on the property to protect the roots and eliminate the potential for
storage of construction materials within their protected root zones.
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 2 September 24, 2024 (Updated November 26, 2024
Trees #1 and #2 should have fencing along the planter strip, as shown on the site plans.
Typically, this fencing would be placed approximately 90 inches away from the trunk 360
degrees around the tree. Due to their location, this is impossible. Therefore, the best
location for this fencing is along the planter strip, as I have drawn on the provided site
plan.
The replacement of the sidewalk, curb, gutter, and driveway apron will expose portions
of the root zones of trees #1 and #2 that were previously covered by the hardscape in
these areas. When work is being completed within the protected root zone (10x DBH) of
any protected tree, it is important to minimize the disturbance to the tree's roots.
Therefore, any excavations within the protected root zone of any protected tree should
be accomplished by hand digging or using compressed air tools. Construction vehicles
should not be allowed within the protected root zones of these two trees unless the roots
are protected with a hardscape such as the street or other hardscape (Parking along the
street is acceptable). All roots less than 2 inches in diameter exposed during any
excavation should be cut cleanly with hand pruners or loppers back to the excavation
wall nearest to the tree.
Any roots found that are larger than 2 inches in diameter should be left uncut and intact;
the site arborist shall be contacted immediately. The roots in this area should be left
untouched until the site arborist can identify, inspect, document, and decide on the root’s
fate.
Trenches and newly exposed portions of the root-zones should be backfilled as soon as
possible to minimize the drying out of any exposed roots of the protected trees. If any
trenches are left open for longer than 24 hours, the excavation wall closest to the
protected trees shall be lined with 3 to 4 layers of burlap. These burlap layers shall be
kept moist throughout the trench being open.
Tree #3 should be protected with tree protection fencing placed to the tree's dripline
roughly 48 inches from the trunk. I have drawn the approximate location for this fencing
on the provided site map.
Tree #4 should not need fencing as they are behind the property line fence, and the
paver driveway protects the roots.
Tree #5 will require fencing to be placed roughly 85 inches away from the trunk of this
tree. I have drawn the approximate location for this fencing on the provided site map.
Tree #6 will require no fencing as it is located along the rear of the property behind the
property line fence.
Tree #7 will require no fencing as it is located along the rear of the property behind the
property line fence.
A small diameter Lemon tree along the right side of the garage should have fencing
placed around its root zone to protect it during construction.
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 3 September 24, 2024 (Updated November 26, 2024
TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS
1. Establish a perimeter around the protected trees that follow the trees’ driplines as
closely as possible. This perimeter should have 6-foot-tall chain link fencing
supported by 1½- to 2-inch diameter metal pipes. These support pipes shall be
no more than 10 feet apart. This enclosed area is the Tree Protection Zone
(TPZ) and should be off -limits to workers, construction debris, and construction
activities.
2. Temporary movable barriers, such as chain link fencing panels supported by
cement blocks, can be used in place of fixed fencing in certain situations.
Permission to use such panels will need to be discussed with the project arborist
prior to installation. Once these panels are located, they should not be moved
closer to the tree without the consent of the Project Arborist or City Arborist.
3. To protect the health, structural integrity, and vigor of the protected trees and
their roots,
DO NOT:
a. Allow runoff or spillage of damaging materials into the area below any
tree canopy.
b. Store materials, stockpile soil, or park or drive vehicles within the TPZ.
c. Cut, break, skin, or bruise roots, branches, or trunks without first obtaining
authorization from the City Arborist.
d. Allow fires under and adjacent to trees.
e. Discharge exhaust into foliage.
f. Secure cable, chain, or rope to trees or shrubs.
g. Trench, dig, or otherwise excavate within the dripline or TPZ of the trees
without first obtaining authorization from the City Arborist.
h. Apply soil sterilant under pavement near existing trees.
4. When work is being completed within the dripline of any protected tree, it is
essential to minimize the disturbance to the tree's roots. Therefore, any
excavations within the dripline of any protected tree should be accomplished by
hand digging or using compressed air tools. All roots less than 2 inches in
diameter exposed during any excavation should be cut cleanly with hand pruners
or loppers back to the excavation wall nearest to the tree. Any roots found that
are larger than 2 inches in diameter should be left uncut and intact; the site
arborist shall be contacted immediately. The roots in this area should be left
untouched until the site arborist can identify, inspect, document, and decide on
the root’s fate.
5. Trenches should be filled as soon as possible to minimize the drying out of any
exposed roots of the protected trees. If any trenches are left open for longer than
24 hours, the excavation wall closest to the protected trees shall be lined with 3
to 4 layers of burlap. These burlap layers shall be kept moist throughout the
trench being open.
723 Acacia Dr., Burlingame 5 September 24, 2024 (Updated November 26, 2024
Tree Protection/Fencing
DSR23-0028
PC/01/27/2025
Page 1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-
APPROVING MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 723 ACACIA DRIVE
PROJECT NO. DSR23-0028
WHEREAS, an application has been made by Alex and Andrea Zider, Property Owners, for
Major Design Review and Special Permit for height for a second story addition to an existing single-
unit dwelling in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zoning district, APN: 029-043-150; and
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame held a
duly noticed public hearing at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other
written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; and
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame reviewed
and considered a Categorical Exemption under Section 15301 (e)(1) for the Project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame does here by resolve, find,
determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1: The project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to
existing structures are exempt from environmental review, provided the addition will not result in an
increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition.
SECTION 2: City of Burlingame Municipal Code (BMC) authorizes the Planning Commission
to grant approval of a Major Design Review and Special Permit application upon making certain
findings. The Planning Commission finds the following:
MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS (BMC SECTION 25.68.060(H))
1. The project is consistent with the General Plan and is in compliance with all applicable
provisions of Title 25, all applicable design guidelines, all other City ordinances and regulations,
and the standards established in BMC Section 25.68.060 (C).
The proposed second story addition to the existing single-unit dwelling is consistent with the
General Plan designation of Low Density Residential and is in compliance with all applicable
provisions of Title 25; the proposed addition complies with the Residential Design Guidelines
in that the mass and bulk of the added square footage on the second floor is in scale with the
existing structure and in relation to neighboring properties, and that the architectural details
follow a traditional design and are cohesive with the details of the existing building with wood
doors, fiber cement shingles, decorative wood corbels, aluminum clad wood windows and
wood posts, making the project compatible with the character of the neighborhood.
2. The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topography, and
other circumstances to accommodate the proposed development.
The project will be constructed on a parcel that is adequate in shape, size, topography, and
other circumstances to accommodate the proposed development as shown on the proposed
plans.
3. The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consideration to ensure the public
health, safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring property.
DSR23-0028
PC/01/27/2025
Page 2
The project is designed and arranged to provide adequate consideration to ensure the public
health, safety, and general welfare, and to prevent adverse effects on neighboring property
because the project complies with setback, lot coverage, floor area ratio, declining height
envelope, and parking requirements.
SPECIAL PERMIT FINDINGS FOR THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT (BMC SECTION 25.78.020(A)(3))
1. The blend of mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the new construction or
addition are consistent with the existing structure’s design and with the well-defined character
of the street and neighborhood.
The blend of mass, scale, and dominant structural characteristics of the proposed second story
addition is consistent with the character of the existing house and the street. The proposed
new and existing second floor roof slope of 5:12 are keeping the existing second floor plate
height to maintain the characteristics of the existing house. The mass and bulk are
complimentary to the neighborhood.
2. The variety of roof line, façade, exterior finish materials, and elevations of the proposed new
structure or addition are consistent with the existing structure, street, and neighborhood.
The variety of roof line, façade, exterior finish materials, and elevations of the proposed
addition are consistent with the existing street and neighborhood in that the added height
results from the topography of the lot and if the lot did not slope upward with the existing
finished floor 7’-11” above the average top of curb elevation, then the proposed building height
would be under the maximum allowed building height.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the residential design guidelines adopted by the City.
The project is designed to be integrated into the design of the existing house with the use of
quality materials and architectural elements. The addition does not appear tacked onto the
existing house, but matches the mass and bulk of the existing structure and is also
complimentary to the context of the other homes on the block, consistent with the residential
design guidelines.
4. Removal of any trees located within the footprint of any new structure or addition is necessary
and is consistent with the City’s reforestation requirements, and that the mitigation for the
removal that is proposed is consistent with established City policies and practices.
There are no trees that are proposed for removal associated with this project.
SECTION 3: The Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame after conducting the public
hearing HEREBY APPROVES DSR23-0028 subject to the following conditions:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division and
date stamped December 5, 2024, sheets A001 through A302 and C-0 through C-3.1;
2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof
height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division
or Planning Commission review.
DSR23-0028
PC/01/27/2025
Page 3
3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage,
which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this
permit;
4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be
placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development
Director;
5. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the
site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required
to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction
plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by
the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of
approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of
approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the
approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal;
7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building
permit is issued;
8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance
which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, in effect at time of building permit submittal, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION
PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION:
10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the
project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional,
that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for
the property;
11. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification
that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing,
such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural
certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the
Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; and
12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
SECTION 4: The Major Design Review and Special Permit approval shall be subject to
revocation if the applicant fails to comply with the conditions listed herein at any time. If, at any time,
DSR23-0028
PC/01/27/2025
Page 4
the Community Development Director or Planning Commission determine that there has been or may
be a violation of the findings or conditions of this approval, or of the Zoning Regulations, a public
hearing may be held before the Planning Commission to review this approval pursuant to Zoning
Regulation Section 25.88.050. At said hearing, the Planning Commission may add conditions, or
recommend enforcement actions, or revoke the approval entirely, as necessary to ensure compliance
with the Zoning Regulations, and to provide for the health, safety, and general welfare of the
community.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January 2025.
Chairperson
I, _____________ , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 27th day of January 2025 by the following vote:
Secretary
Exhibits:
Exhibit A - Project Plans dated December 5, 2024
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item: 7a Hearing Date: January 27, 2025
Project No. CUP24-0003
Applicant Lorene Pesacreta
Property Owner Brett Barron (Authorized Agent)
Staff Brittany Xiao, Assistant Planner
Location 1210 Donnelly Avenue
APN: 029-151-140
General Plan Designation Downtown Specific Plan
Zoning DAC (Donnelly Avenue Commercial)
Zoning Overlay Downtown Parking Sector Overlay
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Review of an application for Conditional Use Permit for a commercial recreation – small scale use
(pilates studio) in an existing commercial building. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission, by resolution, approve the Conditional Use Permit as
conditioned .
BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate a pilates studio in an existing
commercial building located at 1210 Donnelly Avenue, zoned DAC. A pilates studio falls under the
Zoning Code definition as a commercial recreation – small scale use which requires a Conditional
Use Permit in the DAC Zoning District.
The existing single-story building contains two tenant spaces. The pilates studio would be located in
the tenant space on the right side of the building, which measures approximately 1,595 SF in area.
There is a mix of retail and food establishment uses on the same street as the subject property.
Previously, 1210 Donnelly Avenue was occupied by a physical therapy office.
The proposed pilates studio would offer small group sessions with one instructor and up to five
customers at a time. As shown on the proposed plans, the pilates studio would contain six reformer
machines. Hours of operation would be 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday, 6:00 a.m.
to 1:00 p.m. Friday, and 7:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on weekends. No construction or major modifications
to the building are required or proposed by the applicant.
The applicant is requesting the following application:
Conditional Use Permit for a commercial recreation use (small scale) in an existing
commercial building (Code Section 25.16.020).
ANALYSIS
The proposed commercial recreation use is allowed within the DAC Zoning District with a Conditional
Use Permit. The proposed use complies with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning Code. The
Downtown Specific Plan encourages mixed uses in order to promote a pedestrian-oriented district.
PC/01/27 /2025
Project No. CUP24-00 03
1210 Donnelly Avenue
Page 2
Staff finds that a pilates studio would meet the intent of this policy of the Specific Plan as it would
add to the current mix of uses in the downtown area.
This property is located on the ground floor within the Downtown Parking Sector Overlay. All uses
located on the ground floor within the parking sector are exempt from providing off-street parking.
Parking in the vicinity is available in Public Parking Lots A, A-3, C and D on Donnelly Avenue.
Table 1: Project Information
Previous Use Proposed Use Allowed/Req’d
Use: vacant
(previously a physical
therapy office)
1,595 SF
pilates studio
(commercial recreation
– small scale)
1,595 SF
commercial
recreation use
allowed with a
Conditional Use
Permit (Code Section
25.16.020)
Off-Street Parking: none none ground floor uses in
parking sector are
exempt from
providing off-street
parking
Staff notes that this application was brought directly to the Planning Commission as an Action item
due to the low impact nature of the business and the size of the tenant space. However, if the
Commission feels that there is a need for more discussion, then this item may be placed on a future
action calendar for a second review and/or public hearing with direction to the applicant.
Environmental Review
The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), per Section 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that
interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical
conveyances are exempt from environmental review.
Attachments:
Area Map
Resolution
Proposed Plans dated December 11, 2024
1210 Donnelly Avenue
300’ noticing
APN: 029-151-140
CUP24-0003
PC/1/27/2025
Page 1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 1210 DONNELLY AVENUE
PROJECT NO. CUP24-0003
WHEREAS, an application has been made by Lorene Pescareta, on behalf of Authorized
Agent for the Property Owner, Brett Barron, for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial recreation
– small scale use in an existing commercial building in the DAC (Donnelly Avenue Commercial) zoning
district, APN: 029-151-140; and
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame held a
duly noticed public hearing at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other
written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; and
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame reviewed
and considered a Categorical Exemption under Section 15301 (Class 1, Existing Facilities) for the
Project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame does here by resolve, find,
determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1: The project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Se ction 1530 1 (Class 1(a), Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines, which
states that interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and
electrical conveyances are exempt from environmental review.
SECTION 2: City of Burlingame Municipal Code (BMC) authorizes the Planning Commission
to grant a Conditional Use Permit upon making certain findings. The Planning Commission finds the
following:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS (BMC SECTION 25.66.060)
1. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
The proposed commercial recreation use (pilates studio) is consistent with the General Plan
and Downtown Specific Plan in that it adds to the current mix of uses in the downtown area
which is encouraged to promote a pedestrian-oriented district.
2. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other
applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Municipal Code.
The proposed use is allowed within the zoning district with a Conditional Use Permit and
complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Municipal Code.
3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity will be
compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity.
The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity will be
compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity in that the pilates studio is
located within an existing commercial building and there are no changes proposed to the
interior or exterior of the building.
CUP24-0003
PC/1/27/2025
Page 2
4. The site is physically suitable in terms of:
a. Its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use to
accommodate the use, and all fences, landscaping, loading, parking, spaces, walls,
yards, and other features required to adjust the use with the land and uses in the
neighborhood;
b. Streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to accommodate public
and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access;
c. Public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, etc.); and
d. The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and
disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.).
The site is physically suitable for the proposed use in that there is no change to the site or
commercial building required; there is no change to the existing street which has been
adequate to accommodate public and emergency vehicles; and the proposed use does not
impact public protection services or provision of utilities to the site.
5. The measure of site suitability shall be required to ensure that the type, density, and intensity
of use being proposed will not adversely affect the public convenience, health, interest, safety,
or general welfare, constitute a nuisance, or be materially injurious to the improvements,
persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located.
The proposed use will not adversely affect the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or
general welfare, constitute a nuisance, or be materially injurious to the improvements, persons,
property, or uses in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located in that the
proposed use includes a pilates studio within an existing commercial building.
SECTION 3: The Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame after conducting the public
hearing HEREBY APPROVES CUP24-0003 subject to the following conditions:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. that the small scale commercial recreation use (pilates studio) shall be limited to operating at
1210 Donnelly Avenue and within the designated areas shown on the plans submitted to the
Planning Division and date stamped December 11, 2024;
2. that the Conditional Use Permit shall apply only to a small scale commercial recreation use
(pilates studio) and shall become void if the small scale commercial recreation use ceases, is
replaced by a permitted use, or is ever expanded, demolished or destroyed by catastrophe or
natural disaster or for replacement; and
3. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire
Codes, in effect at time of business operating, as amended by the City of Burlingame.
SECTION 4: The Conditional Use Permit approval shall be subject to revocation if the applicant
fails to comply with the conditions listed herein at any time. If, at any time, the Community Development
Director or Planning Commission determine that there has been or may be a violation of the findings
or conditions of this approval, or of the Zoning Regulations, a public hearing may be held before the
Planning Commission to review this approval pursuant to Zoning Regulation Section 25.88.050. At
said hearing, the Planning Commission may add conditions, or recommend enforcement actions, or
CUP24-0003
PC/1/27/2025
Page 3
revoke the approval entirely, as necessary to ensure compliance with the Zoning Regulations, and to
provide for the health, safety, and general welfare of the community.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January 2025.
Chairperson
I, _____________ , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 27th day of January 2025 by the following vote:
Secretary
Exhibits:
Exhibit A - Project Plans dated December 11, 2024
6' - 1 13/16"8' - 10 13/16"55 SF
Restroom
5'31 SF
Storage
3' - 4 1/2"
4' - 5 5/8"2' - 10 3/16"
7' - 7 13/16"
98 SF
Laundry Room
14' - 9 1/4"13 SF
Closet
7' - 8 3/4"7' - 7 13/16"
59 SF
Storage
17' - 10 1/8"60' - 5 5/16"6' - 4 3/8"55'49 SF
Hall
1032 SF
Retail
Existing Floor Plan
19' - 2 1/8"9' - 11 1/8"2' - 10 3/8"
55 SF
Restroom
31 SF
Storage
98 SF
Laundry Room
14' - 9 1/4"13 SF
Closet
7' - 8 3/4"59 SF
Storage
17' - 10 1/8"60' - 5 5/16"6' - 4 3/8"55'49 SF
Hall
1032 SF
Studio
Proposed Floor Plan
19' - 2 1/8"
2' - 10 3/8"
Fire Extinguisher
Fire Extinguisher
Accessible Distance75' - 0"Reformer Machine
Min
2' - 6"Clear Space (Front or Rear Access)3' - 4 1/2"2' - 6"2' - 6"2' - 6"Rear Entrance
Carbon Monoxide Detector
3/16" = 1'-0"1 First Floor
Estimated Total Square Footage: 1,595 Sq. Ft.
Calculated from Outside Face of Exterior Wallls and Center Line of Demising Walls.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Notes on floor plan for Planning Division:
The previous space was used as a physical therapy office having 12 pieces of equipment
along with various weights, balls, bands and other similar equipment used in a physical
therapy.
Existing trash enclosure located in rear yard of building.
Notes on floor plan for Building Division:
There is no new construction proposed for 1210 Donnelly Ave.
There will be no exterior improvements or improvements in the public right of way
Fire Extinguisher Requirements
Proposed Use: Pilates Studio
Occupant Load: 7 People. (1 Instructor + 6 Clients)
Primary Use: Group B (Business) Occupancy
Hazard Classification: Light Hazard (minimal combustible materials and the
absence of flammable liquids or high-risk activities)
Two extinguishers; front and rear access points with a maximum travel distance
of 75 feet.
Front Entrance: Install one extinguisher near the main entrance in a visible and
accessible location.
Rear of the Building: Place the second extinguisher near the rear exit or a central
area of the studio, ensuring it is accessible within 75 feet of any point in the
space.
Type of Extinguishers:
Minimum rating: 2-A:10-B:C.
Height of Installation:
Top of the extinguisher: No more than 5 feet above the floor.
Bottom of the extinguisher: At least 4 inches above the floor.
Maximum Floor Area Allowance per Occupant:
Function of Space: Exercise Room
Occupant Load Factor = 50 gross
Total Gross Floor Area: ~1,337 sf
Occupant Load = 1,337/50 = 26.74 ~ 26
The Occupant Load would be 26 people
Project Address:
1210 Donnelly Ave, Burlingame, CA 94010
CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item: 8a Hearing Date: January 27, 2025
Project No. DSR24-0016
Applicant Mike Ma, MArch Design
Property Owner Jason Ni
Staff ‘Amelia Kolokihakaufisi, Associate Planner
Location 628 Vernon Way
APN: 029-182-170
General Plan Designation Low Density Residential
Zoning R-1 (Low Density Residential)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Review of an application for Major Design Review, Variances for front and side setbacks, and Special
Permits for plate heights for a first and second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling in the
R-1 (Low Density Residential) zoning district.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is an interior lot and currently contains a one-story single-unit dwelling and an
attached one -car garage. The applicant proposes to demolish portions of the front side of the house
to widen the existing garage by four feet and reduce the size of the front porch by 18 SF. Also
proposed is an addition to the rear of the house and a new, 1,169 SF second story. At the front right
side of the house, 538 SF of existing living area is being converted into a new attached ADU. The
total proposed floor area would be 2,699 SF (0.54 FAR), where 2,700 SF (0.54 FAR) is the maximum
allowed (including 538 SF ADU exemption).
The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for a 10’-0” plate height at the first floor great room
located at the rear of the house (10’-0” proposed where 9’-0” is the maximum allowed on the first
floor). A Special Permit is also requested for the new second story plate height (8’-6” proposed where
8’-0” is the maximum allowed).
The existing one-car attached garage has a nonconforming front setback of 16’-8” (25’-0” minimum
front setback required for an attached one-car garage). The applicant proposes to widen the garage
by 4’-0” along the right side and maintain the existing front setback; the garage would still be
considered a one-car garage. Therefore, a Variance for front setback is required for the new portion
of the attached garage (16’-8” proposed where 25’-0” is the minimum required).
Also requested are Variances for left and right side setbacks for the proposed addition at the rear of
the house. The length of the wall extension along the left side is approximately 10’-2” and would be
setback 3’-2” from the property line where 4’-0” is the minimum required. The length of the wall
extension along the right side is 2’-5” and would be setback 2’-8” from the property line where 4’-0”
is the minimum required.
With the proposed project, the number of bedrooms would increase from two to three. Two parking
spaces, one of which must be covered, are required on site. The attached garage provides one
covered parking space (15’-3” x 18’-5” clear interior dimension) and one uncovered parking space
(9’ x 18’) is provided in the driveway. No parking is required for the ADU because it is within an
existing primary residence. Therefore, the project is in compliance with off-street parking
requirements.
PC/01/27 /2025
Project No. DSR24-0016
628 Vernon Way
Page 2
The applicant is requesting the following applications:
Major Design Review for a first and second story addition to an existing single-unit dwelling
(C.S. 25.68.020.C.1.b.);
Special Permit for plate height on the first floor (10’-0” proposed where 9’-0” is the maximum
allowed) (C.S. 25.10.030 and 25.78.020.A.6.);
Special Permit for plate height on the second floor (8’-6” proposed where 8’-0” is the
maximum allowed) (C.S. 25.10.030 and 25.78.020.A.6.);
Variance for front setback to attached garage (16’-8” proposed where 25’-0” is minimum
required) (C.S. 25.10.0 50.B.2.c.i.);
Variance for left side setback (3’-2” proposed where 4’-0” is minimum required) (C.S.
25.10.030); and
Variance for right side setback (2’-8” proposed where 4’-0” is minimum required) (C.S.
25.10.030).
ANALYSIS
Table 1: Project Information
1 (0.32 x 5,000 SF) + 1,100 SF = 2,700 SF (0.54 FAR)
2 Variance for front setback required (16’-8” proposed where 25’-0” is required).
3 Variance for left side setback required (3’-2” proposed where 4’-0” is required).
4 Variance for right side setback required (2’-8” proposed where 4’-0” is required).
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ’D
Front Setback (1st flr):
(2nd flr):
Attached garage:
16’-8”
n/a
16’-8”
no change
22’-9”
16’-8” 2
17’-8” (block average)
20’-0”
25’-0”
Side Setback (left):
(right):
3’-2”
2’-8”
3’-2” 3
2’-8” 4
4'-0"
4'-0"
Rear Setback
(1st flr):
(2nd flr):
32’-0”
n/a
28’-11”
40’-11”
15'-0"
20'-0"
Lot Coverage: 1,768 SF
35.4%
1,868 SF
37.4%
2,000 SF
40%
FAR: 1,695 SF
0.34 FAR
2,699 SF
0.54 FAR
2,700 SF ¹
0.54 FAR
PC/01/27 /2025
Project No. DSR24-0016
628 Vernon Way
Page 3
5 Special Permit for plate height on first floor (10’-0” proposed where 9’-0” is the maximum
allowed).
6 Special Permit for plate height on second floor (8’-6” proposed where 8’-0” is the maximum
allowed).
Summary of Proposed Exterior Materials:
• Windows: fiberglass
• Doors: wood front door and garage door, and aluminum frame sliding doors
• Siding: smooth cement plaster and stone veneer
• Roof: concrete tile
Design Review Criteria
The criteria for design review as established in Ordinance No. 2000 adopted by the City Council on
December 6, 2021 are outlined as follows:
1. Consistency with any applicable design guidelines;
2. Compatibility of the architectural style with that of the existing character of the
neighborhood;
3. Respect for the parking and garage patterns in the neighborhood;
4. Architectural style and consistency and mass and bulk of structures, including accessory
structures;
5. Interface of the proposed structure with the structures on adjacent properties;
6. Landscaping and its proportion to mass and bulk of structural components; and
7. In the case of an addition, compatibility with the architectural style and character of the
existing structure as remodeled.
Environmental Review
The project is Categorically Exempt from review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), per Section 15301 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that additions to existing
structures are exempt from environmental review, provided that the addition will not result in an
increase of more than 50% of the floor area of the structures before the addition.
EXISTING PROPOSED ALLOWED/REQ’D
Off-Street Parking:
1 covered
(9’-5” x 19’-1” clear
interior)
1 uncovered
(9’ x 18’)
1 covered
(15’-3” x 18’-5” clear
interior)
1 uncovered
(9’ x 18’)
1 covered
(10’ x 18’ clear
interior)
1 uncovered
(9' x 18')
Building Height: 18’-8” 27’-4” 30'-0"
Plate Height: 8’-0”
n/a
9’-0” and 10’-0” 5
8’-6” 6
9’-0”
8’-0”
DH Envelope: n/a Complies C.S. 25.26.075
PC/01/27 /2025
Project No. DSR24-0016
628 Vernon Way
Page 4
Attachments:
Area Map
Proposed Plans dated December 20, 2024
628 Vernon Way
300’ noticing
APN: 029-182-170
RECEIVEDCITY OF BURLINGAMECDD-PLANNING DIVISION12.20.24
Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs)Construction projects are required to implement the stormwater best management practices (BMP) on this page, as they apply to your project, all year long.Non-Hazardous MaterialsBerm and cover stockpiles of sand, dirt or other construction material with tarps when rain is forecast or if not actively being used within 14 days.Use (but don’t overuse) reclaimed water for dust control. Hazardous MaterialsLabel all hazardous materials and hazardous wastes (such as pesticides, paints, thinners, solvents, fuel, oil, and antifreeze) in accordance with city, county, state and federal regulations.Store hazardous materials and wastes in water tight containers, store in appropriate secondary containment, and cover them at the end of every work day or during wet weather or when rain is forecast.Follow manufacturer’s application instructions for hazardous materials and be careful not to use more than necessary. Do not apply chemicals outdoors when rain is forecast within 24 hours.Arrange for appropriate disposal of all hazardous wastes. Waste ManagementCover waste disposal containers securely with tarps at the end of every work day and during wet weather. Check waste disposal containers frequently for leaks and to make sure they are not overfi lled. Never hose down a dumpster on the construction site. Clean or replace portable toilets, and inspect them frequently for leaks and spills. Dispose of all wastes and debris properly. Recycle materials and wastes that can be recycled (such as asphalt, concrete, aggregate base materials, wood, gyp board, pipe, etc.) Dispose of liquid residues from paints, thinners, solvents, glues, and cleaning fl uids as hazardous waste.Construction Entrances and PerimeterEstablish and maintain effective perimeter controls and stabilize all construction entrances and exits to suffi ciently control erosion and sediment discharges from site and tracking off site.Sweep or vacuum any street tracking immediately and secure sediment source to prevent further tracking. Never hose down streets to clean up tracking.Materials & Waste ManagementEquipment Management & Spill ControlMaintenance and ParkingDesignate an area, fi tted with appropriate BMPs, for vehicle and equipment parking and storage.Perform major maintenance, repair jobs, and vehicle and equipment washing off site.If refueling or vehicle maintenance must be done onsite, work in a bermed area away from storm drains and over a drip pan or drop cloths big enough to collect fl uids. Recycle or dispose of fl uids as hazardous waste. If vehicle or equipment cleaning must be done onsite, clean with water only in a bermed area that will not allow rinse water to run into gutters, streets, storm drains, or surface waters.Do not clean vehicle or equipment onsite using soaps, solvents, degreasers, or steam cleaning equipment.Spill Prevention and Control Keep spill cleanup materials (e.g., rags, absorbents and cat litter) available at the construction site at all times. Inspect vehicles and equipment frequently for and repair leaks promptly. Use drip pans to catch leaks until repairs are made.Clean up spills or leaks immediately and dispose of cleanup materials properly. Do not hose down surfaces where fl uids have spilled. Use dry cleanup methods (absorbent materials, cat litter, and/or rags). Sweep up spilled dry materials immediately. Do not try to wash them away with water, or bury them. Clean up spills on dirt areas by digging up and properly disposing of contaminated soil.Report signifi cant spills immediately. You are required by law to report all signifi cant releases of hazardous materials, including oil. To report a spill: 1) Dial 911 or your local emergency response number, 2) Call the Governor’s Offi ce of Emergency Services Warning Center, (800) 852-7550 (24 hours). EarthmovingSchedule grading and excavation work during dry weather.Stabilize all denuded areas, install and maintain temporary erosion controls (such as erosion control fabric or bonded fi ber matrix) until vegetation is established.Remove existing vegetation only when absolutely necessary, and seed or plant vegetation for erosion control on slopes or where construction is not immediately planned. Prevent sediment from migrating offsite and protect storm drain inlets, gutters, ditches, and drainage courses by installing and maintaining appropriate BMPs, such as fi ber rolls, silt fences, sediment basins, gravel bags, berms, etc.Keep excavated soil on site and transfer it to dump trucks on site, not in the streets.Contaminated SoilsIf any of the following conditions are observed, test for contamination and contact the Regional Water Quality Control Board:Unusual soil conditions, discoloration, -or odor.Abandoned underground tanks. -Abandoned wells -Buried barrels, debris, or trash. -Discharges of groundwater or captured runoff from dewatering operations must be properly managed and disposed. When possible send dewatering discharge to landscaped area or sanitary sewer. If discharging to the sanitary sewer call your local wastewater treatment plant. Divert run-on water from offsite away from all disturbed areas. When dewatering, notify and obtain approval from the local municipality before discharging water to a street gutter or storm drain. Filtration or diversion through a basin, tank, or sediment trap may be required.In areas of known or suspected contamination, call your local agency to determine whether the ground water must be tested. Pumped groundwater may need to be collected and hauled off-site for treatment and proper disposal.DewateringAvoid paving and seal coating in wet weather or when rain is forecast, to prevent materials that have not cured from contacting stormwater runoff.Cover storm drain inlets and manholes when applying seal coat, tack coat, slurry seal, fog seal, etc.Collect and recycle or appropriately dispose of excess abrasive gravel or sand. Do NOT sweep or wash it into gutters.Do not use water to wash down fresh asphalt concrete pavement.Sawcutting & Asphalt/Concrete RemovalProtect nearby storm drain inlets when saw cutting. Use fi lter fabric, catch basin inlet fi lters, or gravel bags to keep slurry out of the storm drain system. Shovel, abosorb, or vacuum saw-cut slurry and dispose of all waste as soon as you are fi nished in one location or at the end of each work day (whichever is sooner!).If sawcut slurry enters a catch basin, clean it up immediately. Store concrete, grout, and mortar away from storm drains or waterways, and on pallets under cover to protect them from rain, runoff, and wind. Wash out concrete equipment/trucks offsite or in a designated washout area, where the water will fl ow into a temporary waste pit, and in a manner that will prevent leaching into the underlying soil or onto surrounding areas. Let concrete harden and dispose of as garbage.When washing exposed aggregate, prevent washwater from entering storm drains. Block any inlets and vacuum gutters, hose washwater onto dirt areas, or drain onto a bermed surface to be pumped and disposed of properly. Painting Cleanup and RemovalNever clean brushes or rinse paint containers into a street, gutter, storm drain, or stream.For water-based paints, paint out brushes to the extent possible, and rinse into a drain that goes to the sanitary sewer. Never pour paint down a storm drain.For oil-based paints, paint out brushes to the extent possible and clean with thinner or solvent in a proper container. Filter and reuse thinners and solvents. Dispose of excess liquids as hazardous waste.Paint chips and dust from non-hazardous dry stripping and sand blasting may be swept up or collected in plastic drop cloths and disposed of as trash.Chemical paint stripping residue and chips and dust from marine paints or paints containing lead, mercury, or tributyltin must be disposed of as hazardous waste. Lead based paint removal requires a state-certifi ed contractor.Painting & Paint RemovalConcrete, Grout & Mortar ApplicationProtect stockpiled landscaping materials from wind and rain by storing them under tarps all year-round.Stack bagged material on pallets and under cover. Discontinue application of any erodible landscape material within 2 days before a forecast rain event or during wet weather.LandscapingPaving/Asphalt WorkStorm drain polluters may be liable for fi nes of up to $10,000 per day!
FFE 103.02 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxVERNON WAY ( 50' R/W )R E V I S I O N S :P R O J E C T :
NI RESIDENCE
NEW 2-STORY RESIDENCE & ATTACHED ADU
628 VERNON WAY
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
LAYOUT AND
MATERIAL PLANL1.009/30/202611/06/2024
FFE 103.02 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxVERNON WAY ( 50' R/W )English lavenderGreat VelvetBoxwoodThe OriginalRebloomingHydrangeaThe Original RebloomingHydrangeaGreat VelvetBoxwoodEnglish lavenderThe OriginalRebloomingHydrangeaStrawberry treeStrawberry treeEnglish LaurelStrawberry tree(E)Maple treeDeergrassGreat VelvetBoxwood(E)AmericanSweetgum tree(E)AmericanSweetgum tree(E)AmericanSweetgum treeR E V I S I O N S :P R O J E C T :
NI RESIDENCE
NEW 2-STORY RESIDENCE & ATTACHED ADU
628 VERNON WAY
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
PLANTING PLANL2.009/30/202611/06/202409/30/202611/06/2024
PLANTING SCHEDULESYMBOLBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPREADHEIGHTWATERUSE(based onWUCOLS IV)COUNTSArbutus unedoStrawberry tree24" BOX15-20 ft15-20 ftMODERATE3Prunus laurocerasusEnglish Laurel15 GAL8 ft12 ftLOW11Buxus 'Green Velvet'Great VelvetBoxwood5 GAL3 ft3 ftLOW15Hydrangea macrophylla‘Bailmer’Endless Summer®The OriginalRebloomingHydrangea5 GAL4-6 ft3-4 ftMODERATE19Muhlenbergia rigensDeergrass1 GAL3 ft3 ftLOW9Lavandula angustifoliaEnglish lavender1 GAL1 ft1 ftLOW24R E V I S I O N S :P R O J E C T :
NI RESIDENCE
NEW 2-STORY RESIDENCE & ATTACHED ADU
628 VERNON WAY
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
PLANTING
LEGENDL2.109/30/202611/06/202409/30/202611/06/2024
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
Supplemental Information Packet
Agenda Item #8a
628 Vernon Way - Project No. DSR24-0016
Application for Major Design Review, Variances for front and side
setbacks, and Special Permit for plate height for a first and second story
addition to an existing single-unit dwelling in the R-1 (Low Density
Residential) zoning district.
Meeting of January 27, 2025
Supplemental Packet Date: January 27, 2025
Supplemental Information:
Any agenda related public comment documents received and distributed to a majority of the Planning
Commissioners after the Agenda Packet is published are included in Supplemental Packets.
Supplemental Packets are produced as needed. The Supplemental Packet is available at the public
hearing in Council Chambers, City Hall, 501 Primrose Road as well as the City's website -
www.burlingame.org/planningcommission/agenda
From:Public Comment
To:Public Comment
Subject:FW: Public Comment for 628 Vernon Way
Date:Monday, January 27, 2025 3:39:49 PM
From: Francisca Hawkins
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 3:31 PM
To: Public Comment <publiccomment@burlingameorgnew.onmicrosoft.com>
Cc: Francisca Hawkins
Subject: Re: Public Comment for 628 Vernon Way
Thank you. I appreciate your quick reply and addressing my questions.
Plate Height Adjustment is my main concern as it will directly impact the
positioning of the windows even if the overall structure is within the height
limits for a roof line. So, if this is the first review, then I will continue to
monitor - but if there is one concern this is it.
Thank you again.
Francisca
From:
To:Public Comment
Cc:
Subject:1/27/25 Meeting Agenda Comments - 628 Vernon Way
Date:Monday, January 27, 2025 3:26:13 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
image007.png
Hello.
I am writing to express my feedback regarding tonight's meeting. Agenda item #8, major
design review, variances, and special permits at 628 Vernon Way.
My name is Dianne Ehrlich, and I live at 627 Lexington Way.
I'd like to express my concern about allowing this major design review to move forward.
Although the house is not directly behind me, building another story and building out will
create a lack of privacy for me as well as create significant shade which will take away sun
from my backyard/house. This is deeply concerning and upsetting to me.
I have lived in this house for over 25 years, and should the major design review, variances and
special permits be granted, I will lose my privacy, and the shade will not only be a hindrance to
my beautiful garden, but it will also be depressing.
Thank you for reviewing my comments and taking into consideration what this will do to not
only me, but all other neighbors near 628 Vernon Way.
Dianne
Dianne Ehrlich