HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda FS - 2001.03.26AGENDA
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
March 26, 2001
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. MINUTES March 12, 2001 meeting
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
V. FROM THE FLOOR
VI. STUDY ITEMS
There are no Study items for review.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
Commission votes on the motion to adopt.
Ia. 1637 Westmoor Road - zoned R-1 - application for design review, side setback variance and special
permit for height for a first and second story addition (Daniel Biermann, applicant and designer; Dean
and Ursula Williams, property owner) (51 noticed).
lb. 1219 Vancouver Avenue- zoned R-1 — application for design review and special permits for height
and for an attached garage for a first and second story addition (gamin and Natalie Forood, applicants
and property owners; Gary Diebel, Diebel & Company, architect) (44 noticed) (item continued).
le. 1532 Vancouver Avenue —zoned R-1 —application for design review and special permit for declining
height envelope for a first and second story addition (Robert Allen Williams, applicant and architect;
Mark and Katina Cosenza, property owners) (66 noticed).
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
2. 2606 Summit Drive — zoned R-1 — application for design review and hillside area construction permit
for a first and second story addition (Chris Ngai and Yolanda Yeung, applicants and property owners;
Darosa & Associates, architect) (continued from March 12, 2001 meeting) (22 noticed).
3. 2812 Easton Drive - zoned R-1 — application for negative declaration and creek enclosure permit to
extend an existing concrete culvert in order to provide a driveway turn -around (Basil N. Mufarreh,
applicant and property owner) (continued to April 9, 2001 meeting) (32 noticed).
4. 1447 Burlingame Avenue — zoned C-1 Subarea A - application for conditional use permit amendment
for a full -service restaurant (Igbal Serang, architect; Elio D. Urzo, applicant; Bank of America Nt Sa Et
— Al, property owner) (45 noticed).
City of Burlingame Planning Commission March 26, 2001
5. Commercial Design Review — Ordinance to extend design review to some buildings in the C-1 and C-2
zoning districts.
6. Second Unit Amnesty — Ordinance to allow amnesty for some second units in the R-1 zone district.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
7. 1532 Howard Avenue - zoned R-1— application for design review for a first and second story addition
(Matthew Bolak, designer, and Deniz Salon, applicant and property owners) (70 noticed).
8. 21 Dwight Road - zoned R-1- application for design review for a second story addition (Randy Grange,
TRG Architects, architect, applicant and property owner) (59 noticed).
9. 1228 Balboa Avenue — zoned R-1 — application for front setback variance for a porch addition
(Kenneth Roby, applicant and Dawned Jamshidnejad, property owner) (59 noticed).
10. 1220 Bayshore Highway, zoned C-4 — seeping session for environmental review of a proposed 4-story,
16,000 SF office building (Roger Hay, Smith Group, architect; Robert Wadell, applicant and property
owner) (10 noticed).
X. PLANNER REPORTS
Review of City Council regular meeting of March 19, 2001.
Appointment of Design Reviewer
Discussion of Sign Code Issues
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Note. An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council until the end of the next regularly scheduled Council meeting on April 1, 2001.
In order to be effective, appeals must be in writing and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of $250, which includes noticing costs. If the Planning,
Commission's action has not been appealed or called up for review by the Council by the end of their meeting on April 2, 2001, the action becomes final. If
appeals are directed in writing to the City Clerk at City Hallprior to the close of the working day on April 2, 2001, attendance at the Council meeting is not
required for setting an appeal. pceNon03.26/posted03n1101