HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda FS - 2001.03.12AGENDA
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
March 12, 2001
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. MINUTES February 24 and February 26, 2001 meetings
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
V. FROM THE FLOOR
VI. STUDY ITEMS
1. Commercial Design Review — Ordinance to extend design review to some buildings in the C-1 and C-2
zoning districts.
2. 1447 Burlingame Avenue — zoned C-1 Subarea A — application for conditional use permit amendment
for a full -service restaurant (Igbal Serang, architect; Elio D. Urzo, applicant; Bank of Amercia Nt Sa Et
Al, property owner).
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
Commission votes on the motion to adopt.
3a. 2627 Easton Drive - zoned R-1 - application for design review and side setback variance for a first and
second floor addition (Martin Dreiling, CSS Architecture, applicant and architect; Tricia Godowski,
property owner) (43 noticed).
3b. 164 Pepper Avenue - zoned R-1 - application for design review for a first and second floor addition
and a new detached garage (Randy Grange, applicant and architect; Gregg and Kris Hurley, property
owners) (48 noticed).
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
4. 2812 Easton Drive - zoned R-1 — application for negative declaration and creek enclosure permit to
extend an existing concrete culvert in order to provide a driveway turn -around (Basil N. Mufarreh,
applicant and property owner) (32 noticed).
5. 2606 Summit Drive - zoned R-1 — application for design review and hillside area construction permit
for a first and second story addition (Chris Ngai and Yolanda Yeung, applicants and property owners;
Darosa & Associates, architect) (continued to March 26, 2001 meeting) (22 noticed).
6. 1219 Vancouver Avenue - zoned R-1 — application for design review and special permit for height for
a first and second story addition (Ramin and Natalie Forood, applicants and property owners; Gary
Diebel, Diebel & Company, architect) (44 noticed).
City of Burlingame Planning Cornnfission March 12, 2001
7. 1228 Bernal Avenue — zoned R-1 — application for design review amendment (James and Michelle
Delia, applicants and property owners; JD & Associates, designer) (61 noticed).
8. 999 Howard Avenue — zoned C-2 — application for a mitigated negative declaration for a new three-
story office building (Jesse Morgan, Howard Myrtle Storage LLC, applicant and property owner; Niles
Tanakatsubo, TSH Architects, architect) (51 noticed).
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
9. 1324 Drake Avenue — zoned R-1 — application for design review and special permit for height for a
new two-story single family dwelling and detached garage (Tzer Hung, applicant and property owner;
JD & Associates, designer) (60 noticed).
10. 1532 Vancouver Avenue — zoned R-1 — application for design review and special permit for declining
height envelope for a first and second story addition (Robert Allen Williams, applicant and architect;
Mark and Katina Cosenza, property owners) (66 noticed).
11. 1480 Benito Avenue — zoned R-1 — application for design review for a first and second story addition
(Dave Howell, applicant and architect; Craig and Denise Fawcett, property owners) 38 noticed).
12. 1424 Castillo Avenue — zoned R-1 — application for design review and special permit for an attached
garage for a first and second story addition (Albert Shilaimon, applicant and property owner; Arismiz
and Associates, Inc., architect) (67 noticed).
X. PLANNER REPORTS
Review of City Council regular meeting of March 5, 2001, and Joint City Council/Planning
Commission meeting of February 24, 2001.
Review Open Space Element of the General Plan.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Note. An action by the Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council until the end of the next regularly scheduled Council meeting on March 19,
2001. In order to be effective, appeals must be in writing and must be accompanied by an appeal fee of $250, which includes noticing costs. If the Planning
Commission's action has not been appealed or called up for review by the Council by the end of their meeting on March 19, 2001, the action becomes final.
If appeals are directed in writing to the City Clerk at City Hall prior to the close of the working day on March 19, 2001, attendance at the Council meeting is
not required for setting an appeal. AGCNDA03.121posteda3107101
2