Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - CC - 2024.11.18 (Regular Meeting) 1 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Approved Minutes Regular City Council Meeting on November 18, 2024 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in person and via Zoom at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG The pledge of allegiance was led by the Heathcote family. 3. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Brownrigg, Colson, Lee, Pappajohn, Stevenson MEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. REQUEST FOR AB 2249 REMOTE PARTICIPATION There was no request. 5. REPORT OUT FROM CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. 6. UPCOMING EVENTS Mayor Colson reviewed upcoming events in the city. 7. PRESENTATIONS a. VETERAN’S DAY CERTIFICATE PRESENTATION Mayor Colson presented a proclamation to Kirkland Heathcote for his service in the Navy from 1959-1962. Council thanked Kirkland Heathcote for his service. 2 b. YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE (“YAC”) PRESENTATION Recreation Coordinator Alex Sheldon introduced the Youth Advisory Committee (“YAC”) to give their bi- annual update. YAC is comprised of 13 seventh through twelfth grade students that live and/or go to school in Burlingame. The following individuals are members of YAC for the 2024-25 year: Sophia Bella, Hope DiLaura, Katie Friedman, Charlotte Guglielmi, Kylie Min, Ellie Liu, Kristyn Lee, Dylan Lachance, Hannah Osinski, Penny Reed, Audrey Wei, Adrian Yiensu, and Zach Wong. YAC explained that their initiative for the year is centered around life skills including the following three categories: home economics, sustainability, and youth civic engagement. YAC representatives reviewed upcoming events that they will be participating in, including: the Tree Lighting, December Kids Night Out, and a First Aid Training. Council thanked the YAC representatives for their hard work. c. ONESHORELINE RESILIENCY PROJECT PRESENTATION OneShoreline CEO Len Materman explained that State law established the San Mateo County Flood & Sea Level Rise Resiliency District (“OneShoreline) on January 1, 2020, as the first government agency to plan and build regional resilience to the water-related impacts of climate change: flooding, sea level rise, groundwater rise, coastal erosion, and drought. Mr. Materman reviewed OneShoreline’s 2024 – 2025 priorities: • Plan land use, private development, and public infrastructure for future climate-driven conditions and with regional resilience efforts • Advance projects that align long-term resilience for developed, natural, and recreational areas across jurisdictions • Provide early warning of, and reduce the impacts of, today’s extreme storms made worse by rising tides • Develop ongoing local funding streams to sustain these efforts long-term and leverage outside funding Mr. Materman stated that OneShoreline’s overall project goal is long-term climate resilience against sea level rise and extreme storms for developed, natural, and public access areas. He discussed constraints to this goal including lack of available land to build protections on without impacting private property. Mr. Materman reviewed the Millbrae and Burlingame Shoreline Resilience Project’s progress to date: • March 2022 – hired design consultant team, project kickoff • July 2022 to September 2022 – collected data and developed first set of project alternatives 3 • October 2023 – completed feasibility analysis of first set of conceptual alternatives, released NOP of an EIR to initiate CEQA process • November 2023 to May 2024 – reviewed NOP comments, explored additional alternatives, hired outreach consultant • August 2024 - presented outreach and engagement plan to OneShoreline board • September 2024 to November 2024 - began vetting updated draft alternatives and criteria with City partners, landowners, and permitting agencies • October 2024 to December 2024 – public engagement on updated draft project alternatives and criteria • Spring and Summer 2025 – analyze and establish LEDPA, outreach, begin EIR Mr. Materman stated that the NOP comments focused on the impacts to the lagoon. He explained that in response to these comments, OneShoreline does not plan to carry the large offshore lagoon alternative forward. Mr. Materman stated that OneShoreline developed three alternatives and that the major differences between the three lie in the area between the airport and Easton Creek. He then reviewed the three alternatives: Alternative A Remain on Shoreline Alternative B Park Tunnels Alternative C Nearshore Waterway Coastal Flood Protection Manage creek water at each creek mouth (5 pump stations) Manage creek water through tunnels (two pump stations) Manage creek water through waterway (two pump stations) Habitat Functionality Living shoreline Living shoreline Living shoreline and fish passage Public Access and Recreation Bay trail improvements, two new or improved shoreline parks Bay trail improvements, three new or improved shoreline parks Bay trail improvements, one new or improved shoreline parks Mr. Materman reviewed the proposed criteria to evaluate which alternative to select: • Flood Protection o Does the alternative provide the required coastal flood protection benefits? o Does it allow stormwater to drain? o Does it increase or reduce flooding from groundwater rise? • Habitat o Does the alternative harm or benefit current and future species habitat? o Does it impact water quality? • Public Access and Recreation o What does the alternative look like and how would one experience it? o What benefits or impacts does the alternative have on the Bay Trail and Bay recreation? • Implementation 4 o How will the alternative be implemented? o Is it feasible to obtain the land rights and permits necessary to construct? o What is the alternative’s cost and schedule? • Operations and Maintenance o How will the alternative be operated and maintained? o How will this change as sea levels rise and storms become more extreme? • SFO o Does the alternative increase the likelihood of bird strikes? Mr. Materman reviewed the outreach process that OneShoreline was undertaking regarding the three alternatives: • Ongoing vetting with City staff, permitting agencies, and landowners • October 28 – Presentation to OneShoreline Board • November 12 – Presentation to Millbrae City Council • November 16 – Burlingame Community Workship • November 17 – Public shoreline walking tour • November 18 – Presentation to Burlingame City Council • November 19 – Millbrae Community Workshop • December 4 – Online Community Meeting Mr. Materman discussed the work that OneShoreline would be undertaking in 2025: • January to April o Analyze community feedback on draft alternatives, refine alternatives, identify the preliminary Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) in coordination with permitting agencies • May to June o Outreach and engagement on preferred alternative (LEDPA) • Summer o Complete 30% design, begin draft environmental impact report (EIR) Councilmember Lee asked if any of these alternatives are acceptable to SFO. Mr. Materman replied that SFO has not yet voiced an opinion on the alternatives. Vice Mayor Stevenson asked about OneShoreline’s messaging to the public. Mayor Colson stated that the City and OneShoreline should ensure that the public knows that if actions aren’t taken, then 40% of the City’s revenue (TOT collected from hotels on the Bay) would be underwater. Councilmember Brownrigg concurred with Mayor Colson. He explained that he hasn’t found people doubting that the City needs to do this. He wondered how people will react once the cost of the project is known. 5 Mr. Materman stated that OneShoreline is stressing that everyone is in this together. Vice Mayor Stevenson asked what percentage of the shoreline can be addressed through development agreements. OneShoreline representative, Mr. Anderson, replied that roughly 50 to 60 percent of the shoreline is privately owned. Councilmember Brownrigg asked how much time will be bought with the sea level rise upgrades before they need to be addressed again. Mr. Materman replied that the proposed upgrades would take the shoreline to 2100 before potentially being addressed again. Mayor Colson asked if the plans address the ground water. Mr. Materman replied that groundwater is harder to address. Mayor Colson opened the item for public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Brownrigg suggested that OneShoreline create messaging discussing the potential property and land value loss if sea level rise is not addressed. Mayor Colson hoped more people would attend these meetings as this is a topic that will impact everyone. Council thanked Mr. Materman and OneShoreline. 8. PUBLIC COMMENTS Arjun Sharma discussed the need for cricket facilities in Burlingame. 9. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Colson asked the Councilmembers and the public if they wished to remove any item from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Brownrigg pulled items 9i and 9n. Vice Mayor Stevenson pulled item 9f. Councilmember Lee pulled item 9l. Vice Mayor Stevenson made a motion to adopt items 9a, 9b, 9c, 9d, 9e, 9g, 9h, 9j, 9k, 9m, and 9o; seconded by Councilmember Lee. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. a. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE OCTOBER 21, 2024 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING City Clerk Hassel-Shearer requested Council approval of the City Council meeting minutes for the October 21, 2024 Regular City Council Meeting. b. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE NOVEMBER 4, 2024 CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION 6 City Clerk Hassel-Shearer requested Council approval of City Council meeting minutes for November 4, 2024 City Council Closed Session c. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 4, 2024 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING City Clerk Hassel-Shearer requested Council approval of City Council meeting minutes for November 4, 2024 Regular City Council Meeting. d. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 12, 2024 SPECIAL MEETING City Clerk Hassel-Shearer requested Council approval of City Council meeting minutes for November 12, 2024 Special City Council Meeting. e. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FOR THE NOVEMBER 13, 2024 CLOSED SESSION City Clerk Hassel-Shearer requested Council approval of City Council meeting minutes for November 13, 2024 City Council Closed Session. f. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8.18.040 OF CHAPTER 8.18 OF TITLE 8 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE PERMANENT A PREVIOUSLY TEMPORARY BAN ON SMOKING IN THE BROADWAY AND DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME PEDESTRIAN RETAIL DISTRICTS (CEQA DETERMINATION: EXEMPT PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15378 AND 15061(B)(3)) Vice Mayor Stevenson asked about transferring retail businesses. ACA Spansail replied that the Vice Mayor’s concerns were addressed in item 10b. Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Ordinance Number 2033: seconded by Vice Mayor Stevenson. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. g. ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13.36.040 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH A TWO-HOUR PARKING RESTRICTION ON THE EAST SIDE OF CALIFORNIA DRIVE BETWEEN CARMELITA AVENUE AND 300 FEET SOUTH OF CARMELITA AVENUE; CEQA DETERMINATION: EXEMPT PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15378, 15061(B)(3 DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Ordinance Number 2034. 7 h. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT #1 TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT WITH COASTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLP IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,634 FOR THE MILLS CANYON SLIDE REPAIR, CITY PROJECT NO. 86780 DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 136-2024. i. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT BUILDING SERVICES WITH TRUE NORTH COMPLIANCE SERVICES, INC., TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY $540,000, FOR A TOTAL COMPENSATION OF $1,640,000; AND AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC., TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY $250,000, FOR A TOTAL COMPENSATION OF $1,810,000, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025. Councilmember Brownrigg asked how the City ensures that the building services provided by the consultant are acceptable. CDD Zayer replied that the off-site plan checkers have been working with the City for approximately ten years, and staff is very familiar with them. She noted the contractors are very integrated into the department. Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 137-2024 and Resolution Number 138-2024; seconded by Councilmember Pappajohn. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. j. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH GARDEN GUIDANCE LLC. FOR ARBORIST SERVICES TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY $200,000, FOR A TOTAL COMPENSATION NOT TO EXCEED $298,800. Parks and Recreation Director Glomstad requested Council adopt Resolution Number 139-2024. k. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATUS OF IMPACT FEES COLLECTED AS OF JUNE 30, 2024, PURSUANT TO THE MITIGATION FEE ACT (GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66000 ET SEQ.) Finance Director Yu-Scott requested Council adopt Resolution Number 140-2024. l. APPROVAL OF QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2024 Councilmember Lee asked about expanding what is covered in the Quarterly Investment Report. Mayor Colson concurred. 8 Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Lee made a motion to approve the Quarterly Investment Report; seconded by Mayor Colson. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. m. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SAN MATEO CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS COUNTYWIDE LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN DPW Murtuza requested Council adopt Resolution Number 141-2024. n. UPDATE ON PUBLIC COMMENT SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL FOR CITY COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS REGARDING CREATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET INSTEAD OF READING PUBLIC COMMENT EMAILS DURING A MEETING Councilmember Brownrigg voiced support for the proposal and noted that this would be a change in the way the community engages with the Council and public meetings. City Clerk Hassel-Shearer replied in the affirmative. She explained that public comments in the form of emails will no longer be read. Instead, the emails received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be compiled into a supplemental packet and shared with the Council. Vice Mayor Stevenson voiced support for the change. Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment. No one spoke. Councilmember Pappajohn made a motion to update the process for public comments submitted via email; seconded by Councilmember Lee. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. o. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FIVE-YEAR AGREEMENT WITH RINGCENTRAL FOR A CLOUD HOSTED PHONE SYSTEM IN THE AMOUNT OF $244,390 WITH THE OPTION TO RENEW SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES ANNUALLY; EXECUTE AMENDMENTS TO ADD, CHANGE, OR REMOVE LICENSES WITH RINGCENTRAL AS NEEDED; AND EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PACKET FUSION FOR THE PHONE SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT MANAGEMENT, CONFIGURATIONS, TRAINING, AND ONSITE ASSISTANCE IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,380 Finance Director Yu-Scott requested Council adopt Resolution Number 142-2024. 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF BURLINGAME FY2024-25 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE. 9 Finance Director Yu-Scott explained that the City traditionally approves the Master Fee Schedule as part of the budget process. She stated that the City Council reviewed the proposed fees for Fiscal Year 2024-25 on April 15, 2024, and approved the Master Fee Schedule on May 6, 2024 (Resolution No. 063-2024). She noted that subsequently, staff discovered that there are a few fees missing from the schedule, and some of the fee descriptions are not clear. She summarized that this item is mainly administrative clean up. Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment. Eugene stated that the fee for playing music on the sidewalk is too high. (Comment submitted via publiccomment@burlingame.org) John voiced concern about the required fee to play music on the sidewalk. (Comment submitted via publiccomment@burlingame.org) Mayor Colson closed public comment. Councilmember Lee stated that she knew the musicians who submitted comments and asked for more information about the permit fee to play music on the sidewalk. Police Chief Matteucci replied that the police officer who informed the musicians that they needed a permit was wrong. He explained that no permit was needed. DPW Murtuza added that the street musicians need to make sure they aren’t blocking the sidewalk. Councilmember Pappajohn asked about street musicians in the new town square. Parks and Recreation Director Glomstad replied that anyone can come to a city park and play music, but they can’t charge for it. Councilmember Lee asked if they could collect tips. Police Chief Matteucci replied in the affirmative. Councilmember Brownrigg made a motion to adopt Resolution Number 143-2024; seconded by Vice Mayor Stevenson. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote, 5-0. b. INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 8.19 OF TITLE 8 OF THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW EXISTING TOBACCO RETAILER PERMIT HOLDERS AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN DISTANCE AND TRANSFER REQUIREMENTS FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS; CEQA DETERMINATION: EXEMPT PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15378 AND15061(B)(3) ACA Spansail stated that in 2023, San Mateo County created a model tobacco ordinance, and in March 2024, the City adopted an ordinance creating a Tobacco Retailer Permit Program within the city limits. He noted that the City’s program generally mirrored the recently adopted San Mateo County Tobacco Retailer Permit Program, except that it allowed an exemption for on-site hookah consumption. 10 ACA Spansail stated that after six months of the program, the City received feedback from existing retailers including that the distance and transfer requirements of the new program created an issue with their plans to sell or relocate their property. He explained that the Economic Development Subcommittee discussed this topic at a regular meeting on October 16, 2024, and Mayor Colson and Vice Mayor Stevenson expressed concern over how the new program’s quick effective date may have disrupted the short-term plans of existing tobacco retailers in the city. At the conclusion of this item, the Subcommittee directed staff to draft an ordinance that addressed these concerns through implementation of a two-year “grace period” for existing tobacco retailer permit holders to conduct limited transfers of their permit. ACA Spansail reviewed the proposed changes in the new draft ordinance: 1. The amendments would allow existing retailers to transfer their permit to a new owner at the same physical location so long as there has been a complete transfer of ownership in an “Arm’s Length Transaction.” This transaction, and the corresponding transfer of the permit, must have been completed by January 1, 2027, to be effective. This amendment is made to address a portion of the noted concerns, as it allows for the bona-fide sale of a business that could continue operation at the same location. 2. The amendments allow an existing tobacco retailer to transfer their permit to a new physical location. To be effective, the retailer must not propose any additional changes to the permit (such as a change in ownership), and the location may not be located within 250 feet of a youth- populated area. 3. The new retail location must be occupied by the retailer prior to January 1, 2027, to be effective. Assuming these criteria are met, the retailer would not be subject to the remaining distance requirements found in Section 8.19.230. This amendment addresses the concern expressed by retailers that the City’s program halted their short-term relocation plans by allowing existing retailers a brief period for relocation. ACA Spansail stated that while the proposed amendments do not directly address the transfer of a permit to a family member, staff will work with existing tobacco retailers during the initial renewal period to ensure that the “applicant” is listed correctly on the permit. Councilmember Brownrigg asked about the two-year sale limit. Vice Mayor Stevenson explained that the two-year limit was more for the shops where tobacco isn’t the main selling item (gas stations, convenience stores). Mayor Colson stated that the draft ordinance is trying to give leeway to those who had plans to divest from their business but weren’t ready when the ordinance passed. ACA Spansail explained that the restricted radius from a youth-populated area was reduced from 1000 feet to 250 feet, and the 500-foot radius from another tobacco retailer for the two-year period was removed entirely. 11 Mayor Colson thanked ACA Spansail for the clarification. Councilmember Pappajohn asked how the 250-foot radius was determined. ACA Spansail replied that the distance requirement was based on the County ordinance, and it is measured in a straight line from one edge of the property line to the edge of the youth-populated area’s property line. Mayor Colson opened the item for public comment. Mr. Gross voiced concern about the proposed ordinance and how it would be detrimental to his business. Mayor Colson closed public comment. ACA Spansail explained that if a sole-proprietor wanted to sell the business after two years, they could sell it to another sole-proprietor, with the business keeping the same name and location. Councilmember Brownrigg voiced the need to rework the ordinance as he thought the intention of the original ordinance was to push tobacco sellers out over time, and the City wanted to push back against that. ACA Spansail stated that the intent of the County ordinance is to limit the sale of tobacco in youth- populated areas. Mayor Colson suggested keeping the distance requirements but removing the transferring requirements. Councilmember Brownrigg discussed the notion of grandfathering current tobacco businesses. Councilmember Lee agreed with Councilmember Brownrigg and didn’t want to restrict the sale to another entity. Councilmember Pappajohn voiced support for the distance requirements. City Attorney Guina recommended that the Council not move forward with the ordinance, and that staff come back to Council with the changes. Mayor Colson asked if her colleagues wanted to cap the number of tobacco licenses to the number that currently exist. Councilmember Pappajohn was in favor of capping the permits, and not issuing additional permits. ACA Spansail noted the changes wanted by Council. 11. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 12 a. DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS City Manager Goldman explained that prior to February 2018, the Mayor appointed Councilmembers to serve on the Economic Development Subcommittee, and the City Council approved the assignments, along with all other Mayor appointments, at a Council meeting early in the calendar year. In February 2018, then-Mayor Brownrigg requested that the City Council consider changing the process for the Economic Development Subcommittee to remove the Mayor’s discretion and instead make membership automatic; each year, the Vice Mayor and Councilmember third in line to become Mayor would serve on the Subcommittee. She noted that this change was adopted on February 5, 2018. City Manager Goldman explained that on December 18, 2023, the Council adopted Resolution Number 153- 2023 amending this procedure to allow for the appointment of an alternate to the Subcommittee who may serve if a regular Subcommittee member is not available. She stated that the resolution also allows the Mayor to assign a different Councilmember to the Subcommittee on an ongoing basis if either the Vice Mayor or Councilmember third in line to become Mayor declines to serve on the Subcommittee. City Manager Goldman stated that in order for the two-member Economic Development Subcommittee to meet, both members must be present in person. She noted that if a member is not able to attend in person, then the meeting must be canceled and/or rescheduled and that participation via Zoom is not allowed. She noted that under the current procedure, Councilmembers Brownrigg and Pappajohn would serve on the Subcommittee next year. Mayor Colson stated that she had appointed herself last time since she knew she could make all the meetings. Vice Mayor Stevenson asked about having a more flexible schedule for Economic Development Subcommittee meetings. City Manager Goldman replied that it is easier to have meetings on the calendar and cancel them as needed. Councilmember Pappajohn asked if meetings could be changed to noon. City Manager Goldman replied that a lot of attendees are restaurant owners, and they need to be in their businesses at noon. She preferred keeping the current time slot. Councilmember Pappajohn agreed with the current thinking and procedures. She stated that she would be flexible to having someone be appointed as she wouldn’t be able to make the meetings due to her work commitment. Mayor Colson opened the item up for public comment. Desiree Thayer agreed with the idea that the Mayor can appoint someone as the current procedure outlines. 13 Mayor Colson closed public comment. Mayor Colson suggested keeping the rotation as is. The Council concurred. 12. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ACTIVITIES REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS a. MAYOR COLSON’S COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORT 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Brownrigg asked to agendize an update from Sphere on their project on the Bayfront. Council concurred. Mayor Colson asked that campaign sign regulations and the City’s campaign finance ordinance be reviewed. The Council concurred. 14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The agendas, packets, and meeting minutes for the Planning Commission, Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, Beautification Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Library Board of Trustees are available online at www.burlingame.org. 15. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Colson adjourned the meeting at 10:21 p.m. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Meaghan Hassel-Shearer City Clerk