HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 2024-06.24-9A - Review for After-Action Changes DSRDocusign Envelope s. D7CD53BGD8D8-44F5-9578-4B25355CC120
Plann nq oepartment
Cty of Bud ngame
COMI\,IUNITY DEVETOPI,ltENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
2024-041708
2135 pm 08 Cil424 R1 Fee: NO FEE
Count of paqes 5
Recorded in Ofai:ial Re.ords
Cr,rnty of San Mateo
Mark Church
Ass€s€cr-County Crsrk-Ro(jo,ter
r firi iil,llillllflll llllir llillilrtl itrlililrtrililt iilllli
Resolution No. 2024-06.24-94
UPDATING THE GUIDELINES REGARDING THE LEVEL OF
REVIEW REQUIRED FOR AFTER-ACTION CHANGES TO
A P P R ovE D
"^? fi T^,:=-YEW
P R oJ E crs
TITLE OF DOCUMENT
I hereby certify this to be a full, true and mnect copy of the
documenl it purports to be, the original of which is on flle in my
office CiTY
Date: Jul 9,2024
,s
'Lu* y,--^I
enl Direclor :.
n+areu cui.J
Ruben Hunn lnterim Commun
ii ,l'I il
+V
.//
RECORDING REQUESTED BY]
WHEN RECORDED I!4A L TO
?q
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
UPDATING THE GUIDELINES REGARDING THE LEVEL OF REVIEW REQUIRED FOR
AFTER-ACTION GHANGES TO APPROVED OESIGN REVIEW PROJECTS
WHEREAS, in 2003, the Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee of the planning
Commisslon discussed how best to handle changes made to projects during constructlon, including
which changes should be considered "major" and which "minor" in terms of impacting the approved
design of the structure; and
WHEREAS, at the November 12,2003 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission
directed staff to prepare a clarifying policy statement regarding changes to proiects that need to be
reviewed by the Planning Commisston and those that can be approved by staff; and
WHEREAS, at the January 12.2004 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission
adopted a policy on Processing of Minor Project Modifications During Construction (Guidelines).
and
WHEREAS, in 2008. the Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee updated the Guidelines
for how to process changes to proposed projects after project approvalt and
WHEREAS, at the August 24,2015 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission
reviewed and updated the Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, at the May 28,2024 Planning Commission Study Session, the Commission
reviewed the Guidelines and made suggestions regarding a proposed update; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission now desires to update the Guidelines Regarding the
Level of Review Required for After-Action Changes to Approved Design Review projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The foregorng recitals are true and correct and rncorporated into this Resolution
by this reference.
Section 2. The Guidelines Regarding the Level of Review Required forAfter-Action Changes
to Approved Design Review Projects in Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, shall take effect upon adoption.
RESOLUTTON NO. 2024-06.24-8A
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the information contained in this
Resolution and the accompanying staff report, and
1
RESOLUTTON NO. 2024-06.24-8A
h a N S LUJENJTFhT-
I,It, 9llt (
, Secretary of the Planning mmrssron the City of Burlingame, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 24lh dav of June.2024 by the following vote:
Secretary
GUIDEU]€S FOR LEVEL ()f REYEW REOUNEIT
FOR AFTEN{CNOT C}IAiIGES TO APPfiOt/EOoEstci REvtEw pRoJEcTS - RESO m24{t624{AAYES: HORAI{,LOIUEITIIAr-
PFAFE SCH O. SHORE5, rSEraOES: l{Ol{E
ABSEIIT COIAROTO
RECUSEIT: }{OtE
2
EXHIBIT A
Updated: June 24,2024
This is a list of items created by the Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee and updated by the
Planning Commission regarding the level of review required for after-action changes to a design
review project made after project approval.
Items that may be handled administratively by Staff:
Minor changes to the side and rear elevation (except street side on a corner lot) that are
consistent with the design of the project
Changes to upgrade the quality of materials
Change to front door design if it is consistent with the overall design of the project
Change in window material to flberglass and fiberglass clad wood
Adding a window if it is not a privacy issue
Adding or removing one window on a side or rear elevalion
Changes in size of windows less than 15%
Changes to pitch of roof so long as the increased in height is one fool or less and does not
exceed the permitted height of the structure, except in Hillside Overlay Area
Change in roofing material that is consistent with the overall design of the project
Adding skylights if tinted and flat
Change in landscaping including "like-for-like' replacement of landscape trees and pnvacy
hedges: change in landscaping layout if the configuration is similar to that of the originally
approved design intent
Items requiring Planning Commission review (Design Review Amendment):
Significant changes in materials and details on the front elevation, or front and side on a
corner lot
Changes in materials which are lesser quality than originally approved
Change in roofing material that is not consistent with the overall design of the project
Change to the complexity of window grid pattern, reduction in number of window grids, or
elimination of window grids
Change in window material to vtnyl or vinyl clad wood
Changes to window shapes (e.9., roundtop to rectangular shaped window)
Changes to window trim package (e.9., wood trim to stucco foam trim, elimination of window
trim, etc.)
lncrease to the size of stairuvay window(s)
Change in exterior siding from wood to fiber cement or other lesser quality material
Change from mitered corner design to corner trim
Changes to exterior trim which are of lesser quality
Any changes which affect concerns expressly stated in the points made by the Planning
Commission or neighbors during the original application review
RESOLUTTON NO. 2024-06.24-8A
GUIDELINES REGAROING THE LEVEL OF REVIEW REQUIRED FOR AFTER.ACTION
CHANGES TO APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECTS
Any other types of changes will be reviewed by staff in consultation with the Planning Manager or
Community Development Director to determine if Planning Commission review is required.
However, if staff feels that during construction a proposed change to any project is not within the
spirit and concerns expressed by the Commission and the neighbors at the time of Commission's
original or any subsequent action, it will be brought forward to the Commission as an amendment
to the original approval.
4
RESOLUTTON NO. 2024-06.24-8A