Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - PC - 2024-06.24-9A - Review for After-Action Changes DSRDocusign Envelope s. D7CD53BGD8D8-44F5-9578-4B25355CC120 Plann nq oepartment Cty of Bud ngame COMI\,IUNITY DEVETOPI,ltENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CA 94010 2024-041708 2135 pm 08 Cil424 R1 Fee: NO FEE Count of paqes 5 Recorded in Ofai:ial Re.ords Cr,rnty of San Mateo Mark Church Ass€s€cr-County Crsrk-Ro(jo,ter r firi iil,llillllflll llllir llillilrtl itrlililrtrililt iilllli Resolution No. 2024-06.24-94 UPDATING THE GUIDELINES REGARDING THE LEVEL OF REVIEW REQUIRED FOR AFTER-ACTION CHANGES TO A P P R ovE D "^? fi T^,:=-YEW P R oJ E crs TITLE OF DOCUMENT I hereby certify this to be a full, true and mnect copy of the documenl it purports to be, the original of which is on flle in my office CiTY Date: Jul 9,2024 ,s 'Lu* y,--^I enl Direclor :. n+areu cui.J Ruben Hunn lnterim Commun ii ,l'I il +V .// RECORDING REQUESTED BY] WHEN RECORDED I!4A L TO ?q RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME UPDATING THE GUIDELINES REGARDING THE LEVEL OF REVIEW REQUIRED FOR AFTER-ACTION GHANGES TO APPROVED OESIGN REVIEW PROJECTS WHEREAS, in 2003, the Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee of the planning Commisslon discussed how best to handle changes made to projects during constructlon, including which changes should be considered "major" and which "minor" in terms of impacting the approved design of the structure; and WHEREAS, at the November 12,2003 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission directed staff to prepare a clarifying policy statement regarding changes to proiects that need to be reviewed by the Planning Commisston and those that can be approved by staff; and WHEREAS, at the January 12.2004 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission adopted a policy on Processing of Minor Project Modifications During Construction (Guidelines). and WHEREAS, in 2008. the Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee updated the Guidelines for how to process changes to proposed projects after project approvalt and WHEREAS, at the August 24,2015 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed and updated the Guidelines; and WHEREAS, at the May 28,2024 Planning Commission Study Session, the Commission reviewed the Guidelines and made suggestions regarding a proposed update; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission now desires to update the Guidelines Regarding the Level of Review Required for After-Action Changes to Approved Design Review projects. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The foregorng recitals are true and correct and rncorporated into this Resolution by this reference. Section 2. The Guidelines Regarding the Level of Review Required forAfter-Action Changes to Approved Design Review Projects in Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, shall take effect upon adoption. RESOLUTTON NO. 2024-06.24-8A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the information contained in this Resolution and the accompanying staff report, and 1 RESOLUTTON NO. 2024-06.24-8A h a N S LUJENJTFhT- I,It, 9llt ( , Secretary of the Planning mmrssron the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24lh dav of June.2024 by the following vote: Secretary GUIDEU]€S FOR LEVEL ()f REYEW REOUNEIT FOR AFTEN{CNOT C}IAiIGES TO APPfiOt/EOoEstci REvtEw pRoJEcTS - RESO m24{t624{AAYES: HORAI{,LOIUEITIIAr- PFAFE SCH O. SHORE5, rSEraOES: l{Ol{E ABSEIIT COIAROTO RECUSEIT: }{OtE 2 EXHIBIT A Updated: June 24,2024 This is a list of items created by the Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee and updated by the Planning Commission regarding the level of review required for after-action changes to a design review project made after project approval. Items that may be handled administratively by Staff: Minor changes to the side and rear elevation (except street side on a corner lot) that are consistent with the design of the project Changes to upgrade the quality of materials Change to front door design if it is consistent with the overall design of the project Change in window material to flberglass and fiberglass clad wood Adding a window if it is not a privacy issue Adding or removing one window on a side or rear elevalion Changes in size of windows less than 15% Changes to pitch of roof so long as the increased in height is one fool or less and does not exceed the permitted height of the structure, except in Hillside Overlay Area Change in roofing material that is consistent with the overall design of the project Adding skylights if tinted and flat Change in landscaping including "like-for-like' replacement of landscape trees and pnvacy hedges: change in landscaping layout if the configuration is similar to that of the originally approved design intent Items requiring Planning Commission review (Design Review Amendment): Significant changes in materials and details on the front elevation, or front and side on a corner lot Changes in materials which are lesser quality than originally approved Change in roofing material that is not consistent with the overall design of the project Change to the complexity of window grid pattern, reduction in number of window grids, or elimination of window grids Change in window material to vtnyl or vinyl clad wood Changes to window shapes (e.9., roundtop to rectangular shaped window) Changes to window trim package (e.9., wood trim to stucco foam trim, elimination of window trim, etc.) lncrease to the size of stairuvay window(s) Change in exterior siding from wood to fiber cement or other lesser quality material Change from mitered corner design to corner trim Changes to exterior trim which are of lesser quality Any changes which affect concerns expressly stated in the points made by the Planning Commission or neighbors during the original application review RESOLUTTON NO. 2024-06.24-8A GUIDELINES REGAROING THE LEVEL OF REVIEW REQUIRED FOR AFTER.ACTION CHANGES TO APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PROJECTS Any other types of changes will be reviewed by staff in consultation with the Planning Manager or Community Development Director to determine if Planning Commission review is required. However, if staff feels that during construction a proposed change to any project is not within the spirit and concerns expressed by the Commission and the neighbors at the time of Commission's original or any subsequent action, it will be brought forward to the Commission as an amendment to the original approval. 4 RESOLUTTON NO. 2024-06.24-8A