HomeMy WebLinkAbout11.26.07 PC minutes APPROVED
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVED MINUTES
City Council Chambers
501 Primrose Road - Burlingame, California
November 26, 2007 - 7:00 p.m.
1
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Deal called the November 26, 2007, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:02
p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg (arrived at 7:06 p.m.), Cauchi, Deal, Osterling, Terrones and
Vistica
Absent: Commissioner Terrones
Staff Present: Community Development Director, William Meeker; Planner, Erica Strohmeier; and City
Attorney, Larry Anderson
III. MINUTES
Commissioner Cauchi moved, seconded by Commissioner Auran to approve the minutes of the November
13, 2007 regular meeting of the Planning Commission with the following changes:
Page 12, Item 8, last paragraph; append “The area shouldn’t be used for storage” by adding “in
particular autos” to the end of the sentence.
Page 13, insert the following statement prior to “Commissioner Osterling left the meeting at 9:04
p.m.”: “Commissioner Osterling noted that he had been in contact with the landscape architect for
the project at 1226 El Camino Real, and would continue to work with him”.
Motion passed 5-0-2 (Commissioners Terrones and Brownrigg absent).
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
There were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR
Chair Deal noted that this evening’s meeting would be his last as a Planning Commissioner since he has
been elected to the City Council. He has enjoyed his thirteen (13) years on the Commission and will miss
the other members of the Commission.
Commissioner Brownrigg arrived at the meeting at 7:06 p.m.
VI. STUDY ITEMS
1. 1100 OXFORD ROAD, ZONED R-1 – APPLICATION FOR FENCE EXCEPTION FOR A NEW 8'-0" HIGH
FENCE WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK (MICHAEL ZAWADSKY, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY
OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER (request to continue to December 10, 2007
Planning Commission meeting)
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
2
This item was continued to the December 10, 2007 Planning Commission meeting at the applicant’s
request.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Items on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted upon
simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the
public or a Commissioner prior to the time the Commission votes on the motion to adopt.
Chair Deal asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent
calendar. There were no requests.
2a. 345 LORTON AVENUE, ZONED C-2, SUBAREA B-1 – APPLICATION FOR ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF
AN APPROVED APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR HEIGHT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR AN ADDITION TO THE FOURTH FLOOR
OF AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING (ANGELINE ASKHAM, WALKER WARNER ARCHITECTS,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; OUTFITTER PROPERTIES LLC, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT
PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS
2b. 1800 DAVIS DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND
STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT, AND DEREX LOUIE, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA
WHITMAN
2c. 1775 ESCALANTE WAY, ZONED R-1 – APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING (ROBERT MEDAN, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; WADE AND ELIZABETH LAI,
PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Commissioner Osterling moved approval of the Consent Calendar based on the facts in the staff reports,
Commissioner’s comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff
reports and by resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Auran. Chair Deal called for a
voice vote on the motion and it passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner Terrones absent). Appeal procedures were
advised.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS
3. 2538 HAYWARD DRIVE, ZONED R-1 – APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY
ADDITION (AUDREY TSE, INSITE DESIGN, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND STEVE AND SHANNON
CANNON, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Reference staff report dated November 26, 2007, with attachments. Planner Strohmeier presented the
report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eleven (11) conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chair Deal opened the public hearing.
Steve Cannon and Shannon Casey-Cannon, 2538 Hayward Drive and Audrey Tse, 1534 Plaza Lane, Suite
318, Burlingame; represented the applicant.
Commission comments:
The plan is nicely done.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
3
Vinyl windows are not acceptable, should be true divided light, or simulated true divided light
windows either of wood or vinyl-clad wood design; detachable mullions are not acceptable.
Public comments:
[Andy Mobardy, 1781 Escalante Way; noted that he wished to speak regarding the proposed project at
1775 Escalante Way, and concerns regarding impacts upon his mother’s property next door. He was
advised by City Attorney Anderson that action had already been taken regarding that item (Item 2c) as part
of the Consent Calendar, and that he should have requested that the item be pulled for discussion. He was
advised to speak to a member of the Planning Division to discuss appeal procedures.]
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Brownrigg moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended
conditions; specifying that the windows shall be vinyl-clad simulated true divided light windows and that the
Variance is warranted due to trapezoidal shape of lot and the design will not impact neighbors:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped November 2, 2007, Sheets A.0 through A.9, LS.0, and DM.1, and that any changes to
building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an
amendment to this permit;
2. that the windows installed in the residence shall be vinyl-clad, simulated true divided light windows;
3. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's July 27, 2007 memo, and the City Engineer's, Fire
Marshal's, and the NPDES Coordinator's July 30, 2007 memos shall be met;
4. that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the right side setback
variance, as well as any other exceptions to the code granted here, will become void;
5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site
shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to
comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural
features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review;
7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is
issued;
8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance
which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,
2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS
PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
4
10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that
the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as
window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification
documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division
before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled;
11. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the
roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; and
12. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Cauchi.
Additional Commission comments:
Commissioners Cauchi and Auran noted that they had spoken to the neighbors who indicated that they did
not have problems with the design of the project.
Chair Deal called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner
Terrones absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:26 p.m.
4. 2724 MARTINEZ DRIVE, ZONED R-1 – APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ATTACHED
GARAGE FOR SUBSTANTIAL CONSTRUCTION AND FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING - (JESSE GEURSE, GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, APPLICANT AND
DESIGNER; AND WAYNE PAN, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Reference staff report dated November 26, 2007, with attachments. Community Development Director
Meeker presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fourteen (14) conditions were
suggested for consideration.
Chair Deal opened the public hearing.
Jesse Geurse, 405 Bayswater Avenue, Burlingame; represented the applicant.
Commission comments:
Discussed the appropriate species of tree or shrub in the rear yard; use a tree that will not grow
beyond 15-feet in height or maintain it at that maximum height.
Chair Deal acknowledged that he had visited the property.
Requested that the applicant have a landscape contractor clean up the front yard.
Public comments:
Bruce and JoAnn Thompson, 1600 Granada Drive, Burlingame; and Una Kinsella, 501A Vermont Street,
San Francisco; thanked the architect and applicants for working with them to bring back a an acceptable
plan that addresses their concerns. They noted that they would like additional conditions imposed relative
to landscaping and provided a written document entitled “Conditions of Approval”, dated November 26,
2007 for consideration by the Commission.
Additional Commission comments:
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
5
Asked for clarification of view impacts from tree in front-yard (impacts view from bedroom)
Suggested having trees in front yard maintained at a height no greater than the peak of the roof;
otherwise the property will not be properly landscaped.
Asked if the Thompson’s suggested conditions had been reviewed by the project architect and
applicant (not yet – architect indicated that though he wasn’t certain his client would agree to the
conditions, he didn’t see them as a huge matter, and would work with the landscape architect).
With respect to the Thompson’s suggested conditions; clarify the meaning of “view corridor” to
mean “airport” view corridor.
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Vistica moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended
conditions, including conditions as suggested by Bruce and JoAnn Thompson in their November 26, 2007
“conditions of approval” submittal, as modified by the Commission:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped November 16, 2007 sheets T.0, L1.0, DM.1, DM.2, and A.0 through A.8, and that any
changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an
amendment to this permit;
2. that trees shown on the landscape plan for the rear-yard shall not be permitted to exceed a height
of 15-feet from the base of the lower patio, and shall be maintained at a height of no greater than
15-feet;
3. that the neighbors at 1600 Granada Drive (Thompsons) and the applicants (Pans) shall review and
agree upon the placement of the trees in the rear-yard landscape plan in order to mitigate any
future view issues;
4. that no shrubs, or future shrubs, shall be permitted to grow to a height greater than the maximum
allowable fence height permitted by the City of Burlingame, and shall be maintained at a height of
no greater than that measurement;
5. that no additional trees shall be planted in the existing airport view corridor where trees do not
currently exist;
6. that trees planted within the front-yard shall not be permitted to grow to the height exceeding the
height of the peak of the roof, and shall be maintained at a height of no greater than that
measurement;
7. that the chimney height of the kitchen vents as shown on the plans shall not exceed the
manufacturer’s minimum; and that if a chimney for a fireplace, the height shall not exceed 2-feet
above all surrounding surfaces within 10-feet of the chimney (the minimum specification of the
Building Code).
8. that trees noted for removal on the landscape plan shall be removed in advance of issuance of a
building permit for the project;
9. that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's December 15, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's
December 15, 2006 memo, the Fire Marshal's December 13, 2006 memo, and the NPDES
Coordinator's December 13, 2006 memo shall be met;
10. that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site
shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
6
comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
11. that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which
would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural
features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review;
12. that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new
structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer;
13. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or
another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that
the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as
window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification
documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division
before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled.
14. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the
roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;
15. that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the
architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans;
16. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these
venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is
issued;
17. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,
2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame;
18. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance
which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit;
19. that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new
residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in
Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water
runoff;
20. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water
Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and
21. that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete
Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of
permit application.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Cauchi.
Chair Deal called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Commissioner
Terrones absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:50 p.m.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
7
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
Commissioner Cauchi recused himself since he lives within 500-feet of the property at 612 Concord Way.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
8
5. 612 CONCORD WAY, ZONED R-1 – APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND
STORY ADDITION (BAHMAN AVAL, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; JOHN AND PATRICIA EATON,
PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Planner Strohmeier briefly presented the project description. Noted that garage needs to be brought up to
code or a Parking Variance will be required. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Deal opened the public comment period.
Bahman Aval, 159 16th Avenue, San Mateo; represented the applicant.
Commission comments:
Roof ridgelines should line up.
Correct plan errors (mismatched roof ridges, mislabeled elevations, etc.)
Align floor plans as you move from left to right on plan sheet.
No problem with proposed addition.
A mixture of window types exists; though the applicant wishes to use vinyl windows, vinyl windows
are generally not accepted.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Additional Commission comments:
Windows should be a minimum of vinyl-clad wood windows, if not wood windows.
Commissioner Vistica made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete, with
direction that the windows shall be minimum of vinyl clad windows.
Further Commission comments:
The Variance should be eliminated for the length of the garage; the garage should meet code.
Review plans and correct errors and inconsistencies.
The applicant should listen to audio recording of the meeting to hear all Commission comments.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Auran.
Chair Deal called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-1-1 (Commissioner Terrones absent,
Commission Cauchi recused). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This
item concluded at 8:10 p.m.
Commissioner Cauchi returned to the dais.
6. 1705 EASTON DRIVE, ZONED R-1 – APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION (DEBRA COX, BLUELINES DESIGN, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER;
LANDRY SUEN TRUST, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Community Development Director Meeker briefly presented the project description. There were no
questions of staff.
Chair Deal opened the public comment period.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
9
Debra Cox, 2033 Ralston avenue, Belmont; represented the applicant.
Commission comments:
Complemented the design.
Noted that applicant needs to be certain that all design elements shown on the plans will be placed
on the structure; otherwise, there will be a need to bring the matter back to the Commission as an
FYI.
Consider using a single shed-type dormer on the front, rather than two separate dormers.
Asked if windows are being replaced (those on the front will all be new, most other windows will be
replaced).
Questioned why the carport wasn’t being changed (changes would require a Variance since the
structure is non-conforming).
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Additional Commission comments:
Commissioner Cauchi noted that he likes the design and agrees with the suggestions made
regarding the dormer, but can live with either design.
Commissioner Cauchi made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Osterling.
Further Commission comments:
Consider simplifying the dormer on the front; perhaps use a single shed dormer.
Look at landscaping options to soften the appearance of the carport (e.g. vines).
Chair Deal called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the Consent Calendar when plans have
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (Commissioner Terrones absent). The
Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:22 p.m.
7. 2508 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 – APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, VARIANCES AND
SPECIAL PERMITS FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (MGS CONSTRUCTION,
APPLICANT; DAVID HIRZEL, DESIGNER; LENA AND DOMINIC CHANG, PROPERTY OWNERS)
PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Planner Strohmeier briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Deal opened the public comment period.
Commission comments:
Asked if both existing and proposed floor-plans and elevations are required as part of the submittal
(yes).
David Hirzel, P. O. Box 1808, Pacifica; represented the applicant.
Additional Commission comments:
Asked if there was a property line survey (yes).
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
10
Suggested reducing length of garage to maintain light into property.
Noted that there were other options for placement of the garage that would not require a Variance.
Questioned some of the detailing.
Vinyl windows will not be accepted; should be a minimum of vinyl-clad wood windows; snap on
grids will not be accepted.
Provide an example of proposed windows.
Massing of the addition is correct, but troubled by long blank wall of garage.
Public comments:
Barbara Cipher, 2512 Hillside Drive, Burlingame; expressed concern about the proximity of the construction
to her property, specifically the garage. She doesn’t want two monstrosities next to her property. She
expressed concern about blocking light to her property; into back-yard or into her house.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Osterling made a motion to send the item to design reviewer.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Brownrigg.
Further Commission comments:
Commissioner Auran noted that he does not support the Variance request.
Chair Deal called for a vote on the motion to refer the project to a design reviewer. The motion passed on a
voice vote 6-0-1 (Commissioner Terrones absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not
appealable. This item concluded at 8:43 p.m.
Commissioner Osterling recused himself, as he lives within 500-feet of the property located at 1320 Castillo
Drive.
8. 1320 CASTILLO DRIVE, ZONED R-1 – APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO
STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN & ENGR.,
INC., APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; TONY LEUNG, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER:
RUBEN HURIN
Community Development Director Meeker briefly presented the project description. There were no
questions of staff.
Chair Deal opened the public comment period.
Commission comments:
Chair Deal acknowledged that he had received less than a $250 donation to his City Council
campaign from the applicant’s architect.
James Chu, 55 W. 43rd Avenue, San Mateo; represented the applicant. Noted that a tree removal permit
had been granted for removal of the tree within the front-yard.
Additional Commission comments:
Overall liked the design.
Symmetry seems to be a bit off on the front elevation.
Side-yard patio needs some type of treatment to soften appearance.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
11
Will the second-floor balcony in the rear affect neighbor’s privacy?
Consider methods of reducing the amount of hardscape in the plan; look at ways to reduce storm-
water run-off.
Path from parking space to house could be smaller; would provide more area for landscaping;
perhaps consider a tree separating the concrete for the driveway from the patio to soften the
appearance.
Consider making the porch a bit more prominent; something more than just a door on the porch,
perhaps a window.
Consider paving strips for driveway.
Public comments:
Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, Burlingame; noted that the Commission should express its opinion
regarding the massing of the rear of the structure, since the property owner will likely be selling the home
once it is completed.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Auran made a motion to place the item on the Consent Calendar when complete.
Further Commission comments:
Work on making front porch more prominent.
Reduce amount of impervious surfaces.
Consider second floor balcony change to reduce privacy impacts for neighbor.
Consult with neighbor regarding desire to install fountain on side of property.
Soften access from the kitchen to the driveway area.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Vistica.
Chair Deal called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular Action Calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote5-0-1-1 (Commissioner Terrones absent,
Commissioner Osterling recused). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This
item concluded at 9:03 p.m.
Commissioner Osterling returned to the dais.
X. COMMISSIONERS’ REPORTS
None.
XI. DIRECTOR’S REPORT
Commission Communications:
⋅ It was noted that an appeal was filed relative to the project at 3105 Margarita Drive; the date
for the public hearing on the appeal is pending.
⋅ The Commission was asked to confirm that Saturday, March 22, 2008 will work for the
annual Joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting.
⋅ It was noted that staff is targeting January 1, 2008 as the date for beginning posting of sites
for new Design Review projects.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Approved Minutes November 26, 2007
12
⋅ A reception for outgoing Planning Commissioner Jerry Deal is scheduled to precede the
next Planning Commission meeting on Monday, December 10, 2007 at 6:30 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers.
City Council regular meeting of November 19, 2007:
⋅ There were no actions to report.
FYI: 821 Paloma Avenue – Requested as-built changes to a previously approved Design Review
project.
⋅ Accepted the changes.
Other Comments:
⋅ City Attorney Anderson requested clarification from the Neighborhood Consistency
Subcommittee regarding second floor balconies (depends on the proximity to adjacent
properties).
⋅ Commissioner Osterling noted that the audio recording of the last meeting he received
would not play.
⋅ Chair Deal noted the proliferation of “Burlingame Singles” signs.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Deal adjourned the meeting at 9:13 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
David Cauchi, Vice-Chair