HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 035-1985RESOLUTION NO. 35- 85
AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN
RECORDS, DOCUMENTS AND PAPERS
WHEREAS, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of
California provides that with the approval of the legislative body by
resolution, and with the consent of the City Attorney, the head of a city
department may, with certain exceptions, destroy any city record, document,
instrument, book or paper not less than two (2) years old, without making a
copy thereof, and after the same is no longer required; and
WHEREAS, the CITY ATTORNEY has recommended
the destruction of certain records, more particularly described below;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Burlingame,
California, does hereby RESOLVE AND DETERMINE as follows:
1. Pursuant to Section 34090 of the California Government Code,`
the City Attorney of this City be, and
he is hereby, authorized to destroy the following records, documents
i` and papers in the possession of his office and which are more than 3
�C two (2) years old:
i"
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
2. None of said records, documents and papers constitute records
affecting the title to real property or liens thereon, court records,
records required to be kept by statute, or minutes, ordinances or resolutions of the City Council, or of any City board or commission.
i;
I "layor
u
Judith A. Malfatti, i
XFXftb(ARXKXXRXQ(Q(, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, California,
does hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a reular
meeting of the City Council held on the 15th day of April 19 5
and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: AMSTRUP, BARTON, MANGINI, MARTIN, PAGLIARO
NOES: COUNCILMEN: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: NONE 3
C OLL-
City Clerk
1i
�1
I consent to the destruction of the records, documents and papers
more particularly described in the foregoin esolu ion.
i
�, City Attorney
EXHIBIT A
CITY ATTORNEY FILES TO BE DESTROYED
(*) Indicates file is retained and only selected papers are destroyed)
Burlingame Civic Improvement Association v. Burlingame
Bearint Industrial Park
Ellis v. Burlingame *
City Attorney Memorandum 1970-71
Public Works Contracts 1956 to 1974
Safeway v. Burlingame
Grav v. Burlinaame *
ame v. Hodges *
ame v. Bragato Paving
ame v. Burlinaame Shore Land
Easton v. Burlingame
Tailer v. Burlingame
Peninsula Jewish Community Center v.
Burlingame v. Coombs
Burlingame v. Downey
Burlinaame v. Weinand
urlingamey. Rothstein
urlingame v. Sperry
urlingame v. LaBaron Hotel
alifornia v. Burlinqame
Recreation Center Claims
California v. Sperry Rand
Ford v. Burlingame
Guittard Chocolate Easements
Gilbert v. Burlingame
California v. Ocean Shore Land Comp
Gilpin v. Burlingame
Meljohn v. Browning
Mohawk v. County of San Mateo
Pacific Telephone v. Burlingame
Wise v. Burlingame
Western Pipe Anti -Trust
American Pipe Anti -Trust
Himmel v. Burlingame (1965)
Burlingame Civic Improvement Club
Burlingame v. Nielson *
Burlingame v. Powell Corporation
San Francisco v. Burlingame *
California v. San Francisco, Burlin
Hill v. Burlingame
Jones v. Burlingame
Burlinqame v. White
San Carlos v. S.F.
BYE v. Burlingame
*
Off -Street Parking District *
Rollins Road Assessment District
Easement Vacation *
Library Parking Lot
Old City Hall Parking Lot
Bayshore Highway Vacation
Callwell Purchase *
California Drive Street Lighting
Annexations - Skyline Boulevard
Sale of Parcel to Safeway Stores
Purchase of Parking Lot - Donnelly & Lorton
Broadway Parking and Lighting District
Burlingame Plaza Street Lighting
Broadway Industrial District
Sale of Brewer Reservoir *
City Hall Construction
Barnett (Heritage ) Park *
Bayside Park Phase II
Burlingame v. Covey Trucking
Burlingame v. Fog Cutter
Lucky Lady
Marie Jones - 1824 Barroilhet