Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 035-1985RESOLUTION NO. 35- 85 AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS, DOCUMENTS AND PAPERS WHEREAS, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California provides that with the approval of the legislative body by resolution, and with the consent of the City Attorney, the head of a city department may, with certain exceptions, destroy any city record, document, instrument, book or paper not less than two (2) years old, without making a copy thereof, and after the same is no longer required; and WHEREAS, the CITY ATTORNEY has recommended the destruction of certain records, more particularly described below; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Burlingame, California, does hereby RESOLVE AND DETERMINE as follows: 1. Pursuant to Section 34090 of the California Government Code,` the City Attorney of this City be, and he is hereby, authorized to destroy the following records, documents i` and papers in the possession of his office and which are more than 3 �C two (2) years old: i" SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" 2. None of said records, documents and papers constitute records affecting the title to real property or liens thereon, court records, records required to be kept by statute, or minutes, ordinances or resolutions of the City Council, or of any City board or commission. i; I "layor u Judith A. Malfatti, i XFXftb(ARXKXXRXQ(Q(, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, California, does hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a reular meeting of the City Council held on the 15th day of April 19 5 and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: AMSTRUP, BARTON, MANGINI, MARTIN, PAGLIARO NOES: COUNCILMEN: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: NONE 3 C OLL- City Clerk 1i �1 I consent to the destruction of the records, documents and papers more particularly described in the foregoin esolu ion. i �, City Attorney EXHIBIT A CITY ATTORNEY FILES TO BE DESTROYED (*) Indicates file is retained and only selected papers are destroyed) Burlingame Civic Improvement Association v. Burlingame Bearint Industrial Park Ellis v. Burlingame * City Attorney Memorandum 1970-71 Public Works Contracts 1956 to 1974 Safeway v. Burlingame Grav v. Burlinaame * ame v. Hodges * ame v. Bragato Paving ame v. Burlinaame Shore Land Easton v. Burlingame Tailer v. Burlingame Peninsula Jewish Community Center v. Burlingame v. Coombs Burlingame v. Downey Burlinaame v. Weinand urlingamey. Rothstein urlingame v. Sperry urlingame v. LaBaron Hotel alifornia v. Burlinqame Recreation Center Claims California v. Sperry Rand Ford v. Burlingame Guittard Chocolate Easements Gilbert v. Burlingame California v. Ocean Shore Land Comp Gilpin v. Burlingame Meljohn v. Browning Mohawk v. County of San Mateo Pacific Telephone v. Burlingame Wise v. Burlingame Western Pipe Anti -Trust American Pipe Anti -Trust Himmel v. Burlingame (1965) Burlingame Civic Improvement Club Burlingame v. Nielson * Burlingame v. Powell Corporation San Francisco v. Burlingame * California v. San Francisco, Burlin Hill v. Burlingame Jones v. Burlingame Burlinqame v. White San Carlos v. S.F. BYE v. Burlingame * Off -Street Parking District * Rollins Road Assessment District Easement Vacation * Library Parking Lot Old City Hall Parking Lot Bayshore Highway Vacation Callwell Purchase * California Drive Street Lighting Annexations - Skyline Boulevard Sale of Parcel to Safeway Stores Purchase of Parking Lot - Donnelly & Lorton Broadway Parking and Lighting District Burlingame Plaza Street Lighting Broadway Industrial District Sale of Brewer Reservoir * City Hall Construction Barnett (Heritage ) Park * Bayside Park Phase II Burlingame v. Covey Trucking Burlingame v. Fog Cutter Lucky Lady Marie Jones - 1824 Barroilhet