HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 052-1997RESOLUTION NO. 52-97
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
RECOMMENDING THAT THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT IMPOSE CHARGES FOR FUNDING COUNTYWIDE NATIONAL
POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PROGRAM
WHEREAS, The Environmental Protection Agency, under amendments to the 1987 Federal
Clean Water Act, imposed regulations that mandate local governments to control and reduce the
amount of stormwater pollutant runoff into receiving waters.
WHEREAS, under the authority of California Porter -Cologne Water Quality Act, the State Water
Resources Control Board has delegated authority to its regional boards to invoke permitting
requirements upon counties and cities.
WHEREAS, in July 1991, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board notified
San Mateo County of the requirement to submit an NPDES Permit Application by November 30,
1992.
WHEREAS, in furtherance of the NPDES Permit Process, San Mateo County in conjunction with
all incorporated cities in San Mateo County has prepared a Stormwater Manager Plan which has
a General Program as a fundamental component of the Management Plan.
WHEREAS, the Stormwater Management Plan has been submitted to the San Francisco Bay
Regional Water Quality Board and that Management Plan has been approved by the Board and
made part of NPDES Waste Discharge Permit CA 0029921, issued September 13, 1993 and
remaining in effect through June 30, 1998.
WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Flood Control District Act, as amended by the State
Legislature in 1992 (Assembly Bill 2635), authorizes the San Mateo County Flood Control
District to impose charges to fund storm drainage programs such as the NPDES Program;
Countywide General Program charges for Fiscal Year 1997/98 as anticipated to be $958,900 or;
Single Family Resident: $3.44/APN; Miscellaneous, Agricultural, Vacant and Condominium:
$1.72/APN; all other land uses a base rate of $3.44/APN plus $0.3127 per 1,000 additional
square feet of parcel area.
WHEREAS, the City has held a hearing upon the proposal to fund the Countywide NPDES
General Program through the San Mateo County Flood Control District; and City Council makes
the below resolve following that hearing.
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame that:
The City of Burlingame respectfully requests the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors,
acting as the governing board of the San Mateo County Flood Control District, to impose
those charges necessary to fund the Countywide NPDES General Program; and
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the San Mateo
County Board of Supervisors.
A- p'/}
Mayor
I, Judith Malfatti, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7th day
of J111 Y , 1997 and as adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: HARRISON, JANNEY, KNIGHT, O'MHONY, SPINELLI
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
i
CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVER
1997.98 PROGRAM BUDGET
JULY 1, 1997 - JUNE 30, 1998
lby fund)
NPDES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PROGRAM FUND
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The program is a response to the mandate imposed by federal and state legislation and the San
Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board directing San Mateo County to obtain a stormwater discharge
permit. CCAG has been designated by its members as the administrator of the program for all of the jurisdictions that
have joined together as co -permittee agencies. This year's program will continue to carry out the mandate of the
Stormwater Management Plan and its main objective of implementing a comprehensive storm water quality
management program to protect the water quality of San Francisco Bay, the Pacific Ocean and San Mateo County
tributary streams from the adverse effects of stormwater caused pollution.
ESTIMATED BEGINNING BALANCE S 206,577
RESERVE BALANCE $100,903
PROJECTED REVENUES
Interest Earnings $ 12,000
NPDES Fee' $839,300
TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUES $ 851,300
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS $1,057,877
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
Administration Services
$
125,499
Professional Services
$
112,204
Consulting Services'
$
604,300
Supplies
$
1,500
Prof. Dues & Membership'
$
111,400
Conferences & Meetings
$
3,500
Publications
$
500
NPDES Distributions
$0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
S
958,900
NET CHANGE
$1107,6001
TRANSFER TO RESERVES
$0
TOTAL USE OF FUNDS
$958,900
ENDING FUND BALANCE
$ 98,977
RESERVE FUND BALANCE $100,903
'NPDES Fee - Assumed the same contribution rate as 1996-97.
2Consulting services ere provided by EOA.
3Cansists of Permits and Regional Assessment lees.
1 2
m
IN
IIIIIIIIII
IN
I
m
0
D
o
r
n
n
a
8
m
O
m
ryM�
fDf9
VM,NJI
N
N
In
O
O
m
S
�
�
�
IfVVn9
W
�
W
NN
�
�
�
N
�
�(`Q9pVJll�
Y�
f9
a
W
W
m
O
8
In
S
O
A
O
ai
W
N
O
y
O
W
Opi
w
pp
{N�
N
�
m
UOu
0
0
0
0
ON
OL
$
8
'
1pypyph
pl
C
(C
O
Cl
{Q CI
NQa
O
m
m
w
1n
-7
O
cs�ry
Np
O
IC
f99
l9
ff99
w
O
a`
It
z
a
c
�
�
c
C
fNly
E
y
W
r
cc
N
y�
LL
W
d
coCD
C
_Fvd
v
��
'p
v'
`s
'
dm"�
„
LL
O7
01
G>
'c
m
N_
m
N
m$
0
m
$
a.
g
q
E
o
o
O
g
yoj
W
a
2•
a
O
K
'ai
m
y¢
U
y
t
c
d
'o
W
anv@
E
E
N
n
e
c
$
E$
L"
E
m
IS
a
a-
o
E
w
a`_i
'n
d
+
o
1'3
m
'o
}
ao
.Y
u°'f'
ag`�'
agL'�
gEv
•!L�2
Uc
E
oU
0
o
U
0o
a
¢
d
m
m
o
OUa
w
Uc
za
W
w
Y!
K
$E
Fa
Xm
m
N
w
W
COO
U
G
m
O
W
L
L
:E[
v
FQ
z
U
S
Q
Sheetl
BUDGET PROJECTION THROUGH FY 1999/2000 4/8/97
NPDES
Estimated Revenue for Fiscal Year 1997/98, including interest, _ $851,300
Budget year Actual Budget Adjustments Net Budget
FY 1994/95 $1,104,363 $0 $1,104,363
FY 1995/96 $907,903 $0 $907,903
FY 1996/97 $906,000 ($60,000) Note #1 $846,000
FY 1997/98 $958,900 ($128,000) Note #2 $830,900
FY 1998/99 $855,800 $0 $855,800
FY 1999/00 $881,500 $0 $881,500
Note #1 Actual Budget includes a one-time cost of $34,000 for Permit Renewal
preparation and a $26,000 carry-over of unexpended funds from previous
year.
Note #2 Actual Budget includes a one-time cost of $128,000 for
Permit Renewal Application
WITH PROJECTED CARRY-OVER OF UNEXPENDED FUNDS FROM PREVIOUS
FISCAL YEARS, CURRENT FEES SHOULD FUND THE PROGRAM THROUGH
_
FISCAL YEAR 1999/00.
Page 1