Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 052-1997RESOLUTION NO. 52-97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME RECOMMENDING THAT THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT IMPOSE CHARGES FOR FUNDING COUNTYWIDE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PROGRAM WHEREAS, The Environmental Protection Agency, under amendments to the 1987 Federal Clean Water Act, imposed regulations that mandate local governments to control and reduce the amount of stormwater pollutant runoff into receiving waters. WHEREAS, under the authority of California Porter -Cologne Water Quality Act, the State Water Resources Control Board has delegated authority to its regional boards to invoke permitting requirements upon counties and cities. WHEREAS, in July 1991, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board notified San Mateo County of the requirement to submit an NPDES Permit Application by November 30, 1992. WHEREAS, in furtherance of the NPDES Permit Process, San Mateo County in conjunction with all incorporated cities in San Mateo County has prepared a Stormwater Manager Plan which has a General Program as a fundamental component of the Management Plan. WHEREAS, the Stormwater Management Plan has been submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board and that Management Plan has been approved by the Board and made part of NPDES Waste Discharge Permit CA 0029921, issued September 13, 1993 and remaining in effect through June 30, 1998. WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Flood Control District Act, as amended by the State Legislature in 1992 (Assembly Bill 2635), authorizes the San Mateo County Flood Control District to impose charges to fund storm drainage programs such as the NPDES Program; Countywide General Program charges for Fiscal Year 1997/98 as anticipated to be $958,900 or; Single Family Resident: $3.44/APN; Miscellaneous, Agricultural, Vacant and Condominium: $1.72/APN; all other land uses a base rate of $3.44/APN plus $0.3127 per 1,000 additional square feet of parcel area. WHEREAS, the City has held a hearing upon the proposal to fund the Countywide NPDES General Program through the San Mateo County Flood Control District; and City Council makes the below resolve following that hearing. Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame that: The City of Burlingame respectfully requests the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, acting as the governing board of the San Mateo County Flood Control District, to impose those charges necessary to fund the Countywide NPDES General Program; and 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors. A- p'/} Mayor I, Judith Malfatti, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7th day of J111 Y , 1997 and as adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: HARRISON, JANNEY, KNIGHT, O'MHONY, SPINELLI NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE i CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVER 1997.98 PROGRAM BUDGET JULY 1, 1997 - JUNE 30, 1998 lby fund) NPDES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PROGRAM FUND PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The program is a response to the mandate imposed by federal and state legislation and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board directing San Mateo County to obtain a stormwater discharge permit. CCAG has been designated by its members as the administrator of the program for all of the jurisdictions that have joined together as co -permittee agencies. This year's program will continue to carry out the mandate of the Stormwater Management Plan and its main objective of implementing a comprehensive storm water quality management program to protect the water quality of San Francisco Bay, the Pacific Ocean and San Mateo County tributary streams from the adverse effects of stormwater caused pollution. ESTIMATED BEGINNING BALANCE S 206,577 RESERVE BALANCE $100,903 PROJECTED REVENUES Interest Earnings $ 12,000 NPDES Fee' $839,300 TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUES $ 851,300 TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS $1,057,877 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Administration Services $ 125,499 Professional Services $ 112,204 Consulting Services' $ 604,300 Supplies $ 1,500 Prof. Dues & Membership' $ 111,400 Conferences & Meetings $ 3,500 Publications $ 500 NPDES Distributions $0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES S 958,900 NET CHANGE $1107,6001 TRANSFER TO RESERVES $0 TOTAL USE OF FUNDS $958,900 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 98,977 RESERVE FUND BALANCE $100,903 'NPDES Fee - Assumed the same contribution rate as 1996-97. 2Consulting services ere provided by EOA. 3Cansists of Permits and Regional Assessment lees. 1 2 m IN IIIIIIIIII IN I m 0 D o r n n a 8 m O m ryM� fDf9 VM,NJI N N In O O m S � � � IfVVn9 W � W NN � � � N � �(`Q9pVJll� Y� f9 a W W m O 8 In S O A O ai W N O y O W Opi w pp {N� N � m UOu 0 0 0 0 ON OL $ 8 ' 1pypyph pl C (C O Cl {Q CI NQa O m m w 1n -7 O cs�ry Np O IC f99 l9 ff99 w O a` It z a c � � c C fNly E y W r cc N y� LL W d coCD C _Fvd v �� 'p v' `s ' dm"� „ LL O7 01 G> 'c m N_ m N m$ 0 m $ a. g q E o o O g yoj W a 2• a O K 'ai m y¢ U y t c d 'o W anv@ E E N n e c $ E$ L" E m IS a a- o E w a`_i 'n d + o 1'3 m 'o } ao .Y u°'f' ag`�' agL'� gEv •!L�2 Uc E oU 0 o U 0o a ¢ d m m o OUa w Uc za W w Y! K $E Fa Xm m N w W COO U G m O W L L :E[ v FQ z U S Q Sheetl BUDGET PROJECTION THROUGH FY 1999/2000 4/8/97 NPDES Estimated Revenue for Fiscal Year 1997/98, including interest, _ $851,300 Budget year Actual Budget Adjustments Net Budget FY 1994/95 $1,104,363 $0 $1,104,363 FY 1995/96 $907,903 $0 $907,903 FY 1996/97 $906,000 ($60,000) Note #1 $846,000 FY 1997/98 $958,900 ($128,000) Note #2 $830,900 FY 1998/99 $855,800 $0 $855,800 FY 1999/00 $881,500 $0 $881,500 Note #1 Actual Budget includes a one-time cost of $34,000 for Permit Renewal preparation and a $26,000 carry-over of unexpended funds from previous year. Note #2 Actual Budget includes a one-time cost of $128,000 for Permit Renewal Application WITH PROJECTED CARRY-OVER OF UNEXPENDED FUNDS FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS, CURRENT FEES SHOULD FUND THE PROGRAM THROUGH _ FISCAL YEAR 1999/00. Page 1