Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Reso - CC - 040-1999
RESOLUTION 40-1999 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY AND BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT (BART) REGARDING LANDSCAPING AND TREE REPLACEMENT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) is pursuing an extension of its rail line to the City of Millbrae, which would involve the construction of tailtracks within the City of Burlingame; and WHEREAS, BART and its designee, SamTrans, has to acquire certain rights of way to construct those tailtracks, which includes a portion of a 25 -foot wide easement owned by the City of Burlingame for tree planting and drainage purposes and two small parcels of land also owned by the City; and WHEREAS, BART has told the City of Burlingame that it will use the power of eminent domain and court litigation to acquire this property; and WHEREAS, the City does not endorse or approve the extension project or the tailtracks, the EIR's or EIS's prepared for the project or the tailtracks, or any aspect of the project or the tailtracks except as expressly compelled pursuant to the negotiated memoranda of understanding, executed deeds, and executed right of way contracts that are approved concurrently with this Resolution; and WHEREAS, after negotiation, BART and the City of Burlingame are prepared to enter into a series of memoranda and contracts that will provide compensation to the City for the removal of trees, implementation of a landscape barrier along the rail line, and reserve appropriate drainage easements for City purposes; and WHEREAS, the memorandum of understanding regarding landscaping and tree replacement will provide the funding to allow the City to replace trees that are being removed from former City property by the BART extension and to construct a landscaping barrier between the rail line and California Drive to reduce the visual impact of the extension project; and WHEREAS, the trees will not be replaced in the same area because of the expanse of the BART project, but will help beautify other portions of the City for the benefit of the public, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The City Manager is authorized to execute the memorandum of understanding regarding landscaping and tree replacement contained in Exhibit A hereto by and behalf of the City of Burlingame subject to non -substantive changes as the Manager may deem necessary to effectuate the intent of the Council and subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. 2. The City Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager. 3. The delivery of the memorandum of understanding is expressly conditioned on the execution and delivery of the following by BART or its designee: A. Technical MOU approved by concurrent resolution of the Council. B. Right of Way Contract for Assessor Parcel Numbers 025-164-010 and 025-165-010 and payment by SamTrans of $1,000 pursuant to the right-of-way contract. C. Payment of $116,100 by SamTrans or BART as provided in the Landscaping and Tree Replacement MOU. 4. The City Director of Public Works is further authorized to execute and authorize the encroachment permits provided for in this MOU regarding landscaping and tree replacement. �o.�.—may � • ��o'-c�ca�`� MAYOR I, JUDITH A. MALFATTI, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 3 rd day of MAY 1999, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: GALL I GAN, JANNEY, KNIGHT, 0' MAHONY, SP I NELL I NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE CITY CLERK C:\ WP51 \FILES\BARTUandscapemou. res. wpd MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT O THE CITY OF BURLINGAME REGARDING LANDSCAPING AND TREE REPLACEMENT 29 April 1999 THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING LANDSCAPING AND TREE REPLACEMENT (the "MOU") between the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a general law city of the State of California (the "City"), and the SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT ("BART") (collectively, the "Parties") is entered into as of this day of 1999 (the "Effective Date"). RECITALS A. BART is constructing and intends to operate an 8.7 -mile extension of its existing regional transit system from the Colma Station to stations at the San Francisco International Airport and in Millbrae, known as the BART -San Francisco Airport Extension (the "Project"). B. The Project calls for construction of tailtrack and related facilities and structures within the City (collectively, the "Tailtrack"). C. In order to implement the Project, BART and the San Mateo County Transit District ("SamTrans"), BART's partner in the Project, intend to acquire certain properties within the City of Burlingame, including by the power of eminent domain, if necessary. The Parties acknowledge that the City does not support or endorse the Project. Both Parties recognize the expense, time, effort and risk in entering into eminent domain litigation. The terms set forth in this MOU, the Technical Memorandum of Understanding (the "Technical MOU"), and any deed 29 April 1999 or any Right of Way Contract entered into by and between the City and BART, or its partner SamTrans, have been agreed upon to avoid such litigation. D. BART has obtained from Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc., two surveys of the trees located within the City that will be removed or otherwise affected by construction of the Tailtrack (the "Tree Surveys'). The Tree Surveys consist of a "Report on Impact of a Wall on a Row of Trees on California Drive, Burlingame, Re: SFO Airport Extension" dated November 19, 1997 (the "California Drive Tree Survey'), attached as Attachment A hereto; and a "Tree Survey, BART SFO Extension, Burlingame, California" dated February 4, 1999, with an Addendum dated April 21, 1999 (together, the "Landscaping Easement Tree Survey"), attached as Attachment B hereto. E. At the City's request, the plan for construction of the Tailtrack included a visual wall approximately seven feet to the east of California Drive, from Murchison Drive on the north to Dufferin Avenue on the south (the "Visual Wall") on property owned by the City and County of San Francisco, over which SamTrans has an Order for Possession. The Visual Wall was included as an option in BART's Contract No. 12YU-110. The City, as reflected in the vote of the City Council on June 10, 1998, desires that the Visual Wall be replaced with a landscaping barrier, including soil preparation, removing and replacing trees and other vegetation, irrigation, landscaping, systems and supporting structures (the "Landscaping Barrier"), in the area shown on Attachment C. The City is willing to construct the Landscaping Barrier, and BART is willing to contribute certain 29 April 1999 funds toward construction of the Landscaping Barrier that would have been used in construction of the Visual Wall. F. The City currently owns a landscaping easement (the "Landscaping Easement") over a parcel of property currently owned by the Texo Realty Corporation (the "Texo Property"). BART intends to acquire a portion of the Texo Property in fee and requires use of another portion temporarily during construction of the Project. In connection with its use of these portions of the Texo Property, BART will need to clear the City's interest in the Landscaping Easement from the areas listed as parcels D -3707-1D and D-3709-1, as shown on Attachment D, and further requires an encroachment permit over the area listed as parcels D-3707-4 and D- 3709-4, also shown on Attachment D, for the duration of the construction period. G. In connection with construction of the Project, BART intends to remove or cause to be removed one hundred thirty-three (13 3) trees owned by the City now located in the City's Landscaping Easement or on other property owned by the City (the "City Trees"), as identified in Attachment E. H. BART and the City enter into this MOU to provide for replacement of one hundred twenty-nine (129) of the City Trees, the City's construction of the Landscaping Barrier and BART's contribution thereto, and BART's acquisition of a portion of the City's interest in the Texo Property. I. Concurrently with the execution of this MOU, BART and the City are entering into the Technical MOUwith respect to construction of the Project within the City. Also concurrently with the execution of this MOU, the City and BART or BART's designee will enter into a Right of Way Contract under which the City 29 April 1999 will convey to SamTrans, on behalf of BART, grant deeds to certain real properties. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, BART and the City, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, agree as follows: 1. City Tree Replacement. With the exception of the trees identified in Section LA below, BART will pay for replacement of all City Trees removed by BART or its contractor(s), on a 2:1 basis, plus planting costs. The City shall have no responsibility for removal of any trees within the BART right of way. A. Excluded Trees. The City acknowledges that BART will not be responsible to replace, to make any tree replacement payment under Section LB below or to pay any damage or removal claim by the City for: (i) four City -owned trees (numbered 10, 23, 24 and 117 in the Landscaping Easement Tree Survey) which will be removed for construction of the Tailtrack but which, according to the Landscaping Easement Tree Survey, are dead; (ii) any trees removed by BART or by the City from the Landscaping Barrier area; and (iii) any trees not owned by the City. B. City Tree Replacement Payment. With respect to each of the 129 City Trees to be removed by BART and replaced by the City, BART shall pay Three Hundred Dollars ($300) for each replacement tree, and One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150) for the cost of planting each such replacement tree. BART will replace each of 4 29 April 1999 the 129 City Trees on a 2:1 basis. Thus, each of the 129 City Trees will be replaced by the City with two replacement trees, at a cost of $300 per tree and $150 for the planting of each tree, for a total payment of Nine Hundred Dollars ($900) for each of the City Trees to be replaced. The total BART payment for the replacement of City Trees shall not exceed One Hundred Sixteen Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($116,100). C. Time of Pg=ent. BART will make the City Tree replacement payments due under this MOU concurrently with the City's delivery to BART or BART's designee of the quitclaim deed described in Section 3 below. D. Tree Surveys, The City accepts as accurate the contents of the Tree Surveys as to the identities, locations and pre -construction conditions of all trees listed in the Tree Surveys. E. Location of Replacement Trees. The City must use any City Tree replacement payment from BART under this MOU to plant trees or have trees planted at any location within the City that the City chooses, except within Project property. F. BART Responsibility After Payment Other than BART's obligations under Sections LB of this MOU, BART shall have no further responsibility, obligation or liability of any kind to the City with respect to any trees, shrubbery, or landscaping located on Project property. BART shall have no responsibility to oversee the City's replacement program or any liability for any replacement trees planted by the City from funds paid under this MOU or for their maintenance. After construction of the Tailtrack is complete, any trees or plants located on Project property in the City will be maintained by BART in accordance with 29 April 1999 BART's normal policies and procedures for such trees and plants. BART shall have no maintenance responsibilities for trees, plants or landscaping located outside the Project property. 2. Landscaping Barrier. The Landscaping Barrier will be composed of new hedges, shrubbery, irrigation and trees, as the City may find suitable for the location, and its construction will involve removal of existing trees and vegetation, soil preparation and installation of landscaping support structure as necessary. The design and composition of the Landscaping Barrier will be the sole responsibility of the City, subject to Section 2.E of this MOU. The City agrees to design the Landscaping Barrier and put it in place, or to cause it to be designed and put in place. In accordance with the terms of this MOU, BART will pay the City its actual costs for design and construction of the Landscaping Barrier, not to exceed One Hundred Sixty-one Thousand Dollars ($161,000). Any costs of the Landscaping Barrier in excess of $161,000 shall be borne by the City. In no event shall BART pay more than $161,000 toward the Landscaping Barrier. The BART payment for the Landscaping Barrier will be made in two installments. A. Initial Payment. BART's initial payment for the Landscaping Barrier under this MOU shall be made only upon completion of Phase 1 of construction of the Landscaping Barrier and submittal of an acceptable invoice by the City. For purposes of this MOU, Phase 1 shall consist of design of the Landscaping Barrier; removing shrubs and half the trees located in the Landscaping Barrier area before BART construction; planting thirty-six (36) twenty -four -inch box trees; planting a hedge; pruning the remaining trees; and installing landscaping support structures 6 29 April 1999 and an irrigation system. Phase 1 shall be completed by December 31, 2000. The City's estimated cost for Phase 1 is One Hundred Twenty-nine Thousand Dollars ($129,000). B. Final Payment. Phase 2 shall consist of removal of the remainder of the existing trees, planting another thirty-six (36) twenty -four -inch box trees and such other planting or action as may be necessary to complete the Landscaping Barrier in accordance with the plans and specifications provided to BART under Section 2.E below. Phase 2 shall be completed by July 31, 2004. The City's estimated cost for Phase 2 is Thirty-two Thousand Dollars ($32,000). Upon completion of Phase 2, the City will invoice BART for its final payment no later than July 31, 2004 or six months prior to close out of BART's Full Funding Grant Agreement with the FTA (the "FFGA'), whichever is earlier. If BART has reason to believe that the FFGA close out will occur prior to January 31, 2005, BART will give the City at least fifteen months' prior notice of the projected date of the FFGA close out; the date for the City's completion of the Landscaping Barrier and the date for submission of the City's invoice shall be advanced, both to no later than six months prior to the projected FFGA close out date. C. Replacement of Visual Wall. The City agrees that BART shall not construct the Visual Wall and that BART shall have no further obligation to the City relating to construction of the Visual Wall. D. Trees Removed. None of the trees removed from the Landscaping Barrier area, whether by BART during construction of the Project or by the City, are subject to City Tree replacement payments under Section LA above or to tree damage and 29 April 1999 removal claims by the City, and BART shall have no liability for removal or replacement of such trees. In connection with construction of the Project, BART plans to remove eight trees (numbered 5,6,7,8,9, 10, 23 and 24 in the California Drive Tree Survey) from the Landscaping Barrier area, and the City agrees that no authorization is needed for such removal by BART or its contractor. If BART's construction schedule calls for it to remove any additional trees from the Landscaping Barrier area before the City does so, BART will notify the City of its intention to remove such trees and receive the City's authorization prior to removal. E. BART Review. The City agrees to construct the Landscaping Barrier in accordance with plans and specifications reviewed and approved by BART. BART shall have thirty (30) business days from receipt of final plans and specifications to respond. F. Failure to Complete In the event that the City has not completed the Landscaping Barrier on or before July 31, 2004, the City and BART will meet and confer, and BART in its discretion may elect to finish construction of the Landscaping Barrier in accordance with the City's approved plans and specifications. The City shall cooperate with BART in completion of the construction. The City's cooperation will include, but not be limited to, providing BART with (i) copies of any plans or designs for the Landscaping Barrier that BART may request; (ii) permits and authorizations as appropriate for finishing construction of the Landscaping Barrier; and (iii) access to the City property on which the Landscaping Barrier is being constructed at the location shown on Attachment C. BART will make no 29 April 1999 further payment to the City for the Landscaping Barrier if the Landscaping Barrier is not completed on or before July 31, 2004. G. Maintenance. The City shall be solely responsible for maintenance of any trees, plantings or landscaping that are, or may in the future be, located in the Landscaping Barrier. BART shall have no responsibilities for maintenance or otherwise of any trees, plants or landscaping located outside Project property. 3. Landscaping Easement and Texo Prop. In consideration of BART's undertakings in this MOU and the Technical MOU, and concurrently with the execution of this MOU, the City will quitclaim to SamTrans, on behalf of BART, all of its right, title and interest in the portion of the Texo Property labeled as BART parcels D -3707-1D and D-3709-1 on Attachment D, reserving to the City, as appropriate, easements for utilities currently located or being relocated within the Texo Property. The quitclaim deed to be delivered to SamTrans regarding the Texo Property and the Landscaping Easement shall be in the form of Attachment F. The City further agrees to provide BART or BART's contractor(s), following execution of this MOU and upon request by BART or BART's contractor(s), with access to the areas labeled as D-3707-4 and D-3709-4 on Attachment D under an encroachment permit in the form of Attachment G. 4. Miscellaneous A. Payment by BART pursuant to this MOU will be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of an acceptable invoice supported by such evidence as BART may 29 April 1999 reasonably require. All invoices shall be made in writing and delivered or mailed to BART as follows: The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District West Bay Extensions 800 Madison Street P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, California 94604-2688 Attention: Assistant Controller With a copy to: The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District West Bay Extensions 979 Broadway Millbrae, California 94030 Attention: Group Manager, Design and Construction Engineering Support B. The City agrees to perform all work in accordance with rates which are (i) reasonable and (ii) usually and customarily charged by the City for work performed by the City in the normal course of its business. The City agrees that only actual allowable, allocable, necessary and reasonable costs are reimbursable by BART. Whether work is performed by the forces of the City or by a third party, no City profit is allowed. The City's costs (excluding third party costs) shall comply with OMB Circular A-87 and 49 CFR Part 18, and the City will conform with the applicable requirements of FTA Circulars 5010.B and 4220. ID. In the event third parties perform work on behalf of the City under this MOU, the cost principles set forth in OMB Circular A-87 or, as appropriate, 48 CFR Part 31 shall be used to determine the allowability, allocability, and reasonableness of costs subject to reimbursement by BART. 10 29 April 1999 C. BART reserves the right to review records, reports, payrolls, accounts, documents and any data relevant to this MOU for purposes of making determinations on the acceptability of any billing submitted by the City to BART. BART will notify the City of any billing or portion thereof which is not deemed acceptable and may withhold such amounts from any payments due to be made to the City or may request reimbursement of such amounts from the City. D. (i.) The City agrees to establish and maintain, and to require its contractor(s) to establish and maintain, records pertaining to the fiscal activities of work under this MOU, which records shall show the actual time devoted and the costs incurred by the City with respect to any work performed under this MOU. The accounting systems of the City and its contractor(s) shall conform to generally accepted accounting principles, and all records shall provide a breakdown of total costs charged to the Project, including properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices and vouchers. Upon written request, the City shall, at a mutually convenient time, permit BART, the Secretary of Transportation, the Comptroller General of the United States, and their representatives to inspect, examine, re- examine, and copy the City's and its contractor's books, records, accounts, and any and all data relevant to this MOU for the purpose of auditing and verifying costs charged to BART by the City pursuant to this MOU, and shall provide such assistance as may be reasonably required in the course of such inspection. The City and/or its contractor(s) shall, at BART's request, provide a letter of representation concerning its usual and ordinary charges for work similar to the 11 29 April 1999 work to be performed under this MOU, as well as the accounting systems utilized by the City and its contractor(s) for work to be performed under this MOU. (ii.) BART reserves the right, for itself, the Secretary of Transportation, the Comptroller General of the United States, and their authorized representatives, to examine and re-examine such books, records, payrolls, accounts and data during the three (3) year period after payments under this MOU and until all pending matters are closed, and the City and its contractor(s) shall in no event dispose of said books, records, payrolls, accounts and data in any manner whatsoever for three (3) years after the payments under this MOU or until all pending matters are closed, whichever is later. E. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 8546.7, the Parties shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of BART or as part of any audit of BART by the State Auditor, for a period of three (3) years after all payments under this MOU. The examination and audit shall be confined to those matters connected with the performance of this MOU, including, but not limited to, the cost of administering the MOU. F. Neither BART nor any director, officer, agent or employee of BART is responsible for any damages or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the City, its officers, agents, employees and consultants, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction assumed by or assigned to the City under this MOU. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, the City will fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend in any claim or litigation BART, its directors, officers, agents and employees from any damage or 12 29 April 1999 liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the City, its officers, agents, employees and consultants under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction assumed by or assigned to the City under this MOU. The duty of the City to indemnify and hold harmless, as set forth above, shall include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code provided, however, that nothing herein shall be construed to require the City to indemnify BART, its directors, officers, agents and employees against any responsibility or liability in contravention of Section 2782 of the California Civil Code. G. Neither the City nor any officer, agent or employee of the City is responsible for any damages or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by BART, its directors, officers, agents, employees and consultants, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction assumed by or assigned to BART under this MOU. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, BART will fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend in any claim or litigation the City, its officers, agents and employees from any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by BART, its directors, officers, agents, employees and consultants under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction assumed by or assigned to BART under this MOU. The duty of BART to indemnify and hold harmless, as set forth above, shall include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code provided, however, that nothing herein shall be construed to require BART to 13 29 April 1999 indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees against any responsibility or liability in contravention of Section 2782 of the California Civil Code. H. All notices required hereunder may be given by either personal delivery, U.S. mail, courier service (e.g. Federal Express) or telecopier transmission. Notices shall be effective upon receipt at the following addresses: To BART by U.S. Mail: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, CA 94604-2688 Attention: General Manager Telefax (510) 464-6009 With a copy to: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 979 Broadway Millbrae, CA 94030 Attention: Executive Manager Telefax (650) 689-8321 To BART by personal or San Francisco Bay Area special delivery: Rapid Transit District 800 Madison Street Oakland, CA 94604-2688 Attention: General Manager With a copy to: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 979 Broadway Millbrae, CA 94030 To City: City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010-3997 Attention: City Manager Telefax (650) 342-8386 14 29 April 1999 I. Nothing in this MOU is intended to nor does establish the Parties as partners, co - venturers or principal and agent with one another. I This MOU shall be interpreted under and pursuant to the laws of the State of California. The Parties agree that the jurisdiction and venue of any dispute between the Parties to this MOU shall be the Superior Court of San Mateo County. K. This MOU shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the transferees, successors and assigns of each of the Parties to it, except that there shall be no transfer of any interest by either of the Parties to this MOU except pursuant to the terms of the MOU. L. No right or remedy conferred upon or reserved to BART or the City under this MOU is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy, except as expressly stated in this MOU, and each and every right and remedy shall be cumulative and in addition to any other right or remedy given under this MOU or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute, except such rights or remedies as are expressly limited in this MOU. M. In addition to specific provisions of this MOU, performance by either Party shall not be deemed to be in default where delays or defaults are due to war, insurrection, strikes, lockouts, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, quarantine restrictions, casualties, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, epidemic, government restrictions on priorities, freight embargoes, shortage of labor or materials, unusually inclement weather, lack of transportation, court order, or any other similar causes beyond the control or without the fault of the Party claiming 15 29 April 1999 an extension of time to perform. An extension of time for any cause will be deemed granted if notice by the Party claiming such extension is sent to the other Party within thirty (30) days from the commencement of the cause and such extension is not rejected in writing by the other Party within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice. Time of performance under this MOU may also be extended by mutual written MOU, signed by both Parties. N. No director, member, official, employee or agent of the City or BART shall be personally liable to any Party to this MOU or to any successor in interest in the event of any default or breach of this MOU or for any amount which may become due on any obligation under the terms of this MOU. O. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this MOU is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall continue in full force and effect unless the rights and obligations of the Parties have been materially altered or abridged by such invalidation, voiding or unenforceability. P. This MOU shall not be effective without the execution by both Parties and delivery, under due legal authority, of the Technical MOU and the Right of Way Contract, and the delivery to BART or BART's designee of the executed Quitclaim Deed (Attachment F) and any deeds relating to the Right of Way Contract. Q. This MOU represents the full, complete and entire MOU of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes any and all other communications, representations, proposals, understandings or MOUs, whether 16 29 April 1999 written or oral, between the Parties with respect to such subject matter. This MOU may not be modified or amended, in whole or in part, except by a writing signed by an authorized officer or representative of each of the Parties. This MOU is made and entered into as of the date set forth above. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT an Approved as to form: Office of the General Counsel an BART Attorney CITY OF BURLINGAME LN Approved as to form: in 17 Burlingame Attorney 29 April 1999 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A California Drive Tree Survey ATTACHMENT B Landscaping Easement Tree Survey ATTACHMENT C Landscape Barrier Area Map ATTACHMENT D Texo Property ATTACHMENT E City Trees Replacement ATTACHMENT F Landscaping Easement Quitclaim Deed ATTACHMENT G City Encroachment Permit ATTACHMENT A TREESURVEY T No. Species DBH Dict from curb Dict wall to curb Comments (inches) 1 Causarina 20.0 2.0 7 Minor pruning for wall. 2 22.8 2.0 3 " 18.0 2.8 " q " 15.7 2.5 5 18.5 2.3 6 10.1 2.9 " 7 13.8 2.4 g 17.3 2.3 " 9 20.2 2.2 " 10 21.1 2.5 Heavy limb over (@ 24') parking. 14.2 2.7 Minor decay and wall 11 clearance „ 20.3 1.8 Minor pruning for wall. 12 (@36') 13 13.5 2.5 Leans, poor form. (@24,) Recommend removal. 14 Poplar 15.0, 19.6 2.0 Very poor structure and decay. Recommend removal 15 Causarina 17.7 2.7 Some decay. Minor wall clearance. 19.3 2.0 IT Minor wall clearance. 16 17 15.8 2.3 " (@ 24") 18 14.2 2.2 19 IT 17.7 2.5 IT 20 " 15.6 2.2 „ 15.0 2.1 Some trunk decay. Minor 21 wall clearance. Page 1 TREESURVEY rL1 -40 Species DBH Dist. from curb Diet wall to curb Comments (inches) 22 Causarina 15.5 2.7 7 Small trunk decay. Minor wall clearance. 23 14.8 2.6 7 Some trunk decay. Minor wall clearance. 24 14.6 2.6 Poor structure. Low, heavy limb over parking. Remove low limb using 14 inch diameter cut. 25 " 17.2 2,7 Decay in trunk. Minor wall clearance. 26 217 2.0 Trunk decay. Large trunk (@ 24") wound. 27 14.3 2.6 Trunk wound. 28 14.7 2.7 29 17.0 2.5 Remove low, large limb for (@ 24') wall clearance. 30 16.5 2.5 Remove low limbs for wall clearance. 31 16.0, 2.5 Minor wall clearance. 15.6 32 15.5 2.6 33 15.3 2.9 Remove low limb for wall clearance. 34 15.6 2.4 35 18.2 2.6 (@ 12") 36 18.7 2.5 Trunk decay. Remove 12" (@ 24") limb for wall clearance. 37 Live oak 8.0 7.5 In way of wall. Remove. 38 Causarina 14.1 2.3 Minor wall clearance. 39 11.0 3.0 Trunk wound. 40 16.4 2.5 Minor wall clearance. (@ 36") Page 2 Page 3 TREESURVEY T l� Species DBH Die[ from curb Diet, wall to curb Comments (inches) 41 16.4 2.5 7 Trunk wound. 42 Live oak 9.1 10.0 Possibly can be saved. 43 Causarina 13.5 2.5 Remove low limb for wall clearance. 44 13.2 2.1 Minor wall clearance. 45 19.5 -- Heavy north low limb. (@ 24") 46 Live oak 10.8, 7.6 12.5 Tree could remain with wal (@ 24") clearance. 47 Causarina 11.5, 10. 9 2.8 Minor wall clearance. 6.0 48 16.5 2.3 „ 49 16.2 2.5 Basal wound. 50 15.8 " Minor wall clearance. �1 Acacia 15.8 18.0 Leans, but could remain. 52 8.8 16.0 „ 53 Causarina 17.7, 9.2 1.9 Remove secondary easterly trunk for wall clearance. 54 Live oak 9.0 16 Possibly could remain. 55 Causarina 24.7 1.9 Major limb removal for @ 36") wall clearance. 56 14.2 2.7 Minor wall clearance. 57 Acacia 12.0, 8.3 20 Could remain. 58 Causarina 7.0 15 Could remain. Trunk crack. 59 14.4, 9.4 2.4 Minor wall clearance. 60 10.3, 8.3 1.5 Poor form. 61 12.2 2.5 Minor wall clearance. 62 14.6 2.5 „ Page 3 TREESURVEY , Species DBH Dist from curb Dist wall to curb t omments (inches) 63 Causarina 64 65 66 Acacia . 12.6 2.8 7 Minor wall clearance. 17.1 2.7 11.6 2.8 10.5, 9.7 5.7 If wall extends this far, 1 67 Causarina 18.0 2.0 68 Eucalyptus 33.2 24.6 69 38.0 17.0 70 29.9 20.0 71 20.3 10.0 " tree will need remova . Minor wall clearance. Severe damage to sur- rounding paving. Past freeze damage. Tree is dying. Recommend removal. Severe damage to sur- rounding paving. Past freeze damage. Poor structure. Repairing paving would cause significant impact to the tree's health and support. Proposed trench would cause significant root damage. Recommend removal. Proposed trench would cause significant root damage. Recommend removal. Topped for line clearance. Proposed trench would cause significant root damage. Recommend removal. Note: Many small acacias between the proposed wall and trench could be left. I also recommend leaving shrubs along the road as screen from the wall. Page 4 I believe the wall will not have any significant root impacts to any of the street trees. However, the wall will require the removal of several trees, Numbers 37. 42, 46, 51, 52 and 66 The main problem will be the placement of the piers; making sure they arc as far away from any tree as possible. I recommend haing Atvthis�time,er holes mitigatingsmeasures anted to ebeine the ecomm recommended for individ algtrees. mae, if arty. I also believe that if the proposed utility trench is kept 10 feet from the street trees, damage will be minimized. This trench, however, could impact any trees away from the curb. The only construction impacts which are definite will be pruning for wall clearance. Some trees will require more than others but mitigating measures are not needed. I believe this report is accurate and based on sound arboricultural principles. �e --END-- No. µ!C 0119 0 Page 5 ATTACHMENT B TREE SURVEY BART SFO EXTENSION BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: BAY AREA TRANSIT CONSULTANTS 979 Broadway Millbrae, California 94030 Contact: Barbara Inaba Telephone (650) 689-8586 Prepared by: MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMPANY, INCORPORATED 535 Bragato Road, Suite A San Carlos, California 94070-6228 Richard L. Huntington Telephone (650) 593-4400 Facsimile (650) 593-4443 February 4, 1999 ©Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa¢e 1.0 Summary 1 2.0 Introduction 1 3.0 Method 1 4.0 Tree Survey 3 5.0 Observations and Conclusions 10 6.0 APPENDIX Tree Location Maps TREESURVEY But SFO Extension, Burlingame, CA Richard L. Huntington 1.0 SUMMARY The Bay Area Rapid Transit District will require the removal of many of the trees east of the Southern Pacific Railroad Tracks, from Murchison Drive to Trousdale Drive in Burlingame, California. The trees to be removed are mostly bluegum eucalyptus that were planted as a windbreak nearly one hundred years ago. In addition, there are many seedlings and suckers. Many of the trees had been topped for utility line clearing purposes. Of the one hundred and fourteen trees inspected, only a couple can be considered good specimens. Although the total canopy cover to be removed is substantial, the loss of habitat for fauna is minimal, as a few vertebrates (or invertebrates) appear to be inhabiting the area. On January 20 and February 2, 1999, the trees east of the railroad tracks and west of the culvert opposite where Murchison Drive in Burlingame meets California Drive, were inspected. These trees extend in a straight line east of the railroad tracks opposite Trousdale Drive. The purpose of the inspection was to provide information on the species, size, condition and functional value of each tree. This information can be used to arrive at an appraised value of the linear stand, composed of one hundred and fourteen trees. 3.0 METHOD A tree, for purposes of this report, is a woody single or multiple trunk specimen that is a least four (4) inches in diameter, measured fifty-four inches high. This measurement, given as diameter in inches, is known as diameter breast high (DBH). Where several trunks exist at fifty-four inches in height, the largest diameter, plus one-half the sum of the remaining diameters, is given as a single trunk size. This size appears in parenthesis. Sometimes it is more appropriate to measure the diameter at a height other than DBH, and to extrapolate to the DBH. When this occurs, the estimated diameter is again presented in parentheses. There are many suckers and seedling volunteers from the parent trees that are undersized and are not included in the report. In addition, there are some stumps of large trees that were cut down that developed watersprouts. Unless the watersprouts attained the minimum diameter, they too were not included in this report. MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMPANY February 4, 1999 Page 1 TREESURVEY Bart SFO Extension, Burlingame, CA Richard L. Huntington The trees were located in the field with the aid of the Site Grading, Drainage and Paving Plans, dated June 12, 1997, and two aerial photographs. Each tree was identified and tagged with a 1/2 x 1 inch green plastic strip stapled to the trunk about 5 feet high. The tree number is embossed on the strip. This same number is used to identify the trees in this report as well as on the tree location maps found in the Appendix of this report. The condition of each tree relates to the noted vitality and stability. Many of the trees in this stand are coppice sprouts or suckers from roots and have low condition ratings. The are as follows: 0-29 ....................... Very poor 30-49 ..................... Poor 50-69 ..................... Fair 70-89 ...................... Good 90-100 .................... Excellent structural from stumps condition ratings The placement of each tree refers to where the tree is growing and its contribution to the environment from that particular placement. The scale of ratings is the same as that for the condition. In most cases, the placement rating is fair (60), unless the trees were growing beneath utility lines or were too close together. The latter causes competition, which affects the form or architecture of the tree, as well as the vitality. The contribution rating in most cases is also fair, as the row acts as a windbreak and a screen from the adjacent manufacturing plants and the railroad. The entire area (site) is rated as 70% (good), as it is in a high value commercial (light industry) area. The tree factors: condition, placement and site, are averaged to provide a location percentage. This percentage is necessary for appraisal purposes. The remarks column generally reflects on the condition or placement rating. Since these trees are to be removed in order to make the improvements, no remedial tree work advice is given. MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMPANY February 4, 1999 Page 2 TREESURVEY Bart SFO Extension, Burlingame, CA Richard L. Huntington 4.0 TREE SURVEY Tree No. Species DBH Cond. Place Contrib. Remarks I Blue gum 39.9 5 60 50 Topped for utility line clearing. 2 Blue gum 28.1 35 60 50 S.E. lean. Too close to Tree No. 1. 2a Blue gum 7.4 20 30 30 Suppressed by Tree No. 2. 2b Blue gum 7.4 50 40 40 Suppressed by Tree No. 2. 3 Blue gum 31.3 45 60 50 Previously topped. @ 3' (30) 4 Blue gum 24.9 5 60 50 Dying. Extensive heart rot fungus. 5 Blue gum 7.5, 50 60 50 Stump sprouts from a previously 11.0 cut down tree. (14.8) 6 Red gum 46.6 90 60 50 None. 7 Red gum 34.6 50 60 50 Leans. 8 Red gum 46.3 35 60 50 Leans. Asymmetrical. Poor structure. 9 Red flowering 22.1 5 60 50 See remarks, Tree No. 8. gum @ 1' (18) 10 Red gum 22.2 0 60 0 Dead. 11 Blue gum 64.5 60 60 50 History of limb failures. Co- dominant trunks. 12 Manna gum 48.4 40 60 50 Southerly trunk has been topped. 13 Manna gum 18.4 30 60 50 Heart rot at the central upper crotch. 14 Blue gum 8.2, 55 60 50 Codominant trunks. 41.3 (45.4) MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMPANY February 4, 1999 Page 3 TREESURVEY Bart SFO Extension, Burlingame, CA Richard L. Huntington 4.0 TREE SURVEY Tree No. Species DBH Cond. Place Contrib. Remarks 15 Red gum 15.0, 50 60 50 Codominant trunks. 20.8 (28.5) 16 Blue gum 52.5 75 60 50 Codominant trunks. 17 Blue gum 39.9 40 60 50 Codominant trunks with a tight "v" crotch. 18 Blue gum 41.1 75 60 50 None. 19 Blue gum 5.5 39 30 50 Too close to Tree No. 18. Suckers from a cut down tree. 20 Blue gum 4.7, 20 60 50 See remarks, Tree No. 19. 5.4 (7.8) 21 Blue gum 44.2 30 60 50 Topped. 22 Blue gum 15.4 20 60 50 Top is dead. 23 Blue gum 6.3 0 30 50 Dead. 24 Blue gum 5.0 0 20 50 Dead. 25 Blue gum 47.4 30 60 50 Topped. 26 Blue gum 25.1 40 60 50 Topped. 27 Blue gum 6.6, 8.0, 20 20 50 Suckers from a previously cut 11.8, 8.4 down tree. Too close to Tree (23.3) No. 28. 28 Blue gum 17.2 50 60 50 None. 29 Blue gum 12.9 40 30 50 Too close to Tree No. 28. 30 Blue gum 2, 2, 4, 5 20 50 Too close to Tree No. 28. 5, 6 (12.5) 31 Blue gum 8.6, 30 60 50 Topped. 67.9 (72.2) 32 Blue gum 16.7 5 20 50 Topped. Too close to Tree No. 31. MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMPANY February 4, 1999 Page 4 TREESURVEY Bart SFO Extension, Burlingame, CA Richard L. Huntington 1.0 TREE SURVEY Tree No. Species DBH Cond. Place Contrib. Remarks 33 Blue gum 10.8 10 30 50 See remarks, Tree No. 27. Too close to No. 34. 34 Blue gum 8.3, 30 60 50 Topped. 14.8 (19.0) 35 Blue gum 19.2 70 60 50 None. 36 Blackwood acacia 4.4 40 60 50 Poor structure. 37 Blackwood acacia 4.7 40 30 50 Too close to Tree No. 36. 38 Blue gum 8.2, 8.4 30 60 50 Poor structure. 39 Blackwood acacia 5.4 50 60 50 None. 40 Blackwood acacia 7.3 60 60 50 None. 41 Blackwood acacia 7.6 10 60 50 Trunk scar. 42 Blue gum 42.4 20 60 50 Topped. 43 Blackwood acacia 6.4 30 60 50 Poor structure. 44 Blackwood acacia 8.1 10 20 50 Too close to Tree No. 45. Poor structure. 45 Blue gum 14.3 50 60 50 None. 46 Blackwood 4.3, 4.9 30 60 50 Codominant trunks. acacia (6.8) 47 Blue gum 84.5 20 60 50 Topped. 48 Blackwood acacia 8.6 10 60 50 Poor structure. 49 Blue gum 2, 3, 3, 5 60 50 Suckers from a cut down tree. 4.2, 6.1, 6.2(15.4) 50 Blackwood acacia 6.5 60 60 50 None. 51 Blackwood acacia 5.3 30 10 50 Too close to Tree No. 52. Poor structure. MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMPANY February 4, 1999 Page 5 TREE SURVEY Ban SFO Extension, Burlingame, CA Richard L. Huntington 4.0 Tree No. Species 52 Red flowering gum 53 Blue gum 54 Blue gum 55 Blue gum 56 Blue gum 57 Blue gum 58 Blue gum 59 Blue gum 60 Blue gum 61 Blue gum 62 Blue gum 63 Blue gum 64 Blue gum 65 Blue gum 66 Blue gum 67 Blue gum TREESURVEY DBH Cond. Plac Contrib. Remarks 20.5 10 60 50 Topped. 4.8, 5.2, 10 30 50 Suckers. See remarks, Tree 6.6 No. 49. (11.5) 36.7 10 60 50 See remarks, Tree No. 46. @ 2' (34.0) 46.2 70 60 50 None. 36.0 10 60 50 See remarks, Tree No. 49. @ 1' (32.0) 25.3 5 60 50 Leaning, root ball uplift. 10.2, 10 60 50 See remarks, Tree No. 49. 14.1 (19.2) 7.9 50 20 50 Too close to Tree No. 60. 26.0 15 60 50 Topped. 4.8, 5.1 30 50 40 Codominant trunks. (7.5) 40.2 30 40 50 Leans. @ 3' (40.0) 37.4 30 40 50 Leans. 3.0, 4.5 20 20 50 Codominant trunks. One leans. (6.0) Too close to Tree No. 63. 3.1, 6.5, 20 20 50 Codominant trunks. One leans. 7,3 Too close to Tree No. 64. (12.0) 56.6 70 60 50 Side trimmed for line clearance. 22.1 30 30 50 Too close to Tree No. 66. MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMPANY February 4, 1999 Page 6 TREE SURVEY Ban SFO Extension, Burlingame, CA Richard L. Huntington 4:0 TREE SURVEY Tree No. Species DBH Cond. Place Contrib, Remarks 68 Blue gum 13.0 5 20 40 Topped at 10 feet. 3 feet from Tree No. 67. 69 Blue gum 48.0 20 30 40 Topped at 20 feet. @ 1" (42.0) 70 Blue gum 38.8 40 60 50 Poor structure. 71 Blue gum 8.0, 11, 30 50 50 Topped at ? 20.1 (29.6) 72 Blackwood acacia 5.8 70 60 50 None. 73 Blue gum 22.7 50 60 50 Upper poor structure. 74 Blue gum 6.2, 14.7 10 50 50 Poor structure. 90° trunk bend. (17.8) Uplifting. 75 Blue gum 18.1 20 20 40 Leans, poor structure. Too close to Tree No. 76. 76 Blue gum 53.6 20 60 50 Side trimmed for line clearance. 77 Blue gum 26.4 20 20 40 Topped, one-sided. Too close to Tree No. 76. 78 Blue gum 20.9 40 60 50 Weak structure. 79 Blue gum 15.2, 55 50 50 Codominant trunks. 10.0 (20.2) 80 Blackwood acacia 5.3 10 40 40 Topped at 8 feet. 81 Blackwood 2.8, 4.7 50 40 40 Codominant trunks. 2 feet from acacia (6.1) Tree No. 80. 82 Blue gum 35.3 40 50 50 Topped and side trimmed for line clearance. 83 Blackwood acacia 23.6 30 40 40 Multi -trunked. Poor structure. @ 1' (20.0) MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMPANY February 4, 1999 Page 7 TREE SURVEY Bart SFO Extension, Burlingame, CA Richard L. Huntington 4.0 TREE SURVEY Tree No. Species DBH Coad. Place Contrib. Remarks 84 Blackwood acacia 5.7 40 40 40 None. 85 Blackwood acacia 5.7 40 40 40 Trunk canker. 86 Blackwood acacia 10.2 50 40 40 Trunk canker. 87 Blackwood 3.7, 7.7 60 40 40 Trunk canker. acacia (9.5) 88 Blackwood acacia 7.3 60 30 40 Too close to Tree No. 89. 89 Blackwood 4.7, 7.0 60 30 40 Too close to Tree No. 90. acacia (9.3) 90 Blackwood 1.9, 4.8 60 30 40 Too close to Tree No. 89. acacia (5.7) 91 Blackwood 1.1, 4.4 60 40 40 None. acacia (5.4) 92 Blackwood acacia 5.8 60 40 40 None. @ 3' (5.0) 93 Blackwood acacia 7.0 10 30 40 Suppressed by Tree No. 94. Leans. 94 Blackwood 10.6, 18.5 5 60 50 Extensive dieback. acacia ( 23.8) 95 Blackwood 6, 7, 7, 20 60 50 Suckers from a stump. acacia 8, 9 (25) 96 Blackwood acacia 6.9 30 30 40 Too close to Tree No. 95. Leans. @ 2' (6.0) 97 Blackwood 2, 3, 6.5, 40 50 50 None. acacia 10.1 (21.3) 98 Blackwood acacia 10.7 30 40 40 Leans. 99 Blue gum 48.0 30 50 50 Suckers from stump. @ 1" (Est.) (36) MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMPANY February 4, 1999 Page 8 TREESURVEY Bart SFO Extension, Burlingame, CA Richard L. Huntington 4,0 TREE SURVEY Tree No. Species DBH Cond. Place Contrib. Remarks 100 Blue gum 1,1, 2 30 40 40 Suckers from stump. 2, 3, 5.1 (9.6) 101 Blue gum 40.3 50 60 50 None. @ 1' 102 Blue gum 56.6 35 60 60 One sided for limb clearance. @ 6" 103 Coast live oak 8.6, 11.3 40 60 60 Tight "v" crotch. (15.6) 104 Blue gum 5.7 35 60 60 See Tree No. 102. @ 1' 105 Blue gum 44.0 35 60 60 None. @ 6" (28.0) 106 Blue gum 5.3 40 10 40 Suppressed by Tree No. 105. 107 Blue gum 30.0 10 50 50 Dying. @ 1" (28.0) 108 Blue gum 30.9 35 60 60 See Tree No. 102. 109 Bailey acacia 14.7 5 20 30 Leans. Basal decay. Uprooting. @ 3' Too close to Tree No. 108. (14.0) 110 Bailey acacia 3.0, 4.5 20 20 20 Leans. (6.0) 111 Dwarf blue gum 34.6 55 60 50 None. @ 2' (28) 112 Dwarf blue gum 60.3 55 60 50 None. @ 6" (48.0) MAYNE TREE ESPERT COMPANY February 4, 1999 Page 9 TREESURVEY Bart SFO Extension, Burlingame, CA Richard L. Huntington The lineal stand of primarily eucalyptus trees has been severely abused over the years. Many trees have been cut down, with the falling trunks damaging the surrounding trees. Others have been topped, allowing decay, weakly attached limbs and poor root growth to occur. Still others have been constantly side trimmed, causing an imbalance in the trees. It is my opinion that this lineal stand is inappropriate for an area that will be frequented by the general population, as the risk of tree failures (entire or limbs) is too high. Even without a high value target, the stand is an attractive nuisance that can lead to injuries to transients, adventuresome children and others. It is my opinion that clearcutting this stand is in the best interest of the community. MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMOPANY February 4, 1999 Page 10 6.0 APPENDIX u 3 0 1a^� s DU Z j 7 Y N 0 J� b O a W m o= 0 a' u 3 0 1a^� _ DU Z j •O Y N L J� b O a W m o= 0 N Z J O O 3c a s��c U O �- 1 c W UlZ w _ F a' u 3 0 N o' N O:, _ U 6 0 3 3 of o= 3 J O Z 3c WU s��c tl �- 1 c S Nn S3? Y U y < + ^- 6 Jf < Z 2Q WU yI`� tl 0 3 o= 3 J O J 3c < a� S Nn S3? � I •9 J I N N 6 5 ig C',4 0 i O.` W W ¢g Oc/ C.W ZaZn O� G Oz Z , LLJ PF R i ' .im 7 ivF O' . Ow a W r C',4 0 'W II(U i UI N LL . • �WI W ¢g d ZaZn O� Ji F OI , NQ Z� R i Z V aN aZ m � J 4 d LU « N W ;to io �y NZ M< a W r Z X W }}� Q d ZaZn O� F OI 3 d Z� R i U�OL�m < S U j r Y U 2 4 W w 2 r�mo 4 W S < N O m� U Z <J�u Oz Io< W N Z f ZO :3 J W W^ 2 O= W J < oO ; Z Wkl o¢WaW mz Y<I Z'T.NO JL wt�WNm TO ZM gs FOy�y.�U N, j 4 p C 2 rrrYO Uz N43M2 <C J Uo0 FO U'<' Y O ¢_ 4< Ou Z N U ¢U9uO= JZ oz -y Zj UC u N L V < - ¢ Wz. z �WL JvCn< > U X03, CMO -zz= _ - N Y--< VOZ J - <WO =:z -- J =�a C h SPECIES LIST Common Name Scientific Name Bailey Acacia Acacia baileyana Blackwood acacia Acacia melanoxylon Blue gum Eucalyptus globulus Coast live oak Quercus agrifolia Dwarf blue gum Eucalyptus globulus `compacta' Manna gum Eucalyptus viminalis Red flowering gum Eucalyptus ficifolia Red gum Eucalyptus camaldulensis Received: 4/21/99 10:26AM; 04/21/99 WED"11:25 FAX 6503449848 6503449848 , BART SFO LINE & SVS; Raga 2 MAYNE TREE EXPERTS CO ADDENDUM TO THE TREE REPORT OF FEBRUARY 4, 19 9,8�q BART SFO EXTENSION BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA This addendum covers an additional 36 trees. This area runs approximately 380 feet south of the original report areas and extends to the buried Fiber Optic Cable warning sign. Prepared for: BAY AREA TRANSIT CONSULTANTS 979 Broadway Millbrae, California 94030 Contact: Barbara Inaba Telephone (650) 689-8586 Prepared by: MAYNE TREE EXPERT COMPANY, INCORPORATED 535 Bragato Road, Suite A San Carlos, California 94070-6228 Richard L. Huntington Telephone (650) 593-4400 Facsimile (650) 593-4443 April 21, 1999 cDMayne Tree Expert Company, Inc, 1999 [r.� Received: 4/21/99 10:26AM; 6503449648 -> BART SFO LINE 6 SVS; Page 3 Place 04/21/99 WED 11:25 FAX 6503449848 MAYNE TREE EXPERTS CO Z003 TREESURVEY Tree No. 31jecipsDW Cond. Place Contrite_ Reruark"s 113 Blue gum 19.4 10 60 60 Sprouts from decayed stump. @ 6', 17.0 @ 4.5' 114 Blue gum 38.5 20 60 60 Sprouts. Topped at 20'. Oozing @ 2', on limbs causing stress. 37.5 @ 4.5' 115 Blue gum 40.0 20 60 60 Sprouts. Topped at 20' @ 2', 38.0 @ 9.5' 116 Blue gum 34.0 50 60 60 Sprouts. Topped at 20'. Large @ 11, basal scar. 31.0 ®4.5 117 Bailey's 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 50 30 30 Group of suckers. West of acacia 3, 3, 4, 4, 5 No. 116. (Est.) 118 Bailey's 11.3 10 40 30 Decayed, leaning and nearly acacia dead 119 Bailey's 3. 2, 3. 5, 0 40 40 Dead. acacia 4.6 120 Blue gum 17.9 35 50 50 Leans, topped. 121 Bailey's 5.5 60 40 40 West of No. 120. acacia 122 Blue gum 48.0 40 60 60 Sprouts. Topped at 20' C 2', 46.0 @ 4.5' 123 Blue gum 2, 3, 4 25 30 30 Sprouts from 1 foot stump. (Est.) 124 Blue gum 42.0 40 60 60 See No. 122. @ 1', 40.0 @ 4.5' Page 1 Received: 4/21/99 10:26AM; 6503449848 -> BAHT SFO LINE & SYS; Page 4 Place Contrib. 04/21/99 WED 11:26 FAX 6503449848 MAYNE TREE EXPERTS CO f�j004 70 TREESURVEY Tree No. Species Cond Place Contrib. Rcmarkq 125 Live oak 3.0, 4, 5, 60 70 70 West of No, 124. Sprouts from 6.6 ground. 126 Blue gum 9.2 50 50 50 East of No. 125. Leans, topped at 20'. 127 Bailey's 12.1 0 40 40 Dead. acacia 128 Blue gum 41.0 40 60 60 See No. 122. Oil, 39 @ 4.5 129 Live oak 2.4, 4.8 70 40 40 Leans. West of No. 128. 130 Black acacia 5.6, 6.6 60 60 70 Codominant stems. 131 Live oak 4.6 70 40 40 Next to No. 130 @ 3' 132 Black acacia 15.2 50 60 70 Slightly poor structure. ® 2', 14.0 C& 4.5' 133 Live oak 2.2, 4.4, 40 40 40 Next to No. 132. Leans away 6.1 from No. 132. 134 Black acacia 4.3 20 40 40 Dead top with broken limb. 135 Blue gum 30.0 40 60 60 See No. 122. 011, 28.0 @ 4.5' 136 Black acacia 8.9, 23.6 20 60 60 West of No. 138. Large trunk sear. Decaying trunk. 137 Black acacia 8.8 30 30 30 Next to No. 135. Broken top. 138 Blue gum 6.0 40 30 30 Trunk damage. 139 Blue gum 8.8, 9.2 40 30 30 Codominant stems growing (Est.) into No. 142. 140 Blue gum 3.6, 8.2 40 30 30 Growing into No. 142. 141 Blue gum 15.2 60 40 30 Growing into No. 142. Page 2 Received: 4/21/99 10:26AM; 6503449846 -> BART SFO LINE & SYS; Page 5 04/21/99 DYED 11:26 FAX. 6503449848 MAYNE TREE EXPERTS CO 005 Tree No. Species 142 Blue gum 143 Blue gum 144 Blue gum 145 Blue gum 146 Blue gum 147 Blue gum 148 Black acacia Page 3 TREESURVEY DB$ Cond. Place Contrib. Remarks 10.6, 17.2, 60 60 60 None. 19.8 15.2 60 60 60 None. West to No. 142. 5.9 60 30 30 Suppressed. 5.4, 5.4, 10 60 60 Fell into 146. Trunk damage. 12.2 Dead except for basal sprouts. 11.0, 18.0, 60 70 70 Leans. 4 main stems. 26.3, 26.8 2, 2, 2, 4, 30 50 50 Sprouts West of No. 146. 5. 6, 12 (Est.) 5.7 40 60 50 East of No. 146. Trunk damage. Page 3 Received: 4/21/99 10:26AM; 0603449848 -- BART SFO LINE & SYS; page u U006 04/2 . 1/99 WED 11:26 FAX fir 503449848 MAYNE TREE EXPERTS CO Nl� Cq im, kA it 'N A CA IL VIV, A o. A. Al C3 V\ `� V. , - - - I I I - io 2 m M ATTACHMENT C r6 e.11 Co 5 ITw 11 IPA Z o W LO x 0 U3 I tt 11 1 < Wo Zot tY z < w LLJ z < Eli r6 At. 11 IPA Z o W x 0 < 11 1 < OM<,j QOW MNM tY z < w LLJ z < it At. 11 N Z o W x 0 < 0 <0 < OM<,j QOW MNM tY z < w LLJ z < F C-0 .1N3V`4HOV1iV 33S 3NI-1 HDiVV4 7 f- 77--, 7l 7. t it L. :j�'. it: it IV tit luy' It C6 Lw- L' it VO, t W$ tvi t is it I J� 1� Ertl XW IY it < < m L-0 t \J� om< it t! to C3 :r < t -.100 0 z < tj ca < uj it, it J0 Al Z tq At Itt vi� 11 HOiVY4 1� Ertl XW IY < < m L-0 1N3VqHOViiV 33S HOiVY4 1� Ertl XW IY < < m 0 'rs om< O'W O�m 0-1 g C3 :r < -.100 0 z < < J0 Al Z tq 1� Ertl IY 11 < m 'rs < ct, 0 0 z J0 Al Z tq I z W� 4 y! 1i 4G, A a if! if 1i jffl % if I f i z W� m 4G, A a if! if 1i jffl % if I f i if z 0 2 4 A I ;1 - J. if Il i 'i if OMW iA•if ji'll, H, if z ii ;i If 1 1 11 LLJ if if tjili if C-0 iN3V4HOVAV 33S 3NI-1 HOiVN NOS'Hounn Zo— �45 i t i if z W� m 4G, A a if! % if I f i if z 0 2 A z - J. OMW ifii Q 0 JJ z LLJ tjili 4G, A a if! if I f i if 1iij !j - J. ilii T C-0 iN3V4HOVAV 33S 3NI-1 HOiVN ATTACHMENT D BART SFO Airport Extension BKF Project No. 940060.50 April 13, 1999 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT PARCEL D-3707-1 D Being all that real property situate in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California and described as follows: BEING a portion of Lot 1 and Lot 2 in Block 1, as said lot and block are shown on that certain map entitled "UNIT NO. 1 MILLSDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK", filed on August 16, 1954 in Book 39 of Maps at pages 49 and 50, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 1, said corner also being on the southwesterly line of a 25' wide planting strip as shown on said map, said line also being the northeasterly line of the lands described in the deed to Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, recorded on December 27, 1991 as Document No. 91171427, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County and being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; THENCE along the northwesterly line of said Lot 1, North 540 25' 23" East, 74.47 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of the lands described as Parcel No. 2 in the deed to Southern Pacific Company, recorded on February 16, 1956 in Book 2970 of Official Records at page 199, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County, said line also being the northeasterly line of a 50' wide drainage right of way as shown on said map, said point being on the arc of a non -tangent curve, concave southwesterly, having a radius of 511.04 feet, from which point a radial line bears South 490 27'38" West; THENCE leaving said northwesterly line of Lot 1, along said southwesterly and northeasterly lines, the following two (2) courses: 1) southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 020 43' 28", for an arc length of 24.30 feet; 2) South 370 48' 54" East, 25.82 feet; THENCE leaving last said lines, South 520 04' 07" West, 50.00 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of said 25' wide planting strip, said line also being the southwesterly line of said 50' wide drainage right of way; Page 1 of 3 THENCE along said northeasterly and southwesterly lines, the following two (2) courses: 1) South 370 48' 54" East, 95.26 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 2728.40 feet; 2) along said curve through a central angle of 170 10' 57", for an arc length of 818.22 feet; THENCE leaving last said lines, North 35° 01' 10" East, 50.00 feet to a point on the said northeasterly line of the 50' wide drainage right of way, said line also being the southwesterly line of said Parcel No. 2, said point being on the arc of a non -tangent curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 2678.40 feet, from which point a radial line bears North 350 00'08" East; THENCE along said northeasterly and southwesterly lines, southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 000 55' 02", for an arc length of 42.88 feet to the most easterly corner of said drainage right of way; THENCE leaving last said lines, along the southeasterly line of said drainage right of way, South 42° 00' 53" West, 50.47 feet to the most westerly corner of the lands described in the Accepting Grant Deed by the City of Burlingame, recorded on March 23, 1967 in Book 5284 of Official Records at page 548, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County, said point also being on the said northeasterly line of 25' wide planting strip, said point being on the arc of a non -tangent curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 2728.40 feet, from which point a radial line bears North 340 13' 53" East; THENCE leaving said southeasterly line, along the southwesterly line of said lands of the City of Burlingame and along said northeasterly line, southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 020 26' 03", for an arc length of 115.91 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of Parcel No. 12 as said parcel is described in the deed to Southern Pacific Company, recorded on February 16, 1956 in Book 2970 of Official Records at page 199, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County; THENCE leaving said southwesterly and northeasterly lines, along said northeasterly line of Parcel No. 12, the following two (2) courses: 1) North 690 12' 34" West, 72.73 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 372.21 feet; 2) along said curve through a central angle of 140 26' 12", for an arc length of 93.78 feet to the beginning of a compound curve, having a radius of 2753.40 feet, said curve being on the said northeasterly line of the lands described in the deed to Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, said line also being the said Page 2 of 3 southwesterly line of 25' wide planting strip; THENCE leaving said northeasterly line of Parcel No. 12, along last said northeasterly and southwesterly lines, the following two (2) courses: 1) along said compound cure, through a central angle of 160 57' 28", for an arc length of 814.92 feet 2) North 37° 48' 54" West, 148.38 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing an area of 31,036 square feet, more or less. NOTE: Bearings and distances described herein are based on the Califomia Coordinate System Zone 3, NAD 83. Multiply herein described distances by 1.0000706 to obtain ground level distances. Subject to special assessments, if any, restrictions, reservations, easements and other matters of record. Together with the underlying fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above described parcel in and to any adjoining streets, alleys, public ways or railroad rights-of-way. This description was prepared by me or under my direction in conformance with the Land Surveyor's Act. Davis R. Thresh, P.L.S. 6868 License expires: 09-30-2000 Dated: o-14-99 ND 1, . ZI PAM THRESH �a 'n. 'EXR 9/30/00 1..Ngo. 6868 _a J k.\sur9449400601appmapUegals\D3707•1 d.doc �F CRI Page 3 of 3 --------------- Lot name: D -3707-1D North: 2045630.960 East: 6015827.162 Line Course: N 54-25-23 E Length: 74.47 North: 2045674.287 East: 6015887.731 Curve Length: 24.30 Radius: 511.04 Delta: 2-43-28 Tangent: 12.15 Chord: 24.30 Course: S 39-10-38 E Course In: S 49-27-38 W Course Out: N 52-11-06 E RP North: 2045342.125 East: 6015499.362 End North: 2045655.451 East: 6015903.080 Line Course: S 37-48-54 E Length: 25.82 North: 2045635.053 East: 6015918.911 Line Course: S 52-04-07 W Length: 50.00 North: 2045604.318 East: 6015879.474 Line Course: S 37-48-54 E Length: 95.26 North: 2045529.062 East: 6015937.878 Curve Length: 818.22 Radius: 2728.40 Delta: 17-10-57 Tangent: 412.21 Chord: 815.17 Course: S 46-24-22 E Course In: N 52-11-06 E Course Out: S 35-00-09 W RP North: 2047201.882 East: 6018093.300 End North: 2044966.976 East: 6016528.256 Line Course: N 35-01-10 E Length: 50.00 North: 2045007.924 East: 6016556.949 Curve Length: 42.88 Radius: 2678.40 Delta: 0-55-02 Tangent: 21.44 Chord: 42.87 Course: S 55-27-23 E Course In: N 35-00-08 E Course Out: S 34-05-06 W RP North: 2047201.881 East: 6018093.301 End North: 2044983.611 East: 6016592.266 Line Course: S 42-00-53 W Length: 50.47 North: 2044946.114 East: 6016558.486 Curve Length: 115.91 Radius: 2728.40 Delta: 2-26-03 Tangent: 57.96 Chord: 115.90 Course: S 56-59-08 E Course In: N 34-13-53 E Course Out: S 31-47-50 W RP North: 2047201.880 East: 6018093.310 End North: 2044882.963 East: 6016655.676 Line Course: N 69-12-34 W Length: 72.73 North: 2044908.779 East: 6016587.682 Curve Length: 93.78 Radius: 372.21 Delta: 14-26-12 Tangent: 47.14 Chord: 93.54 Course: N 61-59-28 W Course In: N 20-47-26 E Course Out: S 35-13-38 W RP North: 2045256.752 East: 6016719.799 End North: 2044952.704 East: 6016505.101 Curve Length: 814.92 Radius: 2753.40 Delta: 16-57-28 Tangent: 410.47 Chord: 811.96 Course: N 46-17-38 W Course In: N 35-13-3B E Course Out: S 52-11-06 W RP North: 2047201.877 East: 6018093.318 End North: 2045513.729 East: 6015918.147 Line Course: N 37-48-54 W Length: 148.38 North: 2045630.948 East: 6015827.173 Perimeter: 2477.15 Area: 31,036 sq.ft. 0.71 acres Napcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.017 Course: S 43-19-07 E Error North: -0.0122 East: 0.0115 �' ision 1: 147,842.69 BART SFO Airport Extension BKF Project No. 940060.50 March 11, 1999 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT PARCEL D-3707-4 BEING a portion of Lot 1 and Lot 2 in Block 1, as said lot and block are shown on that certain map entitled "UNIT NO. 1 MILLSDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK", filed on August 16, 1954 in Book 39 of Maps at pages 49 and 50, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 1; THENCE along the northwesterly line of said Lot 1, North 540 25' 23" East, 25.02 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of a 50' wide drainage right of way as shown on said map; THENCE leaving said northwesterly line of Lot 1, along said southwesterly line, South 370 48'54" East, 52.15 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; THENCE leaving said southwesterly line, North 52° 04' 07" East, 50.00 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of said 50' wide drainage right of way; THENCE along said northeasterly line, the following two (2) courses: 1) South 370 48' 54" East, 95.36 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 2678.40 feet; 2) along said curve through a central angle of 170 10' 58", for an arc length of 803.24 feet; THENCE leaving said northeasterly line, South 35° 01' 10" West, 50.00 feet to a point on said southwesterly line of drainage right of way, said point being on the arc of a non - tangent curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 2728.40 feet, from which point a radial line bears North 350 00' 09" East; THENCE along said southwesterly line the following two (2) courses: 1) northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 17° 10' 57", for an arc length of 818.22 feet; Page 1 of 2 2) North 370 48'54" West, 95.26 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing an area of 45,299 square feet, more or less. NOTE: Bearings and distances described herein are based on the California Coordinate System Zone 3, NAD 83. Multiply herein described distances by 1.0000706 to obtain ground level distances. Subject to special assessments, if any, restrictions, reservations, easements and other matters of record. This description was prepared by me or under my direction in conformance with the Land Surveyor's Act. Davis R. Thresh, P.L.S. 6868 —" DAVISTIiRESH License expires: 09-30-2000 EXP 9/30/00 Dated: No. 6868 Q ¢" �3 " 9 � r Q' 9TFOF CA��F�� lc\Sur94\940060\appmaplegals\D3707-4.doc Page 2of2 Lot name: D-3707-4 North: 2045604.319 Line Course: N 52-04-07 E North: 2045635.055 Line Course: S 37-48-54 E North: 2045559.721 Curve Length: 803.24 Delta: 17-10-58 Chord: 800.24 Course In: N 52-11-06 E RP North: 2047201.885 End North: 2045007.928 Line Course: S 35-01-10 W North: 2044966.980 Curve Length: 818.22 Delta: 17-10-57 Chord: 815.17 Course In: N 35-00-09 E RP North: 2047201.886 End North: 2045529.066 Line Course: N 37-48-54 W North: 2045604.322 East: 6015879.482 Length: 50.00 East: 6015918.919 Length: 95.36 East: 6015977.385 Radius: 2678.40 Tangent: 404.66 Course: S 46-24-23 E Course Out: S 35-00-08 W East: 6018093.306 East: 6016556.954 Length: 50.00 East: 6016528.261 Radius: 2728.40 Tangent: 412.21 Course: N 46-24-22 W Course Out: S 52-11-06 W East: 6018093.305 East: 6015937.884 Length: 95.26 East: 6015879.479 Perimeter: 1912.09 Area: 45,299 sq -ft. 1.04 acres heck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) R, -or Closure: 0.003 Course: N 48-43-03 W Error North: 0.0022 East: -0.0025 Precision 1: 570,652.60 BART SFO Airport Extension BKF Project No. 940060.50 April 13, 1999 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT PARCEL D-3709-1 Being all that real property situate in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California and described as follows: BEING a portion of a 25 foot wide planting strip, as said planting strip is shown along the southwesterly portion of that certain map entitled "UNIT NO. 1 MILLSDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK", filed on August 16, 1954 in Book 39 of Maps at pages 49 and 50, and a portion of the planting strip and drainage right of way, as said planting strip and drainage right of way are shown along the southwesterly portion of that certain map entitled "UNIT NO. 5 MILLSDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK", filed on May 18, 1955 in Book 42 of Maps at pages 21, 22 and 23, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the northeasterly line of the lands described in the deed to Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, recorded on December 27, 1991 as Document No. 91171427, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County with the southerly line of the lands described as Parcel No. 12 in the deed to Southern Pacific Company, recorded on February 16, 1956 in Book 2970 of Official Records at page 199, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; THENCE along said southerly line of Parcel No. 12, South 690 12' 34" East, 143.75 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of said 25 foot wide planting strip, said line being concentric to and distant 25.00 feet northeasterly, from the said northeasterly line of the lands of Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, said point being on the arc of a non - tangent curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 2728.40 feet, from which point a radial line bears North 290 19' 19" East; THENCE along said northeasterly line of said planting strip and along said parallel line, the following two (2) courses: 1) southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 00° 21' 37", for an arc length of 17.16 feet; 2) South 61 ° 02' 18" East, 633.83 feet; THENCE leaving last said line, South 280 57' 42" West, 25.00 feet to a point on said northeasterly line of the lands of Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board; Page 1 of 2 THENCE along said northeasterly line the following two (2) courses: 1) North 61° 02' 18" West, 633.83 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 2753.40 feet; 2) along said curve through a central angle of 03° 19' 12", for an arc length of 159.55 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing an area of 18,140 square feet, more or less. NOTE: Bearings and distances described herein are based on the California Coordinate System Zone 3, NAD 83. Multiply herein described distances by 1.0000706 to obtain ground level distances. Subject to special assessments, if any, restrictions, reservations, easements and other matters of record. Together with the underlying fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above described parcel in and to any adjoining streets, alleys, public ways or railroad rights-of-way. This description was prepared by me or under my direction in conformance with the Land Surveyor's Act. Davis R. Thresh, P.L.S. 6868 / License expires: 09-30-2000 Dated: 4- (5— 9 , k.%Su94194006D\appmapVegal D3D3709-1.191 , DAVIS THRESH i EIR 9/30/00 No. 6868 v 4 to Page 2 of 2 Lot name: D-3709-1 North: 2044874.067 Line Course: S 69-12-34 E North: 2044823.043 Curve Length: 17.16 Delta: 0-21-37 Chord: 17.16 Course In: N 29-19-19 E RP North: 2047201.885 End North: 2044814.688 Line Course: S 61-02-18 E North: 2044507.772 Line Course: S 28-57-42 W North: 2044485.899 Line Course: N 61-02-18 W North: 2044792.814 Curve Length: 159.55 Delta: 3-19-12 Chord: 159.52 Course In: N 28-57-42 E RP North: 2047201.885 End North: 2044874.070 East: 6016622.773 Length: 143.75 East: 6016757.162 Radius: 2728.40 Tangent: 8.58 Course: S 60-51-29 E Course Out: S 28-57-42 W East: 6018093.305 East: 6016772.147 Length: 633.83 East: 6017326.713 Length: 25.00 East: 6017314.607 Length: 633.83 East: 6016760.041 Radius: 2753.40 Tangent: 79.79 Course: N 59-22-42 W Course Out: S 32-16-54 W East: 6018093.305 East: 6016622.764 Perimeter: 1613.12 Area: 18,140 sq.ft. 0.42 acres .heck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) or Closure: 0.010 Course: N 70-48-48 W Error North: 0.0032 East: -0.0091 Precision 1: 167,404.47 BART SFO Airport Extension BKF Project No. 940060.50 April 13, 1999 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT PARCEL D-3709-4 Being all that real property situate in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California and described as follows: BEING a portion of the 25 foot wide planting strip and drainage right of way, as said planting strip and drainage right of way are shown along the southwesterly portion of that certain map entitled "UNIT NO. 5 MILLSDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK", filed on May 18, 1955 in Book 42 of Maps at pages 21, 22 and 23, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the northeasterly line of a 25 foot wide planting strip as said planting strip is shown along the southwesterly portion of that certain map entitled UNIT NO. 1 MILLSDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK", filed on August 16, 1954 in Book 39 of Maps at pages 49 and 50, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California with the southerly line of the lands described as Parcel No. 12 in the deed to Southern Pacific Company, recorded on February 16, 1956 in Book 2970 of Official Records at page 199, in the Office of the Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California, said point being on the arc of a non -tangent cure, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 2728.40 feet, from which point a radial line bears North 280 57' 42" East; THENCE along said northeasterly line of said 25 foot wide planting strip (39 Maps 49- 50) and along the northeasterly line of said planting strip and drainage right of way (42 Maps 21-23), the following two (2) courses: 1) southeasterly along said cure through a central angle of 000 21' 37", for an arc length of 17.16 feet; 2) South 61° 02' 18" East, 633.83 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; THENCE continuing along said northeasterly line of planting strip and drainage right of way (42 Maps 21-23), South 61' 02' 18" East, 15.00 feet; THENCE leaving last said line, South 280 57' 42" West, 25.00 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of said planting strip and drainage right of way; Page 1 of 2 THENCE along said southwesterly line, North 610 02' 18" West, 15.00 feet; THENCE leaving last said line, North 280 57'42" East, 25.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Containing an area of 375 square feet, more or less. NOTE: Bearings and distances described herein are based on the California Coordinate System Zone 3, NAD 83. Multiply herein described distances by 1.0000706 to obtain ground level distances. Subject to special assessments, if any, restrictions, reservations, easements and other matters of record. This description was prepared by me or under my direction in conformance with the Land Surveyor's Act. Davis R. Thresh, P.L.S. 6868 License expires: 09-30-2000 Dated: ¢ �;— 39 .DAVIS THRESH `ten �c EXP.9/30/00 k:\Sur94\940060\appmapVegals\D3709-4.doc N—OF�A,,L Page 2 of 2 Lot name: D-3709-4 North: 2044507.768 East: 6017326.721 Line Course: S 61-02-18 E Length: 15.00 North: 2044500.505 East: 6017339.845 Line Course: S 28-57-42 W Length: 25.00 North: 2044478.631 East: 6017327.740 Line Course: N 61-02-18 W Length: 15.00 North: 2044485.894 East: 6017314.615 Line Course: N 28-57-42 E Length: 25.00 North: 2044507.768 East: 6017326.721 Perimeter: 80.00 Area: 375 sq.ft. 0.01 acres Napcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.000 Course: S 90-00-00 E Error North: 0.0000 East: 0.0000 Precision 1: 80,000,000.00 jz I zi I i ro t 3 Ill H�1Fi Sw am I R I I ----- Q m CL �I m� Q � I I I I II' 1 .cti�_ Q W r O� o r i 4 I I O---- CL Q a N I In i p o O z 1 < 7 O l2e Q 00 cd: cu 1 ooI i Q Q a 1 I Q 11 /y1 L1J I 1 O o I I I I v w I � 1!' 1 II c i U to N = u I • 1 rl, `I N °O° I Q 1 z° o O C.5 z ml I I Y s zW I 1 Ilwo W zzM C3 Q O I 111W 1' 1 O r z r Z a +i U \II �y N Z �D U 0 j N m O 1 001 OQ 3z UJ �❑� �p r\p = OI O wNc a Z Z O O o ty]i Z T 1 m zo Q [j Q 1 Z O!n oo O O rN-. } } z. 1 1 1 oU tG� H OM AVIW r �+, 444"' 1 r KZ Q I S} RWZ ta 3 W QZQw 1 O WZZ .O O O J 1i d N W 0 U w 1 m� I /J U a !n .Z.. W z H y Q 4i W COS I0 LO N I 30Q W� = I� r}J WW (L W Zq ¢W pgQQ r Z O Qi1�1 W (Y z W I a0 I aW InZ IilO H UO wOQW zy I lV I m SQO SW F- CL U < O O r li >- -i QQ Q r I I I N Z D oz)zr J J N .<(Lim I I I rl CL OWJO JU 3 o=X� Jx Ill H�-A L U r E l7 Q W ATTACHMENT E ATTACHMENT E City Trees Replaced TOTAL CITY TREES REPLACED 129 TOTAL CITY TREE REPLACEMENT PAYMENT $ 116,100 (At 2:1 Replacement Value of $900/Tree per Section 1.13) 04/29/99,11:31 AM Location of City Trees City Trees Identification No. per Landscape Easement Tree Survey Total City Trees Total No. Dead City Trees (ID No.) TOTAL CITY TREES REPLACED 1. Landscaping Easement on Texo Property as shown on Exhibit D a. Parcel D -3707-1D #1, 2, 2a, 2b, 3 to 77 #10, 23 74 60, 62 to 72, 74 to and 24. 77. b. Parcel D-3709-1 #79 to 116, 118 to 55 #117 54 120, 122 to 124, 126, 128 to 135, 137 and 138. 2. Landscaping Easement on Texo Property (for Project Temporary Construction Easement) a. Parcel D-3709-4 9148. 1 none 1 (Temp. Construction Easement) TOTAL CITY TREES REPLACED 129 TOTAL CITY TREE REPLACEMENT PAYMENT $ 116,100 (At 2:1 Replacement Value of $900/Tree per Section 1.13) 04/29/99,11:31 AM ATTACHMENT F WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 979 Broadway Avenue Millbrae, CA 94030-1912 Attention: Paul Lamoreaux San Mateo County Transit District 1250 San Carlos Avenue San Carlos, CA 94070-1306 Attention: Gerald T. Haugh ABOVE The undersigned grantee hereby declares this instrument to be exempt fiom Recording Fees (Govt. Code §27383) and Documentary Transfer Tax (Revenue and Taxation Code §11922). Documentary Transfer Tax: None - Exempt pursuant to Government Code §6103. W. Station: _ M.P. QUITCLAIM DEED For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby REMISE, RELEASE and FOREVER QUITCLAIM to the SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT, a public agency, all right, title and interest in and to that real property situate in the County of San Mateo, State of California, described herein as PARCEL 1 through PARCEL 3 inclusive, including but not limited to (a) all of grantor's interest, if any, in and to the improvements in said real property and (b) all appurtenances thereto; said parcel(s) being more particularly described as follows: PARCEL 1: SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT PARCEL #D- as described in attachment incorporated by reference hereto. PARCEL 2: SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT PARCEL # D- as described in attachment incorporated by reference hereto: PARCEL 1: SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT PARCEL #D- as described in attachment incorporated by reference hereto. 1:\plamore\deeds1 \template\quitclaim D- WZ Station: M.P. Page 2 of 2 DATED this day of .1999 Signed and delivered in the presence of m ATTACHMENT G City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Public Works Department Burlingame CA 94010 STREET AND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WORK LOCATION ADDRESS: OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP PHONE CONTRACTOR'S NAME I ADDRESS I CITY/STATE/ZIP I PHONE CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR LICENSE I BURLINGAME BUSINESS LICENSE NO. I U.S.A.(800-227-2600) REFERENCE NO. DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE ❑ CURB 696-7230 ❑ FIRE LINE 343-4545 ❑ STORM DRAIN 696-7260 ❑ CURB/GUTTER 696-7230 ❑ SEWER 696-7260 ❑ WATER SERVICE 696-7266 OR -7267 ❑ DRIVEWAY 696-7230 ❑ SIDEWALK 696-7230 ❑ OTHER 9L.. TRAFFIC LANE CLOSURES MUST BE APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PEAK HOUR RESTRICTION WILL APPLY TO MAJOR ROADWAYS. !lfl9Cl'RFR%9.PI7i;p'ARKs�EPT;:PBEFOREsC[TiT'ING1tO�OTSONER-2"'IN DIAlIWM-650/696.724$:. NO EXCAVATIONS OVER S' WITHOUT OSHA PERMIT. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE AND STATE LICENSE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK DONE BY A CONTRACTOR. I AGREE THAT CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT BURLINGAME CITY STANDARDS, WITH 24 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO THE CITY PRIOR TO START OF WORK AND �3HOURSU_R 4O EACHREQUIRED I�ISPECTfiiN. FINAL SURFACE REPLACEMENT SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 70 DAYS OF OPENING. REFUND OF DEPOSIT WILL BE MADE AFT( EST. START DATE CALL 650/696-7230 IF DEPOSIT REFUND NOT RECEIVED IN 30 DAYS. PERMIT INVALID 30 DAYS AFTER EST. COMPLETION DATE. SIGNATURE IOY/NERIAGENT) I TITLE PRDRNAME AS Y/RffTEN - PERMR FEE: 0 BOND IS REQUIRED O EXCAVATION IN UNIMPROVED STREET OR EASEMENT FUND 6 RECEIPT NO. REQUIRED RESTORATION APPROVED BY: AREA OF EXCAVATION: LENGTH X BONG AMOUNT: (REFUNDABLE) DATE: ❑ SONO N0. INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY.' D ENGINEERING DEPT. INSPECTED 0 STREET & SEWER DEPT. INSPECTED ITER DEPT. INSPECTED BY: REPRESENTING 0 BOND IS NOT REQUIRED • EXCAVATION IN IMPROVED STREET OR EASEMENT FUND S EST. COMPLETION DATE DATE ❑ INSPECTED By' DATE BOND REFUNDED BY AMOUNT DATE PERMIT NO. Rey. 438