Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1995.10.10CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 1995 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was called to order by Chairman Jacobs on Tuesday, October 10, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Deal, Galligan (7:35 p.m.), Jacobs, Mink and Wellford Absent: Commissioner Ellis and Key Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; City Attorney, Jerry Coleman; City Engineer, Frank Erbacher; and Fire Marshal, Keith Marshall MINUTES - The minutes of the September 26, 1995 Planning Commission meeting were amended to read "Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; City Engineer Attefey, Frank Erbacher; and Fire Marshal, Keith Marshall". The minutes were then approved as amended. AGENDA - The order of the agenda was amended to move Item #8, Parking Variance at 1215 California, zoned C-2, and Special Permit for parking area in the R-3 zone at 1109 Rhinette Avenue to the last item on the agenda. The order of the agenda was then approved. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments. ITEMS FOR STUDY 1. VARIANCES FOR THREE STORIES AND DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE AT 1480 ALVARADO AVENUE, ZONED R-1 (GARY SAYED, PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT. Requests: review and expand variance requirements for height, what is the hardship; what is FAR including the basement; show existing grade at face of the building; show new grade at 5' away from face of building; show slope of driveway; show slope of the lot from front to rear of house (corners) itself; do they intend to live in the house or is it a spec house; address argument altering natural grade then using that altered grade as the basis for an exception to the building code circumventing FAR requirement; comment on code exceptions for portions of structure outside declining height envelope; show SF of all floors. If all information is complete, item set for October 23, 1995. -1- Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 10, 1995 2. PARKING VARIANCE FOR NUMBER OF STALLS FOR A DANCE/GYMNASTICS/MUSIC ACADEMY FOR CHILDREN AT 701 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2 (W.I. BRITTON AND CO., PROPERTY OWNER AND RICHARD AND AMANDA BLUE, APPLICANTS). Requests: September 7, letter is unsigned, who is author; do they mean they will drop children at front door in traffic at signalized intersection; civil engineer's license stamp on plans shows that it expired in 1993, is that stamp still valid; applicant will use space differently than originally shown, submit plans showing desired layout; resubmit variance findings form with justification for 17 cars; expand on the for sale sign on the property and how that may affect this project; how is project addressing the potential noise impact of the use in the adjacent and nearby apartment buildings in the area zoned R-3. If all information is received, item set for October 23, 1995. ACTION ITEMS The applicants were advised that 5 of 7 Commission members were present. The rules of procedure for the Commission require a quorum (4) affirmative votes to pass a motion on action items. The Chair asked if any of tonight's applicants would like to delay their action until a full commission is seated. No applicants asked for a continuance. 3. SPECIAL PERMITS TO BUILD A TWO STORY DETACHED GARAGE WITH RECREATION ROOM AND TOILET AT 1520 RALSTON AVENUE, ZONED R-1 (KEVIN AND JENNIFER HELMIG, PROPERTY OWNERS AND APPLICANTS AND JAMES D. VALENTI, DESIGNER). Reference staff report, 10.10.95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration. Chm. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Jim Valenti, the designer and Kevin Helmet, property owner, 1520 Ralston Avenue, were present to address the commission.They noted they would be willing to lower the ceiling height in the garage to lower the plate and roof ridge 1 foot. The space in the rear near the pool has limited deck area because of the lip on the pool, however there is enough room within the house to remodel without changing the footprint of the house. There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Galligan noted the height of the accessory structure next door does not qualify as findings for this application. Commissioners asked if they considered a 2 car garage since present dimension is almost there, applicant noted could widen but would affect useable deck area next to pool which is minimal now; discussed fact that the parking place and storage area on grade in the garage are divided by a wall which will make it difficult to park a car in the narrower portion of the garage and insure that it will be used for workshop or storage not parking; discussed moving garage forward since lot is deep and rear 30 % almost 50% applicant wanted to off set mass of building next door; when finish garage will begin on house, dry rot is superficial applicant contractor and intends to expand porch, fix shingles and convert bedroom at rear to master bedroom with bath all within existing footprint of the house. He then moved denial of this project without prejudice noting; the garage should be within the -2- Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 10, 1995 permitted height (1 story); if 1' were added there would be a legitimate 2 car garage to support this property for the long term, the recreation room could be extended at the end of the garage structure and the pool equipment could be incorporated into the garage structure thereby making only 1 structure and reducing noise exposure for the neighbors; if one story windows would have much less impact on privacy. The applicant was asked to come back to the commission with revised plans. Motion was seconded by C. Deal and passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Ellis and Key absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. C. Deal noted a request for this many special permits indicates a project probably goes beyond the intentions of the zoning code. 4. HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT TO EXPAND A CHURCH AT 2828 TROUSDALE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 (NORTH BURLINGAME CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, PROPERTY OWNER AND PAUL K. YAMAGUCHI, APPLICANTI. Reference staff report, 10.10.95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration. Two letters in opposition, only referring to on street parking impacts of the use were read into the record. Chin. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Edgar Rodrigues, the engineer for the project, 15190 Cooper, San Jose, explained the project noting the purpose of the project is to enhance exterior, do seismic upgrade and make the building ADA accessible. Mr. Grewal, next door neighbor at 2846 Trousdale Drive, told the commission he has no problem with enclosing the patio, it is the impact on the view from his rear bedroom caused by the pitched roof that he is resisting. Mr. Rodrigues explained the mock up shows the roof will have minimal impact on the view, it is at a 3:12 pitch to keep it as low as possible. Additionally, the present flat roof leaks and they are hoping to address that problem by pitching the roof enough to have proper drainage, also to allow mechanical duct work for central air conditioning and heat in the attic. A number of members of the congregation were present to show support. There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Galligan commented that this application to extend the structure one foot toward the side and raise the roof 3'-8" at the maximum and less in most places seems benign. There would be some view impact to the house next door but the effect is partial and on a bedroom at the rear not a living room; there is a structural problem associated with the present roof of the church which needs to be addressed and they have done this by being sensitive to the neighbor and keeping the roof as low as possible. He then moved approval of this Hillside Area Construction Permit and Special Permit application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped August 24, 1995, sheets A-1, A-4, A-5 and sheets A-2 and A-3 date stamped October 2, 1995; 2) that the conditions stated in the Fire Marshal's August 28, 1995 and Chief building Inspector's August 28, 1995 memos shall be met; 3) that as built the three new roof ridges added over the patio area shall not exceed elevation 22'-8" (face rear of lot), 23'-2" (face west side of lot), and 23'-8' (face Trousdale frontage) and that after framing, before attaching the roof, the roof ridge lines shall be surveyed by a licensed Engineer or surveyor to confirm -3- Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 10, 1995 the framed heights, and the surveyed heights approved by the City Engineer before the roof shall be attached; 4) that each congregation shall be reminded quarterly about the priorities in parking: church lot, on -street in front of the church, Sebastian where there are no houses fronting on the street; and 5) that all new construction shall conform to all the requirements of the Uniform Fire and Uniform Building Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame. Motion was seconded by C. Mink and passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Ellis and Key absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. 5. FENCE EXCEPTION FOR HEIGHT OF FENCE IN THE FRONT SETBACK AT 2836 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1, (ROLANDO PASQUALE, PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT). Reference staff report, 10.10.95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration. CE asked that a correction be made on the city drawing. There should be 6' clear to the edge of the pillar for sight distance. Chm. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Mr. Pasquale, 2836 Hillside was present to answer the commissions questions. He noted the reason for the fence was to keep children in, because of corner lot on Hillside exposed on three sides. There were questions about the size of the pillars and it was explained that they need to be that large to support the 24' wide gate also height because of slope on lot and need level gate.. The wide gate opening is needed because the driveway splits to the left to the front door and to the right to the garage. this division also drives the placement of the pillars, one being in the city right-of-way. This project will not block and views and is safe from an engineering point of view. Fence and gate will be designed to match wrought iron on house. There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners commented that the fence will look large because it is so exposed; too massive, could be reduced by being inset from edge of paving. C. Mink noted the exceptional circumstance is the current width of the driveway needed because of the way it serves the front of the house and garage, there is no public hazard and the neighboring properties will not be materially damaged. He then moved approval of this Fence Exception application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1) that the fence and gate shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped September 7, 1995 (site plan and fence sections) and in conformance with the Public Works Department drawings date stamped September 27, 1995 (proposed fence installation site plan and detail), with the pillars not to exceed 7'-0" and 9'-5" in height and the gate one foot lower (6'-0" to 8'-5") as measured from the highest adjacent grade; 2) that within 90 days, an application for an encroachment permit for one pillar and portions of the gate and fence located in the public right-of-way shall be submitted for City action, no construction shall commence until an encroachment permit has been approved; 3) that the conditions of the City Engineer's September 11 and 29, 1995 memo and the Chief Building Inspector's September 11, 1995 memo shall be met; 4) that application shall be made to the Building Department for issuance of a building permit for construction of the pillars, gate and fence before installation shall commence; -4- Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 10, 1995 and 5) that the project shall meet all Uniform Building and Uniform fire Code requirements as amended by the City of Burlingame. Motion was seconded by C. Galligan and passed on a 4-1-2 (C. Deal dissenting and Cers. Ellis and Key absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. 6. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR CLASSES INCIDENTAL TO RETAIL USE AT 1354 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A (THOMAS AND DIANE AYOOB, PROPERTY OWNERS AND CAROL HORN-DAVIS OF GYMBOREE CORPORATION, APPLICANT). Reference staff report, 10.10.95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. A letter in favor of the project was read into the record. Chm. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Carol Horn -Davis, Nancy Pido, President, Bob Campbell, Director of Operations, representing Gymboree Corporation, 700 Airport Boulevard. Nancy Pido defined the purpose of the Corporation and described the reasons Gymboree choose to incorporate the play classes and retail sales for the first time at this site (described it is near their Corporate offices in Burlingame). Mr. Campbell asked that the times in condition #2 be changed from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., from 8:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. and that Sunday classes be allowed from 8:00 a. m. to 9:00 p.m. since there is no issue with parking on Sunday and it would assist them in meeting their times of peak demand. The actual scheduling will be dependent on response to marketing. He also asked that the limitation of one parent per child participant be eliminated from the conditions, since two parents sometimes attend with their child, usually at evening classes. In response to commissioners questions the applicant discussed a clarification of program between 45 minutes and 1 hour 15 minute activities, the applicant noted that all classes would be scheduled within the stated time blocks, the specialized classes and activities would more likely be on the weekends, longer classes will be with older children and in the afternoon; Burlingame is the first site where they are trying to combine retail and play classes; will not keep St. Paul's gymboree program if this site is approved. There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners discussion included high quality program but serious parking problem at this location better in a strip mall like Plaza; need 15 minutes between classes because of location; use of rear door of this site for children and parents very dangerous, traffic oblivious to pedestrians; commission has an obligation to building owners and tenants to insure proper mix of uses so parking demand balanced; people manage when parking short, customers will decide it is worth it; retail will benefit from play program and will bring people downtown; traffic volume for a video store is greater; past experience trying to legislate class times in a similar use show not work. C. Jacobs then moved denial of this special permit application due to the anticipated parking impact noting the area cannot support this use and impact. Motion was seconded by C. Deal and passed on a 4-1-2 (C. Galligan dissenting and Cers. Ellis and Key absent) roll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised. W Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 10, 1995 7. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE PREVIOUS PERMITS FOR A WOMEN'S FITNESS CENTER AT 1208 DONNELLY AVENUE, ZONED C-1 SUBAREA B-1 (DAY FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP, PROPERTY OWNER AND RANDALL DELUE, APPLICANT). (CONTINUED TO MONDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING). 9. SPECIAL PERMITS TO ALLOW A CANNING OPERATION AND OUTDOOR STORAGE AT 1333 MARSTEN ROAD, ZONED M-1 (STEVE REEDY AND GROVE HOOVER, PROPERTY OWNERS AND STEVE REEDY, APPLICANT). Reference staff report, 10.10.95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments. Six conditions were suggested for consideration. Chm. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Steve Reedy, 3103 Hillside Drive explained his application to the commission stating he does not agree with the city attorney's definition of canning, his operation is essentially a bottling process. He combines pre -prepared items and puts them in bottles. He noted there is no waste and no odors just aromas; he puts nothing down the drain; he has a problem neighbor annoyed because of a car or employee parking on Rollins Road; he improved the site removed the old tin fence and replaced it with a picket fence and power gate, increased security. There are 6-7 people in the manufacturing plant, actually there are 12-14 employees on-site. Mr. Michaels, 1327-29 Rollins Road spoke in support of the application, indicating there is no parking problem on Marsten Road and the property upgrade will eliminate an eyesore. Tony Leopardo, 1314 Rollins Road spoke in opposition. He complained about parking on Rollins, employees have not parked on site for 21h years, very frequent deliveries and the -off and -on loading of trucks on the city streets and in the driveway and an excess of debris. The site is so crowded that BFI must pickup on the street. there is no space to park on site, some of the 33 spaces are on Michael's rentals site. Mr. Reedy countered that the so called debris is recycle bins from BFI and that there are no complaints from any other neighbor. He claims to enforce the employee parking on-site as best he can. There is no customer parking the activity is only wholesale sales. Neighbor commented that he would like applicant to develop a track record of compliance before a permit is issued. There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission asked that the applicant be aware that the spaces designated for parking are not for storage or personal use, i.e., storage of boat trailers or inoperable employee cars. CA responded to a question from the commission regarding conditions of approval, the result if approved, would be that the city will act on complaints and if they are not in compliance with their conditions the permit can be revoked. C. Deal then moved approval of this special permit application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions: 1) that the uses shall be carried out within the building as shown on the Plans date stamped August 23, 1995, Sheet 1 and Sheet 2; 2) that 14 parking spaces, as shown on the amended plan dated September 20, 1995, shall be labeled for the exclusive use of S&D Foods, Inc., and its owners or affiliates and that the labeling shall be completed and inspected within 30 days after this action 1.1 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 10, 1995 becomes final; 3) that the on-site parking shall include two disabled accessible parking spaces (one van) and shall be accessible at all times by all employees and all employees shall use the on-site parking and shall not park their vehicles ont he street along Rollins Road or Marsten Road; 4) that the outdoor storage areas shall be enclosed by an 8'-0" high opaque fence and kept clean of waste and debris produced by the canning process and that all materials for recycling, shall be kept contained and clean to prevent the attraction of rodents and other vermin and shall be maintained in an orderly fashion and in good repair by the property owner and/or tenant and that the enclosures shall be installed within 30 days after this action becomes final; 5) that the conditions set forth in the Associate Engineer's memo dated August 28, 1995 shall be met; and 6) that the number of employees of S & D Foods, Inc. and its owners or affiliates on site at any one time shall not exceed 14; any increase in the number of employees or operations which exceed the capacity of the site shall require this use permit to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Motion was seconded by C. Mink and passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Ellis and Key absent) voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. 10. TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR 150 ANZA BOULEVARD, ZONED C-4 (SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT HOMETEL LTD., PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT). (CONTINUED TO MONDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING). 8. PARKING VARIANCE AT 1215 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2, AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PARKING AREA IN THE R-3 ZONE AT 1109 RHINETTE AVENUE (DON SABATINI, PROPERTY OWNER AND ARDIS JEROME OF GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, APPLICANT). C. Galligan stated that he must abstain from the vote and the pubic hearing because of his involvement with the property owner, Mr. Sabatini. He left the room. Reference staff report, 10.10.95, with attachments. CP Monroe discussed the request, reviewed criteria, Planning Department comments. A total of 12 conditions (7 conditions for 1215 California and 5 conditions for 1109 Rhinette) were suggested for consideration. Commission asked about the donations trailer located on the Rhinette lot and about whether the area behind the wall being used by the restaurant on Broadway was a part of this site, it is now believed to be on an easement. Chm. Jacobs opened the public hearing. Norm Book, representing Mr. Sabatini, and Ardis Jerome, representing Goodwill, 1500 Mission Street, San Francisco, were present to describe the application to the commission. Mr. Book explained the previous use was auto repair, tried 6 months to find a tenant and had opportunities but felt retail was a better use despite having to invest in the property to attract a retail tenant; asking for an 11 space parking variance but providing mitigation; the properties are in common ownership, they understand the restriction to keep them together, 2 oil/gas tanks have been removed and there is no remediation or monitoring required; if issue denied ask for denial without prejudice so can respond to concerns. -7- Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 10, 1995 Ms. Jerome explained they expect to be a long term tenant, employee training and job placement are important aspects of their business. There will be 10 employees (3 part time). The majority of trainees and employees are transitional, work for minimum wage and are encouraged to use mass transit. They intend to improve this retail site, store contains new and used merchandise. The donation trailer is attended when open. They use one bobtail a day to deliver merchandise, can deliver between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. or before 7:00 a.m.; donation trailer replaced 1 to 2 times a month. Trucks can come off California or by way of Broadway, Laguna, Rhinette as shown in the packet. Laguna and Rhinette are residential streets; goodwill is not tied to any specific time for delivery, city can direct; truck access to site is limited because of fence and gate, need wider driveway, 30', no landscaping is shown, willing to plant vines on fences and trees. Easement at rear is a utility easement, half used by each property. John Cimino, Jr. 1060 Carolyn Avenue, #101, representing Burlingame Villa at 1117 Rhinette, questioned the maneuverability on Rhinette, which is only 26' wide and not 36' as shown, and expressed concern about utility poles at curb which would limit driveway size and the ability to maneuver. Laguna is a residential street only 26' wide; the Rhinette lot is not a parking lot but an outdoor staging area with lots of activity and no landscaping; if city parking lot remains, the parking will be good, if it doesn't the Rhinette lot is inadequate. CE noted the 26' width of the street would inhibit the ability of a 28' trailer's maneuverability and turning radius. The applicant noted that they could use smaller trucks; they need to unload on-site. The map labeled "Lincoln" should read "Laguna". The applicant felt they could work with the CE for a method to eliminate traffic problems. Mr. Book clarified Mr. Sabatini may not own that property. It was noted that they expected a maximum of 50 people on site at one time. Mr. Book then asked the commission, if they move to deny, to consider denying without prejudice. There were no other comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission questioned ingress, egress, the necessary width of the street to maneuver large trucks and the tremendous amount of activity at that corner. Landscaping/trees next to city lot and ivy on the residential fence at the west were suggested as a good opportunity to enhance the property, the applicant agreed. C. Deal then moved approval of this special permit and parking variance application with the mitigation of providing the 11 parking spaces on Rhinette and providing landscaping and trees along the fence by the city parking lot and vegetative screening on the fence to the west by residential property and the wall by the restaurant, by resolution, with the following added and amended conditions: (parking variance conditions 1215 California Drive) 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped September 15, 1995 with 6,290 SF retail sales area, 1220 SF office including disabled accessible restrooms, 330 SF training room or office, and 1,344 SF of storage/stock room; 2) that the conditions of the Chief Building Inspector's August 28, 1995, memo as they apply to the structure on the site at 1215 California Drive shall be met and that the hours of access for deliveries and pickups and the routes of deliveries and pick ups shall be determined by the city engineer and may be altered by him as traffic congestion and residential compatibility demands change; 3) that the training room facilities shall only be used for the instruction of employees on the 1215 California site; 4) that on site at one time there shall be a maximum of 9 employees, including all on site managers and one employee assigned to operate the 5:11 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 10, 1995 donations trailer and related activities, and that the store shall be open between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. daily; 5) that all employees driving to work shall park in the parking provided by this business at 1109 Rhinette Avenue; 6) that this parking variance for 11 spaces shall be valid so long as the properties at 1215 California Drive and 1109 Rhinette Avenue remain in the same ownership; the square footage of uses within the structure at 1215 California remain the same as in condition 1; and 11 parking places are provided to city code dimension standards on the property known as 1109 Rhinette Avenue in safe, useable condition for the employees and customers for the retail use at 1215 California Drive; and 7) that all improvements and construction shall be built in conformance with the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame; and (special permit conditions 1109 Rhinette Avenue) 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted the Planning Department and date stamped September 15, 1995 the portion showing the 50' x 130' lot known as 1109 Rhinette Avenue showing 11 parking spaces designed to city code standards and an area at the rear for storing the donations trailer; 2) that the conditions of the Chief Building Inspector's August 18, 1995, memo as they apply to the parking and disabled accessible access provided on 1109 Rhinette Avenue; 3) that this conditional use permit to use the lot at 1109 Rhinette Avenue as a parking area to support the retail activity at 1215 California Drive shall be valid so long as the properties at 1109 Rhinette Avenue and 1215 California Drive remain in the same ownership; the use of 1109 Rhinette Avenue shall remain in parking with a minimum of 11 spaces; and that the uses within the structure at 1215 California Drive remain 6,290 SF retail, 1,220 SF office, 330 SF training room/office, 1,344 SF storage/stock room; 4) that irrigated landscaping be provided along the chain link fence, a row of trees on the east side by the city parking lot, a screening vine on the west side separating the parking lot from the residential use, and a vegetative screen next to the wall by the restaurant; 5) that all improvements and construction for the parking area and disabled accessibility shall be built in conformance with the requirements of the adopted Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame; and 6) that the city engineer shall determine the timing and size of truck deliveries consistent with the traffic congestion in the area. Motion was seconded by C. Mink and failed on a 3-1-2 (C. Jacobs dissenting and Cers. Ellis and Key absent) roll call vote. Norm Book, representing the property owner and applicant asked that the commission reconsider and deny this project without prejudice. C. Deal then made a motion that the commission reconsider their vote. The motion was seconded by C. Mink and failed on a 3-1-2 (C. Jacobs dissenting and Cers. Ellis and Key absent) roll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised. C. Jacobs described the traffic impact on Laguna and indicated that this is too much activity for the corner of Broadway and California. She felt this to be the wrong location. for this use. PLANNER REPORTS In Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 10, 1995 - CP reviewed City Council regular meeting of October 2, 1995. - Discussion of the Draft M-1 District Regulations Purpose Statement was postponed to the October 23, 1995 Planning Commission Meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:20 p.m. MINUTES 10.10 -10- Respectfully submitted, Chuck Mink, Secretary