Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1991.08.26CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1991 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was called to order by Vice Chairman Mink on Monday, August 26, 1991 at 7:33 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Deal, Ellis, Galligan, Graham, Jacobs, Mink Absent: Kelly Staff Present: Sheri Saisi, Zoning Technician; Leah Dreger, Zoning Technician; Jerry Coleman, City Attorney; Frank Erbacher, City Engineer; Keith Marshall, Fire Marshal MINUTES - The minutes of the August 12, 1991 meeting were unanimously approved with the following addition to the motion for denial of Item 12, page 3, Variances - 1003 Chula Vista Avenue: "Application was denied on a 2-2 roll call vote, Cers Deal and Galligan dissenting . . . " AGENDA - Order of the agenda approved. ITEMS FOR STUDY 1. HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND CREEK ENCLOSURE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE BEDROOM, TWO STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 2652 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 Requests: poles indicating height of proposed structure; since the house has been moved 14' to the northeast, how will it affect those houses affected by the previous application; drawings showing a comparison with the previous Ling application; indication on plans where story poles are located using a numbering system; height of proposed chimneys, indicate on plans where chimneys are in relation to the ridge/story line. Item set for public hearing September 9, 1991. 2. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO BE USED AS A BATH HOUSE AT 2614 SUMMIT DRIVE, ZONED R-1 Requests: copy of settlement agreement between the two neighbors; copy of original drawings (8-1/2" x 1111) of the permit granted in December, 1982. Item set for public hearing September 9, 1991. Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 August 26, 1991 3. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR AN ANTIQUE STORE IN THE ADELINE CENTER AT 1500-A ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED C-1 Requests: number of regular and handicap parking spaces in the existing parking lot; how often are deliveries made, by what means and where; have applicants asked for signage, are they aware there is a master signage program for this site. Item set for public hearing September 9, 1991. 4. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A FURNITURE, COLLECTIBLES AND ANTIQUE SHOP IN THE ADELINE CENTER AT 1500 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED C-1 Requests: number of regular and handicap parking spaces in the existing parking lot; how often are deliveries made, by what means and where; have applicants asked for signage, are they aware there is a master signage program for this site. Item set for public hearing September 9, 1991. 5. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A RETAIL DRY CLEANING PICK UP AND DROP OFF (NO CLEANING ON SITE) SERVICE AT 1152 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED C-1 SUB AREA A Requests: clarify maximum number of employees; are alterations a part of this application; percentage of empty spaces in nearby public parking lots. Item set for public hearing September 9, 1991. 6. FENCE EXCEPTION - 1710 GILBRETH ROAD, ZONED M-1 Requests: minutes of the August 25, 1986 Planning Commission approval of a fence exception for this site. Item set for public hearing September 9, 1991. ITEMS FOR ACTION 7. PARKING VARIANCE FOR TWO COVERED SPACES FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION AT 1700 SHERMAN AVENUE, ZONED R-1 Reference staff report, 8/26/91, with attachments. ZT Saisi reviewed details of the request, staff review, applicant's letter, required findings. Two conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing. CE confirmed the normal driveway width for a two car garage is 161. Chm. Mink opened the public hearing. Brian Woodell, applicant and property owner, was present. His comments: they have resided here for the past seven years, were raised in Burlingame and want to make their home here, their growing family necessitates an addition to the house; the smallest of the five bedrooms will be used as an office for his wife's home occupation for which she has a home occupation permit; they have a two car garage and sufficient driveway to park two more cars, this has been adequate for the past seven years, even with added Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 August 26, 1991 storage on the back wall of the garage parking of two vehicles has never been a problem; it is an aesthetically pleasing garage which blends with the existing house and will blend with the proposed addition, the garage enhances their home and the neighborhood, to add 1'-9" to the garage length would be extremely expensive and would hurt its present curbside appeal, a total rebuild would be prohibitive financially. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Deal stated he would abstain from discussion and the vote. Commission/staff discussed how alternatives would or would not affect parking regulations. C. Graham found this proposal to be an attractive addition; it would not be detrimental to the neighborhood; it is unusual because there is a driveway area which goes across two different setbacks, the side setback and rear setback; there is no way the garage can be lengthened realistically. C. Graham moved for approval of the parking variance with the following conditions: (1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped August 9, 1991, Sheets 1 through 3 and Sheet 6; and (2) that the project shall meet all Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Code requirements as amended by the City of Burlingame. Motion was seconded by C. Galligan. In comment on the motion C. Jacobs found the placement of the house is an exceptional circumstance. Motion was approved on a 5-0-1 roll call vote, C. Deal abstaining, C. Kelly absent. Appeal procedures were advised. 8. REAR YARD AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES FOR A SINGLE STORY ADDITION Al 1105 HAMILTON LANE, ZONED R-1 Reference staff report, 8/26/91, with attachments. ZT Dreger reviewed details of the request, staff review, applicant's letter, required findings. Two conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing. A Commissioner pointed out the rear setback is actually 8.41, not 91, and requested the variance application be changed to reflect this. Chm. Mink opened the public hearing. Harvey Widlund, representing the property owner, Chuck Strohmaier, was present. He stated they had tried other ways to avoid the variance request but they didn't work; because of the handicapped son the second bathroom will be for handicapped; he had a petition in support signed by 20 neighbors including the five adjacent neighbors. John Levi, 1116 Hamilton Lane, spoke in support: he had seen the plans, the addition does not infringe on any of the neighboring properties, he had no 'objection to the Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 August 26, 1991 project. There were no further audience comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Jacobs found this proposal would not be detrimental to the neighborhood, there are exceptional circumstances in the unusual shape of the lot. C. Jacobs moved for approval of the side and rear yard setback variances with the following conditions: (1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped August 19, 1991, Sheet 1 and Sheet 2; and (2) that the project shall meet all Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Code requirements as amended by the City of Burlingame. Motion was seconded by Cers Graham and Ellis and approved 6-0 on roll call vote, C. Kelly absent. Appeal procedures were advised. 9. SPECIAL PERMITS FOR INDOOR AND OUTDOOR AUTO STORAGE AND VARIANCES FOR PARKING AND SIDE SETBACKS FOR PARCEL APN 025-272-160 WITH A TEMPORARY ADDRESS OF 970 DAVID ROAD, ZONED M-1 (CONTINUED FROM 8/12/91) Reference staff report, 8/26/91, with attachments. ZT Saisi reviewed details of the request, parcel map creating this long and narrow parcel, staff review, applicant's letter, study meeting questions, required findings. Seven conditions were suggested for consideration at the public hearing. She advised a landscape variance was no longer required. Responding to a question, staff advised a chain link fence would be acceptable under Condition J3. Chm. Mink opened the public hearing. Stephen Segale, applicant, was present. He noted this is an unusual lot, long and narrow, he will keep three to four cars there, not in and out every day, he just needs the storage area; he is a carpenter working normal daytime hours; no auto restoration work will be done on site. There were no audience comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Deal stated he would abstain from discussion and voting. Commission discussion/comment: cannot vote for this project, applicant may use it for storage now but in the future any use will need variances, it doesn't have on-site parking, it is ridiculous to put 370 SF of landscaping in the back of a building which has a roll -up door, this proposal is not in the best interest of that area nor is a building on this site. Agree with these comments; why two handicap restrooms if there is no commercial activity proposed for the site; it is difficult to believe applicant would not use this good storage facility for some tinkering on his cars, cars always require something. Further comment: agree with the previous comments but am compelled to come to the opposite conclusion, who created this situation, the real issue at this point is what are the options; the city permitted this division and now there is a property owner who wants to develop his Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 August 26, 1991 site, this is as simple a project and about the only type of project this property could support; if the city doesn't feel the property should support any project then the city should step in, take it over and relieve the property owner of the burden; if the city is not prepared to do this it should look at the merits of the proposal, do not think there is anything else that can be put on this property from a commercial standpoint. Another comment: this -parcel was split off to complement and add on to others, the other property owners do not want this parcel at least at this time; if property owner and applicant want to build on an M-1 lot of these dimensions they should meet code, an architect can always find a way to do so. C. Jacobs moved for denial of the special permits and variances for this project with the statement this is not what the parcel was divided for, Commission should look toward the future and think in terms of the whole area. Motion was seconded by C. Graham who commented that Commission has not heard from the property owner and what he has done to attempt to lease this space. Comment on the motion: it is unfortunate that this piece of property exists, the type of use proposed is perhaps one of the few uses which could go in there; have a problem with the design, it could be better and less objectionable, there could be more landscaping in front; handicap restrooms are probably a building code requirement; upholding the conditions suggested by staff is going to be difficult. Motion to deny was approved on a 4-1-1 roll call vote, C. Galligan voting no, C. Deal abstaining, C. Kelly absent. Appeal procedures were advised. 10. SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT TO EXPAND REAL ESTATE OFFICES AT 400 PRIMROSE ROAD, ZONED C-1. SUB AREA B1 Item continued to the meeting of September 9, 1991. FROM THE FLOOR Marti Knight, 455 Chatham Road, referred to the vacant parcel at the corner of Adeline Drive and E1 Camino Real and the parcel considered this evening at 970 David Road (temporary address), inquiring about the possibility of the city taking over privately owned property for parking. The Chair advised her the official position of the city would have to be requested from City Council. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Copy of City Attorney's August 15, 1991 letter to Mithoo Benner, Donnelly Square Fitness Center, regarding noise complaints. Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes PLANNER REPORTS There were no City Planner reports. of August 19, 1991 was canceled. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:44 P.M. Page 6 August 26, 1991 City Council regular meeting Respectfully submitted, Jerry L. Deal Secretary