Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1980.06.09CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 9, 1980 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was called to order by Chairman Sine on Monday, June 9, 1980 at 7:37 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Cistulli, Francard, Harvey, Jacobs, Mink, Sine, Taylor Absent: None Staff Present: City Planner John R. Yost; Director of Public Works Ralph E. Kirkup; City Attorney Jerome F. Coleman MINUTES - Upon motion of C. Jacobs, second C. Cistulli, the minutes of the May 28, 1980 meeting were approved and adopted. - AGENDA - Upon motion of C. Jacobs, second C. Cistulli, the order of the agenda was approved, with the addition of a report by C. Jacobs on attendance at a housing conference. APPLICATIONS FOR ACTION 1. VARIANCE FROM CODE SEC. 25.28.060 TO CREATE A 3,295 SF LOT (WITH A 41' FRONTAGE ON EDGEHILL DRIVE) AT THE BACK OF 841 FAIRFIELD ROAD, BY STEPHEN C. KIRCHER CP Yost reviewed this application to create a new lot at the back of the existing single family home at 841 Fairfield Road; the two new lots would be substandard. Reference staff report dated 6/6/80; Project Application & CEQA Assessment accepted by staff 6/2/80; letter from Steve Kircher received May 29, 1980; aerial photograph of the site; copies of 1906 subdivision map, 1911 subdivision map and the 1980 Assessor's map. CP noted issues raised by the application and staff's belief there were several problems with the proposed lot split. It was determined all property owners within 300 feet of the site had been notified of this hearing and that the applicant had been advised of the four legal requirements for variance approval. Discussion included: contiguous lots; other lots in the area; and the 1906 and 1911 subdivisions. Stephen Kircher, the applicant, was present. He presented a petition and two letters from neighbors in favor of the proposal. Addressing the four variance requirements, he noted he had purchased this property with the intent of splitting it; that there are several types of land use in his neighborhood; that the neighbors had indicated they would prefer an additional R-1 single family home. Mr. Kircher felt he should be allowed to maximize the use of his property to the fullest extent and noted the sub- standard lot depth would not be visible from the street; that he was proposing a lot depth equal to his neighbor at 1429 Edgehill Drive; that the house to be put on the new lot would have a footprint of less than 1300 SF (the maximum allowed by code); that a new house on this lot would be an improvement to the neighborhood and that his proposal would not infringe on anyone's property rights. It was determined the applicant had been in his present home for two years. Page 2 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes June 9, 1980 Chm. Sine opened the public hearing. There were no comments and the hearing was closed. Secy. Harvey read the following in support of the application: June 9, 1980 petition signed by 12 neighbors; June 9, 1980 letter from Douglas J. Spaulding, 1412 Edgehill Drive and June 9, 1980 letter from James J. Hamrock, 852 Fairfield Road. June 4, 1980 letter in opposition from Virginia J. Hvid, 845 Paloma Avenue was also read. There was general consensus that the testimony presented did not meet the requirements of the code for granting a variance. There was a favorable opinion expressed about creating additional lots, but concern about substandard lots; inadequate street frontage and less than minimum lot size which do not meet the purpose of the General Plan. C. Taylor moved that this application be denied. Second C. Mink; application denied on a 7-0 roll call vote. Appeal procedures were advised. 2. FINAL PARCEL MAP TO COMBINE PORTIONS OF LOTS 28 AND 29, BLOCK 6, EASTON ADDITION NO. 1; PROPERTY AT 1056 EL CAMINO REAL; FOR JOSEPH W. BRONZINI DPW Kirkup advised this parcel map complies with the conditions of the tentative map, and recommended approval, with abandonment of the public utilities easement at the rear of the lot. Chm. Sine opened the public hearing. There were no comments and the hearing was closed. C. Jacobs moved for approval and recommendation to City Council of this final parcel map with the condition that the public utilities easement at the rear of the lot be vacated. Second C. Cistulli and approved 7-0 on roll call vote. 3• FINAL PARCEL MAP TO COMBINE LOTS 6 AND F, BLOCK 7, BURLINGAME TERRACE; PROPERTY AT 733-737 FAIRFIELD ROAD, FOR ZEV AND NAVA BEN-SIMON DPW Kirkup recommended approval of this final parcel map with recommendation to City Council when the existing buildings are removed or satisfactory bond for their removal is posted. The indeterminate storm drainage was discussed, the applicant to bear any cost of redistribution. Chm. Sine opened the public hearing. There were no comments and the hearing was closed. C. .Mink moved for approval of this final parcel map with recommendation to City Council when the existing buildings are removed or satisfactory bond for their removal is posted. Second C. Cistulli and approved 7-0 on roll call vote. APPLICATIONS FOR STUDY The following applications were set for public hearing June 23, 1980: 4. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, 612/616 ANSEL AVENUE, FOR GERALD P. GIROUARD 5• CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR ANSEL ARMS, A 9 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 616 ANSEL AVENUE, FOR GERALD P. GIROUARD Parking design does not entirely comply with the proposed code amendment soon to be transmitted to Council. 6. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE ABOVE Page 3 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes June 9, 1980 7. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR THE HIGHLANDER, A 6 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 15 HIGHLAND AVENUE, FOR THOMAS J. GLYNN I Second floor plans to be revised and new plans submitted for the public hearing. 8. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE ABOVE 9. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR PRIMROSE GARDENS, A 6 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 119 PRIMROSE ROAD, FOR MUNKDALE BROTHERS. INC. There are some problems with the basement parking layout. Amendments to the plans are being prepared. 10. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE ABOVE 11. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR BIARRITZ CONDOMINIUMS, A 4 UNIT PROJECT AT 1299 EL CAMINO REAL, FOR R/G ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT Most of the technical problems with this difficult lot have been worked out with the exception of the parking layout. 12. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE ABOVE 13. SPECIAL PERMIT TO OPERATE A CAR RENTAL AGENCY IN THE M-1 DISTRICT AT 1555 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY WITH CAR STORAGE AND SERVICING AT 1876 EL CAMINO REAL; BY PHILLIP GLECKMAN DBA PAYLESS CAR RENTAL Recess 8:35 P.M.; reconvene 8:40 P.M. OTHER BUSINESS 14. RESOLUTION NO. 3-80 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF TENANT PROTECTION MEASURES IN CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS Ref. Resolution No. 3-80 and additional information required by staff at the time of application for a conversion. There was general consensus the resolution fully expressed Commission discussion and intent. Discussion included: the possible length of time required for a conversion to be processed; the possibility of smaller buildings being converted; one Commissioner again expressed his opposition to this type of regulation. C. Mink moved for approval of Resolution No. 3-80. Second C. Cistulli and approved 6-1 on roll call vote, C. Francard dissenting. 15. POSSIBLE RECLASSIFICATION OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITES FROM RESIDENTIAL TO OPEN SPACE: MAY 19. 1980 COUNCIL REOUEST FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Ref. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4-78 "Regarding School Site Zoning"; City Attorney's June 5, 1980 memo to the City Council, subject: rental or lease of vacant school properties with attached draft ordinance; and May 30, 1980 memorandum to the City Council from Dr. James Black, Superintendent of the Elementary School District. CP Yost reviewed this item, noting the intent of the proposed ordinance is to allow limited commercial uses of School District properties, whereas the present ordinance allows only public or private schools. Reference was made to the discussions between City Council and the School District as well as neighborhood meetings which have been Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 June 9, 1980 held or are planned. Mr. Yost also reviewed Planning Commission Res. No. 4-78 determining school site zoning, and Council request that Commission consider whether the present zoning is adequate protection for the City and nearby neighbors. Discussion included: the Pershing School neighborhood meeting and criteria reached; the School District hopes for flexible use of the schools; the status of unclassified land; the possibility of reclassifying the school sites to open space; feasible uses for each of the schools. There was general consensus that the draft ordinance would meet the objectives of the City and the School District, allowing the City to have control of the use and the School District the opportunity for flexibility. Following further discussion regarding reclassification of certain school sites to open space, C. Harvey moved that Planning Commission Resolution No. 4-78 Regarding School Site Zoning be amended to change the zoning for Burlingame High School and the Peninsula Tennis Club from unclassified to open space. Second C. Sine; motion denied on a 6-0 roll call vote, C. Mink abstaining (conflict of interest). 16. POSSIBLE CODE AMENDMENT TO REQUIRE CITY APPROVAL FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW UTILITY POLES DPW Kirkup reviewed this item. Reference June 5, 1980 memo to Commission from the Director of Public Works, with attachment: April 25, 1980 memo to the Undergrounding Committee from the Asst. City Engineer. He discussed past City policy with regard to the proliferation of utility poles, the comparative costs for overhead poles versus undergrounding; the policy of the utility company; Undergrounding Committee discussion and the decision to refer this matter to the Commission. Mr. Kirkup asked if Commission wished to consider a code amendment to require City approval for installa- tion of new power poles. Commission and staff discussed: the possibility of conditioning special permits and condominium permits; notification in advance to a developer that undergrounding would be required; the specific areas staff was referring to; complaints about additional poles received from the public; the purpose and actions of the Undergrounding Committee; the cost to a developer for going underground versus above ground installa- tion; and costs related to residential versus commercial areas. Staff was requested to prepare a draft ordinance for review at a future meeting. 16a. Chm. Sine brought up the proliferation of newsstands throughout the commercial areas of the City, noting there are no City regulations. Concern was expressed about the driving habits of the people who service these stands. There was general consensus a regulation to control, not prohibit, newsstands should be studied. Staff will prepare a report for Commission consideration. 16b. C. Jacobs reported on her attendance at the San Mateo County Community College District conference, subject: "Housing Crisis: Strategies for San Mateo County". She noted the business affiliations of the majority of those in attendance, and commented on the discussions. CITY PLANNER REPORT CP Yost referenced June 4, 1980 memo from Commissioner Harvey to the City Planner with regard to the proposed ordinance establishing minimum dimensions for parking spaces, aisles and driveways. In explanation of his "no" vote at the May 28 meeting, C. Harvey advised he believed the proposed ordinance a good code amendment but suggested several engineering technicalities which might be improved. CP discussed these in detail. Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 June 9, 1980 During discussion C. Mink referred to Section A.(6), accepting C. Harvey's suggested change from 3" to 6" but adding "that the columns be placed in such a way that they do not interfere with doors or with turning movements". There was consensus that these revisions would strengthen the proposed ordinance. C. Jacobs moved the revisions be madebefore transmittal to City Council, including C. Mink's suggestion this evening. Second C. Taylor and approved 7-0 on roll call vote. ACKNOWLEDGMENT June 6, 1980 letter to all Planning Commissioners from Terrill Timberlake, 10 Guittard Road, Burlingame with reference to the Home Savings building at E1 Camino and Broadway. 4n InIIRNMFNT The meeting adjourned at 9:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Joseph E. Harvey Secretary