Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1980.10.29CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION .00TOBER 29, 1980 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was called to order by Chairman Sine on Wednesday, October 29, 1980 at 7:38 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Cistulli, Graham, Harvey, Jacobs, Sine, Taylor Absent: Commissioner Mink (excused) Staff Present: City Planner John R. Yost; City Attorney Jerome F. Coleman; City Engineer Frank C. Erbacher MINUTES - Upon motion of C. Jacobs, second C. Cistulli, the minutes of the October 15, 1980 meeting were approved and adopted with the following correction: on page 3, first and last paragraphs, change condition #8 in both instances to read "that Summit Drive and the approach road from Summit Drive to the playground be posted . . . If AGENDA - Upon motion of C. Jacobs, second C. Cistulli, order of the agenda approved. Chm. Sine introduced newly appointed apprentice Commissioner, Robert J. Leahy, whose term will become effective in April, 1981. APPLICATIONS FOR ACTION 1. VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT TO REPLACE A 670 SF GARAGE AND PATIO SHELTER WITH A 504 SF GARAGE AT 125 CHANNING ROAD, ZONED R-1 In the absence of applicant, item continued to the meeting of November 10, 1980. 2. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, EIR-53P, FOR THE PROPOSED INTERTELEPHON OFFICE DEVELOPMENT AT 700 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY TORREY & TORREY INC. Reference staff report dated 10/23/80; responses from responsible agencies and Burlingame staff as listed in and attached to the staff report; Notice of Hearing published in the San Mateo Times; Project Application & CEQA Assessment accepted by staff 9/5/80. Further references distributed this evening: revised site plan received October 28, 1980; October 27, 1980 letter from Joseph Kent, AIA with attached Project Data sheet; and October 23, 1980 letter to Ms. Rita Ein-Gel, Raiser Architectural Group from J. D. Drachman Associates with additional parking surveys as requested by staff. CP Yost discussed this project, permits required, State EIR Guidelines, new information received from the project architect and the additional traffic surveys. Irina Torrey, president of Torrey & Torrey Inc., San Francisco was present. She briefly discussed the impacts of the project, possible alternatives and responses to agency comments. Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 October 29, 1980 Commission discussion and concerns: need for a clear explanation of the proposed project in relation to J. D. Drachman's studies received this evening; curb cuts and median design; effect of the "mirrored" building; restricted access for campers and vans to the public recreational parking because of insufficient driveway height in the basement area; requirement that the parking deck be reinforced to support the Fire Department's aerial truck; water pressure in this area and the City's schedule for upgrading the system; and the proposed siting of this building in relation to adjacent projects. Chm. Sine opened the public hearing. There were no comments and the hearing was closed. It was determined the CA found this EIR to be a legally adequate document. Addressing a concern about new information received this evening, CA Coleman advised that Commission comments would be appropriate at the next meeting. Staff emphasized that approval of the EIR is not approval of the project. Chm. Sine then continued this item to the meeting of November 10, 1980 to allow time for the consultant to complete the addendum to the Draft EIR. 3. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A 1200 SF SAVINGS AND LOAN OFFICE AT 1801 EL CAMINO REAL, ZONED C-1, BY PAN AMERICAN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION CP Yost reviewed this application to remodel a 1200 SF office in the Burlingame Plaza shopping center and establish a new savings and loan. Reference staff report dated 10/22/80; Project Application & CEQA Assessment accepted by staff 10/3/80; site plan of Burlingame Plaza with list of existing businesses; September 29, 1980 letter from John W. Parry, Executive Vice President of Pan American Savings and Loan Association. CP discussed issues of significance and possible findings. Staff recommended approval with three conditions as listed in the staff report. CP reviewed Commission policy for granting nontransferable permits. It was determined that alterations to the exterior would be minor and that signage was not a part of this application. Staff was requested to research a possible uniform signage program granted some years ago for this property. James Brasil, one of the directors of Pan American Savings and Loan introduced Mario Castro, president and chairman of the board and John Parry, executive vice president. Mr. Brasil discussed their other locations,�the company's policy of seeking to serve the small depositor and a recent market feasibility study conducted for Pan American. Chm. Sine opened the public hearing. There were no comments and the hearing was closed. Commission comments and concerns: "think there is a need for this business at the Plaza"; "think the existing savings and loan and bank are adequate"; "this is a better project than a fast food operation"; concern about expansion in the future. C. Taylor found adequate testimony had been presented to make a finding that the proposed location would not break up the central core of the shopping center, that the presence of one more savings and loan would not necessarily present a burden to the entire area, and that the proposed savings and loan would provide a needed service to local residents. C. Jacobs moved for approval of this special permit with the following conditions: (1) that the permit be approved to Pan American Savings and Loan Association, and be nontransferable; (2) that the operation of this office be consistent with the September 29, 1980 letter from John W. Parry; and (3) that the proposed remodeling be done with a Building Permit and conform to the plans filed with this application. Second C. Cistulli. C. Taylor then suggested an amendment to the motion, that a fourth condition be added: (4) that the permit be issued for 1801 E1 Camino Real only. Condition accepted by C. Jacobs and C. Cistulli. Motion approved 5-1 on roll call vote (C. Graham dissenting, C. Mink absent). Appeal procedures were advised. Page 3 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 29, 1980 4. SPECIAL PERMIT TO OPERATE A RESTAURANT IN THE M-1 DISTRICT AT 819 MITTEN ROAD, BY SARKIS KULLUKIAN OF "CAFE EXPRESS" In the absence of the applicant, item continued to the meeting of November 10, 1980. 5. FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR CARMEL GARDENS, AN 18 UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 977 EL CAMINO REAL, FOR ZEV BEN-SIMON Reference October 23, 1980 memo from the City Engineer. CE Erbacher noted changes made during construction and proposed modification of the sidewalk improvements; he recommended approval with one condition as listed in his 10/23/80 memo. He confirmed it was his professional opinion the map could be adopted. C. Jacobs moved for approval and recommendation to City Council of this final subdivision map, with the condition that occupancy of one unit shall be held until such time as the owner and City have agreed upon any sidewalk changes or the sidewalk improvements are constructed per the original agreement. Second C. Cistulli; motion approved unanimously on voice vote. 6. FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR 6 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT 1348 EL CAMINO REAL, FOR GIOVACCHINO AND ARMANDO DIODATI Reference October 23, 1980 memo from the City Engineer. CE Erbacher noted minor changes to the design; staff had no objection and recommended approval. C. Jacobs moved for approval and recommendation to City Council of this final subdivision map. Second C. Cistulli; motion approved unanimously on voice vote. 7. FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR 9 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT 1133 DOUGLAS AVENUE, FOR S. LOGAN OWENS, JR. OF FAR WESTERN CAPITAL CORPORATION Reference October 23, 1980 memo from the City Engineer and October 9, 1980 letter from S. Logan Owens, Jr., Owner/Developer. CE Erbacher noted requirements of the owner's lender and city agreement with Mr. Owens; he recommended approval of this final map subject to the conditions stated in the owner's letter dated October 9, 1980. Discussion: the as -built survey required by the city before releasing occupancy of any unit; is the letter from the owner/developer an adequate safeguard to the city?; concern about possible changes in the original design; the city's ability to require an amended final map; the fact that many lending bankers are making this requirement. C. Harvey moved for approval and recommendation to City Council of this final subdivision map subject to the conditions set forth in the City Engineer's memo of October 23, 1980 and attached letter from S. Logan Owens, Jr., Owner/Developer dated October 9, 1980. Second C. Graham; motion approved 5-1 on roll call vote (C. Sine dissenting, C. Mink absent). Recess 8:55 P.M.; reconvene 9:05 P.M. APPLICATIONS FOR STUDY The following applications were set for public hearing November 10, 1980. 8. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW EXCURSIONS IN LEARNING TO OPERATE A TRAINING PROGRAM FOR HANDICAPPED CHILDREN AT ROOSEVELT SCHOOL; BY KRISTEN SANTIN CP advised there were no current active special permits for this property. Requests: information on State requirements for handicapped access; the length of the lease with the School District. Page 4 Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 29, 1980 9. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW DANCE MOVEMENT TO OPERATE AN EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS AT HOOVER SCHOOL; BY CLAUDIA BAKER CP advised the staff report for this item will discuss the application within the context of what -.has :beenn recently approved for the school and reflect the November 3 Council appeal hearing on the two previously approved applications. Requests: clarification of the applicant's statement that there will be nine hours of occupancy each day but only five hours of classes; parking plan for all school lessees. OTHER BUSINESS 10. STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUMS Reference staff report dated 10/24/80; copy of Ordinance No. 1015 Condominium Subdivisions; Engineering Department Condominium Permit Checklist dated September 1977; Planning Commission Resolution No. 16-75 Guidelines and Review Criteria for the Evaluation of Condominium Permit Applications; October 14, 1980 memo from the Chief Fire Inspector regarding office condominium conversions. CP Yost reviewed this item, noting it is mainly to inform Commission of several recent inquiries about commercial condominiums and to advise of staff study to date. He noted two possible types of commercial/industrial condominiums: new construction and conversion of existing buildings; present code regulations; staff recommendations and plans for further study to consider possible amendments. Discussion: should the same guidelines apply to commerical as to residential?; parking; conversions should meet present code; regulations of other cities. Staff will draft engineering standards for Commission review at a subsequent meeting. 11. RECOMMENDED REVOCATION HEARING OF SPECIAL PERMIT APPROVED MAY 14, 1979 AND AMENDED MARCH 10, 1980; FOR MUNKDALE BROS., INC. Reference October 7, 1980 letter from Director of Public Works to Munkdale Bros., Inc. re Grading and Drainage of PG&E Line Easement; Planning Commission minutes of May 14, 1979; site drawing; Staff Report for Item No. 1, P.C. 3/10/80; and Planning Commission minutes of March 10, 1980. CE Erbacher reviewed this permit, particularly the condition relating to site improvements. He advised that as -built plans had been received this afternoon and were found to be incomplete. Staff advised a progress report would be made at the November 10 meeting and requested that a revocation hearing be scheduled for November 24, 1980. Commission concurred with this schedule. ACKNOWLEDGMENT October 25, 1980 letter from Mrs. Gloria Eymil, 431 Andover Drive, Pacifica, California, re: housing. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:32 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Joseph E. Harvey Secretary