HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - PC - 1980.10.29CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION
.00TOBER 29, 1980
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Burlingame was called to order
by Chairman Sine on Wednesday, October 29, 1980 at 7:38 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Cistulli, Graham, Harvey, Jacobs, Sine, Taylor
Absent: Commissioner Mink (excused)
Staff Present: City Planner John R. Yost; City Attorney Jerome F. Coleman;
City Engineer Frank C. Erbacher
MINUTES - Upon motion of C. Jacobs, second C. Cistulli, the minutes of the October 15,
1980 meeting were approved and adopted with the following correction: on
page 3, first and last paragraphs, change condition #8 in both instances to
read "that Summit Drive and the approach road from Summit Drive to the
playground be posted . . . If
AGENDA - Upon motion of C. Jacobs, second C. Cistulli, order of the agenda approved.
Chm. Sine introduced newly appointed apprentice Commissioner, Robert J. Leahy, whose
term will become effective in April, 1981.
APPLICATIONS FOR ACTION
1. VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT TO REPLACE A 670 SF GARAGE AND PATIO SHELTER WITH A
504 SF GARAGE AT 125 CHANNING ROAD, ZONED R-1
In the absence of applicant, item continued to the meeting of November 10, 1980.
2. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, EIR-53P, FOR THE PROPOSED INTERTELEPHON OFFICE
DEVELOPMENT AT 700 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, PREPARED BY TORREY & TORREY INC.
Reference staff report dated 10/23/80; responses from responsible agencies and Burlingame
staff as listed in and attached to the staff report; Notice of Hearing published in
the San Mateo Times; Project Application & CEQA Assessment accepted by staff 9/5/80.
Further references distributed this evening: revised site plan received October 28, 1980;
October 27, 1980 letter from Joseph Kent, AIA with attached Project Data sheet; and
October 23, 1980 letter to Ms. Rita Ein-Gel, Raiser Architectural Group from J. D.
Drachman Associates with additional parking surveys as requested by staff.
CP Yost discussed this project, permits required, State EIR Guidelines, new information
received from the project architect and the additional traffic surveys.
Irina Torrey, president of Torrey & Torrey Inc., San Francisco was present. She
briefly discussed the impacts of the project, possible alternatives and responses to
agency comments.
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes
Page 2
October 29, 1980
Commission discussion and concerns: need for a clear explanation of the proposed project
in relation to J. D. Drachman's studies received this evening; curb cuts and median
design; effect of the "mirrored" building; restricted access for campers and vans to
the public recreational parking because of insufficient driveway height in the basement
area; requirement that the parking deck be reinforced to support the Fire Department's
aerial truck; water pressure in this area and the City's schedule for upgrading the
system; and the proposed siting of this building in relation to adjacent projects.
Chm. Sine opened the public hearing. There were no comments and the hearing was closed.
It was determined the CA found this EIR to be a legally adequate document. Addressing
a concern about new information received this evening, CA Coleman advised that
Commission comments would be appropriate at the next meeting. Staff emphasized that
approval of the EIR is not approval of the project. Chm. Sine then continued this item
to the meeting of November 10, 1980 to allow time for the consultant to complete the
addendum to the Draft EIR.
3. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A 1200 SF SAVINGS AND LOAN OFFICE AT 1801 EL CAMINO
REAL, ZONED C-1, BY PAN AMERICAN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
CP Yost reviewed this application to remodel a 1200 SF office in the Burlingame Plaza
shopping center and establish a new savings and loan. Reference staff report dated
10/22/80; Project Application & CEQA Assessment accepted by staff 10/3/80; site plan
of Burlingame Plaza with list of existing businesses; September 29, 1980 letter from
John W. Parry, Executive Vice President of Pan American Savings and Loan Association.
CP discussed issues of significance and possible findings. Staff recommended approval
with three conditions as listed in the staff report.
CP reviewed Commission policy for granting nontransferable permits. It was determined
that alterations to the exterior would be minor and that signage was not a part of this
application. Staff was requested to research a possible uniform signage program
granted some years ago for this property.
James Brasil, one of the directors of Pan American Savings and Loan introduced Mario
Castro, president and chairman of the board and John Parry, executive vice president.
Mr. Brasil discussed their other locations,�the company's policy of seeking to serve
the small depositor and a recent market feasibility study conducted for Pan American.
Chm. Sine opened the public hearing. There were no comments and the hearing was closed.
Commission comments and concerns: "think there is a need for this business at the
Plaza"; "think the existing savings and loan and bank are adequate"; "this is a better
project than a fast food operation"; concern about expansion in the future. C. Taylor
found adequate testimony had been presented to make a finding that the proposed
location would not break up the central core of the shopping center, that the presence
of one more savings and loan would not necessarily present a burden to the entire area,
and that the proposed savings and loan would provide a needed service to local
residents.
C. Jacobs moved for approval of this special permit with the following conditions:
(1) that the permit be approved to Pan American Savings and Loan Association, and be
nontransferable; (2) that the operation of this office be consistent with the
September 29, 1980 letter from John W. Parry; and (3) that the proposed remodeling
be done with a Building Permit and conform to the plans filed with this application.
Second C. Cistulli. C. Taylor then suggested an amendment to the motion, that a fourth
condition be added: (4) that the permit be issued for 1801 E1 Camino Real only. Condition
accepted by C. Jacobs and C. Cistulli. Motion approved 5-1 on roll call vote (C. Graham
dissenting, C. Mink absent). Appeal procedures were advised.
Page 3
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 29, 1980
4. SPECIAL PERMIT TO OPERATE A RESTAURANT IN THE M-1 DISTRICT AT 819 MITTEN ROAD,
BY SARKIS KULLUKIAN OF "CAFE EXPRESS"
In the absence of the applicant, item continued to the meeting of November 10, 1980.
5. FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR CARMEL GARDENS, AN 18 UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 977 EL CAMINO
REAL, FOR ZEV BEN-SIMON
Reference October 23, 1980 memo from the City Engineer. CE Erbacher noted changes made
during construction and proposed modification of the sidewalk improvements; he
recommended approval with one condition as listed in his 10/23/80 memo. He confirmed
it was his professional opinion the map could be adopted.
C. Jacobs moved for approval and recommendation to City Council of this final subdivision
map, with the condition that occupancy of one unit shall be held until such time as the
owner and City have agreed upon any sidewalk changes or the sidewalk improvements are
constructed per the original agreement. Second C. Cistulli; motion approved unanimously
on voice vote.
6. FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR 6 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT 1348 EL CAMINO REAL, FOR
GIOVACCHINO AND ARMANDO DIODATI
Reference October 23, 1980 memo from the City Engineer. CE Erbacher noted minor changes
to the design; staff had no objection and recommended approval. C. Jacobs moved for
approval and recommendation to City Council of this final subdivision map. Second
C. Cistulli; motion approved unanimously on voice vote.
7. FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP FOR 9 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT 1133 DOUGLAS AVENUE, FOR S. LOGAN
OWENS, JR. OF FAR WESTERN CAPITAL CORPORATION
Reference October 23, 1980 memo from the City Engineer and October 9, 1980 letter from
S. Logan Owens, Jr., Owner/Developer. CE Erbacher noted requirements of the owner's
lender and city agreement with Mr. Owens; he recommended approval of this final map
subject to the conditions stated in the owner's letter dated October 9, 1980.
Discussion: the as -built survey required by the city before releasing occupancy of any
unit; is the letter from the owner/developer an adequate safeguard to the city?;
concern about possible changes in the original design; the city's ability to require
an amended final map; the fact that many lending bankers are making this requirement.
C. Harvey moved for approval and recommendation to City Council of this final subdivision
map subject to the conditions set forth in the City Engineer's memo of October 23, 1980
and attached letter from S. Logan Owens, Jr., Owner/Developer dated October 9, 1980.
Second C. Graham; motion approved 5-1 on roll call vote (C. Sine dissenting, C. Mink
absent).
Recess 8:55 P.M.; reconvene 9:05 P.M.
APPLICATIONS FOR STUDY
The following applications were set for public hearing November 10, 1980.
8. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW EXCURSIONS IN LEARNING TO OPERATE A TRAINING PROGRAM FOR
HANDICAPPED CHILDREN AT ROOSEVELT SCHOOL; BY KRISTEN SANTIN
CP advised there were no current active special permits for this property. Requests:
information on State requirements for handicapped access; the length of the lease with
the School District.
Page 4
Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes October 29, 1980
9. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW DANCE MOVEMENT TO OPERATE AN EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR
CHILDREN AND ADULTS AT HOOVER SCHOOL; BY CLAUDIA BAKER
CP advised the staff report for this item will discuss the application within the
context of what -.has :beenn recently approved for the school and reflect the November 3
Council appeal hearing on the two previously approved applications. Requests:
clarification of the applicant's statement that there will be nine hours of occupancy
each day but only five hours of classes; parking plan for all school lessees.
OTHER BUSINESS
10. STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUMS
Reference staff report dated 10/24/80; copy of Ordinance No. 1015 Condominium Subdivisions;
Engineering Department Condominium Permit Checklist dated September 1977; Planning
Commission Resolution No. 16-75 Guidelines and Review Criteria for the Evaluation of
Condominium Permit Applications; October 14, 1980 memo from the Chief Fire Inspector
regarding office condominium conversions.
CP Yost reviewed this item, noting it is mainly to inform Commission of several recent
inquiries about commercial condominiums and to advise of staff study to date. He noted
two possible types of commercial/industrial condominiums: new construction and conversion
of existing buildings; present code regulations; staff recommendations and plans for
further study to consider possible amendments.
Discussion: should the same guidelines apply to commerical as to residential?; parking;
conversions should meet present code; regulations of other cities. Staff will draft
engineering standards for Commission review at a subsequent meeting.
11. RECOMMENDED REVOCATION HEARING OF SPECIAL PERMIT APPROVED MAY 14, 1979 AND AMENDED
MARCH 10, 1980; FOR MUNKDALE BROS., INC.
Reference October 7, 1980 letter from Director of Public Works to Munkdale Bros., Inc.
re Grading and Drainage of PG&E Line Easement; Planning Commission minutes of May 14,
1979; site drawing; Staff Report for Item No. 1, P.C. 3/10/80; and Planning Commission
minutes of March 10, 1980.
CE Erbacher reviewed this permit, particularly the condition relating to site improvements.
He advised that as -built plans had been received this afternoon and were found to be
incomplete. Staff advised a progress report would be made at the November 10 meeting
and requested that a revocation hearing be scheduled for November 24, 1980. Commission
concurred with this schedule.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
October 25, 1980 letter from Mrs. Gloria Eymil, 431 Andover Drive, Pacifica, California,
re: housing.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:32 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Joseph E. Harvey
Secretary